Turkic languages are spoken by some 200 million people.[1] The Turkic language with the greatest number of speakers is Turkish, spoken mainly in Anatolia and the Balkans; its native speakers account for about 38% of all Turkic speakers, followed by Uzbek.[4]
Turkic languages show many similarities with the Mongolic, Tungusic, Koreanic, and Japonic languages. These similarities have led some linguists (including Talât Tekin) to propose an Altaic language family, though this proposal is widely rejected by historical linguists.[7][8] Similarities with the Uralic languages even caused these families to be regarded as one for a long time under the Ural-Altaic hypothesis.[9][10][11] However, there has not been sufficient evidence to conclude the existence of either of these macrofamilies. The shared characteristics between the languages are attributed presently to extensive prehistoric language contact.
Turkic languages are null-subject languages, have vowel harmony (with the notable exception of Uzbek due to strong Persian-Tajik influence), converbs, extensive agglutination by means of suffixes and postpositions, and lack of grammatical articles, noun classes, and grammatical gender. Subject–object–verb word order is universal within the family. In terms of the level of vowel harmony in the Turkic language family, Tuvan is characterized as almost fully harmonic whereas Uzbek is the least harmonic or not harmonic at all. Taking into account the documented historico-linguistic development of Turkic languages overall, both inscriptional and textual, the family provides over one millennium of documented stages as well as scenarios in the linguistic evolution of vowel harmony which, in turn, demonstrates harmony evolution along a confidently definable trajectory[12] Though vowel harmony is a common characteristic of major language families spoken in Inner Eurasia (Mongolic, Tungusic, Uralic and Turkic), the type of harmony found in them differs from each other, specifically, Uralic and Turkic have a shared type of vowel harmony (called palatal vowel harmony) whereas Mongolic and Tungusic represent a different type.
The homeland of the Turkic peoples and their language is suggested to be somewhere between the Transcaspian steppe and Northeastern Asia (Manchuria),[13] with genetic evidence pointing to the region near South Siberia and Mongolia as the "Inner Asian Homeland" of the Turkic ethnicity.[14] Similarly several linguists, including Juha Janhunen, Roger Blench and Matthew Spriggs, suggest that modern-day Mongolia is the homeland of the early Turkic language.[15] Relying on Proto-Turkic lexical items about the climate, topography, flora, fauna, people's modes of subsistence, Turkologist Peter Benjamin Golden locates the Proto-Turkic Urheimat in the southern, taiga-steppe zone of the Sayan-Altay region.[16]
Extensive contact took place between Proto-Turks and Proto-Mongols approximately during the first millennium BC; the shared cultural tradition between the two Eurasian nomadic groups is called the "Turco-Mongol" tradition. The two groups shared a similar religion system, Tengrism, and there exists a multitude of evident loanwords between Turkic languages and Mongolic languages. Although the loans were bidirectional, today Turkic loanwords constitute the largest foreign component in Mongolian vocabulary.[17]
Italian historian and philologist Igor de Rachewiltz noted a significant distinction of the Chuvash language from other Turkic languages. According to him, the Chuvash language does not share certain common characteristics with Turkic languages to such a degree that some scholars consider it an independent Chuvash family similar to Uralic and Turkic languages. Turkic classification of Chuvash was seen as a compromise solution for the classification purposes.[18]
Some lexical and extensive typological similarities between Turkic and the nearby Tungusic and Mongolic families, as well as the Korean and Japonic families has in more recent years been instead attributed to prehistoric contact amongst the group, sometimes referred to as the Northeast Asian sprachbund. A more recent (circa first millennium BC) contact between "core Altaic" (Turkic, Mongolic, and Tungusic) is distinguished from this, due to the existence of definitive common words that appear to have been mostly borrowed from Turkic into Mongolic, and later from Mongolic into Tungusic, as Turkic borrowings into Mongolic significantly outnumber Mongolic borrowings into Turkic, and Turkic and Tungusic do not share any words that do not also exist in Mongolic.
Turkic languages also show some Chinese loanwords that point to early contact during the time of Proto-Turkic.[19]
Early written records
The first established records of the Turkic languages are the eighth century AD Orkhon inscriptions by the Göktürks, recording the Old Turkic language, which were discovered in 1889 in the Orkhon Valley in Mongolia. The Compendium of the Turkic Dialects (Divânü Lügati't-Türk), written during the 11th century AD by Kaşgarlı Mahmud of the Kara-Khanid Khanate, constitutes an early linguistic treatment of the family. The Compendium is the first comprehensive dictionary of the Turkic languages and also includes the first known map of the Turkic speakers' geographical distribution. It mainly pertains to the Southwestern branch of the family.[20]
The geographical distribution of Turkic-speaking peoples across Eurasia since the Ottoman era ranges from the North-East of Siberia to Turkey in the West.[25] (See picture in the box on the right above.)
For centuries, the Turkic-speaking peoples have migrated extensively and intermingled continuously, and their languages have been influenced mutually and through contact with the surrounding languages, especially the Iranian, Slavic, and Mongolic languages.[26]
This has obscured the historical developments within each language and/or language group, and as a result, there exist several systems to classify the Turkic languages. The modern genetic classification schemes for Turkic are still largely indebted to Samoilovich (1922).[citation needed]
The Turkic languages may be divided into six branches:[27]
In this classification, Oghur Turkic is also referred to as Lir-Turkic, and the other branches are subsumed under the title of Shaz-Turkic or Common Turkic. It is not clear when these two major types of Turkic can be assumed to have diverged.[28]
With less certainty, the Southwestern, Northwestern, Southeastern and Oghur groups may further be summarized as West Turkic, the Northeastern, Kyrgyz-Kipchak, and Arghu (Khalaj) groups as East Turkic.[29]
Geographically and linguistically, the languages of the Northwestern and Southeastern subgroups belong to the central Turkic languages, while the Northeastern and Khalaj languages are the so-called peripheral languages.[citation needed]
The following isoglosses are traditionally used in the classification of the Turkic languages:[31][27]
Rhotacism (or in some views, zetacism), e.g. in the last consonant of the word for "nine" *tokkuz. This separates the Oghur branch, which exhibits /r/, from the rest of Turkic, which exhibits /z/. In this case, rhotacism refers to the development of *-/r/, *-/z/, and *-/d/ to /r/,*-/k/,*-/kh/ in this branch.[32] See Antonov and Jacques (2012)[33] on the debate concerning rhotacism and lambdacism in Turkic.
Intervocalic *d, e.g. the second consonant in the word for "foot" *hadaq
Suffix-final -G, e.g. in the suffix *lIG, in e.g. *tāglïg
Additional isoglosses include:
Preservation of word initial *h, e.g. in the word for "foot" *hadaq. This separates Khalaj as a peripheral language.
Denasalisation of palatal *ń, e.g. in the word for "moon", *āń
*In the standard Istanbul dialect of Turkish, the ğ in dağ and dağlı is not realized as a consonant, but as a slight lengthening of the preceding vowel.
Members
The following table is based mainly upon the classification scheme presented by Lars Johanson.[34][35]
The following is a brief comparison of cognates among the basic vocabulary across the Turkic language family (about 60 words). Despite being cognates, some of the words may denote a different meaning.
Empty cells do not necessarily imply that a particular language is lacking a word to describe the concept, but rather that the word for the concept in that language may be formed from another stem and is not cognate with the other words in the row or that a loanword is used in its place.
Also, there may be shifts in the meaning from one language to another, and so the "Common meaning" given is only approximate. In some cases, the form given is found only in some dialects of the language, or a loanword is much more common (e.g. in Turkish, the preferred word for "fire" is the Persian-derived ateş, whereas the native od is dead). Forms are given in native Latin orthographies unless otherwise noted.
Turkish and Azerbaijani "ı", Karakhanid "ɨ", Turkmen "y", and Sakha "ï": IPA /ɯ/
Turkmen "ň", Karakhanid "ŋ": IPA /ŋ/
Turkish and Azerbaijani "y",Turkmen "ý" and "j" in other languages: IPA /j/
All "ş" and "š" letters: IPA /ʃ/
All "ç" and "č" letters: IPA /t͡ʃ/
Kyrgyz "c": IPA /d͡ʒ/
Kazakh "j": IPA /ʒ/
Other possible relations
The Turkic language family is currently regarded as one of the world's primary language families.[10] Turkic is one of the main members of the controversial Altaic language family, but Altaic currently lacks support from a majority of linguists. None of the theories linking Turkic languages to other families have a wide degree of acceptance at present. Shared features with languages grouped together as Altaic have been interpreted by most mainstream linguists to be the result of a sprachbund.[54]
Rejected or controversial theories
Korean
The possibility of a genetic relation between Turkic and Korean, independently from Altaic, is suggested by some linguists.[55][56][57] The linguist Kabak (2004) of the University of Würzburg states that Turkic and Korean share similar phonology as well as morphology. Li Yong-Sŏng (2014)[56] suggest that there are several cognates between Turkic and Old Korean. He states that these supposed cognates can be useful to reconstruct the early Turkic language. According to him, words related to nature, earth and ruling but especially to the sky and stars seem to be cognates.
The linguist Choi[57] suggested already in 1996 a close relationship between Turkic and Korean regardless of any Altaic connections:
In addition, the fact that the morphological elements are not easily borrowed between languages, added to the fact that the common morphological elements between Korean and Turkic are not less numerous than between Turkic and other Altaic languages, strengthens the possibility that there is a close genetic affinity between Korean and Turkic.
— Choi Han-Woo, A Comparative Study of Korean and Turkic (Hoseo University)
Many historians also point out a close non-linguistic relationship between Turkic peoples and Koreans.[58] Especially close were the relations between the Göktürks and Goguryeo.[59]
Uralic
Some linguists suggested a relation to Uralic languages, especially to the Ugric languages. This view is rejected and seen as obsolete by mainstream linguists. Similarities are because of language contact and borrowings mostly from Turkic into Ugric languages. Stachowski (2015) states that any relation between Turkic and Uralic must be a contact one.[60]
^Nikolai Baskakov and some others believe that the Kyrgyz–Kipchak subgroup originally belonged to the Siberian group, but was significantly influenced by the Kipchak languages and can now be included in the Kipchak group.[40][41][42]
^Lars Johanson once considered Kyrgyz language to be a member of South Kipchak.(Johanson 1998)
^Äynu contains a very large Persian vocabulary component, and is spoken exclusively by adult men, almost as a cryptolect.
^Lars Johanson once classified South Siberian group into 4 subgroups (Sayan Turkic, Yenisei Turkic, Chulym Turkic and Altai Turkic). Sayan Turkic consisted of Tuvan (Soyot, Uriankhai) and Tofa (Karagas). Yenisei Turkic consisted of Khakas, Shor and related dialects (Saghay, Qaca, Qizil). Chulym Turkic consisted of dialects such as Küerik. Altai Turkic consisted of Altay (Oirot) and dialects such as Tuba, Qumanda, Qu, Teleut, Telengit. (Johanson 1998)
^According to Lars Johanson, Fuyu Kyrgyz is considered to be closely related to Khakas.
^Nikolai Baskakov and some others considered Southern Altai language to be a member of Kyrgyz-Kipchak subgroup.[40][41][42]
^ abRybatzki, Volker (2020). "Altaic Languages: Tungusic, Mongolic, Turkic". In Martine Robbeets; Alexander Savelyev (eds.). The Oxford Guide to the Transeurasian Languages. Oxford University Press. pp. 22–28. doi:10.1093/oso/9780198804628.003.0003.
^Janhunen, Juha (2013). "Personal pronouns in Core Altaic". In Martine Irma Robbeets; Hubert Cuyckens (eds.). Shared Grammaticalization: With Special Focus on the Transeurasian Languages. John Benjamins. p. 223. ISBN9789027205995. Archived from the original on 15 January 2023. Retrieved 19 April 2017.
^Vovin, Alexander (2005). "The end of the Altaic controversy: In memory of Gerhard Doerfer". Central Asiatic Journal. 49 (1): 71–132. JSTOR41928378.
^Georg, Stefan; Michalove, Peter A.; Ramer, Alexis Manaster; Sidwell, Paul J. (1999). "Telling general linguists about Altaic". Journal of Linguistics. 35 (1): 65–98. doi:10.1017/S0022226798007312. JSTOR4176504. S2CID144613877.
^Clark, Larry V. (1980). "Turkic Loanwords in Mongol, I: The Treatment of Non-initial S, Z, Š, Č". Central Asiatic Journal. 24 (1/2): 36–59. JSTOR41927278.
^Rachewiltz, Igor de.Introduction to Altaic philology: Turkic, Mongolian, Manchu / by Igor de Rachewiltz and Volker Rybatzki; with the collaboration of Hung Chin-fu. p. cm. — (Handbook of Oriental Studies = Handbuch der Orientalistik. Section 8, Central Asia; 20). — Leiden; Boston, 2010. — P. 7.
^Johanson, Lars; Johanson, Éva Ágnes Csató (29 April 2015). The Turkic Languages. Routledge. ISBN9781136825279. Archived from the original on 15 January 2023. Retrieved 22 November 2020.
^Johanson, Lars; Csató, Éva Á, eds. (2021). The Turkic Languages. Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003243809. ISBN9781003243809. Another Turkic people in the Volga area are the Chuvash, who, like the Tatars, regard themselves as descendants of the Volga Bulghars in the historical and cultural sense. It is clear that Chuvash belongs to the Oghur branch of Turkic, as the language of the Volga Bulghars did, but no direct evidence for diachronic development between the two has been established. As there were several distinct Oghur languages in the Middle Ages, Volga Bulghar could represent one of these and Chuvash another.
^Agyagási, K. (2020). "A Volga Bulgarian Classifier: A Historical and Areal Linguistic Study". University of Debrecen. 3: 9. Modern Chuvash is the only descendant language of the Ogur branch. The ancestors of its speakers left the Khazar Empire in the 8th century and migrated to the region at the confluence of the Volga and Kama rivers, where they founded the Volga Bulgarian Empire in the 10th century. In the central Volga region three Volga Bulgarian dialects developed, and Chuvash is the descendant of the 3rd dialect of Volga Bulgarian (Agyagási 2019: 160–183). Sources refer to it as a separate language beginning with 1508
^Gordon, Raymond G. Jr., ed. (2005). "Ethnologue: Languages of the World, Fifteenth edition. Language Family Trees – Turkic". Archived from the original on 14 September 2012. Retrieved 18 March 2007. The reliability of Ethnologue lies mainly in its statistics whereas its framework for the internal classification of Turkic is still based largely on Baskakov (1962) and the collective work in Deny et al. (1959–1964). A more up-to-date alternative to classifying these languages on internal comparative grounds is to be found in the work of Johanson and his co-workers.
^ abcBaskakov, N. A. (1958). "La Classification des Dialectes de la Langue Turque d'Altaï". Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae (in French). 8: 9–15. ISSN0001-6446.
^ abcBaskakov, N. A. (1969). Введение в изучение тюркских языков [Introduction to the study of the Turkic languages] (in Russian). Moscow: Nauka.
^ abcKormushin, I. V. (2018). "Алтайский язык" [Altai language]. Большая российская энциклопедия/Great Russian Encyclopedia Online (in Russian). Archived from the original on 27 July 2021. Retrieved 31 July 2021.
^Rassadin, V.I. "The Soyot Language". Endangered Languages of Indigenous Peoples of Siberia. UNESCO. Archived from the original on 3 May 2006. Retrieved 18 July 2021.
^Bitkeeva, A.N. "The Kumandin Language". Endangered Languages of Indigenous Peoples of Siberia. UNESCO. Archived from the original on 11 July 2021. Retrieved 16 July 2021.
^Tazranova, A.R. "The Chelkan Language". Endangered Languages of Indigenous Peoples of Siberia. UNESCO. Archived from the original on 11 July 2021. Retrieved 16 July 2021.
^Nevskaya, I.A. "The Teleut Language". Endangered Languages of Indigenous Peoples of Siberia. UNESCO. Archived from the original on 11 July 2021. Retrieved 16 July 2021.
^Sibata, Takesi (1979). "Some syntactic similarities between Turkish, Korean, and Japanese". Central Asiatic Journal. 23 (3/4): 293–296. ISSN0008-9192. JSTOR41927271.
^ abSOME STAR NAMES IN MODERN TURKIC LANGUAGES-I – Yong-Sŏng LI – Academy of Korean Studies Grant funded by the Korean Government (MEST) (AKS-2010-AGC-2101) – Seoul National University 2014
Akhatov G. Kh. 1960. "About the stress in the language of the Siberian Tatars in connection with the stress of modern Tatar literary language" .- Sat *"Problems of Turkic and the history of Russian Oriental Studies." Kazan. (in Russian)
Akhatov G.Kh. 1963. "Dialect West Siberian Tatars" (monograph). Ufa. (in Russian)
Baskakov, N. A. (1962, 1969). Introduction to the study of the Turkic languages. Moscow. (in Russian)
Boeschoten, Hendrik & Lars Johanson. 2006. Turkic languages in contact. Turcologica, Bd. 61. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz. ISBN3-447-05212-0
Clausen, Gerard. 1972. An etymological dictionary of pre-thirteenth-century Turkish. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Deny, Jean et al. 1959–1964. Philologiae Turcicae Fundamenta. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
Johanson, Lars & Éva Agnes Csató (ed.). 2022. The Turkic Languages. Second edition. London: Routledge. ISBN978-0-415-73856-9.
Johanson, Lars. 2022. "The history of Turkic." In: Johanson & Csató, pp. 83–120.[2]Archived 8 April 2011 at the Wayback Machine
Johanson, Lars. 1998. "Turkic languages." In: Encyclopædia Britannica. CD 98. Encyclopædia Britannica Online, 5 sept. 2007.[3]Archived 23 June 2008 at the Wayback Machine
Menges, K. H. 1968. The Turkic languages and peoples: An introduction to Turkic studies. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
Öztopçu, Kurtuluş. 1996. Dictionary of the Turkic languages: English, Azerbaijani, Kazakh, Kyrgyz, Tatar, Turkish, Turkmen, Uighur, Uzbek. London: Routledge. ISBN0-415-14198-2
Samoilovich, A. N. 1922. Some additions to the classification of the Turkish languages. Petrograd.
Savelyev, Alexander and Martine Robbeets. (2019). lexibank/savelyevturkic: Turkic Basic Vocabulary Database (Version v1.0) [Data set]. Zenodo. doi:10.5281/zenodo.3556518
Schönig, Claus. 1997–1998. "A new attempt to classify the Turkic languages I-III." Turkic Languages 1:1.117–133, 1:2.262–277, 2:1.130–151.
Schönig, Claus. "The Internal Division of Modern Turkic and Its Historical Implications". In: Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, vol. 52, no. 1, 1999, pp. 63–95. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/43391369Archived 3 January 2023 at the Wayback Machine. Accessed 3 Jan. 2023.
1These are traditional areas of settlement; the Turkic group has been living in the listed country/region for centuries and should not be confused with modern diasporas. 2State with limited international recognition.
The following is a list of Playboy Playmates of 1984, the 30th anniversary year of the publication. Playboy magazine names their Playmate of the Month each month throughout the year. January Main article: Penny Baker Penny BakerPersonal detailsBorn (1965-10-05) October 5, 1965 (age 58)Buffalo, New York[1]Height5 ft 8 in (1.73 m)[1] Penny Baker (born October 5, 1965)[1] is an American model and actress. After being interviewed in Chicago, she was ch...
Anna Rita Del Piano Född26 juli 1966 (57 år)Cassano delle Murge, ItalienMedborgare iItalienSysselsättningScenskådespelare, sångare, filmskådespelareWebbplatsannaritadelpiano.it/Redigera Wikidata Anna Rita Del Piano, född Anna Rita Viapiano 26 juli 1966 i Cassano delle Murge, är en italiensk skådespelare. Externa länkar Anna Rita Del Piano på Internet Movie Database (engelska) Denna artikel om en skådespelare från Italien saknar väsentlig information. D...
نورث هليز الإحداثيات 40°46′33″N 73°40′22″W / 40.7758°N 73.6728°W / 40.7758; -73.6728 [1] تقسيم إداري البلد الولايات المتحدة[2] التقسيم الأعلى مقاطعة ناسو خصائص جغرافية المساحة 7.142347 كيلومتر مربع7.146038 كيلومتر مربع (1 أبريل 2010) ارتفاع 66 متر عدد الس...
Malaysian politician In this Malay name, there is no surname or family name. The name Syed Zain Barakhbah is a patronymic, and the person should be referred to by their given name, Syed Razak. The word bin or binti/binte means 'son of' or 'daughter of', respectively. Yang Berbahagia Dato' Seri Utama HajiSyed Razak Syed Zain BarakhbahDMK SSDK DSDK KMN AMN JPسيد رزاق سيد زين بارکبه8th Menteri Besar of KedahIn office11 December 1999 – 22 December 2005MonarchAbdul Ha...
Australian politician The Right HonourableSir Charles AdermannKBEMinister for Primary IndustryIn office10 December 1958 – 16 October 1967Prime MinisterRobert MenziesHarold HoltPreceded byWilliam McMahonSucceeded byDoug AnthonyDeputy Leader of the Country PartyIn office11 December 1963 – 8 December 1966LeaderJohn McEwenPreceded byCharles DavidsonSucceeded byDoug AnthonyMember of the Australian Parliamentfor FisherIn office10 December 1949 – 2 November 1972Prece...
This article is about the park in Sydney. For the actress, see Sydney Park (actress). For other uses, see Sydney Park (disambiguation). Sydney ParkFormer Austral brick works at Sydney ParkLocationSydney Park Road, Alexandria New South Wales, AustraliaNearest citySydneyCoordinates33°54′38″S 151°11′05″E / 33.9105284°S 151.1846209°E / -33.9105284; 151.1846209Area41.6 hectares (103 acres)Created11 February 1991 (1991-02-11)[1]Operate...
كل شيء عن أميTodo sobre mi madre (بالإسبانية) معلومات عامةالصنف الفني كوميدي، دراماالمواضيع القائمة ... death of one's child (en) [1] — التصالح مع الماضي[1] — ex (en) [1] — الأمومة[2] — تغيير الجنس[2] — تحقيق الذات[2] تاريخ الصدور 1999مدة العرض 104 دقيقةاللغة الأصلية الكتالاني�...
House elections for the 17th U.S. Congress 1820–21 United States House of Representatives elections ← 1818 & 1819 July 3, 1820 – August 10, 1821 1822 & 1823 → All 187[a] seats in the United States House of Representatives94 seats needed for a majority Majority party Minority party Leader Philip P. Barbour Louis McLane Party Democratic-Republican Federalist Leader's seat Virginia 11th Delaware at-large Last election 16...
Wakil Bupati LahatPetahanaH. Haryanto, S.E., M.M.sejak 9 Desember 2018Masa jabatan5 tahunDibentuk1998Pejabat pertamaH. Yulizar Dinoto, S.H.Situs webwww.lahatkab.go.id Berikut ini adalah daftar Wakil Bupati Lahat dari masa ke masa. No Wakil Bupati Mulai Jabatan Akhir Jabatan Prd. Ket. Bupati 1 H.Yulizar DinotoS.H. 1998 2003 1 Drs. H.HarunataM.M. 2 H. M.Zubir Ali 2003 2008 2 3 Drs. H.Sukadi DuadjiM.M. 2008 2013 3 H.Saifudin Aswari RivaiS.E. 4 Marwan MansyurS.H., M.M. 9...
Diacritical mark, the dot element of the letters i and j For the surname, see Tittle (surname). Not to be confused with title or tilde. Lowercase i and j in Liberation Serif, with tittles in red. A tittle or superscript dot[1] is a small distinguishing mark, such as a diacritic in the form of a dot on a letter (for example, lowercase i or j). The tittle is an integral part of the glyph of i and j, but diacritic dots can appear over other letters in various languages. In most languages...
Christianity-related events during the 18th century See also: Christianity in the 17th century and Christianity in the 19th century For broader coverage of this topic, see Christianity in the modern era. George Whitefield, leader in the First Great Awakening Christianity in the 18th century is marked by the First Great Awakening in the Americas, along with the expansion of the Spanish and Portuguese empires around the world, which helped to spread Catholicism. Protestant Pietism, evangelicali...
Disambiguazione – Se stai cercando altri significati, vedi Mosè (disambigua). MosèIl Mosè di Michelangelo Buonarroti (1513-1516), basilica di San Pietro in Vincoli, Roma Profeta NascitaGoscen in Egitto, XIII secolo a.C. MorteMonte Nebo, XII secolo a.C. Venerato daTutte le Chiese che ammettono il culto dei santi Ricorrenza4 settembre Attributile Tavole della legge Manuale Mosè (latino: Moyses; Moisè in italiano arcaico[1]; in ebraico: משֶׁה, standard Moshé, tib...
Pudong. Light effects in The Bund sightseeing tunnel. Attractions in Shanghai, China, include:[1][2][3] The Bund Bund Sightseeing Tunnel City God Temple Consulate-General of Russia in Shanghai Expo 2010 General Post Office Building Happy Valley Shanghai Jade Buddha Temple Jin Mao Tower Jing'an Temple Jinjiang Action Park Longhua Temple Nanjing Road Oriental Pearl Tower People's Park People's Square Pudong Qibao St. Ignatius Cathedral of Shanghai Shanghai Disney Resort...
Species of mammal Flat-headed shrew Conservation status Data Deficient (IUCN 3.1) Scientific classification Domain: Eukaryota Kingdom: Animalia Phylum: Chordata Class: Mammalia Order: Eulipotyphla Family: Soricidae Genus: Crocidura Species: C. planiceps Binomial name Crocidura planicepsHeller, 1910 Flat-headed shrew range The flat-headed shrew (Crocidura planiceps) is a species of mammal in the family Soricidae. It is found in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Ethiopia, Nigeria...
Diese Zeichnung im Manuskript des Werkes De revolutionibus orbium coelestium (1543) von Nikolaus Kopernikus veranschaulicht den Ausgangspunkt des kopernikanischen Weltbilds: Die Planeten bewegen sich auf kreisförmigen Bahnen um die Sonne. Unter der kopernikanischen Wende oder der kopernikanischen Revolution (nach Nikolaus Kopernikus) versteht man die Abkehr vom geozentrischen (d. h. die Erde als Mittelpunkt des Sonnensystems habenden) Weltbild, die sich im 16. und 17. Jahrhundert in Eur...
Dayung pada Olimpiade Musim Panas 1908LokasiHenley Royal RegattaLondonTanggal28–31 Juli 1908Jumlah disiplin4Peserta81 dari 8 negara← 19041912 → Dayung pada Olimpiade Musim Panas 1908 adalah pelaksanaan cabang olahraga dayung pada penyelenggaraan Olimpiade Musim Panas 1908. Kompetisi pada cabang olahraga ini berlangsung di Henley Royal Regatta, London.[1] Edisi ini menandingkan 4 nomor. 81 atlet dari 8 negara bertanding dalam edisi ini. Referensi ...
Bộ Văn hóa, Thể thao vàDu lịchChính phủ Việt NamBộ trưởng đương nhiệmNguyễn Văn Hùngtừ 8 tháng 4 năm 2021Bổ nhiệm bởiChủ tịch nước Việt NamNhiệm kỳ5 nămThành lập28 tháng 8 năm 1945; 78 năm trước (1945-08-28)Bộ trưởng đầu tiênTrần Huy Liệu (Bộ Thông tin, Tuyên truyền)Ngân sách2024 3.563.750 triệu đồng[1]Thứ trưởng Tạ Quang Đông Trịnh Thị Thủy Hoàng Đạo C�...
GlaignescomuneGlaignes – Veduta LocalizzazioneStato Francia RegioneAlta Francia Dipartimento Oise ArrondissementSenlis CantoneCrépy-en-Valois TerritorioCoordinate49°16′N 2°51′E49°16′N, 2°51′E (Glaignes) Altitudine46 e 116 m s.l.m. Superficie5,39 km² Abitanti383[1] (2009) Densità71,06 ab./km² Altre informazioniCod. postale60129 Fuso orarioUTC+1 Codice INSEE60274 CartografiaGlaignes Modifica dati su Wikidata · Manuale Glaignes è un comu...