Let be a category, let and be objects of , and let have all binary products with . An object together with a morphism is an exponential object if for any object and morphism there is a unique morphism (called the transpose of ) such that the following diagram commutes:
If exists for all objects in , then the functor defined on objects by and on arrows by , is a right adjoint to the product functor . For this reason, the morphisms and are sometimes called exponential adjoints of one another.[3]
Equational definition
Alternatively, the exponential object may be defined through equations:
Existence of is guaranteed by existence of the operation .
Commutativity of the diagrams above is guaranteed by the equality .
Uniqueness of is guaranteed by the equality .
Universal property
The exponential is given by a universal morphism from the product functor to the object . This universal morphism consists of an object and a morphism .
A Heyting algebra is just a bounded lattice that has all exponential objects. Heyting implication, , is an alternative notation for . The above adjunction results translate to implication () being right adjoint to meet (). This adjunction can be written as , or more fully as:
In the category of topological spaces, the exponential object exists provided that is a locally compactHausdorff space. In that case, the space is the set of all continuous functions from to together with the compact-open topology. The evaluation map is the same as in the category of sets; it is continuous with the above topology.[5] If is not locally compact Hausdorff, the exponential object may not exist (the space still exists, but it may fail to be an exponential object since the evaluation function need not be continuous). For this reason the category of topological spaces fails to be cartesian closed.
However, the category of locally compact topological spaces is not cartesian closed either, since need not be locally compact for locally compact spaces and . A cartesian closed category of spaces is, for example, given by the full subcategory spanned by the compactly generated Hausdorff spaces.
^Goldblatt, Robert (1984). "Chapter 3: Arrows instead of epsilon". Topoi : the categorial analysis of logic. Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics #98 (Revised ed.). North-Holland. p. 72. ISBN978-0-444-86711-7.