Here refers to the standard Euclidean dot product in . The Gaussian measure of the translation of by a vector is
So under translation through , the Gaussian measure scales by the distribution function appearing in the last display:
The measure that associates to the set the number is the pushforward measure, denoted . Here refers to the translation map: . The above calculation shows that the Radon–Nikodym derivative of the pushforward measure with respect to the original Gaussian measure is given by
The abstract Wiener measure on a separableBanach space, where is an abstract Wiener space, is also a "Gaussian measure" in a suitable sense. How does it change under translation? It turns out that a similar formula to the one above holds if we consider only translations by elements of the densesubspace.
Statement of the theorem
For abstract wiener spaces
Let be an abstract Wiener space with abstract Wiener measure . For , define by . Then is equivalent to with Radon–Nikodym derivative
The Cameron–Martin formula is valid only for translations by elements of the dense subspace , called Cameron–Martin space, and not by arbitrary elements of . If the Cameron–Martin formula did hold for arbitrary translations, it would contradict the following result:
If is a separable Banach space and is a locally finite Borel measure on that is equivalent to its own push forward under any translation, then either has finite dimension or is the trivial (zero) measure. (See quasi-invariant measure.)
In fact, is quasi-invariant under translation by an element if and only if. Vectors in are sometimes known as Cameron–Martin directions.
More general version
Consider a locally convex vector space with a cylindrical Gaussian measure on it. For an element in the topological dual define the distance to the mean
The Cameron–Martin formula gives rise to an integration by parts formula on : if has boundedFréchet derivative, integrating the Cameron–Martin formula with respect to Wiener measure on both sides gives
for any . Formally differentiating with respect to and evaluating at gives the integration by parts formula
where is the constant "vector field" for all . The wish to consider more general vector fields and to think of stochastic integrals as "divergences" leads to the study of stochastic processes and the Malliavin calculus, and, in particular, the Clark–Ocone theorem and its associated integration by parts formula.
An application
Using Cameron–Martin theorem one may establish (See Liptser and Shiryayev 1977, p. 280) that for a symmetric non-negative definite matrix whose elements are continuous and satisfy the condition
where is a nonpositive definite matrix which is a unique solution of the matrix-valued Riccati differential equation
with the boundary condition .
In the special case of a one-dimensional Brownian motion where , the unique solution is , and we have the original formula as established by Cameron and Martin: