In 1976 Christopher Hooley showed that the natural density of positive integers for which Cn is a prime is of the ordero(x) for . In that sense, almost all Cullen numbers are composite.[1] Hooley's proof was reworked by Hiromi Suyama to show that it works for any sequence of numbers n·2n + a + b where a and b are integers, and in particular also for Woodall numbers. The only known Cullen primes are those for n equal to:
Still, it is conjectured that there are infinitely many Cullen primes.
A Cullen number Cn is divisible by p = 2n − 1 if p is a prime number of the form 8k − 3; furthermore, it follows from Fermat's little theorem that if p is an odd prime, then p divides Cm(k) for each m(k) = (2k − k)
(p − 1) − k (for k > 0). It has also been shown that the prime number p divides C(p + 1)/2 when the Jacobi symbol (2 | p) is −1, and that p divides C(3p − 1)/2 when the Jacobi symbol (2 | p) is + 1.
It is unknown whether there exists a prime number p such that Cp is also prime.
Sometimes, a generalized Cullen number base b is defined to be a number of the form n·bn + 1, where n + 2 > b; if a prime can be written in this form, it is then called a generalized Cullen prime. Woodall numbers are sometimes called Cullen numbers of the second kind.[2]
As of October 2021, the largest known generalized Cullen prime is 2525532·732525532 + 1. It has 4,705,888 digits and was discovered by Tom Greer, a PrimeGrid participant.[3][4]
According to Fermat's little theorem, if there is a prime p such that n is divisible by p − 1 and n + 1 is divisible by p (especially, when n = p − 1) and p does not divide b, then bn must be congruent to 1 mod p (since bn is a power of bp − 1 and bp − 1 is congruent to 1 mod p). Thus, n·bn + 1 is divisible by p, so it is not prime. For example, if some n congruent to 2 mod 6 (i.e. 2, 8, 14, 20, 26, 32, ...), n·bn + 1 is prime, then b must be divisible by 3 (except b = 1).
The least n such that n·bn + 1 is prime (with question marks if this term is currently unknown) are[5][6]