This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.
Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!
Hi Sportsfan 1234! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Buzz cut several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.
All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Buzz cut, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Belbury (talk) 09:00, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240906090000","author":"Belbury","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Belbury-20240906090000-September_2024","replies":["c-Belbury-20241006140300-Belbury-20240906090000"]}}-->
Still waiting for a response at Talk:Buzz cut for why you think the David Perron photo is better for the article than one of a Navy haircut. Let me know if you have a view on it. Belbury (talk) 14:03, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20241006140300","author":"Belbury","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Belbury-20241006140300-Belbury-20240906090000","replies":[]}}-->
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20241119002800","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20241119002800-ArbCom_2024_Elections_voter_message","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Bkell-20241221050200","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Please_don't_add_unnecessary_bold_in_the_first_sentence-20241221050200","replies":["c-Bkell-20241221050200-Please_don't_add_unnecessary_bold_in_the_first_sentence"],"text":"Please don't add unnecessary bold in the first sentence","linkableTitle":"Please don't add unnecessary bold in the first sentence"}-->
Please don't add unnecessary bold in the first sentence
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Bkell-20241221050200","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Please_don't_add_unnecessary_bold_in_the_first_sentence-20241221050200","replies":["c-Bkell-20241221050200-Please_don't_add_unnecessary_bold_in_the_first_sentence"],"text":"Please don't add unnecessary bold in the first sentence","linkableTitle":"Please don't add unnecessary bold in the first sentence"}-->
Hi Sportsfan 1234, thanks for creating so many articles about sporting events! However, I notice that you often add unnecessary bold in the first sentence that goes against the Manual of Style. For example, the first sentence of Kuwait at the 2025 Asian Winter Games was created like this:
The bold here is unnecessary and should be avoided. Please see the following sections of the Manual of Style:
MOS:TITLEABSENTBOLD: "In general, if the article's title (or a significant alternative title) is absent from the first sentence, do not apply the bold style to related text that does appear."
MOS:BOLDLINKAVOID: "Links should not be placed in the boldface reiteration of the title in the first sentence of a lead."
Also WP:SBE: for a merely descriptive article title, it's usually inappropriate to bold anything at all.
A couple of other Manual of Style points apply here too:
MOS:GEOLINK: "For a geographical location expressed as a sequence of two or more territorial units, link only the first unit." So "China" should not be linked here. (See also MOS:OVERLINK.)
MOS:GEOCOMMA: "In geographical references that include multiple levels of subordinate divisions (e.g., city, state/province, country), a comma separates each element and follows the last element unless followed by terminal punctuation or a closing parenthesis." So there should be a comma after "China" here.
Therefore, the first sentence I quoted above should look like this:
I fix these things as I come across them, but I think you create articles faster than I can fix them, so I'd really appreciate your help in maintaining consistent style across Wikipedia! Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you! —Bkell (talk) 05:02, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20241221050200","author":"Bkell","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Bkell-20241221050200-Please_don't_add_unnecessary_bold_in_the_first_sentence","replies":[]}}-->
