This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "Finsler manifold" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (May 2017) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

In mathematics, particularly differential geometry, a Finsler manifold is a differentiable manifold M where a (possibly asymmetric) Minkowski norm F(x, −) is provided on each tangent space T_xM, that enables one to define the length of any smooth curve γ : [a, b] → M as

${\displaystyle L(\gamma )=\int _{a}^{b}F\left(\gamma (t),{\dot {\gamma }}(t)\right)\,\mathrm {d} t.}$

Finsler manifolds are more general than Riemannian manifolds since the tangent norms need not be induced by inner products.

Every Finsler manifold becomes an intrinsic quasimetric space when the distance between two points is defined as the infimum length of the curves that join them.

Élie Cartan (1933) named Finsler manifolds after Paul Finsler, who studied this geometry in his dissertation (Finsler 1918).

A Finsler manifold is a differentiable manifold M together with a Finsler metric, which is a continuous nonnegative function F: TM → [0, +∞) defined on the tangent bundle so that for each point x of M,

• F(v + w) ≤ F(v) + F(w) for every two vectors v,w tangent to M at x (subadditivity).
• F(λv) = λF(v) for all λ ≥ 0 (but not necessarily for λ < 0) (positive homogeneity).
• F(v) > 0 unless v = 0 (positive definiteness).

In other words, F(x, −) is an asymmetric norm on each tangent space T_xM. The Finsler metric F is also required to be smooth, more precisely:

• F is smooth on the complement of the zero section of TM.

The subadditivity axiom may then be replaced by the following strong convexity condition:

• For each tangent vector v ≠ 0, the Hessian matrix of F² at v is positive definite.

Here the Hessian of F² at v is the symmetric bilinear form

${\displaystyle \mathbf {g} _{v}(X,Y):={\frac {1}{2}}\left.{\frac {\partial ^{2}}{\partial s\partial t}}\left[F(v+sX+tY)^{2}\right]\right|_{s=t=0},}$

also known as the fundamental tensor of F at v. Strong convexity of F implies the subadditivity with a strict inequality if u⁄F(u) ≠ v⁄F(v). If F is strongly convex, then it is a Minkowski norm on each tangent space.

A Finsler metric is reversible if, in addition,

• F(−v) = F(v) for all tangent vectors v.

A reversible Finsler metric defines a norm (in the usual sense) on each tangent space.

• Smooth submanifolds (including open subsets) of a normed vector space of finite dimension are Finsler manifolds if the norm of the vector space is smooth outside the origin.
• Riemannian manifolds (but not pseudo-Riemannian manifolds) are special cases of Finsler manifolds.

Let ${\displaystyle (M,a)}$ be a Riemannian manifold and b a differential one-form on M with

${\displaystyle \|b\|_{a}:={\sqrt {a^{ij}b_{i}b_{j}}}<1,}$

where ${\displaystyle \left(a^{ij}\right)}$ is the inverse matrix of ${\displaystyle (a_{ij})}$ and the Einstein notation is used. Then

${\displaystyle F(x,v):={\sqrt {a_{ij}(x)v^{i}v^{j}}}+b_{i}(x)v^{i}}$

defines a Randers metric on M and ${\displaystyle (M,F)}$ is a Randers manifold, a special case of a non-reversible Finsler manifold.^[1]

Let (M, d) be a quasimetric so that M is also a differentiable manifold and d is compatible with the differential structure of M in the following sense:

• Around any point z on M there exists a smooth chart (U, φ) of M and a constant C ≥ 1 such that for every x, y ∈ U

  ${\displaystyle {\frac {1}{C}}\|\phi (y)-\phi (x)\|\leq d(x,y)\leq C\|\phi (y)-\phi (x)\|.}$

• The function d: M × M → [0, ∞] is smooth in some punctured neighborhood of the diagonal.

Then one can define a Finsler function F: TM →[0, ∞] by

${\displaystyle F(x,v):=\lim _{t\to 0+}{\frac {d(\gamma (0),\gamma (t))}{t}},}$

where γ is any curve in M with γ(0) = x and γ'(0) = v. The Finsler function F obtained in this way restricts to an asymmetric (typically non-Minkowski) norm on each tangent space of M. The induced intrinsic metric d_L: M × M → [0, ∞] of the original quasimetric can be recovered from

${\displaystyle d_{L}(x,y):=\inf \left\{\ \left.\int _{0}^{1}F\left(\gamma (t),{\dot {\gamma }}(t)\right)\,dt\ \right|\ \gamma \in C^{1}([0,1],M)\ ,\ \gamma (0)=x\ ,\ \gamma (1)=y\ \right\},}$

and in fact any Finsler function F: TM → [0, ∞) defines an intrinsic quasimetric d_L on M by this formula.

Due to the homogeneity of F the length

${\displaystyle L[\gamma ]:=\int _{a}^{b}F\left(\gamma (t),{\dot {\gamma }}(t)\right)\,dt}$

of a differentiable curve γ: [a, b] → M in M is invariant under positively oriented reparametrizations. A constant speed curve γ is a geodesic of a Finsler manifold if its short enough segments γ|_[c,d] are length-minimizing in M from γ(c) to γ(d). Equivalently, γ is a geodesic if it is stationary for the energy functional

${\displaystyle E[\gamma ]:={\frac {1}{2}}\int _{a}^{b}F^{2}\left(\gamma (t),{\dot {\gamma }}(t)\right)\,dt}$

in the sense that its functional derivative vanishes among differentiable curves γ: [a, b] → M with fixed endpoints γ(a) = x and γ(b) = y.

The Euler–Lagrange equation for the energy functional E[γ] reads in the local coordinates (x¹, ..., xⁿ, v¹, ..., vⁿ) of TM as

${\displaystyle g_{ik}{\Big (}\gamma (t),{\dot {\gamma }}(t){\Big )}{\ddot {\gamma }}^{i}(t)+\left({\frac {\partial g_{ik}}{\partial x^{j}}}{\Big (}\gamma (t),{\dot {\gamma }}(t){\Big )}-{\frac {1}{2}}{\frac {\partial g_{ij}}{\partial x^{k}}}{\Big (}\gamma (t),{\dot {\gamma }}(t){\Big )}\right){\dot {\gamma }}^{i}(t){\dot {\gamma }}^{j}(t)=0,}$

where k = 1, ..., n and g_ij is the coordinate representation of the fundamental tensor, defined as

${\displaystyle g_{ij}(x,v):=g_{v}\left(\left.{\frac {\partial }{\partial x^{i}}}\right|_{x},\left.{\frac {\partial }{\partial x^{j}}}\right|_{x}\right).}$

Assuming the strong convexity of F²(x, v) with respect to v ∈ T_xM, the matrix g_ij(x, v) is invertible and its inverse is denoted by g^ij(x, v). Then γ: [a, b] → M is a geodesic of (M, F) if and only if its tangent curve γ': [a, b] → TM∖{0} is an integral curve of the smooth vector field H on TM∖{0} locally defined by

${\displaystyle \left.H\right|_{(x,v)}:=\left.v^{i}{\frac {\partial }{\partial x^{i}}}\right|_{(x,v)}\!\!-\left.2G^{i}(x,v){\frac {\partial }{\partial v^{i}}}\right|_{(x,v)},}$

where the local spray coefficients Gⁱ are given by

${\displaystyle G^{i}(x,v):={\frac {1}{4}}g^{ij}(x,v)\left(2{\frac {\partial g_{jk}}{\partial x^{\ell }}}(x,v)-{\frac {\partial g_{k\ell }}{\partial x^{j}}}(x,v)\right)v^{k}v^{\ell }.}$

The vector field H on TM∖{0} satisfies JH = V and [V, H] = H, where J and V are the canonical endomorphism and the canonical vector field on TM∖{0}. Hence, by definition, H is a spray on M. The spray H defines a nonlinear connection on the fibre bundle TM∖{0} → M through the vertical projection

${\displaystyle v:T(\mathrm {T} M\setminus \{0\})\to T(\mathrm {T} M\setminus \{0\});\quad v:={\frac {1}{2}}{\big (}I+{\mathcal {L}}_{H}J{\big )}.}$

In analogy with the Riemannian case, there is a version

${\displaystyle D_{\dot {\gamma }}D_{\dot {\gamma }}X(t)+R_{\dot {\gamma }}\left({\dot {\gamma }}(t),X(t)\right)=0}$

of the Jacobi equation for a general spray structure (M, H) in terms of the Ehresmann curvature and nonlinear covariant derivative.

By Hopf–Rinow theorem there always exist length minimizing curves (at least in small enough neighborhoods) on (M, F). Length minimizing curves can always be positively reparametrized to be geodesics, and any geodesic must satisfy the Euler–Lagrange equation for E[γ]. Assuming the strong convexity of F² there exists a unique maximal geodesic γ with γ(0) = x and γ'(0) = v for any (x, v) ∈ TM∖{0} by the uniqueness of integral curves.

If F² is strongly convex, geodesics γ: [0, b] → M are length-minimizing among nearby curves until the first point γ(s) conjugate to γ(0) along γ, and for t > s there always exist shorter curves from γ(0) to γ(t) near γ, as in the Riemannian case.

• Banach manifold – Manifold modeled on Banach spaces
• Fréchet manifold – topological space modeled on a Fréchet space in much the same way as a manifold is modeled on a Euclidean spacePages displaying wikidata descriptions as a fallback
• Global analysis – which uses Hilbert manifolds and other kinds of infinite-dimensional manifolds
• Hilbert manifold – Manifold modelled on Hilbert spaces

• Antonelli, Peter L., ed. (2003), Handbook of Finsler geometry. Vol. 1, 2, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, ISBN 978-1-4020-1557-1, MR 2067663
• Bao, David; Chern, Shiing-Shen; Shen, Zhongmin (2000). An introduction to Riemann–Finsler geometry. Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Vol. 200. New York: Springer-Verlag. doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-1268-3. ISBN 0-387-98948-X. MR 1747675.
• Cartan, Élie (1933), "Sur les espaces de Finsler", C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, 196: 582–586, Zbl 0006.22501
• Chern, Shiing-Shen (1996), "Finsler geometry is just Riemannian geometry without the quadratic restriction" (PDF), Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 43 (9): 959–63, MR 1400859
• Finsler, Paul (1918), Über Kurven und Flächen in allgemeinen Räumen, Dissertation, Göttingen, JFM 46.1131.02 (Reprinted by Birkhäuser (1951))
• Rund, Hanno (1959). The differential geometry of Finsler spaces. Die Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften. Vol. 101. Berlin–Göttingen–Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-51610-8. ISBN 978-3-642-51612-2. MR 0105726.
• Shen, Zhongmin (2001). Lectures on Finsler geometry. Singapore: World Scientific. doi:10.1142/4619. ISBN 981-02-4531-9. MR 1845637.

• "Finsler space, generalized", Encyclopedia of Mathematics, EMS Press, 2001 [1994]
• The (New) Finsler Newsletter