Protists were historically regarded as a separate taxonomickingdom known as Protista or Protoctista. With the advent of phylogenetic analysis and electron microscopy studies, the use of Protista as a formal taxon was gradually abandoned. In modern classifications, protists are spread across several eukaryotic clades called supergroups, such as Archaeplastida (photoautotrophs that includes land plants), SAR, Obazoa (which includes fungi and animals), Amoebozoa and Excavata.
Protists represent an extremely large genetic and ecological diversity in all environments, including extreme habitats. Their diversity, larger than for all other eukaryotes, has only been discovered in recent decades through the study of environmental DNA and is still in the process of being fully described. They are present in all ecosystems as important components of the biogeochemical cycles and trophic webs. They exist abundantly and ubiquitously in a variety of forms that evolved multiple times independently, such as free-living algae, amoebae and slime moulds, or as important parasites. Together, they compose an amount of biomass that doubles that of animals. They exhibit varied types of nutrition (such as phototrophy, phagotrophy or osmotrophy), sometimes combining them (in mixotrophy). They present unique adaptations not present in multicellular animals, fungi or land plants. The study of protists is termed protistology.
The names of some protists (called ambiregnal protists), because of their mixture of traits similar to both animals and plants or fungi (e.g., slime molds and flagellated algae like euglenids), have been published under either or both of the botanical (ICN) and the zoological (ICZN) codes of nomenclature.[14][15]
Characteristics
Structure
Protists display a wide range of distinct morphologies that have been used to classify them for practical purposes, although most of these categories do not represent evolutionary cohesive lineages or clades and have instead evolved independently several times. The most recognizable types are:[16]
Amoebae. Characterized by their irregular, flexible shapes, these protists move by extending portions of their cytoplasm, known as pseudopodia, to crawl along surfaces.[17] Many groups of amoebae are naked, but testate amoebae and foraminifera grow a shell around their cell made from digested material or surrounding debris. Some, known as radiolarians and heliozoans, have special spherical shapes with microtubule-supported pseudopodia radiating from the cell.[16] Some amoebae are capable of producing stalked multicellular stages that bear spores, often by aggregating together; these are known as slime molds.[18] The main clades containing amoebae are Amoebozoa (including various slime molds and testate amoebae) and Rhizaria (including famous groups such as foraminifera and radiolarians, as well as a few testate amoebae).[19][20] Even some individual amoebae can grow to giant sizes visible to the naked eye.[21][22]
In general, protists are typical eukaryotic cells that follow the same principles of physiology and biochemistry described for those cells within the "higher" eukaryotes (animals, fungi or plants): they are aerobic organisms that consume oxygen to produce energy through mitochondria, and those with chloroplasts perform carbon fixation through photosynthesis in chloroplasts.[33] However, many have evolved a variety of unique physiological adaptations that do not appear in the remaining eukaryotes.[34]
Sensory adaptations. Many flagellates and probably all motile algae exhibit a positive phototaxis (i.e. they swim or glide toward a source of light). For this purpose, they exhibit three kinds of photoreceptors or "eyespots": (1) receptors with light antennae, found in many green algae, dinoflagellates and cryptophytes; (2) receptors with opaque screens; and (3) complex ocelloids with intracellular lenses, found in one group of predatory dinoflagellates, the Warnowiaceae. Additionally, some ciliates orient themselves in relation to the Earth's gravitational field while moving (geotaxis), and others swim in relation to the concentration of dissolved oxygen in the water.[34]
Endosymbiosis. Protists have an accentuated tendency to include endosymbionts in their cells, and these have produced new physiological opportunities. Some associations are more permanent, such as Paramecium bursaria and its endosymbiont Chlorella; others more transient. Many protists contain captured chloroplasts, chloroplast-mitochondrial complexes, and even eyespots from algae. The xenosomes are bacterial endosymbionts found in ciliates, sometimes with a methanogenic role inside anaerobic ciliates.[34]
Sexual reproduction
Protists generally reproduce asexually under favorable environmental conditions, but tend to reproduce sexually under stressful conditions, such as starvation or heat shock. Oxidative stress, which leads to DNA damage, also appears to be an important factor in the induction of sex in protists.[36]
Eukaryotes emerged in evolution more than 1.5 billion years ago.[37] The earliest eukaryotes were protists. Although sexual reproduction is widespread among multicellular eukaryotes, it seemed unlikely until recently, that sex could be a primordial and fundamental characteristic of eukaryotes. The main reason for this view was that sex appeared to be lacking in certain pathogenic protists whose ancestors branched off early from the eukaryotic family tree. However, several of these "early-branching" protists that were thought to predate the emergence of meiosis and sex (such as Giardia lamblia and Trichomonas vaginalis) are now known to descend from ancestors capable of meiosis and meiotic recombination, because they have a set core of meiotic genes that are present in sexual eukaryotes.[38][39] Most of these meiotic genes were likely present in the common ancestor of all eukaryotes,[40] which was likely capable of facultative (non-obligate) sexual reproduction.[41]
This view was further supported by a 2011 study on amoebae. Amoebae have been regarded as asexual organisms, but the study describes evidence that most amoeboid lineages are ancestrally sexual, and that the majority of asexual groups likely arose recently and independently.[42] Even in the early 20th century, some researchers interpreted phenomena related to chromidia (chromatin granules free in the cytoplasm) in amoebae as sexual reproduction.[43]
Sex in pathogenic protists
Some commonly found protist pathogens such as Toxoplasma gondii are capable of infecting and undergoing asexual reproduction in a wide variety of animals – which act as secondary or intermediate host – but can undergo sexual reproduction only in the primary or definitive host (for example: felids such as domestic cats in this case).[44][45][46]
Some species, for example Plasmodium falciparum, have extremely complex life cycles that involve multiple forms of the organism, some of which reproduce sexually and others asexually.[47] However, it is unclear how frequently sexual reproduction causes genetic exchange between different strains of Plasmodium in nature and most populations of parasitic protists may be clonal lines that rarely exchange genes with other members of their species.[48]
The pathogenic parasitic protists of the genus Leishmania have been shown to be capable of a sexual cycle in the invertebrate vector, likened to the meiosis undertaken in the trypanosomes.[49]
Diversity
The species diversity of protists is severely underestimated by traditional methods that differentiate species based on morphological characteristics. The number of described protist species is very low (ranging from 26,000[51] to over 76,000)[c] in comparison to the diversity of plants, animals and fungi, which are historically and biologically well-known and studied. The predicted number of species also varies greatly, ranging from 1.4×105 to 1.6×106, and in several groups the number of predicted species is arbitrarily doubled. Most of these predictions are highly subjective. Molecular techniques such as environmentalDNA barcoding have revealed a vast diversity of undescribed protists that accounts for the majority of eukaryotic sequences or operational taxonomic units (OTUs), dwarfing those from plants, animals and fungi.[50] As such, it is considered that protists dominate eukaryotic diversity.[13]
One possible topology for the eukaryotic tree of life.[53][2][54][55] Excavate groups are shown in green. 1Includes land plants. 2Includes animals and fungi.
The evolutionary relationships of protists have been explained through molecular phylogenetics, the sequencing of entire genomes and transcriptomes, and electron microscopy studies of the flagellar apparatus and cytoskeleton. New major lineages of protists and novel biodiversity continue to be discovered, resulting in dramatic changes to the eukaryotic tree of life. The newest classification systems of eukaryotes do not recognize the formal taxonomic ranks (kingdom, phylum, class, order...) and instead only recognize clades of related organisms, making the classification more stable in the long term and easier to update. In this new cladistic scheme, the protists are divided into various branches informally named supergroups. Most photosynthetic eukaryotes fall under the Diaphoretickes clade, which contains the supergroups Archaeplastida (which includes plants) and TSAR (including Telonemia, Stramenopiles, Alveolata and Rhizaria), as well as the phyla Cryptista and Haptista.[16] The animals and fungi fall into the Amorphea supergroup, which contains the phylum Amoebozoa and several other protist lineages. Various groups of eukaryotes with primitive cell architecture are collectively known as the Excavata.[1]
Excavata
Excavata is a group that encompasses diverse protists, mostly flagellates, ranging from aerobic and anaerobic predators to phototrophs and heterotrophs.[56]: 597 The common name 'excavate' refers to the common characteristic of a ventral groove in the cell used for suspension feeding, which is considered to be an ancestral trait present in the last eukaryotic common ancestor.[57] The Excavata is composed of three clades: Discoba, Metamonada and Malawimonadida, each including 'typical excavates' that are free-living phagotrophic flagellates with the characteristic ventral groove.[58] According to most phylogenetic analyses, this group is paraphyletic, with some analyses placing the root of the eukaryote tree within Metamonada.[59]
Discoba includes three major groups: Jakobida, Euglenozoa and Percolozoa.[d] Jakobida are a small group (~20 species) of free-living heterotrophic flagellates, with two cilia, that primarily eat bacteria through suspension feeding; most are aquatic aerobes, with some anaerobic species, found in marine, brackish or fresh water.[61] They are best known for their bacterial-like mitochondrial genomes.[16] Euglenozoa is a rich (>2,000 species)[62] group of flagellates with very different lifestyles, including: the free-living heterotrophic (both osmo- and phagotrophic)[56] and photosynthetic euglenids (e.g., the euglenophytes, with chloroplasts originated from green algae); the free-living and parasitic kinetoplastids (such as the trypanosomes); the deep-sea anaerobic symbiontids; and the elusive diplonemids.[63] Percolozoa[d] (~150 species) are a collection of amoebae, flagellates and amoeboflagellates with complex life cycles, among which are some slime molds (acrasids).[16][60] The two clades Euglenozoa and Percolozoa are sister taxa, united under the name Discicristata, in reference to their mitochondrial cristae shaped like discs.[9] The species Tsukubamonas globosa is a free-living flagellate whose precise position within Discoba is not yet settled, but is probably more closely related to Discicristata than to Jakobida.[61]
The metamonads (Metamonada) are a phylum of completely anaerobic or microaerophilic protozoa, primarily flagellates. Some are gut symbionts of animals such as termites, others are free-living, and others are parasitic. They include three main clades: Fornicata, Parabasalia and Preaxostyla.[16] Fornicata (>140 species)[52] encompasses the diplomonads, with two nuclei (e.g., Giardia, genus of well-known parasites of humans), and several smaller groups of free-living, commensal and parasitic protists (e.g., Carpediemonas, retortamonads).[16] Parabasalia (>460 species)[52] is a varied group of anaerobic, mostly endobiotic organisms, ranging from small parasites (like Trichomonas vaginalis, another human pathogen) to giant intestinal symbionts with numerous flagella and nuclei found in wood-eating termites and cockroaches.[16] Preaxostyla (~140 species) includes the anaerobic and endobiotic oxymonads, with modified mitochondria, and two genera of free-living microaerophilic bacterivorous flagellates Trimastix and Paratrimastix, with typical excavate morphology.[64] Two genera of anaerobic flagellates of recent description and unique cell architecture, Barthelona and Skoliomonas, are closely related to the Fornicata.[65]
The malawimonads (Malawimonadida) are a small group (three species) of freshwater or marine suspension-feeding bacterivorous flagellates[66] with typical excavate appearance, closely resembling Jakobida and some metamonads but not phylogenetically close to either in most analyses.[16]
Diaphoretickes includes nearly all photosynthetic eukaryotes. Within this clade, the TSAR supergroup gathers a colossal diversity of protists. The most basal branching member of the TSAR clade is Telonemia, a small (seven species) phylum of obscure phagotrophic predatory flagellates, found in marine and freshwater environments. They share some cellular similarities with the remaining three clades: Rhizaria, Alveolata and stramenopiles, collectively known as the SAR supergroup.[67] Another highly diverse clade within Diaphoretickes is Archaeplastida, which houses land plants and a variety of algae. In addition, two smaller groups, Haptista and Cryptista, also belong to Diaphoretickes.[1]
Stramenopiles
The stramenopiles, also known as Heterokonta, are characterized by the presence of two cilia, one of which bears many short, straw-like hairs (mastigonemes). They include one clade of phototrophs and numerous clades of heterotrophs, present in virtually all habitats. Stramenopiles include two usually well-supported clades, Bigyra and Gyrista, although the monophyly of Bigyra is being questioned.[68] Branching outside both Bigyra and Gyrista is a single species of enigmatic heterotrophic flagellates, Platysulcus tardus.[68] Much of the diversity of heterotrophic stramenopiles is still uncharacterized, known almost entirely from lineages of genetic sequences known as MASTs (MArine STramenopiles),[68] of which only a few species have been described.[69][70]
The phylum Gyrista includes the photosynthetic Ochrophyta or Heterokontophyta (>23,000 species),[62] which contain chloroplasts originated from a red alga. Among these are many lineages of algae that encompass a wide range of structures and morphologies. The three most diverse ochrophyte classes are: the diatoms, unicellular or colonial organisms encased in silica cell walls (frustules) that exhibit widely different shapes and ornamentations, responsible for a big portion of the oxygen produced worldwide, and comprising much of the marine phytoplankton;[16][71] the brown algae, filamentous or 'truly' multicellular (with differentiated tissues) macroalgae that constitute the basis of many temperate and cold marine ecosystems, such as kelp forests;[72] and the golden algae, unicellular or colonial flagellates that are mostly present in freshwater habitats.[73] Inside Gyrista, the sister clade to Ochrophyta are the predominantly osmotrophic and filamentous pseudofungi (>1,200 species),[74] which include three distinct lineages: the parasitic oomycetes or water moulds (e.g., Phytophthora infestans, the agent behind the Irish Potato Famine), which encompass most of the pseudofungi species; the less diverse non-parasitic hyphochytrids that maintain a fungus-like lifestyle; and the bigyromonads, a group of bacterivorous or eukaryovorous phagotrophs.[68] A small group of heliozoan-like heterotrophic amoebae, Actinophryida, has an uncertain position, either within or as the sister taxon of Ochrophyta.[75]
The little studied phylum Bigyra is an assemblage of exclusively heterotrophic organisms, most of which are free-living. It includes the labyrinthulomycetes, among which are single-celled amoeboid phagotrophs, mixotrophs, and fungus-like filamentous heterotrophs that create slime networks to move and absorb nutrients, as well as some parasites and a few testate amoebae (Amphitremida). Also included in Bigyra are the bicosoecids, phagotrophic flagellates that consume bacteria, and the closely related Placidozoa, which consists of several groups of heterotrophic flagellates (e.g., the deep-sea halophilic Placididea) as well as the intestinal commensals known as Opalinata (e.g., the human parasite Blastocystis, and the highly unusual opalinids, composed of giant cells with numerous nuclei and cilia, originally misclassified as ciliates).[68]
The alveolates (Alveolata) are characterized by the presence of cortical alveoli, cytoplasmic sacs underlying the cell membrane of unknown physiological function.[56]: 599 Among them are three of the most well-known groups of protists: apicomplexans, dinoflagellates and ciliates. The ciliates (Ciliophora) are a highly diverse (>8,000 species) and probably the most thoroughly studied[16] group of protists. They are mostly free-living microbes characterized by large cells covered in rows of cilia and containing two kinds of nuclei, micronucleus and macronucleus (e.g., Paramecium, a model organism).[76] Free-living ciliates are usually the top heterotrophs and predators in microbial food webs, feeding on bacteria and smaller eukaryotes, present in a variety of ecosystems, although a few species are kleptoplastic. Others are parasitic of numerous animals.[77] Ciliates have a basal position in the evolution of alveolates, together with a few species of heterotrophic flagellates with two cilia collectively known as colponemids.[78]
The remaining alveolates are grouped under the clade Myzozoa, whose common ancestor acquired chloroplasts through a secondary endosymbiosis from a red alga.[79] One branch of Myzozoa contains the apicomplexans and their closest relatives, a small clade of flagellates known as Chrompodellida where phototrophic and heterotrophic flagellates, called chromerids and colpodellids respectively, are evolutionarily intermingled.[79] In contrast, the apicomplexans (Apicomplexa) are a large (>6,000 species) and highly specialized group of obligate parasites who have all secondarily lost their photosynthetic ability (e.g., Plasmodium falciparum, cause of malaria). Their adult stages absorb nutrients from the host through the cell membrane, and they reproduce between hosts via sporozoites, which exhibit an organelle complex (the apicoplast) evolved from non-photosynthetic chloroplasts.[80][56]: 600
The other branch of Myzozoa contains the dinoflagellates and their closest relatives, the perkinsids (Perkinsozoa), a small group (26 species) of aquatic intracellular parasites which have lost their photosynthetic ability similarly to apicomplexans.[79] They reproduce through flagellated spores that infect dinoflagellates, molluscs and fish.[81] In contrast, the dinoflagellates (Dinoflagellata) are a highly diversified (~4,500 species)[82] group of aquatic algae that have mostly retained their chloroplasts, although many lineages have lost their own and instead either live as heterotrophs or reacquire new chloroplasts from other sources, including tertiary endosymbiosis and kleptoplasty.[83] Most dinoflagellates are free-living and compose an important portion of phytoplankton, as well as a major cause of harmful algal blooms due to their toxicity; some live as symbionts of corals, allowing the creation of coral reefs. Dinoflagellates exhibit a diversity of cellular structures, such as complex eyelike ocelli, specialized vacuoles, bioluminescent organelles, and a wall surrounding the cell known as the theca.[82]
Rhizaria is a lineage of morphologically diverse organisms, composed almost entirely of unicellular heterotrophic amoebae, flagellates and amoeboflagellates,[16] commonly with reticulose (net-like) or filose (thread-like) pseudopodia for feeding and locomotion.[84][56]: 604 It was the last supergroup to be described, because it lacks any defining characteristic and was discovered exclusively through molecular phylogenetics.[85] Three major clades are included, namely the phyla Cercozoa, Endomyxa and Retaria.[1]
Retaria contains the most familiar rhizarians: forams and radiolarians, two groups of large free-living marine amoebae with pseudopodia supported by microtubules, many of which are macroscopic.[16] The radiolarians (Radiolaria) are a diverse group (>1,000 living species) of amoebae, often bearing delicate and intricate siliceous skeletons.[86] The forams (Foraminifera) are also diverse (>6,700 living species),[87] and most of them are encased in multichambered tests constructed from calcium carbonate or agglutinated mineral particles.[16] Both groups have a rich fossil record, with tens of thousands of described fossil species.[87][88]
Cercozoa (also known as Filosa) is an assemblage of free-living protists with very different morphologies. Cercozoan amoeboflagellates are important predators of other microbes in terrestrial habitats and the plant microbiota (e.g., cercomonads and paracercomonads and glissomonads, collectively known as class Sarcomonadea),[89] and a few can generate slime molds (e.g., Helkesea).[90] Many cercozoans are testate or scale-bearing amoebae, namely the elusive Kraken and the two classes Imbricatea (e.g., the euglyphids) and Thecofilosea.[89] Thecofilosea also contains the Phaeodaria (~400–500 species), a group of skeleton-bearing marine amoebae previously classified as radiolarians,[88] and both classes include some non-scaly naked flagellates (e.g., spongomonads in Imbricatea and thaumatomonads in Thecofilosea).[91] Among the basal-branching cercozoans are the pseudopodia-lacking thecate flagellates of Metromonadea, the heliozoan-like Granofilosea[91] and the photosynthetic chlorarachniophytes, whose chloroplasts originated from a secondary endosymbiosis with a green alga.[16]
Endomyxa contains two major clades of parasitic protists: Ascetosporea are sporozoan-type parasites of marine invertebrates,[92] while Phytomyxea are obligate pathogens of plants and algae, divided into the terrestrial plasmodiophorids and the marine phagomyxids.[93] Also included in Endomyxa are the order of predatory amoebae Vampyrellida (48 species)[94] and two genera of marine amoebae, the thecate Gromia and the naked Filoreta.[1]
Besides these three phyla, Rhizaria includes numerous enigmatic and understudied lineages of uncertain evolutionary position. One such clade is the Gymnosphaerida, which includes heliozoan-type protists.[95] Several clades labeled as Novel Clades (NC) are entirely composed of environmental DNA from uncultured protists, although a few have slowly been resolved over the decades with the description of new taxa (e.g., Tremulida and Aquavolonida, formerly NC11 and NC10 respectively, with a deep-branching position in Rhizaria).[96]
Haptista and Cryptista are two similar phyla of single-celled protists previously thought to be closely related, and collectively known as Hacrobia.[97] However, the monophyly of Hacrobia was disproven, as the two groups originated independently.[98] Molecular analyses place Cryptista next to Archaeplastida, forming the hypothesized "CAM" clade, and Haptista next to the TSAR clade.[54][55]
The phylum Haptista includes two distinct clades with mineralized scales: haptophytes and centrohelids.[16] The haptophytes (Haptophyta) are a group of over 500 living species[62] of flagellated or coccoid algae that have acquired chloroplasts from a secondary endosymbiosis. They are mostly marine, comprise an important portion of oceanic plankton, and include the coccolithophores, whose calcified scales ('coccoliths') contribute to the formation of sedimentary rocks and the biogeochemical cycles of carbon and calcium. Some species are capable of forming toxic blooms.[99] The centrohelids (Centroplasthelida) are a small (~95 species)[100] but widespread group of heterotrophic heliozoan-type amoebae, usually covered in scale-bearng mucous, that form an important component of benthic food webs of aquatic habitats, both marine and freshwater.[101]
The phylum Cryptista is a clade of three distinct groups of unicellular protists: cryptomonads, katablepharids, and the species Palpitomonas bilix.[1] The cryptomonads (>100 species), also known as cryptophytes, are flagellated algae found in aquatic habitats of diverse salinity, characterized by extrusive organelles or extrusomes called ejectisomes. Their chloroplasts, of red algal origin, contain a nucleomorph, a remnant of the eukaryotic nucleus belonging to the endosymbiotic red alga.[102] The katablepharids, the closest relatives of cryptomonads, are heterotrophic flagellates with two cilia, also characterized by ejectisomes.[97][1] The species Palpitomonas bilix is the most basal-branching member of Cryptista, a marine heterotrophic flagellate with two cilia, but unlike the remaining members it lacks ejectisomes.[103]
Archaeplastida is the clade containing those photosynthetic groups whose plastids were likely obtained through a single event of primary endosymbiosis with a cyanobacterium. It contains land plants (Embryophyta) and a big portion of the diversity of algae, most of which are the green algae, from which plants evolved, and the red algae.[104] A third lineage of algae, the glaucophytes (25 species),[62] contains rare and obscure species found in surfaces of freshwater and terrestrial habitats.[104]
The red algae or Rhodophyta (>7,100 species) are a group of diverse morphologies, ranging from single cells to multicellular filaments to giant pseudoparenchymatousthalli, all without flagella. They lack chlorophyll and only harvest light energy through phycobiliproteins. Their life cycles are varied and may include two or three generations. They are present in terrestrial, freshwater and primarily marine habitats, from the intertidal zone to deep waters; some are calcified and are vital components of marine ecosystems such as coral reefs.[105] Closely related to the red algae are two small lineages of non-photosynthetic predatory flagellates: the freshwater and marine Rhodelphidia (3 species),[106] which still retain genetic evidence of relic plastids;[107] and the marine Picozoa (1 species), which lack any remains of plastids. The evolutionary position of Picozoa may indicate that there have been two separate events of primary endosymbiosis, as opposed to one.[108]
The green algae, unlike the monophyletic glaucophytes and rhodophytes, are a paraphyletic group from which land plants evolved. Together they compose the Chloroplastida or Viridiplantae clade.[1] The earliest branching member is the phylum Prasinodermophyta (ten species), whose members are exclusively marine coccoid cells or small macroscopic thalli.[109] The remaining green algae are distributed in two major clades. One clade is the phylum Chlorophyta (>7,900 species),[62] which includes numerous lineages of scaly unicellular flagellate algae known collectively as prasinophytes along with the Prasinodermophyta, but also includes a variety of morphologies such as coccoids, palmelloids, colonies, and macroscopic filamentous, foliose or tubular thalli, present in aquatic and terrestrial habitats.[1] The opposed clade is Streptophyta, which contains the land plants and a paraphyletic group of green algae collectively known as phylum Charophyta, composed of several classes: Zygnematophyceae (>4,300 species),[62] containing unicellular, colonial and filamentous flagella-lacking organisms found almost exclusively in freshwater habitats;[110]Charophyceae (450 living species),[62] also known as stoneworts, consisting of complex multicellular thalli only found in freshwater habitats;[111]Klebsormidiophyceae (52 species), with unbranched filamentous thalli; Coleochaetophyceae (36 species), containing branched filamentous thalli; Mesostigmatophyceae, composed of a single species of scaly flagellates; and Chlorokybophyceae (five species), with sarcinoid forms.[112][62]
Amorphea is a group of exclusively heterotrophic organisms. It contains the fungi and animals, as well as most slime moulds, many amoebae and some flagellates.[113] Many of its protist members exhibit complex life cycles with different levels of multicellularity.[114] Amorphea is roughly equivalent to the concept of 'unikonts', meaning 'single cilium', although it currently contains several organisms with more cilia.[115] It is defined as the smallest clade containing the groups Amoebozoa (containing mostly slime moulds and amoebae) and Opisthokonta (containing fungi, animals, and their closest relatives).[113][1] The closest relatives of Opisthokonta are two small lineages of single-celled protists with two cilia: the flagellate Apusomonadida (28 species)[116] and the amoeboflagellate anaerobic Breviatea (four species).[16] Together with opisthokonts, these two groups form the clade Obazoa, the sister clade to Amoebozoa.[115]
Amoebozoa
The phylum Amoebozoa (2,400 species)[50] is a large group of morphologically diverse phagotrophic protists, mostly amoebae. A considerable portion of amoebozoans are lobose amoebae, meaning they produce round, blunt-ended pseudopods.[117] It includes the 'archetypal' amoebae, known as the naked lobose amoebae or 'gymnamoebae'[118] (such as Amoeba itself),[119] among which is a genus of sorocarp-forming slime moulds, Copromyxa.[120] Some gymnamoebae are important pathogens to animals (e.g., Acanthamoeba).[121] Other relevant lobose amoebae are the Arcellinida, a diverse order of testate amoebae and one of the most conspicuous protist grups overall.[122] The remaining, non-lobose amoebozoans include the Eumycetozoa or 'true slime moulds', comprising the sorocarp-producing bacterivorous dictyostelids and the sporocarp-producing omnivorous myxogastrids and protosporangiids.[1] Due to the fungus-like appearance of their fruiting bodies, eumycetozoans are often studied by mycologists.[16] Closely related to the eumycetozoans are two lineages: the Variosea, a heterogeneous assortment of amoeboid, reticulate or flagellated organisms[119] (including some sorocarp-producing organisms);[123] and the anaerobic Archamoebae, some of which live as intestinal symbionts of some animals (e.g., Entamoeba).[1]
Opisthokonta includes the animal and fungal kingdoms,[a] as well as their closest protist relatives. The branch leading to the fungi is known as Nucletmycea or Holomycota, while the branch leading to the animals is called Holozoa.[124] The Holomycota includes the closest relatives of fungi, the nucleariids, a small group (~50 species) of free-living naked or scale-bearing phagotrophic amoebae with filose pseudopodia, some of which can aggregate into slime moulds.[125] Within the wider definition of fungi, three groups are studied as protists by some authors: Aphelida (15 species),[12]Rozellida (27 species)[126] and Microsporidia (~1,300 species),[127] collectively known as Opisthosporidia, as opposed to the 'true' or osmotrophic fungi. Both aphelids and rozellids are single-celled phagotrophic flagellates that feed in an endobiotic manner, penetrating the cells of their respective hosts. Microsporidians are obligate intracellular parasites that feed through osmotrophy, much like true fungi. Aphelids and true fungi are closest relatives, and generally feed on cellulose-walled organisms (many algae and plants). Conversely, rozellids and microsporidians form a separate clade, and generally feed on chitin-walled organisms (fungi and animals).[128]
The Holozoa includes various lineages with complex life cycles involving different cell types and associated with the origin of animal multicellularity.[16] The closest relatives to animals are the choanoflagellates (~360 species), free-living flagellates that feed through a collar of microvilli surrounding a larger cilium and often form colonies.[129] The Ichthyosporea (>40 species), otherwise known as mesomycetozoans, are a group of fungus-like pathogenic holozoans specialized in infecting fish and other animals.[130] The Filasterea (six species) are a heterogeneous group of free-living, endosymbiotic, or parasitic amoebae or flagellates.[131] Lastly, the Pluriformea are two species of free-living holozoans with life cycles that include multicellular aggregates.[132] An elusive flagellate species Tunicaraptor unikontum has an uncertain evolutionary position among these holozoan groups.[133]
Many smaller lineages do not belong to any of these supergroups, and are usually poorly known groups with limited data, often referred to as 'orphan groups'. Some, such as the CRuMs clade, Malawimonadida and Ancyromonadida, appear to be related to Amorphea.[16] Others, like Hemimastigophora (ten species)[134] and Provora (seven species), appear to be related to or within Diaphoretickes, a clade that unites SAR, Archaeplastida, Haptista and Cryptista.[2] A mysterious protist species, Meteora sporadica, is more closely related to the latter two of these orphan groups.[55]
Ecology
Protists are indispensable to modern ecosystems worldwide. They also have been the only eukaryotic component of all ecosystems for much of Earth's history, which allowed them to evolve a vast functional diversity that explains their critical ecological significance. They are essential as primary producers, as intermediates in multiple trophic levels, as key regulating parasites or parasitoids, and as partners in diverse symbioses.[13]
Habitat diversity
Protists are abundant and diverse in nearly all habitats. They contribute 4 gigatons (Gt) to Earth's biomass—double that of animals (2 Gt), but less than 1% of the total. Combined, protists, animals, archaea (7 Gt), and fungi (12 Gt) make up less than 10% of global biomass, with plants (450 Gt) and bacteria (70 Gt) dominating.[135] Protist diversity, as detected through environmental DNA surveys, is vast in every sampled environment, but it is mostly undescribed.[136] The richest protist communities appear in soils, followed by oceanic and lastly freshwater habitats, mostly as part of the plankton.[137] Freshwater protist communities are characterized by a higher "beta diversity" (i.e. highly heterogeneous between samples) than soil and marine plankton. The high diversity can be a result of the hydrological dynamic of recruiting organisms from different habitats through extreme floods.[138]Soil-dwelling protist communities are ecologically the richest, possibly be due to the complex and highly dynamic distribution of water in the sediment, which creates extremely heterogenous environmental conditions. The constantly changing environment promotes the activity of only one part of the community at a time, while the rest remains inactive; this phenomenon promotes high microbial diversity in prokaryotes as well as protists.[137]
Primary producers
Microscopic phototrophic protists (or microalgae) are the main contributors to the biomass and primary production in nearly all aquatic environments, where they are collectively known as phytoplankton (together with cyanobacteria). In marine phytoplankton, the smallest fractions, the picoplankton (<2 μm) and nanoplankton (2–20 μm), are dominated by several different algae (prymnesiophytes, pelagophytes, prasinophytes); fractions larger than 5 μm are instead dominated by diatoms and dinoflagellates.[136] In freshwater phytoplankton, golden algae, cryptophytes and dinoflagellates are the most abundant groups.[137] Altogether, they are responsible for almost half of the global primary production.[139] They are the main providers of much of the energy and organic matter used by bacteria, archaea, and higher trophic levels (zooplankton and fish), including essential nutrients such as fatty acids.[140] Their abundance in the oceans depends mostly on the availability of inorganic nutrients, rather than temperature or sunlight; they are most abundant in coastal waters that receive nutrient-rich run-off from land, and areas where nutrient-rich deep ocean water reaches the surface, namely the upwelling zones in the arctic oceans and along continental margins.[139] In freshwater habitats, most phototrophic protists are mixotrophic, meaning they also behave as consumers, while strict consumers (heterotrophs) are less abundant.[137]
Macroalgae (namely red algae, green algae and brown algae), unlike phytoplankton, generally require a fixation point, which limits their marine distribution to coastal waters, and particularly to rocky substrates. They support numerous herbivorous animals, especially benthic ones, as both food and refuge from predators. Some communities of seaweeds exist adrift on the ocean surface, serving as a refuge and means of dispersal for associated organisms.[141][142]
Phagotrophic protists are the most diverse functional group in all ecosystems, primarily represented by cercozoans (dominant in freshwater and soils), radiolarians (dominant in oceans), non-photosynthetic stramenopiles (with higher abundance in soils than in oceans), and ciliates.[137]
Contrary to the common division between phytoplankton and zooplankton, much of the marine plankton is composed of mixotrophic protists, which pose a largely underestimated importance and abundance (around 12% of all marine environmental DNA sequences). Mixotrophs have varied presence due to seasonal abundance[144] and depending on their specific type of mixotrophy. Constitutive mixotrophs are present in almost the entire range of oceanic conditions, from eutrophic shallow habitats to oligotrophic subtropical waters but mostly dominating the photic zone, and they account for most of the predation of bacteria. They are also responsible for harmful algal blooms. Plastidic and generalist non-constitutive mixotrophs have similar biogeographies and low abundance, mostly found in eutrophic coastal waters, with generalist ciliates dominating up to half of ciliate communities in the photic zone. Lastly, endosymbiotic mixotrophs are by far the most widespread and abundant non-constitutive type, representing over 90% of all mixotroph sequences (mostly radiolarians).[145][146]
In the trophic webs of soils, protists are the main consumers of both bacteria and fungi, the two main pathways of nutrient flow towards higher trophic levels.[147] Amoeboflagellates like the glissomonads and cercomonads are among the most abundant soil protists: they possess both flagella and pseudopodia, a morphological variability well suited for foraging between soil particles. Testate amoebae are also acclimated to the soil environment, as their shells protect against desiccation.[143] As bacterial grazers, they have a significant role in the foodweb: they excrete nitrogen in the form of NH3, making it available to plants and other microbes.[147] Traditionally, protists were considered primarily bacterivorous due to biases in cultivation techniques, but many (e.g., vampyrellids, cercomonads, gymnamoebae, testate amoebae, small flagellates) are omnivores that feed on a wide range of soil eukaryotes, including fungi and even some animals such as nematodes. Bacterivorous and mycophagous protists amount to similar biomasses.[148]
Decomposers
Necrophagy (the degradation of dead biomass) among microbes is mainly attributed to bacteria and fungi, but protists have a still poorly recognized role as decomposers with specialized lyticenzymes.[149] In soils, fungus-like protists and slime molds (e.g., oomycetes, myxomycetes, acrasids) are present abundantly as osmotrophs and saprotrophs.[143] In marine and estuarine environments, the well-studied thraustochytrids (part of labyrinthulomycetes) are relevant saprotrophs that decompose various substrates, including dead plant and animal tissue. Various ciliates and testate amoebae scavenge on dead animals. Some nucleariid amoebae specifically consume the contents of dead or damaged cells, but not healthy cells. However, all these examples are only facultative necrophages that also feed on live prey. In contrast, the algivorous cercozoan family Viridiraptoridae, present in shallow bog waters, are broad-range but sophisticated necrophages that feed on a variety of exclusively dead algae, potentially fulfilling an important role in cleaning up the environment and releasing nutrients for live microbes.[149]
Parasites and pathogens
Parasitic protists occupy around 15–20% of all environmental DNA in marine and soil systems, but only around 5% in freshwater systems, where chytrid fungi likely fill that ecological niche. In oceanic systems, parasitoids (i.e. those which kill their hosts, e.g. Syndiniales) are more abundant. In freshwater ecosystems, parasitoids are mainly Perkinsea and Syndiniales (Alveolata), while true parasites in freshwater are mostly oomycetes, Apicomplexa and Ichthyosporea.[137]
In soil ecosystems, true parasites (i.e. those which do not kill their hosts) are primarily animal-hosted apicomplexans and plant-hosted oomycetes and plasmodiophorids.[143] In Neotropical forest soils, apicomplexans dominate eukaryotic diversity and have an important role as parasites of small invertebrates, while oomycetes are very scarce in contrast.[150]
Around 100 protist species can infect humans.[143] Two papers from 2013 have proposed virotherapy, the use of viruses to treat infections caused by protozoa.[156][157]
In the early 19th century, German naturalist Georg August Goldfuss introduced Protozoa (meaning 'early animals') as a class within Kingdom Animalia,[161] to refer to four very different groups: Infusoria (ciliates), corals, phytozoa (such as Cryptomonas) and jellyfish. Later, in 1845, Carl Theodor von Siebold was the first to establish Protozoa as a phylum of exclusively unicellular animals consisting of two classes: Infusoria (ciliates) and Rhizopoda (amoebae, foraminifera).[162] Other scientists did not consider all of them part of the animal kingdom, and by the middle of the century they were regarded within the groupings of Protozoa (early animals), Protophyta (early plants), Phytozoa (animal-like plants) and Bacteria (mostly considered plants). Microscopic organisms were increasingly constrained in the plant/animal dichotomy. In 1858, the palaeontolgist Richard Owen was the first to define Protozoa as a separate kingdom of eukaryotic organisms, with "nucleated cells" and the "common organic characters" of plants and animals, although he also included sponges within protozoa.[27]
In 1860, British naturalistJohn Hogg proposed Protoctista (meaning 'first-created beings') as the name for a fourth kingdom of nature (the other kingdoms being Linnaeus' plant, animal and mineral) which comprised all the lower, primitive organisms, including protophyta, protozoa and sponges, at the merging bases of the plant and animal kingdoms.[163][27]
In 1866, the 'father of protistology', German scientist Ernst Haeckel, addressed the problem of classifying all these organisms as a mixture of animal and vegetable characters, and proposed Protistenreich[164] (Kingdom Protista) as the third kingdom of life, comprising primitive forms that were "neither animals nor plants". He grouped both bacteria[165] and eukaryotes, both unicellular and multicellular organisms, as Protista. He retained the Infusoria in the animal kingdom, until German zoologist Otto Bütschli demonstrated that they were unicellular.[166][167] At first, he included sponges and fungi, but in later publications he explicitly restricted Protista to predominantly unicellular organisms or colonies incapable of forming tissues. He clearly separated Protista from true animals on the basis that the defining character of protists was the absence of sexual reproduction, while the defining character of animals was the blastula stage of animal development. He also returned the terms Protozoa and Protophyta as subkingdoms of Protista.[27]
End of the animal-plant dichotomy
Bütschli considered the kingdom to be too polyphyletic and rejected the inclusion of bacteria. He fragmented the kingdom into protozoa (only nucleated, unicellular animal-like organisms), while bacteria and the protophyta were a separate grouping. This strengthened the old dichotomy of protozoa/protophyta from German scientist Carl Theodor von Siebold, and the German naturalists asserted this view over the worldwide scientific community by the turn of the century. However, British biologist C. Clifford Dobell in 1911 brought attention to the fact that protists functioned very differently compared to the animal and vegetable cellular organization, and gave importance to Protista as a group with a different organization that he called "acellularity", shifting away from the dogma of German cell theory. He coined the term protistology and solidified it as a branch of study independent from zoology and botany.[27]
In 1938, American biologist Herbert Copeland resurrected Hogg's label, arguing that Haeckel's term Protista included anucleated microbes such as bacteria, which the term Protoctista (meaning "first established beings") did not. Under his four-kingdom classification (Monera, Protoctista, Plantae, Animalia), the protists and bacteria were finally split apart, recognizing the difference between anucleate (prokaryotic) and nucleate (eukaryotic) organisms. To firmly separate protists from plants, he followed Haeckel's blastular definition of true animals, and proposed defining true plants as those with chlorophyll a and b, carotene, xanthophyll and production of starch. He also was the first to recognize that the unicellular/multicellular dichotomy was invalid. Still, he kept fungi within Protoctista, together with red algae, brown algae and protozoans.[27][168] This classification was the basis for Whittaker's later definition of Fungi, Animalia, Plantae and Protista as the four kingdoms of life.[169]
In the popular five-kingdom scheme published by American plant ecologist Robert Whittaker in 1969, Protista was defined as eukaryotic "organisms which are unicellular or unicellular-colonial and which form no tissues". Just as the prokaryotic/eukaryotic division was becoming mainstream, Whittaker, after a decade from Copeland's system,[169] recognized the fundamental division of life between the prokaryotic Monera and the eukaryotic kingdoms: Animalia (ingestion), Plantae (photosynthesis), Fungi (absorption) and the remaining Protista.[170][171][27]
In the five-kingdom system of American evolutionary biologist Lynn Margulis, the term "protist" was reserved for microscopic organisms, while the more inclusive kingdom Protoctista (or protoctists) included certain large multicellular eukaryotes, such as kelp, red algae, and slime molds.[172] Some use the term protist interchangeably with Margulis' protoctist, to encompass both single-celled and multicellular eukaryotes, including those that form specialized tissues but do not fit into any of the other traditional kingdoms.[173]
Advances in electron microscopy and molecular phylogenetics
The five-kingdom model remained the accepted classification until the development of molecular phylogenetics in the late 20th century, when it became apparent that protists are a paraphyletic group from which animals, fungi and plants evolved, and the three-domain system (Bacteria, Archaea, Eukarya) became prevalent.[174] Today, protists are not treated as a formal taxon, but the term is commonly used for convenience in two ways:[5]
Functional definition: protists are essentially those eukaryotes that are never multicellular,[5] that either exist as independent cells, or if they occur in colonies, do not show differentiation into tissues.[178] While in popular usage, this definition excludes the variety of non-colonial multicellularity types that protists exhibit, such as aggregative (e.g., choanoflagellates) or complex multicellularity (e.g., brown algae).[179]
By definition, all eukaryotes before the existence of plants, animals and fungi are considered protists. For that reason, this section contains information about the deep ancestry of all eukaryotes.
All living eukaryotes, including protists, evolved from the last eukaryotic common ancestor (LECA). Descendants of this ancestor are known as "crown-group" or "modern" eukaryotes. Molecular clocks suggest that LECA originated between 1,200 and more than 1,800 million years ago (Ma). Based on all molecular predictions, modern eukaryotes reached morphological and ecological diversity before 1000 Ma in the form of multicellularalgae capable of sexual reproduction, and unicellular protists capable of phagocytosis and locomotion. However, the fossil record of modern eukaryotes is very scarce around this period, which contradicts the predicted diversity.[181]
Instead, the fossil record of this period contains "stem-group eukaryotes". These fossils cannot be assigned to any known crown group, so they probably belong to extinct lineages that originated before LECA. They appear continuously throughout the Mesoproterozoic fossil record (1650–1000 Ma). They present defining eukaryote characteristics such as complex cell wall ornamentation and cell membrane protrusions, which require a flexible endomembrane system. However, they had a major distinction from crown eukaryores: the composition of their cell membrane. Unlike crown eukaryotes, which produce "crown sterols" for their cell membranes (e.g. cholesterol and ergosterol), stem eukaryotes produced "protosterols", which appear earlier in the biosynthetic pathway.[181]
Crown sterols, while metabolically more expensive, may have granted several evolutionary advantages for LECA's descendants. Specific unsaturation patterns in crown sterols protect against osmotic shock during desiccation and rehydration cycles. Crown sterols can also receive ethyl groups, thus enhancing cohesion between lipids and adapting cells against extreme cold and heat. Moreover, the additional steps in the biosynthetic pathway allow cells to regulate the proportion of different sterols in their membranes, in turn allowing for a wider habitable temperature range and unique mechanisms such as asymmetric cell division or membrane repair under exposure to UV light. A more speculative role of these sterols is their protection against the Proterozoic changing oxygen levels. It is theorized that all of these sterol-based mechanisms allowed LECA's descendants to live as extremophiles of their time, diversifying into ecological niches that experienced cycles of desiccation and rehydration, daily extremes of high and low temperatures, and elevated UV radiation (such as mudflats, rivers, agitated shorelines and subaerial soil).[181]
In contrast, the named mechanisms were absent in stem-group eukaryotes, as they were only capable of producing protosterols. Instead, these protosterol-based life forms occupied open marine waters. They were facultative anaerobes that thrived in Mesoproterozoic waters, which at the time were low on oxygen. Eventually, during the Tonian period (Neoproterozoic era), oxygen levels increased and the crown eukaryotes were able to expand to open marine environments thanks to their preference for more oxygenated habitats. Stem eukaryotes may have been driven to extinction as a result of this competition. Additionally, their protosterol membranes may have posed a disadvantage during the cold of the Cryogenian "Snowball Earth" glaciations and the extreme global heat that came afterwards.[181]
Neoproterozoic
Modern eukaryotes began to appear abundantly in the Tonian period (1000–720 Ma), fueled by the proliferation of red algae. The oldest fossils assigned to modern eukaryotes belong to two photosynthetic protists: the multicellular red algaBangiomorpha (from 1050 Ma), and the chlorophytegreen algaProterocladus (from 1000 Ma).[181] Abundant fossils of heterotrophic protists appear later, around 900 Ma, with the emergence of fungi.[181] For example, the oldest fossils of Amoebozoa are vase-shaped microfossils resembling modern testate amoebae, found in 800 million-year-old rocks.[182][183]Radiolarian shells are found abundantly in the fossil record after the Cambrian period (~500 Ma), but more recent paleontological studies are beginning to interpret some Precambrian fossils as the earliest evidence of radiolarians.[184][185][186]
^ abThe distinction between protists and the other three eukaryotic kingdoms has been difficult to settle. Historically, the heterotrophic protists, known as protozoa, were considered part of the animal kingdom, while the phototrophic ones, called algae, were studied as part of the plant kingdom. Even after the creation of a separate protist kingdom, some minuscule animals (the myxozoans)[6] and 'lower' fungi (namely the aphelids, rozellids and microsporidians, collectively known as Opisthosporidia) were studied as protists,[7][8][9] and some algae (particularly red and green algae) remained classified as plants.[10] According to the current consensus, the label 'protist' specifically excludes animals, embryophytes (land plants) —meaning that all algae fall under this label— and all fungi. Opisthosporidians are considered part of a larger fungal kingdom, although they are often studied by protistologists and mycologists alike.[1][11][12]
^The terms 'cilium' and 'eukaryotic flagellum' are interchangeable from a biological perspective. However, their usage depends on the author: some prefer to reserve cilia for shorter appendages and flagella for longer ones, while others prefer cilia for eukaryotes and flagella for prokaryotes. The term 'undulipodium' was proposed to unify the two concepts, as it refers specifically to the homologousmicrotubular structure found in both, but not found in prokaryotic flagella.[23][24][25]
^A 2007 report on protist diversity included a table listing the described number of species for protist and fungal groups. The total sum of the listed species, excluding fungi, is 76,144.[52]
^ abThe phylum Percolozoa is usually better known as Heterolobosea.[1][60] However, in the strictest sense, Heterolobosea refers only to a class within this phylum, containing the orders Acrasida and Schizopyrenida. The name Percolozoa encompasses these and other related single-celled protists, not just the 'true' heteroloboseans.[9]
^ abcO'Malley MA, Simpson AG, Roger AJ (2012). "The other eukaryotes in light of evolutionary protistology". Biology & Philosophy. 28 (2): 299–330. doi:10.1007/s10539-012-9354-y. S2CID85406712.
^ abcCavalier-Smith T (August 1998). "A revised six-kingdom system of life". Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society. 73 (3): 203–266. doi:10.1111/j.1469-185X.1998.tb00030.x. PMID9809012.
^Tedersoo, Leho; Sánchez-Ramírez, Santiago; Kõljalg, Urmas; Bahram, Mohammad; Döring, Markus; Schigel, Dmitry; May, Tom; Ryberg, Martin; Abarenkov, Kessy (2018), "High-level classification of the Fungi and a tool for evolutionary ecological analyses", Fungal Diversity, 90: 135–159, doi:10.1007/s13225-018-0401-0, hdl:10138/238983, S2CID21714270
^Richard Barnes; Stephen Kent (2001). The Invertebrates: A Synthesis. Wiley-Blackwell. p. 41. ISBN978-0-632-04761-1.
^ abcdefghijklmnopqrstuSimpson, Alastair G. B.; Slamovits, Claudio H.; Archibald, John M. (2017). "Protist Diversity and Eukaryote Phylogeny". In Archibald, John M.; Simpson, Alastair G.B.; Slamovits, Claudio H. (eds.). Handbook of the Protists. Vol. 1 (2nd ed.). Springer. pp. 1–22. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-28149-0_45. ISBN978-3-319-28147-6.
^Andersen, R. A.; Barr, D. J. S.; Lynn, D. H.; Melkonian, M.; Moestrup, Ø.; Sleigh, M. A. (1991). "Terminology and nomenclature of the cytoskeletal elements associated with the flagellar/ciliary apparatus in protists". Protoplasma. 164 (1–3): 1–8. doi:10.1007/BF01320809.
^Gleason, Frank H.; Lilje, Osu; Lange, Lene (2018). "What has happened to the "aquatic phycomycetes" (sensu Sparrow)? Part II: Shared properties of zoosporic true fungi and fungus-like microorganisms". Fungal Biology Reviews. 32 (2): 52–61. Bibcode:2018FunBR..32...52G. doi:10.1016/j.fbr.2017.09.003.
^Neuhauser, Sigrid; Glockling, Sally L.; Leaño, Eduardo M.; Lilje, Osu; Marano, Agostina V.; Gleason, Frank H. (2012). "An introduction to fungus-like microorganisms". In Jones, E. B. Gareth; Pang, Ka-Lai (eds.). Marine fungi. Marine and Freshwater Botany. De Gruyter. pp. 137–152. doi:10.1515/9783110264067.137. ISBN9783110264067.
^ abcdeLevandowsky, Michael (2012). "Physiological Adaptations of Protists". In Sperelakis, Nicholas (ed.). Cell Physiology Sourcebook: Essentials of Membrane Biophysics (Fourth ed.). Amsterdam; Boston: Elsevier/AP. pp. 874–890. ISBN978-0-12-387738-3.
^Bernstein H, Bernstein C, Michod RE (2012). "Chapter 1. DNA repair as the primary adaptive function of sex in bacteria and eukaryotes". In Kimura S, Shimizu S (eds.). DNA Repair: New Research. Hauppauge, N.Y.: Nova Sci. Publ. pp. 1–49. ISBN978-1-62100-808-8.
^ abcAdl, Sina M.; Leander, Brian S.; Simpson, Alastair G. B.; Archibald, John M.; Anderson, O. Roger; Bass, David; Bowser, Samuel S.; Brugerolle, Guy; Farmer, Mark A.; Karpov, Sergey; Kolisko, Martin; Lane, Christopher E.; Lodge, Deborah J.; Mann, David G.; Meisterfeld, Ralf; Mendoza, Leonel; Moestrup, Øjvind; Mozley-Standridge, Sharon E.; Smirnov, Alexey V.; Spiegel, Frederick (2007). "Diversity, Nomenclature, and Taxonomy of Protists". Systematic Biology. 56 (4): 684–689. doi:10.1080/10635150701494127. PMID17661235.
^Brown MW, et al. (2018), "Phylogenomics Places Orphan Protistan Lineages in a Novel Eukaryotic Super-Group", Genome Biology and Evolution, 10 (2): 427–433, doi:10.1093/gbe/evy014, PMC5793813, PMID29360967
^ abcEglit, Yana; Shiratori, Takashi; Jerlström-Hultqvist, Jon; Williamson, Kelsey; Roger, Andrew J.; Ishida, Ken-Ichiro; Simpson, Alastair G.B. (22 January 2024). "Meteora sporadica, a protist with incredible cell architecture, is related to Hemimastigophora". Current Biology. 34 (2): 451–459. Bibcode:2024CBio...34E.451E. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2023.12.032. PMID38262350.
^ abcdeMadigan, Michael T.; Bender, Kelly S.; Buckley, Daniel H.; Sattley, W. Matthew; Stahl, David A. (2019). "Diversity of Microbial Eukarya". Brock Biology of Microorganisms (15th, Global ed.). Pearson. pp. 593–618. ISBN9781292235103.
^Simpson, Alastair G. B. (2003). "Cytoskeletal organization, phylogenetic affinities and systematics in the contentious taxon Excavata (Eukaryota)". International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 53 (6): 1759–1777. doi:10.1099/ijs.0.02578-0. PMID14657103.
^Suzuki-Tellier, Sei; Kiørboe, Thomas; Simpson, Alastair G. B. (2023). "The function of the feeding groove of 'typical excavate' flagellates". Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology. 71 (2): e13016. doi:10.1111/jeu.13016. PMID38108228.
^ abPánek, Tomáš; Simpson, Alastair G. B.; Brown, Matthew W.; Dyer, Betsey Dexter (2017). "Heterolobosea". In Archibald, John M.; Simpson, Alastair G.B.; Slamovits, Claudio H. (eds.). Handbook of the Protists. Vol. 2 (2nd ed.). Springer. pp. 1005–1046. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-28149-0_10. ISBN978-3-319-28147-6.
^ abSimpson, Alastair G. B. (2017). "Jakobida". In Archibald, John M.; Simpson, Alastair G.B.; Slamovits, Claudio H. (eds.). Handbook of the Protists. Vol. 2 (2nd ed.). Springer. pp. 973–1004. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-28149-0_6. ISBN978-3-319-28147-6.
^Heiss AA, Warring SD, Lukacs K, Favate J, Yang A, Gyaltshen Y, Filardi C, Simpson AGB, Kim E (December 2020). "Description of Imasa heleensis, gen. nov., sp. nov. (Imasidae, fam. nov.), a Deep-Branching Marine Malawimonad and Possible Key Taxon in Understanding Early Eukaryotic Evolution". Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology. 68 (2): e12837. doi:10.1111/jeu.12837. PMID33274482.
^Cho, Anna; Tikhonenkov, Denis V.; Lax, Gordon; Prokina, Kristina I.; Keeling, Patrick J. (2025). "Phylogenomic position of genetically diverse phagotrophic stramenopile flagellates in the sediment-associated MAST-6 lineage and a potentially halotolerant placididean". Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 190: 107964. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2023.107964. PMID37951557.
^Mann, David G.; Crawford, Richard M.; Round, Frank E. (2017). "Bacillariophyta". In Archibald, John M.; Simpson, Alastair G.B.; Slamovits, Claudio H. (eds.). Handbook of the Protists. Vol. 1 (2nd ed.). Springer. pp. 205–266. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-28149-0_29. ISBN978-3-319-28147-6.
^Kawai, Hiroshi; Henry, Eric C. (2017). "Phaeophyta". In Archibald, John M.; Simpson, Alastair G.B.; Slamovits, Claudio H. (eds.). Handbook of the Protists. Vol. 1 (2nd ed.). Springer. pp. 267–304. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-28149-0_31. ISBN978-3-319-28147-6.
^Kristiansen, Jørgen; Škaloud, Pavel (2017). "Chrysophyta". In Archibald, John M.; Simpson, Alastair G.B.; Slamovits, Claudio H. (eds.). Handbook of the Protists. Vol. 1 (2nd ed.). Springer. pp. 331–366. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-28149-0_43. ISBN978-3-319-28147-6.
^Lynn, Denis H. (2017). "Ciliophora". In Archibald, John M.; Simpson, Alastair G.B.; Slamovits, Claudio H. (eds.). Handbook of the Protists. Vol. 1 (2nd ed.). Springer. pp. 679–730. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-28149-0_23. ISBN978-3-319-28147-6.
^Votýpka, Jan; Modrý, David; Oborník, Miroslav; Šlapeta, Jan; Lukeš, Julius (2017). "Apicomplexa". In Archibald, John M.; Simpson, Alastair G.B.; Slamovits, Claudio H. (eds.). Handbook of the Protists. Vol. 1 (2nd ed.). Springer. pp. 567–624. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-28149-0_20. ISBN978-3-319-28147-6.
^ abSaldarriaga, Juan F.; Taylor, F. J. R. 'Max' (2017). "Dinoflagellata". In Archibald, John M.; Simpson, Alastair G.B.; Slamovits, Claudio H. (eds.). Handbook of the Protists. Vol. 1 (2nd ed.). Springer. pp. 625–678. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-28149-0_22. ISBN978-3-319-28147-6.
^ abBoltovskoy, Demetrio; Anderson, O. Roger; Correa, Nancy M. (2017). "Radiolaria and Phaeodaria". In Archibald, John M.; Simpson, Alastair G.B.; Slamovits, Claudio H. (eds.). Handbook of the Protists. Vol. 1 (2nd ed.). Springer. pp. 731–764. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-28149-0_19. ISBN978-3-319-28147-6.
^ abDumack, Kenneth; Mylnikov, Alexander P.; Bonkowski, Michael (July 2017). "Evolutionary Relationship of the Scale-Bearing Kraken (incertae sedis, Monadofilosa, Cercozoa, Rhizaria): Combining Ultrastructure Data and a Two-Gene Phylogeny". Protist. 168 (3): 362–373. doi:10.1016/j.protis.2017.04.004. PMID28582680.
^Brown, Matthew W.; Kolisko, Martin; Silberman, Jeffrey D.; Rogers, Andrew J. (2012). "Aggregative multicellularity evolved independently in the eukaryotic supergroup Rhizaria". Current Biology. 22 (12): 1123–1127. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2012.04.021. PMID22608512.
^Gast, Rebecca J. (2017). "Centrohelida and Other Heliozoan-Like Protists". In Archibald, John M.; Simpson, Alastair G.B.; Slamovits, Claudio H. (eds.). Handbook of the Protists. Vol. 2 (2nd ed.). Springer. pp. 955–1004. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-28149-0_28. ISBN978-3-319-28147-6.
^ abCavalier-Smith; Chao; Lewis (2015), "Multiple origins of Heliozoa from flagellate ancestors: New cryptist subphylum Corbihelia, superclass Corbistoma, and monophyly of Haptista, Cryptista, Hacrobia and Chromista", Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 93: 331–362, Bibcode:2015MolPE..93..331C, doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2015.07.004, PMID26234272
^Zagumyonnyi, Dmitry G.; Radaykina, Liudmila V.; Keeling, Patrick J.; Tikhonenkov, Denis V. (2022). "Centrohelid heliozoans of Ukraine with a description of a new genus and species (Haptista: Centroplasthelida)". European Journal of Protistology. 86: 125916. doi:10.1016/j.ejop.2022.125916.
^Hoef-Emden, Kerstin; Archibald, John M. (2017). "Cryptophyta (Cryptomonads)". In Archibald, John M.; Simpson, Alastair G.B.; Slamovits, Claudio H. (eds.). Handbook of the Protists. Vol. 2 (2nd ed.). Springer. pp. 851–892. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-28149-0_35. ISBN978-3-319-28147-6.
^ abOlivier De Clerck; Kenny A. Bogaert; Frederik Leliaert (2012). "Chapter Two – Diversity and Evolution of Algae: Primary Endosymbiosis". In Gwenaël Piganeau (ed.). Advances in Botanical Research. Vol. 64. Academic Press. pp. 55–86. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-391499-6.00002-5. ISBN9780123914996. ISSN0065-2296.
^Yoon, Hwan Su; Nelson, Wendy; Lindstrom, Sandra C.; Boo, Sung Min; Pueschel, Curt; Qiu, Huan; Bhattacharya, Debashish (2017). "Rhodophyta". In Archibald, John M.; Simpson, Alastair G.B.; Slamovits, Claudio H. (eds.). Handbook of the Protists. Vol. 1 (2nd ed.). Springer. pp. 89–135. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-28149-0_33. ISBN978-3-319-28147-6.
^Schön, Max E.; Zlatogursky, Vasily V.; Singh, Rohan P.; Poirier, Camille; Wilken, Susanne; Mathur, Varsha; Strassert, Jürgen F. H.; Pinhassi, Jarone; Z. Worden, Alexandra; Keeling, Patrick J.; Ettema, Thijs J. G.; Wideman, Jeremy G.; Burki, Fabien (2021). "Single cell genomics reveals plastid-lacking Picozoa are close relatives of red algae". Nature Communications. 12: 6651. doi:10.1038/s41467-021-26918-0.
^Hall, John D.; MCCourt, Richard M. (2017). "Zygnematophyta". In Archibald, John M.; Simpson, Alastair G.B.; Slamovits, Claudio H. (eds.). Handbook of the Protists. Vol. 1 (2nd ed.). Springer. pp. 135–163. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-28149-0_41. ISBN978-3-319-28147-6.
^McCourt, Richard M.; Karol, Kenneth G.; Hall, John D.; Casanova, Michelle T.; Grant, Michael C. (2017). "Charophyceae (Charales)". In Archibald, John M.; Simpson, Alastair G.B.; Slamovits, Claudio H. (eds.). Handbook of the Protists. Vol. 1 (2nd ed.). Springer. pp. 165–183. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-28149-0_40. ISBN978-3-319-28147-6.
^Cook, Martha E.; Graham, Linda E. (2017). "Chlorokybophyceae, Klebsormidiophyceae, Coleochaetophyceae". In Archibald, John M.; Simpson, Alastair G.B.; Slamovits, Claudio H. (eds.). Handbook of the Protists. Vol. 1 (2nd ed.). Springer. pp. 185–204. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-28149-0_36. ISBN978-3-319-28147-6.
^Lamża, Łukasz (December 2023). "Diversity of 'simple' multicellular eukaryotes: 45 independent cases and six types of multicellularity". Biological Reviews. 98 (6): 2188–2209. doi:10.1111/brv.13001. PMID37475165.
^ abBrown, Matthew W.; Sharpe, Susan C.; Silberman, Jeffrey D.; Heiss, Aaron A.; Lang, B. Franz; Simpson, Alastair G. B.; Roger, Andrew J. (28 August 2013). "Phylogenomics demonstrates that breviate flagellates are related to opisthokonts and apusomonads". Proceedings of the Royal Society B. Biological Sciences. 280 (1769): 20131755. doi:10.1098/rspb.2013.1755.
^Torruella G, Galindo LJ, Moreira D, Ciobanu M, Heiss AA, Yubuki N, et al. (2022). "Expanding the molecular and morphological diversity of Apusomonadida, a deep-branching group of gliding bacterivorous protists". Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology. 70 (2): e12956. doi:10.1111/jeu.12956. hdl:2117/404026. PMID36453005. S2CID253460648.
^Smirnov, Alexey; Nassonova, Elena; Berney, Cédric; Fahrni, José; Bolivar, Ignacio; Pawlowski, Jan (2005). "Molecular Phylogeny and Classification of the Lobose Amoebae". Protist. 156 (2): 129–142. doi:10.1016/j.protis.2005.06.002. PMID16171181.
^Page, Frederick C. (1987). "The Classification of 'Naked' Amoebae (Phylum Rhizopoda)". Archiv für Protistenkunde. 133 (3–4): 199–217. doi:10.1016/S0003-9365(87)80053-2.
^Brown, Matthew W.; Silberman, Jeffrey D.; Spiegel, Frederick W. (26 November 2010). ""Slime Molds" among the Tubulinea (Amoebozoa): Molecular Systematics and Taxonomy of Copromyxa". Protist. 162 (2): 277–287. doi:10.1016/j.protis.2010.09.003. PMID21112814.
^Kang, Seungho; Tice, Alexander K; Spiegel, Frederick W; Silberman, Jeffrey D; Pánek, Tomáš; Čepička, Ivan; Kostka, Martin; Kosakyan, Anush; Alcântara, Daniel M C; Roger, Andrew J; Shadwick, Lora L; Smirnov, Alexey; Kudryavtsev, Alexander; Lahr, Daniel J G; Brown, Matthew W (September 2017). "Between a Pod and a Hard Test: The Deep Evolution of Amoebae". Molecular Biology and Evolution. 34 (9): 2258–2270. doi:10.1093/molbev/msx162. PMC5850466. PMID28505375.
^Berney, Cédric; Geisen, Stefan; Van Wichelen, Jeroen; Nitsche, Frank; Vanormelingen, Pieter; Bonkowski, Michael; Bass, David (20 April 2015). "Expansion of the 'Reticulosphere': Diversity of Novel Branching and Network-forming Amoebae Helps to Define Variosea (Amoebozoa)". Protist. 166 (2): 271–295. doi:10.1016/j.protis.2015.04.001. PMID25965302.
^Cali, Ann; Becnel, James J.; Takvorian, Peter M. (2017). "Microsporidia". In Archibald, John M.; Simpson, Alastair G.B.; Slamovits, Claudio H. (eds.). Handbook of the Protists. Vol. 2 (2nd ed.). Springer. pp. 1559–1618. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-28149-0_27. ISBN978-3-319-28147-6.
^Galindo, Luis Javier; Torruella, Guifré; López-García, Purificación; Ciobanu, Maria; Gutiérrez-Preciado, Ana; Karpov, Sergey A.; Moreira, David (28 July 2022). "Phylogenomics Supports the Monophyly of Aphelids and Fungi and Identifies New Molecular Synapomorphies". Systematic Biology. 72 (3): 505–515. doi:10.1093/sysbio/syac054. PMID35900180.
^Richter, Daniel J.; Nitsche, Frank (2017). "Choanoflagellatea". In Archibald, John M.; Simpson, Alastair G.B.; Slamovits, Claudio H. (eds.). Handbook of the Protists. Vol. 2 (2nd ed.). Springer. pp. 1479–1496. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-28149-0_5. ISBN978-3-319-28147-6.
^Glockling, Sally L.; Marshall, Wyth L.; Gleason, Frank H. (25 April 2013). "Phylogenetic interpretations and ecological potentials of the Mesomycetozoea (Ichthyosporea)". Fungal Ecology. 6 (4): 237–247. doi:10.1016/j.funeco.2013.03.005.
^Urrutia, Ander; Mitsi, Konstantina; Foster, Rachel; Ross, Stuart; Carr, Martin; Ward, Georgia M.; van Aerle, Ronny; Marigomez, Ionan; Leger, Michelle M.; Ruiz-Trillo, Iñaqui; Feist, Stephen W.; Bass, David (2022). "Txikispora philomaios n. sp., n. g., a micro-eukaryotic pathogen of amphipods, reveals parasitism and hidden diversity in Class Filasterea". Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology. 69 (2): e12875. doi:10.1111/jeu.12875. PMID34726818.
^Hehenberger, Elisabeth; Tikhonenkov, Denis V.; Kolisko, Martin; del Campo, Javier; Esaulov, Anton S.; Mylnikov, Alexander P.; Keeling, Patrick J. (10 July 2017). "Novel Predators Reshape Holozoan Phylogeny and Reveal the Presence of a Two-Component Signaling System in the Ancestor of Animals". Current Biology. 27 (13): 2043–2050. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2017.06.006. PMID28648822.
^Metz S, Huber P, Accattatis V, Lopes dos Santos A, Bigeard E, Unrein F, Chambouvet A, Not F, Lara E, Devercelli M (2022). "Freshwater protists: unveiling the unexplored in a large floodplain system". Environmental Microbiology. 24 (4): 1731–1745. Bibcode:2022EnvMi..24.1731M. doi:10.1111/1462-2920.15838. PMID34783136. S2CID244133100.
^Rothäusler, Eva; Gutow, Lars; Thiel, Martin (1 January 2012). "Floating Seaweeds and Their Communities". In Wiencke, Christian; Bischof, Kai (eds.). Seaweed Biology: Novel Insights into Ecophysiology, Ecology and Utilization. Ecological Studies. Vol. 219. Springer. pp. 359–380. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-28451-9_17. ISBN978-3-642-28451-9.
^ abcdefGeisen, Stefan; Mitchell, Edward A. D.; Adl, Sina; Bonkowski, Michael; Dunthorn, Micah; Ekelund, Flemming; Fernández, Leonardo D.; Jousset, Alexandre; Krashevska, Valentyna; Singer, David; Spiegel, Frederick W.; Walochnik, Julia; Lara, Enrique (May 2018). "Soil protists: a fertile frontier in soil biology research". FEMS Microbiology Reviews. 42 (3): 293–323. doi:10.1093/femsre/fuy006. PMID29447350.
^ abBarry S. C. Leadbeater; Sharon M. M. McReady (2000). "Chapter 1. The flagellates: historical perspectives". In Barry S. C. Leadbeater; J. C. Green (eds.). The Flagellates. Unity, diversity and evolution. London: Taylor & Francis. pp. 1–26. doi:10.1201/9781482268225. ISBN9780429182136.
^Goldfuß (1818). "Ueber die Classification der Zoophyten" [On the classification of zoophytes]. Isis, Oder, Encyclopädische Zeitung von Oken (in German). 2 (6): 1008–1019. From p. 1008: "Erste Klasse. Urthiere. Protozoa." (First class. Primordial animals. Protozoa.) [Note: each column of each page of this journal is numbered; there are two columns per page.]
^Carl Theodor Ernst von Siebold; Hermann Stannius (1846–1848). Lehrbuch der vergleichenden Anatomie Vol. 1: Wirbellose Thiere [Textbook of Comparative Anatomy Vol. 1: Invertebrate Animals] (in German). Vol. 1. Berlin, Germany: Veit. p. 3. p. 3: Erste Hauptgruppe. Protozoa. Thiere, in welchen die verschiedenen Systeme der Organe nicht scharf ausgeschieden sind, und deren unregelmässige Form und einfache Organisation sich auf eine Zelle reduziren lassen. [First principal group. Protozoa. Animals, in which the different systems of organs are not sharply separated, and whose irregular form and simple organization can be reduced to one cell.]
^John Hogg (1860). "On the distinctions of a Plant and an Animal, and on a Fourth Kingdom of Nature". Edinburgh New Philosophical Journal. 2nd series. 12: 216–225. p. 223: ... I here suggest a fourth or an additional kingdom, under the title of the Primigenal kingdom, ... This Primigenal kingdom would comprise all the lower creatures, or the primary organic beings, – 'Protoctista,' – from πρώτος, first, and χτιστά, created beings; ...
^Haeckel, Ernst (1866). Generelle Morphologie der Organismen [The General Morphology of Organisms] (in German). Vol. 1. Berlin, (Germany): G. Reimer. pp. 215ff. From p. 215: "VII. Character des Protistenreiches." (VII. Character of the kingdom of Protists.)
^O'Malley, Maureen A. (2022). "Getting at the Basics of Multicellularity". In Herron, Matthew D.; Conlin, Peter L.; Ratcliff, William C. (eds.). The Evolution of Multicellularity. Evolutionary Cell Biology (1st ed.). CRC Press. pp. 9–24. doi:10.1201/9780429351907. ISBN9780429351907. S2CID248578172.
^Chang, Shan; Feng, Qinglai; Zhang, Lei (14 August 2018). "New Siliceous Microfossils from the Terreneuvian Yanjiahe Formation, South China: The Possible Earliest Radiolarian Fossil Record". Journal of Earth Science. 29 (4): 912–919. Bibcode:2018JEaSc..29..912C. doi:10.1007/s12583-017-0960-0. S2CID134890245.
^Zhang, Ke; Feng, Qing-Lai (September 2019). "Early Cambrian radiolarians and sponge spicules from the Niujiaohe Formation in South China". Palaeoworld. 28 (3): 234–242. doi:10.1016/j.palwor.2019.04.001. S2CID146452469.
Hausmann, K., N. Hulsmann, R. Radek. Protistology. Schweizerbart'sche Verlagsbuchshandlung, Stuttgart, 2003.
Margulis, L., J.O. Corliss, M. Melkonian, D.J. Chapman. Handbook of Protoctista. Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Boston, 1990.
Margulis, L., K.V. Schwartz. Five Kingdoms: An Illustrated Guide to the Phyla of Life on Earth, 3rd ed. New York: W.H. Freeman, 1998.
Margulis, L., L. Olendzenski, H.I. McKhann. Illustrated Glossary of the Protoctista, 1993.
Margulis, L., M.J. Chapman. Kingdoms and Domains: An Illustrated Guide to the Phyla of Life on Earth. Amsterdam: Academic Press/Elsevier, 2009.
Schaechter, M. Eukaryotic microbes. Amsterdam, Academic Press, 2012.
Physiology, ecology and paleontology
Fontaneto, D. Biogeography of Microscopic Organisms. Is Everything Small Everywhere? Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2011.
Moore, R. C., and other editors. Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology. Protista, part B (vol. 1[permanent dead link], Charophyta, vol. 2, Chrysomonadida, Coccolithophorida, Charophyta, Diatomacea & Pyrrhophyta), part C (Sarcodina, Chiefly "Thecamoebians" and Foraminiferida) and part D[permanent dead link] (Chiefly Radiolaria and Tintinnina). Boulder, Colorado: Geological Society of America; & Lawrence, Kansas: University of Kansas Press.
Tsukii, Y. (1996). Protist Information Server (database of protist images). Laboratory of Biology, Hosei University. Protist Information Server. Updated: March 22, 2016.
American lawyer and politician (1837–1916) Harrison E. HavensMember of the U.S. House of Representativesfrom MissouriIn officeMarch 4, 1871 – March 3, 1875Preceded byAbram ComingoSucceeded byRobert Anthony HatcherConstituency4th district (1871–1873)6th district (1873–1875) Personal detailsBorn(1837-12-15)December 15, 1837Franklin County, Ohio, USDiedAugust 16, 1916(1916-08-16) (aged 78)Havana, CubaResting placeColon Cemetery, HavanaPolitical partyRepublican H...
العلاقات الإماراتية الإيطالية الإمارات العربية المتحدة إيطاليا الإمارات العربية المتحدة إيطاليا تعديل مصدري - تعديل العلاقات الإماراتية الإيطالية هي العلاقات الثنائية التي تجمع بين الإمارات العربية المتحدة وإيطاليا.[1][2][3][4][5] مقار...
العلاقات المجرية الكوبية المجر كوبا المجر كوبا تعديل مصدري - تعديل العلاقات المجرية الكوبية هي العلاقات الثنائية التي تجمع بين المجر وكوبا.[1][2][3][4][5] مقارنة بين البلدين هذه مقارنة عامة ومرجعية للدولتين: وجه المقارنة المجر كوبا المساح�...
American Hotel and Lodging AssociationAbbreviationAHLAPredecessorAmerican Hotel Protective Association, 1910American Hotel Association, 1917American Hotel and Motel Association, 1962FormationJanuary 1, 1953 (71 years ago) (1953-01-01)TypeNGOLegal statusTrade associationPurposeHospitality industry resourceHeadquartersWashington, D.C., U.S.Location1201 Northwest New York Avenue, 20005Coordinates38°54′04″N 77°01′42″W / 38.901023°N 77.028464°W / 3...
Pemandangan sebuah jembatan kayu di Topčider. Bekas kediaman Pangeran Miloš. Topčider (aksara Kiril Serbia: Топчидер, pelafalan dalam bahasa Serbo-Croatian: [tɔ̝̌pt͡ʃide̞r]) adalah sebuah hutan kota yang terletak di kota Beograd, ibu kota Serbia. Kawasan ini terletak di munisipalitas Čukarica, Rakovica dan Savski Venac. Topčider terletak tidak jauh dari pusat kota Beograd, sehingga menjadi tempat rekreasi dan piknik bagi warga kota. Pada tahun 1831, Pangeran Miloš ...
Major League Baseball season Major League Baseball team season 1909 Detroit TigersAmerican League ChampionsLeagueAmerican LeagueBallparkBennett ParkCityDetroit, MichiganOwnersWilliam H. Yawkey and Frank NavinManagersHughie Jennings ← 1908 Seasons 1910 → The 1909 Detroit Tigers won the American League pennant with a record of 98–54, but lost to the Pittsburgh Pirates in the 1909 World Series, 4 games to 3. The season was their ninth since they were charter members ...
Гимн Киргизской Советской Социалистической Республикикирг. Қырғыз Кенештик Социалисттик Республикасының Мамлекеттик Гимни Автор слов Кубанычбек Маликов, Тугельбай Сыдыкбеков, Молдогазы Токобаев, Аалы Токомбаев, Е. Абайлдаев Композитор Владимир Власов, Абдылас Мал...
Austrian Catholic priest and philosopher (1838–1917) The ReverendFranz BrentanoFranz Brentano in 1890BornFranz Clemens Honoratus Hermann Josef Brentano16 January 1838Marienberg am Rhein [de],Rhineland, Prussia, German ConfederationDied17 March 1917 (1917-03-18) (aged 79)Zürich, SwitzerlandEducationUniversity of MunichUniversity of BerlinUniversity of MünsterUniversity of Tübingen(PhD, 1862)University of Würzburg(Dr. phil. hab., 1866)Spouses Ida Lieben(m. 1880–18...
B or Trainer 1937-built Tipsy B at the Schaffen-Diest (Belgium) rally in August 2009. Its registration incorporates the initials of its designer. Role Two-seat sport aircraftType of aircraft National origin Belgium Manufacturer Avions Tipsy, Gosselies Aerodrome, Charleroi[1] Designer Ernest Oscar Tips First flight 8 May 1937 Number built 42 The Tipsy B was a small sports two-seat monoplane designed by Ernest Oscar Tips, and built in both Belgium and the UK. A total of 42 was built, a...
PT Bank Capital Indonesia TbkJenisPublikKode emitenIDX: BACAIndustrijasa keuanganDidirikanJakarta, Indonesia (1989)KantorpusatMenara Jamsostek, Jakarta, IndonesiaTokohkunciWahyu Dwi Aji (Direktur Utama)ProdukPerbankanPendapatanRp 367 miliar (2017), Rp 430 miliar (2018) Laba bersihRp 86 miliar (2017), Rp 106 miliar (2018)Karyawan814 orang (2018)Situs webwww.bankcapital.co.id Bank Capital Indonesia atau lebih dikenal sebagai Bank Capital adalah sebuah bank yang berdiri sejak 1989 dan berkantor ...
البوابة أحدث التغييرات مشروع ويكي ألعاب أولمبية في ويكيبيديا العربية يوجد 40٬014 مقالة مرتبطة بموضوع الألعاب الأولمبية. عدل بوابة ألعاب أولمبية علم الأولمبياد ألعاب أوليمبية أو الأولمبياد حدث رياضي دولي يشمل الألعاب الرياضية الصيفية والشتوية، يشارك فيه الرياضيون م...
2000 video gameAsterix & Obelix Take On CaesarDeveloper(s)Tek 5Publisher(s)Cryo InteractiveSeriesAsterix & ObelixPlatform(s)PlayStation, PC, Game Boy ColorReleasePlayStationEU: June 1, 2000Game Boy ColorEU: August 2000WindowsEU: November 6, 2000Genre(s)Action gameMode(s)Single-player, multiplayer Asterix & Obelix Take On Caesar (French: Astérix & Obélix contre César) is an action video game developed by French studio Tek 5 and published by Cryo Interactive, which was releas...
Architectural framework of telecommunications This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages) This article may be too technical for most readers to understand. Please help improve it to make it understandable to non-experts, without removing the technical details. (December 2010) (Learn how and when to remove this message) This article may have confusing or ambiguous abbreviations. Please...
Pour les articles homonymes, voir Hauterive. Hauterive La mairie. Administration Pays France Région Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes Département Allier Arrondissement Vichy Intercommunalité Communauté d'agglomération Vichy Communauté Maire Mandat Didier Corre 2020-2026 Code postal 03270 Code commune 03126 Démographie Gentilé Hauterivois Populationmunicipale 1 186 hab. (2021 ) Densité 147 hab./km2 Géographie Coordonnées 46° 05′ 21″ nord, 3° 26′ ...
Boeing Model 7 adalah pesawat biplan perahu terbang Amerika dibangun oleh Boeing pada tahun 1920. Pilot dan dua penumpang semua duduk di kokpit, para penumpang tepat di belakang pilot. Referensi Wikimedia Commons memiliki media mengenai Boeing aircraft. Bowers, Peter M. Boeing aircraft since 1916. London: Putnam Aeronautical Books, 1989. ISBN 0-85177-804-6. lbsPesawat BoeingDaftar pesawat Boeing USA Bermesin piston 40A 80 221 247 307 314 377 Bermesin jet 367-80 707/720 717 727 737 ...
Australian actress Yael StoneStone at PaleyFest 2014, representing Orange Is the New BlackBornSydney, New South Wales, AustraliaEducationNational Institute of Dramatic Art (BFA)OccupationActressYears active1999–presentSpouse Dan Spielman (m. 2012; div. 2016)PartnerJack Manning Bancroft (2017–present)Children2RelativesElana Stone (sister) Yael Stone is an Australian actress. She has worked extensively in Australian theatre and has wo...
Questa voce sull'argomento calciatrici è solo un abbozzo. Contribuisci a migliorarla secondo le convenzioni di Wikipedia. Segui i suggerimenti del progetto di riferimento. Marie HammarströmNazionalità Svezia Altezza172 cm Calcio RuoloEx-centrocampista Termine carriera2013 CarrieraGiovanili Glanshammars IF Squadre di club1 1999-2003 Karlsunds? (?)2004 Umeå IK? (?)2004-2012 KIF Örebro? (?)2013 Kopparbergs/Göteborg22 (6) Nazionale 2008-2013 Svezia43 (5) Palmarès ...
Halaman ini memuat daftar peluru kendali udara ke udara. Daftar ini mungkin belumlah lengkap. MBDA Meteor Beyond Visual Range Air-to-Air Missile. SD-10A dengan JF-17 dalam Farnborough International Airshow 2010. PL-12 (PiLi-12, 霹雳-12), juga disebut SD-10 (ShanDian-10, 闪电-10), adalah peluru kendali udara ke udara berpandu radar yang dikembangkan China's Luoyang Electro-Optical Technology Development Center. Brasil Mectron MAA-1 Piranha - jarak pendek berpandu inframerah. Prancis Matra ...