The user behind this range you blocked has returned to this IP address. Left guide (talk) 07:19, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240622071900","author":"Left guide","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Left_guide-20240622071900-Abuser_is_back","replies":["c-Florentyna-20240629045200-Left_guide-20240622071900"]}}-->
The third round of the 2024 WikiCup ended on 28 June. As with Round 2, this round was competitive: each of the 16 contestants who advanced to Round 4 scored at least 256 points.
The following editors all scored more than 400 points in Round 3:
The full scores for round 3 can be seen here. So far this year, competitors have gotten 28 featured articles, 38 featured lists, 240 good articles, 92 in the news credits, and at least 285 did you know credits. They have conducted 279 featured article reviews, as well as 492 good article reviews and peer reviews, and have added 22 articles to featured topics and good topics.
Remember that any content promoted after 28 June but before the start of Round 4 can be claimed during Round 4, which starts on 1 July at 00:00 (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether for a good article, featured content, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.
If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please see this page. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:30, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240629213000","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20240629213000-WikiCup_2024_July_newsletter","replies":[]}}-->
Just the edit summary, not the edit: [2]. Self-explanatory, I think. CMD (talk) 05:11, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240701051100","author":"Chipmunkdavis","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Chipmunkdavis-20240701051100-Revdel_request","replies":[],"displayName":"CMD"}}-->
I've left a note at the U.S. 250th birthday about keeping the wonderful gif as its lead image. Given the quality of the gif, its defining attributes per the page topic which other images would have a hard time matching, and the fact that it's from the official Commission itself which is overseeing the 250th (as far as I know nobody from the Commission has complained that it is being misused). let's try to save this one. Thanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 13:47, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240701134700","author":"Randy Kryn","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Randy_Kryn-20240701134700-U.S._250th_gif","replies":["c-Red-tailed_hawk-20240702032100-Randy_Kryn-20240701134700"]}}-->
11,000 links to update! I have decided that this was a terrible idea, and we should both be trouted - you for proposing it, and me for closing it. (I haven't moved the article yet; I'm going to wait till all the links are updated) BilledMammal (talk) 07:01, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240703070100","author":"BilledMammal","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-BilledMammal-20240703070100-ABC_News_RM","replies":["c-Red-tailed_hawk-20240704001500-BilledMammal-20240703070100"]}}-->
I am rather confused as to how you decided I want Pbritti to renounce the Catholic faith. Did someone tell you this? Elinruby (talk) 02:34, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240704023400","author":"Elinruby","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Elinruby-20240704023400-Can_you_please_explain_your_action","replies":["c-Elinruby-20240704023600-Elinruby-20240704023400","c-Red-tailed_hawk-20240704024300-Elinruby-20240704023400"]}}-->
answered the question about his affiliations with the Catholic Church
Just clarifying that you didn't get the notification because you've commented, you received a notification because since that comment a discussion you are involved in was added to the scope of the case. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 03:28, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240704032800","author":"Horse Eye's Back","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Horse_Eye's_Back-20240704032800-Clarification","replies":["c-Red-tailed_hawk-20240704032800-Horse_Eye's_Back-20240704032800"]}}-->
I moved my comment *back* to where Headbomb had moved it from.
I also disagree on how appropriate the hatting was, given the unproductive nature of the hatted remarks. Maybe you can explain that to me . At your leisure. For now, it is 40 degrees here and I have had endless edit conflicts just getting that much in, so I am wandering off to stand under the garden hose. Elinruby (talk) 03:04, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240711030400","author":"Elinruby","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Elinruby-20240711030400-I_think_you_missed_something","replies":["c-Red-tailed_hawk-20240711031300-Elinruby-20240711030400"]}}-->
The Noleander clarification request, in which you may have been involved, has been closed and archived. The request was related to that case's principle 9, which states:
Editors are expected to refrain from making unnecessary references to the actual or perceived racial, religious, or ethnic background of fellow editors. Such references should be made only if they clearly serve a legitimate purpose. In the context of a noticeboard discussion or dispute resolution, it will rarely serve a valid purpose to seek to classify the participants in the discussion on this basis.
Among the participating Arbitrators, there was a rough consensus that this principle remains true with current policies and guidelines and that there is not an exemption from this principle for asserting that an editor has a conflict of interest. For the Arbitration Committee, SilverLocust 💬 05:40, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240712054000","author":"SilverLocust","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-SilverLocust-20240712054000-Clarification_request_closed","replies":[]}}-->
Hello, Red-tailed hawk. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Wing-T".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 14:00, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240712140000","author":"Explicit","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Explicit-20240712140000-Your_draft_article,_Draft:Wing-T_(American_football)","replies":[],"displayName":"\u2717"}}-->
Seems like a mildly unfair ban. I fully understand the rules, and please see the link I posted to the talk page of nableezy if that's what you're referring to. I would appeal if I had wanted to. I think its pretty clear to anyone who reads my full statement that I understand the rules, specifically after a clarification was made which was not readily understandable previously. No hard feelings though :) JoeJShmo💌 02:16, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240718021600","author":"JoeJShmo","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-JoeJShmo-20240718021600-topic_ban","replies":["c-Red-tailed_hawk-20240718022700-JoeJShmo-20240718021600"]}}-->
[4] Am I missing something or will this editor never get it? Doug Weller talk 07:37, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240718073700","author":"Doug Weller","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Doug_Weller-20240718073700-What_in_the?","replies":["c-Doug_Weller-20240718091200-Doug_Weller-20240718073700"]}}-->
Lokasi Pengunjung: 18.117.101.40