MDA and MDMA were both first synthesized independently in the early 1910s.[22] The psychoactive effects of MDA were discovered in 1930 but were not described until the 1950s, MDA and MDMA emerged as recreational drugs in the 1960s, and the unique entactogenic effects of MDMA were first described in the 1970s.[22][23][24][25][26] Entactogens as a unique pharmacological class depending on induction of serotonin release was established in the mid-1980s and novel entactogens such as MBDB were developed at this time and after.[1][4][6]Gordon Alles discovered the psychoactive effects of MDA,[25][26]Alexander Shulgin played a key role in bringing awareness to MDMA and its unique effects,[24] and Ralph Metzner[27][28][29] and David E. Nichols formally defined entactogens and established them as a distinct class of drugs.[1][4][6] Many entactogens like MDMA are controlled substances throughout the world.[30][31]
Psychiatrists began using entactogens as psychotherapy tools in the 1970s despite the lack of clinical trials.[32] In recent years, the scientific community has been revisiting the possible therapeutic uses of entactogens. Therapeutic models using MDMA have been studied because of its entactogenic properties.[33] This type of therapy would be applicable for treating a patient who was experiencing psychological trauma such as PTSD. Traumatic memories can be linked to fear in the patients which makes engaging with these memories difficult. Administration of an entactogen such as MDMA allows the patient to disconnect from the fear associated with the traumatic memories and engage in therapy.[33] MDMA acts by targeting the body's stress response in order to cause this therapeutic effect. In addition to reducing anxiety and a conditioned fear response, MDMA also reduces the avoidance of feelings.[33] Patients are then able to trust themselves and their therapist and engage with traumatic memories under the influence of MDMA.
Although the therapeutic effects of entactogens may be promising, drugs such as MDMA have the potential for negative effects that are counter productive in a therapy setting. For example, MDMA may make negative cognition worse. This means that a positive experience is not a guarantee and can be contingent on aspects like the setting and the patient's expectations.[34] Additionally there is no clear model of the psychopharmacological means for a positive or negative experience.[34] There is also a potential concern for the neurotoxic effects of MDMA on the fiber density of serotonin neurons in the neocortex. High doses of MDMA may cause potential depletion of serotonergic axons. The same effects may not be caused by lower doses of MDMA required for treatment, however.[35]
MDMA-assisted psychotherapy (MDMA-AT) is in late-stage clinical trials to treat PTSD as of 2025.[9][10][11]
Both terms adopted and used in naming the class of therapeutic drugs for MDMA and related compounds were chosen with the intention of providing some reflection of the reported psychological effects associated with drugs in the classification and distinguishing these compounds from classical psychedelic drugs such as LSD, mescaline, and psilocybin and major stimulants, such as methamphetamine and amphetamine.[3] Chemically, MDMA is classified as a substituted amphetamine (which includes stimulants like dextroamphetamine and psychedelics like 2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylamphetamine), which makes MDMA a substituted phenethylamine (which includes other stimulants like methylphenidate and other psychedelics like mescaline) by the definition of amphetamine. While chemically related both to psychedelics and stimulants, the psychological effects experienced with MDMA were reported to provide obvious and striking aspects of personal relatedness, feelings of connectedness, communion with others, and ability to feel what others feel—in short an empathic resonance is consistently evoked.[36] While psychedelics like LSD may sometimes yield effects of empathic resonance, these effects tend to be momentary and likely passed over on the way to some other dimension or interest. In contrast, the main characteristic that distinguishes MDMA from LSD-type experiences is the consistency of the effects of emotional communion, relatedness, emotional openness—in short, empathy and sympathy.[3]
Entactogens like MDMA show a much narrower margin of safety and greater toxicity in overdose than serotonergic psychedelics.[38] Whereas LSD and psilocybin have extrapolated human lethal doses relative to typical recreational doses of approximately 1,000-fold and 200-fold, respectively,[39] a reasonable estimated fatal dose of MDMA is only about 15 or 16times a single typical recreational dose.[38]
In animals, MDMA induced prosocial behavior and elevations in circulating oxytocin levels and these effects were abolished by pretreatment with the serotonin 5-HT1A receptorantagonistWAY-100635.[45][49][50][51][52] Conversely, the serotonin 5-HT1A receptor agonist 8-OH-DPAT produced prosocial behavior and increased oxytocin levels similarly to MDMA.[45][50][53] In addition, MDMA has been shown to activate oxytocinergic neurons in the hypothalamus and this too is reversed by serotonin 5-HT1A receptor antagonism.[45][50][54] Subsequent research found that direct injection of the serotonin 5-HT1A receptor WAY-100635 locally into the basolateral amygdala (BLA) suppressed MDMA-induced prosocial behavior and that direct injection of MDMA locally into the BLA significantly increased sociability.[55][51]
The serotonin 5-HT2B and 5-HT2C receptor antagonist SB-206553 has also been found to block MDMA-induced prosocial behavior, although it produced potentially confoundingthigmotaxis (hyperactivity at periphery of testing chamber) as well.[49][52] Conversely, the serotonin 5-HT1B receptor antagonist GR-55562 and the serotonin 5-HT2A receptor antagonist ketanserin were both ineffective.[49][51][52] Likewise, another study found that selective antagonists of the serotonin 5-HT1B, 5-HT2A, 5-HT2C, and 5-HT4 receptors (SB-216641), volinanserin (MDL-100907), SB-242084, and SB-204070, respectively) were all ineffective in suppressing MDMA-induced prosocial activity.[55][51] Other research has found that serotonin 5-HT2B receptor inactivation abolishes the serotonin release induced by MDMA and attenuates many of its effects.[46][47][56] In addition to the preceding findings, induction of serotonin release by MDMA in the nucleus accumbens and consequent activation of serotonin 5-HT1B receptors in this area is implicated in its enhancement of prosocial behaviors, whereas consequent activation of yet-to-be-determined serotonin receptors in this area is implicated in its enhancement of empathy-like behaviors.[1][48][57][58] Injection of the serotonin 5-HT1B receptor antagonist NAS-181 directly into the nucleus accumbens blocked the prosocial behaviors of MDMA.[57]
On the basis of the serotonin 5-HT1A receptor-mediated oxytocin release with MDMA, it has been proposed that increased oxytocinergic signaling may mediate the prosocial effects of MDMA in animals.[45][50] Accordingly, intracerebroventricular injection of the peptideoxytocin receptor antagonisttocinoic acid blocked MDMA- and 8-OH-DPAT-induced prosocial effects.[45][50][59] However, in a subsequent study, systemically administered C25, a non-peptide oxytocin receptor antagonist, failed to affect MDMA-induced prosocial behavior, whereas the vasopressinV1A receptor antagonist relcovaptan (SR-49059) was able to block MDMA-induced prosocial activity.[45][59] It might be that tocinoic acid is non-selective and also blocks the vasopressin V1A receptor or that C25 is peripherally selective and is unable to block oxytocin receptors in the brain.[45][59] More research is needed to clarify this.[59][45] In any case, in another study, the non-peptide and centrally active selective oxytocin receptor antagonist L-368899 abolished MDMA-induced prosocial behavior.[59][60] Conversely, in other studies, different oxytocin receptor antagonists were ineffective.[57]
As in animals, MDMA greatly increases circulating oxytocin levels in humans.[45]Serotonin reuptake inhibitors and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors reduced the subjective effects of MDMA in humans, for instance increased extroversion, self-confidence, closeness, openness, and talkativeness.[12] The 5-HT2A receptor antagonist ketanserin reduced MDMA-induced increases in friendliness.[12] MDMA-induced emotional empathy was not affected by the serotonin 5-HT1A receptor antagonist pindolol or by intranasaloxytocin.[61] Similarly, MDMA-induced emotional empathy and prosocial behavior have not been associated with circulating oxytocin levels.[61][45] As such, the role of oxytocin in the entactogenic effects of MDMA in humans is controversial.[45]
The serotonin release of MDMA appears to be the key pharmacological action mediating the entactogenic, prosocial, and empathy-enhancing effects of the drug.[12][13][5] However, in addition to serotonin release, MDMA is also a potentreleasing agent of norepinephrine and dopamine, and hence acts as a well-balanced serotonin–norepinephrine–dopamine releasing agent.[13][5] Additionally, MDMA is a direct agonist of several serotonin receptors, including of the serotonin 5-HT2 receptors, with moderate affinity.[13][5] These actions are thought to play an important role in the effects of MDMA, including in its psychostimulant, euphoriant, and mild psychedelic effects, as well as in its unique and difficult-to-replicate "magic".[13][14][5][72] It has been said by Matthew Baggott that few to no MDMA analogues, including MBDB, methylone, 6-APDB, 5-APDB, 6-APB, 5-APB, MDAT, and MDAI among others, reproduce the full quality and "magic" of MDMA.[14][15] Exceptions may anecdotally include 5-MAPB, particularly in specific enantiomer ratios, and the Borax combo.[14][15][73] The unique properties of MDMA are believed to be dependent on a very specific mixture and ratio of pharmacological activities, including combined serotonin, norepinephrine, and dopamine release and direct serotonin receptor agonism.[14][15]
Ariadne, the α-ethylanalogue of the serotonergic psychedelic DOM, fully substitutes for MDMA in rodent drug discrimination tests, suggesting that it may have entactogen-like effects.[74][75] This property is unusual among psychedelics, and is in notable contrast to DOM, which at best partially substitutes for MDMA.[75][76] Besides Ariadne, the NBOMe drugs such as 25I-NBOMe and 25B-NBOMe also partially to fully substitute for MDMA in rodents.[77][78][79][80] Unlike conventional entactogens, Ariadne shows no activity at the monoamine transporters, and instead acts as a selective serotonin 5-HT2 receptor partial agonist, including as a lower-efficacy agonist of the serotonin 5-HT2A receptor.[74] Certain other psychedelics and related compounds, like low doses of 2C-B, are also selective serotonin 5-HT2 receptor partial agonists that have likewise been implicated as having entactogenic effects.[37][81][82] MDMA itself is notable in being a lower-efficacy partial agonist of the serotonin 5-HT2A receptor as well.[83][84] The stimulus effects of MDMA in the drug discrimination paradigm are partially blocked by the selective serotonin 5-HT2A receptor antagonist volinanserin in rodents.[85] Similarly, the psychoactive effects of MDMA are partially blocked by the relatively selective serotonin 5-HT2A receptor antagonist ketanserin in humans.[13][86][87][88]
The term empathogen, meaning "generating a state of empathy", was coined by Ralph Metzner in 1983 as a term to denote a class of drugs that includes MDMA and other agents with similar effects.[27][28][29] Subsequently, in 1986, Nichols rejected this initial terminology and adopted, instead, the term entactogen, meaning "producing a touching within", to denote this class of drugs, asserting a concern with the potential for improper association of the term empathogen with negative connotations related to the Greek root πάθος páthos ("suffering; passion").[1][4][6] Additionally, Nichols wanted to avoid any association with the term pathogenesis.[91]
Nichols also thought the original term was limiting, and did not cover other therapeutic uses for the drugs that go beyond instilling feelings of empathy.[3] The hybrid wordentactogen is derived from the roots en (Greek: within), tactus (Latin: touch) and -gen (Greek: produce).[4] Entactogen is not becoming dominant in usage, and, despite their difference in connotation, they are essentially interchangeable, as they refer to precisely the same chemicals.
In 2024, an additional alternative term, connectogen, was proposed and introduced by Kurt Stocker and Matthias Liechti.[2]
^ abcdeNichols D, Yensen R, Metzner R, Shakespeare W (1993). "The Great Entactogen-Empathogen Debate"(PDF). Newsletter of the Multidisciplinary Association for Psychedelic Studies. 4 (2): 47–49.
^ abcdefgNichols, D. (1986). "Differences Between the Mechanism of Action of MDMA, MBDB, and the Classic Hallucinogens. Identification of a New Therapeutic Class: Entactogens". Journal of Psychoactive Drugs. 18 (4): 305–13. doi:10.1080/02791072.1986.10472362. PMID2880944.
^ abcdNichols DE, Hoffman AJ, Oberlender RA, Jacob P, Shulgin AT (October 1986). "Derivatives of 1-(1,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)-2-butanamine: representatives of a novel therapeutic class". J Med Chem. 29 (10): 2009–2015. doi:10.1021/jm00160a035. PMID3761319.
^McGregor, Iain S.; Thompson, Murray R.; Callaghan, Paul D. (2010-01-01). Stolerman, Ian P. (ed.). Encyclopedia of Psychopharmacology. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. pp. 758–762. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-68706-1_154. ISBN9783540686989.
^ abParrott AC (April 2002). "Recreational Ecstasy/MDMA, the serotonin syndrome, and serotonergic neurotoxicity". Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 71 (4): 837–844. doi:10.1016/s0091-3057(01)00711-0. PMID11888574.
^ abParrott AC (September 2013). "MDMA, serotonergic neurotoxicity, and the diverse functional deficits of recreational 'Ecstasy' users". Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 37 (8): 1466–1484. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.04.016. PMID23660456.
^ abAguilar MA, García-Pardo MP, Parrott AC (January 2020). "Of mice and men on MDMA: A translational comparison of the neuropsychobiological effects of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine ('Ecstasy')". Brain Res. 1727 146556. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2019.146556. PMID31734398.
^ abBernschneider-Reif S, Oxler F, Freudenmann RW (November 2006). "The origin of MDMA ("ecstasy")--separating the facts from the myth". Pharmazie. 61 (11): 966–972. PMID17152992.
^ abcBenzenhöfer U, Passie T (August 2010). "Rediscovering MDMA (ecstasy): the role of the American chemist Alexander T. Shulgin". Addiction. 105 (8): 1355–61. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.02948.x. PMID20653618.
^ abMetzner, Ralph; Adamson, Sophia (2001). "Using MDMA in Healing, Psychotherapy, and Spiritual Practice". In Holland, J. (ed.). Ecstasy: The Complete Guide: A Comprehensive Look at the Risks and Benefits of MDMA. Inner Traditions/Bear. pp. 182–207. ISBN978-0-89281-857-0. The term "empathogenic," meaning "generating a state of empathy," was independently proposed for these substances in 1983—84 by Ralph Metzner, a psychologist and psychopharmacologist, and David Nichols, a professor of medicinal chemistry at Purdue University. Nichols subsequently rejected the term and now prefers "entactogenic," meaning "touching within," for MDMA. We continue to use the term "empathogenic."
^ abRalph Metzner (May 1983). [Lecture presented at the Psychedelics and Spirituality Conference]. Psychedelics and Spirituality, University of California, Santa Barbara, May 13–14, 1983. Another group of drugs are the phenethylamines, of which MDA [and MDMA] is an example. Instead of calling these "psychedelic drugs," I'd like to suggest the name "empathogenic." Empathogenic means "empathy generating." Everyone I've mentioned this name to thinks it is a good one. These drugs don't produce visions as LSD does. They don't produce multileveled thinking or objectivity toward your mind as LSD and the psychedelics do. They generate a profound state of empathy for self and other in the most general and profound terms. A state of empathy where the feeling is that the self, the other, and the world is basically good, is all right. This state can be referred to as the ground of being, the core of our being, a still point of our being. Then individuals using these substances in therapy can look at their own problems from the standpoint of stillness and empathy. They are able to do changework on themselves very rapidly, compared to ordinary therapy.
^F., Quenzer, Linda (2013-05-06). Psychopharmacology : drugs, the brain, and behavior. Sinauer. ISBN9780878935109. OCLC869923492.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
^Metzner, Ralph (1993). "Letter from Ralph Metzner". Newsletter of the Multidisciplinary Association for Psychedelic Studies MAPS. 4 (1). Retrieved 8 January 2015.
^ abLuethi D, Liechti ME (April 2020). "Designer drugs: mechanism of action and adverse effects". Arch Toxicol. 94 (4): 1085–1133. Bibcode:2020ArTox..94.1085L. doi:10.1007/s00204-020-02693-7. PMC7225206. PMID32249347. In one of the few clinical studies of a designer drug, 4-bromo-2,5-dimethoxyphenylethylamine (2C-B) was shown to induce euphoria, well-being, and changes in perception, and to have mild stimulant properties (Gonzalez et al. 2015). 2C-B may thus be classified as a psychedelic with entactogenic properties, an effect profile that is similar to various other phenethylamine psychedelics (Shulgin and Shulgin 1995).
^Papaseit E, Pérez-Mañá C, Torrens M, Farré A, Poyatos L, Hladun O, Sanvisens A, Muga R, Farré M (May 2020). "MDMA interactions with pharmaceuticals and drugs of abuse". Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 16 (5): 357–369. doi:10.1080/17425255.2020.1749262. PMID32228243.
^Mohamed WM, Ben Hamida S, Cassel JC, de Vasconcelos AP, Jones BC (October 2011). "MDMA: interactions with other psychoactive drugs". Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 99 (4): 759–774. doi:10.1016/j.pbb.2011.06.032. PMID21756931.
^ abMartinez-Price, Diana; Krebs-Thomson, Kirsten; Geyer, Mark (1 January 2002). "Behavioral Psychopharmacology of MDMA and MDMA-Like Drugs: A Review of Human and Animal Studies". Addiction Research & Theory. 10 (1). Informa UK Limited: 43–67. doi:10.1080/16066350290001704. ISSN1606-6359.
^ abStove CP, De Letter EA, Piette MH, Lambert WE (August 2010). "Mice in ecstasy: advanced animal models in the study of MDMA". Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 11 (5): 421–433. doi:10.2174/138920110791591508. PMID20420576.
^ abcBlanco-Gandía MC, Mateos-García A, García-Pardo MP, Montagud-Romero S, Rodríguez-Arias M, Miñarro J, Aguilar MA (September 2015). "Effect of drugs of abuse on social behaviour: a review of animal models". Behav Pharmacol. 26 (6): 541–570. doi:10.1097/FBP.0000000000000162. PMID26221831.
^ abcdeThompson MR, Callaghan PD, Hunt GE, Cornish JL, McGregor IS (May 2007). "A role for oxytocin and 5-HT(1A) receptors in the prosocial effects of 3,4 methylenedioxymethamphetamine ("ecstasy")". Neuroscience. 146 (2): 509–514. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2007.02.032. PMID17383105.
^ abcMorley KC, Arnold JC, McGregor IS (June 2005). "Serotonin (1A) receptor involvement in acute 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) facilitation of social interaction in the rat". Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 29 (5): 648–657. doi:10.1016/j.pnpbp.2005.04.009. PMID15908091.
^Tan O, Martin LJ, Bowen MT (July 2020). "Divergent pathways mediate 5-HT1A receptor agonist effects on close social interaction, grooming and aggressive behaviour in mice: Exploring the involvement of the oxytocin and vasopressin systems". J Psychopharmacol. 34 (7): 795–805. doi:10.1177/0269881120913150. PMID32312154.
^Hunt GE, McGregor IS, Cornish JL, Callaghan PD (August 2011). "MDMA-induced c-Fos expression in oxytocin-containing neurons is blocked by pretreatment with the 5-HT-1A receptor antagonist WAY 100635". Brain Res Bull. 86 (1–2): 65–73. doi:10.1016/j.brainresbull.2011.06.011. PMID21745546.
^Behera HK, Joga R, Yerram S, Karnati P, Mergu T, Gandhi K, M S, Nathiya D, Singh RP, Srivastava S, Kumar S (September 2024). "Exploring the regulatory framework of psychedelics in the US & Europe". Asian J Psychiatr. 102 104242. doi:10.1016/j.ajp.2024.104242. PMID39305768.
^Aman MG, Kern RA (July 1989). "Review of fenfluramine in the treatment of the developmental disabilities". J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 28 (4): 549–565. doi:10.1097/00004583-198907000-00014. PMID2670881.
^de Boer SF, Koolhaas JM (December 2005). "5-HT1A and 5-HT1B receptor agonists and aggression: a pharmacological challenge of the serotonin deficiency hypothesis". Eur J Pharmacol. 526 (1–3): 125–139. doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2005.09.065. PMID16310183.
^ abCunningham MJ, Bock HA, Serrano IC, Bechand B, Vidyadhara DJ, Bonniwell EM, Lankri D, Duggan P, Nazarova AL, Cao AB, Calkins MM, Khirsariya P, Hwu C, Katritch V, Chandra SS, McCorvy JD, Sames D (January 2023). "Pharmacological Mechanism of the Non-hallucinogenic 5-HT2A Agonist Ariadne and Analogs". ACS Chemical Neuroscience. 14 (1): 119–135. doi:10.1021/acschemneuro.2c00597. PMC10147382. PMID36521179. In rat drug discrimination assays, Ariadne substituted responding in LSD trained animals in one study, in another showed full substitution for MDMA stimulus.14,15 [...] 15). Glennon RA MDMA-like Stimulus Effects of α-Ethyltryptamine and the α-Ethyl Homolog of Dom. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior 1993, 46 (2), 459–462. [PubMed: 7903460]
^ abGlennon RA (October 1993). "MDMA-like stimulus effects of alpha-ethyltryptamine and the alpha-ethyl homolog of DOM". Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 46 (2): 459–462. doi:10.1016/0091-3057(93)90379-8. PMID7903460.
^Oberlender RA (May 1989). "Stereoselective aspects of hallucinogenic drug action and drug discrimination studies of entactogens". Purdue e-Pubs. Purdue University. The results of initial studies (Nichols et al., 1986) generally demonstrated the lack of LSD-Iike discriminative stimulus properties for the members of the entactogen drug class. This was confirmed and extended to other hallucinogens in tests with rats trained on entactogens. These results are summarized in Table 12. Table 12. Results of DD tests comparing entactogens and hallucinogens. [...] It seems clear that entactogen activity is distinct from that of hallucinogens. [...]
^Herian M, Świt P (January 2023). "25X-NBOMe compounds - chemistry, pharmacology and toxicology. A comprehensive review". Crit Rev Toxicol. 53 (1): 15–33. doi:10.1080/10408444.2023.2194907. PMID37115704. For a better understanding of the actions of different NBOMes resulting from their molecular structure and receptor binding affinity, drug discrimination studies were performed. Animals trained with 4-methyl-2,5-dimethoxyamphetamine (DOM) and 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) were used in the drug discrimination paradigm. 25B- and 25CNBOMe completely (80%) substituted DOM, while 25INBOMe produced 74% drug-appropriate responding (Gatch et al. 2017). On the other hand, only 25B-NBOMe fully substituted for MDMA, suggesting that this compound could be used as both a hallucinogen and an entactogen.
^Zawilska JB, Kacela M, Adamowicz P (2020). "NBOMes-Highly Potent and Toxic Alternatives of LSD". Front Neurosci. 14: 78. doi:10.3389/fnins.2020.00078. PMC7054380. PMID32174803. Gatch et al. (2017) tested 25B-NBOMe, 25C-NBOMe, and 25I-NBOMe for discriminative stimulus effects similar to a prototypical psychedelic/hallucinogen DOM and to an empathogen, 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA). In DOM-trained rats 25B-NBOMe and 25C-NBOMe, but not 25I-NBOMe, fully substituted for this drug. 25B-NBOMe also fully substituted for MDMA. In both tests, the dose-effect curves for 25B-NBOMe had an inverted U-shape. It is suggested that 25B-NBOMe and 25C-NBOMe are most likely used as recreational psychedelics, although 25B-NBOMe may also be used as an empathogenic compound (Gatch et al., 2017). However, the latter assumption should be taken with caution, as some compounds (e.g., fenfluramine) that substitute for MDMA in rats do not produce MDMA-like empathogenic effects in humans (Schechter, 1988).
^Wills B, Erickson T (9 March 2012). "Psychoactive Phenethylamine, Piperazine, and Pyrrolidinophenone Derivatives". In Barceloux DG (ed.). Medical Toxicology of Drug Abuse: Synthesized Chemicals and Psychoactive Plants. Wiley. pp. 156–192. doi:10.1002/9781118105955.ch10. ISBN978-0-471-72760-6. DOSE EFFECT: Anecdotal data suggests that recreational doses of 2C-B range from 4—30 mg with lower doses (4—10 mg) producing entactogenic effects, whereas high doses (10— 20 mg) cause psychedelic and sympathomimetic effects.
^Liechti ME, Saur MR, Gamma A, Hell D, Vollenweider FX (October 2000). "Psychological and physiological effects of MDMA ("Ecstasy") after pretreatment with the 5-HT(2) antagonist ketanserin in healthy humans". Neuropsychopharmacology. 23 (4): 396–404. doi:10.1016/S0893-133X(00)00126-3. PMID10989266.
^Liechti ME, Vollenweider FX (December 2001). "Which neuroreceptors mediate the subjective effects of MDMA in humans? A summary of mechanistic studies". Hum Psychopharmacol. 16 (8): 589–598. doi:10.1002/hup.348. PMID12404538.
^Shulgin AT (1990). "History of MDMA". In Peroutka SJ (ed.). Ecstasy: The Clinical, Pharmacological and Neurotoxicological Effects of the Drug MDMA. Topics in the Neurosciences. Vol. 9. Boston, MA: Springer US. pp. 1–20. doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-1485-1_1. ISBN978-1-4612-8799-5. Retrieved 15 May 2025.
^Pentney AR (2001). "An exploration of the history and controversies surrounding MDMA and MDA". J Psychoactive Drugs. 33 (3): 213–221. doi:10.1080/02791072.2001.10400568. PMID11718314.