__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2019-07-02T20:12:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiCup_2019_July_newsletter-2019-07-02T20:12:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2019-07-02T20:12:00.000Z-WikiCup_2019_July_newsletter"],"text":"WikiCup 2019 July newsletter","linkableTitle":"WikiCup 2019 July newsletter"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2019-07-02T20:12:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiCup_2019_July_newsletter-2019-07-02T20:12:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2019-07-02T20:12:00.000Z-WikiCup_2019_July_newsletter"],"text":"WikiCup 2019 July newsletter","linkableTitle":"WikiCup 2019 July newsletter"}-->
The third round of the 2019 WikiCup has now come to an end. The 16 users who made it to the fourth round needed to score at least 68 points, which is substantially lower than last year's 227 points. Our top scorers in round 3 were:
Cas Liber, our winner in 2016, with 500 points derived mainly from a featured article and two GAs on natural history topics
Adam Cuerden, with 480 points, a tally built on 16 featured pictures, the result of meticulous restoration work
SounderBruce, a finalist in the last two years, with 306 points from a variety of submissions, mostly related to sport or the State of Washington
Usernameunique, with 305 points derived from a featured article and two GAs on archaeology and related topics
Contestants managed 4 (5) featured articles, 4 featured lists, 18 featured pictures, 29 good articles, 50 DYK entries, 9 ITN entries, and 39 good article reviews. As we enter the fourth round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them, and it is imperative to claim them in the correct round; one FA claim had to be rejected because it was incorrectly submitted (claimed in Round 3 when it qualified for Round 2), so be warned! When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:12, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2019-07-02T20:12:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2019-07-02T20:12:00.000Z-WikiCup_2019_July_newsletter","replies":[]}}-->
The Hurricane Herald is the arbitrarily periodical newsletter of WikiProject Tropical Cyclones. The newsletter aims to provide in summary the recent activities and developments of the WikiProject, in addition to global tropical cyclone activity. The Hurricane Herald has been running since its first edition ran on June 4, 2006; it has been almost thirteen years since that time. If you wish to receive or discontinue subscription to this newsletter, please visit the mailing list. This issue of The Hurricane Herald covers all project related events from June 1–July 31, 2019. This edition's editor and author is ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) .
Please visit this page and bookmark any suggestions of interest to you. This will help improve the newsletter and other cyclone-related articles. Past editions can be viewed here.
Hurricane Barry was the wettest tropical storm on record in Arkansas, and one of only four hurricanes to strike Louisiana in July. Originating from a trough over the southeastern United States, Barry formed on July 11 off the southeast Louisiana coast. Despite wind shear and an asymmetrical structure, the storm intensified into a minimal hurricane before making landfall near Intracoastal City, Louisiana. Barry dropped heavy rainfall from the Gulf of Mexico to the Ohio Valley, peaking at 23.43 in (595 mm) near Ragley, Louisiana. The storm caused flooding rains, power outages, and one death due to rip currents. Damage totaled over US$500 million.
The Atlantic hurricane season, and the Central Pacific hurricane season, began on June 1. The 2019-20 tropical cyclone year in the Southern Hemisphere began on July 1 in the South-West Indian Ocean, Australian region, and South Pacific.
Since the last newsletter, 18 other systems have formed worldwide, in addition to Barry.
Western Pacific
In the Western Pacific, Tropical Storm Sepat in June passed near Japan and was classified as a subtropical storm by the JTWC. In early July, Tropical Storm Mun killed two people when it struck Vietnam. Tropical Storm Danas formed near the Philippines and moved northward, later crossing the Korean peninsula. Toward the end of July, Tropical Storm Nari moved across Japan as a tropical depression, and Tropical Storm Wipha struck southern China. There were also three tropical depressions, one of which the JTWC classified as a tropical storm.
Short-lived Tropical Depression Three formed near the Bahamas and dissipated east of Florida in late July
North Indian Ocean
Cyclone Vayu was a powerful cyclone that threatened western India, but stalled and weakened significantly before moving ashore. The storm killed eight people, and lashed western India with heavy rainfall and high tides.
South-West Indian Ocean
In late July, Zone of Disturbed Weather 01 lasted for a few days east of Madagascar in the southern hemisphere winter.
New WikiProject Members since the last newsletter in June/July 2019
More information can be found here. This list lists members who have joined/rejoined the WikiProject since the release of the last issue in May 2019. Sorted chronologically. Struckout users denote users who have left or have been banned.
To our new members: welcome to the project, and happy editing! Feel free to check the to-do list at the bottom right of the newsletter for things that you might want to work on. To our veteran members: thank you for your edits and your tireless contributions!
Current assessment table
Assessments valid as of this printing. Depending on when you may be viewing this newsletter, the table may be outdated. See here for the latest, most up to date statistics. As of this issue, there are 152 featured articles and 70 featured lists. There are 142 A-class articles, but that number is subject to change, depending if we mandate that all A-class articles have an A-class review first. There are 961 good articles, meaning it is possible we get to our 1000th GA by the end of the year. There are only 62 B-class articles, perhaps because because most articles of that quality already passed a GA review. There are 363 C-class articles, 717 start-class articles, and 141 stub-class articles, with 26 lists and 9 current articles. The number of lists may decrease further as the "Tropical cyclone X" articles continue to be reclassified as set index articles. These figures mean that more than half of the project is rated a GA or better - including the lists/current/future articles, there are 1283 articles that are below GA status, versus 1325 that are GA or better.
Reports, bulletins, and other products issued by Regional Specialized Meteorological Centers are the authoritative source on meteorological information pertaining to tropical cyclones in their respective basins. This includes both quantitative and qualitative information about a storm's characteristics, including intensities, durations, and locations. The most recent post-storm assessments take precedence over operational data. Thus, post-season revisions to a storm's "best track" file, new information presented in a tropical cyclone report, or official database adjustments made by the Atlantic hurricane reanalysis project, or other official reanalyses supersede operational information where they disagree. Data in operational RSMC products can still be used if later data does not dispute them. Information from other public agencies can also be used, but generally require in-text attribution. While the original best track data from meteorological agencies is a reliable source and can be referenced, readers often find difficulty interpreting them. Consider using IBTrACS, a more easily understandable track database, which is endorsed by the World Meteorological Organization (WMO), for this information. Because the Automated Tropical Cyclone Forecasting System (ATCF) used by the Joint Typhoon Warning Center and National Hurricane Center is liable to change frequently in realtime, they should not be used for currently active storms. Forecasts from these agencies and RSMCs should only be used to cite the forecasts themselves; in other words, they can only be used to describe what was expected to occur, and never to describe what did occur.
Maps and other graphics published by meteorological agencies may be used to describe events (see the associated essay). However, they should only be referenced if they are explicit in conveying the supported information and do not require any rigorous meteorological interpretation (such as satellite analysis or drawing conclusions over what the arrangement of meteorological features represents). In general, self-published sources should not be used as sources for present or historical storm intensities. However, information contained in articles from reliable sources or commentary from established tropical cyclone experts can be used as sources for information not covered by WMO-endorsed agencies. If such sources dispute WMO-endorsed meteorological data, commentary on the disputed information may be used, making sure to attribute claims and giving due weight.
Storm effects are typically referenced with a wide array of published sources. These may include news organizations, risk assessment organizations, non-governmental organizations (NGO), government agencies, and impact databases. So long as they are reliable sources, they can be used as references for tropical cyclone impacts. Note that figures from early impact reports, often disseminated by the first NGO situation reports and news reports, may quickly be outdated in light of newer information. When sourcing damage totals or casualty figures, use the most recent value from a reliable source, as these values tend to be more stable and use more up-to-date information. If such figures are disputed by other reliable sources, this should be noted in the article, making sure to attribute claims and giving due weight. Routine calculations of damage and casualty figures (for instance, adding casualties from different countries) are acceptable as long as they arise from reliable sources.
Latest WikiProject Alerts
The following are the latest article developments as updated by AAlertBot, as of the publishing of this issue. Due to the bot workings, some of these updates may seem out of place; nonetheless, they are included here.
The article for hurricane (tropical cyclone) was created on December 2, 2001. On October 3, 2002, User:Ed Poor created an article for Hurricane Lili while the storm was active and near peak intensity; since then, 163 other people have edited the article to help make it a . In March 2004, User:BigT27 created an article for the hyperactive 1995 Atlantic hurricane season, then the 3rd most-active Atlantic hurricane season on record. On August 14 of that year, an article was created for Hurricane Iniki, the first non-Atlantic storm, and on August 31, the 1900 Galveston hurricane became the first TC-related . On October 4, 2004, Cyclone Tracy became featured, which was the 2nd FA in the project. A week later, User:Golbez created the article for 2004 Pacific hurricane season, which was the first season article for the EPAC.
On August 26, 2005, User:CrazyC83 created an article for Hurricane Katrina after the legendary storm crossed over southern Florida. By two days later, there were 500 edits to the article, and the hurricane was threatening to hit New Orleans as a Category 4 or 5. We now know it was “only” a Category 3 at landfall. In the 14 years since Katrina, there have been 6,327 editors to the Hurricane Katrina article, along with 23 sub-articles. During the 2005 season, there were debates among editors whether lesser notable storms, like Hurricane Cindy (2005), should have articles. At one point in 2006, there were articles for every named storm during the 2005 AHS, but in the 13 years since then, articles for tropical storms Franklin, Harvey, and Lee, and Philippe were created and merged. As a way to coordinate edits among the tropical cyclone pages, User:Jdorje created Template:Hurricane on September 12, 2005. This is the same template that appears on the talk pages for every article in the WPTC. On October 5, Jdorje officially created WP:WPTC, the tropical cycloneWikiProject. That October, in quick succession, the Atlantic hurricane seasons reached back to the beginning of recordkeeping (before 1600s) due to a collaboration of several editors; User:RattleMan created the first season article for the North Indian Ocean; User:Miss Madeline successfully nominated List of California hurricanes for featured list; and Jdorje created a a standardized storm path template.
In 2006, a series of users improved articles worldwide to featured article status. Professional met David Roth joined the project, and in the same year, the NOAA and NHC copied some material from Wikipedia, including track maps, and the Tropical Cyclone Report for Tropical Storm Chris (2006). In June 2006, User:Nilfanion created the project assessment page, which documents the status of every article, organized by basin, the year, and storm shaded by the quality. On August 1, the chat room on IRC for the project was created, which allowed real-time communication among editors. There’s something special about conversing with fellow weather geeks during an epic storm, which seems to have become all the more common. On January 1, 2007, the number of good articles in the project reached 100. On January 29th, a collaboration of users made the List of retired Pacific hurricane names the first featured topic in the project. It was joined by the 2003 Atlantic hurricane season in March 2007.
In 2008, further collaborations helped make the article for tropical cyclone a featured article, one of 100 FA’s in the project. Notably among project members, Tropical Storm Erick (2007) became featured on December 14, 2008. The storm lasted for a short amount of time over open waters, and as such, it was the shortest featured article anywhere on Wikipedia. Users questioned whether the storm was notable enough to have such a detailed article, but the article described the storm in articulate detail. After an AFD and two featured article review (and a series of low-notability storms being merged), Erick was delisted as a featured article on March 2, 2013.
In the period from 2008 to 2013, users created task forces for various basins, articles for all of the seasons in the Atlantic and EPAC, and enough high-quality articles that more than half of all storm/season articles were good or featured articles. In January 2008, there were 1000 articles in the entire project. On January 1, 2014, User:Yellow Evan created Typhoon Nancy (1982), which was the 2000th article in the project. In October 2008, there were 100 FA’s in the project, which reached 200 on November 28, 2015, with Hurricane Fay (2014). By March 2016, every basin had at least 100 storm articles, multiple featured articles, and season articles of various quality.
Featured Content
This section lists content that have become featured, articles and lists, since the past newsletter in mid-April 2019. From June 1–July 31, 2019, one featured article and one featured list was promoted:
An awards program for the project began on May 31. It involves 25 levels that may be gained by earning points for completing various actions such as getting good or featured articles. Additional awards will be added in the future.
In June 2019, the most popular article in the project was Cyclone Fani, viewed 139,696 times during the month. The generic cyclone was 2nd most popular, with 91,890 views. In 3rd place was the 2019 Atlantic hurricane season with 90,741 views, followed by Hurricane Katrina with 78,591 views. Included in the top 20 were the 2019 season articles for EPAC, WPAC, and NIO, TFA Cyclone Raja, 2018 and 19 Atlantic hurricane seasons, hurricanes Michael, Harvey, Maria, and Sandy. In July 2019, Hurricane Barry (2019) was viewed 85,793 times, with a peak on the day after the storm moved ashore.
WPTC 15th Anniversary push: some goals for the 15th year of WPTC include the creation or improvement of many other articles listed in the first section on the WPTC talk page.
Project Goals & Progress
The following is the current progress on the three milestone goals set by the WikiProject as of this publishing. They can be found, updated, at the main WikiProject page.
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Gerda_Arendt-2019-08-12T06:09:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Today's_Wikipedian_10_years_ago-2019-08-12T06:09:00.000Z","replies":["c-Gerda_Arendt-2019-08-12T06:09:00.000Z-Today's_Wikipedian_10_years_ago"],"text":"Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago","linkableTitle":"Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Gerda_Arendt-2019-08-12T06:09:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Today's_Wikipedian_10_years_ago-2019-08-12T06:09:00.000Z","replies":["c-Gerda_Arendt-2019-08-12T06:09:00.000Z-Today's_Wikipedian_10_years_ago"],"text":"Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago","linkableTitle":"Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago"}-->
Thank you alaso for having added names to that list. You are remembered! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:09, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2019-08-12T06:09:00.000Z","author":"Gerda Arendt","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Gerda_Arendt-2019-08-12T06:09:00.000Z-Today's_Wikipedian_10_years_ago","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2019-09-01T18:44:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiCup_2019_September_newsletter-2019-09-01T18:44:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2019-09-01T18:44:00.000Z-WikiCup_2019_September_newsletter"],"text":"WikiCup 2019 September newsletter","linkableTitle":"WikiCup 2019 September newsletter"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2019-09-01T18:44:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiCup_2019_September_newsletter-2019-09-01T18:44:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2019-09-01T18:44:00.000Z-WikiCup_2019_September_newsletter"],"text":"WikiCup 2019 September newsletter","linkableTitle":"WikiCup 2019 September newsletter"}-->
The fourth round of the competition has finished in a flurry of last minute activity, with 454 points being required to qualify for the final round. It was a hotly competitive round with two contestants with over 400 points being eliminated, and all but two of the finalists having achieved an FA during the round. Casliber, our 2016 winner, was the highest point-scorer, followed by Enwebb and Lee Vilenski, who are both new to the competition. In fourth place was SounderBruce, a finalist last year. But all those points are swept away as we start afresh for the final round.
Round 4 saw the achievement of 11 featured articles. In addition, Adam Cuerden scored with 18 FPs, Lee Vilenski led the GA score with 8 GAs while Kosack performed 15 GA reviews. There were around 40 DYKs, 40 GARs and 31 GAs overall during round 4. Even though contestants performed more GARs than they achieved GAs, there was still some frustration at the length of time taken to get articles reviewed.
As we start round 5, we say goodbye to the eight competitors who didn't quite make it; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia, and we hope you will join us again next year. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them (some people have fallen foul of this rule and the points have been removed).
If you are concerned that your nomination, whether it be for a good article, a featured process, or anything else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66, Vanamonde and CwmhiraethMediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:44, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2019-09-01T18:44:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2019-09-01T18:44:00.000Z-WikiCup_2019_September_newsletter","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Chris_troutman-2019-09-15T12:57:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Twelve_years_of_editing-2019-09-15T12:57:00.000Z","replies":["c-Chris_troutman-2019-09-15T12:57:00.000Z-Twelve_years_of_editing"],"text":"Twelve years of editing","linkableTitle":"Twelve years of editing"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Chris_troutman-2019-09-15T12:57:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Twelve_years_of_editing-2019-09-15T12:57:00.000Z","replies":["c-Chris_troutman-2019-09-15T12:57:00.000Z-Twelve_years_of_editing"],"text":"Twelve years of editing","linkableTitle":"Twelve years of editing"}-->
Hey, Dylan620. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day!Chris Troutman (talk)12:57, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2019-09-15T12:57:00.000Z","author":"Chris troutman","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Chris_troutman-2019-09-15T12:57:00.000Z-Twelve_years_of_editing","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Cwmhiraeth-2019-11-02T14:18:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiCup_2019_November_newsletter-2019-11-02T14:18:00.000Z","replies":["c-Cwmhiraeth-2019-11-02T14:18:00.000Z-WikiCup_2019_November_newsletter"],"text":"WikiCup 2019 November newsletter","linkableTitle":"WikiCup 2019 November newsletter"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Cwmhiraeth-2019-11-02T14:18:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiCup_2019_November_newsletter-2019-11-02T14:18:00.000Z","replies":["c-Cwmhiraeth-2019-11-02T14:18:00.000Z-WikiCup_2019_November_newsletter"],"text":"WikiCup 2019 November newsletter","linkableTitle":"WikiCup 2019 November newsletter"}-->
The WikiCup is over for another year! Our Champion this year is Adam Cuerden (submissions), who over the course of the competition has amassed 91 featured pictures, including 32 in the final round. Our finalists this year were:
All those who reached the final will win awards. The following special awards will be made based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, these prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round, or in the event of a tie, to the overall leader in this field. Awards will be handed out in the coming weeks. Please be patient!
Casliber (submissions) wins the featured article prize, for a total of 7 FAs during the course of the competition.
Muboshgu (submissions) wins the ITN prize, for 7 in the news articles in round 1.
Ed! (submissions) wins the reviewer prize, for 56 good article reviews in round 1.
Congratulations to everyone who participated in this year's WikiCup, whether you made it to the final rounds or not, and particular congratulations to the newcomers to the WikiCup who have achieved much this year. Thanks to all who have taken part and helped out with the competition, not forgetting User:Jarry1250, who runs the scoring bot.
We have opened a scoring discussion on whether the rules and scoring need adjustment. Please have your say. Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2020 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66, Vanamonde and Cwmhiraeth14:18, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2019-11-02T14:18:00.000Z","author":"Cwmhiraeth","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Cwmhiraeth-2019-11-02T14:18:00.000Z-WikiCup_2019_November_newsletter","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Kbrown_(WMF)-2019-11-13T10:44:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-A_survey_to_improve_the_community_consultation_outreach_process-2019-11-13T10:44:00.000Z","replies":["c-Kbrown_(WMF)-2019-11-13T10:44:00.000Z-A_survey_to_improve_the_community_consultation_outreach_process"],"text":"A survey to improve the community consultation outreach process","linkableTitle":"A survey to improve the community consultation outreach process"}-->
A survey to improve the community consultation outreach process
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Kbrown_(WMF)-2019-11-13T10:44:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-A_survey_to_improve_the_community_consultation_outreach_process-2019-11-13T10:44:00.000Z","replies":["c-Kbrown_(WMF)-2019-11-13T10:44:00.000Z-A_survey_to_improve_the_community_consultation_outreach_process"],"text":"A survey to improve the community consultation outreach process","linkableTitle":"A survey to improve the community consultation outreach process"}-->
Hello!
The Wikimedia Foundation is seeking to improve the community consultation outreach process for Foundation policies, and we are interested in why you didn't participate in a recent consultation that followed a community discussion you’ve been part of.
Please fill out this short survey to help us improve our community consultation process for the future. It should only take about three minutes.
The privacy policy for this survey is here. This survey is a one-off request from us related to this unique topic.
Thank you for your participation, Kbrown (WMF)10:44, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2019-11-13T10:44:00.000Z","author":"Kbrown (WMF)","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Kbrown_(WMF)-2019-11-13T10:44:00.000Z-A_survey_to_improve_the_community_consultation_outreach_process","replies":[]}}-->
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2019-11-19T00:10:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2019-11-19T00:10:00.000Z-ArbCom_2019_election_voter_message","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Cwmhiraeth-2020-01-01T11:43:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Welcome_to_the_2020_WikiCup!-2020-01-01T11:43:00.000Z","replies":["c-Cwmhiraeth-2020-01-01T11:43:00.000Z-Welcome_to_the_2020_WikiCup!"],"text":"Welcome to the 2020 WikiCup!","linkableTitle":"Welcome to the 2020 WikiCup!"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Cwmhiraeth-2020-01-01T11:43:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Welcome_to_the_2020_WikiCup!-2020-01-01T11:43:00.000Z","replies":["c-Cwmhiraeth-2020-01-01T11:43:00.000Z-Welcome_to_the_2020_WikiCup!"],"text":"Welcome to the 2020 WikiCup!","linkableTitle":"Welcome to the 2020 WikiCup!"}-->
Happy New Year, Happy New Decade and Happy New WikiCup! The competition begins today and all article creators, expanders and improvers are welcome to take part. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page. We are relaxing the rule that only content on which you have completed significant work during 2020 will count; now to be eligible for points in the competition, you must have completed significant work on the content at some time! Any questions on the rules or on anything else connected to the Cup should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. Good luck! The judges for the WikiCup are Sturmvogel 66 (talk·contribs·email), Godot13 (talk·contribs·email), Vanamonde93 (talk·contribs·email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:43, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2020-01-01T11:43:00.000Z","author":"Cwmhiraeth","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Cwmhiraeth-2020-01-01T11:43:00.000Z-Welcome_to_the_2020_WikiCup!","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2020-03-01T16:46:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiCup_2020_March_newsletter-2020-03-01T16:46:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2020-03-01T16:46:00.000Z-WikiCup_2020_March_newsletter"],"text":"WikiCup 2020 March newsletter","linkableTitle":"WikiCup 2020 March newsletter"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2020-03-01T16:46:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiCup_2020_March_newsletter-2020-03-01T16:46:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2020-03-01T16:46:00.000Z-WikiCup_2020_March_newsletter"],"text":"WikiCup 2020 March newsletter","linkableTitle":"WikiCup 2020 March newsletter"}-->
And so ends the first round of the competition. Everyone with a positive score moves on to Round 2, with 57 contestants qualifying. We have abolished the groups this year, so to qualify for Round 3 you will need to finish Round 2 among the top thirty-two contestants.
Our top scorers in Round 1 were:
Epicgenius, a WikiCup newcomer, led the field with a featured article, five good articles and an assortment of other submissions, specialising on buildings and locations in New York, for a total of 895 points.
Gog the Mild came next with 464 points, from a featured article, two good articles and a number of reviews, the main theme being naval warfare.
Raymie was in third place with 419 points, garnered from one good article and an impressive 34 DYKs on radio and TV stations in the United States.
Harrias came next at 414, with a featured article and three good articles, an English civil war battle specialist.
CaptainEek was in fifth place with 405 points, mostly garnered from bringing Cactus wren to featured article status.
The top ten contestants at the end of Round 1 all scored over 200 points; they also included L293D, Kingsif, Enwebb, Lee Vilenski and CAPTAIN MEDUSA. Seven of the top ten contestants in Round 1 are new to the WikiCup.
These contestants, like all the others, now have to start scoring points again from scratch. In Round 1 there were four featured articles, one featured list and two featured pictures, as well as around two hundred DYKs and twenty-seven ITNs. Between them, contestants completed 127 good article reviews, nearly a hundred more than the 43 good articles they claimed for, thus making a substantial dent in the review backlog. Contestants also claimed for 40 featured article / featured list reviews, and most even remembered to mention their WikiCup participation in their reviews (a requirement).
Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Some contestants made claims before the new submissions pages were set up, and they will need to resubmit them. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews.
If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:46, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2020-03-01T16:46:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2020-03-01T16:46:00.000Z-WikiCup_2020_March_newsletter","replies":[]}}-->
There was an error in the WikiCup 2020 March newsletter; L293D should not have been included in the list of top ten scorers in Round 1 (they led the list last year), instead, Dunkleosteus77 should have been included, having garnered 334 points from five good articles on animals, living or extinct, and various reviews. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:30, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2020-03-02T09:30:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2020-03-02T09:30:00.000Z-WikiCup_newsletter_correction","replies":[]}}-->
The Hurricane Herald is the semi-regular newsletter of WikiProject Tropical Cyclones. The newsletter aims to provide in summary the recent activities and developments of the WikiProject, in addition to global tropical cyclone activity. The Hurricane Herald has been running since its first edition ran on June 4, 2006; it has been almost thirteen years since that time. If you wish to receive or discontinue subscription to this newsletter, please visit the mailing list. This issue of The Hurricane Herald covers all project related events from August 1, 2019–March 17, 2020. This edition's editor and author is ♫ Hurricanehink (talk).
Please visit this page and bookmark any suggestions of interest to you. This will help improve the newsletter and other cyclone-related articles. Past editions can be viewed here.
An awards program for the project began on May 31. It involves 25 levels that may be gained by earning points for completing various actions such as getting good or featured articles. Additional awards will be added in the future.
There is ongoing featured article review for the 2005 Atlantic hurricane season. The recent look at the article stemmed from a discussion about merging the List of storms in the 2005 Atlantic hurricane season, which was created in January 2006 in response to the large season article. The 2005 article was then more of a summary, covering economic costs, the record activity, and focusing on storms by month (and not sequentially). For several years, there were a few season articles that had both a primary article and a dedicated list of storms article; all were eventually re-incorporated back into the main season article, recently including 2005 AHS. On March 3, 2020 (hard to believe that was this month), the list article was merged, as well as 2005 Atlantic hurricane season statistics, and articles for Franklin and Philippe. A singular article for the 2005 season was prepared in draftspace, and was incorporated into the main 2005 article.
The following is the current progress on the three milestone goals set by the WikiProject as of this publishing. They can be found, updated, at the main WikiProject page.
More information can be found here. This list lists members who have joined/rejoined the WikiProject since the release of the last issue in May 2019. Sorted chronologically. Struckout users denote users who have left or have been banned.
To our new members: welcome to the project, and happy editing! Feel free to check the to-do list at the bottom right of the newsletter for things that you might want to work on. To our veteran members: thank you for your edits and your tireless contributions!
Latest WikiProject Alerts
The following are the latest article developments as updated by AAlertBot, as of the publishing of this issue. Due to the bot workings, some of these updates may seem out of place; nonetheless, they are included here.
Storm of the month and other tropical activity for August
Typhoon Lekima became China's costliest typhoon ever recorded when it struck the country in early August, leaving 90 fatalities and over $9 billion in damage.
Atlantic - In August, there were two weak, short-lived tropical storms – Chantal and Erin, as well as Hurricane Dorian.
Western Pacific - in the beginning of August, Tropical Storm Wipha was active, which moved across southwestern China and Vietnam, killing 27 people in the latter country. In August and September, a series of three typhoons struck Japan, including Typhoon Francisco, Typhoon Krosa, and Typhoon Faxai. Toward the end of August, Tropical Storm Bailu struck Taiwan and China, killing three people, and Tropical Storm Podul moved through the Philippines.
North Indian Ocean - a deep depression killed three people when it struck Odisha in eastern India.
Storm of the month and other tropical activity for September
Hurricane Dorian was the strongest hurricane on record to strike The Bahamas, and was regarded as the worst natural disaster in the country's history. Dorian formed on August 24, and moved through the Caribbean as an intensifying storm. On September 1, Dorian hit Great Abaco Island with sustained winds of 185 mph (295 km/h), and struck Grand Bahama Island at the same intensity a day later. Dorian killed 58 people and left $7 billion in damage to the island nation. The hurricane later struck North Carolina as a minimal hurricane, and Nova Scotia as a post-tropical cyclone.
Atlantic - The tropics were more active in September. Tropical Storm Fernand killed one person and caused damaging floods in northeastern Mexico. Tropical Storm Gabrielle moved across the eastern Atlantic Ocean. Hurricane Humberto affected the Bahamas weeks after Dorian devastated the island chain, and later brought hurricane-force winds to Bermuda. Tropical Storm Imelda formed rapidly near the coast of Texas and dropped torrential rainfall, killing five people and inundating parts of Texas affected by Hurricane Harvey two years earlier. Hurricane Jerry and Tropical Storm Karen moved near or over the eastern Caribbean. At the end of the month, Hurricane Lorenzo became the easternmost Category 5 Atlantic hurricane, reaching that intensity in the eastern Atlantic Ocean; the hurricane caused a shipwreck, killing at least three people, and also passed through the Azores in early October.
Western Pacific - In early September, Tropical Storm Kajiki brought heavy rainfall to northeastern Vietnam, killing six people. Typhoon Lingling moved through the East China Sea before striking North Korea, killing eight people. In the middle of September, short-lived Tropical Storm Peipah dissipated south of Japan, and Typhoon Tapah passed between Japan and South Korea. At the end of the month, Typhoon Mitag was moving across South Korea. There were also a series of nine non-developing depressions.
Eastern Pacific - There were two major hurricanes in September – Juliette and Kiko. Short-lived Tropical Storm Akoni was in the Central Pacific. Toward the end of the month, Tropical Storm Mario and Hurricane Lorena interacted with each other, and the latter hurricane struck Mexico twice, killing one person. At the end of the month, Tropical Storm Narda followed a similar path to Lorena, killing four people in southwestern Mexico.
North Indian Ocean - In September, Cyclonic Storm Hikaa struck eastern Oman, killing one person. At the end of the month, a land depression formed over western India.
Storm of the month and other tropical activity for October
Typhoon Hagibis was considered the most devastating typhoon to hit the Kantō region of Japan since Ida in 1958. It struck near Tokyo on October 12, triggering heavy rainfall and landslides. Hagibis killed 95 people along its path and left about US$9 billion in damage.
Atlantic - a series of weaker storms formed in October, beginning with Melissa, which caused significant flooding along the east coast of the United States from its predecessor extratropical low. After a weak tropical depression formed near Cabo Verde, there were two tropical storms in the Gulf of Mexico – Nestor and Olga, which together left more than $250 million in damage and four fatalities to the United States gulf coast. Later in the month, Hurricane Pablo became the easternmost storm on record to attain hurricane status, having originated from a nontropical storm near the Azores. A few days later, Subtropical Storm Rebekah formed in the same region.
Eastern Pacific - there were three cyclones in the Eastern Pacific during the month, beginning with short-lived Ema in the Central Pacific. Later, Tropical Storm Octave lasted two days over open waters, and Tropical Storm Priscilla moved ashore near Manzanillo.
Western Pacific - in addition to Hagibis, two other storms formed in the western Pacific during October. Typhoon Neoguri and Typhoon Bualoi existed south of Japan. At the end of the month, Tropical Storm Matmo struck Vietnam, which later redeveloped in the North Indian Ocean as Cyclone Bulbul.
North Indian Ocean - there were two storms in the North Indian Ocean during October. The first was Super Cyclonic Storm Kyarr, which was the strongest storm on record in the Arabian Sea; the cyclone produced high waves throughout the basin, but didn't strike land. Later in the month, Cyclone Maha formed in the Arabian Sea, marking the first time on record there were two simultaneous storms in the body of water. Maha eventually struck Gujarat in western India as a depression.
Storm of the month and other tropical activity for November
Cyclone Bulbul formed in the Bay of Bengal from the remnants of Tropical Storm Matmo, which struck Vietnam in late October. Bulbul intensified into the record-breaking sixth very intense tropical cyclone (the NIO equivalent to a hurricane). On November 9, Bulbul made landfall near the India/Bangladesh border, killing 38 people and leaving US$2.6 billion in damage.
Atlantic - Tropical Storm Sebastien formed northeast of the Lesser Antilles and moved across much of the Atlantic, becoming an extratropical cyclone near the Azores.
Western Pacific - Typhoon Halong was the strongest storm of the year worldwide, reaching winds of 215 km/h (130 mph) according to the JMA. The storm remained away from land. Also in the month, Typhoon Nakri struck Vietnam, killing six people. Typhoon Fengshen struck the northern Marianas Islands. Typhoon Kalmaegi and Tropical Storm Fung-wong affected the northern Philippines in short succession. Later in the month, Typhoon Kammuri formed, moving through the Philippines in early December, where it caused US$116 million in damage and 12 deaths.
South Pacific - Cyclone Rita passed through the Solomon Islands.
ChocolateTrain first joined Wikipedia in April 2017. An Australian native, he is already a prolific writer on the Australian basin, and is responsible for half the edits to the current Australian cyclone season. ChocolateTrain wrote good articles on Cyclone Lili (2019) and Cyclone Nora, plus several articles that are C-class. We thank ChocolateTrain for his edits, and hopes he keeps writing about southern hemisphere storms!
From the Main Page documents WikiProject related materials that have appeared on the main page from August 1, 2019–March 17, 2020 in chronological order.
Assessments valid as of this printing. Depending on when you may be viewing this newsletter, the table may be outdated. See here for the latest, most up to date statistics. As of this issue, there are 154 featured articles and 70 featured lists. There are 134 A-class articles, but that number is subject to change, depending if we mandate that all A-class articles have an A-class review first. There are 974 good articles. There are only 63 B-class articles, perhaps because because most articles of that quality already passed a GA review. There are 374 C-class articles, 733 start-class articles, and 150 stub-class articles, with 32 lists, and 9 current articles. These figures mean that slightly more than half of the project is rated a GA or better - including the lists/current/future articles, there are 1320 articles that are below GA status, versus 1334 that are GA or better.
There is a discussion about getting rid of redirect and list-class articles.
WPTC 15th Anniversary push: some goals for the 15th year of WPTC include the creation or improvement of many other articles listed in the first section on the WPTC talk page.
Collaborating - AKA the right kind of sharing, by User:Hurricanehink
As mentioned elsewhere in the newsletter, 2005 Atlantic hurricane season has changed recently. It was a collaborative effort of several users, making sure this top-importance vital article is still of featured-quality. (There is an ongoing discussion about removing its featured article status).
There are other kinds of collaborations. Recently, users Juliancolton and TropicalAnalystwx13 wrote Tropical Storm Kirk (2018) together. Each year, the season articles are written by many editors, by folks who add the latest satellite imagery or track. There are others who document the storm's journey, and what impacts they left. When a major storm is threatening a landmass (especially the United States), users edit from IP addresses far and wide to add the latest information. Unfortunately, some of these big storm articles languish, because they're written in real time without historical perspective, and the websites might no longer be up and running a few years later. Don't get me wrong, I know the excitement of being the first to write on Wikipedia when the NHC classifies something. However, there are lots of older articles that end up half-finished, or with broken weblinks. Thankfully we have the web archive.
We see the disruption that Covid-19 is causing in our world right now. Yea, it sucks to have everything canceled, for schools and bars and gyms and restaurants to be shut down. Some people experience that same feeling every few years when a hurricane/typhoon/cyclone strikes. It's easy writing/researching about these furious beasts of nature when we're in the comfort of our own home/office/library/school. And sometimes it's uncomfortable seeing how we rebuild. After every storm, there is help, often from the government. Politics have made my country turn fearful and hateful, and so I have to choose my words carefully. When nature is at its worst, my government is there after when people need it the most, providing financial assistance, logistical support, and a sense of national unity.
This pandemic is making a lot of people fearful of the unknown, how bad that unstoppable force will be. A lot of us may be stuck at home right now with a sense of fear and too much time on our hands. Consider, then, the spirit of collaboration, working together to document the world around us. If you're reading this, you are likely interested in meteorology. Go improve an article then. Now. Do it. :P Stop reading this and find an article you're interested in, and make it better. <3
Tropical cyclones by year
In 2019, there have been 143 tropical or subtropical cyclones. We (the thousands of editors who are writing the first draft of history in the middle of Earth's biggest climate crisis in many millennia) are writing the first draft of history. There might be edit wars, conflicts over whether a source is reliable, and maybe even a controversy surrounding a sharpie, Alabama, and a NWS weather map (see also Hurricane Dorian–Alabama controversy, AKA Sharpiegate). 2019 has featured several significant storms: Cyclone Idai, one of the deadliest tropical cyclones in the southern hemisphere. Cyclone Kenneth was the strongest cyclone to strike Mozambique. In February, Typhoon Wutip was the strongest tropical cyclone ever recorded in the month of February.
The storms in 2019 represent about 0.116% of the known tropical cyclones on Wikipedia. We're aware of around 12,000 tropical cyclones; about one-third were in the Western Pacific, where storms have killed more than 1.4 million people. Storms in the western Pacific date back to the year 957, during the Five Dynasties and Ten Kingdoms period. In the Atlantic, we know of 2,443 tropical cyclones, dating back to 1494, and Christopher Columbus's 2nd voyage to the New World; however, paleotempestological evidence] of storms date back to 1330 BC. In the eastern Pacific, storms date back to 1537, when a hurricane struck Mexico and was recorded by a missionary. Storms in the South Pacific Ocean date back to 1568, and in the South Indian Ocean to 1615. Wikipedia coverage in the North Indian Ocean goes back to 1721.
Storm of the month and other tropical activity for December
Cyclone Ambali was the first very intense tropical cyclone in the South-west Indian Ocean since Cyclone Fantala in 2016. It formed on December 3 as part of a series of storms in the western Indian Ocean in both hemispheres. Ambali's winds increased by 185 km/h (115 mph) in 24 hours, marking the fastest 24-hour intensification recorded in the Southern Hemisphere. The storm rapidly weakened after its peak, degenerating into a remnant low by December 8.
Western Pacific - Typhoon Phanfone moved through the central Philippines on Christmas Day, killing 50 people. Damage was estimated at US$67.2 million, enough to warrant the retirement of its international name, as well its local Filipino name Ursula.
North Indian - Cyclonic Storm Pawan formed in early December in the western Arabian Sea. It struck Somalia, causing flooding rains that killed six people. Pawan existed simultaneously to a deep depression off India's west coast, which killed 25 people. The season ended on December 10 when another deep depression formed in the Arabian Sea, which dissipated near the Somalia coastline.
South-west Indian Ocean - Cyclone Belna developed west of Cyclone Ambali, and struck northwestern Madagascar on December 9. The storm killed nine people and left US$25 million in damage. Cyclone Calvinina formed at the end of the month, passing near Mauritius on December 31, causing power outages and flooding. The storm became extratropical the next day.
South Pacific - There were two December tropical cyclones – a tropical depression, and Tropical Cyclone Sarai. Sarai passed near Fiji on December 27, causing two deaths and US$2.3 million in damage.
Storm of the month and other tropical activity for January
Cyclone Tino was part of a broader convergence zone that affected ten South Pacific countries. Tino formed on January 11, and passed near Fiji on January 17 with winds of 120 km/h (75 mph), where two people were left missing. Tino became extratropical two days later.
South Atlantic - Subtropical Storm Kurumí formed on January 23 south of São Paulo. It existed for two days, until it was absorbed by a larger weather system that killed three people in Brazil.
South-West Indian Ocean - A series of three systems formed in the second half of the month, beginning with a short-lived tropical depression. Tropical Storm Diane moved across Madagascar in its formative stages, killing 31 people. It later passed near Mauritius, and eventually became extratropical. Tropical Storm Esami formed east of Madagascar and followed Diane's path.
Australia - the Australian season began when Tropical Cyclone Blake formed on January 4. It later struck Western Australia on the Dampier Peninsula, causing localized flooding. Simultaneous to Blake's development, Cyclone Claudia moved across Australia's Top End, dropping heavy rainfall, and eventually reached its peak intensity off northwest Australia. There were also two tropical lows during the month, including one low in the extreme southeastern Gulf of Carpentaria, which dropped 475 mm (18.7 in) of rainfall in Queensland.
South Pacific - Toward the end of the month, there was a short-lived tropical disturbance near American Samoa.
Storm of the month and other tropical activity for February
Cyclone Damien struck Western Australia near Karratha on February 8, having originated from a monsoon trough five days later. Damien caused localized flooding and power outages.
South-west Indian - Tropical Storm Francisco lasted for nearly two weeks, beginning as a short-lived storm near the Chagos, and moving across much of the basin as a weak disturbance. Francisco regenerated into a tropical storm near eastern Madagascar, moving ashore near Mahanoro; it killed one person in the country. Also in the month, Cyclone Gabekile formed on February 13, and weakened after it stalled over open waters.
Australia - there were two other storms in the basin during the month, in addition to Damien. Cyclone Esther moved across the Northern Territory, reached the coastline of the Indian Ocean, and then moved back east inland. The storm caused flooding rains along its path. Occurring simultaneously to Esther, Cyclone Ferdinand developed, intensified, and weakened off Australia's northwest coast.
South Pacific - Cyclone Uesi passed west of New Caledonia on February 11, causing flooding and power outages. It later moved into the Australian basin, where it transitioned into a subtropical cyclone. High waves killed one person in Sydney. Over a one week span, four tropical cyclones developed in the basin in short-succession near American Samoa, including two tropical disturbances. Cyclone Vicky caused power outages and flooding, followed only days later by Cyclone Wasi.
The Hurricane Herald is the semi-regular newsletter of WikiProject Tropical Cyclones. The newsletter aims to provide in summary the recent activities and developments of the WikiProject, in addition to global tropical cyclone activity. The Hurricane Herald has been running since its first edition ran on June 4, 2006. If you wish to receive or discontinue subscription to this newsletter, please visit the mailing list. This issue of The Hurricane Herald covers all project related events from March 17 to April 30, 2020. This edition's editor and author is Hurricanehink.
Please visit this page and bookmark any suggestions of interest to you. This will help improve the newsletter and other cyclone-related articles. Past editions can be viewed here.
Map plotting the track and the intensity of the storm, according to the Saffir–Simpson scale
There is a proposal to redo the tropical cyclone maps. The new maps will be zoomable, include intermediate advisory points (the current map only lists six-hour positions), and information on intensity and date when you hover over the location. There is a discussion on how to implement different scales from around the world, which would replace the current model of using JTWC data, with coloring from the Saffir-Simpson scale.
An awards program for the project began last year. It involves 25 levels that may be gained by earning points for completing various actions such as getting good or featured articles. Additional awards will be added in the future.
WPTC 15th Anniversary push: some goals for the 15th year of WPTC include the creation or improvement of many other articles listed in the first section on the WPTC talk page.
Project Goals & Progress
The following is the current progress on the three milestone goals set by the WikiProject as of this publishing. They can be found, updated, at the main WikiProject page.
Storm of the month and other tropical activity for March
Cyclone Herold (not to be confused with April's storm of the month) was an intense tropical cyclone in the southwest Indian Ocean. It formed near northeastern Madagascar, where its flooding killed five people. Herold later passed between the islands of Mauritius and Rodrigues before becoming extratropical. Special thanks to Chicdat for helping write this newsletter's storm of the month!
Australia - the month began with Cyclone Ferdinand dissipating off northwest Australia. Several days later, a tropical low struck Western Australia, and Tropical Cyclone Gretel formed northeast of Queensland, later exiting into the South Pacific. There, the storm brushed New Caledonia with gusty winds and locally heavy rainfall. The month ended with another tropical low near Papua New Guinea.
More information can be found here. This list lists members who have joined/rejoined the WikiProject since the release of the last issue. Sorted chronologically.
To our new members: welcome to the project, and happy editing! Feel free to check the to-do list at the bottom right of the newsletter for things that you might want to work on. To our veteran members: thank you for your edits and your tireless contributions!
Featured Content
From March 17 to present, five featured articles were promoted:
Storms around the world, by Jason Rees
Over the last few months, the project has started to dip its toe into several other types of articles away from the traditional season, storm and timeline articles. These articles include lists on what tropical cyclones existed in which year, tropical cyclone by intensity and tropical cyclones affecting a certain territory, island nation etc. The hope is that these articles will be developed over the next few months to the point, where they get used by the international community.
We have had some early success with this goal with information from Category 5 South Pacific severe tropical cyclones being used by a Facebook page after Cyclone Harold. However, we need help developing these articles since there are approximately 150 countries impacted by tropical cyclones and there are approximately 15 tropical cyclones off all intensities per basin per year. You can help by finding resources for us to use, going through IBTRACS and the various databases published by the warning centres or even helping to expand the various articles.
As a reader: I first became interested in hurricanes when the buzz on Hurricane Dorian making landfall in the Bahamas came out at the end of August 2019. I was interested to know more about Dorian, but not too much. I went onto the solution page: 2019 Atlantic hurricane season, one of the first pages I saw on Wikipedia (that's where I got my signature, 🐔ChicdatChickenDatabase, the Chicken links to 2019 AHS). As hurricane season continued, I "experienced" every single storm from Dorian to Sebastien. After hurricane season in the Atlantic ended, I turned my eyes to the Southern Hemisphere. By the beginning of 2020, I was even delving into FAs, GAs, and stubs. As an IP: By late January 2020, I began questioning sharing my knowledge with the rest of Wikipedia, and on February 3, me my IP made what I believe was my first Wikipedia edit as an IP. However, many users were following the "All IPs are vandals, so let's revert their edits!" rule (e.g. here). Any coincidence that just 5 hours later...? As Chicdat: Five hours after I was given a violation of the WP:IPs are humans too rule, I decided to create an account. I like chickens, and I had a database that I used for their egg production, which I call CHICDAT (Chicken Database), so I chose the username Chicdat. Not long after that, I made my first edit as Chicdat. On March 18, I created my first article, List of Alabama hurricanes. On February 24, I became an autoconfirmed user, and on March 19, I became extended confirmed. In late March, I created my first userspace draft, User:Chicdat/Cyclone Herold.
In other words, that is how I became a Wikipedia user! 🐔ChicdatChickenDatabase
Current assessment table
Assessments valid as of this printing. Depending on when you may be viewing this newsletter, the table may be outdated. See here for the latest, most up to date statistics. As of this issue, there are 157 featured articles and 70 featured lists. There are 135 A-class articles, and 996 good articles. There are only 65 B-class articles, perhaps because because most articles of that quality already passed a GA review. There are 369 C-class articles, 736 start-class articles, and 151 stub-class articles, with 31 lists, and 8 current articles. These figures mean that slightly more than half of the project is rated a GA or better.
Storm of the month and other tropical activity for April
Cyclone Harold was a Category 5 storm on both the Saffir-Simpson and the Australian scale. The storm formed near the Solomon Islands on April 1, where high waves drowned 27 people on the MV Taimareho ferry. Near peak intensity, Harold struck the South Pacific island nation of Vanuatu, causing widespread damage and disruptions amid the ongoing pandemic, as well as two deaths. Harold later passed south of the main island of Fiji, resulting in power outages and one fatality. The storm subsequently passed just south of Tonga, causing power outages and high tides. Special thanks to Hurricaneboy23, Jason Rees, and TheAustinMan for helping write 94% of this newsletter's storm of the month!
Eastern Pacific - Tropical Depression One-E formed on April 25 southwest of Mexico, becoming the earliest tropical cyclone in the basin (east of 140°W and north of the equator). The depression dissipated a day after formation.
South-west Indian - toward the beginning of April, Cyclone Irondro formed southwest of Diego Garcia and moved to the southeast, becoming an intense tropical cyclone before weakening and becoming extratropical near the boundary with the Australian basin. In the middle of the month, Tropical Storm Jeruto originated in the Australian basin and took a southwest trajectory over open waters, dissipating on April 16.
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2020-05-01T17:44:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiCup_2020_May_newsletter-2020-05-01T17:44:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2020-05-01T17:44:00.000Z-WikiCup_2020_May_newsletter"],"text":"WikiCup 2020 May newsletter","linkableTitle":"WikiCup 2020 May newsletter"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2020-05-01T17:44:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiCup_2020_May_newsletter-2020-05-01T17:44:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2020-05-01T17:44:00.000Z-WikiCup_2020_May_newsletter"],"text":"WikiCup 2020 May newsletter","linkableTitle":"WikiCup 2020 May newsletter"}-->
The second round of the 2020 WikiCup has now finished. It was a high-scoring round and contestants needed 75 points to advance to round 3. There were some very impressive efforts in round 2, with the top ten contestants all scoring more than 500 points. A large number of the points came from the 12 featured articles and the 186 good articles achieved in total by contestants, and the 355 good article reviews they performed; the GAN backlog drive and the stay-at-home imperative during the COVID-19 pandemic may have been partially responsible for these impressive figures.
Our top scorers in round 2 were:
Epicgenius, with 2333 points from one featured article, forty-five good articles, fourteen DYKs and plenty of bonus points
Gog the Mild, with 1784 points from three featured articles, eight good articles, a substantial number of featured article and good article reviews and lots of bonus points
The Rambling Man, with 1262 points from two featured articles, eight good articles and a hundred good article reviews
Harrias, with 1141 points from two featured articles, three featured lists, ten good articles, nine DYKs and a substantial number of featured article and good article reviews
The rules for featured article reviews have been adjusted; reviews may cover three aspects of the article, content, images and sources, and contestants may receive points for each of these three types of review. Please also remember the requirement to mention the WikiCup when undertaking an FAR for which you intend to claim points. Remember also that DYKs cannot be claimed until they have appeared on the main page. As we enter the third round, any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed now, and anything you forgot to claim in round 2 cannot! Remember too, that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth. - MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:44, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2020-05-01T17:44:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2020-05-01T17:44:00.000Z-WikiCup_2020_May_newsletter","replies":[]}}-->
Best wishes, CAPTAIN RAJU(T)18:49, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2020-06-20T18:49:00.000Z","author":"CAPTAIN RAJU","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-CAPTAIN_RAJU-2020-06-20T18:49:00.000Z-Happy_Birthday!","replies":[]}}-->
The Hurricane Herald: Special Hurricane Season/New SHEM Cyclone Year Edition!
The Hurricane Herald is the semi-regular newsletter of WikiProject Tropical Cyclones. The newsletter aims to provide in summary the recent activities and developments of the WikiProject, in addition to global tropical cyclone activity. The Hurricane Herald has been running since its first edition ran on June 4, 2006. If you wish to receive or discontinue subscription to this newsletter, please visit the mailing list. This issue of The Hurricane Herald covers all project related events from May 1–July 1, 2020. This edition's editors and authors are Chicdat and Hurricanehink.
Please visit this page and bookmark any suggestions of interest to you. This will help improve the newsletter and other cyclone-related articles. Past editions can be viewed here.
WPTC 15th Anniversary push: some goals for the 15th year of WPTC (October 5, 2020!) include the creation or improvement of many other articles listed in the first section on the WPTC talk page.
Project Goals & Progress
The following is the current progress on the three milestone goals set by the WikiProject as of this publishing. They can be found, updated, at the main WikiProject page.
Hurricane Noah recently announced an initiative to get a featured topic for the year of 2018 with complete subtopics. The Eastern Pacific portion is very close to achieving a featured topic, and the Atlantic and North Indian Ocean are around a B-class average. The Western Pacific, Southern Hemisphere, and the global article for 2018 need your help! A lot of work is needed to get those three items up to par. For more information on which articles need specifically, please check out the project talk page. Getting a featured topic for an entire year would be an impressive feat for our project.
I want to invite you all to sing Auld Lang Syne with me and open up the egg nog with me as today July 1, 2020, marks the formal start of the 2020-21 tropical cyclone year, as well as the start of the season in the South-West Indian Ocean. As a result, it is a good chance to look back at the previous TC year and look forward to the season starting on November 1. As things stand, it appears that the status of the El Nino Southern Oscillation will either be La Nina or neutral conditions leaning towards La Nina. As a result, I would expect more activity to occur within the Coral Sea, near Queensland rather than out towards French Polynesia. On a social basis, the biggest question this year will be how will the island nations deal will Covid 19 and a major tropical cyclone - assuming it's still around in November. We got an early taster of how Vanuatu, Fiji and Tonga will deal with it thanks Severe Tropical Cyclone Harold.
Atlantic - Tropical Storm Arthur started the 2020 Atlantic hurricane season early for the sixth year in a row. It affected North Carolina before turning extratropical on May 19. Tropical Storm Bertha formed, made landfall in South Carolina, and dissipated — all on May 27. Bertha killed one person and left US$200 million in damage.
Eastern Pacific - Tropical Storm Amanda struck Guatemala in late May. Its heavy rainfall killed 33 people and caused US$200 million in damage. Amanda later reformed in the Bay of Campeche as Cristobal.
Western Pacific - Typhoon Vongfong devastated the Phillipines and made the 2020 Pacific typhoon season have the sixth-latest start on record in the basin. The typhoon killed 5 people.
North Indian Ocean - In addition to Amphan, a depression formed and dissipated near the coast of Oman, producing heavy rainfall that killed three people.
More information can be found here. This list lists members who have joined/rejoined the WikiProject since the release of the last issue. Sorted chronologically.
To our new members: welcome to the project, and happy editing! Feel free to check the to-do list at the bottom right of the newsletter for things that you might want to work on. To our veteran members: thank you for your edits and your tireless contributions!
Featured Content
From May 1 to present, two featured articles were promoted:
When a new storm undergoes rapid intensification and makes landfall, the members of WikiProject Tropical Cyclones try hard to create an article for it. Suddenly, the storm goes back out to sea again and makes landfall somewhere different. In one 20-kilobyte edit, Hurricaneboy23, let's say, adds in more information about this landfall, but not before the storm undergoes a cyclonic loop and makes a third landfall. As the article gets huge and bloated, it's split.
The story above is fictional, but things like it happen often, like in Cyclone Amphan's revision history. For Wikipedia to have an accurate coverage of tropical cyclones, there need to be enough members to put the new information — boosted by reliable sources, of course — into the article. So, if you haven't already, go to WP:WPTC/MEMBER and add your name! 🐔ChicdatChickenDatabase
Burnout - an opinion piece by ♫ Hurricanehink (talk)
I've been editing Wikipedia for a while. I've retired a few times, thinking I would be done for good, but something kept drawing me back. It might be the thrill to be the first one to post an advisory, or if you found a damage total that wasn't in the article, or the thrill of publishing an article and making it the best source of information on a given storm. Those are all great reasons to edit and to continue editing. But while the text we write is just computer code, we all are humans, subjected to outside stresses and the dreaded real life (RL).
When you edit for too long, you might find that you can't finish that list of projects you wanted to work on. It is better to take a break from what you were working on, and try something different (maybe not even weather-related) so that editing becomes enjoyable again. There's no sense getting burned out and stressed. The work will eventually get done on Wikipedia. Some projects are in much worse shape, but improving slowly but surely. The WPTC has a leg up on other projects because we have such a passionate group of editors and writers. It's better for the long run to take a break, focus on RL, get some sun, have a laugh, and do whatever you can to stay sane these days.
Current assessment table
Assessments valid as of this printing. Depending on when you may be viewing this newsletter, the table may be outdated. See here for the latest, most up to date statistics. As of this issue, there are 157 featured articles and 70 featured lists. There are 135 A-class articles, and 1,002 good articles. There are only 65 B-class articles, perhaps because because most articles of that quality already passed a GA review. There are 369 C-class articles, 736 start-class articles, and 151 stub-class articles, with 31 lists, and 8 current articles. These figures mean that slightly more than half of the project is rated a GA or better. Typhoon Warren was the 1000th GA in the project.
Storm of the month and other tropical activity for June
Tropical Storm Cristobal formed on June 1 in the Bay of Campeche from the remnants of Amanda in the eastern Pacific. Cristobal looped over the Yucatán peninsula before progressing northward, striking Louisiana on June 7, marking the second-earliest landfall on record in the state. The system moved through the central United States, eventually becoming extratropical over Wisconsin. Cristobal killed four people and left US$343 million in damage.
Atlantic - in addition to Cristobal, Tropical Storm Dolly formed in late June off the east coast of the United States. Originating as a subtropical depression, Dolly transitioned into a tropical cyclone over the Gulf Stream, and became extratropical on June 24.
Eastern Pacific - there were two short-lived tropical cyclones in the basin in late June. Tropical Storm Boris formed on June 24 and was a minimal tropical storm, and Tropical Depression Four-E formed at the end of the month off of Baja California.
Western Pacific - one tropical storm - Nuri - formed in the South China Sea, and killed one person when it struck southern China.
North Indian Ocean - Cyclone Nisarga formed on June 1 off India's western coast. The storm intensified into a severe cyclonic storm before it made landfall south of Mumbai. The cyclone killed 6 people and caused US$665 million in damage.
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2020-07-02T12:33:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiCup_2020_July_newsletter-2020-07-02T12:33:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2020-07-02T12:33:00.000Z-WikiCup_2020_July_newsletter"],"text":"WikiCup 2020 July newsletter","linkableTitle":"WikiCup 2020 July newsletter"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2020-07-02T12:33:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiCup_2020_July_newsletter-2020-07-02T12:33:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2020-07-02T12:33:00.000Z-WikiCup_2020_July_newsletter"],"text":"WikiCup 2020 July newsletter","linkableTitle":"WikiCup 2020 July newsletter"}-->
The third round of the 2020 WikiCup has now come to an end. The 16 users who made it into the fourth round each had at least 353 points (compared to 68 in 2019). It was a highly competitive round, and a number of contestants were eliminated who would have moved on in earlier years. Our top scorers in round 3 were:
Epicgenius, with one featured article, 28 good articles and 17 DYKs, amassing 1836 points
The Rambling Man , with 1672 points gained from four featured articles and seventeen good articles, plus reviews of a large number of FACs and GAs
Gog the Mild, a first time contestant, with 1540 points, a tally built largely on 4 featured articles and related bonus points.
Between them, contestants managed 14 featured articles, 9 featured lists, 3 featured pictures, 152 good articles, 136 DYK entries, 55 ITN entries, 65 featured article candidate reviews and 221 good article reviews. Additionally, MPJ-DK added 3 items to featured topics and 44 to good topics. Over the course of the competition, contestants have completed 710 good article reviews, in comparison to 387 good articles submitted for review and promoted. These large numbers are probably linked to a GAN backlog drive in April and May, and the changed patterns of editing during the COVID-19 pandemic. As we enter the fourth round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met. Please also remember that all submissions must meet core Wikipedia policies, regardless of the review process.
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk), Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:33, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2020-07-02T12:33:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2020-07-02T12:33:00.000Z-WikiCup_2020_July_newsletter","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Janm_7-2020-08-20T14:14:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Your_work_best-2020-08-20T14:14:00.000Z","replies":["c-Janm_7-2020-08-20T14:14:00.000Z-Your_work_best"],"text":"Your work best","linkableTitle":"Your work best"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Janm_7-2020-08-20T14:14:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Your_work_best-2020-08-20T14:14:00.000Z","replies":["c-Janm_7-2020-08-20T14:14:00.000Z-Your_work_best"],"text":"Your work best","linkableTitle":"Your work best"}-->
Your work best Janm 7 (talk) 14:14, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2020-08-20T14:14:00.000Z","author":"Janm 7","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Janm_7-2020-08-20T14:14:00.000Z-Your_work_best","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2020-09-01T19:52:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiCup_2020_September_newsletter-2020-09-01T19:52:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2020-09-01T19:52:00.000Z-WikiCup_2020_September_newsletter"],"text":"WikiCup 2020 September newsletter","linkableTitle":"WikiCup 2020 September newsletter"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2020-09-01T19:52:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiCup_2020_September_newsletter-2020-09-01T19:52:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2020-09-01T19:52:00.000Z-WikiCup_2020_September_newsletter"],"text":"WikiCup 2020 September newsletter","linkableTitle":"WikiCup 2020 September newsletter"}-->
The fourth round of the competition has finished, with 865 points being required to qualify for the final round, nearly twice as many points as last year. It was a hotly competitive round with two contestants with 598 and 605 points being eliminated, and all but two of the contestants who reached the final round having achieved an FA during the round. The highest scorers were
Bloom6132, with 1478 points gained mainly from 5 featured lists, 12 DYKs and 63 in the news items;
HaEr48 with 1318 points gained mainly from 2 featured articles, 5 good articles and 8 DYKs;
Lee Vilenski with 1201 points mainly gained from 2 featured articles and 10 good articles.
Between them, contestants achieved 14 featured articles, 14 featured lists, 2 featured pictures, 87 good articles, 90 DYK entries, 75 ITN entries, 95 featured article candidate reviews and 81 good article reviews. Congratulations to all who participated! It was a generally high-scoring and productive round and I think we can expect a highly competitive finish to the competition.
Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk), Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:52, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2020-09-01T19:52:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2020-09-01T19:52:00.000Z-WikiCup_2020_September_newsletter","replies":[]}}-->
The Hurricane Herald is the semi-regular newsletter of WikiProject Tropical Cyclones. The newsletter aims to provide in summary the recent activities and developments of the WikiProject, in addition to global tropical cyclone activity. The Hurricane Herald has been running since its first edition ran on June 4, 2006. If you wish to receive or discontinue subscription to this newsletter, please visit the mailing list. This issue of The Hurricane Herald covers all project related events from July 1–August 31, 2020. This edition's editors and authors are (alphabetically) Chicdat, Destroyeraa, Hurricanehink, Jason Rees, KN2731, Typhoon2013, & Weatherman27.
Please visit this page and bookmark any suggestions of interest to you. This will help improve the newsletter and other cyclone-related articles. Past editions can be viewed here.
As we rapidly approach the 15th anniversary of the project in October, it has been proposed that the Climate, Tropical cyclone, Severe Weather, and Non-tropical storms (defunct) wikiprojects get merged into a single project: Wikipedia:WikiProject Weather. This brand new project would remove the overlap that exists between the projects. It provide us with a better opportunity to develop articles such as List of named storms A, B, C etc; Tornadoes in Fiji/New Zealand/Hawaii/etc; Floods in 2018, 2019, 2020, etc; Floods in Bangladesh/United States/Egypt, etc; Weather of 1997, 1998, 2020, etc; Weather in Tokelau/South Africa/France, etc; Hurricanes in the United States, Hurricanes in Mexico, Typhoons in China, etc. The discussion continues on WP:Meteorology. Any feedback would be appreciated.
There are now more than 1,000 distinct good articles in the project, as of June, when Tropical Storm Sanba (2018) passed its GAR. That doesn't include the articles rated A-class that also passed GA status. There are now 1,299 good or featured articles, which 47.1% of all articles in the project. 80 net more good articles are needed for half of the project to be good or featured.
There are more than 500 articles in the Western Pacific, as of July, when Yellow Evan (talk·contribs) created Tropical Storm Ofelia (1993) and Tropical Storm Percy (1993). The WPAC is the second basin to reach that milestone, after the Atlantic, which crossed that threshold in 2008. In fact, the WPAC is growing at a rate of 33 articles per year (since 2017), while the Atlantic is only growing at a rate of 13.6 articles per year (also since 2017). At that rate, the WPAC would surpass the Atlantic in number of articles in 15 years, when both basins would have about 1,000 articles. The EPAC would only have about 450 articles by that point. At the current rate, the entire WPTC would have 4,632 articles. For reference, there are 2727 articles in the WPTC at the moment, 2,185 of which are a storm/season/timeline article.
There is a discussion to merge the nearly 600 disambiguation/set index article into naming lists by letter, such as List of named storms (I), instead of Tropical Storm Ingrid. This would make sure that the pages are centralized, which would make updating and navigation easier.
WPTC 15th Anniversary push: some goals for the 15th year of WPTC (October 5, 2020!) include the creation or improvement of many other articles listed in the first section on the WPTC talk page.
2018 Featured Topic
Hurricane Noah recently announced an initiative to get a featured topic for the year of 2018 with complete subtopics. The Eastern Pacific portion is very close to achieving a featured topic, and the Atlantic and North Indian Ocean are around a B-class average. The Western Pacific, Southern Hemisphere, and the global article for 2018 need your help! A lot of work is needed to get those three items up to par. For more information on which articles need specifically, please check out the project talk page. Getting a featured topic for an entire year would be an impressive feat for our project.
Storm of the month and other tropical activity for July
Hurricane Isaias caused widespread flooding and wind damage to the East Coast of the United States, spawning a destructive tornado outbreak and killing at least 18 people. Forming from a tropical wave near the Lesser Antilles on July 30, Isaias crossed Puerto Rico, Hispaniola, and parts of the Bahamas, before making its final landfall in Ocean Isle Beach, North Carolina. The storm proceeded up the East Coast, spawning 37 tornadoes and causing more than 3 million power outages, with more than half of them in New Jersey. Overall, Isaias caused a total of $4.2 billion in damage and 18 fatalities.
Atlantic - there were five named storms in the North Atlantic in July, tying the record set by 2005. In addition to Isaias, the first storm of the month was Tropical Storm Edouard, which formed near Bermuda and moved quickly across the north Atlantic. A few days later, Tropical Storm Fay became the first storm to hit New Jersey since 2011. Fay caused 6 fatalities and $400 million in damage. Short-lived Tropical Storm Gonzalo threatened the southern Lesser Antilles, but it dissipated while crossing into the Caribbean Sea. Hurricane Hanna formed in the Gulf of Mexico and rapidly intensified as it made landfall in Padre Island, Texas. The storm caused $500 million in damage and 5 fatalities. There was also a short-lived tropical depression near Cabo Verde.
Eastern Pacific - Tropical Storm Cristina nearly reached hurricane intensity as it moved to the southwest of Mexico, affecting Socorro Island. After two short-lived tropical depressions, Hurricane Douglas became the basin's first hurricane on July 23, which was the fourth-latest on record. Douglas would go on to strengthen into the season's first major hurricane, briefly attaining Category 4 status before weakening as it passed north of Hawaii. Damage in Hawaii was minor.
Western Pacific - For the first time on record, there were no tropical storms or typhoons during the month of July in the western Pacific. There were two nondeveloping tropical depressions during the month, as well as two tropical depressions in late July that would reach peak intensity in August. Tropical Storm Sinlaku formed on July 31 and made landfall in Vietnam, causing significant flooding and killing 6 people. Typhoon Hagupit formed east of the Philippines and later made landfall in Wenzhou, China, killing 12 and causing more than ¥2.858 billion (US$411 million) in damage.
ChessEric first joined Wikipedia in April of this year, and has quickly become a prolific weather editor. In addition to his work on tornado and severe weather articles, ChessEric helped write the bulk of the Hurricane Laura article (the storm of the month), in addition to making sure the article stayed free of vandalism, with 224 edits to the article as of this newsletter. ChessEric was one of 190 editors who worked on the Laura article. We thank ChessEric for his edits, and hope we can build on more collaborations in the future between the severe and the tropical cyclone Wikiprojects.
New WikiProject Members since the last newsletter
More information can be found here. This list lists members who have joined/rejoined the WikiProject since the release of the last issue. Sorted chronologically.
To our new members: welcome to the project, and happy editing! Feel free to check the to-do list at the bottom right of the newsletter for things that you might want to work on. To our veteran members: thank you for your edits and your tireless contributions!
A few weeks ago, I created an article, Hurricane Isaias, as it threatened much of the East Coast. I've created several articles already, but Isaias is one that stood out to me. First of all, it affected me, my town and my state of New Jersey, along with millions of other people. Two months ago, I learned about Wikipedia's In The News section of the main page, which documents recent events that are in the news. I nominated Isaias' article on August 1 here, and the discussion was closed quickly after Isaias had weakened significantly after impacting the Bahamas. As Isaias made landfall in the Carolinas, spawned 36+ tornadoes and killed 18 people, I re-nominated Isaias [1], got rejected again, and I learned a few lessons that I want to share to other editors:
When posting
If you post something that isn't in the news or isn't notable at all, then it would be quickly closed without much discussion.
Don't feel upset when someone opposes your nomination. It is almost guaranteed that someone will oppose your nomination.
Keep improving the article. An article that is a stub won't likely be posted.
When posting about a person, make sure the article complies with BLP policies, and is adequately referenced and well-written.
I also learned a few lessons about which tropical cyclones to post. In July, someone nominated Hurricane Hanna (2020)here, and it was also rejected because it didn't meet the notability requirements. Also, keep in mind that damage estimates and death reports often come out several days after the storm, which makes passing the nomination for a storm like Isaias, a storm that caused $4.2 billion and 18 deaths, somewhat hard.
My opinions on when to nominate an article (this list mainly refers to tropical cyclone articles)
The storm should affect more than two countries. However, if the storm causes a lot of death and destruction in one country (such as Tropical Storm Imelda), see the requirements below
The storm should cause more than $1 billion in damage. However, if the storm causes less destruction and less death, see the requirements below
The storm should cause at least 10 or 20 deaths. Most ITN nominations about a disaster that have less than 10 deaths are usually rejected/closed.
The storm should break at least 1 notable record (such as the deadliest storm to hit a country in 20 years, or something like that).
There is currently a discussion on the WPTC project page about this topic.
Around six months ago, I joined Wikipedia after seeing many articles on tropical cyclones and their seasons. Being someone who has studied (and been through) multiple storms, I realized I could help make a difference, bring more attention to tropical cyclones and that Wikipedia was the perfect place to do that. Soon after, I came across the WikiProject Tropical cyclones page, and after seeing what they did, I decided to sign my name and join the project. I really enjoyed how they gave to-do lists of tropical cyclone pages that needed work among other things. One of the great things about this WikiProject is the warm welcome I received when I joined and I got to know some of the more veteran editors, and they really helped me get around on Wikipedia, such as helpful tips and great advice to make better edits. As I have become comfortable editing and helping other users, some things came to mind that I thought other new users should know when they join the WPTC:
If you are new and have questions, don't be afraid to ask someone. There are plenty of helpful editors who know what they are doing, and who would be happy to give some great tips to get you used to editing weather articles on Wikipedia.
Don't be afraid to start editing. You can edit tropical cyclone pages as much as you want, just make sure you use the proper sources and citations.
Be kind. It is simply the Golden Rule, if you use it, others will too.
If you see something wrong, do something! If you see vandalism or any strange edits, make sure you revert them.
Help improve. There are plenty of tropical cyclone articles that need improvement and we need all the help we can get.
If you have any ideas but you're not sure if they would be right for an article, you can discuss them with fellow users on a talk page.
I am sure I missed some tips, but these are important for getting started with WPTC. This WikiProject has some amazing people and articles and I am sure new users (and veteran users as well) enjoy this as much as I do and will continue to make great edits as well as informative articles.
Current assessment table
Assessments valid as of this printing. Depending on when you may be viewing this newsletter, the table may be outdated. See here for the latest, most up to date statistics. As of this issue, there are 157 featured articles and 70 featured lists. There are 135 A-class articles, and 1,002 good articles. There are only 65 B-class articles, perhaps because because most articles of that quality already passed a GA review. There are 369 C-class articles, 736 start-class articles, and 151 stub-class articles, with 31 lists, and 8 current articles. These figures mean that slightly more than half of the project is rated a GA or better. Typhoon Warren was the 1000th GA in the project.
Storm of the month and other tropical activity for August
Hurricane Laura tied the 1856 Last Island hurricane as the strongest hurricane ever recorded to make landfall in the U.S state of Louisiana, as measured by maximum sustained winds. It moved across the Lesser and Greater Antilles as a tropical storm, killing 35 people on the island of Hispaniola due to flooding and landslides. Laura rapidly intensified once it reached the Gulf of Mexico, becoming a powerful Category 4 hurricane on August 26 with peak winds of 150 mph (240 km/h) early the next day. On August 27, Laura made landfall near Cameron, Louisiana at peak intensity, producing wind gusts of 137 mph (220 km/h) in Lake Charles, and leaving at least $8 billion in damage. Overall, Laura killed more than 57 people, with more missing.
Atlantic - the basin continued its record pace of activity. In the middle of the month, Tropical Storm Josephine formed east of the Lesser Antilles and eventually dissipated north of the islands. Tropical Storm Kyle originated off the east coast of the United States and moved to the east-northeast. Hurricane Marco formed in the Caribbean and briefly strengthened into a minimal hurricane in the Gulf of Mexico. For a few days, the NHC forecast back-to-back hurricane landfalls from Marco and Laura within two days of each other; however, Marco dissipated near the Louisiana coastline without causing significant damage. Toward the end of the month, Tropical Depression Fifteen formed off the southeastern United States.
Eastern Pacific - Hurricane Elida was the season's second hurricane, which brushed the Baja California Peninsula while moving northwestward. In the middle of the month, a series of storms formed, including a long-lived tropical depression, Tropical Storm Fausto, and Hurricane Genevieve, the last of which passed near the Baja California Peninsula. Genevieve killed two people, and its moisture spread into the southwestern United States. Toward the end of the month, Tropical Storm Hernan caused flooding and landslides in southwestern Mexico, and Iselle formed around the same time farther west over open water.
Western Pacific - after a quiet July, the basin became more active in August. Tropical Storm Jangmi brushed western Japan and South Korea with heavy rainfall. A short-lived tropical depression existed south of Japan. Severe Tropical Storm Mekkhala formed in the South China Sea and struck Guangdong, resulting in heavy rainfall and $154 million in damage. About a week later, Severe Tropical Storm Higos struck the same region, leaving eight deaths. Typhoon Bavi formed east of Taiwan and moved northward through the Yellow Sea, eventually striking North Korea, where it caused one fatality. Toward the end of the month, Typhoon Maysak formed east of Taiwan and followed a similar path to Bavi, becoming a powerful typhoon as it moved through the Ryukyu Islands. Another tropical depression formed between the Marianas Islands and Japan on August 31.
Project Goals & Progress
The following is the current progress on the three milestone goals set by the WikiProject as of this publishing. They can be found, updated, at the main WikiProject page.
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-CAPTAIN_RAJU-2020-09-14T19:35:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Happy_First_Edit_Day!-2020-09-14T19:35:00.000Z","replies":["c-CAPTAIN_RAJU-2020-09-14T19:35:00.000Z-Happy_First_Edit_Day!"],"text":"Happy First Edit Day!","linkableTitle":"Happy First Edit Day!"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-CAPTAIN_RAJU-2020-09-14T19:35:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Happy_First_Edit_Day!-2020-09-14T19:35:00.000Z","replies":["c-CAPTAIN_RAJU-2020-09-14T19:35:00.000Z-Happy_First_Edit_Day!"],"text":"Happy First Edit Day!","linkableTitle":"Happy First Edit Day!"}-->
Happy First Edit Day!
Have a very happy first edit anniversary!
From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU(T)19:35, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2020-09-14T19:35:00.000Z","author":"CAPTAIN RAJU","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-CAPTAIN_RAJU-2020-09-14T19:35:00.000Z-Happy_First_Edit_Day!","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2020-11-03T11:37:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiCup_2020_November_newsletter-2020-11-03T11:37:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2020-11-03T11:37:00.000Z-WikiCup_2020_November_newsletter"],"text":"WikiCup 2020 November newsletter","linkableTitle":"WikiCup 2020 November newsletter"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2020-11-03T11:37:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiCup_2020_November_newsletter-2020-11-03T11:37:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2020-11-03T11:37:00.000Z-WikiCup_2020_November_newsletter"],"text":"WikiCup 2020 November newsletter","linkableTitle":"WikiCup 2020 November newsletter"}-->
The 2020 WikiCup has come to an end, with the final round going down to the wire. Our new Champion is Lee Vilenski (submissions), the runner-up last year, who was closely followed by Gog the Mild (submissions). In the final round, Lee achieved 4 FAs and 30 GAs, mostly on cue sport topics, while Gog achieved 3 FAs and 15 GAs, mostly on important battles and wars, which earned him a high number of bonus points. The Rambling Man (submissions) was in third place with 4 FAs and 8 GAs on football topics, with Epicgenius (submissions) close behind with 19 GAs and 16 DYK's, his interest being the buildings of New York.
The other finalists were Hog Farm (submissions), HaEr48 (submissions), Harrias (submissions) and Bloom6132 (submissions). The final round was very productive, and besides 15 FAs, contestants achieved 75 FAC reviews, 88 GAs and 108 GAN reviews. Altogether, Wikipedia has benefited greatly from the activities of WikiCup competitors all through the contest. Well done everyone!
All those who reached the final will receive awards and the following special awards will be made, based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, these prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round, or in the event of a tie, to the overall leader in this field.
Gog the Mild (submissions) wins the featured article prize, for a total of 14 FAs during the course of the competition.
Lee Vilenski (submissions) wins the featured article reviewer prize, for 23 FAC reviews in round 5.
Epicgenius (submissions) wins the good article prize, for 45 GAs in round 2 and 113 overall.
MPJ-DK (submissions) wins the topic prize, for 33 articles in good topics in round 2.
The Rambling Man (submissions) wins the good article reviewer prize, for 100 good article reviews in round 2.
Epicgenius (submissions) wins the DYK prize, for 22 Did you know articles in round 4 and 94 overall.
Bloom6132 (submissions) wins the ITN prize, for 63 In the news articles in round 4 and 136 overall.
Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2021 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66, Vanamonde and CwmhiraethMediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:37, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2020-11-03T11:37:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2020-11-03T11:37:00.000Z-WikiCup_2020_November_newsletter","replies":[]}}-->
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2020-11-24T01:43:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2020-11-24T01:43:00.000Z-ArbCom_2020_Elections_voter_message","replies":[]}}-->
The Hurricane Herald is the semi-regular newsletter of WikiProject Tropical Cyclones. The newsletter aims to provide in summary the recent activities and developments of the WikiProject, in addition to global tropical cyclone activity. The Hurricane Herald has been running since its first edition ran on June 4, 2006. If you wish to receive or discontinue subscription to this newsletter, please visit the mailing list. This issue of The Hurricane Herald covers all project related events from October 5–November 30, 2020. This edition's editors and authors are SMB99thx, Weatherman27, Chicdat, Hurricanehink, Cyclone Toby, Typhoon2013, and ChessEric.
Please visit this page and bookmark any suggestions of interest to you. This will help improve the newsletter and other cyclone-related articles. Past editions can be viewed here.
From the Main Page documents WikiProject related materials that have appeared on the main page from October 5–November 30, 2020 in chronological order.
20th Anniversary push: some goals for the 20th year of Wikipedia (January 15, 2021!) include the creation or improvement of many other articles listed in the first section on the WPTC talk page.
Current assessment table
Assessments valid as of this printing. Depending on when you may be viewing this newsletter, the table may be outdated. See here for the latest, most up to date statistics. As of this issue, there are 164 featured articles and 70 featured lists. There are 133 A-class articles, and 1,010 good articles. There are only 71 B-class articles, perhaps because because most articles of that quality already passed a GA review. There are 415 C-class articles, 788 start-class articles, and 182 stub-class articles, with 23 lists, and 9 current articles. These figures mean that slightly more than half of the project is rated a GA or better. Typhoon Warren was the 1000th GA in the project.
The following is the current progress on the three milestone goals set by the WikiProject as of this publishing. They can be found, updated, at the main WikiProject page.
Storms of the month and other tropical activity for October and November
SotM for October: Typhoon Goni / Rolly
Typhoon Goni formed from east of The Philippines towards the end of October, just as Typhoon Molave ravaged the country. Taking in the plentiful favorable conditions, Goni, known as Rolly in The Philippines, explosively intensified into a Category-5 equivalent hurricane just three days after it became a tropical depression. An eyewall replacement cycle managed to curb its intensification. Goni finished the cycle a few hours before it made landfall, and explosively intensified again into winds of 195 mph (JTWC) and a pressure of 884 mbar. This allowed it to tie with typhoons Haiyan and Meranti as the strongest typhoon by wind speed. Goni made landfall at peak intensity, killing 25 people and causing US$368 million in damage.
SotM for November: Hurricane Iota
Hurricane Iota developed in the central Caribbean Sea in mid-November. Like Goni, it explosively intensified, strengthening 120 mph in 48 hours, and deepening 81 mbar in the same amount of time. Iota explosively strengthened late on November 15 and early on November 16, becoming a Category 5 hurricane at 15:00 UTC on the 16th. By the time Iota had achieved C5 intensity, three people were already dead in Colombia due to landslides. As the storm made landfall, and subsequently weakened and dissipated, adding to the destruction from Hurricane Eta. Iota killed at least 61 people.
Atlantic - Gamma, Delta, Epsilon, Zeta, Eta, Theta, Iota.
The active Atlantic hurricane season continued. In early October, Tropical Storm Gamma dissipated over the northern Yucatan and was absorbed by powerful Hurricane Delta, which was the season's third major hurricane. Delta weakened before hitting Quintana Roo, but restrengthened in the Gulf of Mexico, later hitting Louisiana as a low-end Category 2 hurricane in nearly the same location as Hurricane Laura in August. Delta killed six people and left US$4 billion in damage. A few days later, Hurricane Epsilon developed southeast of Bermuda, becoming a major hurricane and brushing the island to the east. Hurricane Zeta followed a similar path as Delta, striking Quintana Roo and later striking southeastern Louisiana as a Category 2 hurricane; it killed 8 people and left U$3 billion in damage. At the end of the month, Hurricane Eta developed, becoming a strong Category 4 hurricane before striking Nicaragua. After killing hundreds of people in Central America, Eta reformed in the northwestern Caribbean. It made another landfall in Cuba, moved over the Florida Keys, and briefly became a hurricane again in the eastern Gulf of Mexico, before weakening and striking Cedar Key, Florida as a tropical storm. In early November, Tropical Storm Theta developed from a non-tropical low and moved across the eastern Atlantic.
Eastern Pacific - Tropical Storm Norbert was the basin's only storm in October. It formed southwest of Mexico, though wind shear killed it off within a few days. Norbert then pulled a surprise on meteorologists: it regenerated into a tropical storm again on October 13, although it eventually dying again two days later. In early November, the season's next system, Tropical storm Odalys, formed, which remained weak off southwest Mexico. After an 11-day lull in activity, Tropical Storm Polo southwest of Mexico, which dissipated two days after its formation.
Western Pacific - In early October, Typhoon Chan-Hom passed south of Japan and turned to the southeast, dissipating after 12 days. A series of storms affected Vietnam, causing deadly floods that killed over 200 people. In short succession, tropical storms Linfa and Nangka struck the country. Typhoon Saudel moved across the Philippines and later struck Vietnam. Typhoon Molave crossed the central Philippines and later hit Vietnam, killing 71 people. After the powerful Typhoon Goni, Tropical Storm Atsani reached peak intensity southeast of Taiwan before dissipating. In early November, Tropical Storm Etau struck southeastern Vietnam, followed days later by Typhoon Vamco, which crossed the Philippines and hit central Vietnam.
2020 North Indian Ocean cyclone season - after a long hiatus, the season sprang to life with one deep depression and two tropical depressions in October. Deep Depression BOB 02 killed 98 people in Central India, and flooded the city of Hyderabad. The system redeveloped into a depression in the Arabian Sea. Later in the month, a depression struck West Bengal. In November, Cyclone Gati explosively intensified before hitting northeastern Somalia, becoming the strongest tropical cyclone on record there; Gati killed at least eight people after dropping more than a year's worth of rain. Later in the month, Cyclone Nivar struck southeastern India. As the month ended, another depression was developing east of Sri Lanka.
Robloxsupersuperhappyface joined Wikipedia in July of this year, and has become the most prolific tropical cyclone editor relating to current events, as well as playing an enormous role in creation of newly formed tropical cyclones that eventually became destructive in many regions they are affected in (Hurricane Sally to Gulf Coast of the United States, Typhoon Goni to the Philippines, and Hurricane Iota to Central America respectively - Also, both Goni and Iota are Storms of the Month!). Because of that reason, Robloxsupersuperhappyface's articles are the one of the most viewed tropical cyclone articles in this year - as well as helped us on inviting prospective tropical cyclone editors to this project as they edited Robloxsupersuperhappyface's articles, leading into why we have more than 100 members in this WikiProject leading to this issue. As the result of brilliant Robloxsupersuperhappyface's contributions, we want to give many, many thanks to Super for helping this WikiProject grow so much recently. Happy Thanksgiving!
New WikiProject Members since the last newsletter - project membership is over 100 now!
More information can be found here. This list lists members who have joined/rejoined the WikiProject since the release of the last issue. Sorted chronologically in order of which they joined.
To our new members: welcome to the project, and happy editing! Feel free to check the to-do list at the bottom right of the newsletter for things that you might want to work on. To our veteran members: thank you for your edits and your tireless contributions!
Let's talk about that - An opinion piece by Weatherman27
Before I start, I would like to link everyone to a new essay regarding Force Thirteen. Here it is: WP:F13. I recommend users (old and new) to read this to understand why we don't use Force Thirteen as a source, and why it isn't a reliable source. If you want to see what good reliable sources are, read this: WP:WPTC/AS Now, I will get to the main point of this opinion piece.
Recently, I have gotten more involved in talk pages, and sharing my ideas and/or my opinions on different issues or ideas that have come up, primarily on 2020 Atlantic hurricane season's talk page. As I have discussed these thoughts and ideas with other editors, I have noticed and experienced some things such as being personally attacked, which has led me to want to reiterated some key points here. Despite the fact that they are mentioned commonly at the top of talk pages, I want to bring these up as it is important to have a good base where people can properly chat and discuss topics in peace.
1. Treat others with respect This one can't be stressed enough. Especially on talk pages, it is a place where you and your peers communicate issues, opinions, or ideas to each-other. This means discussing topics in a kind and adult manner. There is nothing wrong with disagreeing in what somebody may say, but that does not mean that you have the right to put them down for not having similar views. It is simply the Golden Rule.
2. Assume Good faith Along with my first point, I feel this one needs to be brought up. People have different opinions, and that is all right, but just because you may not agree with it or what they say, does not mean that it was not out of good faith. They were most likely voicing what they think on the subject, and that is alright. This also goes for edits. Unless it is pretty obvious that a user as vandalized something, it is always good to assume good faith, as other people might not know the rules as well as a more experienced editor.
3. Avoid Personal attacks This is a very important subject that needs to be remembered not just on talk pages, but on all other parts of Wikipedia as well. On talk pages, discussions can get pretty tense and heated, and I admit that I have gotten into a few of these arguments as well. Despite this, it is never okay to attack someone. As a user who has gotten personally attacked before, I can definitely say that it does not feel good, and usually the person who made the attacked will get warned or blocked, so please be kind and accept what other people have to say, because you will get nowhere by being rude.
4. Come to a consensus (preferably a clear one) On talk pages, whenever there is a discussion regarding something important like the merging of an article, people need to decide what the outcome of something important on a talk page. For example, if there is say, a merge discussion for an article on a tropical cyclone, many people will give their input. Usually, different people will have different views on whether to merge or keep the article. Sometimes, the editor will close the discussion early, but this is usually for unrelated reasons, though it sometimes may be because the editor had a change of mind. Now, if there is support for say a merge of the article, then that will be the consensus and the discussion will be closed and the article merged. This can also happen on the opposite side, if an article is to be kept, the discussion will be closed and article kept. Simply put, it is important to discuss and come to a clear decision if there is a consensus involved, to avoid difficulty with the article or page in the future.
These are just a few examples of things that editors of the WPTC need to remember when using talk page discussions. There are plenty of other things not mentioned here that are just as important when it comes to using talk pages. I made this simply to help remind editors the key points when using the discussions, and I hope these were helpful to new users as well as veterans. We need to really get better at staying calm and keeping civil. I have noticed lots of hostility and arguing lately, as well as edit warring and disputes. We need to work this out. We are supposed to work together as WPTC editors, so please fix it. It is sad seeing so many editors getting reported or having to get blocked from this. Once again, keep discussions civil and have a good day. Signing off,
My experiences as a WikiProject Tropical cyclones member by SMB99thx
Hello again, people of the WikiProject Tropical cyclones! In here, I want to tell how my experiences with WikiProject Tropical Cyclones changed my views on WikiProjects, helped me out of trouble and to be able to regain the trust of many people in Wikipedia.
When I joined WikiProject Tropical cyclones, it was the second WikiProject I have ever joined. The first WikiProject I have ever joined is WikiProject COVID-19, and the reason why I joined that project is to gain trust of people when I contributed to COVID-19 articles and as well as my fight against an IP editor which turned out to be the LTA named Bedriczwaleta (and has been active much more longer than I thought, since February of last year (!!!!)). I have the same thought process (and combined with my plans of editing old season articles, which is not done yet) when I first joined this WikiProject, but joining the WikiProject Tropical cyclones turned out to be something different. It led me to know what are the purposes of WikiProjects are and in turn led me to join many other WikiProjects since.
As such, what made me change my views on WikiProjects during my time as a WikiProject Tropical Cyclones?
First of all, I have seen that WikiProject Tropical cyclones members always actively work together to advance project goals, actively participating in discussions and give much-needed advice on new WikiProject Tropical cyclones members (including me). Second, WPTC really cares about our articles (and the assessments) as part of their project goals. 2018 FT project and Meteorological history of Hurricane Dorian (Four Award!) is a prime example of this. Third, we are actively welcoming the new members of this WikiProject and giving these members opportunity to succeed with us by i.e. giving out WikiLove (barnstars). Fourth, we, like WP COVID-19, actively fight against vandals and other LTAs e.g. Sidow........., UnderArmorKid, and Iphonehurricane95.
These kinds of activity led me to change my belief on what WikiProjects truly are. You could see this kind of activity on other good WikiProjects like WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors, which I just joined recently on 26 October 2020 as of this newsletter and WikiProject Articles of Creation, which I have interest on joining but I might not be able to.
Now, why WikiProject Tropical cyclones brought me out of trouble (and Chicdat, for that matter)?
WikiProject Tropical cyclones is generally a content-creating WikiProject. We really care about improving tropical cyclone coverage on Wikipedia. Members of this WikiProject generally encouraged to communicate and discuss (in Wikipedia, in Discord, or in IRC channel), and this is what helped me and Chicdat out from trouble since our discussions from what I have seen is not always administrative.
Before I joined WikiProject Tropical cyclones (and when I was still new to WikiProject Tropical cyclones), I have been putting myself on trouble numerous times. I was an ANI regular, and as an ANI regular I detailed about my struggle to deal with the LTA Bedriczwaleta and I'm was also putting up IBAN proposals of User:Jadebenn and User:Moamem as well as User:U1Quattro and User:1292simon. While I have managed to get my proposal succeeded and finally got Bedriczwaleta back on track for a while (what I thought), in August 20 (as I was about to finalize my decision to enter my college I'm currently in right now) I got myself into serious trouble against IP range 185.66.252.0/23 (which is apparently good at programming - I'm not). I tried to get them blocked for PA (calling me a thief who has a black soul), but this is where when I realized that I had to attribute things I copied within Wikipedia and I had to apologize to the user. Since then, I did my best to attribute everything I had copied articles from (Example) and I also realized that ANI is not for me (as I do not want to get into troubles by just being there), which led me to quitting ANI until November of this year when I decided to involve myself on Miggy72 dispute (now banned for sockpuppetry - Miggy72 could have been invited to WPTC if he stopped on insisting to create non-notable topics).
After that incident with the IP range 185.66.252.0/23, I have stated that I do not want to get myself into trouble as a presence in ANI. As such, I decided to focus on what I want to do, which is to continue my project of splitting season articles of the yesteryear and began to increasingly involve myself within the project - to look for help and giving the best help that I can do for this WikiProject. The activity from that September led me to become Member of the Month in the previous edition of this newsletter. It was a comeback that I needed, and I want to thank WikiProject Tropical cyclones (especially Hurricanehink) for getting me on this situation. Without their help, I'm not sure if I could be here on this day.
Now, for the final question – why this WikiProject helped me (and Chicdat) regain trust of many people in Wikipedia?
As I stated before, this WikiProject encourages discussion within other members of this WikiProject, which in turn encourages close involvement in all sides of this WikiProject. Because of this, some people are actually helping us learning policies in Wikipedia as the time goes on, rather than falling in into blocks. As such, with time, I have seen that some admins are open for Chicdat to become a rollbacker, while I got hold on several automated gadgets that was more useful. It appears that these tools are the reason why these people are one of the more trusted people in Wikipedia, which in turn helped me a lot at gaining trust. Someday in the future, I'm looking to become an admin by myself. But that's for the another day. For now, what I'm currently doing now is to work at my craft to eventually prepare for the day when I will seek for adminship in the years ahead.
By the way, to me, both Binbin0111 and Miggy72 are young, but unfortunately they took on the wrong path (Binbin0111 was one of the earliest Force Thirteen insinuators - Binbin0111 is probably the impetus of Force Thirteen policy in this project (as it was made back in 2017), while Miggy72... we know what happened). I feel bad for them, especially Binbin0111. Had Binbin0111 is willing to learn and took steps forward to become productive young editor like Yellow Evan and two other resilient young editors I have mentioned did, Binbin0111 could have been one of the most valuable editors in this project, especially in matters related to Western Pacific basin, and in extension, Vietnam.
That's it. That's what I have to say. College is increasingly getting into my feelings right now, but I will do my best as I can coming into December. Sorry if I have a bad English. Thanks for reading this opinion piece!
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2021-01-01T11:10:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Welcome_to_the_2021_WikiCup!-2021-01-01T11:10:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2021-01-01T11:10:00.000Z-Welcome_to_the_2021_WikiCup!"],"text":"Welcome to the 2021 WikiCup!","linkableTitle":"Welcome to the 2021 WikiCup!"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2021-01-01T11:10:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Welcome_to_the_2021_WikiCup!-2021-01-01T11:10:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2021-01-01T11:10:00.000Z-Welcome_to_the_2021_WikiCup!"],"text":"Welcome to the 2021 WikiCup!","linkableTitle":"Welcome to the 2021 WikiCup!"}-->
Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The competition begins today and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page. Any questions on the rules or on anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. We thank Vanamonde93 and Godot13, who have retired as judges, and we thank them for their past dedication. The judges for the WikiCup this year are Sturmvogel 66 (talk·contribs·email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk·contribs·email). Good luck! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:10, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2021-01-01T11:10:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2021-01-01T11:10:00.000Z-Welcome_to_the_2021_WikiCup!","replies":[]}}-->
The Hurricane Herald is the semi-regular newsletter of WikiProject Tropical Cyclones. The newsletter aims to provide in summary the recent activities and developments of the WikiProject, in addition to global tropical cyclone activity. The Hurricane Herald has been running since its first edition ran on June 4, 2006. If you wish to receive or discontinue subscription to this newsletter, please visit the mailing list. This issue of The Hurricane Herald covers all project related events from December 1, 2020–January 15, 2021. This edition's editors and authors are MarioJump83, Hurricanehink, Destroyeraa, Chicdat, Typhoon2013, CycloneFootball71, Hurricane Noah, LightandDark2000, Cyclone Toby (editor's pick for member of the month), Skarmory, Shift674, and HurricaneCovid. Please visit this page and bookmark any suggestions of interest to you. This will help improve the newsletter and other cyclone-related articles. Past editions can be viewed here.
Typhoon Ike was also promoted from GA to A-class article.
Member of the month (Editor's Pick) – Cyclone Toby
Cyclone Toby first joined Wikipedia in July 2020 as I like hurricanes. Since then, they have become one of the most active editors, taking the initiative of fulfilling article requests, as well as helping us work on finishing many drafts we have. These articles include Hurricanes in Hispaniola, Hurricanes in Nicaragua, and Hurricanes in Honduras, as well as helping out getting Effects of Hurricane Dorian in the Carolinas (a long-standing draft that took many efforts to get it published to mainspace) nominated for GA, as of this writing. There are more articles Cyclone Toby is currently working on other than the ones previously listed. Also, Cyclone Toby is one of the kinder members of WPTC, actively welcoming many new editors that edited articles under WikiProject Tropical cyclones banner, as well as inviting some of these editors to the project, in which their influence ended up bringing more editors to WPTC without any invitation. We thank Cyclone Toby for work they have done in the past year, which was a horrible year for many of us, but Toby is one of many bright spots that helped us get through that year. As we enter the new year, we encourage Cyclone Toby to keep up their work and eventually complete these drafts, which will ultimately lead to the clearing of the backlog of drafts within the project.
Featured Content
From December 1, 2020 to January 15, 2021, there were no articles promoted to Featured Article status. From the Main Page: Documents WikiProject related materials that have appeared on the main page from December 1, 2020–January 15, 2021 in chronological order.
For the next steps of the 2018 Global FT project, we're likely to finish the 2018 Pacific hurricane season FT by the end of the year. Hurricane Bud (2018) is likely to become a Featured Article (FA) around the first anniversary of the 2018 Global FT task force, which will be in June 2021, while Hurricane Olivia (2018) is the most likely FAC next in line. Sooner or later (which might happen before Bud or Olivia is FA), Timeline of the 2018 Pacific hurricane season will be completed, and subsequently nominated for Good Article (GA) status. After that, 2018 Pacific hurricane season might be nominated for Featured Topic (FT) before the timeline or the article is nominated for FA, based on the likely order of completion provided by Hurricane Noah on December 22, 2020 with some changes due to priorities after that time.
In the Western Pacific, the creation of Effects of Typhoon Mangkhut in the Philippines is still being planned out, while Cimaron, Trami, Kong-rey, and Son-Tinh are in line to be nominated for GA later on - and Jebi may well become a FA by the next issue. In the North Indian Ocean, Cyclone Titli was recently created and likely to be expanded later on. In the Southern Hemisphere, Cyclone Owen is currently being worked on to become a GA someday, while Berguitta, Josie, Keni, and Liua are still under construction. For the Mediterranean, Cyclone Zorbas will be expanded upon and nominated for GA, some time after this issue.
We are recruiting
If you are interested in writing new articles, promoting articles to GA, or helping with the FAC review process for the Global 2018 FT project, please reach out to Hurricane Noah or any other member of the 2018 FT task force.
Assessments valid as of this printing. Depending on when you may be viewing this newsletter, the table may be outdated. See here for the latest, most up to date statistics. As of this issue, there are 164 featured articles and 70 featured lists. There are 133 A-class articles, and 1,010 good articles. There are only 71 B-class articles, perhaps because because most articles of that quality already passed a GA review. There are 415 C-class articles, 788 start-class articles, and 182 stub-class articles, with 23 lists, and 9 current articles. These figures mean that slightly more than half of the project is rated a GA or better. Typhoon Warren was the 1,000th GA in the project.
The following is the current progress on the three milestone goals set by the WikiProject as of this publishing. They can be found, updated, at the main WikiProject page.
Storm of the month and other tropical activity for December through January 15, 2021
Storm of the month for December – Cyclone Yasa
Yasa was a powerful and destructive tropical cyclone that struck the island nation of Fiji in December 2020. The second tropical tropical disturbance, and the first and strongest severe tropical cyclone of the season, Yasa originated from a low pressure area on December 10, to the north of Port Vila, in Vanuatu. The storm became a tropical disturbance on the next day and was given the designation 02F by the Fiji Meteorological Service (FMS). The system gradually strengthened over the next couple of days while moving southeastward, reaching tropical storm-equivalent status (Category 1 tropical cyclone on the Australian scale) and receiving the name Yasa on December 13. For the next 3 days, Yasa made a slow clockwise loop, during which time it underwent rapid intensification from December 14 to 16, bombing out from tropical storm-equivalent status to a Category 5-equivalent tropical cyclone on both the Saffir–Simpson Hurricane Wind Scale (SSHWS) and the Australian scale. On December 16, Yasa reached its peak intensity, with maximum 10-minute sustained winds of 250 km/h (155 mph), maximum 1-minute sustained winds of 260 km/h (160 mph), and a minimum central pressure of 899 millibars (26.5 inHg). This made Yasa the fourth-most intense tropical cyclone recorded in the South Pacific basin, as well as the second Category 5 severe tropical cyclone in 2020, after Cyclone Harold.
Afterward, Yasa underwent an eyewall replacement cycle as it neared Fiji, causing the storm to weaken. Early on December 17, Yasa made landfall on Bua Province on Vanua Levu, as a powerful Category 4-equivalent tropical cyclone on the SSHWS (Category 5 severe tropical cyclone on the Australian scale). Following landfall, Yasa quickly weakened, dropping back to tropical storm-equivalent status within two days. Afterward, Yasa moved in a southward direction while continuing its weakening trend, falling below tropical cyclone status on December 19, and dissipating on December 24. Yasa killed 4 people in Fiji and left another person missing. As of this writing, the damage estimates for Yasa are still being calculated, but Yasa had caused extensive damage on Vanua Levu, likely becoming the most destructive tropical cyclone to strike Fiji since Winston in 2016.
North Atlantic – This season, after being the most active on record for its basin, in terms of tropical cyclone formation, officially ended on November 30.
Eastern Pacific – This season, along with the Atlantic hurricane season, ended on November 30.
Western Pacific – Tropical Storm Krovanh (Vicky) developed over the Philippine Sea. The storm is the third tropical cyclone to receive the name Vicky in the year 2020. The storm made landfall on Palawan on December 19, and eventually moved into the South China Sea.
North Indian Ocean – Activity continued into December, with the strengthening of Cyclonic Storm Burevi in the Bay of Bengal. Burevi then made landfall in Sri Lanka a few days later.
South-West Indian Ocean – The third cyclone of the season, Tropical Storm Bongoyo, formed, gradually strengthening over open waters. Within a few weeks, the season began to ramp up, with the formation Tropical Storm Chalane, before it made landfall on Madagascar and in Mozambique. After a tropical depression left the basin, another system would form, becoming Tropical Storm Danilo. On January 14, another Zone of Disturbed Weather developed over the central south Indian Ocean, which became Tropical Depression 07 two days later.
Australian region – A tropical low formed, slowly developing, before gaining tropical-storm strength winds. Soon after, another tropical low formed, this making landfall along the Pilbara Coast of Australia with tropical storm-force winds. Within just a few days, yet another tropical low formed that made landfall along the Kimberly Coast. After a series of two more tropical lows, another system formed. This low would strengthen into Tropical Cyclone Imogen, before making landfall along the Queensland Coast. A seventh tropical low developed on January 5, before dissipating five days later. On January 13, an eighth tropical low, 07U, developed east-northeast of the Cocos Islands.
South Pacific – The first system of the season, 01F, formed on December 11. Within a few days, the season began to ramp up, with the development of Tropical cyclones Yasa and Zazu, with the former rapidly intensifying and becoming a powerful Category 5-equivalent cyclone. Yasa went on to make landfall on the island of Vanua Levu in Fiji on December 17, becoming the most powerful tropical cyclone to strike the island nation since Winston in 2016.
South Atlantic – On December 27, Subtropical Storm Oquira, the second storm of the season, formed in the South Atlantic, off the coast of Brazil. The system lasted for several days as a subtropical storm while moving away from Brazil, before transitioning into an extratropical low on December 31.
Eta was a powerful and long-lived hurricane that devastated Central America in November 2020. The twenty-ninth tropical depression, record-tying twenty-eighth named storm, twelfth hurricane, and fifth major hurricane of the extremely active 2020 Atlantic hurricane season, Eta originated from a vigorous tropical wave in the eastern Caribbean Sea on October 28. On October 30, the system organized into Tropical Depression Twenty-Nine, before becoming a tropical storm on the next day, at which time it was given the name Eta by the National Hurricane Center (NHC). On November 2, Eta became undergoing rapid intensification over the western Caribbean, as it progressed westward, with the cyclone ultimately becoming a Category 4 hurricane on November 3. Later that day, Eta reached its peak intensity, with 1-minute sustained winds of 150 mph (240 km/h) and a minimum central pressure of 922 mbar (hPa; 27.23 inHg), it was the third-most intense November Atlantic hurricane on record, behind the 1932 Cuba hurricane, and Hurricane Iota, which struck the same region just two weeks later. However, satellite data suggests that Eta may have reached Category 5 intensity at the time of its peak intensity, since reconnaissance aircraft failed to sample the hurricane's strongest winds at the time of its peak intensity. Despite this, in their post-storm report, the NHC maintained Eta as a powerful Category 4 hurricane. Six hours after reaching its peak, Eta underwent an eyewall replacement cycle, causing the storm to weaken somewhat. At 21:00 UTC on November 2, Eta made landfall south of Puerto Cabezas, Nicaragua, with maximum sustained winds of 140 mph (225 km/h) and a central pressure of 940 mbar (hPa; 27.76 inHg). Following landfall, Eta rapidly weakened to a tropical depression by 00:00 UTC on November 5.
Despite the mountainous terrain, Eta's low-level circulation survived, and Eta retained tropical depression status for another day, during its two-day trek across Central America, before degenerating into a remnant low overland later on November 5. On November 6, Eta's remnant low moved north over water and regenerated into a tropical depression, before turning towards the northeast. Afterward, Eta reorganized into a tropical storm over the Caribbean on November 7, as it accelerated toward Cuba. On the next day, Eta made landfall on Cuba's Sancti Spíritus Province as a tropical storm, before quickly emerging into the Atlantic and turning westward. Over the next five days, the system moved erratically, making a third landfall on Lower Matecumbe Key in the Florida Keys, on November 9, before slowing down and making a counterclockwise loop in the southern Gulf of Mexico, just off the coast of Cuba, with the storm's intensity fluctuating along the way. Afterward, Eta turned north-northeastward and briefly regained Category 1 hurricane strength on November 11, before weakening back into a tropical storm several hours later. On November 12, Eta made a fourth landfall over Cedar Key, Florida. Eta weakened after making landfall, before eventually re-emerging into the Atlantic later that day. Afterward, Eta became extratropical on November 13, before being absorbed into another frontal system off the coast of the Eastern United States on the next day. In all, Hurricane Eta killed at least 211 people, left 120 people missing, and caused at least $7.9 billion (2020 USD) in damages, with the vast majority of the deaths and damages occurring in Central America. Just two weeks later, Central America was struck by Hurricane Iota as a high-end Category 4 hurricane, making landfall near the same location as Eta, which further exacerbated the disaster in the region.
Jason first created an account on Wikipedia in August 2006, after tracking Hurricane Katrina and countless other storms in 2005. Since then, he has written four featured articles and 21 good articles. Recently, Jason has done great work expanding and cleaning up Cyclone Yasa, one of the strongest storms ever recorded in the South Pacific basin. He is also an active content creator, currently writing Cyclone Meena. Overall, Jason has done an outstanding job expanding the scope of tropical cyclone articles in the Southern Hemisphere basins, such as the South Pacific, where there is, sadly, a shortage of active users. We want to thank him for his wonderful work, and thus award him the Member of the Month award for this edition.
New WikiProject Members since the last newsletter
More information can be found here. This list lists members who have joined/rejoined the WikiProject since the release of the last issue. Sorted chronologically.
To our new members: welcome to the project, and happy editing! Feel free to check the to-do list at the bottom right of the newsletter for things that you might want to work on. To our veteran members: thank you for your edits and your tireless contributions!
A year in review: WPTC's accomplishments in 2020
2020 has been a hard year for many of us. Depending on where you live, the COVID-19 pandemic began as early as January. In most of the world, the pandemic ramped up in February and March, reaching its first peak in April–May. A second wave struck in June–August, which saw cases dramatically increase across the globe, while the third and largest wave began around October. However, during this pandemic, through lock-downs and online learning, as well as the the insanely active 2020 Atlantic hurricane season, our WikiProject saw a huge influx of new editors showing interest in editing tropical cyclone articles. Here, we will take a look at the stats:
Due to recent incidents involving sockpuppetry within WPTC, I invited some editors to address the problem of socking inside the project. MarioJump83!
Sockpuppetry is a serious offense committed by various users on Wikipedia. Our own WPTC is not immune to this travesty. WPTC has seen its fair share of abuse from serial vandals and LTAs throughout the years. From 2013 through 2018, IPhonehurricane95 vandalized dozens of tropical cyclone articles and created more than 200 sock accounts. For several years, mostly spanning a two-year period from 2013 to 2014, IPhonehurricane95 defaced numerous tropical cyclone articles, mostly ones that he had once contributed to, were major storms, or were storms in an active tropical cyclone season. He also attacked essentially every single active editor on WPTC at the time, and he went on to attack every single Admin and CheckUser who had ever blocked him, in addition to making making racist remarks and threats of harassment. He eventually went cross-wiki, forcing the intervention of Stewards. In July 2014, he began including graphic 9/11 images in his vandalism, which further damaged the image of the project. IPhonehurricane95's vandalism inspired several copy-cat vandals, including one who has continued to plague the project to this day. This is a problem with LTAs and serial vandals – those who aren't stopped quickly enough and early on often bring bad publicity to the project, in addition to elevating the risk of copycat inspiring knock-offs. In 2016, IPhonehurricane95's socking spree dramatically decreased, with the LTA disappearing in 2018. Sockpuppetry on WPTC has not been nearly as bad since then, but sockpuppetry persisted on WPTC afterward, even to this day. Recent LTAs that WPTC had to deal with include Fly High in the Sky and Wyatt2049, and possibly Evlekis, with the later two engaging in a campaign of vandalism claiming fake Category 5 upgrades (or Category 0 downgrades) "from God" that attracted a lot of bad publicity. Recently, someusersdabbled with socking, which got them into trouble. With the recent breaches of trust on WPTC and the confirmation of socking by CUs in several of the newer members, some members of WPTC have called for WPTC members to be vetted by CUs. In the past year alone, a few editors who had recently joined the project came out as sockmasters who went on to become LTAs, further adding to the pressure on WPTC. Personally, I feel that the newer users who joined within the past 6 months with a history of disruption should be examined by a CheckUser, but long-standing CU policy is to not investigate anyone unless there are serious allegations of sockpuppetry (with evidence). This policy exists for good reason, and these requests for blanket CUs may very well be turned down, if proposed.
Sockpuppetry is not only bad for the reputation and integrity of the project. It is also harmful to the well-being of editors on the site, especially when they become the targets of attacks. In addition, sockpuppetry breaks the trust of the community when the said offender is a trusted and valued member of the community, no matter the level and duration of the offense. Those editors have to work hard to regain the trust of the community, and in some cases, trust may never be restored. Perhaps equally as bad, sockpuppetry leads to false accusations of the practice and claims of intentional bad faith against both reformed ex-sockpuppeteers and non-socking editors alike. This further damages the reputation of the site, while unnecessarily inflaming tensions between editors on the project and damaging the cohesion between the community. These aspersions also hurt well-meaning editors on the site, and can have the unwanted consequences of embittering them or prompting them to go into retirement. While there are users on WPTC who are dedicated to rooting out and combatting vandals and sockpuppeteers on the site (including some who are a part of the Counter-Vandalism Unit), this is a responsibility that the entire project needs to bear as a whole, since socking is an issue that affects the entire project in one way or another. Editors should be willing and able to investigate potential cases of socking and other types of abusive behavior, while maintaining good faith at the same time. Sockpuppetry is serious issue and an ongoing challenge to the project. Equally as bad are unfounded allegations of the abuse against editors with a long-standing history of being a net-positive. However, together, as a community, we can combat this menace to safeguard the integrity and accuracy of WPTC articles, and make Wikipedia a healthy, productive environment. ~ LightandDark2000 🌀
WPTC had its humble beginnings in the early days of Wikipedia. The WikiProject was founded by Jdorje on October 5, 2005, during the heart of the record-breaking and devastating 2005 Atlantic hurricane season. The founding of WPTC provided a place for editors who had an interest in tropical cyclones to collaborate. Over the next few years, dozens of users flocked to WPTC, growing the ranks to over 60 active members by 2011. This was the first generation of WPTC editors, many of whom had been active on Wikipedia within a few years of its founding in 2001. The first WPTC editors worked hard on improving the quality and quantity of tropical cyclone articles, attaining 100 Good Articles (GAs) and several Featured Articles (FAs) by January 2007. The number of existing TC articles grew each month, with the project boasting 1,000 articles by January 2008. However, as the years passed by, long-time members of the WPTC gradually began dropping out. Reasons included entering college, a busy work schedule, loss of interest in the subject, and retirement from Wikipedia, among other reasons. By January 2011, more than 120 members had either become inactive or had left Wikipedia entirely. By the end of the year, WPTC membership had hemorrhaged to the point where roughly 19 users remained in the WikiProject. As of this writing, the first 13 members on the WPTC roster can be considered the remaining "core" of this first generation that has stayed with the project throughout the years. But the initial WPTC Golden Age was over. The flow of new recruits fell off sharply, and overall interest declined. WPTC would remain at this reduced level of membership and activity for years to come.
More users continued to join the WikiProject over the next several years, albeit on a significantly reduced scale. Even then, the vast majority of the work done on tropical cyclone articles were largely carried out by a "core" of roughly a dozen experienced editors who stayed on with the WikiProject throughout the year, even as tropical cyclone activity shifted between the Northern and Southern Hemispheres. However, this reduction in the numbers of active users meant that many more articles ended up being neglected, or suffered from reduced quality. The flow of new GAs and FAs slowed down, and new FACs almost ground to a halt. Some long-time editors, such as Hurricanehink, continued to hammer out TC articles, while recruiting and mentoring new members. The second generation of WPTC editors began showing up in 2013 through 2016, including Nova Crystallis, Typhoon2013, Master of Time, KN2731, and me. (I had edited on Wikipedia for several years before then, but I wasn't officially a part of WPTC prior to 2014.) While new editors continued to join each year, others kept on leaving, and the size of the roster remained around the same size. On a Featured Article review, one of the reviewers even remarked that WPTC was no longer as lively as it once was, with much of the activity having died down. Working on WPTC grew depressing at times, with some of the active editors moving on to other topics when their basins of interest went inactive (usually when the northern hemisphere seasons came to an end). Articles suffered from quality control and content issues in numerous places, especially articles on storms outside of the North Atlantic and East/Central Pacific hurricane basins, where most of the activity from experienced editors was historically concentrated. Articles for storms in the Southern Hemisphere were the hardest-hit, with only a few editors, such as Jason Rees, continuing to work hard on them year-round. As usual, the vast majority of work fell on a tight-knit group of roughly two dozen editors, most of whom were senior editors who had been present since the early days of WPTC. At times, I wondered whether I would ever see the day in which we would have enough active editors on our roster to bring WPTC back to its former glory.
From 2016 to 2018, more users joined WPTC, including ChocolateTrain, Hurricane Noah, and MarioProtIV, some of whom would later play a key role in revitalizing tropical cyclone articles or WPTC on some level. In 2018, Hurricane Noah helped restructure some of the internal dynamics of WPTC, including the creation of specific task forces for certain topics and also designing a new award system, in order to help motivate WPTC members and also to help coordinate the work between other editors more effectively. That same year, he kicked off a massive campaign to get more articles to GA and FA status, By late 2020, more than two dozen articles had been brought up to GA or FA status, and WPTC saw its first potential Featured Topic Candidate in more than 6 years (the 2018 Pacific hurricane season). After 2019, the number of new members gradually increased, and activity picked up across the WikiProject. A third batch of new editors showed up between 2018 and 2019, tripling the WPTC roster to 60+ active members. These editors included FleurDeOdile, CycloneYoris, EBGamingWiki, Sandy14156, SaiTheCyclone, DavidTheMeteorologist, JavaHurricane, and others. In 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic struck. Despite the ensuing lockdowns and other fallouts from the pandemic, WPTC saw an explosion of new editors that same year. This 4th generation of editors was, by far, probably the largest influx of new membership that WPTC had ever seen. By the end of the year, the active membership roster had exploded from 69to 124 active members. Our newer members from 2020 include AC5230, CycloneFootball71, Chicdat, Hurricaneboy23, Chlod, Destroyeraa, MarioJump83, ChessEric, Modokai, CodingCyclone, Cyclone Toby, TornadoLGS, HurricaneCovid, Skarmory, and many, many others. The wait was finally over. New life had been breathed back into WPTC. It was almost as if the good old days of the WikiProject were starting to return. While we've had our ups and downs this year, the influx of new editors infused WPTC with much-needed new blood and also helped relieve the senior editors of some of the burdens they've had to bear for years. Our hope is that the vast majority of these new editors will stay with us going forward, even as tropical cyclone activity cycles on and off across the world. Even after the pandemic-related lockdowns end.
In closing, I want to thank my fellow WPTC editors for my experience. When I first started as an IP editor on Wikipedia more than a decade ago, I never imagined that WikiProjects existed, not to mention one specifically tailored for tropical cyclones. I had a rough start here, with a bitey reception from most of the others who communicated with me, while also struggling to learn some of Wikipedia's fundamental policies (particularly citations). However, I eventually eased into the place and the others warmed to me, and my proficiency in editing improved as I spent more time on Wikipedia. The truth is, whenever I came under pressure in other areas of Wikipedia, whether it is from hounding, witch hunts, attacks, or other hostile behavior, I've always retreated back to WPTC. Why? Because I've always felt much more welcome here. And safe. In some ways, WPTC has become my home on Wikipedia. I've gotten so much more out of here than I had expected to as well. My time on Wikipedia helped sharpen my writing (and typing) skills, which was a rather nice bonus. I've also made a number of new friends here (some of whom I've grown rather close with), all of whom I enjoy working with. Thank you, all of you, for everything. Thank you for showing me what the Wikipedia experience should be like, and thank you for being willing to befriend me. I look forward to continue working with you all and growing with you in the years to come. May you all have a wonderful 2021! ~ LightandDark2000 🌀
Hello, this is my first opinion piece on Hurricane Herald as MarioJump83. In this opinion piece, I want to explain why I'm not as active as I'm hoping for in recent weeks. I do not plan to ever make this opinion piece at all, but I had to speak out about my issue with my activity in order to balance this edition of Hurricane Herald as well as to prevent attempts at adding my work-in-progress opinion piece to this issue because I'm planning to package that opinion piece with a long-finished but unfortunately delayed opinion piece. I want to apologize for delaying my work-in-progress opinion piece numerous times, given there are numerous issues about it, one of which (stress) will be addressed in this opinion piece.
Since last December, I have repeatedly have been on semi-wikibreaks. Wikipedia, as I know it, is a serious business. I was no longer the "nice guy" when I got my MoTM. Stress has been building up as I faced college exams as well as my father's stroke which happened on December 17, 2020. I attempted to break this semi-wikibreak once as I requested to change my name from SMB99thx into MarioJump83 for a breath of a fresh air (some days before that I requested deletion of my userpage for the same reason), and did some AfC reviewing spree in January 2 and 3. But as it turns out, it was quite a failure as three AfC submissions I accepted ended up being in jeopardy, with me trying to save the last one standing. I think these experiences ruined my chance to become a permanent new page reviewer, pushed me back into my semi-wikibreak once more and I had to enroll myself into New Page Patrol School in hopes of getting back into what I wanted. As such, I decided to commit into content creation as I was granted page mover rights (temporary) on January 4. As of now, I'm trying my best to come out on this second semi-wikibreak, bringing myself out of trouble that I didn't intend to participate in and planning to become autopatrolled some day as the college exams are winding over.
Wish me and my family for the best in the coming weeks, anyone! I'm hoping that it will happen after the release of this issue, if not later. By the way - even when I'm still stressed - I am going to wish everybody Happy New Year and Happy 20th Wikipedia anniversary! (Don't forget that we also reached edit number 1,000,000,000!)
The Hurricane Herald is the semi-regular newsletter of WikiProject Tropical Cyclones. The newsletter aims to provide in summary the recent activities and developments of the WikiProject, in addition to global tropical cyclone activity. The Hurricane Herald has been running since its first edition ran on June 4, 2006. If you wish to receive or discontinue subscription to this newsletter, please visit the member list. New members will automatically receive this newsletter. This issue of The Hurricane Herald covers all project related events from January 15–February 28, 2021. This edition's editors and authors are MarioJump83, Destroyeraa, HurricaneCovid, CycloneFootball71, HurricaneEdgar, Skarmory, Typhoon2013 (editor's pick for member of the month), and our member of the month, LightandDark2000! Please visit this page and bookmark any suggestions of interest to you. This will help improve the newsletter and other cyclone-related articles. Past editions, including past MoTMs and SoTMs, can be viewed here.
In response to the initial selection of Cyclone Toby as MoTM of the last edition, the long established-practice of picking MoTM (edition) by the main editor of Hurricane Herald was changed, with one that involved most of the WPTC community being created. The original practice continues to live on, but in the form of MoTM (Editor's Pick), as wished by longtime editor of the Hurricane Herald, Hurricanehink. The details of this event were recorded in the notes of the last edition and in this edition.
On January 13, 2021, Destroyeraa announced the Cyclone Cup, which was inspired by the WikiCup. There are seven participants in the 2021 Cyclone Cup, who are: CodingCyclone, Skarmory, CycloneFootball71, MarioJump83, Jason Rees, HurricaneCovid, and LightandDark2000. This is the second-ever competition organized by members of WPTC. The first competition organized by WPTC members was the WPTC Bowl, which started on January 2012, before flaming out by the end of 2012 without anyone winning the competition. The WPTC Bowl was also inspired by the WikiCup, similar to the Cyclone Cup, but ran differently from the Cyclone Cup. We hope that the Cyclone Cup ends up successful, with a winner.
In the light of BCNY2011's membership situation (now globally locked and was found to be socking also), I, MarioJump83, heavily revamped the members list of WPTC as well as formalized WPTC bylaws, with some modifications, regarding inactive membership, thus allowing veteran WPTC members Runningonbrains, Juliancolton (two of the 14 WPTC core members), Atomic7732 and Derpdadoodle to rejoin the project. I also tried to enforce some guidelines regarding recruiting and membership as it was discussed previously, but since I did not discuss and establish the consensus in regards to enforcement and the shape of "guidelines" as of now is more of an essay, for now they will be considered unofficial and have yet to be implemented. It will be discussed later on, probably in a survey.
During Wikipedia's 15th anniversary, I officially revived the Non-tropical storms WikiProject (WPNTS), due to WPTC editors actively joining the WikiProject, despite the fact that the WikiProject was defunct. (More reasons will be stated in my opinion piece in the next issue of the WPNTS newsletter.) Despite its formal revival, WPNTS was not fully reorganized until February 7. That day, I closely modeled that WikiProject after WikiProject Tropical cyclones, thus tying WPNTS together with WPTC, as the two WikiProjects are closely intertwined. In the meanwhile, I discovered the defunct newsletter of WPNTS and later on, WikiProject Severe Weather, both of which has their last issues in March 2008. As I began WPNTS makeover, I revived both publications. The WikiProject Non-tropical storms Newsletter, which is known as The Frozen Times, and the WikiProject Severe weather Newsletter will become sister publications of The Hurricane Herald going forward. I have set their publication dates on March 15, and April 1, 2021, respectively, and they are going to become semi-regular newsletters. Before they ever get published, I implore you to help me writing these newsletters, the links for which are listed here: The Frozen Times, WikiProject Severe Weather.
Alongside the revamp above, I discovered the 2011 list through looking at the edit history of the members page, which shows the true extent of this WikiProject's popularity, as well as the members that joined the project after 2011 but were eventually removed from the roster, as the after effects of Hurricanefan25's mass removal of inactive WikiProject members. I restored them back to the list during and after the revamp - they were truly part of the WikiProject during the golden age of WPTC and I see it's removal by the sock of Perseus, Son of Zeus, as effectively destroying the history of the WPTC because of the importance of these members. The restored list reveals that Knowledgekid87is actually a member of WPTC back in the day and clearly still participates in the project, while Rosalina2427 is actually an another member of the 14 golden age WPTC remnants that still remain to this day. (Note: These were the members that was listed before TheAustinMan joined the project) Our newsletter's subscribers AySz88, RingTailedFox, WmE, Douglasr007, Dylan620 and X! were actually members of this WikiProject, despite the belief that they weren't. And the others, such as Good kitty and Miss Madeline were very influential in the building of this WikiProject. In conclusion, you can see that there is more from the WikiProject than meets the eye. The WikiProject used to be huge before 2010s decade started, and they were the building blocks of the project that unfortunately were erased by some sock.
The three-month merge moratorium, which has been implemented since November 23, 2020, ended on February 23, at 03:45:00 UTC. During the moratorium, when it was in effect, there were generally no attempts to discuss changes to the moratorium, nor were there any requests for article mergers. However, there were two requests to allow an exception to the merge moratorium. One of which was to merge Meteorological history of Hurricane Michael to the Hurricane Michael as that article presents an obstacle for Hurricane Michael article to reach GA - the consensus for exception was quickly reached on Christmas 2020, and on January 5 the article was finally merged. The other, which was meant for Hurricane Jeanne's impacts articles, was never made into a proposal and thus were not seriously discussed at all. The first such merger after the merge moratorium expired was merging Tropical Storm Amanda (2020) and Tropical Storm Cristobal (2020) into Tropical Storm Amanda–Cristobal, which later was requested to be moved into 2020 Central America and Mexico floods and opposers of the merger requested splitting them back once again.
I, MarioJump83, the interim coordinator of 2018 Global FT's WPAC squad, feels bad with what is going on as I felt we are taking a step back with the ongoing real-life difficulties regarding important members of our task force. KN2731 had to take a wikibreak because of the compulsory service in Singapore and will likely be gone for two years; Destroyeraa's activities were highly inhibited by multiple illnesses, school exams, "bullying" issues, and series of winter storms this month; Hurricane Noah almost took a two-month-long wikibreak because due to college studies, which Noah is committed to (he also left the WPTC Discord for a couple of months, due to toxicity). I don't really like to take a lot of responsibilities within the 2018 Global FT task force, as I had joined with the intent of helping GA's that involves this year, i.e. like what I did in Cyclone Ava and Cyclone Owen as of now, but with so many of us were forced out of commission due to these problems I mentioned, I and LightandDark2000 had to take much of the responsibility within the task force. Because of this reason, I strongly recommend you, readers of Hurricane Herald, to join this task force to help take pressure off from us. Note that this is not a formal invite, as Wikipedia is free and anyone can edit, but this is what we have to deal with in this current situation, especially because of our real-life problems and commitments. Let's hope that we, including you, can make this through with what we can do!
We are recruiting
If you are interested in writing new articles, promoting articles to GA, or helping with the FAC review process for the Global 2018 FT project, please reach out to LightandDark2000 or any other member of the 2018 FT task force.
Storm of the month and other tropical activity for the rest of January and February
SoTM for January – Cyclone Eloise
Cyclone Eloise formed in January 14, to the east of another system, Cyclone Joshua, in the central South Indian Ocean. The disturbance developed into a tropical depression on January 16, and on the next day, the depression intensified into Moderate Tropical Storm Eloise. Eloise struggled to intensify, due to unfavorable conditions; however, the storm still managed to intensify further into Severe Tropical Storm Eloise on January 19. This strengthening trend did not last long, as Eloise made landfall in northern Madagascar, and interaction with mountains caused Eloise to weaken into a moderate tropical storm once more. Eloise emerged into the Mozambique Channel on January 20 and started intensifying again, despite having recently experienced a sustained land interaction. However, the storm slowed down, due to the location and the surrounding environment. Later on, Eloise managed to intensify into a full-fledged tropical cyclone, before proceeding to undergo rapid intensification as the storm neared landfall. Eloise peaked as a Category 2-equivalent tropical cyclone just before making landfall near Beira, Mozambique, on January 22, which had been affected by Tropical Storm Chalane just weeks prior, and was still recovering from the devastating impacts of Cyclone Idai nearly two years ago. Eloise then degenerated into a remnant low above Zimbabwe on January 25, and per JTWC, the remnants of Eloise soon dissipated above Botswana on January 26.
Eloise caused numerous disasters throughout numerous countries, specifically, in Madagascar, South Africa, Zimbabwe, Eswatini, and Mozambique. Mozambique was the hardest-hit. In Madagascar, Eloise destroyed 190 homes and caused the death of one person. In South Africa, Eloise caused the deaths of 10 people, four of which were children, in addition to being responsible for making another 7 people go missing. In Zimbabwe, Eloise caused damage and destruction to nearly a thousand homes, some of which were badly affected by Idai two years ago. Three people were also swept away by flooding from Eloise and were presumed to be dead. In Eswatini, over 1,500 people were affected by the storm, two of whom were killed. Eloise also damaged the water system and flooded the gravel roads and low-lying bridges. In Mozambique, the residents compared the cyclone's impacts to Cyclone Idai, which had catastrophically devastated the country two years earlier. This storm caused psychological trauma and mental health crises among the residents of the country. Eloise caused nine deaths in Mozambique, but massive amounts of farmland were flooded, and the storm also damaged over 30,000 houses, the majority of which were destroyed by the storm. 579 classrooms and 86 health centers had to be repaired after the storm.
SoTM for February – Cyclone Guambe
Cyclone Guambe formed as a disturbance in the Mozambique Channel in February 10. The disturbance subsequently transitioned into a subtropical depression two days later, as it made landfall in Mozambique. For the next several days, the system made a slow counterclockwise loop over Mozambique, while slowly organizing. The system re-emerged into the Mozambique Channel on February 16 and was designated as Tropical Disturbance 11. The disturbance was soon upgraded into a depression later that day, and the storm became Moderate Tropical Storm Guambe on the next day. Subsequently, Guambe proceeded to strengthen, intensifying into a severe tropical storm on February 18. Guambe then began to undergo rapid intensification, becoming a tropical cyclone on February 19, before peaking later that day as a Category 2-equivalent tropical cyclone. However, Guambe then underwent an eyewall replacement cyclone and began to weaken on February 20, as the storm accelerated towards the southeast. On February 21, Guambe became extratropical, Guambe was later absorbed by another extratropical cyclone on February 23.
Guambe caused widespread flooding in Mozambique, which displaced over 27,000 people and worsened the ongoing crisis in the region. Prisoners had to be transferred away from the cyclone because of potential flooding. There were no deaths recorded and damages were unknown, however the worst part of Guambe wasn't there yet. South Africa were also flooded by Guambe, which might have been caused by the secondary low-level circulation center (LLCC) of Guambe. This secondary LLCC had caused Guambe to slow down, which probably had devastating effects on Bazaruto Archipelago National Park's marine life, as 186 Spinner dolphins were probably killed by the storm. After Guambe re-emerged into the Mozambique Channel, no additional damage to human property was reported, thus marking the end of Guambe's impacts on land.
Western Pacific – The West Pacific basin saw its first tropical cyclone of the year develop, which was a tropical depression. This storm affected the Philippines for two days, on January 19–20. Another tropical cyclone developed in the next month, which developed into Tropical Storm Dujuan. Dujuan was not as damaging as the first tropical depression, but it ended up being deadlier. Dujuan dissipated soon after impacting the Philippines.
South-West Indian Ocean – Eloise, the seventh named storm of the season, formed on January 14, before becoming a named storm three days later. On January 19, Eloise made landfall on Madagascar as a moderate tropical storm. Afterward, the storm moved into the Mozambique Channel, undergoing rapid intensification as it neared Mozambique, before making landfall near Beira, Mozambique at peak intensity on January 23, as a Category-2 equivalent tropical cyclone, with the storm strengthening all the way up to landfall. Eloise weakened as it moved inland, dissipating on January 25. On January 17, Joshua entered the South-West Indian Ocean basin from the Australian region basin, before dissipating two days later. On January 27, Tropical Low 10U entered the basin from the Australian region, which was classified as Tropical Depression 09. The depression never strengthened into a tropical storm and soon dissipated on the next day. Faraji formed on February 4, and became a tropical storm next day. Faraji explosively intensified to become the first Category 5-equivalent tropical cyclone (according to JTWC estimates) in the basin since Fantala in 2016, and the first Category 5-Equivalent tropical cyclone worldwide in 2021. Faraji was projected to restrengthen, and possible threaten land areas as it tracked westward towards Madagascar; however, this threat never materialized, as the storm encountered more hostile conditions and weakened instead. The storm degenerated into a remnant low on February 13, before dissipating 3 days later. Guambe formed on February 10, and became a subtropical depression two days later, while making landfall near Inhambane, Mozambique. The system remained inland until February 16, when it re-emerged into the Mozambique Channel and was designated as Tropical Disturbance 11. The disturbance then began to strengthen, becoming a tropical storm on the next day, and a tropical cyclone later three days later. Guambe peaked as a Category 2-equivalent tropical cyclone on February 19. The cyclone was forecasted to strengthen even further; however, Guambe underwent an eyewall replacement cycle and began to weaken. The storm became post-tropical on February 21 and dissipated two days later.
Australian region – On January 16, Tropical Low 07U intensified into Tropical Cyclone Joshua. Afterward, five more storms developed in the basin within the second part of the month: Tropical Low 08U, Tropical Cyclone Kimi, Tropical Low 10U, Tropical Low 11U, and Tropical Low 12U. Joshua moved into the South-West Indian Ocean basin on January 17. On January 21, 08U made landfall in the Western Territory of Australia, before dissipating two days later. Kimi meandered off the coast of Queensland from January 16 to 19, before dissipating offshore. 10U formed to the southeast of Christmas Island and remained over water throughout its duration. 10U exited the basin into the South-West Indian Ocean on January 27. On January 25, Tropical Low 11U formed, followed by Tropical Low 12U on January 28. 11U became Lucas and exited the basin as it peaked on February 1. Tropical Low 12U remained overland for most of its existence, moving parallel to the western coastline of Australia for 5 days, before emerging over open water on February 4. 12U never reached tropical cyclone intensity, and became extratropical on the next day. However, the storm turned back towards Australia and resumed moving parallel to the coast, before dissipating several days later. Tropical Low 13U formed on February 6, a day after 12U became extratropical, and made landfall near the North Territory–Queensland border, before dissipating on February 8. Another tropical low, 14U, formed ten days later, and lasted for five days before dissipating. Tropical Low 15U formed on February 23 and became Marian. Marian eventually proceeded to undergo rapid intensification, becoming a Category 3 severe tropical cyclone on February 28, making it the most intense cyclone of the season, as of this writing. Tropical Low 16U formed near the end of the month.
South Pacific – Tropical Disturbance 04F developed to the west of Port Vila, Vanuatu, on January 22. Several days later, Tropical Disturbances 05F and 06F developed near Fiji. All three systems organized into tropical depressions by January 28. 04F and 06F never developed into tropical cyclones, while 05F became Cyclone Ana. Cyclone Ana dissipated February 1, the same day that Cyclone Lucas entered the basin. Lucas became subtropical on February 3, before dissipating shortly afterward. On February 7, Tropical Disturbance 09F formed and nearly reached tropical cyclone status, before dissipating. Two weeks later, Tropical Disturbance 10F developed near Wallis and Futuna but never developed into a tropical depression.
South Atlantic – On February 4, a rare, fully-tropical storm was designated in the basin as 01Q by the NOAA. The storm lasted briefly before losing tropical characteristics, with the NOAA discontinuing their bulletins later that day. However, the Brazilian Navy Hydrographic Center never issued advisories on the storm.
LightandDark2000 joined Wikipedia as an IP editor on May 2, 2009. Although a coupleof users encouraged him to make an account early on, he decided to continue editing articles from his IPs for the next few years. He registered his user account in May 2012 and spent another year on Wikipedia as an IP editor, before fully transitioning over to his account in the summer of 2013. He received an invitation to join WPTC in March 2014, which he accepted. Ever since joining WPTC, LightandDark2000 has been a regular editor on tropical cyclone articles and one of Wikipedia's most active rollbackers, putting him on the forefront in the fight against vandals and LTAs, and actively steering the WikiProject out of stagnation. He also defended WPTC from numerous vandals, including the likes of the LTAs IPhonehurricane95 and Lightning Sabre. In late 2014–early 2017, LightandDark2000 largely moved out of WPTC into MILHIST (as well as taking a 3-month WikiBreak in the fall of 2016—due to college work and stress from on-wiki hounding), before returning to WPTC in September 2017, following the devastating landfall of Hurricane Harvey in Texas. From there, LightandDark2000 regularly contributed to tropical cyclone articles, as well as articles on other storms and natural disasters, before taking a series of WikiBreaks in late 2019 through mid-2020, due to college work and real-life activities.
However, LightandDark2000 returned in July 2020, just as the extremely-active North Atlantic hurricane season got underway. By the time the last issue of The Hurricane Herald was released, LightandDark2000 had made a full return and was ramping up activity, even as WPTC was beset by a series of problems within its membership, ranging from blocks to stress-induced WikiBreaks. During this time of crisis, LightandDark2000 stepped up very quickly - first, he helped out a number of users who were struggling with personal issues on the WikiProject. Then, he joined 2018 Global FT (currently the Interim Coordinator, with Hurricane Noah and KN2731 stepping aside due to real-life commitments). From there, he conducted his first GA review, which was for Hurricane Beryl. After that, he took on a major role in the writing of the previous issue of The Hurricane Herald, which as of this writing is the biggest issue of Hurricane Herald ever published, at an excess of 50,000 bytes, as well as being the most visually-balanced Hurricane Herald issue since the first issues of Hurricane Herald (if it were to be viewed using a 1920×1080 desktop using Legacy Vector). For these reasons and his contributions to the WPTC in the past, we will finally thank LightandDark2000 for all of his contributions by rewarding him with the Member of the Month for this edition. It's quite sad that he didn't get this award since the restart of Hurricane Herald in late 2018 to this day, but now, he has the opportunity to win the award for the first time. We are hoping to see more from LightandDark2000 in the future. For example, he joined the 2021 Cyclone Cup (and also volunteered to take on the role of a judge, if necessary), a new competition for WPTC members based on the WikiCup!
New WikiProject Members since the last newsletter
More information can be found here. This list lists members who have joined/rejoined the WikiProject since the release of the last issue. Sorted chronologically.
To our new members: welcome to the project, and happy editing! Feel free to check the to-do list at the bottom right of the newsletter for things that you might want to work on. To our veteran members: thank you for your edits and your tireless contributions!
Featured Content
From January 15 to February 28 no featured article were promoted.
From the Main Page: Documents WikiProject related materials that have appeared on the main page from January 15–February 28, 2021 in chronological order.
There are currently no featured article candidates.
Current assessment table
Assessments valid as of this printing. Depending on when you may be viewing this newsletter, the table may be outdated. See here for the latest, most up to date statistics. As of this issue, there are 164 featured articles and 70 featured lists. There are 133 A-class articles, and 1,010 good articles. There are only 71 B-class articles, perhaps because because most articles of that quality already passed a GA review. There are 415 C-class articles, 788 start-class articles, and 182 stub-class articles, with 23 lists, and 9 current articles. These figures mean that slightly more than half of the project is rated a GA or better. Typhoon Warren was the 1000th GA in the project.
The following is the current progress on the three milestone goals set by the WikiProject as of this publishing. They can be found, updated, at the main WikiProject page.
In this section, we want to thank these first-generation WPTC members for being able to stay in here for years before 2020. They (David, Keith, Hylian and Spin) are one of greatest content creators in WPTC history, helping to build and shape WPTC for what it is now today. Without them, we don't know if WPTC would be like today. David Roth's expertise, Keith Edkins' maintenance activities, Hylian's and Spin's content creation skill helped a lot in the early days of WPTC and we hope some of us can replicate what they can do in today's WPTC.
Typhoon2013 first edited Wikipedia in August 2013, and ever since joining Wikipedia, Typhoon2013 has been one of the most prolific editors in Western Pacific basin. Since last November, Typhoon2013 has been working very hard on getting tropicalcycloneintensitylistsofWesternPacificbasin done, lending a hand in creation of named storms lists of C, P, R, and S (alongside finishing List of named storms (T) which I was unable to complete because of college), as well as finishing storm lists of Pacific typhoon seasons from 1980 to 1964. For the efforts Typhoon2013 has done leading to the publishing of this newsletter, I, MarioJump83, as one of many editors of Hurricane Herald, will be picking Typhoon2013 as the Member of the Month (Editor's Pick) and thank him for his contributions to build a bedrock foundation for the rapidly-growing Western Pacific coverage of the Wikipedia. We wish Typhoon2013 best of luck at college!
Was planned to be published in 44th edition of Hurricane Herald, however due to some issue (and per Destroyeraa's request), I have delayed this opinion piece further into this edition. At this point, I do not want to see this opinion piece getting delayed further into May 2021 as I really, really want this OP, alongside my OP below to finally see the light at the end of the tunnel. MarioJump83!
I created my Wikipedia account on January 18, 2020. I seems so long ago. My first edit was creating my user page, and my first mainspace edit was on Hammonton, New Jersey. My first autoconformed edit was on my userpage. By then, I was editing about myself and roads. My first tropical cyclone edit was on January 30, on Tropical Storm Nestor, which got reverted. I also edited about the coronavirus epidemic before it became a worldwide pandemic. I edited List of United States tornadoes in April 2020, but got bitten on the talk page, though my love for tornadoes kept me editing pages. I also began editing numerous cyclone pages, and joined WPTC on May 19. It was sad that no one noticed that I joined, and no one welcomed me on my talk page for five months already. I submitted my first article, Tropical Storm Bertha (2020), which was accepted. I was still rather new, and mistook Chicdat as an admin. It was June already. Still, no one welcomed me. Finally, on June 5, Hurricanehink took notice of my edits and welcome me! Around the same time, I downloaded Twinkle. I found the CSD function very cool, and I admittedly didn't read WP:CSD and misused it. One month later, I met my first real vandal, which turned out to be a Force Thirteen kid who was messing around changing everything to Force Thirteen without leaving a source or an edit summary, which most people will take as vandalism. It turned out to be pretty rough, and did not end well for both of us. I was still learning at that stage, as shown here. After that, my experience here got much better. Perhaps it was the "learning-the-ropes" phase that is the hardest for all Wikipedians. I created and wrote some good articles, with my first being Hurricane Dolores, promoted on September 24. I also developed a good relationship with many of my fellow Wikipedians, including the editors/writers of this newsletter and many other newer and older users. Then came the sock block. I'll not get into much detail about that, though I will be forever indebted to the countless users who vouched for me and who welcomed me back to the community with open arms. Thank you. I am glad to be here today.~Destroyeraa🌀🇺🇸
My experiences of tropical cyclones and tropical cyclone editing before joining WPTC - by MarioJump83
I planned this OP way back to September 2020, but because of issues with length and college (also even stress - detailed in my previous opinion piece My stress), I decided to delay this opinion piece until now. I also intend to publish this opinion piece alongside Destroyeraa's OP above, thus pushing back the date where I can publish this opinion piece further. Thus I fully apologize for delaying this opinion piece for way too long. I was unable to spend my time on building this opinion piece because of these issues and thus getting this opinion piece complete in time. By the way, this will be the final opinion piece I will write for Hurricane Herald - I'm done with it after two opinion pieces as SMB99thx and two opinion pieces as MarioJump83. It was so much fun creating opinion pieces, but I don't want to have opinion pieces for four straight issues already since the 43rd edition! I'm still editing Hurricane Herald in the future, but not writing opinion pieces any further - ...unless you're inviting me to write an opinion piecein my user talk page, which I'll do my best to comply.
Hello, WikiProject Tropical cyclones! I want to tell you about the reasons why I liked and loved tracking tropical cyclones and my experience regarding editing tropical cyclones before I joined this WikiProject.
First of all, I have been watching tropical cyclones but on-and-off since 2012. That year, Hurricane Sandy as I remembered it got significant coverage on my country, Indonesia (Badai Sandy). That hurricane was the first tropical cyclone that I had ever known in my life (it's possible that Hurricane Katrina had significant coverage in my country, but I didn't remember anything at all about it), and without it I would never known about tropical cyclones by myself. When that hurricane was about to be finished, I visited the article about 2012 Atlantic hurricane season on Wikipedia, and it was the first article about tropical cyclones that I have ever read on Wikipedia. From that day, my interest on tropical cyclones grew but it was limited to the Atlantic hurricanes only. When 2013 started, if I'm thinking about tropical cyclones I frequently visited 2013 Atlantic hurricane season, and in particular the Seasonal summary section, which drew my eyes into when I didn't edit tropical cyclone articles yet.
In November 2013, however, as I'm becoming an uncle of one (now three), Typhoon Haiyan showed up. That typhoon which devastated the Southeast Asian brother country of Philippines caused my interest on tropical cyclones to grow outside of Atlantic hurricanes. Now I'm finally aware of what's happening in Pacific, and it was the first time that I learned that tropical cyclones are everywhere in the world, not just Atlantic. That time, I read 2013 Pacific typhoon season as well as 2013 Pacific hurricane season (I don't remember reading these kinds of articles before that). When I read about it, I also visited 2013 Atlantic hurricane season once again and I was shocked by that it wasn't active! As such, I didn't watch tropical cyclones that much for most of 2014 and 2015. Hurricane Patricia didn't convince me enough to watch tropical cyclones again. In 2016, things changed again that led me to make my first edits on tropical cyclones in Wikipedia.
Once Hurricane Matthew came and with it significant coverage on Indonesia that I have never seen since Hurricane Sandy, I finally watched tropical cyclones full-time for the first time. That hurricane was the cyclone that finally got me going for the tropical cyclones (not just the recent seasons, but the older seasons and also SHEM) and my quick-growing interest on tropical cyclones led me to find what made me uncomfortable. That led me to make my first edit on tropical cyclone-related articles in Wikipedia - which was to add Central Pacific to a navigation template about leading tropical cyclones in March 7, 2017. Later that month, I made a second edit, which was to remove a year from a link to Hurricane Omar. These additions are quite "cosmetic" (as said by ChessEric about Hurricane Michelle GA), but soon enough in the next month I found more things that made me more uncomfortable - they are legitimate vandalism. The first edit I made in that month was to revert a vandalism on Hurricane Andrew (I edited it again after that, which was to change mb to mbar). On the next day, I fixed another vandalism in 1954 Atlantic hurricane season. That isn't the end yet, as I found one more vandalism in Hurricane Dennis, and I promptly fixedthem.
As I'm getting more invested on tropical cyclone articles, I've eventually heard and found out why some articles didn't have (XXXX year) in them - and it is because that they are primary topics. When I see some articles like Hurricane Linda (1997), which I thought they are primary topics (I eventually realized that they are not, and I have not requested moving these articles under WPTC banner ever since), I sought the same treatment in these kinds of articles that I thought was primary topics and thus I requestedmovesinmanyofthesesaidarticlesunder thatthought. I believed that these requests will garner support by most of the WPTC members (which I thought will think for the same), but never did I know that these requests gained overwhelming opposes, primarily from WPTC members - and they talked to me about it. Of course, I panicked and I have to withdraw some of these nominations.
That didn't stop me from editing more WPTC articles, and I started to do these requested moves again soon after. This is probably the most successful things I have ever done through my pre-WPTC membership career in the WPTC realm. After withdrawing some of these nominations, I began to work on a split of 1940–49 Pacific typhoon seasons article by starting the discussion on one in May 14. Two weeks later, as I said before, I startedrequestingmoreofthesenominationsin a batch on May 27 - which was wildly successful (only one of them were failed, and that was Tropical Storm Bret of 1993). In a month after these nominations, and with the consensus for split, I finally worked on the split itself. 1940 Pacific typhoon season and 1949 Pacific typhoon season has been split from the article much more earlier, with Hurricanehink creating an article for the 1940 season in May 23, 2014 and Typhoon2013 split the 1949 section from the article in December 19, 2016. I continued what Hurricanehink and Typhoon2013 has been doing, with copying content from the original article into the respective season articles. First, I revertedthemto theoriginal before Hurricanehink merged them. Afterwards, I copied the respective sectionsfrom the originalinto respective articles and removed the respective sections in the original article. From the IDs, you can notice that I did this not in order. Afterwards, I moved the original article into 1941–44 Pacific typhoon seasons without moving it's talk page, which I want to admit was a mistake and made a major ramifications (I even started a RfD, which should not happen) in my attempts to get it back without getting it's talk page removed later in October 2020. Once moving the article, I created redirects for the recently moved article (which includes 1941 Pacific typhoon season, 1942 Pacific typhoon season, 1943 Pacific typhoon season, and 1944 Pacific typhoon season, all of which eventually turned into articles), and quickly changed redirects of the respective storms into the newly restored articles. It was a massive effort that day on June 27, 2017, and the experience that I never forgotten.
After that month, I returned into requesting moves once again for the third time, riding on the recent wave of successes. I requested the moves of Hurricane Norman (1978) and Hurricane Liza. Hurricane Liza move request was successful but Norman did not. By that point, the frustration from WPTC members are showing up and by the time I requested moving Typhoon Ida (1958) into Typhoon Ida, I had to be stopped. I also moved Typhoon Pamela (1976) into Typhoon Pamela without any discussion, but you know my intentions by that point, and the move was soon reverted. I had a talk with Yellow Evan regarding these actions, and I soon relented, never requested any moves ever since. I didn't do much for the rest of the year - the most notable moves are moving disambiguation pages Tropical Storm Noru and Tropical Storm Banyan into Typhoon Noru and Typhoon Banyan, respectively. Moving on to the next year, I did not do much once again. Most of the activity that year was working on the most of Tropical Storm Son-Tinh (2018) article. Keep in mind that I plan to return working on that article as a part of 2018 Global FT efforts, and that happened because KN2731 is going to take a break for most of this year.
Onto the 2019, I did something that I think planted the seeds for my future MoTM run and vast WPTC growth in 2020. Most of the activity in general involves creating links to the future articles, but I also fixed redirects for most 1930s seasons and created redirects for the rest of 1960s decade for NIO basin. I planned something greater than that, however, but because I had to use my phone and not my laptop (it was broken) I wasn't able to do so. That plan was a factor leading to me joining the WPTC in July 2020 (after I realized about the benefits of joining the WikiProjects) and I began realizing the plan as soon as I got my laptop back. What I did for the most of August 2020 and September 2020 was mostly set in stone back in the previous year, if you don't notice that. If I didn't plan it back in the day, I don't think I would ever got that MoTM (it would have been Destroyeraa most likely).
That was a story. It is a long story. It took me pains to get myself established in WPTC, but now here I am. If anyone could have invited me back in the year 2018, I would have rejected it like CyclonicallyDeranged, whom I believe has been driven out of Wikipedia. But coming to this year, I realized the benefits of joining the WikiProjects and now, as said by Hurricanehink, I became a vital editor for WPTC.
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2021-03-01T20:26:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiCup_2021_March_newsletter-2021-03-01T20:26:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2021-03-01T20:26:00.000Z-WikiCup_2021_March_newsletter"],"text":"WikiCup 2021 March newsletter","linkableTitle":"WikiCup 2021 March newsletter"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2021-03-01T20:26:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiCup_2021_March_newsletter-2021-03-01T20:26:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2021-03-01T20:26:00.000Z-WikiCup_2021_March_newsletter"],"text":"WikiCup 2021 March newsletter","linkableTitle":"WikiCup 2021 March newsletter"}-->
Round 1 of the competition has finished; it was a high-scoring round with 21 contestants scoring more than 100 points. Everyone with a positive score moves on to Round 2, with 55 contestants qualifying. You will need to finish among the top thirty-two contestants in Round 2 if you are to qualify for Round 3. Our top scorers in Round 1 were:
Epicgenius led the field with a featured article, nine good articles and an assortment of other submissions, specialising on buildings and locations in New York, for a total of 945 points.
Bloom6132 was close behind with 896 points, largely gained from 71 "In the news" items, mostly recent deaths.
ImaginesTigers, who has been editing Wikipedia for less than a year, was in third place with 711 points, much helped by bringing League of Legends to featured article status, exemplifying how bonus points can boost a contestant's score.
Amakuru came next with 708 points, Kigali being another featured article that scored maximum bonus points.
Ktin, new to the WikiCup, was in fifth place with 523 points, garnered from 15 DYKs and 34 "In the news" items.
The Rambling Man scored 511 points, many from featured article candidate reviews and from football related DYKs.
Gog the Mild, last year's runner-up, came next with 498 points, from a featured article and numerous featured article candidate reviews.
Hog Farm, at 452, scored for a featured article, four good articles and a number of reviews.
Le Panini, another newcomer to the WikiCup, scored 438 for a featured article and three good articles.
Lee Vilenski, last year's champion, scored 332 points, from a featured article and various other sport-related topics.
These contestants, like all the others, now have to start again from scratch. In Round 1, contestants achieved eight featured articles, three featured lists and one featured picture, as well as around two hundred DYKs and twenty-seven ITNs. They completed 97 good article reviews, nearly double the 52 good articles they claimed. Contestants also claimed for 135 featured article and featured list candidate reviews. There is no longer a requirement to mention your WikiCup participation when undertaking these reviews.
Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is a good article candidate, a featured process, or something else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews.
If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:26, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2021-03-01T20:26:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2021-03-01T20:26:00.000Z-WikiCup_2021_March_newsletter","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2021-05-02T10:27:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiCup_2021_May_newsletter-2021-05-02T10:27:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2021-05-02T10:27:00.000Z-WikiCup_2021_May_newsletter"],"text":"WikiCup 2021 May newsletter","linkableTitle":"WikiCup 2021 May newsletter"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2021-05-02T10:27:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiCup_2021_May_newsletter-2021-05-02T10:27:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2021-05-02T10:27:00.000Z-WikiCup_2021_May_newsletter"],"text":"WikiCup 2021 May newsletter","linkableTitle":"WikiCup 2021 May newsletter"}-->
The second round of the 2021 WikiCup has now finished; it was a high-scoring round and contestants needed 61 points to advance to Round 3. There were some impressive efforts in the round, with the top eight contestants all scoring more than 400 points. A large number of the points came from the 12 featured articles and the 110 good articles achieved in total by contestants, as well as the 216 good article reviews they performed; the GAN backlog drive and the stay-at-home imperative during the COVID-19 pandemic may have been partially responsible for these impressive figures.
Our top scorers in Round 2 were:
The Rambling Man, with 2963 points from three featured articles, 20 featured article reviews, 37 good articles, 73 good article reviews, as well as 22 DYKs.
Epicgenius, with 1718 points from one featured article, 29 good articles, 16 DYKs and plenty of bonus points.
Bloom6132, with 990 points from 13 DYKs and 64 "In the news" items, mostly recent deaths.
Hog Farm, with 834 points from two featured articles, five good articles, 14 featured article reviews and 15 good article reviews.
Gog the Mild, with 524 points from two featured articles and four featured article reviews.
Lee Vilenski, with 501 points from one featured article, three good articles, six featured article reviews and 25 good article reviews.
Sammi Brie, with 485 points from four good articles, eight good article reviews and 27 DYKs, on US radio and television stations.
Ktin, with 436 points from four good articles, seven DYKs and 11 "In the news" items.
Please remember that DYKs cannot be claimed until they have appeared on the main page. As we enter the third round, any content promoted after the end of Round 2 but before the start of Round 3 can be claimed now, and anything you forgot to claim in Round 2 cannot! Remember too, that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them (except for at the end of each round, when you must claim them before the cut-off date/time). When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Judges: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and CwmhiraethMediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:27, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2021-05-02T10:27:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2021-05-02T10:27:00.000Z-WikiCup_2021_May_newsletter","replies":[]}}-->
The Hurricane Herald is the semi-regular newsletter of WikiProject Tropical Cyclones. The newsletter aims to provide in summary the recent activities and developments of the WikiProject, in addition to global tropical cyclone activity. The Hurricane Herald has been running since its first edition on June 4, 2006. If you wish to receive or discontinue subscription to this newsletter, please visit the member list. New members will automatically receive this newsletter. This issue of The Hurricane Herald covers all project related events from March 1–April 30, 2021. This edition's editors and authors are MarioJump83, Chicdat, Super Cyclonic Storm Corona, HurricaneEdgar, Dam222, AwesomeHurricaneBoss, LightandDark2000, LowercaseGuy (one of the editor's picks for Member of the Month), and our Members of the Month, CycloneFootball71, and CodingCyclone! Please visit this page and bookmark any suggestions of interest to you. This will help improve the newsletter and other cyclone-related articles. Past editions, including past MoTMs and SoTMs, can be viewed here.
After Destroyeraa became inactive (due to school), Hurricane Noah took on the role of the main judge of the Cyclone Cup, starting from the final week of Round 1. He clarified the rules, making it clear that completing a secondary review for Featured or Good Articles, or bringing an article to a peer review was not a way to get points; instead, you have to be the original reviewer of that article. However, for FAs, GAs, and A-Class articles, those who nominate and improve those articles to promotion will earn points for their promotion. This was done to make the Cyclone Cup's rules run closer to those of the WikiCup. In addition, the lengths of Rounds 3 and 4 were extended, to make them more uniform. Rounds 1–3 now last 2 & 1/2 months each, while Round 4 lasts for 2 months, pushing back the end of the Cyclone Cup to October 31. After Noah became the main judge, the first round of the Cyclone Cup ended at 11:59 p.m. UTC on March 31, 2021. LightandDark2000 was the leader in the first round, with 110 points, mainly due to him creating several new articles and getting Tropical Storm Rolf to GA status. MarioJump83 and HurricaneCovid also scored a lot of points this round, raking in 85 and 70 points, respectively. Jason Rees and CodingCyclone also qualified, with 15 and 10 points, respectively. Skarmory and CycloneFootball71 were eliminated for not having any points and also for not ranking in the top 5.
On April 6, 2021, WPTC was notified of an ongoing process to merge all meteorology projects (except WikiProject Climate Change) into one, WikiProject Weather. This was because many of the weather-related WikiProjects (excluding WPTC) have long suffered from inactivity and a lack of active members. Once merged, the project would run in a similar way to the Military History WikiProject, meaning that it would be a large WikiProject with a broad scope, and the individual WikiProjects would become large Task Forces within the broader WikiProject. The former WikiProjects will essentially continue to function as they do now; the biggest differences will be in the names of the former WikiProjects/new Task Forces and also how the relevant articles are categorized, in addition to more coordination and pooling of resources. The current Task Forces within each WikiProject will also continue to exist, as subdivisions under the larger, primary Task Forces within the Weather WikiProject. The merging process is expected to take a few months as of this issue (May 1, 2021). The actual merger will not be completed until everything is ready.
Over the past couple of months, WPTC and some of the other Weather WikiProjects went through a period of turmoil, mostly involving perennial edit-warring and hostile behavior from some users (including a handful from outside of the Weather WikiProjects). The negative environment created by these events led two WPTC members to retire (one of whom later opened up to returning) and several others to either go on WikiBreaks or withdraw in some other way. While the worst of the troubles have passed, the WikiProject is still recovering from the fallout. There will be more monitoring of users within and outside of the WikiProject to prevent incidents like these from recurring in the future.
Sennecaster found some extensive copyvio in quite a few articles under the scope of WPTC, with quite a few coming from WPac articles. She notified the project in late April, and there are a few editors working on finding, removing and reporting copyvio. All articles must be checked as part of this sweep. If you are able to help, your service would be greatly appreciated, Please note that you must contact Sennecaster or someone else who is experienced in fixing copyvio before starting. In addition, please get Sennecaster's consent before starting, as the project is going on in her userspace.
In this edition of Hurricane Herald, I (MarioJump83, one of the Hurricane Herald editors) am going to pick Akbermamps and LowercaseGuy. Both of them contributed to nearly all of the new articles since the publishing of the last issue (and also they contributed to the last issue itself). All of these articles primarily covered the Western Pacific basin, but also they worked on missing Tropical cyclones in xxxx articles and Southern Hemisphere articles. They both were driving factors in some of the greatest growth the WPTC has ever seen since Issues 42, 43, and 44. Both of them are hard workers, who remain civil, and treat others with kindness, despite hardships. Akbermamps also has reverted many nonconstructive edits from many different articles, plus they have made many great edits to tropical cyclone articles, as said above. LowercaseGuy also has made many great edits, per above, plus they have kept the newsletter up to date with all of the new article creations, new GA's, and A-class articles within the project. Because of this, I can only say that I am very proud of them!
Since the last issue of this newsletter, I have noticed that there is an uptick of activity involving 2018 Global FT topic recently. Hurricane Noah came back from almost-retirement, then afterwards improved Hurricane Olivia (2018) into A-class, 2018 Pacific hurricane season within striking distance of it and Timeline of the 2018 Pacific hurricane season potentially became the second featured list we are going to have this year. Meanwhile, I have been focusing all of my efforts in WPTC at improving Cyclone Owen, by Chicdat, into GA status and end all drama between him and all other WPTC editors. Two MoTMs that I have personally picked, Akbermamps and LowercaseGuy, joined the fray (not joining us officially) and improved some 2018 Pacific typhoon season articles that I have created, including the creation of both two articles listed above (and as of right now, Akbermamps is building up Timeline of the 2018 Pacific typhoon season article in his sandbox). I'm very glad to see this happening and I hope this newly found activity could be kept up in the next two months. During these months, I am hoping that Noah might make efforts at improving Hurricane Bud (2018) towards FA eventually. MarioJump83!
We are recruiting
If you are interested in writing new articles, promoting articles to GA, or helping with the FAC review process for the Global 2018 FT project, please reach out to LightandDark2000 or any other member of the 2018 FT task force.
Citation needed:
Make sure articles such as Pacific hurricane and Tropical cyclones in year articles are cited properly. (LightandDark2000 has provided a tutorial for citing sources in his opinion piece.)
Expand:
Newer tropical cyclone intensity list articles, Seasonal summaries and global condition sections for nearly every tropical cyclones by year articles, Pacific hurricane season timelines and earlier season articles in 1950s, 1941/1942/1943/1944 Pacific typhoon seasons, Tropical cyclones in Indonesia, most of the List of named storms articles, and most of the WPAC Storm articles created in August and September 2020
Cyclone Niran originated from a developing tropical low off the coast of Queensland on February 27. Afterward, the system slowly began to strengthen, while making a slow clockwise loop, bringing heavy flooding to parts of Queensland. On March 1, the system strengthened into a Category 1 tropical cyclone on the Australian region basin scale, and was given the name Niran by the BoM. On March 3, Niran began to undergo rapid intensification as it began accelerating away from the Australian coast, towards the southeast. On March 5, Niran crossed over into the FMS's area of responsibility, in the South Pacific basin. Soon afterward, the cyclone reached its peak intensity as a Category 5 tropical cyclone on both the Australian region scale and the Saffir–Simpson scale (SSHWS), with maximum 10-minute sustained winds of 205 km/h (125 mph), maximum 1-minute sustained winds of 260 km/h (160 mph), and a central minimum pressure of 931 millibars (27.5 inHg). Several hours later, Niran underwent an eyewall replacement cycle and encountered wind shear, which caused the storm to begin weakening. The storm continued moving towards the southeast at a rapid pace, and on March 6, the storm struck the island of Grande Terre in New Caledonia, as a Category 3-equivalent tropical cyclone on the SSHWS, although the storm's eye stayed offshore. On March 6, Niran transitioned into an extratropical cyclone, and two days later, Niran was absorbed into another larger extratropical storm to the south. Niran caused at least $200 million (2021 USD) in damages, the vast majority of which came from banana crop damage in Queensland. No deaths were reported from the storm.
On March 19, the BoM began monitoring a developing tropical low to the south of Timor, which they designated as 22U. On April 3, the system fully developed into a tropical low. For the next couple of days, the system made a slow counterclockwise loop over a part Indonesia and over Timor, gradually strengthening as it did so, causing torrential floods that killed at least 229 people. On April 4, the system strengthened into a Category 1 tropical cyclone on the Australian region scale and was named Seroja by TCWC Jakarta. On April 5, Seroja began moving southwestward, away from Indonesia. The storm encountered wind shear during this time, but the storm maintained tropical cyclone intensity. On April 7, Seroja began closely interacting with Tropical Low 23U to the northeast, which later became Cyclone Odette, as a result of the Fujiwhara effect. The two storms began closely interacting on April 8, as the two storms drew closer to each other. The interaction initially caused both storms to weaken, though Seroja eventually restrengthen and 23U strengthened into Tropical Cyclone Odette later that day. However, soon afterward, Seroja became the stronger storm and begen to absorb Odette into its circulation. On April 10, Seroja absorbed Odette, before turning to the southeast and strengthening again. The system continued stregthening up until landfall, and the system made landfall on April 12 near Gregory, Western Australia, at peak intensity, as a Category 3 severe tropical cyclone on the Australian region scale and a Category 1-equivalent tropical cyclone on the Saffir–Simpson scale. Afterward, Seroja weakened as it moved inland, and the system transitioned into an extratropical storm, before emerging into the Great Australian Bight. Later that day, Seroja was absorbed by a larger extratropical cyclone to the south. Seroja killed at least 229 people and left another 102 missing, making it the third-deadliest tropical cyclone recorded in the Australian region basin. The storm also caused over $490.7 million (2021 USD) in damages.
Western Pacific – On March 14, a short-lived tropical depression formed near the Philippines, before dissipating later that day. On April 12, Typhoon Surigae, the fourth depression, second named storm, and first typhoon of the 2021 Pacific typhoon season, formed on April 12. It began a period of rapid intensification on April 16, undergoing a brief eyewall replacement cycle, and reaching its peak intensity on April 17, becoming the most intense typhoon to form in the month of April. At its peak, the storm had a minimum central pressure of 895 mbar (895.0 hPa; 26.43 inHg), maximum 10-minute sustained winds of 220 km/h (140 mph), and maximum 1-minute sustained winds of 305 km/h (190 mph), making the storm a powerful Category 5-equivalent super typhoon on the Saffir–Simpson scale (SSHWS). Afterward, the storm underwent two eyewall replacement cycles, after which the storm became annular by April 20, with a symmetrical shape and a large eye, while moving northwestward, off the coast of the Philippines. Afterward, the storm gradually began to weaken, and its structure began to degrade on April 22, as the system turned northeastward. Weakening accelerated after that, as the storm encountered more unfavorable conditions. Surigae transitioned into a subtropical storm on April 23, before becoming extratropical on the next day. On April 26, Surigae's extratropical remnant underwent explosive intensification as it accelerated northeastward, reaching an extratropical peak of 944 mbar (944.0 hPa; 27.88 inHg) on April 27, as a powerful hurricane-force extratropical cyclone. Afterward, Surigae's remnant gradually weakened, as it turned eastward. On April 30, Surigae's low-pressure center dissipated and was replaced by a new one later that day, marking a center reformation, with the new low-pressure center quickly dominating the storm. Afterward, Surigae's remnants moved into the Gulf of Alaska, before slowing down and turning to the northwest, while rapidly weakening. On May 2, the storm was absorbed into another extratropical cyclone near the Aleutian Islands, on May 2. Late on May 6, this storm was absorbed into yet another extratropical cyclone to the southeast, within the Gulf of Alaska. Surigae brought tropical storm-force winds to Micronesia and Palau and grazed the Philippines as a powerful storm, causing over $10.45 million in damages in U.S. dollars and running the cargo ship LCU Cebu Great Ocean aground, killing 10 people and leaving 8 others missing.
North Indian Ocean – On April 2, Depression BOB 01, the first storm of the season, developed over the Andaman Sea. For the next couple of days, the storm slowly moved northward, towards Myanmar, before dissipating on the next day.
Australian region – Cyclone Marian moved into the South-West Indian Ocean basin on March 1, before moving back into the Australian region basin on the next day. The storm gradually weakened while moving southeastward, before becoming an extratropical cyclone on March 9. Cyclone Niran, which had formed on February 27, peaked as a Category 5 severe tropical cyclone on March 5, before exiting the basin into the South Pacific basin soon afterward. The storm damaged many of the banana crops in Queensland, causing at least $180 million (2021 USD) in damages in Australia. During the remainder of the month of March, Tropical Lows 18U, 19U, 20U, and 21U formed, but each of those storms dissipated without ever having any significant impacts. On April 2, Tropical Low 23U formed around Indonesia, followed by Tropical Low 22U on April 3; these storms developed into Cyclones Odette and Seroja, respectively. 23U gradually moved southward, before interacting with Cyclone Seroja on April 8, and strengthened into Cyclone Odette later that day. However, the storm was gradually drawn into Seroja's circulation, and on April 10, Odette was absorbed into Seroja. Tropical Low 22U made a slow counterclockwise loop over Indonesia and over Timor from April 2 to 5, causing destructive flooding, and killing at least 229 people. The system strengthened into Tropical Cyclone Seroja on April 4. On April 5, Seroja began to leave Indonesia and moved southwestward. From April 8 to 10, Seroja interacted with the nearby Cyclone Odette, before absorbing the latter on April 10, and turning southeastward. Soon afterward, Seroja strengthened further into a Category 1-equivalent tropical cyclone, strengthening all the way until its landfall near Gregory, Western Australia on April 11. The system became extratropical on April 12 and re-emerged over open water, before being absorbed into another extratropical cyclone later that day. On April 9, a short-lived tropical low formed, before dissipating later that day. On April 23, yet another short-lived tropical low developed, before dissipating on the next day. This was the last storm of the season. The season officially ended on April 30.
South-West Indian Ocean – On March 1, Cyclone Marian briefly entered the basin. During that time, MFR decided to defer advisories to the BoM, as the cyclone was expected to re-enter the Australian Region within a short period of time. On March 2, it exited the South-West Indian Ocean basin. The same day, the precursor to Cyclone Habana formed as well as an invest which would become Cyclone Iman. Habana was named 2 days later, and Iman was named on March 7. Cyclone Habana stayed out to sea and did not cause any known damage or deaths. It was quite long lived, spanning 2 weeks and reaching Intense Tropical Cyclone (and Category 4-equivalent) intensity. On the other hand, Cyclone Iman made landfall in Madagascar and Réunion, causing moderate rainfall in the former country and flash floods and heavy winds in the latter. Tropical Depression 15, a brief storm, also formed in late March. After a period of inactivity, Moderate Tropical Storm Jobo was named on April 20. For the next several days, the storm tracked westward, before weakening into a remnant low on April 24 and making landfall on Tanzania shortly afterward. The storm dissipated later that day. On April 30, the season ended for most of the basin, except for the region around Mauritius and Seychelles, for which the season will end on May 15.
South Pacific – On March 5, Tropical Depression 11F formed to the southeast of Port Vila, Vanuatu, before dissipating on the next day. On March 5, Cyclone Niran also entered the basin from the Australian region basin, as a Category 5 severe tropical cyclone. The storm gradually weakened as it quickly moved to the southeast, before striking the island of Grande Terre in New Caledonia as a Category 3-equivalent tropical cyclone on March 6. Afterward, the storm raced off towards the southeast and became extratropical later that day, before dissipating on March 8. Niran did at least $20 million in damages in New Caledonia, bringing the storm's damage total to at least $200 million. The storm did not have any reported deaths. On April 9, a tropical low entered the basin from the Australian region basin, which became Tropical Depression 13F. For the next couple of days, the system moved southeastward, making landfall on New Caledonia in the process, and strengthening after it moved back over open waters. However, the system rapidly weakened on April 11 and dissipated later that day. On April 24, the JTWC began monitoring a subtropical system in the eastern part of the basin, which they classified as Subtropical Cyclone 96P. The system was short-lived, as it dissipated late on the next day. No more storms developed in the basin that month. On April 30, the season officially ended.
South Atlantic – According to the Brazilian Navy, an extratropical system transitioned into a subtropical depression on April 19. On April 20, the system strengthened into a subtropical storm and was named Potira. The system slowly moved towards the southeast, before dissipating on April 25.
In this edition of Hurricane Herald, we present CycloneFootball71 and CodingCyclone as the Members of the Month. Both users joined Wikipedia and WPTC in the year 2020, and they helped us navigate into a better place during the COVID-19 pandemic and during the WPTC conflicts in 2020 and 2021. Their participation lifted and maintained our spirits during the tense situations and what's happening in the world. CycloneFootball71 is the kindest WPTC member we have ever seen, actively giving out barnstars and writing out statements that can be considered as "motivational", never targeting anyone, while also making contributions to articles, and participating in talk-page discussions, and occasionally, reverting vandalism. CodingCyclone, meanwhile, gave Wiki-project Tropical Cyclones the first featured list in years, and she helps out with wording, current cyclones, and other neglected timelines, and all around is kind, and thoughtful to everyone within the Wikipedia community. She is someone who has matured to become a great, and experienced editor here. We thank her for all of her contributions, and hope she continues to keep up the great work, and kindness.
Unfortunately, 2020 was not a kind year for the two of them, particularly for CycloneFootball71, as he suffered from numerous illnesses, a few injuries, the loss of a friend (offwiki) and he retired (though he came back, thankfully) numerous times; these troubles even continued into 2021. Meanwhile, CodingCyclone stayed, but she entered a semi-WikiBreak, due to real life matters she had to attend to. However, both of them are editing at full speed now, and helped us realize what 2021 should be, full of hope and a better year than 2020 was.
New WikiProject Members since the last newsletter
More information can be found here. This list lists members who have joined/rejoined the WikiProject since the release of the last issue. Sorted chronologically.
To our new members: welcome to the project, and happy editing! Feel free to check the to-do list at the bottom right of the newsletter for things that you might want to work on. To our veteran members: thank you for your edits and your tireless contributions!
JavaHurricane, one of the prominent Wikipedia rollbackers since 2019, decided to quit WikiProject Tropical cyclones in April 7, 2021 after series of arguments regarding how the merger of Tropical storms Amanda and Cristobal was handled (though this was later resolved). This followed a series of events that included numerous edit wars, hostile interactions (involving both members and non-members of the Weather WikiProjects), incompetence issues, and trouble dealing with a number of serial vandals. These issues added on more and more stress to some of our members, with the botched handling of the Amanda/Cristobal merger being the last straw, which culminated in several WPTC members, especially the younger ones, to leave the project. Destroyeraa decided to fully retire from Wikipedia, but LightandDark2000 managed to get him consider rejoining WPTC after a lengthy series of off-wiki discussions, contingent upon the WikiProject improving its conduct. A MoTM of this edition, CycloneFootball71 also decided to retire, following the decision of Destroyeraa to quit WPTC, but quickly reconsidered and instead took an indefinite WikiBreak, which later became a Semi-WikiBreak. LightandDark2000 himself also considered quitting from WPTC and leaving Wikipedia entirely (since WPTC activities are his primary reason for being on Wikipedia in the first place), but he decided to stay for now (unless things continue to grow worse, in which case, a full retirement as a registered user is likely). Another MoTM, CodingCyclone, went on a semi-WikiBreak instead of quitting like some of others did.
Although the worst of the turmoil seems to be over now, WPTC is still slowly recovering from the damage. However, it is clear, unfortunately, that JavaHurricane will not return to the project, due to the loss of faith and time. We hope that this will never happen again. To JavaHurricane himself: thank you. Thanks for all the edits you've made in 2020 and in 2021. You are one of the building blocks that led to the WPTC revival last year. Without you, we would have had more difficulty combating some of the LTAs we've recently dealt with. You've made plenty of quality improvements and also carried out a decent amount of anti-vandalism activities. If you ever wish to rejoin the project, you will always be welcome here. We wish you luck in your future endeavors.
Featured Content
From March 1 to April 30, one featured list was promoted.
Tropical Storm Rolf, also known as Tropical Storm 01M, was an unusual Mediterranean tropical storm that brought flooding to Italy, France, Spain, and Switzerland in November 2011. Rolf originated from an extratropical system near western France on November 4. For the next few days, Rolf moved eastward into the Mediterranean Sea, before making a slow clockwise loop off the coast of France. Despite the generally unfavorable conditions in the Mediterranean Sea, Rolf transitioned into a subtropical depression on November 7, before becoming a tropical storm later that day and turning northeastward. On November 8, Rolf reached its peak intensity, with 1-minute sustained winds peaking at 85 km/h (50 mph, 45 kn) and a minimum central pressure of 991 mb (29.3 inHg). During the next day, the storm turned westward and made landfall on the island of Île du Levant, in France, and soon afterward, near Hyères in southeastern France. Following its second landfall, Rolf quickly weakened, dissipating on November 10. Rolf was the first tropical cyclone ever to be officially monitored by the NOAA in the Mediterranean Sea.
Rolf caused widespread flooding across southwestern Europe, especially in France and Italy, with the majority of the damage from the storm occurring in those two countries. Torrential rainfall from Rolf caused multiple rivers to overflow their banks in France and Italy, flooding multiple cities and resulting in extensive property damage. The storm forced numerous schools and businesses to close temporarily, and also caused significant damage to 300 farms in France. Floodwaters from Rolf's rainfall also cut the power to over 8,000 customers and necessitated thousands of rescues, in addition to forcing thousands of evacuations. The storm also caused the largest flood event seen in Gipuzkoa, in northern Spain since 1983. Rolf killed 12 people, and the storm was also the costliest Mediterranean tropical-like cyclone in the 2010s, with the storm causing at least $1.25 billion (2011 USD, €925 million) in damages.
Current assessment table
Assessments valid as of this printing. Depending on when you may be viewing this newsletter, the table may be outdated. See here for the latest, most up to date statistics. As of this issue, there are 166 featured articles and 70 featured lists. There are 135 A-class articles, and 1,012 good articles. There are only 120 B-class articles, perhaps because because most articles of that quality already passed a GA review. There are 416 C-class articles, 832 start-class articles, and 200 stub-class articles, with 27 lists, and 7 current articles. These figures mean that slightly more than half of the project is rated a GA or better. Typhoon Warren was the 1000th GA in the project.
The following is the current progress on the three milestone goals set by the WikiProject as of this publishing. They can be found, updated, at the main WikiProject page.
How to Cite Sources on Tropical Cyclone Articles, by LightandDark2000
In my years of experiences here on WPTC (and on Wikipedia, in general), I've noticed that citing sources properly is a skillset that many editors are lacking in. While a good number of the experienced editors are familiar with how to fill out citations on Wikipedia, this is something that the most of the newer editors struggle with, especially those who have never written a research paper before. Given the influx of new members in WPTC over the past year, I've decided to write a simple tutorial on how to properly complete citations in tropical cyclone articles.
First of all, lets start with a standard citation template. This format will be used for the vast majority of citations on tropical cyclone articles: <ref>{{cite web|url=|title=|website=|author=
|publisher=|location=|date=|access-date=}}</ref>
Every citation template is enclosed by the "<ref></ref>" tags. Since we are using a reference template instead of a bare citation, we also have double brackets enclosing the interior of the template. We are citing a web page, so we will enter in "cite web" after the first set of brackets. You can either type out the entire template manually, copy and paste the citation template from above, or use a citation tool (if you know how to use those).
To cite this source, first, create or paste the citation template above right after the chunk where you want to cite it (immediately after the period, comma, or whatever punctuation mark is present). Copy the website url (https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2020/al09/al092020.update.08040316.shtml) and paste it after "url=". For NHC and CPHC advisories, please DO NOT EVER use the live/refresh links. Those links are unstable and change each time a new advisory is issued. Only use the links from the Advisory Archives, such as this archive for 2020.
Next, copy the title of the advisory and paste it after "title=". The advisory/discussion titles for NHC publications are near the top of the page, below the page heading and below the first lines of text identifying the publication. For NHC publications, the title is located on the third line of text, on the second "paragraph" or group of text. The title for this advisory is "Hurricane Isaias Tropical Cyclone Update".
If the source is in a language other than English, then we will also add the "|language=" parameter and specify the language. However, if the source is in English, then this parameter isn't needed.
Then, enter in the website title or url for the "website=". For most citations, we use either the "website=" or "publisher=" parameter instead of using both of them; however, we can use them both if the title of the website is significantly different from the name of the publisher. In this example, the website url is "nhc.noaa.gov", so we would enter in this url address after "website=" if we were to use this parameter.
After that, enter in the name of the author. We either use the "Last name, First name (and middle initial)" format, or the "Full name (first and last names)" format. Use only one format for consistency. For this example, we will use the "full name" format, as it would naturally appear on print. If there are more than one author, we would add a number after the "author=" parameter, such as "author1=". There are three authors for this advisory, whose last names are: Brown, Zelinsky, and Beven. Simply entering in the last name is NOT ENOUGH. We need their full names. For the NHC and NWS employees, you may need to do a little bit of research to find out their full names (or ask another more experienced editor here on WPTC), which isn't that difficult. A quick Google search shows that their full names are: Daniel Brown, David Zelinsky, and Jack Beven. So then, fill out the author portion of the citation template as follows: "author1=Daniel Brown|author2=David Zelinsky|author3=Jack Beven".
Then, enter in the name of the publisher, at "publisher=". For our example, this would be the National Hurricane Center. Since this is an official advisory/bulletin involving a government agency/organization, we also need to fill out the "location=" parameter to indicate the location of the agency's headquarters (we don't need this parameter for citing standard news articles or webpages). The NHC is based in Miami, Florida, so we would fill out the next part of the citation as "location=Miami, Florida".
After you have completed the previous steps, enter in both the date and the access-date. We use either the "Month Day, Year" format or the "Day Month Year" format for our citations (the name of the month is fully written out). For the sake of consistency, please use ONLY ONE format. It should remain consistent throughout the article. For this example, we will use the "Month Day, Year" format used in American English, since the NHC's areas of responsibility primarily involve the United States and the Western Hemisphere. The "date" is the date on which the publication or article was published. We use UTC time to determine the date. The advisory was published on 11:15 EDT on August 3, 2020. This is roughly equivalent to 03:15 UTC on August 4, 2020, so the date is "August 4, 2020". The accessdate is the day on which YOU accessed or read the publication. Let's say that you read the advisory on August 6, UTC time. Then, the accessdate would be "August 6, 2020". The dates for this citation should be filled out in this manner: "date=August 4, 2020|access-date=August 6, 2020"
Once you have done all of this, your completed citation should have the following code: <ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2020/al09/
al092020.update.08040316.shtml |title=Hurricane Isaias Tropical Cyclone Update|website=nhc.noaa.gov|author1=Daniel Brown|author2=David Zelinsky|author3=Jack Beven|publisher=National Hurricane Center|location=Miami, Florida|date=August 4, 2020|access-date=August 6, 2020|language=en-US}}</ref>
With this tutorial, hopefully you now know how to properly cite sources within tropical cyclone articles. Properly citing sources is a crucial skill on Wikipedia. It allows you to make complete, professional references that can be accessed and reused by just about any other editor. Additionally, creating incomplete or improper citations forces other more experienced users to clean up after you, which not only wastes time, but also prevents an article from becoming a Good Article or Featured Article until these issues are completely resolved. Citing sources is an important skill and one that every experienced editor is expected to master. Citing sources takes time to learn, so don't be discouraged if you don't fully master the art at the beginning. As with everything else in life, new skills require "practice" to perfect, and as you cite more and more sources, you'll find that citing sources becomes easier and faster for you. I hope you find this guide useful in your journey on Wikipedia. May it help mold you into a superb writer, like many other experienced editors who have come before you. Best of luck, and happy editing! ~ LightandDark2000 🌀
^Daniel Brown; David Zelinsky; Jack Beven (August 4, 2020). "Hurricane Isaias Tropical Cyclone Update". nhc.noaa.gov. Miami, Florida: National Hurricane Center. Retrieved August 6, 2020.
Destroyeraa registered his account on Wikipedia in January 2020. He gained experience like all of us, and received several user rights in the process. He improved several articles to GA status, the first being Hurricane Dolores (2015). He made WikiProject Tropical cyclones a good place to be. He made some mistakes, of course, but learned from them quickly. But by 2021, real life seemed to be catching up to Destroyeraa. He went into periods of semi-wikibreaks. His editing became more sporadic. He has not edited since March 3, 2021. WikiProject Tropical cyclones has experienced plenty of turmoil since then, especially in late March and early April. Some users have been very hostile. There has been copyright problems. Drama is being created. With the exception of a few remarks by LightandDark2000 on-wiki, the project has not heard from him for a long time. I wish that he would come back, and I miss him. When Destroyeraa went, it seems that the short revival of WikiProject Tropical cyclones went with him as well. I came as the renewal of WPTC was beginning, so I knew no other state of the project.
To Destroyeraa himself: Please come back. You made the WikiProject a good place to be. I miss you so much; you were like a real life friend. ~ 🐔ChicdatBawk to me!
Destroyeraa was the person who invited me to the project. Like many others, his hard work and diligence made him a role model to me. Without him, I probably wouldn't be where I am today. He gave me advice when I was trying to improve Hurricane Fran (which I never completed, but would like to do as an honor to him) and helped me realize some of my earlier edits were a bit CIR-y and disruptive (albeit unintentionally). He was always unfailingly civil and helped other editors when they were down. He also created the Cyclone Cup which is actually really fun and something that I personally would never have thought of, and is helping to drive some people to create and improve more articles. To me, he was a symbol of the rebirth of WPTC. When he left, it seemed as though that age disappeared. I know that real life always takes precedence over Wikipedia, but hopefully he can figure out how to balance the two and come back soon. CodingCyclone!🌀📘
Destroyeraa has had a profound effect on the WPTC. He has been so helpful and kind throughout his time on Wikipedia, and I want to thank him for that. He has done so much for us throughout his time here, and Wikipedia has not been the same for the project since he left. He has helped me through lots, during some very difficult times, and he has been a great friend. He helped me create my first Opinion piece ever, which helped me get into editing these newsletters for the editors of this project. Despite some mistakes, he overcame these and became even better than before, and he really inspired me to improve myself in the realm of editing tropical cyclones. He did so much for this project, and me and the rest of this Wikiproject want to thank him for all that he has done. I am not sure what else to say, as Chicdat and CodingCyclone said everything that was in my mind. However, he was a great friend. Destroyeraa, you will be missed here on Wikipedia. I hope one day you may return and regain your faith in WPTC again, but for now, I only hope and wish for the absolute best for your life. Thank you again. 🌀CycloneFootball71🏈 |sandbox
Destroyeraa brought me to speed during my initial WPTC tenure as SMB99thx, since I was not that active in my first years and also not aware of Wikipedia's changing guards, like newer users having advanced permissions so quickly, having many user scripts, very communicative on-and-off-wiki (i.e. using Discord), and so much more that I don't understand back when I first joined in WPTC. By learning from him, eventually, I did have the same advanced permissions like his up to last month, having many user-scripts, as well as using a custom theme for Wikipedia, which is not Vector, and its very cool! Without him, I may have been going into a path Chicdat is currently taking right now, as Chicdat wasn't able to stay as a page mover and a rollbacker early in his Wikipedia career, then got into several troubles which led me into adopting him. Now, I am going to give him lessons that I learned from Destroyeraa himself. Other than that, I don't have anything much to say about him, but I hope he's back again to help me once more, and bring me further growth as an editor going forward, which could potentially assist me at shepherding Chicdat into a better place. MarioJump83!
The others above have pretty much captured what I would like to say, and since Destroyeraa and I have stayed in contact off-wiki, I'll make this brief. Destroyeraa was a one-of-a-kind. I've been here for 12 years now, and I have to say that I've rarely ever come across someone like him; even less so in real life. The work he has done in just one year on Wikipedia (as a registered user) is absolutely astounding; it took me 6 years for my editing to reach that level of professionalism. I have not seen anyone like him show up on WPTC since Hurricane Noah joined in 2017. He is really smart, and he is also one of the nicest people I've ever met. And he's a very good friend as well. Destroyeraa, I bet you were able to guess most of what I said here, but you should know that you're a real gem. Those of us here miss you, and there are others as well. And I did tell you that your absence would be felt, didn't I? Regardless of what you think, what you do here does and will affect us. I'm very happy that you've decided to come back this summer, once you get out of school. I hope to see you around the place then. Your friend, LightandDark2000 🌀
Hi, Dylan620. I'm just posting to let you know that Timeline of the 1996 Atlantic hurricane season – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for July 9. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 00:33, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2021-06-15T00:33:00.000Z","author":"Giants2008","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Giants2008-2021-06-15T00:33:00.000Z-TFL_notification","replies":[]}}-->
Best wishes, CAPTAIN RAJU(T)12:07, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2021-06-20T12:07:00.000Z","author":"CAPTAIN RAJU","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-CAPTAIN_RAJU-2021-06-20T12:07:00.000Z-Happy_Birthday!_2","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2021-07-02T09:29:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiCup_2021_July_newsletter-2021-07-02T09:29:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2021-07-02T09:29:00.000Z-WikiCup_2021_July_newsletter"],"text":"WikiCup 2021 July newsletter","linkableTitle":"WikiCup 2021 July newsletter"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2021-07-02T09:29:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiCup_2021_July_newsletter-2021-07-02T09:29:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2021-07-02T09:29:00.000Z-WikiCup_2021_July_newsletter"],"text":"WikiCup 2021 July newsletter","linkableTitle":"WikiCup 2021 July newsletter"}-->
The third round of the 2021 WikiCup has now come to an end. Each of the sixteen contestants who made it into the fourth round had at least 294 points, and our top six scorers all had over 600 points. They were:
The Rambling Man, with 1825 points from 3 featured articles, 44 featured article reviews, 14 good articles, 30 good article reviews and 10 DYKs. In addition, he completed a 34-article good topic on the EFL Championship play-offs.
Epicgenius, a New York specialist, with 1083 points from 2 featured article reviews, 18 good articles, 30 DYKs and plenty of bonus points.
Bloom6132, with 869 points from 11 DYKs, all with bonus points, and 54 "In the news" items, mostly covering people who had recently died.
Gog the Mild, with 817 points from 3 featured articles on historic battles in Europe, 5 featured article reviews and 3 good articles.
Hog Farm, with 659 points from 2 featured articles and 2 good articles on American Civil War battles, 18 featured article reviews, 2 good articles, 6 good article reviews and 4 DYKs.
BennyOnTheLoose, a snooker specialist and new to the Cup, with 647 points from a featured article, 2 featured article reviews, 6 good articles, 6 good article reviews and 3 DYKs.
In round three, contestants achieved 19 featured articles, 7 featured lists, 106 featured article reviews, 72 good articles, 1 good topic, 62 good article reviews, 165 DYKs and 96 ITN items. We enter the fourth round with scores reset to zero; any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them (one contestant in round 3 lost out because of this). When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Judges: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and CwmhiraethCwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:29, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2021-07-02T09:29:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2021-07-02T09:29:00.000Z-WikiCup_2021_July_newsletter","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2021-09-02T13:01:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiCup_2021_September_newsletter-2021-09-02T13:01:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2021-09-02T13:01:00.000Z-WikiCup_2021_September_newsletter"],"text":"WikiCup 2021 September newsletter","linkableTitle":"WikiCup 2021 September newsletter"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2021-09-02T13:01:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiCup_2021_September_newsletter-2021-09-02T13:01:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2021-09-02T13:01:00.000Z-WikiCup_2021_September_newsletter"],"text":"WikiCup 2021 September newsletter","linkableTitle":"WikiCup 2021 September newsletter"}-->
The fourth round of the competition has finished with over 500 points being required to qualify for the final round. It was a hotly competitive round with two contestants, The Rambling Man and Epicgenius, each scoring over 3000 points, and six contestants scoring over 1000. All but one of the finalists achieved one or more FAs during the round, the exception being Bloom6132 who demonstrated that 61 "in the news" items produces an impressive number of points. Other contestants who made it to the final are Gog the Mild, Lee Vilenski, BennyOnTheLoose, Amakuru and Hog Farm. However, all their points are now swept away and everyone starts afresh in the final round.
Round 4 saw the achievement of 18 featured articles and 157 good articles. Bilorv scored for a 25-article good topic on Black Mirror but narrowly missed out on qualifying for the final round. There was enthusiasm for FARs, with 89 being performed, and there were 63 GARs and around 100 DYKs during the round. As we start round 5, we say goodbye to the eight competitors who didn't quite make it to the final round; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia, and we hope you will join us again next year. For other contestants, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them.
If you are concerned that your nomination, whether it be for a good article, a featured process, or anything else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:01, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2021-09-02T13:01:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2021-09-02T13:01:00.000Z-WikiCup_2021_September_newsletter","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-CAPTAIN_RAJU-2021-09-15T11:30:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Happy_First_Edit_Day!_2-2021-09-15T11:30:00.000Z","replies":["c-CAPTAIN_RAJU-2021-09-15T11:30:00.000Z-Happy_First_Edit_Day!_2"],"text":"Happy First Edit Day!","linkableTitle":"Happy First Edit Day! 2"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-CAPTAIN_RAJU-2021-09-15T11:30:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Happy_First_Edit_Day!_2-2021-09-15T11:30:00.000Z","replies":["c-CAPTAIN_RAJU-2021-09-15T11:30:00.000Z-Happy_First_Edit_Day!_2"],"text":"Happy First Edit Day!","linkableTitle":"Happy First Edit Day! 2"}-->
Hey, Dylan620. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day!CAPTAIN RAJU(T)11:30, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2021-09-15T11:30:00.000Z","author":"CAPTAIN RAJU","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-CAPTAIN_RAJU-2021-09-15T11:30:00.000Z-Happy_First_Edit_Day!_2","replies":[]}}-->
Hello,
I'm Beardbrarian. I'm part of a small team of Iowa State University library staff, along with HematISU, that are working on Wikipedia, following the guidelines laid out in Wikipedia:The_Wikipedia_Library/Cultural_Professionals. The edit HematISU made yesterday, was to future-proof an existing citation to one of our finding aids by changing it from a direct link to an Archival Resource Key or ARK. Over the years, our library has hosted finding aids at various URLs, some older links from Wikipedia point to www.add.lib.iastate.edu and are now broken because that URL has changed. The prior Kniskern Mather link pointed to findingaids.lib.iastate.edu, which is no longer the current home of our finding aids. While the link currently works, the platform it links to will be retired eventually. The link HematISU added points to the current platform for finding aids, cardinal.lib.iastate.edu, which will almost certainly be replaced by something else in the future, if past practices hold. When that happens we will update the ARK to point to the new location and the ARK, but the link in Wikipedia will not need to be changed.
The purpose of updating Wikipedia links to ISU library resources to ARKs is to reduce dead links in Wikipedia and to reduce the burden on Wikipedia editors to update external links as URLs change. We are only making such changes for links to resources managed by the ISU library. This is very similar to the use of DOIs throughout Wikipedia to link to resources.
May we restore HematISU's edit?
Beardbrarian (talk) 14:53, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2021-10-27T14:53:00.000Z","author":"Beardbrarian","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Beardbrarian-2021-10-27T14:53:00.000Z-Katharine_Kniskern_Mather_link","replies":["c-Dylan620-2021-10-27T18:55:00.000Z-Beardbrarian-2021-10-27T14:53:00.000Z","c-Dylan620-2021-10-27T19:08:00.000Z-Beardbrarian-2021-10-27T14:53:00.000Z","c-Beardbrarian-2021-10-27T22:27:00.000Z-Beardbrarian-2021-10-27T14:53:00.000Z"]}}-->
@Beardbrarian: Absolutely — you didn't need to ask my permission at all. Please accept my apologies for the error. --Dylan620 (talk) 18:55, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2021-10-27T18:55:00.000Z","author":"Dylan620","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Dylan620-2021-10-27T18:55:00.000Z-Beardbrarian-2021-10-27T14:53:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->
@Beardbrarian: As a matter of fact, I have just restored the edit myself. In the time since I was last an active user on Wikipedia, I clearly have become a little too wary of URLs with formats I didn't recognize, and I am not familiar with ARKs. Thank you and Hemat for your work, and again I am sorry for the inconvenience. --Dylan620 (talk) 19:08, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2021-10-27T19:08:00.000Z","author":"Dylan620","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Dylan620-2021-10-27T19:08:00.000Z-Beardbrarian-2021-10-27T14:53:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->
@Dylan620: No worries! They are funky looking URLs, so it's understandable they could raise suspicion. I don't think ARKs are nearly as widely used as DOIs, which doesn't help make them more recognizable. Thanks! Beardbrarian (talk) 22:27, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2021-10-27T22:27:00.000Z","author":"Beardbrarian","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Beardbrarian-2021-10-27T22:27:00.000Z-Beardbrarian-2021-10-27T14:53:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2021-11-03T19:55:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiCup_2021_November_newsletter-2021-11-03T19:55:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2021-11-03T19:55:00.000Z-WikiCup_2021_November_newsletter"],"text":"WikiCup 2021 November newsletter","linkableTitle":"WikiCup 2021 November newsletter"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2021-11-03T19:55:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiCup_2021_November_newsletter-2021-11-03T19:55:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2021-11-03T19:55:00.000Z-WikiCup_2021_November_newsletter"],"text":"WikiCup 2021 November newsletter","linkableTitle":"WikiCup 2021 November newsletter"}-->
The WikiCup is over for another year and the finalists can relax! Our Champion this year is The Rambling Man (submissions), who amassed over 5000 points in the final round, achieving 8 featured articles and almost 500 reviews. It was a very competitive round; seven of the finalists achieved over 1000 points in the round (enough to win the 2019 contest), and three scored over 3000 (enough to win the 2020 event). Our 2021 finalists and their scores were:
All those who reached the final round will win awards. The following special awards will be made based on high performance in particular areas of content creation and review. Awards will be handed out in the next few days.
The Rambling Man (submissions) wins the reviewer prize, for 68 FAC reviews and 213 GAN reviews, both in round 5.
Epicgenius (submissions) wins the DYK prize, for 30 did you know articles in round 3 and 105 overall.
Bloom6132 (submissions) wins the ITN prize, for 71 in the news articles in round 1 and 284 overall.
Congratulations to everyone who participated in this year's WikiCup, whether they made it to the final round or not, and particular congratulations to the newcomers to the WikiCup, some of whom did very well. Wikipedia has benefitted greatly from the quality creations, expansions and improvements made, and the numerous reviews performed. Thanks to all who have taken part and helped out with the competition, not forgetting User:Jarry1250, who runs the scoring bot.
If you have views on whether the rules or scoring need adjustment for next year's contest, please comment on the WikiCup talk page. Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2022 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:55, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2021-11-03T19:55:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2021-11-03T19:55:00.000Z-WikiCup_2021_November_newsletter","replies":[]}}-->
I didn't see the sandbox thing on ur last thing. I thought I was on sandbox, but nope. SuperSonicGamingYT18 (talk) 03:08, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2021-11-14T03:08:00.000Z","author":"SuperSonicGamingYT18","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-SuperSonicGamingYT18-2021-11-14T03:08:00.000Z-Sorry","replies":["c-Dylan620-2021-11-14T04:02:00.000Z-SuperSonicGamingYT18-2021-11-14T03:08:00.000Z"]}}-->
@SuperSonicGamingYT18: I appreciate your apology — is there anything I can do to help you get started with editing? This page also contains useful information for new editors. Cheers, Dylan620 (talk) 04:02, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2021-11-14T04:02:00.000Z","author":"Dylan620","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Dylan620-2021-11-14T04:02:00.000Z-SuperSonicGamingYT18-2021-11-14T03:08:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->
Yeah, it is pretty hard to visually edit. How do I do it? SuperSonicGamingYT18 (talk) 04:54, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2021-11-14T04:54:00.000Z","author":"SuperSonicGamingYT18","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-SuperSonicGamingYT18-2021-11-14T04:54:00.000Z-Sorry","replies":["c-Dylan620-2021-11-15T04:42:00.000Z-SuperSonicGamingYT18-2021-11-14T04:54:00.000Z"]}}-->
@SuperSonicGamingYT18: Apologies for the late response. I will be very honest — I'm not terribly familiar with visual editing myself. I've been using the source editor ever since I joined, and I still find its interface easier to navigate than the visual editor. If you want to use the visual editor, then Help:VisualEditor provides information that I find useful.
I can give you a quick rundown of some of the most basic yet vital functions of wiki markup:
To link to a page on Wikipedia, use two brackets on each side of the title of the page you want to link. For instance, if you want to link to Sonic the Hedgehog, type [[Sonic the Hedgehog]]
To link to an external website, you can just paste the URL into the edit box like so: http://nhc.noaa.gov. If you want to shorten the visual appearance of the link so it takes up less space on the screen, then add one bracket to each end; applying this to the previous link yields [2]. You can label a link by first adding a space in between the URL and the closing bracket, and then adding text before the closing bracket, like this
Italic and bold text are achieved by using two or three (respectively) apostrophes at each end of a word or phrase. Example: fish is rendered in wikitext as ''fish'', and chips is rendered in wikitext as '''chips'''
To insert an image or other form of media into an article, type [[File:<name of file goes here>|thumb|<caption text goes here>]]
Additional valuable information can be found at Help:Editing. Also, in your personal preferences, you can check off an option to add an edit toolbar to the top of the edit box; this toolbar includes a drop-down "Help" menu as well as quick and easy access to various editing functions. I hope this helps, and I'll be glad to lend further assistance. --Dylan620 (talk) 04:42, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2021-11-15T04:42:00.000Z","author":"Dylan620","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Dylan620-2021-11-15T04:42:00.000Z-SuperSonicGamingYT18-2021-11-14T04:54:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2021-11-23T00:24:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2021-11-23T00:24:00.000Z-ArbCom_2021_Elections_voter_message","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Th78blue-2021-11-23T19:13:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Some_stroopwafels_for_you!-2021-11-23T19:13:00.000Z","replies":["c-Th78blue-2021-11-23T19:13:00.000Z-Some_stroopwafels_for_you!"],"text":"Some stroopwafels for you!","linkableTitle":"Some stroopwafels for you!"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Th78blue-2021-11-23T19:13:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Some_stroopwafels_for_you!-2021-11-23T19:13:00.000Z","replies":["c-Th78blue-2021-11-23T19:13:00.000Z-Some_stroopwafels_for_you!"],"text":"Some stroopwafels for you!","linkableTitle":"Some stroopwafels for you!"}-->
I find that reverting ceaseless vandalism is easier with some stroopwafels! Take care now! Th78blue (They/Them/Their • talk)19:13, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2021-11-23T19:13:00.000Z","author":"Th78blue","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Th78blue-2021-11-23T19:13:00.000Z-Some_stroopwafels_for_you!","replies":["c-Dylan620-2021-11-24T19:09:00.000Z-Th78blue-2021-11-23T19:13:00.000Z"]}}-->
@Th78blue: *om nom nom* delicious! Thank you for this message, and also for your own work to help Wikipedia :) --Dylan620 (talk) 19:09, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2021-11-24T19:09:00.000Z","author":"Dylan620","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Dylan620-2021-11-24T19:09:00.000Z-Th78blue-2021-11-23T19:13:00.000Z","replies":["c-Th78blue-2021-11-24T19:44:00.000Z-Dylan620-2021-11-24T19:09:00.000Z"]}}-->
Glad you "enjoyed" them! ♥Th78blue (They/Them/Their • talk)19:44, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2021-11-24T19:44:00.000Z","author":"Th78blue","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Th78blue-2021-11-24T19:44:00.000Z-Dylan620-2021-11-24T19:09:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->
Why does everyone say Wikipedia lies? I call BS on that tho SuperSonicGamingYT18 (talk) 02:54, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2021-11-25T02:54:00.000Z","author":"SuperSonicGamingYT18","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-SuperSonicGamingYT18-2021-11-25T02:54:00.000Z-Why_tho","replies":["c-Dylan620-2021-11-27T19:34:00.000Z-SuperSonicGamingYT18-2021-11-25T02:54:00.000Z"]}}-->
@SuperSonicGamingYT18: Hi there, apologies for the late response (again), I've been busy with off-wiki obligations. Wikipedia has historically drawn some skepticism about its accuracy, due to its "anyone can edit" philosophy. However, policies and guidelines are in place (including but not limited to verifiability, no original research, reliable sources, neutral point of view, and biographies of living persons) to ensure the quality of the information which is present in or added to articles. Thanks in part to such standards, Wikipedia is generally considered to be highly accurate. --Dylan620 (talk) 19:34, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2021-11-27T19:34:00.000Z","author":"Dylan620","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Dylan620-2021-11-27T19:34:00.000Z-SuperSonicGamingYT18-2021-11-25T02:54:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->
Oh ok lol SuperSonicGamingYT18 (talk) 05:31, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2021-12-05T05:31:00.000Z","author":"SuperSonicGamingYT18","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-SuperSonicGamingYT18-2021-12-05T05:31:00.000Z-Why_tho","replies":[]}}-->
You would be right; I thought I was reverting the vandalism. I was using Huggle, and I believe what may have happened was that there was a delay between ClueBot reverting the vandalism and me still seeing the vandalised revision so choosing to revert it, also! Thank you for clearing that one up for me. :-) Patient Zerotalk03:27, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2021-11-29T03:27:00.000Z","author":"Patient Zero","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Patient_Zero-2021-11-29T03:27:00.000Z-Oops","replies":["c-Dylan620-2021-11-29T03:31:00.000Z-Patient_Zero-2021-11-29T03:27:00.000Z"]}}-->
@Patient Zero: No worries :) same thing has happened to me from time to time! --Dylan620 (he/him) (talk) 03:31, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2021-11-29T03:31:00.000Z","author":"Dylan620","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Dylan620-2021-11-29T03:31:00.000Z-Patient_Zero-2021-11-29T03:27:00.000Z","replies":[],"displayName":"Dylan620 (he\/him)"}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Dylan620-2021-12-01T17:48:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Admin_help_requested-2021-12-01T17:48:00.000Z","replies":["c-Dylan620-2021-12-01T17:48:00.000Z-Admin_help_requested"],"text":"Admin help requested","linkableTitle":"Admin help requested"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Dylan620-2021-12-01T17:48:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Admin_help_requested-2021-12-01T17:48:00.000Z","replies":["c-Dylan620-2021-12-01T17:48:00.000Z-Admin_help_requested"],"text":"Admin help requested","linkableTitle":"Admin help requested"}-->
This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.
Hi there,
I just uploaded the album cover for This Wild Willing by Glen Hansard (incredible album, strongly recommended listening, but I digress). I couldn't figure out how to reduce the file size before I initially uploaded, so I did so with a resolution of 700px2; I managed to reduce the resolution to 300px2 after uploading, but I would like for an administrator to please delete the previous version because it is now orphaned NFC. (If anyone has any suggestions of how I could reduce the resolution of a file before uploading it, I would welcome that, too.) Thank you, Dylan620 (he/him) (talk) 17:48, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2021-12-01T17:48:00.000Z","author":"Dylan620","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Dylan620-2021-12-01T17:48:00.000Z-Admin_help_requested","replies":["c-JBW-2021-12-01T20:12:00.000Z-Dylan620-2021-12-01T17:48:00.000Z"],"displayName":"Dylan620 (he\/him)"}}-->
I have deleted the earlier version of the file from the history. As for reducing the resolution of a file before uploading it, there are many pieces of image editing software which can do that. GIMP is a free one, but I find it sometimes difficult to figure out how to do what I want with it. You could try asking for suggestions at the help desk or the reference desk, as there must be many editors who frequently do that kind of thing. JBW (talk) 20:12, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2021-12-01T20:12:00.000Z","author":"JBW","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-JBW-2021-12-01T20:12:00.000Z-Dylan620-2021-12-01T17:48:00.000Z","replies":["c-Dylan620-2021-12-02T03:33:00.000Z-JBW-2021-12-01T20:12:00.000Z"]}}-->
@JBW: Thank you kindly. I'm downloading GIMP now and will give it a try tomorrow; if it doesn't work out, then I'll drop a line at the help desk. --Dylan620 (he/him) (talk) 03:33, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2021-12-02T03:33:00.000Z","author":"Dylan620","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Dylan620-2021-12-02T03:33:00.000Z-JBW-2021-12-01T20:12:00.000Z","replies":[],"displayName":"Dylan620 (he\/him)"}}-->
Since I notice you’ve been very alert on the active vandalism on 2022 FIFA World Cup qualification (CONMEBOL), you might be interested that the vandal you’ve been reverting is part of an LTA, located here. Jalen Folf(talk)17:18, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2021-12-16T17:18:00.000Z","author":"JalenFolf","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-JalenFolf-2021-12-16T17:18:00.000Z-Goat_vandal","replies":["c-Dylan620-2021-12-17T01:18:00.000Z-JalenFolf-2021-12-16T17:18:00.000Z"],"displayName":"Jalen Folf"}}-->
Hi JalenFolf, thank you for the heads up. --Dylan620 (he/him · talk · edits) 01:18, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2021-12-17T01:18:00.000Z","author":"Dylan620","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Dylan620-2021-12-17T01:18:00.000Z-JalenFolf-2021-12-16T17:18:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->
Stop Hipponos (talk) 01:36, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2021-12-17T01:36:00.000Z","author":"Hipponos","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Hipponos-2021-12-17T01:36:00.000Z-Stop","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2022-01-05T14:36:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Welcome_to_the_2022_WikiCup!-2022-01-05T14:36:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2022-01-05T14:36:00.000Z-Welcome_to_the_2022_WikiCup!"],"text":"Welcome to the 2022 WikiCup!","linkableTitle":"Welcome to the 2022 WikiCup!"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2022-01-05T14:36:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Welcome_to_the_2022_WikiCup!-2022-01-05T14:36:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2022-01-05T14:36:00.000Z-Welcome_to_the_2022_WikiCup!"],"text":"Welcome to the 2022 WikiCup!","linkableTitle":"Welcome to the 2022 WikiCup!"}-->
Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2022 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor you should be able to advance to at least the second round, improving your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page. Any questions on the rules or on anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: Sturmvogel 66 (talk·contribs·email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk·contribs·email). Good luck! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:36, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2022-01-05T14:36:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2022-01-05T14:36:00.000Z-Welcome_to_the_2022_WikiCup!","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2022-01-05T15:02:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Welcome_to_the_2022_WikiCup!_2-2022-01-05T15:02:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2022-01-05T15:02:00.000Z-Welcome_to_the_2022_WikiCup!_2"],"text":"Welcome to the 2022 WikiCup!","linkableTitle":"Welcome to the 2022 WikiCup! 2"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2022-01-05T15:02:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Welcome_to_the_2022_WikiCup!_2-2022-01-05T15:02:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2022-01-05T15:02:00.000Z-Welcome_to_the_2022_WikiCup!_2"],"text":"Welcome to the 2022 WikiCup!","linkableTitle":"Welcome to the 2022 WikiCup! 2"}-->
Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2022 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor you should be able to advance to at least the second round, improving your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page. Any questions on the rules or on anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: Sturmvogel 66 (talk·contribs·email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk·contribs·email). Good luck! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:02, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2022-01-05T15:02:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2022-01-05T15:02:00.000Z-Welcome_to_the_2022_WikiCup!_2","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-B-bot-2022-01-10T18:42:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Orphaned_non-free_image_File:Modest_Mouse_Night_on_the_Sun_EP_2016_cover.jpg-2022-01-10T18:42:00.000Z","replies":["c-B-bot-2022-01-10T18:42:00.000Z-Orphaned_non-free_image_File:Modest_Mouse_Night_on_the_Sun_EP_2016_cover.jpg"],"text":"Orphaned non-free image File:Modest Mouse Night on the Sun EP 2016 cover.jpg","linkableTitle":"Orphaned non-free image File:Modest Mouse Night on the Sun EP 2016 cover.jpg"}-->
Orphaned non-free image File:Modest Mouse Night on the Sun EP 2016 cover.jpg
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-B-bot-2022-01-10T18:42:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Orphaned_non-free_image_File:Modest_Mouse_Night_on_the_Sun_EP_2016_cover.jpg-2022-01-10T18:42:00.000Z","replies":["c-B-bot-2022-01-10T18:42:00.000Z-Orphaned_non-free_image_File:Modest_Mouse_Night_on_the_Sun_EP_2016_cover.jpg"],"text":"Orphaned non-free image File:Modest Mouse Night on the Sun EP 2016 cover.jpg","linkableTitle":"Orphaned non-free image File:Modest Mouse Night on the Sun EP 2016 cover.jpg"}-->
Thanks for uploading File:Modest Mouse Night on the Sun EP 2016 cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:42, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2022-01-10T18:42:00.000Z","author":"B-bot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-B-bot-2022-01-10T18:42:00.000Z-Orphaned_non-free_image_File:Modest_Mouse_Night_on_the_Sun_EP_2016_cover.jpg","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2022-03-03T12:06:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiCup_2022_March_newsletter-2022-03-03T12:06:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2022-03-03T12:06:00.000Z-WikiCup_2022_March_newsletter"],"text":"WikiCup 2022 March newsletter","linkableTitle":"WikiCup 2022 March newsletter"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2022-03-03T12:06:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiCup_2022_March_newsletter-2022-03-03T12:06:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2022-03-03T12:06:00.000Z-WikiCup_2022_March_newsletter"],"text":"WikiCup 2022 March newsletter","linkableTitle":"WikiCup 2022 March newsletter"}-->
And so ends the first round of the WikiCup. Last year anyone who scored more than zero points moved on to Round 2, but this was not the case this year, and a score of 13 or more was required to proceed. The top scorers in Round 1 were:
Epicgenius, a finalist last year, who led the field with 1906 points, gained from 32 GAs and 19 DYKs, all on the topic of New York buildings.
AryKun, new to the contest, was second with 1588 points, having achieved 2 FAs, 11 GAs and various other submissions, mostly on the subject of birds.
Bloom6132, a WikiCup veteran, was in third place with 682 points, garnered from 51 In the news items and several DYKs.
GhostRiver was close behind with 679 points, gained from achieving 12 GAs, mostly on ice hockey players, and 35 GARs.
Kavyansh.Singh was in fifth place with 551 points, with an FA, a FL, and many reviews.
SounderBruce was next with 454 points, gained from an FA and various other submissions, mostly on United States highways.
Ktin, another WikiCup veteran, was in seventh place with 412 points, mostly gained from In the news items.
These contestants, like all the others who qualified for Round 2, now have to start scoring points again from scratch. Between them, contestants completed reviews of a large number of good articles as the contest ran concurrently with a GAN backlog drive. Well done all! To qualify for Round 3, contestants will need to finish Round 2 among the top thirty-two participants.
Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Anything that should have been claimed for in Round 1 is no longer eligible for points. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.
Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:06, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2022-03-03T12:06:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2022-03-03T12:06:00.000Z-WikiCup_2022_March_newsletter","replies":[]}}-->
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:56, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2022-04-05T06:56:00.000Z","author":"Gerda Arendt","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Gerda_Arendt-2022-04-05T06:56:00.000Z-Precious_anniversary","replies":["c-Dylan620-2022-04-06T00:07:00.000Z-Gerda_Arendt-2022-04-05T06:56:00.000Z"]}}-->
Hard to believe it's been nine years already :,) Thank you so much Gerda, I hope you are well! --Dylan620 (he/him · talk · edits) 00:07, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2022-04-06T00:07:00.000Z","author":"Dylan620","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Dylan620-2022-04-06T00:07:00.000Z-Gerda_Arendt-2022-04-05T06:56:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->
You reverted my legitimate redirect/merge of duplicate articles.--142.167.135.137 (talk) 01:38, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2022-04-06T01:38:00.000Z","author":"142.167.135.137","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-142.167.135.137-2022-04-06T01:38:00.000Z-Articles_already_exist","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Cwmhiraeth-2020-05-01T10:39:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiCup_2022_May_newsletter-2020-05-01T10:39:00.000Z","replies":["c-Cwmhiraeth-2020-05-01T10:39:00.000Z-WikiCup_2022_May_newsletter"],"text":"WikiCup 2022 May newsletter","linkableTitle":"WikiCup 2022 May newsletter"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Cwmhiraeth-2020-05-01T10:39:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiCup_2022_May_newsletter-2020-05-01T10:39:00.000Z","replies":["c-Cwmhiraeth-2020-05-01T10:39:00.000Z-WikiCup_2022_May_newsletter"],"text":"WikiCup 2022 May newsletter","linkableTitle":"WikiCup 2022 May newsletter"}-->
The second round of the 2022 WikiCup has now finished. It was a high-scoring round and contestants needed 115 points to advance to round 3. There were some very impressive efforts in round 2, with the top seven contestants all scoring more than 500 points. A large number of the points came from the 11 featured articles and the 79 good articles achieved in total by contestants.
Our top scorers in round 2 were:
Epicgenius, with 1264 points from 2 featured article, 4 good articles and 18 DYKs. Epicgenius was a finalist last year but has now withdrawn from the contest as he pursues a new career path.
AryKun, with 1172 points from two featured articles, one good article and a substantial number of featured article and good article reviews.
Bloom6132, with 605 points from 44 in the news items and 4 DYKs.
Sammi Brie, with 573 points from 8 GAs and 21 DYKs.
Ealdgyth, with 567 points from 11 GAs and 34 good and featured article reviews.
Panini!, with 549 points from 1 FA, 4 GAs and several other sources.
Lee Vilenski, with 545 points from 1 FA, 4 GAs and a number of reviews.
The rules for featured and good article reviews require the review to be of sufficient length; brief quick fails and very short reviews will generally not be awarded points. Remember also that DYKs cannot be claimed until they have appeared on the main page. As we enter the third round, any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed now, and anything you forgot to claim in round 2 cannot! Remember too, that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and CwmhiraethCwmhiraeth (talk) 10:39, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2020-05-01T10:39:00.000Z","author":"Cwmhiraeth","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Cwmhiraeth-2020-05-01T10:39:00.000Z-WikiCup_2022_May_newsletter","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Volten001-2022-05-04T21:13:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-A_barnstar_for_you!-2022-05-04T21:13:00.000Z","replies":["c-Volten001-2022-05-04T21:13:00.000Z-A_barnstar_for_you!","c-Volten001-2022-05-05T02:51:00.000Z-A_barnstar_for_you!"],"text":"A barnstar for you!","linkableTitle":"A barnstar for you!"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Volten001-2022-05-04T21:13:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-A_barnstar_for_you!-2022-05-04T21:13:00.000Z","replies":["c-Volten001-2022-05-04T21:13:00.000Z-A_barnstar_for_you!","c-Volten001-2022-05-05T02:51:00.000Z-A_barnstar_for_you!"],"text":"A barnstar for you!","linkableTitle":"A barnstar for you!"}-->
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
For your efforts in keeping the vandals away... Volten001☎21:13, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2022-05-04T21:13:00.000Z","author":"Volten001","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Volten001-2022-05-04T21:13:00.000Z-A_barnstar_for_you!","replies":["c-Dylan620-2022-05-04T21:15:00.000Z-Volten001-2022-05-04T21:13:00.000Z"]}}-->
Thank you Volten001, that's very kind of you! :) --Dylan620 (he/him · talk · edits) 21:15, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2022-05-04T21:15:00.000Z","author":"Dylan620","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Dylan620-2022-05-04T21:15:00.000Z-Volten001-2022-05-04T21:13:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->
You're most welcome... Happy editing! Volten001☎02:51, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2022-05-05T02:51:00.000Z","author":"Volten001","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Volten001-2022-05-05T02:51:00.000Z-A_barnstar_for_you!","replies":[]}}-->
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to assume bad faith when dealing with other editors, you may be blocked from editing. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia. FourGLTE (talk) 00:08, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2022-05-06T00:08:00.000Z","author":"FourGLTE","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-FourGLTE-2022-05-06T00:08:00.000Z-Notice","replies":["c-Dylan620-2022-05-06T00:13:00.000Z-FourGLTE-2022-05-06T00:08:00.000Z"]}}-->
@FourGLTE: With all due respect, it is impossible to ascribe good faith to this edit. --Dylan620 (he/him · talk · edits) 00:13, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2022-05-06T00:13:00.000Z","author":"Dylan620","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Dylan620-2022-05-06T00:13:00.000Z-FourGLTE-2022-05-06T00:08:00.000Z","replies":["c-Amadeus1999-2022-05-06T00:30:00.000Z-Dylan620-2022-05-06T00:13:00.000Z"]}}-->
Probably best not to revert his comment(s) on WP:ANV though. That seems improper. ★AmaTALKCONTRIBS00:30, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2022-05-06T00:30:00.000Z","author":"Amadeus1999","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Amadeus1999-2022-05-06T00:30:00.000Z-Dylan620-2022-05-06T00:13:00.000Z","replies":["c-Dylan620-2022-05-06T00:33:00.000Z-Amadeus1999-2022-05-06T00:30:00.000Z"],"displayName":"\u2605Ama"}}-->
@Amadeus1999: I reverted their comment because it was a blatant falsehood; their ANI post was in retaliation to the AIV report (compare the timestamps for each report). Also, look at their edits. --Dylan620 (he/him · talk · edits) 00:33, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2022-05-06T00:33:00.000Z","author":"Dylan620","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Dylan620-2022-05-06T00:33:00.000Z-Amadeus1999-2022-05-06T00:30:00.000Z","replies":["c-Amadeus1999-2022-05-06T00:36:00.000Z-Dylan620-2022-05-06T00:33:00.000Z"]}}-->
@Dylan620: Oh yeah don't get me wrong, I know it's a (probable) falsehood and that their edits are pure trolls, and he's blocked now I see. I just meant to say that removing someone else's comments on ANV can obviously look a little scummy at first sight. ★AmaTALKCONTRIBS00:36, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2022-05-06T00:36:00.000Z","author":"Amadeus1999","type":"comment","level":5,"id":"c-Amadeus1999-2022-05-06T00:36:00.000Z-Dylan620-2022-05-06T00:33:00.000Z","replies":["c-Dylan620-2022-05-06T00:39:00.000Z-Amadeus1999-2022-05-06T00:36:00.000Z"],"displayName":"\u2605Ama"}}-->
@Amadeus1999: Yeah that's fair, I'd already decided not to revert the ANI post for the same reason, so I probably shouldn't have reverted the AIV comment either. --Dylan620 (he/him · talk · edits) 00:39, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2022-05-06T00:39:00.000Z","author":"Dylan620","type":"comment","level":6,"id":"c-Dylan620-2022-05-06T00:39:00.000Z-Amadeus1999-2022-05-06T00:36:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Buidhe-2022-05-28T04:26:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-June_2022_Good_Article_Nominations_backlog_drive-2022-05-28T04:26:00.000Z","replies":["c-Buidhe-2022-05-28T04:26:00.000Z-June_2022_Good_Article_Nominations_backlog_drive"],"text":"June 2022 Good Article Nominations backlog drive","linkableTitle":"June 2022 Good Article Nominations backlog drive"}-->
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages.
(t · c) buidhe04:26, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2022-05-28T04:26:00.000Z","author":"Buidhe","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Buidhe-2022-05-28T04:26:00.000Z-June_2022_Good_Article_Nominations_backlog_drive","replies":[]}}-->
Happy birthday! Hi Dylan620! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy birthday! Enjoy this special day! CAPTAIN RAJU(T)09:55, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2022-06-20T09:55:00.000Z","author":"CAPTAIN RAJU","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-CAPTAIN_RAJU-2022-06-20T09:55:00.000Z-Happy_Birthday!_3","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2022-07-03T12:51:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiCup_2022_July_newsletter-2022-07-03T12:51:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2022-07-03T12:51:00.000Z-WikiCup_2022_July_newsletter"],"text":"WikiCup 2022 July newsletter","linkableTitle":"WikiCup 2022 July newsletter"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2022-07-03T12:51:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiCup_2022_July_newsletter-2022-07-03T12:51:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2022-07-03T12:51:00.000Z-WikiCup_2022_July_newsletter"],"text":"WikiCup 2022 July newsletter","linkableTitle":"WikiCup 2022 July newsletter"}-->
The third round of the 2022 WikiCup has now come to an end. Each of the sixteen contestants who made it into the fourth round had at least 180 points, which is a lower figure than last year when 294 points were needed to progress to round 4. Our top scorers in round 3 were:
BennyOnTheLoose, with 746 points, a tally built both on snooker and other sports topics, and on more general subjects.
Bloom6132, with 683 points, garnered mostly from "In the news" items and related DYKs.
Sammi Brie, with 527, from a variety of submissions related to radio and television stations.
Between them contestants achieved 5 featured articles, 4 featured lists, 51 good articles, 149 DYK entries, 68 ITN entries, and 109 good article reviews. As we enter the fourth round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met. Please also remember that all submissions must meet core Wikipedia policies, regardless of the review process.
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is a good article nomination, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. WikiCup judges: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:51, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2022-07-03T12:51:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2022-07-03T12:51:00.000Z-WikiCup_2022_July_newsletter","replies":[]}}-->
Hello sir I removed that section because of that section Sidhu was getting unnecessary hate. Everyone has different opinion about Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale for Punjab people he is matry and strong leader who stood against Indian government dominance according to many sources he never demanded khalistan his main motive is anandapur resolution many big politicians like Subramanian Swamy also said that bhindranwale was Sant Daredevils56 (talk) 12:05, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20220807120500","author":"Daredevils56","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Daredevils56-20220807120500-About_Sidhu_Moose_wala_page","replies":["c-Dylan620-20220809193900-Daredevils56-20220807120500"]}}-->
Hi Daredevils56, and apologies for the late response; I had a busy couple of days off-wiki. I find myself in agreement with what Fylindfotberserk (courtesy ping) told you on their talk page — such a significant removal of sourced content should be discussed on the article's talk page. Furthermore, I strongly recommend reading Wikipedia's policy on editing neutrally. In any given article, we should strive to proportionately and fairly describe all significant viewpoints which are held regarding that article's subject(s), as long as those views are covered in reliable sources; as far as I can tell from the sources provided for that section (although due to my language barrier I am unfortunately unable to understand the YouTube video cited), Moose Wala did indeed generate controversy with the Khalisan references in "Panjab," and I would caution against removing sourced material solely because it appears to paint (a) subject(s) in a negative light. --Dylan620in public/on mobile (he/him · talk) 19:39, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20220809193900","author":"Dylan620","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Dylan620-20220809193900-Daredevils56-20220807120500","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Miguel7190289-20220901185600","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-A_barnstar_for_you!_2-20220901185600","replies":["c-Miguel7190289-20220901185600-A_barnstar_for_you!_2"],"text":"A barnstar for you!","linkableTitle":"A barnstar for you! 2"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Miguel7190289-20220901185600","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-A_barnstar_for_you!_2-20220901185600","replies":["c-Miguel7190289-20220901185600-A_barnstar_for_you!_2"],"text":"A barnstar for you!","linkableTitle":"A barnstar for you! 2"}-->
The Original Barnstar
bdahhthrthstrshtsthdgt yhjrhser stryusfga hs ha Miguel7190289 (talk) 18:56, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20220901185600","author":"Miguel7190289","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Miguel7190289-20220901185600-A_barnstar_for_you!_2","replies":["c-Dylan620-20220902003900-Miguel7190289-20220901185600"]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20220903124400","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiCup_2022_September_newsletter_2-20220903124400","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20220903124400-WikiCup_2022_September_newsletter_2"],"text":"WikiCup 2022 September newsletter","linkableTitle":"WikiCup 2022 September newsletter 2"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20220903124400","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiCup_2022_September_newsletter_2-20220903124400","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20220903124400-WikiCup_2022_September_newsletter_2"],"text":"WikiCup 2022 September newsletter","linkableTitle":"WikiCup 2022 September newsletter 2"}-->
The fourth round of the WikiCup has now finished. 383 points were required to reach the final, and the new round has got off to a flying start with all finalists already scoring. In round 4, Bloom6132 with 939 points was the highest points-scorer, with a combination of DYKs and In the news items, followed by BennyOnTheLoose, Sammi Brie and Lee Vilenski. The points of all contestants are swept away as we start afresh for the final round.
At this stage, we say goodbye to the eight competitors who didn't quite make it; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia, and we hope you will join us again next year. For the remaining competitors, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them, and importantly, before the deadline on October 31st!
If you are concerned that your nomination, whether it be for a good article, a featured process, or anything else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. The judges are Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:44, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20220903124400","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20220903124400-WikiCup_2022_September_newsletter_2","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-CAPTAIN_RAJU-20220914160600","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Happy_First_Edit_Day!_3-20220914160600","replies":["c-CAPTAIN_RAJU-20220914160600-Happy_First_Edit_Day!_3","c-Dylan620-20220915215300-Happy_First_Edit_Day!_3"],"text":"Happy First Edit Day!","linkableTitle":"Happy First Edit Day! 3"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-CAPTAIN_RAJU-20220914160600","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Happy_First_Edit_Day!_3-20220914160600","replies":["c-CAPTAIN_RAJU-20220914160600-Happy_First_Edit_Day!_3","c-Dylan620-20220915215300-Happy_First_Edit_Day!_3"],"text":"Happy First Edit Day!","linkableTitle":"Happy First Edit Day! 3"}-->
Happy First Edit Day! Hi Dylan620! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! CAPTAIN RAJU(T)16:06, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20220914160600","author":"CAPTAIN RAJU","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-CAPTAIN_RAJU-20220914160600-Happy_First_Edit_Day!_3","replies":[]}}-->
Thank you CAPTAIN RAJU! --Dylan620 (he/him · talk · edits) 21:53, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20220915215300","author":"Dylan620","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Dylan620-20220915215300-Happy_First_Edit_Day!_3","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Chris_troutman-20220914211900","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Invitation_to_join_the_Fifteen_Year_Society-20220914211900","replies":["c-Chris_troutman-20220914211900-Invitation_to_join_the_Fifteen_Year_Society"],"text":"Invitation to join the Fifteen Year Society","linkableTitle":"Invitation to join the Fifteen Year Society"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Chris_troutman-20220914211900","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Invitation_to_join_the_Fifteen_Year_Society-20220914211900","replies":["c-Chris_troutman-20220914211900-Invitation_to_join_the_Fifteen_Year_Society"],"text":"Invitation to join the Fifteen Year Society","linkableTitle":"Invitation to join the Fifteen Year Society"}-->
Dear Dylan620,
I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Fifteen Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for fifteen years or more.
Best regards, Chris Troutman (talk)21:19, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20220914211900","author":"Chris troutman","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Chris_troutman-20220914211900-Invitation_to_join_the_Fifteen_Year_Society","replies":["c-Dylan620-20220915215300-Chris_troutman-20220914211900"]}}-->
Thank you Chris, I accept. Hard to believe it's been that long already. --Dylan620 (he/him · talk · edits) 21:53, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20220915215300","author":"Dylan620","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Dylan620-20220915215300-Chris_troutman-20220914211900","replies":[]}}-->
You requested an RD1.
I declined it as the listed sites appear to be public domain. Do you think I'm missing something? S Philbrick(Talk)00:49, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221028004900","author":"Sphilbrick","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Sphilbrick-20221028004900-Declined_RD1","replies":[],"displayName":"S Philbrick"}}-->
Would be eligible for reversion and RD one but I'd want you to make absolutely sure that the material found that site was not also found at the public domain site. S Philbrick(Talk)00:54, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221028005400","author":"Sphilbrick","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Sphilbrick-20221028005400-RD1_request","replies":["c-Dylan620-20221028200200-Sphilbrick-20221028005400"],"displayName":"S Philbrick"}}-->
Hi Sphilbrick and thank you for these messages. It seems that I erred in adding the military URLs to my revdel requests last night, and for that I apologize. I should have realized that, as part of the USDOD, .mil websites would be in the public domain. However, one of the URLs I requested for the Female Engagement Team article, https://taskandpurpose.com/history/fet-infantry-us-military/, is copyrighted to its owners/publishers, and material from it is present in both of the diffs which had been submitted for redaction. As for the United States Army Sniper School article, I have withdrawn the request as pertaining to the military sites but left it in place as pertaining to the Sniper Central site. --Dylan620 (he/him · talk · edits) 20:02, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221028200200","author":"Dylan620","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Dylan620-20221028200200-Sphilbrick-20221028005400","replies":["c-Sphilbrick-20221028213000-Dylan620-20221028200200"]}}-->
Sounds good, thanks. S Philbrick(Talk)21:30, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221028213000","author":"Sphilbrick","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Sphilbrick-20221028213000-Dylan620-20221028200200","replies":["c-Dylan620-20221030051000-Sphilbrick-20221028213000"],"displayName":"S Philbrick"}}-->
@Sphilbrick: No problem. For what it's worth, I've just re-requested revdel on Female Engagement Team per my above message. --Dylan620 (he/him · talk · edits) 05:10, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221030051000","author":"Dylan620","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Dylan620-20221030051000-Sphilbrick-20221028213000","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20221106192800","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiCup_2022_November_newsletter-20221106192800","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20221106192800-WikiCup_2022_November_newsletter"],"text":"WikiCup 2022 November newsletter","linkableTitle":"WikiCup 2022 November newsletter"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20221106192800","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiCup_2022_November_newsletter-20221106192800","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20221106192800-WikiCup_2022_November_newsletter"],"text":"WikiCup 2022 November newsletter","linkableTitle":"WikiCup 2022 November newsletter"}-->
The 2022 WikiCup has drawn to a close with the final round going down to the wire. The 2022 champion is
Lee Vilenski (1752 points), who won in 2020 and was runner up in both 2019 and last year. In the final round he achieved 3 FAs and 15 GAs, mostly on cue sports. He was closely followed by
Bloom6132 (1732), who specialised in "In the news" items and DYKs, and who has reached the final round of the Cup for the past three years. Next was
BennyOnTheLoose (1238), another cue sports enthusiast, also interested in songs, followed by
Muboshgu (1082), an "In the news" contributor, a seasoned contestant who first took part in the Cup ten years ago. Other finalists were
Sammi Brie (930), who scored with a featured article, good articles and DYKs on TV and radio stations,
Kavyansh.Singh (370), who created various articles on famous Americans, including an FA on Louis H. Bean, famed for his prediction of election outcomes. Next was
PCN02WPS (292), who scored with good articles and DYKs on sporting and other topics and
Z1720 (25) who had DYKs on various topics including historic Canadians.
During the WikiCup, contestants achieved 37 featured articles, 349 good articles, 360 featured article reviews, 683 good article reviews and 480 In the news items, so Wikipedia has benefited greatly from the activities of WikiCup competitors. Well done everyone! All those who reached the final round will receive awards and the following special awards will be made, based on high performance in particular areas of content creation and review. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, these prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round, or the overall leader in this field.
Lee Vilenski wins the featured article prize, for a total of 6 FAs during the course of the competition and 3 in the final round.
Kavyansh.Singh wins the featured list prize, for 3 FLs in round 2.
Adam Cuerden wins the featured picture prize, for 39 FPs during the competition.
Z1720 wins the featured article reviewer prize, for 35 FARs in round 4.
Epicgenius wins the good article prize, for 32 GAs in round 1.
SounderBruce wins the featured topic prize, for 4 FT articles in round 1.
Lee Vilenski wins the good topic prize, for 34 GT articles in round 5.
Sammi Brie wins the good article reviewer prize, for 71 GARs overall.
Sammi Brie wins the Did you know prize, for 30 DYKs in round 3 and 106 overall.
Bloom6132 wins the In the news prize, for 106 ITNs in round 5 and 289 overall.
Next year's competition will begin on 1 January and possible changes to the rules and scoring are being discussed on the discussion page. You are invited to sign up to take part in the contest; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to have a good turnout for the 2023 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners and finalists, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:28, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221106192800","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20221106192800-WikiCup_2022_November_newsletter","replies":[]}}-->
Dear project member,
This message is being sent out to encourage new ideas and feedback on those proposed in regard to the colors debate for WikiProject Weather. For those who are unaware of what's been happening over the last year, I will give a brief summary. We have been discussing proposed changes to the colors of the dots on tropical cyclone maps and templates and infoboxes across the entire weather project in order to solve issues related to the limited contrast between colors for both normal vision as well as the various types of color blindness (MOS:ACCESS). We had partially implemented a proposal earlier this year, however, it was objected to by a number of people and additional issues were presented that made it evident this wasn't the optimal solution. We tried to come up with other solutions to address the issues related to color contrast, however, none of them gained traction and no consensus was generated.
We need your help and I encourage you to propose your own scale and give feedback on those already listed. Keep in mind that we are NOT making a decision on any individual proposal at this time. We are simply allowing people to make proposals and cultivate them given feedback from other project members. Please visit our project page for additional details. The proposal phase will close no later than December 31st at 23:59 UTC. NoahTalk03:57, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221121035700","author":"Hurricane Noah","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Hurricane_Noah-20221121035700-WikiProject_Weather:_Map_Dot_&_Template\/Infobox_Colors","replies":[],"displayName":"Noah"}}-->
Hello @Dylan620 and sorry to bother you, but the blocked user El Cubano 153 left several more fictional drafts that are probably unwanted. Should a discussion be started for deletion?
Layah50♪ (話して~!) 04:04, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221121040400","author":"Layah50","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Layah50-20221121040400-El_Cubano_153's_remaining_drafts","replies":["c-Dylan620-20221121232600-Layah50-20221121040400"],"displayName":"Layah50\u266a"}}-->
Hi Layah50, it's no bother at all. I do agree there should probably be a discussion for deletion of these drafts. I'd start one myself now, but I'm off to bed for the evening. I'll try to do it tomorrow after work if a discussion isn't live by then. --Dylan620 (he/him · talk · edits) 23:26, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221121232600","author":"Dylan620","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Dylan620-20221121232600-Layah50-20221121040400","replies":["c-Layah50-20221122003200-Dylan620-20221121232600"]}}-->
Alright, thank you and goodnight! Layah50♪ (話して~!) 00:32, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221122003200","author":"Layah50","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Layah50-20221122003200-Dylan620-20221121232600","replies":[],"displayName":"Layah50\u266a"}}-->
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221129004200","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20221129004200-ArbCom_2022_Elections_voter_message","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20230101141600","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Welcome_to_the_2023_WikiCup!-20230101141600","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20230101141600-Welcome_to_the_2023_WikiCup!"],"text":"Welcome to the 2023 WikiCup!","linkableTitle":"Welcome to the 2023 WikiCup!"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20230101141600","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Welcome_to_the_2023_WikiCup!-20230101141600","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20230101141600-Welcome_to_the_2023_WikiCup!"],"text":"Welcome to the 2023 WikiCup!","linkableTitle":"Welcome to the 2023 WikiCup!"}-->
Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2023 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor you should be able to advance to at least the second round, improving your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page ready for you to take part. Any questions on the scoring, rules or anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: Sturmvogel 66 (talk·contribs·email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk·contribs·email). Good luck! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:16, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20230101141600","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20230101141600-Welcome_to_the_2023_WikiCup!","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-George_Ho-20230109022400","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Hurricane_Gloria_under_FA_Review-20230109022400","replies":["c-George_Ho-20230109022400-Hurricane_Gloria_under_FA_Review"],"text":"Hurricane Gloria under FA Review","linkableTitle":"Hurricane Gloria under FA Review"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-George_Ho-20230109022400","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Hurricane_Gloria_under_FA_Review-20230109022400","replies":["c-George_Ho-20230109022400-Hurricane_Gloria_under_FA_Review"],"text":"Hurricane Gloria under FA Review","linkableTitle":"Hurricane Gloria under FA Review"}-->
I have nominated Hurricane Gloria for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. George Ho (talk) 02:24, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20230109022400","author":"George Ho","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-George_Ho-20230109022400-Hurricane_Gloria_under_FA_Review","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20230302193600","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiCup_2023_March_newsletter-20230302193600","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20230302193600-WikiCup_2023_March_newsletter"],"text":"WikiCup 2023 March newsletter","linkableTitle":"WikiCup 2023 March newsletter"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20230302193600","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiCup_2023_March_newsletter-20230302193600","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20230302193600-WikiCup_2023_March_newsletter"],"text":"WikiCup 2023 March newsletter","linkableTitle":"WikiCup 2023 March newsletter"}-->
So ends the first round of the 2023 WikiCup. Everyone with a positive score moved on to Round 2, with 54 contestants qualifying. The top scorers in Round 1 were:
Unlimitedlead with 1205 points, a WikiCup newcomer, led the field with two featured articles on historical figures and several featured article candidate reviews.
Epicgenius was in second place with 789 points; a seasoned WikiCup competitor he specialises in buildings and locations in New York.
FrB.TG was in third place with 625 points, garnered from a featured article on a filmmaker which qualified for an impressive number of bonus points.
TheJoebro64, another WikiCup newcomer, came next with 600 points gained from two featured articles on video games.
Iazyges was in fifth place with 532 points, from two featured articles on classical history.
These contestants, like all the others, now have to start again from scratch. The first round finished on February 26. Remember that any content promoted after that date but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Some contestants made claims before the new submissions pages were set up, and they will need to resubmit them. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.
If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:36, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20230302193600","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20230302193600-WikiCup_2023_March_newsletter","replies":[]}}-->
Ten years ago, you were found precious. That's what you are, always. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:05, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20230405080500","author":"Gerda Arendt","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Gerda_Arendt-20230405080500-Always_precious","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20230502081400","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiCup_2023_May_newsletter-20230502081400","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20230502081400-WikiCup_2023_May_newsletter"],"text":"WikiCup 2023 May newsletter","linkableTitle":"WikiCup 2023 May newsletter"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20230502081400","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiCup_2023_May_newsletter-20230502081400","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20230502081400-WikiCup_2023_May_newsletter"],"text":"WikiCup 2023 May newsletter","linkableTitle":"WikiCup 2023 May newsletter"}-->
The second round of the 2023 WikiCup has now finished. Contestants needed to have scored 60 points to advance into round 3. Our top five scorers in round 2 all included a featured article among their submissions and each scored over 500 points. They were:
So far contestants have achieved thirteen featured articles between them, one being a joint effort, and forty-nine good articles. The judges are pleased with the thorough reviews that are being performed, and have hardly had to reject any. As we enter the third round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed in round 3. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them.
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:14, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20230502081400","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20230502081400-WikiCup_2023_May_newsletter","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20230708151800","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiCup_2023_July_newsletter-20230708151800","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20230708151800-WikiCup_2023_July_newsletter"],"text":"WikiCup 2023 July newsletter","linkableTitle":"WikiCup 2023 July newsletter"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20230708151800","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiCup_2023_July_newsletter-20230708151800","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20230708151800-WikiCup_2023_July_newsletter"],"text":"WikiCup 2023 July newsletter","linkableTitle":"WikiCup 2023 July newsletter"}-->
The third round of the 2023 WikiCup has come to an end. The 16 users who made it to the fourth round had at least 175 points. Our top scorers in round 3 were:
Iazyges, with 560 points from a high-scoring featured article on Tiberius III.
Contestants achieved 11 featured articles, 2 featured lists, 47 good articles, 72 featured or good article reviews, over 100 DYKs and 40 ITN appearances. As always, any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met. Please also remember that all submissions must meet core Wikipedia policies, regardless of the review process.
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:18, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20230708151800","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20230708151800-WikiCup_2023_July_newsletter","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-DPL_bot-20230823060300","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Disambiguation_link_notification_for_August_23-20230823060300","replies":["c-DPL_bot-20230823060300-Disambiguation_link_notification_for_August_23"],"text":"Disambiguation link notification for August 23","linkableTitle":"Disambiguation link notification for August 23"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-DPL_bot-20230823060300","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Disambiguation_link_notification_for_August_23-20230823060300","replies":["c-DPL_bot-20230823060300-Disambiguation_link_notification_for_August_23"],"text":"Disambiguation link notification for August 23","linkableTitle":"Disambiguation link notification for August 23"}-->
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Until I Found You, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgia. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20230823060300","author":"DPL bot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-DPL_bot-20230823060300-Disambiguation_link_notification_for_August_23","replies":[],"displayName":"opt-out instructions"}}-->
The fourth round of the competition has finished, with anyone scoring less than 673 points being eliminated. It was a high scoring round with all but one of the contestants who progressed to the final having achieved an FA during the round. The highest scorers were
Epicgenius, with 2173 points topping the scores, gained mainly from a featured article, 38 good articles and 9 DYKs. He was followed by
Sammi Brie, with 1575 points, gained mainly from a featured article, 28 good articles and 50 good article reviews. Close behind was
Thebiguglyalien, with 1535 points mainly gained from a featured article, 15 good articles, 26 good article reviews and lots of bonus points.
Between them during round 4, contestants achieved 12 featured articles, 3 featured lists, 3 featured pictures, 126 good articles, 46 DYK entries, 14 ITN entries, 67 featured article candidate reviews and 147 good article reviews. Congratulations to our eight finalists and all who participated! It was a generally high-scoring and productive round and I think we can expect a highly competitive finish to the competition.
Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them and within 24 hours of the end of the final. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.
I will be standing down as a judge after the end of the contest. I think the Cup encourages productive editors to improve their contributions to Wikipedia and I hope that someone else will step up to take over the running of the Cup. Sturmvogel 66 (talk), and Cwmhiraeth (talk)
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-142.157.250.127-20230921195500","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Inappropriate_use_of_Huggle-20230921195500","replies":["c-142.157.250.127-20230921195500-Inappropriate_use_of_Huggle"],"text":"Inappropriate use of Huggle","linkableTitle":"Inappropriate use of Huggle"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-142.157.250.127-20230921195500","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Inappropriate_use_of_Huggle-20230921195500","replies":["c-142.157.250.127-20230921195500-Inappropriate_use_of_Huggle"],"text":"Inappropriate use of Huggle","linkableTitle":"Inappropriate use of Huggle"}-->
It is inappropriate to use Huggle to revert good faith and well supported edits as you did at Long hot summer (disambiguation). Please familiarize yourself with the guidelines of using the tool before making such edits again. 142.157.250.127 (talk) 19:55, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20230921195500","author":"142.157.250.127","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-142.157.250.127-20230921195500-Inappropriate_use_of_Huggle","replies":[]}}-->
Hi Dylan620. Please note that according to WP:CHARTS, a chart needs to be ... static, that is, the data in the chart cannot change. This excludes dynamic "all-time" charts ... You are adding the "Greatest of All Time Adult Alternative Songs" which is, by nature, not static. I removed the chart up to #20, please remove the rest yourself. --Muhandes (talk) 09:02, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20231006090200","author":"Muhandes","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Muhandes-20231006090200-Non-static_charts","replies":["c-Dylan620-20231006173400-Muhandes-20231006090200"]}}-->
@Muhandes: Thank you for pointing this out to me, though I am quite disappointed to see. My understanding has been that placing in an all-time chart was a notable quality that merited inclusion in an article. However, I respect that this could be an issue, since Billboard does not readily produce archives of all-time charts like they do with weekly or year-end charts. I am willing to revert my additions as you have requested, but would greatly prefer to discuss first. I have a couple suggestions for workarounds:
Wayback Machine: The most recent updates of the all-time Alternative Songs (35th anniversary, 2023) and Adult Alternative Songs (25th anniversary, 2021), are archived on the Wayback Machine; alt, AAA. Unlike the all-time charts themselves, these archives are static.
Artist chart histories: If an artist has a page on Billboard and has a song that appeared on either of these all-time charts, then one can look up the placements on the artist's chart history. The alternative and AAA all-time chart positions can be directly accessed under the three-letter codes GMT and GAD, respectively. Using Imagine Dragons as an example: GMT, GAD.
Additionally, while this could only be used as a source for a select number of articlesonly mentions a select few songs directly, Billboardran an article last month on the updated all-time artist and song rankings for the Alternative Airplay chart. --Dylan620 (he/him · talk · edits) 17:34, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20231006173400","author":"Dylan620","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Dylan620-20231006173400-Muhandes-20231006090200","replies":["c-Dylan620-20231006205800-Dylan620-20231006173400","c-Muhandes-20231007165100-Dylan620-20231006173400"]}}-->
ResolutionsPerMinute, I see you have also been reverting, and I hope it is okay for me to draw your attention to this discussion because I would like your feedback on these suggestions as well. --Dylan620 (he/him · talk · edits) 20:58, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20231006205800","author":"Dylan620","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Dylan620-20231006205800-Dylan620-20231006173400","replies":["c-ResolutionsPerMinute-20231006210700-Dylan620-20231006205800"]}}-->
Anniversary charts are fine since they only get published once, but don't use the ones that get constantly updated. ResPM (T🔈🎵C) 21:07, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20231006210700","author":"ResolutionsPerMinute","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-ResolutionsPerMinute-20231006210700-Dylan620-20231006205800","replies":["c-Dylan620-20231007023500-ResolutionsPerMinute-20231006210700"],"displayName":"ResPM"}}-->
@ResolutionsPerMinute: Hmmmm... do you think attaching the Billboard article as a source would be sufficient to establish that the all-time chart position is from an anniversary chart, along with using an archived Wayback Machine URL as a source for the position itself? --Dylan620 (he/him · talk · edits) 02:35, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20231007023500","author":"Dylan620","type":"comment","level":5,"id":"c-Dylan620-20231007023500-ResolutionsPerMinute-20231006210700","replies":["c-ResolutionsPerMinute-20231007104000-Dylan620-20231007023500"]}}-->
I don't see the harm in citing the article, but using archives of a dynamic chart? That's no different than citing a live source. It needs to specifically be an anniversary chart. ResPM (T🔈🎵C) 10:40, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20231007104000","author":"ResolutionsPerMinute","type":"comment","level":6,"id":"c-ResolutionsPerMinute-20231007104000-Dylan620-20231007023500","replies":["c-Dylan620-20231007153200-ResolutionsPerMinute-20231007104000"],"displayName":"ResPM"}}-->
@ResolutionsPerMinute: Okay. I am still not convinced that a five-year interval (as has been the case with Alternative Airplay's all-time ranking updates) is sufficiently dynamic to be problematic, but that is a topic for WT:CHARTS instead of here (I may start a RfC in the coming days; still mulling it over). I'm about to leave for work for the afternoon/evening, and will be busy tomorrow as well, but if time permits then I will try to remove the positions which have not yet been reverted. I do intend to restore all-time chart positions that have been explicitly mentioned by the Billboard article — if acceptable, with the help of artistcharthistories to fill in the rest of the top 10. --Dylan620 (he/him · talk · edits) 15:32, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20231007153200","author":"Dylan620","type":"comment","level":7,"id":"c-Dylan620-20231007153200-ResolutionsPerMinute-20231007104000","replies":[]}}-->
I believe the issue with dynamic tables has never been the sourcing, as one could use archived sourced and also, the "all time" positions are often mentioned by secondary sources. I believe the issue was that chart positions should be factual, and with dynamic charts there is no way to state the fact within the chart positions table. I don't see a problem with adding the fact to the text itself, with as qualifier, such as "it charted at #X on the all time chart, as of 2023". Muhandes (talk) 16:51, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20231007165100","author":"Muhandes","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Muhandes-20231007165100-Dylan620-20231006173400","replies":["c-Dylan620-20231010202600-Muhandes-20231007165100"]}}-->
@Muhandes: That all makes sense, and mentioning the all-time chart positions in the text is a good idea. I'll start going through articles after dinner, removing tables in the process. Dylan620 (he/him · talk · edits) 20:26, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20231010202600","author":"Dylan620","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Dylan620-20231010202600-Muhandes-20231007165100","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20231105165100","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiCup_2023_November_newsletter-20231105165100","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20231105165100-WikiCup_2023_November_newsletter"],"text":"WikiCup 2023 November newsletter","linkableTitle":"WikiCup 2023 November newsletter"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20231105165100","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiCup_2023_November_newsletter-20231105165100","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20231105165100-WikiCup_2023_November_newsletter"],"text":"WikiCup 2023 November newsletter","linkableTitle":"WikiCup 2023 November newsletter"}-->
The WikiCup is a marathon rather than a sprint and all those reaching the final round have been involved in the competition for the last ten months, improving Wikipedia vastly during the process. After all this hard work, BeanieFan11 has emerged as the 2023 winner and the WikiCup Champion. The finalists this year were:-
Congratulations to everyone who participated in this year's WikiCup, whether they made it to the final round or not, and particular congratulations to the newcomers to the competition, some of whom did very well. Wikipedia has benefitted greatly from the quality creations, expansions and improvements made, and the numerous reviews performed. All those who reached the final round will win awards. The following special awards will be made based on high performance in particular areas of content creation and review. Awards will be handed out in the next few days.
Unlimitedlead wins the featured article prize, for 7 FAs in total including 3 in round 2.
MyCatIsAChonk wins the featured list prize, for 5 FLs in total.
Lee Vilenski wins the featured topic prize, for a 6-article featured topic in round 4.
MyCatIsAChonk wins the featured picture prize, for 6 FPs in total.
BeanieFan11 wins the good article prize, for 75 GAs in total, including 61 in the final round.
Epicgenius wins the good topic prize, for a 41-article good topic in the final round.
LunaEatsTuna wins the GA reviewer prize, for 70 GA reviews in round 1.
MyCatIsAChonk wins the FA reviewer prize, for 66 FA reviews in the final round.
Epicgenius wins the DYK prize, for 49 did you know articles in total.
Muboshgu wins the ITN prize, for 46 in the news articles in total.
The WikiCup has run every year since 2007. With the 2023 contest now concluded, I will be standing down as a judge due to real life commitments, so I hope that another editor will take over running the competition. Please get in touch if you are interested. Next year's competition will hopefully begin on 1 January 2024. You are invited to sign up to participate in the contest; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors. It only remains to congratulate our worthy winners once again and thank all participants for their involvement! (If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.) Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:51, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20231105165100","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20231105165100-WikiCup_2023_November_newsletter","replies":[]}}-->
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20231128002800","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20231128002800-ArbCom_2023_Elections_voter_message","replies":[]}}-->
Thanks for the heads up on my 2nd vote mistake. I tried to strike the vote, but it still added to the count so I just deleted it with your reply. I hope that's not an issue. Thanks! Nemov (talk) 20:26, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20231230202600","author":"Nemov","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Nemov-20231230202600-Admin_vote","replies":["c-Dylan620-20231230203500-Nemov-20231230202600"]}}-->
@Nemov: No worries, that works! For what it's worth, if you want to remove an RfA vote in the future while still keeping the text, you can indent the vote with a pound symbol (#) in front – this will remove the vote from the count without messing up the numbering. --Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 20:35, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20231230203500","author":"Dylan620","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Dylan620-20231230203500-Nemov-20231230202600","replies":["c-Nemov-20231230204500-Dylan620-20231230203500"]}}-->
Awesome, I'll try to remember that tip. Thanks! Nemov (talk) 20:45, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20231230204500","author":"Nemov","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Nemov-20231230204500-Dylan620-20231230203500","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20240101002100","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Welcome_to_the_2024_WikiCup!-20240101002100","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20240101002100-Welcome_to_the_2024_WikiCup!"],"text":"Welcome to the 2024 WikiCup!","linkableTitle":"Welcome to the 2024 WikiCup!"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20240101002100","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Welcome_to_the_2024_WikiCup!-20240101002100","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20240101002100-Welcome_to_the_2024_WikiCup!"],"text":"Welcome to the 2024 WikiCup!","linkableTitle":"Welcome to the 2024 WikiCup!"}-->
Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2024 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor you should be able to advance to at least the second round, improving your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page ready for you to take part. Any questions on the scoring, rules or anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close on 31 January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: Cwmhiraeth (talk·contribs·email), Epicgenius (talk·contribs·email), and Frostly (talk·contribs·email). Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240101002100","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20240101002100-Welcome_to_the_2024_WikiCup!","replies":[]}}-->
I'm currently working on a revamped version of the 1990 Pacific typhoon season, which you can find here. After I'm finished with that, could you collaborate with me on making a timeline of those events? ''Flux55'' (talk) 23:02, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240130230200","author":"Flux55","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Flux55-20240130230200-Info","replies":["c-Dylan620-20240130232600-Flux55-20240130230200"],"displayName":"''Flux55''"}}-->
@Flux55: I'm admittedly not well-versed in Asian languages, and I'm not sure if that would create language barrier issues for me, but I would love to lend what help I can! Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 23:26, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240130232600","author":"Dylan620","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Dylan620-20240130232600-Flux55-20240130230200","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20240211175800","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiCup_2024_February_newsletter-20240211175800","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20240211175800-WikiCup_2024_February_newsletter"],"text":"WikiCup 2024 February newsletter","linkableTitle":"WikiCup 2024 February newsletter"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20240211175800","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiCup_2024_February_newsletter-20240211175800","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20240211175800-WikiCup_2024_February_newsletter"],"text":"WikiCup 2024 February newsletter","linkableTitle":"WikiCup 2024 February newsletter"}-->
The 2024 WikiCup is off to a flying start, with 135 participants. This is the largest number of participants we have seen since 2017.
Our current leader is newcomer Generalissima (submissions), who has one FA on John Littlejohn (preacher) and 10 GAs and 12 DYKs mostly on New Zealand coinage and Inuit figures. Here are some more noteworthy scorers:
As a reminder, competitors may submit work for the first round until 23:59 (UTC) on 27 February, and the second round starts 1 March. Remember that only the top 64 scoring competitors will make it through to the second round; currently, competitors need at least 15 points to progress. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAN, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk·contribs), Epicgenius (talk·contribs), and Frostly (talk·contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:58, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240211175800","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20240211175800-WikiCup_2024_February_newsletter","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20240228004000","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiCup_2024_March_newsletter-20240228004000","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20240228004000-WikiCup_2024_March_newsletter"],"text":"WikiCup 2024 March newsletter","linkableTitle":"WikiCup 2024 March newsletter"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20240228004000","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiCup_2024_March_newsletter-20240228004000","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20240228004000-WikiCup_2024_March_newsletter"],"text":"WikiCup 2024 March newsletter","linkableTitle":"WikiCup 2024 March newsletter"}-->
The first round of the 2024 WikiCup ended at 23:59 (UTC) on 27 February. Everyone with at least 30 points moved on to Round 2, the highest number of points required to advance to the second round since 2014. Due to a six-way tie for the 64th-place spot, 67 contestants have qualified for Round 2.
The following scorers in Round 1 all scored more than 300 points:
Generalissima (submissions), who has 916 points mostly from one FA on John Littlejohn (preacher), 15 GAs, and 16 DYKs on a variety of topics including New Zealand coinage and Inuit figures, in addition to seven reviews
In this newsletter, the judges would like to pay a special tribute to Vami_IV (submissions), who unfortunately passed away this February. At the time of his death, he was the second-highest-scoring competitor. Outside the WikiCup, he had eight other featured articles, five A-class articles, eight other good articles, and two Four Awards. Vami also wrote an essay on completionism, a philosophy in which he deeply believed. If you can, please join us in honoring his memory by improving one of the articles on his to-do list.
Remember that any content promoted after 27 February but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240228004000","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20240228004000-WikiCup_2024_March_newsletter","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Dylan620-20240306230500","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Request_for_old_account\/doppelg\u00e4nger_blocks-20240306230500","replies":["c-Dylan620-20240306230500-Request_for_old_account\/doppelg\u00e4nger_blocks"],"text":"Request for old account\/doppelg\u00e4nger blocks","linkableTitle":"Request for old account\/doppelg\u00e4nger blocks"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Dylan620-20240306230500","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Request_for_old_account\/doppelg\u00e4nger_blocks-20240306230500","replies":["c-Dylan620-20240306230500-Request_for_old_account\/doppelg\u00e4nger_blocks"],"text":"Request for old account\/doppelg\u00e4nger blocks","linkableTitle":"Request for old account\/doppelg\u00e4nger blocks"}-->
This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.
The recent discovery that one of my colleagues was a sockpuppet has prompted me to reflect on old accounts for which I have no use, and from which there should be no edits. Please block the following accounts indefinitely:
Dylan620 III (talk·contribs) – I was 12 years old and somehow thought I needed an account for editing from my Wii. ("Dylan620 II" was later renamed to "Dylan620 public or mobile", which is my valid alt for editing from... well, yeah.)
Dylan620 Bot (talk·contribs) – I was 12 years old and somehow thought I could operate a bot despite having no programming knowledge whatsoever. (I also thought I could operate an adminbot despite not being an admin.)
Thank you very much, Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 23:05, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240306230500","author":"Dylan620","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Dylan620-20240306230500-Request_for_old_account\/doppelg\u00e4nger_blocks","replies":["c-Swarm-20240307051200-Dylan620-20240306230500"]}}-->
Done. Regards, ~Swarm~{sting}05:12, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240307051200","author":"Swarm","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Swarm-20240307051200-Dylan620-20240306230500","replies":[],"displayName":"~Swarm~"}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Ganesha811-20240311000300","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-DYK_for_Timeline_of_the_1993_Pacific_hurricane_season-20240311000300","replies":["c-Ganesha811-20240311000300-DYK_for_Timeline_of_the_1993_Pacific_hurricane_season"],"text":"DYK for Timeline of the 1993 Pacific hurricane season","linkableTitle":"DYK for Timeline of the 1993 Pacific hurricane season"}-->
DYK for Timeline of the 1993 Pacific hurricane season
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Ganesha811-20240311000300","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-DYK_for_Timeline_of_the_1993_Pacific_hurricane_season-20240311000300","replies":["c-Ganesha811-20240311000300-DYK_for_Timeline_of_the_1993_Pacific_hurricane_season"],"text":"DYK for Timeline of the 1993 Pacific hurricane season","linkableTitle":"DYK for Timeline of the 1993 Pacific hurricane season"}-->
—Ganesha811 (talk) 00:03, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240311000300","author":"Ganesha811","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Ganesha811-20240311000300-DYK_for_Timeline_of_the_1993_Pacific_hurricane_season","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-FACBot-20240316002600","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Promotion_of_Timeline_of_the_1991_Atlantic_hurricane_season-20240316002600","replies":["c-FACBot-20240316002600-Promotion_of_Timeline_of_the_1991_Atlantic_hurricane_season"],"text":"Promotion of Timeline of the 1991 Atlantic hurricane season","linkableTitle":"Promotion of Timeline of the 1991 Atlantic hurricane season"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-FACBot-20240316002600","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Promotion_of_Timeline_of_the_1991_Atlantic_hurricane_season-20240316002600","replies":["c-FACBot-20240316002600-Promotion_of_Timeline_of_the_1991_Atlantic_hurricane_season"],"text":"Promotion of Timeline of the 1991 Atlantic hurricane season","linkableTitle":"Promotion of Timeline of the 1991 Atlantic hurricane season"}-->
Congratulations, Dylan620! The list you nominated, Timeline of the 1991 Atlantic hurricane season, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, PresN (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240316002600","author":"FACBot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-FACBot-20240316002600-Promotion_of_Timeline_of_the_1991_Atlantic_hurricane_season","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-DPL_bot-20240325060400","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Disambiguation_link_notification_for_March_25-20240325060400","replies":["c-DPL_bot-20240325060400-Disambiguation_link_notification_for_March_25"],"text":"Disambiguation link notification for March 25","linkableTitle":"Disambiguation link notification for March 25"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-DPL_bot-20240325060400","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Disambiguation_link_notification_for_March_25-20240325060400","replies":["c-DPL_bot-20240325060400-Disambiguation_link_notification_for_March_25"],"text":"Disambiguation link notification for March 25","linkableTitle":"Disambiguation link notification for March 25"}-->
Hi Dylan :) I'm looking for people to interview here. Feel free to pass if you're not interested. Clovermoss🍀(talk)02:09, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240327020900","author":"Clovermoss","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Clovermoss-20240327020900-Editor_experience_invitation","replies":["c-Dylan620-20240327194600-Clovermoss-20240327020900"],"displayName":"Clovermoss\ud83c\udf40"}}-->
Hi Clovermoss, thank you for reaching out! I'll try to think of something to add in the near future :) Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 19:46, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240327194600","author":"Dylan620","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Dylan620-20240327194600-Clovermoss-20240327020900","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-The_Blue_Rider-20240331140100","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Your_GA_nomination_of_Not_Strong_Enough_(Boygenius_song)-20240331140100","replies":["c-The_Blue_Rider-20240331140100-Your_GA_nomination_of_Not_Strong_Enough_(Boygenius_song)"],"text":"Your GA nomination of Not Strong Enough (Boygenius song)","linkableTitle":"Your GA nomination of Not Strong Enough (Boygenius song)"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-The_Blue_Rider-20240331140100","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Your_GA_nomination_of_Not_Strong_Enough_(Boygenius_song)-20240331140100","replies":["c-The_Blue_Rider-20240331140100-Your_GA_nomination_of_Not_Strong_Enough_(Boygenius_song)"],"text":"Your GA nomination of Not Strong Enough (Boygenius song)","linkableTitle":"Your GA nomination of Not Strong Enough (Boygenius song)"}-->
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Not Strong Enough (Boygenius song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of The Blue Rider -- The Blue Rider (talk) 14:01, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240331140100","author":"The Blue Rider","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-The_Blue_Rider-20240331140100-Your_GA_nomination_of_Not_Strong_Enough_(Boygenius_song)","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20240412150500","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiCup_2024_April_newsletter-20240412150500","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20240412150500-WikiCup_2024_April_newsletter"],"text":"WikiCup 2024 April newsletter","linkableTitle":"WikiCup 2024 April newsletter"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20240412150500","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiCup_2024_April_newsletter-20240412150500","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20240412150500-WikiCup_2024_April_newsletter"],"text":"WikiCup 2024 April newsletter","linkableTitle":"WikiCup 2024 April newsletter"}-->
We are approaching the end of the 2024 WikiCup's second round, with a little over two weeks remaining. Currently, contestants must score at least 105 points to progress to the third round.
Competitors may submit work for the second round until the end of 28 April, and the third round starts 1 May. Remember that only competitors with the top 32 scores will make it through to the third round. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAN, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs. As a reminder, competitors are strictly prohibited from gaming Wikipedia policies or processes to receive more points.
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-FACBot-20240421002600","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Promotion_of_Timeline_of_the_1993_Pacific_hurricane_season-20240421002600","replies":["c-FACBot-20240421002600-Promotion_of_Timeline_of_the_1993_Pacific_hurricane_season"],"text":"Promotion of Timeline of the 1993 Pacific hurricane season","linkableTitle":"Promotion of Timeline of the 1993 Pacific hurricane season"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-FACBot-20240421002600","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Promotion_of_Timeline_of_the_1993_Pacific_hurricane_season-20240421002600","replies":["c-FACBot-20240421002600-Promotion_of_Timeline_of_the_1993_Pacific_hurricane_season"],"text":"Promotion of Timeline of the 1993 Pacific hurricane season","linkableTitle":"Promotion of Timeline of the 1993 Pacific hurricane season"}-->
Congratulations, Dylan620! The list you nominated, Timeline of the 1993 Pacific hurricane season, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, PresN (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240421002600","author":"FACBot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-FACBot-20240421002600-Promotion_of_Timeline_of_the_1993_Pacific_hurricane_season","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-RoySmith-20240422000400","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-DYK_for_Timeline_of_the_1994_Pacific_hurricane_season-20240422000400","replies":["c-RoySmith-20240422000400-DYK_for_Timeline_of_the_1994_Pacific_hurricane_season"],"text":"DYK for Timeline of the 1994 Pacific hurricane season","linkableTitle":"DYK for Timeline of the 1994 Pacific hurricane season"}-->
DYK for Timeline of the 1994 Pacific hurricane season
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-RoySmith-20240422000400","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-DYK_for_Timeline_of_the_1994_Pacific_hurricane_season-20240422000400","replies":["c-RoySmith-20240422000400-DYK_for_Timeline_of_the_1994_Pacific_hurricane_season"],"text":"DYK for Timeline of the 1994 Pacific hurricane season","linkableTitle":"DYK for Timeline of the 1994 Pacific hurricane season"}-->
RoySmith(talk)00:04, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240422000400","author":"RoySmith","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-RoySmith-20240422000400-DYK_for_Timeline_of_the_1994_Pacific_hurricane_season","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-The_Blue_Rider-20240422182200","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Your_GA_nomination_of_Not_Strong_Enough_(Boygenius_song)_2-20240422182200","replies":["c-The_Blue_Rider-20240422182200-Your_GA_nomination_of_Not_Strong_Enough_(Boygenius_song)_2"],"text":"Your GA nomination of Not Strong Enough (Boygenius song)","linkableTitle":"Your GA nomination of Not Strong Enough (Boygenius song) 2"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-The_Blue_Rider-20240422182200","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Your_GA_nomination_of_Not_Strong_Enough_(Boygenius_song)_2-20240422182200","replies":["c-The_Blue_Rider-20240422182200-Your_GA_nomination_of_Not_Strong_Enough_(Boygenius_song)_2"],"text":"Your GA nomination of Not Strong Enough (Boygenius song)","linkableTitle":"Your GA nomination of Not Strong Enough (Boygenius song) 2"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Giants2008-20240423013300","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-TFL_notification_for_May_2024-20240423013300","replies":["c-Giants2008-20240423013300-TFL_notification_for_May_2024"],"text":"TFL notification for May 2024","linkableTitle":"TFL notification for May 2024"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Giants2008-20240423013300","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-TFL_notification_for_May_2024-20240423013300","replies":["c-Giants2008-20240423013300-TFL_notification_for_May_2024"],"text":"TFL notification for May 2024","linkableTitle":"TFL notification for May 2024"}-->
Hi, Dylan620. I'm just posting to let you know that Timeline of the 1993 Pacific hurricane season – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for May 20. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 01:33, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240423013300","author":"Giants2008","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Giants2008-20240423013300-TFL_notification_for_May_2024","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20240429133700","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiCup_2024_May_newsletter-20240429133700","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20240429133700-WikiCup_2024_May_newsletter"],"text":"WikiCup 2024 May newsletter","linkableTitle":"WikiCup 2024 May newsletter"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20240429133700","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiCup_2024_May_newsletter-20240429133700","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20240429133700-WikiCup_2024_May_newsletter"],"text":"WikiCup 2024 May newsletter","linkableTitle":"WikiCup 2024 May newsletter"}-->
The second round of the 2024 WikiCup ended on 28 April. This round was particularly competitive: each of the 32 contestants who advanced to Round 3 scored at least 141 points. This is the highest number of points required to advance to Round 3 since 2014.
The following scorers in Round 2 all scored more than 500 points:
BennyOnTheLoose (submissions) with 548 points, mostly from a featured article about the snooker player John Pulman, two featured lists, and one good article;
The full scores for Round 2 can be seen here. So far this year, competitors have gotten 18 featured articles, 22 featured lists, and 186 good articles, 76 in the news credits and at least 200 did you know credits. They have conducted 165 featured article reviews, as well as 399 good article reviews and peer reviews, and have added 21 articles to featured topics and good topics.
Remember that any content promoted after 28 April but before the start of Round 3 can be claimed during Round 3, which starts on 1 May at 00:00 (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-4meter4-20240508014200","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-DYK_nomination_of_Timeline_of_the_1993_Atlantic_hurricane_season-20240508014200","replies":["c-4meter4-20240508014200-DYK_nomination_of_Timeline_of_the_1993_Atlantic_hurricane_season"],"text":"DYK nomination of Timeline of the 1993 Atlantic hurricane season","linkableTitle":"DYK nomination of Timeline of the 1993 Atlantic hurricane season"}-->
DYK nomination of Timeline of the 1993 Atlantic hurricane season
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-4meter4-20240508014200","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-DYK_nomination_of_Timeline_of_the_1993_Atlantic_hurricane_season-20240508014200","replies":["c-4meter4-20240508014200-DYK_nomination_of_Timeline_of_the_1993_Atlantic_hurricane_season"],"text":"DYK nomination of Timeline of the 1993 Atlantic hurricane season","linkableTitle":"DYK nomination of Timeline of the 1993 Atlantic hurricane season"}-->
Hello! Your submission of Timeline of the 1993 Atlantic hurricane season at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! 4meter4 (talk) 01:42, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240508014200","author":"4meter4","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-4meter4-20240508014200-DYK_nomination_of_Timeline_of_the_1993_Atlantic_hurricane_season","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-FACBot-20240517122700","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Promotion_of_Timeline_of_the_1994_Pacific_hurricane_season-20240517122700","replies":["c-FACBot-20240517122700-Promotion_of_Timeline_of_the_1994_Pacific_hurricane_season"],"text":"Promotion of Timeline of the 1994 Pacific hurricane season","linkableTitle":"Promotion of Timeline of the 1994 Pacific hurricane season"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-FACBot-20240517122700","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Promotion_of_Timeline_of_the_1994_Pacific_hurricane_season-20240517122700","replies":["c-FACBot-20240517122700-Promotion_of_Timeline_of_the_1994_Pacific_hurricane_season"],"text":"Promotion of Timeline of the 1994 Pacific hurricane season","linkableTitle":"Promotion of Timeline of the 1994 Pacific hurricane season"}-->
Congratulations, Dylan620! The list you nominated, Timeline of the 1994 Pacific hurricane season, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, PresN (talk) via FACBot (talk) 12:27, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240517122700","author":"FACBot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-FACBot-20240517122700-Promotion_of_Timeline_of_the_1994_Pacific_hurricane_season","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Amakuru-20240519000300","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-DYK_for_Not_Strong_Enough_(Boygenius_song)-20240519000300","replies":["c-Amakuru-20240519000300-DYK_for_Not_Strong_Enough_(Boygenius_song)"],"text":"DYK for Not Strong Enough (Boygenius song)","linkableTitle":"DYK for Not Strong Enough (Boygenius song)"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Amakuru-20240519000300","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-DYK_for_Not_Strong_Enough_(Boygenius_song)-20240519000300","replies":["c-Amakuru-20240519000300-DYK_for_Not_Strong_Enough_(Boygenius_song)"],"text":"DYK for Not Strong Enough (Boygenius song)","linkableTitle":"DYK for Not Strong Enough (Boygenius song)"}-->
— Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240519000300","author":"Amakuru","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Amakuru-20240519000300-DYK_for_Not_Strong_Enough_(Boygenius_song)","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Z1720-20240521000300","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-DYK_for_Timeline_of_the_1993_Atlantic_hurricane_season-20240521000300","replies":["c-Z1720-20240521000300-DYK_for_Timeline_of_the_1993_Atlantic_hurricane_season"],"text":"DYK for Timeline of the 1993 Atlantic hurricane season","linkableTitle":"DYK for Timeline of the 1993 Atlantic hurricane season"}-->
DYK for Timeline of the 1993 Atlantic hurricane season
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Z1720-20240521000300","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-DYK_for_Timeline_of_the_1993_Atlantic_hurricane_season-20240521000300","replies":["c-Z1720-20240521000300-DYK_for_Timeline_of_the_1993_Atlantic_hurricane_season"],"text":"DYK for Timeline of the 1993 Atlantic hurricane season","linkableTitle":"DYK for Timeline of the 1993 Atlantic hurricane season"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-GMH_Melbourne-20240608090400","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WP:GARC:_Invitation_to_review_Windswept_Adan-20240608090400","replies":["c-GMH_Melbourne-20240608090400-WP:GARC:_Invitation_to_review_Windswept_Adan"],"text":"WP:GARC: Invitation to review Windswept Adan","linkableTitle":"WP:GARC: Invitation to review Windswept Adan"}-->
Hello Dylan620, You have been paired at good article review circles to review Windswept Adan. At the same time, SupremeLordBagel, will be reviewing the article you nominated. Please wait 24 hours or until all users have accepted their nomination before starting your review in case a user in your circle decides to decline their invite.
GMH Melbourne (talk) 09:04, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240608090400","author":"GMH Melbourne","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-GMH_Melbourne-20240608090400-WP:GARC:_Invitation_to_review_Windswept_Adan","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-FACBot-20240615002600","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Promotion_of_Timeline_of_the_1993_Atlantic_hurricane_season-20240615002600","replies":["c-FACBot-20240615002600-Promotion_of_Timeline_of_the_1993_Atlantic_hurricane_season"],"text":"Promotion of Timeline of the 1993 Atlantic hurricane season","linkableTitle":"Promotion of Timeline of the 1993 Atlantic hurricane season"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-FACBot-20240615002600","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Promotion_of_Timeline_of_the_1993_Atlantic_hurricane_season-20240615002600","replies":["c-FACBot-20240615002600-Promotion_of_Timeline_of_the_1993_Atlantic_hurricane_season"],"text":"Promotion of Timeline of the 1993 Atlantic hurricane season","linkableTitle":"Promotion of Timeline of the 1993 Atlantic hurricane season"}-->
Congratulations, Dylan620! The list you nominated, Timeline of the 1993 Atlantic hurricane season, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, PresN (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240615002600","author":"FACBot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-FACBot-20240615002600-Promotion_of_Timeline_of_the_1993_Atlantic_hurricane_season","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-FACBot-20240620002600","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Promotion_of_Timeline_of_the_2002_Pacific_hurricane_season-20240620002600","replies":["c-FACBot-20240620002600-Promotion_of_Timeline_of_the_2002_Pacific_hurricane_season"],"text":"Promotion of Timeline of the 2002 Pacific hurricane season","linkableTitle":"Promotion of Timeline of the 2002 Pacific hurricane season"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-FACBot-20240620002600","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Promotion_of_Timeline_of_the_2002_Pacific_hurricane_season-20240620002600","replies":["c-FACBot-20240620002600-Promotion_of_Timeline_of_the_2002_Pacific_hurricane_season"],"text":"Promotion of Timeline of the 2002 Pacific hurricane season","linkableTitle":"Promotion of Timeline of the 2002 Pacific hurricane season"}-->
Congratulations, Dylan620! The list you nominated, Timeline of the 2002 Pacific hurricane season, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, PresN (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240620002600","author":"FACBot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-FACBot-20240620002600-Promotion_of_Timeline_of_the_2002_Pacific_hurricane_season","replies":[]}}-->
Hey there Dylan! I just wanted to let you know that I nominated Hurricane Hilary for FAC, which you reviewed for GAN. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 05:07, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240623050700","author":"Hurricanehink","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Hurricanehink-20240623050700-Hurricane_Hilary","replies":["c-Dylan620-20240623192800-Hurricanehink-20240623050700"]}}-->
@Hurricanehink: Coolio, great to see another tropical cyclone at FAC – and I see it's going pretty well! I'll give the article another read-through tomorrow and see if there's any more feedback I can add. Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 19:28, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240623192800","author":"Dylan620","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Dylan620-20240623192800-Hurricanehink-20240623050700","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20240629213000","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiCup_2024_July_newsletter-20240629213000","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20240629213000-WikiCup_2024_July_newsletter"],"text":"WikiCup 2024 July newsletter","linkableTitle":"WikiCup 2024 July newsletter"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20240629213000","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiCup_2024_July_newsletter-20240629213000","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20240629213000-WikiCup_2024_July_newsletter"],"text":"WikiCup 2024 July newsletter","linkableTitle":"WikiCup 2024 July newsletter"}-->
The third round of the 2024 WikiCup ended on 28 June. As with Round 2, this round was competitive: each of the 16 contestants who advanced to Round 4 scored at least 256 points.
The following editors all scored more than 400 points in Round 3:
Sammi Brie (submissions) with 557 points, mostly from 1 featured article on KNXV-TV, 5 good articles, and 8 did you know nominations; and
AryKun (submissions) with 415 points, mostly from 1 featured article on Great cuckoo-dove, with a high number of bonus points from that article.
The full scores for round 3 can be seen here. So far this year, competitors have gotten 28 featured articles, 38 featured lists, 240 good articles, 92 in the news credits, and at least 285 did you know credits. They have conducted 279 featured article reviews, as well as 492 good article reviews and peer reviews, and have added 22 articles to featured topics and good topics.
Remember that any content promoted after 28 June but before the start of Round 4 can be claimed during Round 4, which starts on 1 July at 00:00 (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether for a good article, featured content, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Premeditated_Chaos-20240717000500","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-DYK_for_Ghost_in_the_Machine_(song)-20240717000500","replies":["c-Premeditated_Chaos-20240717000500-DYK_for_Ghost_in_the_Machine_(song)"],"text":"DYK for Ghost in the Machine (song)","linkableTitle":"DYK for Ghost in the Machine (song)"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Premeditated_Chaos-20240717000500","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-DYK_for_Ghost_in_the_Machine_(song)-20240717000500","replies":["c-Premeditated_Chaos-20240717000500-DYK_for_Ghost_in_the_Machine_(song)"],"text":"DYK for Ghost in the Machine (song)","linkableTitle":"DYK for Ghost in the Machine (song)"}-->
♠PMC♠ (talk)00:05, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240717000500","author":"Premeditated Chaos","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Premeditated_Chaos-20240717000500-DYK_for_Ghost_in_the_Machine_(song)","replies":[],"displayName":"PMC"}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-WeatherWriter-20240717162300","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-List_of_F5_and_EF5_tornadoes_Improvement_Time!-20240717162300","replies":["c-WeatherWriter-20240717162300-List_of_F5_and_EF5_tornadoes_Improvement_Time!"],"text":"List of F5 and EF5 tornadoes Improvement Time!","linkableTitle":"List of F5 and EF5 tornadoes Improvement Time!"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-WeatherWriter-20240717162300","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-List_of_F5_and_EF5_tornadoes_Improvement_Time!-20240717162300","replies":["c-WeatherWriter-20240717162300-List_of_F5_and_EF5_tornadoes_Improvement_Time!"],"text":"List of F5 and EF5 tornadoes Improvement Time!","linkableTitle":"List of F5 and EF5 tornadoes Improvement Time!"}-->
Hello there! I am sending this alert to all members of the WikiProject Weather and editors who have recently edited in the realm of tornadoes.
There is a large and important discussion ongoing, with the goal to completely overhaul and improve the List of F5 and EF5 tornadoes. The previous improvement attempt back in 2022/2023 gained almost no participation. This alert is being sent out so these discussions hopefully gain a reasonably-sized participation, so the F5/EF5 tornado article, one of the most viewed weather-related articles on Wikipedia, can be improved for all readers!
By the authority vested in me by myself it gives me great pleasure to present you with this award in recognition of the thorough, detailed and actionable reviews you have carried out at FAC. This work is very much appreciated. Gog the Mild (talk) 21:46, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240729214600","author":"Gog the Mild","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Gog_the_Mild-20240729214600-In_appreciation","replies":["c-Dylan620-20240729234500-Gog_the_Mild-20240729214600"]}}-->
Thank you, Gog, that's very kind of you :) Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 23:45, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240729234500","author":"Dylan620","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Dylan620-20240729234500-Gog_the_Mild-20240729214600","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-FACBot-20240803120500","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Promotion_of_Ghost_in_the_Machine_(song)-20240803120500","replies":["c-FACBot-20240803120500-Promotion_of_Ghost_in_the_Machine_(song)"],"text":"Promotion of Ghost in the Machine (song)","linkableTitle":"Promotion of Ghost in the Machine (song)"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-FACBot-20240803120500","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Promotion_of_Ghost_in_the_Machine_(song)-20240803120500","replies":["c-FACBot-20240803120500-Promotion_of_Ghost_in_the_Machine_(song)"],"text":"Promotion of Ghost in the Machine (song)","linkableTitle":"Promotion of Ghost in the Machine (song)"}-->
Congratulations, Dylan620! The article you nominated, Ghost in the Machine (song), has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, FrB.TG (talk) via FACBot (talk) 12:05, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240803120500","author":"FACBot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-FACBot-20240803120500-Promotion_of_Ghost_in_the_Machine_(song)","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Trainsandotherthings-20240807211400","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-A_barnstar_for_you!_3-20240807211400","replies":["c-Trainsandotherthings-20240807211400-A_barnstar_for_you!_3"],"text":"A barnstar for you!","linkableTitle":"A barnstar for you! 3"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Trainsandotherthings-20240807211400","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-A_barnstar_for_you!_3-20240807211400","replies":["c-Trainsandotherthings-20240807211400-A_barnstar_for_you!_3"],"text":"A barnstar for you!","linkableTitle":"A barnstar for you! 3"}-->
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
Thank you very much for your generous assistance at FAC, which you offered unsolicited. The nomination is going to be archived, but that you took the time to help me really made a difference to me. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 21:14, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240807211400","author":"Trainsandotherthings","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Trainsandotherthings-20240807211400-A_barnstar_for_you!_3","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-FACBot-20240808002500","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Promotion_of_Timeline_of_the_2014_Pacific_hurricane_season-20240808002500","replies":["c-FACBot-20240808002500-Promotion_of_Timeline_of_the_2014_Pacific_hurricane_season"],"text":"Promotion of Timeline of the 2014 Pacific hurricane season","linkableTitle":"Promotion of Timeline of the 2014 Pacific hurricane season"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-FACBot-20240808002500","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Promotion_of_Timeline_of_the_2014_Pacific_hurricane_season-20240808002500","replies":["c-FACBot-20240808002500-Promotion_of_Timeline_of_the_2014_Pacific_hurricane_season"],"text":"Promotion of Timeline of the 2014 Pacific hurricane season","linkableTitle":"Promotion of Timeline of the 2014 Pacific hurricane season"}-->
Congratulations, Dylan620! The list you nominated, Timeline of the 2014 Pacific hurricane season, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Hey man im josh (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240808002500","author":"FACBot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-FACBot-20240808002500-Promotion_of_Timeline_of_the_2014_Pacific_hurricane_season","replies":[]}}-->
Hello, Dylan620. You have new messages at Talk:Typhoon Ewiniar (2024). Message added 09:32, 10 August 2024 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-JCMLuis-20240823175700","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Help_with_timeline_draft-20240823175700","replies":["c-JCMLuis-20240823175700-Help_with_timeline_draft"],"text":"Help with timeline draft","linkableTitle":"Help with timeline draft"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-JCMLuis-20240823175700","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Help_with_timeline_draft-20240823175700","replies":["c-JCMLuis-20240823175700-Help_with_timeline_draft"],"text":"Help with timeline draft","linkableTitle":"Help with timeline draft"}-->
Hello. I have been looking at the Pacific hurricane season timelines that you've been making and promoting to FL. It had inspired me to start a draft on the timeline of the 2019 Pacific typhoon season in an attempt to make my first FL. The problem is that there has never been a Pacific typhoon season timeline that has been promoted to FL, so I had to base the timeline off other timelines of different basins. I have finished the timeline of events (besides a few missing landfalls) and just need to add images to it.
I was wondering if you have any suggestions on what the draft should be like, while also considering the amount of systems and events during the season. I would also greatly appreciate you editing the draft, but I'll leave that up to you. —JCMLuis💬17:57, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240823175700","author":"JCMLuis","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-JCMLuis-20240823175700-Help_with_timeline_draft","replies":["c-Dylan620-20240824014600-JCMLuis-20240823175700"]}}-->
@JCMLuis: It is heartwarming that my work has inspired you :,) I'd love to lend a hand with the draft! I should have some time to look at it over the weekend or on Monday. It's great that you've chosen to do this with a WPAC season, precisely because there hasn't been a WPAC timeline FL yet; I think it's exciting to establish a first of its kind, plus the WPAC regularly sees high amounts of activity and impact. Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 01:46, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240824014600","author":"Dylan620","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Dylan620-20240824014600-JCMLuis-20240823175700","replies":["c-Dylan620-20240828210400-Dylan620-20240824014600"]}}-->
@JCMLuis: So I've been reading over the timeline (and making a few minor tweaks to the lede) and I have a few comments. There are some words and other details that I think should be added, but the overall format is very good and in line with what I would expect from a timeline FL. I do question whether the ACE should be mentioned. 276.8 units is a high number on the face of it, but the climatological average is 299.6 units according to this, so the 2019 seasonal total is actually near par for the basin. I mentioned the ACE in the ledes of the 1993, 1994, and 2014 EPAC timelines because those three seasons were particularly active in terms of ACE, all placing in the top 11 for the basin; the 2002 EPAC season was fair-to-middling in terms of ACE, so I chose not to mention it in that season's timeline. I also think that the JMA's "very strong" and "violent" categories should be integrated into the timeline itself, since they are included in the colorization scheme for the timeline graph. I'll try to help out with these (and adding more images) in the coming days. Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 21:04, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240828210400","author":"Dylan620","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Dylan620-20240828210400-Dylan620-20240824014600","replies":["c-JCMLuis-20240920172500-Dylan620-20240828210400"]}}-->
Alright (sorry for the very late response after almost a month), so I have included the other JMA categories in the timeline and removed the sentence about the ACE. I have also added the missing landfalls, so the timeline of events should be truly finished. I was wondering, has the JMA ever added the "Very Strong" or "Violent" label onto the typhoons' names? (Like Very Strong Typhoon Bualoi) I don't recall seeing the JMA ever do that, so I left the categories unchanged in the timeline of events. But I feel it could confuse the reader by saying that a typhoon had weakened into a typhoon. Like for example:
Wutip was a very strong typhoon before weakening into just a typhoon, so would I reword the events to say something like "Typhoon Wutip (02W) has weakened from a very strong typhoon into a typhoon," or would I add the "Very Strong" or "Violent" label onto the storm's name? —JCMLuis💬17:25, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240920172500","author":"JCMLuis","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-JCMLuis-20240920172500-Dylan620-20240828210400","replies":["c-Dylan620-20240922004400-JCMLuis-20240920172500"]}}-->
@JCMLuis: Hmmmm, that's an interesting issue. I know that when the JMA issues advisories on "regular" typhoons, or if a system is forecast to be one, they put the "Strong" qualifier for the system's intensity. It is also listed here under the "Categorization in Japan" column, though it is omitted from the "International Categorization" column and from this page. I agree that Typhoon Wutip (02W) has weakened into a typhoon could be confusing. I think your weakened from a very strong typhoon into a typhoon wording could work, though I might want to raise the issue with the "strong typhoon vs. plain ol' typhoon" discrepancy on the WPTC talk page. I would avoid adding the "very strong" or "violent" labels to the storms' names, as I have never seen them do that like they do with severe tropical storms; to use examples from the current season, Severe Tropical Storm Prapiroon would be accurate, but Violent Typhoon Yagi wouldn't work even though it is technically correct. Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 00:44, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240922004400","author":"Dylan620","type":"comment","level":5,"id":"c-Dylan620-20240922004400-JCMLuis-20240920172500","replies":["c-JCMLuis-20241002163500-Dylan620-20240922004400"]}}-->
What I have done is changed the wording and wikilinked the categories to the list of storms of that category, so I don't think there should be much confusion anymore. Now I need help with the images. I'm not sure what satellite images or tracks to include or exclude, since the Western Pacific basin is more active than the others. Isn't there a policy about too many images, even if all of them are located to the right? I'll also need help with the alternative text since I can't describe the images really well. (I don't want to go the basic route of "A satellite image of a tropical storm over the Pacific Ocean" or "A track of a Pacific typhoon" or something like that) —JCMLuis💬16:35, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20241002163500","author":"JCMLuis","type":"comment","level":6,"id":"c-JCMLuis-20241002163500-Dylan620-20240922004400","replies":["c-Dylan620-20241002212000-JCMLuis-20241002163500","c-Dylan620-20241002215900-JCMLuis-20241002163500"]}}-->
@JCMLuis: Those changes look good to me! As for the images, I don't think there's a concrete policy about having too many images in an article, but there does come a point where an excessive number of images can hinder an article's readability and lessen its overall quality. Generally, I think tropical cyclone season timelines should represent as many systems as possible – ideally, all of them – with either a track map, a satellite image, or both, as long as the images aren't packed too closely together. This is something I've tried to do with the timelines I've pushed through FLC this year (2011 EPAC being the most recent). That being said, some of the images in the draft do seem to be a bit close together, which appears to be the result of a few short-lived and/or weak systems – such as Sepat, Danas, and Mun – being represented by both satellite images and track maps. I would recommend choosing to keep either the track maps or the satellite images for such systems, perhaps leaning toward keeping the satellite images if you can find any breakpoints that could be used as location references in the text. For instance, the JTWC's report on the 2019 season mentions Palau and Osaka in the context of Sepat (94W). Another thing I noticed is that Sepat continues to be referred to as "Sepat (Dodong)" long after it has exited the PAR; I would recommend mentioning when Dodong left the PAR (this information can be found in PAGASA's report on the 2019 season) and referring to it as just Sepat and/or 94W outside the PAR. Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 21:20, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20241002212000","author":"Dylan620","type":"comment","level":7,"id":"c-Dylan620-20241002212000-JCMLuis-20241002163500","replies":[]}}-->
Forgot to say this when I initially replied, but I'll try to help out with alt texts this week. Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 21:59, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20241002215900","author":"Dylan620","type":"comment","level":7,"id":"c-Dylan620-20241002215900-JCMLuis-20241002163500","replies":["c-JCMLuis-20241021175200-Dylan620-20241002215900"]}}-->
Seems that you have done the alt texts. (along with some formatting and adding JTWC pressure estimates) Yeah I would have never come up with any of them. Thank you so much! One issue I'd like to address before nominating for FL is Matmo's landfall. I could not find any source saying when the storm made landfall, so I used IBTrACS for that, but I don't think that it is the exact time. There is a source that says that it is forecasted to make landfall at 16:00 local time, but I don't think that counts. —JCMLuis💬17:52, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20241021175200","author":"JCMLuis","type":"comment","level":8,"id":"c-JCMLuis-20241021175200-Dylan620-20241002215900","replies":["c-Dylan620-20241021223700-JCMLuis-20241021175200"]}}-->
@JCMLuis: No problem! I'm glad I could help. Yeah, I would recommend against using a forecast source for this information, given that tropical cyclones can move a little slower or faster than predicted and that operational landfall times can be tweaked in reanalysis after the season is over. I think it's reasonable under the circumstances to use IBTrACS as the source for the timing of Matmo's landfall. Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 22:37, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20241021223700","author":"Dylan620","type":"comment","level":9,"id":"c-Dylan620-20241021223700-JCMLuis-20241021175200","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20240830031200","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiCup_2024_August_newsletter-20240830031200","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20240830031200-WikiCup_2024_August_newsletter"],"text":"WikiCup 2024 August newsletter","linkableTitle":"WikiCup 2024 August newsletter"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20240830031200","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiCup_2024_August_newsletter-20240830031200","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20240830031200-WikiCup_2024_August_newsletter"],"text":"WikiCup 2024 August newsletter","linkableTitle":"WikiCup 2024 August newsletter"}-->
The fourth round of the 2024 WikiCup ended on 29 August. Each of the 8 contestants who advanced to Round 4 scored at least 472 points, and the following contestants scored more than 700 points:
Congratulations to our eight finalists and all who participated. Contestants put in extraordinary amounts of effort during this round, and their scores can be seen here. So far this year, competitors have gotten 36 featured articles, 55 featured lists, 15 good articles, 93 in the news credits, and at least 333 did you know credits. They have conducted 357 featured content reviews, as well as 553 good article reviews and peer reviews, and have added 30 articles to featured topics and good topics.
Any content promoted after 29 August but before the start of Round 5 can be claimed during Round 5, which starts on 1 September at 00:00 (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. If two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether for a good article, featured content, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Remember to claim your points within 14 days of earning them, and importantly, before the deadline on 31 October.
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-The_Herald-20240915030200","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Happy_First_Edit_Day!_4-20240915030200","replies":["c-The_Herald-20240915030200-Happy_First_Edit_Day!_4"],"text":"Happy First Edit Day!","linkableTitle":"Happy First Edit Day! 4"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-The_Herald-20240915030200","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Happy_First_Edit_Day!_4-20240915030200","replies":["c-The_Herald-20240915030200-Happy_First_Edit_Day!_4"],"text":"Happy First Edit Day!","linkableTitle":"Happy First Edit Day! 4"}-->
Happy First Edit Day! Hi Dylan620! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! The Herald (Benison) (talk) 03:02, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240915030200","author":"The Herald","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-The_Herald-20240915030200-Happy_First_Edit_Day!_4","replies":[],"displayName":"The Herald (Benison)"}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-FACBot-20240916002700","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Promotion_of_Timeline_of_the_1995_Pacific_hurricane_season-20240916002700","replies":["c-FACBot-20240916002700-Promotion_of_Timeline_of_the_1995_Pacific_hurricane_season"],"text":"Promotion of Timeline of the 1995 Pacific hurricane season","linkableTitle":"Promotion of Timeline of the 1995 Pacific hurricane season"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-FACBot-20240916002700","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Promotion_of_Timeline_of_the_1995_Pacific_hurricane_season-20240916002700","replies":["c-FACBot-20240916002700-Promotion_of_Timeline_of_the_1995_Pacific_hurricane_season"],"text":"Promotion of Timeline of the 1995 Pacific hurricane season","linkableTitle":"Promotion of Timeline of the 1995 Pacific hurricane season"}-->
Congratulations, Dylan620! The list you nominated, Timeline of the 1995 Pacific hurricane season, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, PresN (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:27, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240916002700","author":"FACBot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-FACBot-20240916002700-Promotion_of_Timeline_of_the_1995_Pacific_hurricane_season","replies":[]}}-->
Hello, Dylan620. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Fallen Crimson, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:31, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240918153100","author":"FireflyBot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-FireflyBot-20240918153100-Concern_regarding_Draft:The_Fallen_Crimson","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-FACBot-20240920002600","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Promotion_of_Timeline_of_the_2011_Pacific_hurricane_season-20240920002600","replies":["c-FACBot-20240920002600-Promotion_of_Timeline_of_the_2011_Pacific_hurricane_season"],"text":"Promotion of Timeline of the 2011 Pacific hurricane season","linkableTitle":"Promotion of Timeline of the 2011 Pacific hurricane season"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-FACBot-20240920002600","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Promotion_of_Timeline_of_the_2011_Pacific_hurricane_season-20240920002600","replies":["c-FACBot-20240920002600-Promotion_of_Timeline_of_the_2011_Pacific_hurricane_season"],"text":"Promotion of Timeline of the 2011 Pacific hurricane season","linkableTitle":"Promotion of Timeline of the 2011 Pacific hurricane season"}-->
Congratulations, Dylan620! The list you nominated, Timeline of the 2011 Pacific hurricane season, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Hey man im josh (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240920002600","author":"FACBot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-FACBot-20240920002600-Promotion_of_Timeline_of_the_2011_Pacific_hurricane_season","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20241101134800","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiCup_2024_November_newsletter-20241101134800","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20241101134800-WikiCup_2024_November_newsletter"],"text":"WikiCup 2024 November newsletter","linkableTitle":"WikiCup 2024 November newsletter"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20241101134800","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiCup_2024_November_newsletter-20241101134800","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20241101134800-WikiCup_2024_November_newsletter"],"text":"WikiCup 2024 November newsletter","linkableTitle":"WikiCup 2024 November newsletter"}-->
The 2024 WikiCup has come to an end, with the final round being a very tight race. Our new champion is AirshipJungleman29 (submissions), who scored 2,283 points mainly through 3 high-multiplier FAs and 3 GAs on military history topics. By a 1% margin, Airship beat out last year's champion, BeanieFan11 (submissions), who scored second with 2,264 points, mainly from an impressive 58 GAs about athletes. In third place, Generalissima (submissions) scored 1,528 points, primarily from two FAs on U.S. Librarians of Congress and 20 GAs about various historical topics. Our other finalists are: Sammi Brie (submissions) with 879 points, Hey man im josh (submissions) with 533 points, BennyOnTheLoose (submissions) with 432 points, Arconning (submissions) with 244 points, and AryKun (submissions) with 15 points. Congratulations to our finalists and all who participated!
The final round was very productive, and contestants had 7 FAs, 9 FLs, 94 GAs, 73 FAC reviews, and 79 GAN reviews and peer reviews. Altogether, Wikipedia has benefited greatly from the activities of WikiCup competitors all through the contest. Well done everyone!
All those who reached the final will receive awards and the following special awards will be made, based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, these prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round, or in the event of a tie, to the overall leader in this field.
Generalissima (submissions) wins the featured article prize for 3 FAs in round 4, and 7 FAs overall.
Muboshgu (submissions) wins the ITN prize, for 15 In the news articles in round 1, and 36 overall.
Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2025 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement!
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-PSA-20241109022900","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Peer_review_for_Snooze_(song)-20241109022900","replies":["c-PSA-20241109022900-Peer_review_for_Snooze_(song)"],"text":"Peer review for Snooze (song)","linkableTitle":"Peer review for Snooze (song)"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-PSA-20241109022900","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Peer_review_for_Snooze_(song)-20241109022900","replies":["c-PSA-20241109022900-Peer_review_for_Snooze_(song)"],"text":"Peer review for Snooze (song)","linkableTitle":"Peer review for Snooze (song)"}-->
It's been a while, dylan! I asked you a while back offwiki if you can have a good look at Snooze (song), but someone else beat you to it :P the offer is still up! I have opened a peer review here where you can leave more in-depth comments about the article. Thanks, Elias / PSA 🏕️🪐 [please make some noise]02:29, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20241109022900","author":"PSA","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-PSA-20241109022900-Peer_review_for_Snooze_(song)","replies":["c-Dylan620-20241109221700-PSA-20241109022900"],"displayName":"Elias \/ PSA"}}-->
Hi Elias! I was actually just about to dib the GAN when I saw someone else had already done so, heh. I'll give the article a look in the next two to three days! Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 22:17, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20241109221700","author":"Dylan620","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Dylan620-20241109221700-PSA-20241109022900","replies":[]}}-->
Hey Dylan620, seeing as you created the timeline for the season, I wondered if you wanted to nominate the season for good topic status? There are only four articles - the main article, timeline, Hernan, and Kenna - but all are still good enough. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 20:55, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20241117205500","author":"Hurricanehink","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Hurricanehink-20241117205500-2002_Pacific_hurricane_season","replies":["c-Dylan620-20241117214900-Hurricanehink-20241117205500"]}}-->
Hi there HH – yes, that sounds great to me! Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 21:49, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20241117214900","author":"Dylan620","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Dylan620-20241117214900-Hurricanehink-20241117205500","replies":["c-Hurricanehink-20241117215400-Dylan620-20241117214900"]}}-->
Cool! So first off, how do you think the articles are? Kenna is featured still, and at quick glance I think it might be OK. I'm not sure about Hernan. Do you think it should stay as an article? The season article is still very much on the short side. Or is it perhaps too short, and the season article is the problem article? Just spitballing. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 21:54, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20241117215400","author":"Hurricanehink","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Hurricanehink-20241117215400-Dylan620-20241117214900","replies":["c-Dylan620-20241120230300-Hurricanehink-20241117215400"]}}-->
@Hurricanehink: Apologies for the late reply – it's been a busy, sleep-deprived past couple days in meatspace. I alluded to this in the merge discussion for Hernan, but yeah, there's definitely quite a bit of room to expand the season article. I don't see any information about pre-season forecasts – how did reality match up with expectations? Some storm sections could also be beefed up; Alma's in particular sticks out as quite short for a major hurricane, especially one that occurred in May, which isn't exactly common. By contrast, Elida's section might be too long, though I suspect that this is due to some information being sourced to operational advisories. Even so, it's currently 393 words longer than the section for Kenna, which to me seems to lend undue weight to Elida. I also think the lede could probably do with some expansion and/or slight restructuring, as it reads... not badly by any means, but just a little haphazardly. As for Kenna's article, I'll need to read it more thoroughly in the coming days, but I agree with you that there are no red flags at first glance. Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 23:03, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20241120230300","author":"Dylan620","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Dylan620-20241120230300-Hurricanehink-20241117215400","replies":["c-Hurricanehink-20241121032100-Dylan620-20241120230300"]}}-->
Yea the season does seem to be lacking a little bit. I agree that Elida focused too much on operational advisories, so that'll be an easy fix. No worries about the late reply, just glad to hear back. I guess we'll reconvene once/if Hernan is merged to reassess? ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 03:21, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20241121032100","author":"Hurricanehink","type":"comment","level":5,"id":"c-Hurricanehink-20241121032100-Dylan620-20241120230300","replies":["c-Dylan620-20241122133600-Hurricanehink-20241121032100"]}}-->
@Hurricanehink: That works for me. In the meantime I might try to start expanding some of the other storm sections. Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 13:36, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20241122133600","author":"Dylan620","type":"comment","level":6,"id":"c-Dylan620-20241122133600-Hurricanehink-20241121032100","replies":["c-Hurricanehink-20241122194700-Dylan620-20241122133600"]}}-->
Good idea, like Alma should definitely be longer as you mentioned. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 19:47, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20241122194700","author":"Hurricanehink","type":"comment","level":7,"id":"c-Hurricanehink-20241122194700-Dylan620-20241122133600","replies":[]}}-->
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20241119001600","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20241119001600-ArbCom_2024_Elections_voter_message","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Sunsetcityy-20241206025400","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Some_stroopwafels_for_you!_2-20241206025400","replies":["c-Sunsetcityy-20241206025400-Some_stroopwafels_for_you!_2"],"text":"Some stroopwafels for you!","linkableTitle":"Some stroopwafels for you! 2"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Sunsetcityy-20241206025400","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Some_stroopwafels_for_you!_2-20241206025400","replies":["c-Sunsetcityy-20241206025400-Some_stroopwafels_for_you!_2"],"text":"Some stroopwafels for you!","linkableTitle":"Some stroopwafels for you! 2"}-->
hello, wanted to thank you for all your cool edits u make lol! Sunsetcityy (talk) 02:54, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20241206025400","author":"Sunsetcityy","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Sunsetcityy-20241206025400-Some_stroopwafels_for_you!_2","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Sunsetcityy-20241206025400","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Some_stroopwafels_for_you!_3-20241206025400","replies":["c-Sunsetcityy-20241206025400-Some_stroopwafels_for_you!_3"],"text":"Some stroopwafels for you!","linkableTitle":"Some stroopwafels for you! 3"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Sunsetcityy-20241206025400","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Some_stroopwafels_for_you!_3-20241206025400","replies":["c-Sunsetcityy-20241206025400-Some_stroopwafels_for_you!_3"],"text":"Some stroopwafels for you!","linkableTitle":"Some stroopwafels for you! 3"}-->
hello, wanted to thank you for all your cool edits u make lol! Sunsetcityy (talk) 02:54, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20241206025400","author":"Sunsetcityy","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Sunsetcityy-20241206025400-Some_stroopwafels_for_you!_3","replies":["c-Dylan620-20241206133600-Sunsetcityy-20241206025400"]}}-->
@Sunsetcityy: Om nom nom! Delicious! Many thanks, and happy editing :) Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 13:36, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20241206133600","author":"Dylan620","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Dylan620-20241206133600-Sunsetcityy-20241206025400","replies":[]}}-->
Thanks for uploading File:Modest Mouse - Interstate 8.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:48, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20241206034800","author":"B-bot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-B-bot-20241206034800-Orphaned_non-free_image_File:Modest_Mouse_-_Interstate_8.jpg","replies":[]}}-->
At quick glance the list looks pretty good. I'm in the middle of a bunch of real world projects, so I can't do much on Wikipedia these days. I'm not a fan of timeline articles in general, as I feel they're pretty redundant with the main season article, so I hope you don't mind if I miss out on this FLC, as there are more important fish storms to fry, so to speak :P ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:41, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20241206184100","author":"Hurricanehink","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Hurricanehink-20241206184100-Re:_2004","replies":["c-Dylan620-20241212224100-Hurricanehink-20241206184100"]}}-->
That's fair, Hurricanehink, I can certainly relate on that front. I hope everything's going well IRL! Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 22:41, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20241212224100","author":"Dylan620","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Dylan620-20241212224100-Hurricanehink-20241206184100","replies":["c-Hurricanehink-20241212225300-Dylan620-20241212224100"]}}-->
Thanks, yea I'm producing an original musical in a few months, so it's requiring a lot of time that otherwise might go toward wiki :P ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 22:53, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20241212225300","author":"Hurricanehink","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Hurricanehink-20241212225300-Dylan620-20241212224100","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-JCMLuis-20241211134800","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-A_barnstar_for_you!_4-20241211134800","replies":["c-JCMLuis-20241211134800-A_barnstar_for_you!_4"],"text":"A barnstar for you!","linkableTitle":"A barnstar for you! 4"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-JCMLuis-20241211134800","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-A_barnstar_for_you!_4-20241211134800","replies":["c-JCMLuis-20241211134800-A_barnstar_for_you!_4"],"text":"A barnstar for you!","linkableTitle":"A barnstar for you! 4"}-->
The Special Barnstar
For your many contributions to hurricane season timelines and also for helping me in making the first ever Pacific typhoon season timeline featured list. —JCMLuis💬13:48, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20241211134800","author":"JCMLuis","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-JCMLuis-20241211134800-A_barnstar_for_you!_4","replies":["c-Dylan620-20241212223800-JCMLuis-20241211134800"]}}-->
@JCMLuis: Awww, thank you! And I'm very happy to hear that the FLC for the 2019 typhoon season timeline passed – congrats on setting a milestone! Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 22:38, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20241212223800","author":"Dylan620","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Dylan620-20241212223800-JCMLuis-20241211134800","replies":[]}}-->