This article's lead sectionmay be too short to adequately summarize the key points. Please consider expanding the lead to provide an accessible overview of all important aspects of the article.(March 2013)
If , the number of such that and is a constant depending on , , but not on the particular choice of and .
An association scheme is commutative if for all , and . Most authors assume this property.
Note, however, that while the notion of an association scheme generalizes the notion of a group, the notion of a commutative association scheme only generalizes the notion of a commutative group.
A symmetric association scheme is one in which each is a symmetric relation. That is:
if (x, y) ∈ Ri, then (y, x) ∈ Ri. (Or equivalently, R* = R.)
Every symmetric association scheme is commutative.
Two points x and y are called i th associates if . The definition states that if x and y are i th associates then so are y and x. Every pair of points are i th associates for exactly one . Each point is its own zeroth associate while distinct points are never zeroth associates. If x and y are k th associates then the number of points which are both i th associates of and j th associates of is a constant .
Graph interpretation and adjacency matrices
A symmetric association scheme can be visualized as a complete graph with labeled edges. The graph has vertices, one for each point of , and the edge joining vertices and is labeled if and are th associates. Each edge has a unique label, and the number of triangles with a fixed base labeled having the other edges labeled and is a constant , depending on but not on the choice of the base. In particular, each vertex is incident with exactly edges labeled ; is the valency of the relation. There are also loops labeled at each vertex , corresponding to .
The relations are described by their adjacency matrices. is the adjacency matrix of for and is a v × vmatrix with rows and columns labeled by the points of .
The definition of a symmetric association scheme is equivalent to saying that the are v × v(0,1)-matrices which satisfy
I. is symmetric,
II. (the all-ones matrix),
III. ,
IV. .
The (x, y)-th entry of the left side of (IV) is the number of paths of length two between x and y with labels i and j in the graph. Note that the rows and columns of contain 's:
Terminology
The numbers are called the parameters of the scheme. They are also referred to as the structural constants.
History
The term association scheme is due to (Bose & Shimamoto 1952) but the concept is already inherent in (Bose & Nair 1939).[9] These authors were studying what statisticians have called partially balanced incomplete block designs (PBIBDs). The subject became an object of algebraic interest with the publication of (Bose & Mesner 1959) and the introduction of the Bose–Mesner algebra. The most important contribution to the theory was the thesis of P. Delsarte (Delsarte 1973) who recognized and fully used the connections with coding theory and design theory.[10] Generalizations have been studied by D. G. Higman (coherent configurations) and B. Weisfeiler (distance regular graphs).
There is another algebra of matrices which is isomorphic to , and is often easier to work with.
Examples
The Johnson scheme, denoted by J(v, k), is defined as follows. Let S be a set with v elements. The points of the scheme J(v, k) are the subsets of S with k elements. Two k-element subsets A, B of S are i th associates when their intersection has size k − i.
The Hamming scheme, denoted by H(n, q), is defined as follows. The points of H(n, q) are the qn ordered n-tuples over a set of size q. Two n-tuples x, y are said to be i th associates if they disagree in exactly i coordinates. E.g., if x = (1,0,1,1), y = (1,1,1,1), z = (0,0,1,1), then x and y are 1st associates, x and z are 1st associates and y and z are 2nd associates in H(4,2).
A distance-regular graph, G, forms an association scheme by defining two vertices to be i th associates if their distance is i.
A finite groupG yields an association scheme on , with a class Rg for each group element, as follows: for each let where is the group operation. The class of the group identity is R0. This association scheme is commutative if and only ifG is abelian.
Let A(3) be the following association scheme with three associate classes on the set X = {1,2,3,4,5,6}. The (i, j ) entry is s if elements i and j are in relation Rs.
In coding theory, association scheme theory is mainly concerned with the distance of a code. The linear programming method produces upper bounds for the size of a code with given minimum distance, and lower bounds for the size of a design with a given strength. The most specific results are obtained in the case where the underlying association scheme satisfies certain polynomial properties; this leads one into the realm of orthogonal polynomials. In particular, some universal bounds are derived for codes and designs in polynomial-type association schemes.
Bose, R. C.; Shimamoto, T. (1952), "Classification and analysis of partially balanced incomplete block designs with two associate classes", Journal of the American Statistical Association, 47 (258): 151–184, doi:10.1080/01621459.1952.10501161
Camion, P. (1998), "18. Codes and Association Schemes: Basic Properties of Association Schemes Relevant to Coding", in Pless, V.S.; Huffman, W.C.; Brualdi, R.A. (eds.), Handbook of Coding Theory, vol. 1, Elsevier, pp. 1441–, ISBN978-0-444-50088-5
Delsarte, P. (1973), "An Algebraic Approach to the Association Schemes of Coding Theory", Philips Research Reports (Supplement No. 10), OCLC641852316
Delsarte, P.; Levenshtein, V. I. (1998). "Association schemes and coding theory". IEEE Transactions on Information Theory. 44 (6): 2477–2504. doi:10.1109/18.720545.