PROFILPELAJAR.COM

__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Okeyes_(WMF)-2013-03-13T22:28:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Article_Feedback_deployment-2013-03-13T22:28:00.000Z","replies":["c-Okeyes_(WMF)-2013-03-13T22:28:00.000Z-Article_Feedback_deployment","c-Ronnykoh-2013-04-22T07:06:00.000Z-Article_Feedback_deployment","c-Ronnykoh-2013-04-22T17:25:00.000Z-Article_Feedback_deployment"],"text":"Article Feedback deployment","linkableTitle":"Article Feedback deployment"}-->

Article Feedback deployment

__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Okeyes_(WMF)-2013-03-13T22:28:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Article_Feedback_deployment-2013-03-13T22:28:00.000Z","replies":["c-Okeyes_(WMF)-2013-03-13T22:28:00.000Z-Article_Feedback_deployment","c-Ronnykoh-2013-04-22T07:06:00.000Z-Article_Feedback_deployment","c-Ronnykoh-2013-04-22T17:25:00.000Z-Article_Feedback_deployment"]}}-->

__DTLATESTCOMMENTTHREAD__{"id":"c-Ronnykoh-2013-04-22T17:25:00.000Z-Article_Feedback_deployment","timestamp":"2013-04-22T17:25:00.000Z"}__-->__DTCOMMENTCOUNT__3__-->__DTAUTHORCOUNT__2__-->

__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Okeyes_(WMF)-2013-03-13T22:28:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Article_Feedback_deployment-2013-03-13T22:28:00.000Z","replies":["c-Okeyes_(WMF)-2013-03-13T22:28:00.000Z-Article_Feedback_deployment","c-Ronnykoh-2013-04-22T07:06:00.000Z-Article_Feedback_deployment","c-Ronnykoh-2013-04-22T17:25:00.000Z-Article_Feedback_deployment"],"text":"Article Feedback deployment","linkableTitle":"Article Feedback deployment"}-->

Hey Thosjleep; I'm dropping you this note because you've used the article feedback tool in the last month or so. On Thursday and Friday the tool will be down for a major deployment; it should be up by Saturday, failing anything going wrong, and by Monday if something does :). Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 22:28, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-03-13T22:28:00.000Z","author":"Okeyes (WMF)","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Okeyes_(WMF)-2013-03-13T22:28:00.000Z-Article_Feedback_deployment","replies":[]}}-->

For randomized experiments, I believe that A/B testing is actually superfluous and should be combined, or redirected to randomized experiments. A/B test is a simple randomized experiment. But I wanted to start small to understand concerns folks like you might have. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ronnykoh (talk • contribs) 07:06, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-04-22T07:06:00.000Z","author":"Ronnykoh","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Ronnykoh-2013-04-22T07:06:00.000Z-Article_Feedback_deployment","replies":[]}}-->

For randomized experiments, shouldn't we move this discussion to the talk section of the article itself? Thosjleep wrote: "I think A/B testing gets its own article because it's a relatively important paradigm shift in web design, commerce, etc...." but I believe it's incorrect to invent new names for the same underlying statistical methodology, when there are few fundamental differences. Yahoo uses "bucket testing," Microsoft uses "flights," I've heard "1% experiments," "split testing," etc. A/B testing is a poor name, as it implies only two variants. Ronnykoh (talk) 17:25, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-04-22T17:25:00.000Z","author":"Ronnykoh","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Ronnykoh-2013-04-22T17:25:00.000Z-Article_Feedback_deployment","replies":[]}}-->

__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2015-11-24T13:58:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-ArbCom_elections_are_now_open!-2015-11-24T13:58:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2015-11-24T13:58:00.000Z-ArbCom_elections_are_now_open!"],"text":"ArbCom elections are now open!","linkableTitle":"ArbCom elections are now open!"}-->

ArbCom elections are now open!

__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2015-11-24T13:58:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-ArbCom_elections_are_now_open!-2015-11-24T13:58:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2015-11-24T13:58:00.000Z-ArbCom_elections_are_now_open!"]}}-->

__DTLATESTCOMMENTTHREAD__{"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2015-11-24T13:58:00.000Z-ArbCom_elections_are_now_open!","timestamp":"2015-11-24T13:58:00.000Z"}__-->__DTCOMMENTCOUNT__1__-->__DTAUTHORCOUNT__1__-->

__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2015-11-24T13:58:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-ArbCom_elections_are_now_open!-2015-11-24T13:58:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2015-11-24T13:58:00.000Z-ArbCom_elections_are_now_open!"],"text":"ArbCom elections are now open!","linkableTitle":"ArbCom elections are now open!"}-->

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-11-24T13:58:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2015-11-24T13:58:00.000Z-ArbCom_elections_are_now_open!","replies":[]}}-->

__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Squallelf-2020-11-08T14:50:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-carryover_effect-2020-11-08T14:50:00.000Z","replies":["c-Squallelf-2020-11-08T14:50:00.000Z-carryover_effect"],"text":"carryover effect","linkableTitle":"carryover effect"}-->

carryover effect

__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Squallelf-2020-11-08T14:50:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-carryover_effect-2020-11-08T14:50:00.000Z","replies":["c-Squallelf-2020-11-08T14:50:00.000Z-carryover_effect"]}}-->

__DTLATESTCOMMENTTHREAD__{"id":"c-Squallelf-2020-11-08T14:50:00.000Z-carryover_effect","timestamp":"2020-11-08T14:50:00.000Z"}__-->__DTCOMMENTCOUNT__1__-->__DTAUTHORCOUNT__1__-->

__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Squallelf-2020-11-08T14:50:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-carryover_effect-2020-11-08T14:50:00.000Z","replies":["c-Squallelf-2020-11-08T14:50:00.000Z-carryover_effect"],"text":"carryover effect","linkableTitle":"carryover effect"}-->

I'm not sure if you know what is carryover effect in clinical chemistry. I work in medical lab as technologist for many year and an expert in analyzer evaluation comply with iso 15189 under hoklas, which have mra with most major accreditation body.

The current redirection of carryover effect to the "repeated measurement design" is totally nonsense That article is nothing to do with carryover.

It is even better leave the page empty, rather that redirect it to a totally unrelated pages.

I would admit the page i created is too simple, with too little info

But it is at least better that the UNRELATED information which might misslead reader. Ian K.L.Poon (talk) 14:50, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2020-11-08T14:50:00.000Z","author":"Squallelf","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Squallelf-2020-11-08T14:50:00.000Z-carryover_effect","replies":[],"displayName":"Ian K.L.Poon"}}-->