Pykobjê and Krĩkatí differ in that Pykobjê retains the velar nasal/ŋ/ of Proto-Timbira[5] (spelt ⟨g⟩ in the orthography, as in cagã 'snake', gõr 'to sleep'), which Krĩkatí has replaced with /h/ (cahã, hõr),[2]: 22, 158 as well as in having a voiceless fricative allophone [s~ʃ] of /j/ (spelt ⟨x⟩, as in cas'pacará basket', hõhmtyx 'his/her wrist'), which occurs in the coda position only and corresponds to [j] in all other Timbira varieties, including Krĩkatí.[2]: 21
The remainder of this article describes Pykobjê specifically.
Morphology
Finiteness morphology
As in all other Northern Jê languages,[6] verbs in Pykobjê inflect for finiteness and thus have a basic opposition between a finite (or short) form and a nonfinite (or long) form. Finite forms are used in matrix non-past clauses only, whereas nonfinite forms are used in all types of subordinate clauses as well as in some matrix clauses (such as past, negated or quantified).[2]: 101 Nonfinite forms are most often formed via suffixation and/or prefix substitution. Some verbs (including all descriptives with the exception of cato ‘to leave, to arrive, to appear’, whose nonfinite form is cator) lack an overt finiteness distinction.
The following nonfinite suffixes have been attested: -r (the most common option, found in many transitive and intransitive verbs), -n (found in some transitive verbs), as well as -c, -m, and -x (found in a handful of intransitive verbs which take a nominative subject when finite).[6]: 543
Nonfinite suffixes in Pykobjê
finite
nonfinite
gloss
suffix -r
mo
mor
to go slowly
pẽh
-pẽhr
to extinguish
coh
-’cohr
to eat (a part)
cahu
cahur
to suck, to eat soft food
-’coohquehj
-’coohcjir
to ask
suffix -n
pe
-’pen
to drink up
pu
-pun
to untie
cwy
-’cwyn
to dig
-’coohpỳ
-’coohpỳn
to gnaw
-’coh’tu
-’coh’tun
to spit
suffix -c
tyh
-’tyhc
to die
ry
-ryc
to rain
suffix -m
tẽ
-’tẽm
to go (singular)
ẽhjcõ
-’cõm
to drink
xa
xãm
to stand (singular)
suffix -x
aacji
-ncjix
to enter (plural)
Prefix substitution or loss
In addition to the aforementioned processes, the finiteness inflection may involve prefix substitution or loss. For example, the valency-reducing prefixes are a(j)- (anticausative) and a(a)-, aw- (antipassive) in finite verb forms, but -pe(e)h-, -pẽh-[2]: 112 and -jỳ-,[2]: 111 /-jõh-,[2]: 144–5 respectively, in the nonfinite forms. In addition, some verbs which denote physiological activities or movement have a prefix (ehj- and aa-, respectively) in their finite forms but not in the nonfinite form. Some examples are given below.[3]
Finiteness and prefix alternations in Pykobjê
finite
nonfinite
gloss
anticausatives
axpa
-pehxpar
to grieve
axpoh
-pehxpoh
to fight
amteh
-pẽhmtehr
to dream
ampraa
-pẽhmpraa
to wake up
ajquẽ
-peehquẽn
to dance
ajcapu
-pehcapun
to split up in two
ajri
-peehrin
to get torn
antipassives
aapi
-jỳyhpin
to fish
aapi
-jỳyhpir
to blow (of wind)
aapỳ
-jỳyhpỳ
to eat
a’tip
-jỳ’tip
to come close
awjacu
-jõhjacur
to smoke
awjãarẽ
-jõhjãarẽn
to narrate
awjahi
-jõhjahir
to hunt
awcapeh
-jõhcapeh
to choose
awpa
-jõhpar
to be able to hear
awpỹ
-jõhpỹr
to be able to smell
awryh
-jõhwryh
to travel far away, to be far away
physiological verbs
ẽhjcõ
-’cõm
to drink
ẽhjtoh
-’tohr
to urinate
ẽhjcwỳ
-’cwỳr
to defecate
movement verbs
aajit
jit
to hang (singular)
aaxỳ
-xỳr
to enter (singular)
aacji
-ncjix
to enter (plural)
Derivational morphology
Productive affixes
Pykobjê widely uses the diminutive suffix -re and the augmentative suffix -teh, which may combine with nouns and descriptive predicates.[2]: 36–7
Instrumental/locative nominalizations are formed by means of the suffix -xỳ,[2]: 47 which attached to the nonfinite forms of verbs.
References
^ abSilva, Talita Rodrigues da. "Pykobjê". Biblioteca Digital Curt Nimuendajú. Retrieved 5 August 2020.
^Ribeiro-Silva, Nandra (2020). Reconstrução fonológica do Proto-Timbira (Ph.D. dissertation). Belém: Universidade Federal do Pará.
^ abNikulin, Andrey; Salanova, Andrés Pablo (October 2019). "Northern Jê Verb Morphology and the Reconstruction of Finiteness Alternations". International Journal of American Linguistics. 85 (4): 533–567. doi:10.1086/704565.