Evolutionary medicine or Darwinian medicine is the application of modern evolutionary theory to understanding health and disease. Modern biomedical research and practice have focused on the molecular and physiological mechanisms underlying health and disease, while evolutionary medicine focuses on the question of why evolution has shaped these mechanisms in ways that may leave us susceptible to disease. The evolutionary approach has driven important advances in the understanding of cancer,[1]autoimmune disease,[2] and anatomy.[3] Medical schools have been slower to integrate evolutionary approaches because of limitations on what can be added to existing medical curricula.[4] The International Society for Evolution, Medicine and Public Health coordinates efforts to develop the field. It owns the Oxford University Press journal Evolution, Medicine and Public Health and The Evolution and Medicine Review.
Core principles
Utilizing the Delphi method, 56 experts from a variety of disciplines, including anthropology, medicine, nursing, and biology agreed upon 14 core principles intrinsic to the education and practice of evolutionary medicine.[5] These 14 principles can be further grouped into five general categories: question framing, evolution I and II (with II involving a higher level of complexity), evolutionary trade-offs, reasons for vulnerability, and culture. Additional information regarding these principles may be found in the table below.
Both proximate (mechanistic) and ultimate (evolutionary) explanations are needed to provide a full biological understanding of traits, including those that increase vulnerability to disease.
Evolutionary processes (evolution I)
All evolutionary processes, including natural selection, genetic drift, mutation, migration and non-random mating, are important for understanding traits and disease.
Reproductive success (evolution I)
Natural selection maximizes reproductive success, sometimes at the expense of health and longevity.
Sexual selection (evolution I)
Sexual selection shapes traits that result in different health risks between sexes.
Constraints (evolution I)
Several constraints inhibit the capacity of natural selection to shape traits that are hypothetically optimal for health.
Life history traits, such as age at first reproduction, reproductive lifespan and rate of senescence, are shaped by evolution, and have implications for health and disease.
Levels of selection (evolution II)
Vulnerabilities to disease can result when selection has opposing effects at different levels (e.g. genetic elements, cells, organisms, kin and other levels).
Coevolution among species can influence health and disease (e.g. evolutionary arms races and mutualistic relationships such as those seen in the microbiome).
Environmental factors can shift developmental trajectories in ways that influence health and the plasticity of these trajectories can be the product of evolved adaptive mechanisms.
Defenses (reasons for vulnerability)
Many signs and symptoms of disease (e.g. fever) are useful defenses, which can be pathological if dysregulated.
Mismatch (reasons for vulnerability)
Disease risks can be altered for organisms living in environments that differ from those in which their ancestors evolved.
Cultural practices (culture)
Cultural practices can influence the evolution of humans and other species (including pathogens), in ways that can affect health and disease (e.g. anti-biotic use, birth practices, diet, etc.).
Human adaptations
Adaptation works within constraints, makes compromises and trade-offs, and occurs in the context of different forms of competition.[6]
Constraints
Adaptations can only occur if they are evolvable. Some adaptations which would prevent ill health are therefore not possible.
DNA cannot be totally prevented from undergoing somatic replication corruption; this has meant that cancer, which is caused by somatic mutations, has not (so far) been eliminated by natural selection.
Humans cannot biosynthesizevitamin C, and so risk scurvy, vitamin C deficiency disease, if dietary intake of the vitamin is insufficient.
Retinal neurons and their axon output have evolved to be inside the layer of retinal pigment cells. This creates a constraint on the evolution of the visual system such that the optic nerve is forced to exit the retina through a point called the optic disc. This, in turn, creates a blind spot. More importantly, it makes vision vulnerable to increased pressure within the eye (glaucoma) since this cups and damages the optic nerve at this point, resulting in impaired vision.
Other constraints occur as the byproduct of adaptive innovations.
Trade-offs and conflicts
One constraint upon selection is that different adaptations can conflict, which requires a compromise between them to ensure an optimal cost-benefit tradeoff.
Humans evolved to live as simple hunter-gatherers in small tribal bands, while contemporary humans have a more complex life.[13][14] This change may make present-day humans susceptible to lifestyle diseases.
Diet
In contrast to the diet of early hunter-gatherers, the modern Western diet often contains high quantities of fat, salt, and simple carbohydrates, such as refined sugars and flours.[15][16][17]
Among different countries, the incidence of colon cancer varies widely, and the extent of exposure to a Western pattern diet may be a factor in cancer incidence.[18]
Of the roughly 150,000 people who die each day across the globe, about two thirds—100,000 per day—die of age-related causes.[19] In industrialized nations, the proportion is much higher, reaching 90%.[19]
Exercise
Many contemporary humans engage in little physical exercise compared to the physically active lifestyles of ancestral hunter-gatherers.[20][21][22][23][24] Prolonged periods of inactivity may have only occurred in early humans following illness or injury, so a modern sedentary lifestyle may continuously cue the body to trigger life preserving metabolic and stress-related responses such as inflammation, and some theorize that this causes chronic diseases.[25]
Contemporary humans in developed countries are mostly free of parasites, particularly intestinal ones. This is largely due to frequent washing of clothing and the body, and improved sanitation. Although such hygiene can be very important when it comes to maintaining good health, it can be problematic for the proper development of the immune system. The hygiene hypothesis is that humans evolved to be dependent on certain microorganisms that help establish the immune system, and modern hygiene practices can prevent necessary exposure to these microorganisms. "Microorganisms and macroorganisms such as helminths from mud, animals, and feces play a critical role in driving immunoregulation" (Rook, 2012[26]). Essential microorganisms play a crucial role in building and training immune functions that fight off and repel some diseases, and protect against excessive inflammation, which has been implicated in several diseases. For instance, recent studies have found evidence supporting inflammation as a contributing factor in Alzheimer's Disease.[27]
As noted in the table below, adaptationist hypotheses regarding the etiology of psychological disorders are often based on analogies with evolutionary perspectives on medicine and physiological dysfunctions (see in particular, Randy Nesse and George C. Williams' book Why We Get Sick).[43]
Evolutionary psychiatrists and psychologists suggest that some mental disorders likely have multiple causes.[63]
Possible Causes of Psychological 'Abnormalities' from an Adaptationist Perspective
Summary based on information in Buss (2011),[64] Gaulin & McBurney (2004),[65] Workman & Reader (2004)[66]
Possible cause
Physiological Dysfunction
Psychological Dysfunction
Functioning adaptation (adaptive defense)
Fever / Vomiting (functional responses to infection or ingestion of toxins)
Mild depression or anxiety (functional responses to mild loss or stress)
By-product of an adaptation(s)
Intestinal gas (byproduct of digestion of fiber)
Sexual fetishes (?) (possible byproduct of normal sexual arousal adaptations that have 'imprinted' on unusual objects or situations)
Adaptations with multiple effects
Gene for malaria resistance, in homozygous form, causes sickle cell anemia
Adaptation(s) for high levels of creativity may also predispose schizophrenia or bi-polar disorder (adaptations with both positive and negative effects, perhaps dependent on alternate developmental trajectories)
Malfunctioning adaptation
Allergies (over-reactive immunological responses)
Autism (possible malfunctioning of theory of mind module)
The two sexes / Different blood and immune system types
Personality traits and personality disorders (may represent alternative behavioral strategies dependent on the frequency of the strategy in the population)
Mismatch between ancestral & current environments
Modern diet-related Type 2 Diabetes
More frequent modern interaction with strangers (compared to family and close friends) may predispose greater incidence of depression & anxiety
Tails of normal (bell shaped) curve
Very short or tall height
Tails of the distribution of personality traits (e.g., extremely introverted or extroverted)
See several topic areas, and the associated references, below.
Charles Darwin did not discuss the implications of his work for medicine, though biologists quickly appreciated the germ theory of disease and its implications for understanding the evolution of pathogens, as well as an organism's need to defend against them.
medicine has modelled itself after a mechanical physics, deriving from Galileo, Newton, and Descartes.... As a result of assuming this model, medicine is mechanistic, materialistic, reductionistic, linear-causal, and deterministic (capable of precise predictions) in its concepts. It seeks explanations for diseases, or their symptoms, signs, and cause in single, materialistic— i.e., anatomical or structural (e.g., in genes and their products)— changes within the body, wrought directly (linearly), for example, by infectious, toxic, or traumatic agents.[74]p. 510
all biological traits need two kinds of explanation, both proximate and evolutionary. The proximate explanation for a disease describes what is wrong in the bodily mechanism of individuals affected by it. An evolutionary explanation is completely different. Instead of explaining why people are different, it explains why we are all the same in ways that leave us vulnerable to disease. Why do we all have wisdom teeth, an appendix, and cells that can divide out of control?[76]
The paper of Paul Ewald in 1980, "Evolutionary Biology and the Treatment of Signs and Symptoms of Infectious Disease",[77] and that of Williams and Nesse in 1991, "The Dawn of Darwinian Medicine"[78] were key developments. The latter paper "draw a favorable reception",[43]page x and led to a book, Why We Get Sick (published as Evolution and healing in the UK). In 2008, an online journal started: Evolution and Medicine Review.
In 2000, Paul Sherman hypothesised that morning sickness could be an adaptation that protects the developing fetus from foodborne illnesses, some of which can cause miscarriage or birth defects, such as listeriosis and toxoplasmosis.[79]
^Aiello LC, Wheeler P (1995). "The Expensive-Tissue Hypothesis: The Brain and the Digestive System in Human and Primate Evolution". Current Anthropology. 36 (2): 199–221. doi:10.1086/204350. S2CID144317407.
^Eaton SB, Konner M, Shostak M (April 1988). "Stone agers in the fast lane: chronic degenerative diseases in evolutionary perspective". The American Journal of Medicine. 84 (4): 739–49. doi:10.1016/0002-9343(88)90113-1. PMID3135745.
^Knowler WC, Bennett PH, Hamman RF, Miller M (December 1978). "Diabetes incidence and prevalence in Pima Indians: a 19-fold greater incidence than in Rochester, Minnesota". American Journal of Epidemiology. 108 (6): 497–505. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112648. PMID736028.
^Eaton SB, Strassman BI, Nesse RM, Neel JV, Ewald PW, Williams GC, Weder AB, Eaton SB, Lindeberg S, Konner MJ, Mysterud I, Cordain L (February 2002). "Evolutionary health promotion"(PDF). Preventive Medicine. 34 (2): 109–18. doi:10.1006/pmed.2001.0876. PMID11817903. Archived from the original(PDF) on 2008-12-17. Retrieved 2008-08-21.
^ abStraub, R. H., del Rey, A., Besedovsky, H. O. (2007) "Emerging concepts for the pathogenesis of chronic disabling inflammatory diseases: neuroendocrine-immune interactions and evolutionary biology" In: Ader, R. (2007) "Psychoneuroimmunology", Volume 1, Academic Press, San Diego, pp.217-232
^ abStraub RH, Besedovsky HO, Del Rey A (2007). "[Why are there analogous disease mechanisms in chronic inflammatory diseases?]". Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift (in German). 119 (15–16): 444–54. doi:10.1007/s00508-007-0834-z. PMID17721763. S2CID22737085.
^Profet M (September 1993). "Menstruation as a defense against pathogens transported by sperm". The Quarterly Review of Biology. 68 (3): 335–86. doi:10.1086/418170. PMID8210311. S2CID23738569.
^Strassmann BI (June 1996). "The evolution of endometrial cycles and menstruation". The Quarterly Review of Biology. 71 (2): 181–220. doi:10.1086/419369. PMID8693059. S2CID6207295.
^Finn CA (1998). "Menstruation: A nonadaptive consequence of uterine evolution". The Quarterly Review of Biology. 73 (2): 163–173. doi:10.1086/420183. PMID9618925. S2CID25135630.
^Flaxman SM, Sherman PW (June 2000). "Morning sickness: a mechanism for protecting mother and embryo". The Quarterly Review of Biology. 75 (2): 113–48. doi:10.1086/393377. PMID10858967. S2CID28668687.
^Flaxman SM, Sherman PW (July 2008). "Morning sickness: adaptive cause or nonadaptive consequence of embryo viability?". The American Naturalist. 172 (1): 54–62. doi:10.1086/588081. PMID18500939. S2CID43837203.
^Wick G, Perschinka H, Millonig G (December 2001). "Atherosclerosis as an autoimmune disease: an update". Trends in Immunology. 22 (12): 665–9. doi:10.1016/S1471-4906(01)02089-0. PMID11738996.
^Neel JV, Weder AB, Julius S (1998). "Type II diabetes, essential hypertension, and obesity as "syndromes of impaired genetic homeostasis": the "thrifty genotype" hypothesis enters the 21st century". Perspectives in Biology and Medicine. 42 (1): 44–74. doi:10.1353/pbm.1998.0060. PMID9894356. S2CID37780633.
^Eaton SB, Konner M (January 1985). "Paleolithic nutrition. A consideration of its nature and current implications". The New England Journal of Medicine. 312 (5): 283–9. doi:10.1056/NEJM198501313120505. PMID2981409.
^Williams TN (August 2006). "Human red blood cell polymorphisms and malaria". Current Opinion in Microbiology. 9 (4): 388–94. doi:10.1016/j.mib.2006.06.009. PMID16815736.
^Grinde B (June 2005). "An approach to the prevention of anxiety-related disorders based on evolutionary medicine". Preventive Medicine. 40 (6): 904–9. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.08.001. PMID15850894.
Williams G, Nesse RM (1996). Why We Get Sick: the new science of Darwinian medicine. New York: Vintage Books. ISBN978-0-679-74674-4.
Stearns SC, Koella JK (2008). Evolution in health and disease (2nd ed.). Oxford [Oxfordshire]: Oxford University Press. ISBN978-0-19-920745-9.
McKenna JJ, Trevathan W, Smith EO (2008). Evolutionary medicine and health: new perspectives (2nd ed.). Oxford [Oxfordshire]: Oxford University Press. ISBN978-0-19-530706-1.
O'Higgins P, Elton S (2008). Medicine and Evolution: Current Applications, Future Prospects (Society for the Study of Human Biology Symposium Series (Sshb). Boca Raton: CRC. ISBN978-1-4200-5134-6.
Childs B, Wiener C, Valle D (2005). "A science of the individual: implications for a medical school curriculum". Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics. 6 (1): 313–30. doi:10.1146/annurev.genom.6.080604.162345. PMID16124864.