Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by I dream of horses was:

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Species of what kind of insect?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Megalodacne grandipennis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

I dream of horses ^{(Contribs) (Talk)} 21:36, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Memer15151! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 21:36, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Megalodacne grandipennis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Dan arndt (talk) 07:00, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Megalodacne varia.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 15:31, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Memer15151. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Neopriotelus, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:02, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to FC Lorentzweiler. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CycloneYoris ^talk! 00:34, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Taxonomy templates are never needed for species. A species article uses {{Speciesbox}} which then uses the genus name to find the parent taxon. Peter coxhead (talk) 03:12, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, my bad. Do you wish for the template to be deleted? Memer15151 (talk) 03:15, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It will be eventually – the custom is to put unneeded taxonomy templates into Category:Unnecessary taxonomy templates which is cleaned up from time to time. Peter coxhead (talk) 03:24, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks for bringing this to my attention. Memer15151 (talk) 03:26, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm WikiDan61. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Elementary arithmetic have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 15:45, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Neopriotelus, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

NotAGenious (talk) 15:46, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Pages using WikiProject Fossorials with unknown parameters indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:02, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Contested, it's a maintenance category for a WikiProject. Memer15151 (talk) 18:12, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Fossorial articles without taxoboxes indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:23, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:FA-Class Fossorials articles indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:23, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Contested yet again UserMemer (chat) Tribs 18:49, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Oltrepier was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Sorry, but I don't think this draft meets the WP:GNG criteria... Also, sources like Transfermarkt and Livescore should usually be avoided, due to their user-generated structure.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:FC Lorentzweiler and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Oltrepier (talk) 11:23, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Removal-warn has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:24, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Template:175p, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:02, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Template:Sizeimage, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:16, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Perothops you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Fritzmann2002 -- Fritzmann2002 (talk) 22:43, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of fossorials is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fossorials until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Elmidae (talk · contribs) 17:31, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Memer15151. Thank you for your work on Goldberg Combat. Sam Sailor, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

I'm perhaps overlooking something, could you point me to sources that name the Combat of Goldberg the Goldberg Combat? Thanks. (please ping on reply)

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Sam Sailor}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Sam Sailor 21:30, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Sam Sailor: sorry for the late response. I don't see any sources for my redirect, and since I'm the only contributor, I'll just G7 it. UserMemer (chat) Tribs 01:46, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Perothops you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Perothops for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Fritzmann2002 -- Fritzmann2002 (talk) 03:40, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jada Kingdom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jamaican. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 05:48, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Memer15151. Thank you for your work on 1539 in France. MPGuy2824, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

see if it is appropriate to include Château de Saint-Germain-en-Laye in this list

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:07, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@MPGuy2824: I have found a reliable source (University of Notre Dame) stating that it was rebuilt in 1539. I have decided to include it. UserMemer (chat) Tribs 23:52, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes#Requirements to accept an edit, when to accept an edit
  

DanCherek (talk) 20:12, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Perothopinae at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 04:02, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thank you for your contributions on Iatan, Texas. I looked over the article, and I noticed that there are elements of close paraphrasing. Even if it does not match the exact wording of the source, using nearly-identical phrasing and structure can still be plagiarism in some cases. It's important that you collect the information and write it entirely in your own words. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 21:44, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect ~( 8^(I) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 11 § ~( 8^(I) until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 04:52, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Fossorials, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Fossorials and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:WikiProject Fossorials during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Mach61 18:20, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Pages using WikiProject Fossorials with unknown parameters has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Harryboyles 11:34, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Memer15151. Thank you for your work on Iatan, Texas. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 21:11, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WikiProject Fossorials has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 17:52, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:User WikiProject Fossorials has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 17:52, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Memer15151. Thank you for your work on Christian Kyrou. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 17:23, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Megalodacne grandipennis feeding on fungi.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much for approving the GuideGeek page! Would you potentially be interested in editing/approving this related page for Matador Network? Draft:Matador Network Caffrey, Neil (talk) 00:31, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes; I have accepted the draft and it is in the mainspace now. I will perform a quick cleanup now. Thank you for contributing to the encyclopedia! UserMemer (chat) Tribs 15:08, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Really appreciate it. Caffrey, Neil (talk) 15:57, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I have updated more references total 15 number of references, which clearly suggests that Omprakash Mohanty is an acclaimed Music Composer who deserves an Wikipedia Page. Even have mentioned Wiki pages which mentions him as a music director. Please publish the page now 182.156.152.109 (talk) 04:59, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Sadly, your draft is not ready for the mainspace yet; I have left a comment on the draft explaining why.

"YouTube is still cited in the majority of inline citations; the addition of Wikipedia articles as refs is prohibited (see this). Also, please change the bare links to be formatted like the inline citations (although you don't have to make them inline citations, just make it so they have a title/author if applicable because that would increase your chances)."

UserMemer (chat) Tribs 12:59, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Apologies if I am bothering you but I want to know what better way I can fix my article of Opera Orlando. You see I am volunteering there, and I have tried to publish this article two times before and I thought that I followed the advice that the previous reviewers gave me. I thought I edited it correctly. But how many sources do I need to publish this article? What would you recommend that I would need to add or to cut? Again, sorry to inconvenience you, I just want to have this article be published without it getting deleted because of my incompetence. Bluebox57 (talk) 20:18, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would recommend finding more citations for the Programs and Missions sections. Look for paragraphs that are unreferenced. Can you find a source that supports the information? If not, you should delete it, or, if it is in a source you already have, you can name the reference and reuse it (see WP:REPEATCITE). Also, look at WP:PEACOCK for promotional words to watch. UserMemer (chat) Tribs 20:29, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the recommendations. Bluebox57 (talk) 20:33, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! If you want it to be neater you can look at some of the manual of style guidelines. Also, drafts aren't checked for notabilty, so you won't have to worry about deletion unless you don't edit it in 6 months. UserMemer (chat) Tribs 20:41, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

sorry to bother you, again. This may be a dumb question but am I allowed to use the company website as a source for the Wikipedia article or does that not count as an independent source. I just wanted to make sure. Either way, thank you and I hope this message finds you well. Bluebox57 (talk) 22:13, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can use the source for uncontroversial claims. It will not be counted towards notability, but as long as it is an uncontroversial self-description unlikely to be challenged, it can be kept. For example, if the page says when the company was founded, that would be fine, although, if independent sources are available, they should accompany or replace the company's self-description. But, if it was a claim, say, that "in revenue, we make millions of dollars", you should find a secondary, independent source that states that. That claim could be challenged and removed if no independent sources are used. See WP:ORGIND for more information. UserMemer (chat) Tribs 22:21, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So does this mean I can use them as a source when I describe their programs. Bluebox57 (talk) 22:28, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Most of the content in the "Programs" section seems uncontroversial, although I see some neutral point of view issues. Two examples I found were "Opera Orlando contributes to the community of Central Florida community year-round with their production and educational programs" and "Opera Orlando gives back to the community through in-school opera previews, masterclasses with company artists, and invitations to dress rehearsals for MainStage productions." "Gives back to the community" and "contributes to the community" are too positive and you should just state the facts. Independent sources are preferred if you want to make this draft more notable, but I don't think the information in that section would be challenged. You can't use the company itself for claims of other organizations or people sponsoring the company, remember, self-descriptions only. So, yes, you can, but if you can find other sources, I recommend using them; add my suggestions and that'll be fine. UserMemer (chat) Tribs 22:39, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have just noticed that in your first comment, you stated you are volunteering with the company. I seem to have overlooked this. Before submitting, you need to state your conflict of interest (see WP:DISCLOSE). UserMemer (chat) Tribs 22:41, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I hope this message finds you well and that you’re not too busy. I wanted to confirm that I’ve noted my conflict of interest in the draft and included the company website, Opera Orlando, as a reference for the programs. I’ve also added details on the company’s annual events. Do you think I'm good to go, or would you suggest any further adjustments? Bluebox57 (talk) 19:46, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I do notice a few uncited paragraphs that could benefit from some sources. You can reuse a source as much as you want as long as it contains the information it is referencing (assuming the source is reliable). You only really need one citation per paragraph. Once you do that, I think your article will be ready for submission; I do notice a few grammar issues or typos, but you don't have to fix them for it to be accepted. UserMemer (chat) Tribs 20:15, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, sorry to bother you. I hope you’re doing well. I recently added some references to the article, including the "About Us" page from the Opera Orlando website. Would you consider this a reliable source that aligns with Wikipedia’s standards? Additionally, do you have any recommendations for further adjustments, or do you believe the article is ready for publication? Thank you for your time and guidance! Bluebox57 (talk) 18:15, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, in the context in which the sources were added, they are reliable sources. Some sentences in the article could benefit from a fix in grammar, and I have just fixed it now. I also removed a sentence which I couldn't find a source for, but I don't know where you got most of the "Seasons" section from. Just add a reliable source, even if it's the company's website. After that, I think you won't have any issues, but it's always nice to get a fresh look at an article from a different person, so I'll leave the next review to someone else. Good luck!

(P.S, I won't be available for the rest of the weekend.) UserMemer (chat) Tribs 12:53, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your help! Enjoy your weekend. Bluebox57 (talk) 21:31, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Memer15151 and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:

• Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
• The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can watchlist it if you are interested, or you can add it directly to your user page by copying the following: {{WPMILHIST Announcements}}.
• The project Academy has lots of useful information about editing and writing military history articles. One very useful introductory course to get you started is Writing a good stub.
• Important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
• The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, writing contests, and article logistics.
• We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
• We've developed a set of guidelines that cover article structure and content, template use, categorization, and many other issues of interest.
• If you're looking for something to work on, there are many articles that need attention, as well as a number of review alerts.
• If you would like to receive the project's monthly newsletter, The Bugle, please sign up here.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any of the project coordinators or any other experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome, and we are looking forward to seeing you around! Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 10:22, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Holy See–Syria relations deleted G6. P{lease proceed with draft acceptance. -- Whpq (talk) 16:55, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have moved the draft and the new page is now in the mainspace. UserMemer (chat) Tribs 17:48, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, welcome, welcome Memer15151! I'm glad that you are joining the November 2024 drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.

Cielquiparle (talk) 12:37, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You should be able to accept the AfC submission now. ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him)^{Talk to Me!} 16:08, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Moved to mainspace. UserMemer (chat) Tribs 16:12, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ben McKay (actor) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article has no substantive references, and I have not been able to find decent reliable sources to establish or support the subject’s notability. A previous AfD consensus was to delete.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SunloungerFrog (talk) 15:11, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2024! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Nominations are open here and here respectively. The nomination period closes at 23:59 on 30 November 2024 when voting begins. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. MediaWiki message delivery via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:21, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Youth in the United Kingdom, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages English and Public schools.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The draft has been reject because the memer15151 thinks that the person with name Mr. Devendra Kothe is not notable. The explanation for the same is the aforementioned person is a known corporator from Solapur area & is definitely going to win upcoming elections scheduled on 20-Nov-2024 as per the all the surveys.

Almost all MLAs from India have a Wikipedia page, if they do have why can't Mr. Kothe have it? Mohit Gandmal (talk) 19:02, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I can understand your frustration. However, your submission does not seem to meet WP:NPOL or the WP:GNG at this time. There are not enough sources that are independent, reliable, and in-depth. Furthermore, the subject has not been elected into a major political office, and does not seem to have significant coverage from historians or the press. UserMemer (chat) Tribs 13:47, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In addition, the section about Coronavirus needs more citations; it also reads a bit too promotional for an encyclopedia article. UserMemer (chat) Tribs 13:53, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Memer15151. Thank you for your work on Pioneer Farms. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating the article! Have a wonderful and blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 07:29, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2024! The top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Cast your votes here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2024. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. MediaWiki message delivery via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:59, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Memer15151, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the new page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to the page curation tools and can start patrolling pages from the new pages feed. If you asked for this at requests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.

This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at Wikipedia:New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:

• Add Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers to your watchlist to follow NPP-related discussions
• If you use Twinkle, configure it to log your CSDs and PRODs
• If you can read any languages other than English, add yourself to the list of reviewers with language proficiencies

You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone! _signed, Rosguill ^talk 23:24, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2025 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol
On 1 January 2025, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin in hopes of addressing the growing backlog. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Each article review will earn 1 point, while each redirect review will earn 0.2 points. Streak awards will be given out based on consistently hitting point thresholds for each week of the drive. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:53, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		The Articles for Creation Barnstar 2024 Top Editor
		In 2024 you were one of the top AfC editors, thank you! --Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 14:09, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]