I agree to the edit counter opt-in terms.

Archives

Archive 1

Archive 2

Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your comment (by adding ~~~~ at the end) to assist the bot that archives this page. Please add a new thread to the bottom of the page if you wish to leave me a new message. If you're following up on a previous message, keep your comment in that same place: If you leave me a message here, I will reply here and {{Mention}} you here or leave a {{Talkback}} template on your talk page, unless you indicate that you are watching my page or no talkback message is necessary. If you are responding to a message I left on your talk page, please reply there so the discussion stays in one place. Please {{Mention}} me in the message there or leave a {{Talkback}} template here so I know about the message, unless I indicate that no talkback is necessary in my message. If you are commenting here on a message or warning I left there, don't be surprised if I move the discussion back to your talk page. This page is set for automatic archiving every year. I will remove talkback messages as acknowledgment that I have read the related reply, and I reserve the right to summarily remove any uncivil comments. Thank you, and happy editing!

You could start to discuss down. Thanks 😊 -Arorae (talk) 23:11, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ministry of Environment, Lands and Agricultural Development, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DocumentError (talk) 02:11, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ministry of Information, Communications, Transport and Tourism Development, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

LefcentrerightDiscuss 08:42, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Kiribati has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 12:43, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have also removed some material from Draft:Constitution of Kiribati that is a match for text in this pdf. CC by NC-ND is not a compatible license.— Diannaa (talk) 13:45, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Constitution of Kiribati, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DocumentError (talk) 03:27, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I noticed you copied and pasted a couple of sentences from this article into 1978 Gilbertese parliamentary election, which I have removed as a copyright violation. You've been editing for 16 years – surely you know you're not allowed to copy and paste from other sources? I notice you received a warning earlier this week about doing the same thing from Diannaa. Do you do this regularly? Does someone need to go through over a decade of your contributions to check for more of this? Number 57 09:46, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In fact you received two warnings about copyright violations in July as well.[1][2] Number 57 09:49, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, back. There was no indication of Copyright on this paper, and I rewrote the text. You can go through over 16 years and 10,000 contributions to check it out… --Arorae (talk) 09:50, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The second one was a CC by NC-ND, not a compatible license. I did not know.--Arorae (talk) 09:51, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The extent of your "rewriting" was to change "ten" to "10" and "per cent" to "%". Other than that the text is identical.

The source states:

"three members were returned unopposed, while ten others secured the 50 per cent of valid votes required for election. The remaining 22 seats were filled in a run-off election among leading candidates on 6 February. Then, on 17 March, there was a national election for Chief Minister among four candidates chosen by and from these newly-elected members of the House of Assembly."

The text you added states:

"three members were returned unopposed, while 10 others secured the 50% of valid votes required for election. The remaining 22 seats were filled in a run-off election among leading candidates on 6 February. Then, on 17 March, there was a national election for Chief Minister among four candidates, chosen by and from these newly-elected members."

The fact that the pdf of the paper had no indication of copyright is completely irrelevant. It was published in Political Science – do you really think that has no copyright? Diannaa, do you think this is potentially a WP:CIR issue? Number 57 09:57, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Many people don't understand this point: Under current copyright law, literary works are subject to copyright whether they are tagged as such or not. No registration is required, and no copyright notice is required. This applies all over the world under international treaties. So Arorae, please always assume that all material you find online is copyright whether it's marked as such or not.— Diannaa (talk) 11:01, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour. Tout simplement, Wikipédia requiert des sources que les lecteurs puissent consulter pour vérifier que les informations sont exactes. Nous sommes tenus de suivre ces règles : Wikipedia:Verifiability. Ainsi, par exemple, les sources indiquaient initialement que Teatao Teannaki est mort au Parlement ; c'est évidemment pour cela que ça figurait dans l'article. Je vois que RNZ indique maintenant simplement qu'il est mort durant une discussion, sans préciser le lieu. Le Guam Daily Post, reprenant une brève de PacNews, indique qu'il est mort à Betio, ce que je vais donc indiquer dans l'article. Merci de l'avoir relevé. Aridd (talk) 10:43, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour. Je n’ai pas la même interprétation des faits. Dès sa mort, les sources que je lis (certes sur Facebook, mais c’est Radio Kiribati donc du sérieux), indiquent qu’il est mort dans une maneaba à Betio, ce qui a été interprété par certains comme la Maneaba ni Maungatabu, ce qui fait mort au champ d’honneur en tant que Speaker de la chambre. Il s’agissait plus humblement d’un meeting (appelé Botaki en gilbertin) dans une maison commune des originaires d’Abaiang et non du Parlement. Merci d’avoir rectifié tout de même.--Arorae (talk) 11:02, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gilbertese language, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kuria. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:20, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Japanese occupation of the Solomon Islands, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page South Pacific.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:44, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ao I taku bwa tii ngai ae I bati n taetae n Kiribati i aon Wikipedia. Ngaia bon iai! Mauri mai Fiji. :-) KRtau16 (talk) 11:04, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ko batin rabwa, Mauri mai Buranti.--Arorae (talk) 11:36, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. You recently moved the article Tokyo Tatsumi International Swimming Center to Tokyo Tatsumi International Swimming Centre with the claim that's what the sources say. Japanese English is generally American English in spelling, not British English. Additionally all the sources have it spelt Center including the official website (see here for official site and what they name themselves.) As a result I'll be moving it all back to line up with the sources and what they call themselves. Canterbury Tail talk 13:35, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Canterbury Tail:. Are you sure? Here is the Official spelling: Centre…--Arorae (talk) 13:40, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The actual official page for the facility has center, as do all the sources on the article. If in doubt we should go by what a location calls itself, not what others call it. I admit that site does show a discrepancy, but it's not the site of the location itself. Even the embedded map uses center. Canterbury Tail talk 13:43, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Canterbury Tail:. It is the official site of the Games. Please do not disturb me anymore here.--Arorae (talk) 13:46, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pierre Guichet, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DocumentError (talk) 02:06, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Reederei Nord, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. We can't establish WP:NOTABILITY from a single, in-house link - please provide evidence of coverage in newspapers etc. Elmidae (talk · contribs) 20:26, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Toshiya Saito, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 16:57, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Arorae, thank you so much for setting up the list of members in Maungatabu. I would love to fill in the blank cells for the results table, but I've found various sources stating different numbers of registered voters and I haven't found any sources for results of the second round of the elections. So far, the only sources for the results of the first round are the Facebook accounts of Radio Kiribati and the Kiribati Ministry of Justice. The Kiribati Ministry of Justice states their registered voters in this source too (with the exception of Tabuaeran), but these numbers differ from Radio Kiribati numbers of registered voters from March 27th. The numbers you are stating in the results table differ again from both sources. So my questions are: Where did you find them and how can we finish this article? It's real investigative work to get election data from Kiribati :O. With best regards and thank you a lot for your efforts in bringing clarity to this topic. With best regards and stay healthy, --Hanzlan (talk) 18:33, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. You've made a number of unsourced or improperly sourced edits recently, such as [3],[4], and [5]. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:07, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It should be relatively easy for the reader to determine what source material is associated with; they should've have to dig through edit summaries or guess; see this edit as an example of how to reference a previously cited source. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:04, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks !--Arorae (talk) 15:05, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:16, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Arorae. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Fisheries Training Centre".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 22:54, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Arorae. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Aug. Bolten".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:11, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Arorae. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Fisser & v. Doornum".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 06:30, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Amico mio, come facciamo. io le e-mail non le posso leggere --Kasper2006 (talk) 18:33, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Kasper2006:. Per quale ragione ?--Arorae (talk) 20:29, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Perché ovviamente 15 anni fa mi sono registrato con una mail che non è più attiva --Kasper2006 (talk) 20:55, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I noticed you made a comment on the requested move I made on the Swadhinata Stambha talk page. I understand your rationale. But it is going to be incredibly difficult for English speakers to find this article as it has a Bengali name. English speakers like myself who know Bengali will have no problems but I am not in the majority and I think it would be a lot easier for English speaker to find this article with the name I proposed.

The National Martyrs’ Memorial is called such because English speakers will struggle to find the article under the Bengali name, similar to how English speakers will struggle to find the article I proposed a name change for.

Kind regards, AMomen88 AMomen88 (talk) 23:03, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ferhat Arıcan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Konak.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Felipe dos Santos (sprinter), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 21:37, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Stadio Luigi Ridolfi, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster _talk 17:11, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Come hai fatto l'inversione di redirect io non ci ero riuscito? Hai usato la pagina [Deletion log Deletion log]? Ma la può usare chiunque? --Kasper2006 (talk) 04:33, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2021 European Athletics Team Championships

Hello, in these competitions, only team titles and points are important? The first three people of each event will not be awarded medals? --Hao Xia Xia (talk) 16:45, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2021_European_Athletics_Team_Championships_Super_League#Medal_table — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hao Xia Xia (talk • contribs) 16:48, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Se vuoi la pagina dello stadio della Quercia, falla. Non c'è nemmeno nella wiki italiana. La regola vorrebbe che se una pagina si pensa che nessuno la farà mai (e non ci sono interwiki), non serve il link. --Kasper2006 (talk) 11:32, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

carissimo: scusa ma il Stadio Quercia sarà una voce. Togliendo il link (che avevo messo), hai fatto anche tu un revert. --Arorae (talk) 12:37, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Arorae! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Italy at the 2020 Summer Olympics that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. David Biddulph (talk) 07:47, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@David Biddulph: thanks, but I know that, already. which one edit? I have made so many minor edits, not the subject of dispute (very superficial). For example, counting the exact number of athletes participating is quite uneasy (it changes at every moment and will change until 1st July).--Arorae (talk) 07:54, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Arorae: Help:Minor edit says "A good rule of thumb is that edits consisting solely of spelling corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of the content should be flagged as minor edits." Pretending to quote the number of athletes participating is indeed pointless at this stage, but changes are not minor. Among your changes this morning, the changes to table formatting are minor, but the rest not. Again, from Help:Minor edit, "... if you are in doubt about whether an edit is minor or not, it is always safer not to mark it as minor." - David Biddulph (talk) 08:27, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ping me when you leave a message here is useless (!!!), as it is quite useless to insist. Do I let you messages for that? If you would like to improve my edits on WP, since 2004, it is a bit too late. There are so many rules existing (I know some and most I do not) and even if I always try to do my best, I have no time to analyze every "minor edits" I did. Especially on not controversial edits.--Arorae (talk) 08:35, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your kind words. I found the Latasai story remarkable whilst I was researching it, what an incredible young man, I really wish him the best, please send on my regards.

I suspect some interpret notability as being selected for the Olympics and some interpret it as the the physical act of competing. I’m sure the second is right “to the letter of the law” but it ignores all the people who (quite rightly in my opinion) turn to Wikipedia to see who is competing and maybe want to read who is representing their countries, etc, in advance of the event taking place, and as squads are announced. The more fastidious members of the admin crew of course may will point out they may not still compete, which I would suggest is the time to sandbox, but of course each to their own, but the internet isn’t yet full as far as I know. Some people seek control in aspects of their lives to help with other aspects of life they’re struggling with, and I’m not going to judge. I’m sure the Bismark Boateng page will reappear once his foot steps onto that Olympic track later on in the month and I shall enjoy seeing him compete, as I will with Latasai! It’s going to be a fabulous month fingers crossed! Hildreth gazzard (talk) 06:27, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @Hildreth gazzard: Boateng page was created again (by @Sportsfan 1234:), so no more red link and before he steps onto National Stadium track.--Arorae (talk) 01:18, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As a keen Wikipedian I thought you might be interested in this article. Kiribati got a mention :) https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2021/aug/01/olympics-wikipedia-guy-fraser-tokyo Hildreth gazzard (talk) 14:04, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Japan at the 2020 Summer Olympics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yuki Koike.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:53, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I hope that you realised that I deleted junk. And thanks that you updated the file, regards. --56frosch (talk) 14:51, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020 Summer Olympics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Refugee Olympic Team.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ariake West Canal. Thanks! AntanO 05:57, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sei italiano quindi ti rispondo in italiano, anche perchè il mio inglese è modesto. La mappa non ha fonti, si c'è stata una parentesi punica in Corsica ma siamo sicuri che il dominio coinvolse l'intera isola? io non sono un esperto della presenza punica in Corsica, potresti indicarmi qualche fonte attendibile che dica ciò? E comunque nella mappa manca la presenza punica nell'oristanese e nel Campidano, quindi non è corretta anche per quello. Ciao Xóil (talk) 12:08, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Se non fornisci fonti (da dove è stata presa questa mappa) tempo qualche giorno e la rimuovo. A parte il fatto che non ci fa nulla nella pagina vista che c'è già un' immagine storica per ogni paragrafo storico. La Sardegna è stata anche parte dell impero romano vandalo bizantino ecc. Dovremmo mettere una mappa per tutti? Non credo Xóil (talk) 12:38, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Sportsfan 1234. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Template:Nations at the 2020 Summer Olympics have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 00:59, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Sportsfan 1234:. Not one of my contributions on this template have been undone or was Sandbox type: [6], but yours?--Arorae (talk) 01:05, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

perhaps you should also know that Guinea has since reinstated its team… --Arorae (talk) 01:08, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

While this could be notable, it isn't inherently so (per WP:GEOFEAT), and therefore must establish WP:GNG notability. The sources currently cited appear to be insufficient for that.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ariake West Canal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ariake West Canal, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:41, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Arorae! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:41, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Athletes (track and field) at the 2020 Summer Olympics has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 03:10, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Arorae, I am Jejsiguoa. As you are a member of Wikiproject:olympics, I want to ask you a question.

Suppose, an athlete, in 100m heats, has ranked 2nd in heat 3. And, after the all heats finished, his/her rank became 4th. For Olympics, there are individual articles on the performances of each country. Now, my question, which result, (2nd in heat 3 or 4th in overall heats) should be provided to the article of the nation's performance? What is the general convention? 2and or 4th? Jejsiguoa (talk) 15:35, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Jejsiguoa: in athletics, there is no overall ranking of the heats and preliminary rounds (also quarters or semifinals) because the weather and events' conditions are always different. so if you are 2nd in your heat, you are not ranked 4th or 5th for all the heats (not officially).--Arorae (talk) 16:18, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No no. I didn't mean that. Suppose,there is a heat of 100m Men's at any Olympics. The results of the heats are:

Heat 1

1. A : 10.04 2. B : 10.10 3. C : 10.12

Heat 2

1. D: 10.01 2. E: 10.06 3. F: 10.07

Heat 3

1. G: 9.96 2. H: 10.05 3. I: 10.09

Heat 4

1. J: 10.00 2. K: 10.02 3. L: 10.03

(Athletes are represented by A, B, C, D,...)

Overall Heats Results

1. G: 9.96 2. J: 10.00 3. D: 10.01 4. K: 10.02 5. L: 10.03 6. A: 10.04 7. H: 10.05 8. E: 10.06 9. F: 10.07 10. I: 10.09 11. B: 10.10 12. C: 10.12

Now, let's consider Athlete L. In his heat (fourth heat), he has ranked 3rd. But at the overall ranking, he is 5th by timing. Now, every country has their own wikipedia pages on Olympic performances. Like, India at the 2020 Summer Olympics, like Kiribati at the 2020 Summer Olympics etc. If Athlete L is from Kiribati, then his performance would be written in it. In the table of Athletics, what would be his heat ranking? 3rd (specific heat ranking), or 5th (overall heat ranking)? What is the general rule?

I think you have understood the question. Please reply as soon as possible. Jejsiguoa (talk) 14:24, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Arorae, regarding your revert on Gilbert and Ellice Islands] and successor states. Looking over the GEI and Swains Island articles, it looks like control was disputed some at the time, but the GEI article states "In 1925, Great Britain asked New Zealand to accept responsibility for the administration of the Union Islands (Tokelau) and invited the United States to annex Swains Island." Do you know if that was just a formality or diplomatic game? It was based on that line that I added American Samoa as a successor state since it was at that point that the U.S. incorporated Swains into American Samoa. Thanks. —Carter (Tcr25) (talk) 19:27, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Tcr25: Union Islands were not the main issue of the Colony. They were added to GEIC and officially withdrawn in 1925 (de jure) but de facto only in 1948. In fact nobody cares about it even NZ (they were never control of NZ officials before the end of WWII. Imho, American Samoa cannot be considered as a successor of the British Colony (seems that they annexed part of it). Tarawa Treaty (1979) between US and Kiribati marks the end of all territorial disputes between those countries.--Arorae (talk) 11:54, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ariake West Canal, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 17:10, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020 European Rowing U23 Championships, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Kearney.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I was actually wrong regarding the moment when the mayor becomes incumbent – it is actually right after the electoral council declares the winner. However for the case of Naples the vote counting has not finished yet and therefore the electoral council has not officially concluded the election. So let's wait for that to change the mayor in the Naples article. --Ritchie92 (talk) 09:11, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Arorae. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Stadio Luigi Ridolfi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:02, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Arorae, i see tht you moved Eko Yuli Irawan article to Eko Irawan. Fyi, he is well known with Eko Yuli Irawan, and most of Indonesian articles cited as Eko Yuli Irawan, just like in IWF website and Olympics.com. So, please don't just rely on Olympedia as references, especially for Indonesian athletes. Because, there were some mistakes in Olympedia for Indonesian athlete name, just like Windy Cantika Aisah should not be shortened as Windy Aisah, Kevin Sanjaya Sukamuljo not Kevin Sukamuljo, Anthony Sinisuka Ginting not Anthony Ginting, and etc. Thank you! Stvbastian (talk) 05:11, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Arorae,

Thank you for creating Southern United F.C. (Solomon Islands).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Southern United are not mentioned in the reference

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Joseywales1961}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

JW 1961 ^Talk 09:26, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Joseywales1961:: Done! --Arorae (talk) 09:35, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, that was quick! JW 1961 ^Talk 09:56, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Arorae, you thanked me for one of my recent edits, so here is a heart-felt...  YOU'RE WELCOME! It's a pleasure, and I hope you have a lot of fun while you edit this inspiring encyclopedia phenomenon! Best wishes, VukkyTalkGuestbook

17:02, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Slywriter was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Existence is not notability

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Stadio Luigi Ridolfi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Stadio Luigi Ridolfi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Slywriter (talk) 16:39, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

== 2022 Italian Athletics Championships moved to draftspace ==

An article you recently created, 2022 Italian Athletics Championships, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Whiteguru (talk) 05:55, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mitico! :D Ti voglio bene, lo sai <3 :* Sono anni che pratichi questa storia degli spostamenti bold, spesso sono sono costretto a rivolgermi all'help desk per risistemare. Ma oggi ad esempio stride che mi accorci Pettorossi, mentre anni fa quando feci Juan Bencosme me lo spostasti mettendomi tutti e 300 i nomi :D --Kasper2006 (talk) 06:21, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Kasper2006:, non capisco il tuo commento (cosa significa bold?) perché gli spostamenti li faccio solo secondo le fonti le più usuali (i giornali sportivi italiani). Diego Pettorossi nessun media italiano, come anche qui lo chiama con i due nomi, neanche il dotto Bragagna, comme nessuno chiama Lamont Marcell, Jacobs. Il nome deve essere il più frequente possibile. Mi dispiace che ti rincresca Bencosme de León ma si chiama proprio così come si evince dal pettorale, non è una mia lubia.--Arorae (talk) 10:01, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. valereee (talk) 20:08, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding this blind revert, your change made the article inconsistent, as the electoral system section states "Of the 46 members of the House of Assembly..." and goes on to list the 46 members. I made it clear in my edit summary that this was an issue, yet you reinstated the inconsistency. Even though you subsequently amended the start of that section to 45, it still goes on to describe 46 members; 44 elected, one representing Rabi Island and the Speaker.

If you had bothered to examine my edit properly, you'd have also noticed I added some category sorting, which you removed without thinking/realising.

If 46 is incorrect, then fix the entire article, not just one or two parts of it. Number 57 19:37, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Very upseting message: I am not blind yet and you are wrong as the correct number is 45 not 46, as the Speaker is not a MP and as the Attorney General is no more an ex officio member since 2016. So I have examined your edit properly (and your category sorting was not an essential thing, by the way, I have fixed it since). Be more wikilove and try to figure out that my edits could be perfectly correct, not only yours.--Arorae (talk) 20:48, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

When making BLP changes YOU MUST source your edits in the article. If you are unsure how to do so, please read up on the rules. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 16:49, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, can you help me understand why you removed the redir from Kiribati Protestant Church to Kiribati Uniting Church? If they essentially are the same organisation, then shouldn't they be dealt with in a single article? I came across the KPC one at new page patrol, and was going to propose merging it with the KUC article, but wanted to check with you first for your reasons. Thanks, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:16, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your page: thanks for your question. Arorae (talk) 15:43, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Kiribati Uniting Church into Kiribati Protestant Church. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 13:29, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for this info @Diannaa: but the common history of KPC and KUC is exactly identical and the same from 1860 to 2014—2015, when KPC became KUC before reconstitution of KPC the same year. I understand the copying issue but I am not familiar with this practice.--Arorae (talk) 13:35, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's okay to copy text from one Wikipedia article to another, but when you do so, you need to say in your edit summary where you got the content. That way the authors get credited, and it is required under the terms of our license. — Diannaa (talk) 13:43, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I also add it in both the Talk Pages (that were identical).--Arorae (talk) 13:45, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A note on the talk page is optional; the edit summary is mandatory. — Diannaa (talk) 13:51, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour. Merci (vraiment) pour votre gentil message. L'ordre de déportation serait effectivement intéressant à voir. Même vu d'ici et sans attache personnelle aux Kiribati, la situation semble inquiétante, alors je ne peux qu'imaginer ce qu'il en est pour vous et pour vos amis affectés, et compatir. Bon courage à vos proches ! Aridd (talk) 09:12, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Aridd:: un très jeune ami Gilbertin qui habite aux Fidji a écrit ça 2022 Kiribati constitutional crisis.--Arorae (talk) 13:37, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Ioteba Tamuera Uriam

added a link pointing to Tamana

Jeremiah Azu

added a link pointing to Rumney

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Arorae. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Stadio Luigi Ridolfi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:37, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Arorae. Thank you for creating David Lambourne. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 01:52, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@SunDawn:: you’re welcome, in Gilbertese they will say « te raoi », the peace.Arorae (talk) 11:58, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Catholic seminaries in Fiji indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:42, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Catholic seminaries in Oceania indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:42, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Latimer House Principles, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources - the sources presented are primary, not secondary sources and are unsuitable to sustain an article. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 10:11, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Raphael Bouju, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raphael Bouju until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, 2024 World Athletics Indoor Championships, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 15:02, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qwerfjkl was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2024 World Athletics Indoor Championships and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qwerfjkltalk 20:56, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:2024 World Athletics Indoor Championships indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:15, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Arorae. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Latimer House Principles, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:00, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I've seen in your user page that you speak Gilbertese. I would like to ask you whether you could possible help out developing the Wikipedia in that language. --Caro de Segeda (talk) 07:24, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear User, my poor knowledge of the Gilbertese language is not enough to help out developing the Wikipedia in that language. But thanks for asking.

Ko rabwa. Arorae (talk) 00:20, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Arorae. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Latimer House Principles".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:34, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear, Please do not touch world, area and national records lists, ok? Your edits are extremely low quality, useless in fact. You deleted current, ratified record, left wrong venue and did not give reference. Do not delete old records until new records have been ratified. Track1News (talk) 18:02, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Are you the police of Wikipedia athletics? I don’t think so. Arorae (talk) 18:49, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Uziel Muñoz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Drake Stadium.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:28, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Athletics in Italy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eugene.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Arorae!

• The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
• We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
• Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
• Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
• If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

Sent by Zippybonzo using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:45, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2025 World Athletics Championships has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 06:38, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Arorae, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username North8000, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Denys Zavhorodniy, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Denys Zavhorodniy.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 12:35, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Events at the 2025 World Athletics Championships indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 14:10, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:2025 World Athletics Championships indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:32, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Sha Mahmood Noor Zahi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fails gng

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 05:43, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Arorae. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Latimer House Principles".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:16, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Arorae. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2023 World Athletics Championships – Men's 4 × 100 metres relay, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:05, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour. Est-ce que vous êtes actuellement à Arorae même, ou bien y avez de la famille ? Je vous pose la question parce que je suis surpris que l'ancienne vice-présidente Teima Onorio n'ait obtenu que dix-sept suffrages au second tour des législatives hier dans cette circonscription. Sauriez-vous si, par exemple, elle a appelé ses électeurs à voter pour un de ses adversaires au second tour, et n'a pas eu le temps de faire retirer son propre nom de la liste des candidats... ? J'imagine qu'au minimum elle avait renoncé à faire campagne pour le second tour ? Aridd (talk) 17:22, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]