A typical Jew in Jesus's time had only one name, sometimes followed by the phrase "son of [father's name]", or the individual's hometown.[28] Thus, in the New Testament, Jesus is commonly referred to as "Jesus of Nazareth".[l] Jesus's neighbours in Nazareth referred to him as "the carpenter, the son of Mary and brother of James and Joses and Judas and Simon", "the carpenter's son", or "Joseph's son"; in the Gospel of John, the disciple Philip refers to him as "Jesus son of Joseph from Nazareth".
The English name Jesus, from Greek Iēsous, is a rendering of Joshua (Hebrew Yehoshua, later Yeshua), and was not uncommon in Judea at the time of the birth of Jesus. Popular etymology linked the names Yehoshua and Yeshua to the verb meaning "save" and the noun "salvation".[29] The Gospel of Matthew tells of an angel that appeared to Joseph instructing him "to name him Jesus, for he will save his people from their sins".[30]
Jesus Christ
Since the early period of Christianity, Christians have commonly referred to Jesus as "Jesus Christ".[31] The word Christ was a title or office ("the Christ"), not a given name.[32][33] It derives from the Greek Χριστός (Christos),[34][35] a translation of the Hebrew mashiakh (משיח) meaning "anointed", and is usually transliterated into English as "messiah".[36] In biblical Judaism, sacred oil was used to anoint certain exceptionally holy people and objects as part of their religious investiture.[37]
Christians of the time designated Jesus as "the Christ" because they believed him to be the messiah, whose arrival is prophesied in the Hebrew Bible and Old Testament. In postbiblical usage, Christ became viewed as a name—one part of "Jesus Christ". Etymons of the term Christian (meaning a follower of Christ) has been in use since the 1st century.[38]
The canonical gospels are four accounts, each by a different author. The authors of the Gospels are pseudonymous, attributed by tradition to the four evangelists, each with close ties to Jesus:[55] Mark by John Mark, an associate of Peter;[56]Matthew by one of Jesus's disciples;[55]Luke by a companion of Paul mentioned in a few epistles;[55] and John by another of Jesus's disciples,[55] the "beloved disciple".[57]
According to the Marcan priority, the first to be written was the Gospel of Mark (written AD 60–75), followed by the Gospel of Matthew (AD 65–85), the Gospel of Luke (AD 65–95), and the Gospel of John (AD 75–100).[58] Most scholars agree that the authors of Matthew and Luke used Mark as a source for their gospels. Since Matthew and Luke also share some content not found in Mark, many scholars assume that they used another source (commonly called the "Q source") in addition to Mark.[59]
One important aspect of the study of the Gospels is the literary genre under which they fall. Genre "is a key convention guiding both the composition and the interpretation of writings".[60] Whether the gospel authors set out to write novels, myths, histories, or biographies has a tremendous impact on how they ought to be interpreted. Some recent studies suggest that the genre of the Gospels ought to be situated within the realm of ancient biography.[61][62][63] Although not without critics,[64] the position that the Gospels are a type of ancient biography is the consensus among scholars today.[65][66]
Concerning the accuracy of the accounts, viewpoints run the gamut from considering them inerrant descriptions of Jesus's life,[67] to doubting whether they are historically reliable on a number of points,[68] to considering them to provide very little historical information about his life beyond the basics.[69][70] According to a broad scholarly consensus, the Synoptic Gospels (the first three—Matthew, Mark, and Luke) are the most reliable sources of information about Jesus.[71][72][28]
Matthew, Mark, and Luke are known as the Synoptic Gospels, from the Greek σύν (syn, 'together') and ὄψις (opsis, 'view'),[73][74][75] because they are similar in content, narrative arrangement, language and paragraph structure, and one can easily set them next to each other and synoptically compare what is in them.[73][74][76] Scholars generally agree that it is impossible to find any direct literary relationship between the Synoptic Gospels and the Gospel of John.[77] While the flow of many events (e.g., Jesus's baptism, transfiguration, crucifixion and interactions with his apostles) are shared among the Synoptic Gospels, incidents such as the transfiguration and Jesus's exorcising demons[78] do not appear in John, which also differs on other matters, such as the Cleansing of the Temple.[79]
The Synoptics emphasize different aspects of Jesus. In Mark, Jesus is the Son of God whose mighty works demonstrate the presence of God's Kingdom.[56] He is a tireless wonder worker, the servant of both God and man.[80] This short gospel records a few of Jesus's words or teachings.[56] The Gospel of Matthew emphasizes that Jesus is the fulfilment of God's will as revealed in the Old Testament, and the Lord of the Church.[81] He is the "Son of David", a "king", and the Messiah.[80][82] Luke presents Jesus as the divine-human saviour who shows compassion to the needy.[83] He is the friend of sinners and outcasts, who came to seek and save the lost.[80] This gospel includes well-known parables, such as the Good Samaritan and the Prodigal Son.[83]
The prologue to the Gospel of John identifies Jesus as an incarnation of the divine Word (Logos).[84] As the Word, Jesus was eternally present with God, active in all creation, and the source of humanity's moral and spiritual nature.[84] Jesus is not only greater than any past human prophet but greater than any prophet could be. He not only speaks God's Word; he is God's Word.[85] In the Gospel of John, Jesus reveals his divine role publicly. Here he is the Bread of Life, the Light of the World, the True Vine and more.[80]
In general, the authors of the New Testament showed little interest in an absolute chronology of Jesus or in synchronizing the episodes of his life with the secular history of the age.[86] As stated in John 21:25, the Gospels do not claim to provide an exhaustive list of the events in Jesus's life.[87] The accounts were primarily written as theological documents in the context of early Christianity, with timelines as a secondary consideration.[88] In this respect, it is noteworthy that the Gospels devote about one third of their text to the last week of Jesus's life in Jerusalem, referred to as the Passion.[89] The Gospels do not provide enough details to satisfy the demands of modern historians regarding exact dates, but it is possible to draw from them a general picture of Jesus's life story.[68][86][88]
Jesus was Jewish,[10] born to Mary, wife of Joseph.[90] The Gospels of Matthew and Luke offer two accounts of his genealogy. Matthew traces Jesus's ancestry to Abraham through David.[91][92] Luke traces Jesus's ancestry through Adam to God.[93][94] The lists are identical between Abraham and David but differ radically from that point. Matthew has 27 generations from David to Joseph, whereas Luke has 42, with almost no overlap between the names on the two lists.[n][95] Various theories have been put forward to explain why the two genealogies are so different.[o]
Matthew and Luke each describe Jesus's birth, especially that Jesus was born to a virgin named Mary in Bethlehem in fulfilment of prophecy. Luke's account emphasizes events before the birth of Jesus and centers on Mary, while Matthew's mostly covers those after the birth and centers on Joseph.[96][97][98] Both accounts state that Mary, was engaged to a man named Joseph, who was descended from King David and was not his biological father, and both support the doctrine of the virgin birth of Jesus, according to which Jesus was miraculously conceived by the Holy Spirit in Mary's womb when she was still a virgin.[99][100][101] At the same time, there is evidence, at least in the Lukan Acts of the Apostles, that Jesus was thought to have had, like many figures in antiquity, a dual paternity, since there it is stated he descended from the seed or loins of David.[102] By taking him as his own, Joseph will give him the necessary Davidic descent.[103] Some scholars suggest that Jesus had Levite heritage from Mary, based on her blood relationship with Elizabeth.[104]
In Matthew, Joseph is troubled because Mary, his betrothed, is pregnant,[105] but in the first of Joseph's four dreams an angel assures him not to be afraid to take Mary as his wife because her child was conceived by the Holy Spirit.[106] In Matthew 2:1–12, wise men or Magi from the East bring gifts to the young Jesus as the King of the Jews. They find him in a house in Bethlehem. Herod the Great hears of Jesus's birth and, wanting him killed, orders the murders of male infants in Bethlehem and its surroundings. But an angel warns Joseph in his second dream, and the family flees to Egypt—later to return and settle in Nazareth.[106][107][108]
In Luke 1:31–38, Mary learns from the angel Gabriel that she will conceive and bear a child called Jesus through the action of the Holy Spirit.[97][99] When Mary is due to give birth, she and Joseph travel from Nazareth to Joseph's ancestral home in Bethlehem to register in the census ordered by Caesar Augustus. While there Mary gives birth to Jesus, and as they have found no room in the inn, she places the newborn in a manger.[109] An angel announces the birth to a group of shepherds, who go to Bethlehem to see Jesus, and subsequently spread the news abroad.[110] Luke 2:21 tells how Joseph and Mary have their baby circumcised on the eighth day after birth, and name him Jesus, as Gabriel had commanded Mary.[111] After the presentation of Jesus at the Temple, Joseph, Mary and Jesus return to Nazareth.[97][99]
Jesus's childhood home is identified in the Gospels of Luke and Matthew as Nazareth, a town in Galilee in present-day Israel, where he lived with his family. Although Joseph appears in descriptions of Jesus's childhood, no mention is made of him thereafter.[112][113] His other family members, including his mother, Mary, his four brothersJames, Joses (or Joseph), Judas, and Simon, and his unnamed sisters, are mentioned in the Gospels and other sources.[114] Jesus's maternal grandparents are named Joachim and Anne in the Gospel of James.[115] The Gospel of Luke records that Mary was a relative of Elizabeth, the mother of John the Baptist.[116] Extra-biblical contemporary sources consider Jesus and John the Baptist to be second cousins through the belief that Elizabeth was the daughter of Sobe, the sister of Anne.[117][118][119]
The Gospel of Mark reports that at the beginning of his ministry, Jesus comes into conflict with his neighbours and family.[120] Jesus's mother and brothers come to get him[121] because people are saying that he is crazy.[122] Jesus responds that his followers are his true family. In the Gospel of John, Jesus and his mother attend a wedding at Cana, where he performs his first miracle at her request.[123] Later, she follows him to his crucifixion, and he expresses concern over her well-being.[124]
Jesus is called a τέκτων (tektōn) in Mark 6:3, a term traditionally understood as carpenter but could also refer to makers of objects in various materials, including builders.[125][126] The Gospels indicate that Jesus could read, paraphrase, and debate scripture, but this does not necessarily mean that he received formal scribal training.[127]
The Gospel of Luke reports two journeys of Jesus and his parents in Jerusalem during his childhood. They come to the Temple in Jerusalem for the presentation of Jesus as a baby in accordance with Jewish Law, where a man named Simeon prophesies about Jesus and Mary.[128] When Jesus, at the age of twelve, goes missing on a pilgrimage to Jerusalem for Passover, his parents find him in the temple sitting among the teachers, listening to them and asking questions, and the people are amazed at his understanding and answers. Mary scolds Jesus for going missing, to which Jesus replies that he must "be in his father's house".[129]
Jesus and the devil depicted in The Temptation of Christ, by Ary Scheffer, 1854
In the Gospel of Mark, John the Baptist baptizes Jesus, and as he comes out of the water he sees the Holy Spirit descending to him like a dove and a voice comes from heaven declaring him to be God's Son.[137] This is one of two events described in the Gospels where a voice from Heaven calls Jesus "Son", the other being the Transfiguration.[138][139] The spirit then drives him into the wilderness where he is tempted by Satan.[140] Jesus then begins his ministry in Galilee after John's arrest.[141]
In the Gospel of Matthew, as Jesus comes to him to be baptized, John protests, saying, "I need to be baptized by you."[142] Jesus instructs him to carry on with the baptism "to fulfill all righteousness".[143] Matthew details three temptations that Satan offers Jesus in the wilderness.[144]
In the Gospel of Luke, the Holy Spirit descends as a dove after everyone has been baptized and Jesus is praying.[145] Later John implicitly recognizes Jesus after sending his followers to ask about him.[146] Luke also describes three temptations received by Jesus in the wilderness, before starting his ministry in Galilee.[147]
The Gospel of John leaves out Jesus's baptism and temptation.[148] Here, John the Baptist testifies that he saw the Spirit descend on Jesus.[149][150] John publicly proclaims Jesus as the sacrificial Lamb of God, and some of John's followers become disciples of Jesus.[72] Before John is imprisoned, Jesus leads his followers to baptize disciples as well,[151] and they baptize more people than John.[152]
The Synoptics depict two distinct geographical settings in Jesus's ministry. The first takes place north of Judea, in Galilee, where Jesus conducts a successful ministry, and the second shows Jesus rejected and killed when he travels to Jerusalem.[23] Often referred to as "rabbi",[23] Jesus preaches his message orally.[26] Notably, Jesus forbids those who recognize him as the messiah to speak of it, including people he heals and demons he exorcises (see Messianic Secret).[153]
John depicts Jesus's ministry as largely taking place in and around Jerusalem, rather than in Galilee; and Jesus's divine identity is openly proclaimed and immediately recognized.[85]
The Exhortation to the Apostles, by James Tissot, portrays Jesus talking to his 12 disciples.
Near the beginning of his ministry, Jesus appoints twelve apostles. In Matthew and Mark, despite Jesus only briefly requesting that they join him, Jesus's first four apostles, who were fishermen, are described as immediately consenting, and abandoning their nets and boats to do so.[164] In John, Jesus's first two apostles were disciples of John the Baptist. The Baptist sees Jesus and calls him the Lamb of God; the two hear this and follow Jesus.[165][166] In addition to the Twelve Apostles, the opening of the passage of the Sermon on the Plain identifies a much larger group of people as disciples.[167] Also, in Luke 10:1–16 Jesus sends 70 or 72 of his followers in pairs to prepare towns for his prospective visit. They are instructed to accept hospitality, heal the sick, and spread the word that the Kingdom of God is coming.[168]
In Mark, the disciples are notably obtuse. They fail to understand Jesus's miracles,[169] his parables,[170] or what "rising from the dead" means.[171] When Jesus is later arrested, they desert him.[153]
In the Synoptics, Jesus teaches extensively, often in parables,[172] about the Kingdom of God (or, in Matthew, the Kingdom of Heaven). The Kingdom is described as both imminent[173] and already present in the ministry of Jesus.[174] Jesus promises inclusion in the Kingdom for those who accept his message.[175] He talks of the "Son of man", an apocalyptic figure who will come to gather the chosen.[28]
Jesus calls people to repent their sins and to devote themselves completely to God.[28] He tells his followers to adhere to Jewish law, although he is perceived by some to have broken the law himself, for example regarding the Sabbath.[28] When asked what the greatest commandment is, Jesus replies: "You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind ... And a second is like it: 'You shall love your neighbor as yourself.'"[176] Other ethical teachings of Jesus include loving your enemies, refraining from hatred and lust, turning the other cheek, and forgiving people who have sinned against you.[177][178]
John's Gospel presents the teachings of Jesus not merely as his own preaching, but as divine revelation. John the Baptist, for example, states in John 3:34: "He whom God has sent speaks the words of God, for he gives the Spirit without measure." In John 7:16 Jesus says, "My teaching is not mine but his who sent me." He asserts the same thing in John 14:10: "Do you not believe that I am in the Father and the Father is in me? The words that I say to you I do not speak on my own; but the Father who dwells in me does his works."[179][180]
Approximately 30 parables form about one-third of Jesus's recorded teachings.[179][181] The parables appear within longer sermons and at other places in the narrative.[182] They often contain symbolism, and usually relate the physical world to the spiritual.[183][184] Common themes in these tales include the kindness and generosity of God and the perils of transgression.[185] Some of his parables, such as the Prodigal Son,[186] are relatively simple, while others, such as the Growing Seed,[187] are sophisticated, profound and abstruse.[188] When asked by his disciples why he speaks in parables to the people, Jesus replies that the chosen disciples have been given to "know the secrets of the kingdom of heaven", unlike the rest of their people, "For the one who has will be given more and he will have in abundance. But the one who does not have will be deprived even more", going on to say that the majority of their generation have grown "dull hearts" and thus are unable to understand.[189]
In the gospel accounts, Jesus devotes a large portion of his ministry to performing miracles, especially healings.[190] The miracles can be classified into two main categories: healing miracles and nature miracles.[191][192][193] The healing miracles include cures for physical ailments, exorcisms,[78][194] and resurrections of the dead.[195][196][197][198] The nature miracles show Jesus's power over nature, and include turning water into wine, walking on water, and calming a storm, among others. Jesus states that his miracles are from a divine source. When his opponents suddenly accuse him of performing exorcisms by the power of Beelzebul, the prince of demons, Jesus counters that he performs them by the "Spirit of God" (Matthew 12:28) or "finger of God", arguing that all logic suggests that Satan would not let his demons assist the Children of God because it would divide Satan's house and bring his kingdom to desolation; furthermore, he asks his opponents that if he exorcises by Beelzebub, "by whom do your sons cast them out?".[199][28][200] In Matthew 12:31–32, he goes on to say that while all manner of sin, "even insults against God" or "insults against the son of man", shall be forgiven, whoever insults goodness (or "The Holy Spirit") shall never be forgiven; they carry the guilt of their sin forever.
In John, Jesus's miracles are described as "signs", performed to prove his mission and divinity.[201][202] In the Synoptics, when asked by some teachers of the Law and some Pharisees to give miraculous signs to prove his authority, Jesus refuses,[201] saying that no sign shall come to corrupt and evil people except the sign of the prophet Jonah. Also, in the Synoptic Gospels, the crowds regularly respond to Jesus's miracles with awe and press on him to heal their sick. In John's Gospel, Jesus is presented as unpressured by the crowds, who often respond to his miracles with trust and faith.[203] One characteristic shared among all miracles of Jesus in the gospel accounts is that he performed them freely and never requested or accepted any form of payment.[204] The gospel episodes that include descriptions of the miracles of Jesus also often include teachings, and the miracles themselves involve an element of teaching.[205][206] Many of the miracles teach the importance of faith. In the cleansing of ten lepers and the raising of Jairus's daughter, for instance, the beneficiaries are told that their healing was due to their faith.[207][208]
At about the middle of each of the three Synoptic Gospels are two significant events: the Confession of Peter and the Transfiguration of Jesus.[158][209][138][139] These two events are not mentioned in the Gospel of John.[210]
In his Confession, Peter tells Jesus, "You are the Messiah, the Son of the living God."[211][212][213] Jesus affirms that Peter's confession is divinely revealed truth.[214][215] After the confession, Jesus tells his disciples about his upcoming death and resurrection.[216]
In the Transfiguration,[217][138][139][158] Jesus takes Peter and two other apostles up an unnamed mountain, where "he was transfigured before them, and his face shone like the sun, and his clothes became dazzling white".[218] A bright cloud appears around them, and a voice from the cloud says, "This is my Son, the Beloved; with him I am well pleased; listen to him."[219][138]
Passion Week
The description of the last week of the life of Jesus (often called Passion Week) occupies about one-third of the narrative in the canonical gospels,[89] starting with Jesus's triumphal entry into Jerusalem and ending with his Crucifixion.[131][162]
In the Synoptics, the last week in Jerusalem is the conclusion of the journey through Perea and Judea that Jesus began in Galilee.[162] Jesus rides a young donkey into Jerusalem, reflecting the tale of the Messiah's Donkey, an oracle from the Book of Zechariah in which the Jews' humble king enters Jerusalem this way.[220][56] People along the way lay cloaks and small branches of trees (known as palm fronds) in front of him and sing part of Psalms 118:25–26.[221][222][223][224]
Jesus next expels the money changers from the Second Temple, accusing them of turning it into a den of thieves through their commercial activities. He then prophesies about the coming destruction, including false prophets, wars, earthquakes, celestial disorders, persecution of the faithful, the appearance of an "abomination of desolation", and unendurable tribulations.[225] The mysterious "Son of Man", he says, will dispatch angels to gather the faithful from all parts of the earth.[226] Jesus warns that these wonders will occur in the lifetimes of the hearers.[227][153] In John, the Cleansing of the Temple occurs at the beginning of Jesus's ministry instead of at the end.[228][85]
The Gospel of John recounts two other feasts in which Jesus taught in Jerusalem before the Passion Week.[231][120] In Bethany, a village near Jerusalem, Jesus raises Lazarus from the dead. This potent sign[85] increases the tension with authorities,[162] who conspire to kill him.[232][120]Mary of Bethany anoints Jesus's feet, foreshadowing his entombment.[233] Jesus then makes his messianic entry into Jerusalem.[120] The cheering crowds greeting Jesus as he enters Jerusalem add to the animosity between him and the establishment.[162] In John, Jesus has already cleansed the Second Temple during an earlier Passover visit to Jerusalem. John next recounts Jesus's Last Supper with his disciples.[120]
The Last Supper is the final meal that Jesus shared with his twelve apostles in Jerusalem before his crucifixion. The Last Supper is mentioned in all four canonical gospels; Paul's First Epistle to the Corinthians[234] also refers to it.[41][42][235] During the meal, Jesus predicts that one of his apostles will betray him.[236] Despite each Apostle's assertion that he would not betray him, Jesus reiterates that the betrayer would be one of those present. Matthew 26:23–25 and John 13:26–27 specifically identify Judas as the traitor.[41][42][236]
In the Synoptics, Jesus takes bread, breaks it, and gives it to the disciples, saying, "This is my body, which is given for you." He then has them all drink from a cup, saying, "This cup that is poured out for you is the new covenant in my blood."[237][41][238] The Christian sacrament or ordinance of the Eucharist is based on these events.[239] Although the Gospel of John does not include a description of the bread-and-wine ritual during the Last Supper, most scholars agree that John 6:22–59 (the Bread of Life Discourse) has a eucharistic character and resonates with the institution narratives in the Synoptic Gospels and in the Pauline writings on the Last Supper.[240]
In all four gospels, Jesus predicts that Peter will deny knowledge of him three times before the rooster crows the next morning.[241][242] In Luke and John, the prediction is made during the Supper.[243] In Matthew and Mark, the prediction is made after the Supper; Jesus also predicts that all his disciples will desert him.[244][245] The Gospel of John provides the only account of Jesus washing his disciples' feet after the meal.[107] John also includes a long sermon by Jesus, preparing his disciples (now without Judas) for his departure. Chapters 14–17 of the Gospel of John are known as the Farewell Discourse and are a significant source of Christological content.[246][247]
In the Synoptics, Jesus and his disciples go to the garden Gethsemane, where Jesus prays to be spared his coming ordeal. Then Judas comes with an armed mob, sent by the chief priests, scribes and elders. He kisses Jesus to identify him to the crowd, which then arrests Jesus. In an attempt to stop them, an unnamed disciple of Jesus uses a sword to cut off the ear of a man in the crowd. After Jesus's arrest, his disciples go into hiding, and Peter, when questioned, thrice denies knowing Jesus. After the third denial, Peter hears the rooster crow and recalls Jesus's prediction about his denial. Peter then weeps bitterly.[245][153][241]
In John 18:1–11, Jesus does not pray to be spared his crucifixion, as the gospel portrays him as scarcely touched by such human weakness.[248] The people who arrest him are Roman soldiers and Temple guards.[249] Instead of being betrayed by a kiss, Jesus proclaims his identity, and when he does, the soldiers and officers fall to the ground. The gospel identifies Peter as the disciple who used the sword, and Jesus rebukes him for it.
After his arrest, Jesus is taken late at night to the private residence of the high priest, Caiaphas, who had been installed by Pilate's predecessor, the Roman procurator Valerius Gratus.[250] The Sanhedrin was a Jewish judicial body.[251] The gospel accounts differ on the details of the trials.[252] In Matthew 26:57, Mark 14:53, and Luke 22:54, Jesus is taken to the house of the high priest, Caiaphas, where he is mocked and beaten that night. Early the next morning, the chief priests and scribes lead Jesus away into their council.[253][254][255] John 18:12–14 states that Jesus is first taken to Annas, Caiaphas's father-in-law, and then to the high priest.[253][254][255]
During the trials Jesus speaks very little, mounts no defence, and gives very infrequent and indirect answers to the priests' questions, prompting an officer to slap him. In Matthew 26:62, Jesus's unresponsiveness leads Caiaphas to ask him, "Have you no answer?".[253][254][255] In Mark 14:61, the high priest then asks Jesus, "Are you the Messiah, the Son of the Blessed One?". Jesus replies, "I am", and then predicts the coming of the Son of Man.[28] This provokes Caiaphas to tear his own robe in anger and to accuse Jesus of blasphemy. In Matthew and Luke, Jesus's answer is more ambiguous:[28][256] in Matthew 26:64, he responds, "You have said so", and in Luke 22:70 he says, "You say that I am."[257][258]
The Jewish elders take Jesus to Pilate's Court and ask the Roman governor, Pontius Pilate, to judge and condemn Jesus for various allegations: subverting the nation, opposing the payment of tribute, claiming to be Christ, a king, and claiming to be the son of God.[259][255] The use of the word "king" is central to the discussion between Jesus and Pilate. In John 18:36, Jesus states, "My kingdom is not from this world", but he does not unequivocally deny being the King of the Jews.[260][261] In Luke 23:7–15, Pilate realizes that Jesus is a Galilean, and thus comes under the jurisdiction of Herod Antipas, the Tetrarch of Galilee and Perea.[262][263] Pilate sends Jesus to Herod to be tried,[264] but Jesus says almost nothing in response to Herod's questions. Herod and his soldiers mock Jesus, put an expensive robe on him to make him look like a king, and return him to Pilate,[262] who then calls together the Jewish elders and announces that he has "not found this man guilty".[264]
Observing a Passover custom of the time, Pilate allows one prisoner chosen by the crowd to be released. He gives the people a choice between Jesus and a murderer called Barabbas (בר-אבא or Bar-abbâ, "son of the father", from the common given name Abba: 'father').[265] Persuaded by the elders,[266] the mob chooses to release Barabbas and crucify Jesus.[267] Pilate writes a sign in Hebrew, Latin, and Greek that reads "Jesus of Nazareth, the King of the Jews" (abbreviated as INRI in depictions) to be affixed to Jesus's cross,[268][269] then scourges Jesus and sends him to be crucified. The soldiers place a crown of thorns on Jesus's head and ridicule him as the King of the Jews. They beat and taunt him before taking him to Calvary,[270] also called Golgotha, for crucifixion.[253][255][271]
Jesus's crucifixion is described in all four canonical gospels. After the trials, Jesus is led to Calvary carrying his cross; the route traditionally thought to have been taken is known as the Via Dolorosa. The three Synoptic Gospels indicate that Simon of Cyrene assists him, having been compelled by the Romans to do so.[272][273] In Luke 23:27–28, Jesus tells the women in the multitude of people following him not to weep for him but for themselves and their children.[272] At Calvary, Jesus is offered a sponge soaked in a concoction usually offered as a painkiller. According to Matthew and Mark, he refuses it.[272][273]
The soldiers then crucify Jesus and cast lots for his clothes. Above Jesus's head on the cross is Pilate's inscription, "Jesus of Nazareth, the King of the Jews." Soldiers and passersby mock him about it. Two convicted thieves are crucified along with Jesus. In Matthew and Mark, both thieves mock Jesus. In Luke, one of them rebukes Jesus, while the other defends him.[272][274][275] Jesus tells the latter: "today you will be with me in Paradise."[276] The four gospels mention the presence of a group of female disciples of Jesus at the crucifixion. In John, Jesus sees his mother Mary and the beloved disciple and tells him to take care of her.[277]
In John 19:33–34, Roman soldiers break the two thieves' legs to hasten their death, but not those of Jesus, as he is already dead. Instead, one soldier pierces Jesus's side with a lance, and blood and water flows out.[274] The Synoptics report a period of darkness, and the heavy curtain in the Temple is torn when Jesus dies. In Matthew 27:51–54, an earthquake breaks open tombs. In Matthew and Mark, terrified by the events, a Roman centurion states that Jesus was the Son of God.[272][278]
On the same day, Joseph of Arimathea, with Pilate's permission and with Nicodemus's help, removes Jesus's body from the cross, wraps him in a clean cloth, and buries him in his new rock-hewn tomb.[272] In Matthew 27:62–66, on the following day the chief Jewish priests ask Pilate for the tomb to be secured, and with Pilate's permission the priests place seals on the large stone covering the entrance.[272][279]
The Gospels do not describe the moment of the resurrection of Jesus. They describe the discovery of his empty tomb and several appearances of Jesus, with distinct differences in each narrative.[280]
In the four Gospels, Mary Magdalene goes to the tomb on Sunday morning, alone or with one or several other women.[281] The tomb is empty, with the stone rolled away, and there are one or two angels, depending on the accounts. In the Synoptics, the women are told that Jesus is not here and that he is risen.[282] In Mark and Matthew, the angel also instructs them to tell the disciples to meet Jesus in Galilee.[283] In Luke, Peter visits the tomb after he is told it is empty.[284] In John, he goes there with the beloved disciple.[285] Matthew mentions Roman guards at the tomb,[286] who report to the priests of Jerusalem what happened. The priests bribe them to say that the disciples stole Jesus's body during the night.[287]
The four Gospels then describe various appearances of Jesus in his resurrected body. Jesus first reveals himself to Mary Magdalene in Mark 16:9 and John 20:14–17,[288] along with "the other Mary" in Matthew 28:9,[289] while in Luke the first reported appearance is to two disciples heading to Emmaus.[290] Jesus then reveals himself to the eleven disciples, in Jerusalem or in Galilee.[291] In Luke 24:36–43, he eats and shows them his tangible wounds to prove that he is not a spirit.[292] He also shows them to Thomas to end his doubts, in John 20:24–29.[293] In the Synoptics, Jesus commissions the disciples to spread the gospel message to all nations,[107][294] while in John 21, he tells Peter to take care of his sheep.[48][295]
Jesus's ascension into Heaven is described in Luke 24:50–53, Acts 1:1–11, and mentioned in 1 Timothy 3:16. In the Acts of the Apostles, forty days after the Resurrection, as the disciples look on, "he was lifted up, and a cloud took him out of their sight". 1 Peter 3:22 states that Jesus has "gone into heaven and is at the right hand of God".[48]
The Acts of the Apostles describes several appearances of Jesus after his Ascension. In Acts 7:55, Stephen gazes into heaven and sees "Jesus standing at the right hand of God" just before his death.[296] On the road to Damascus, the Apostle Paul is converted to Christianity after seeing a blinding light and hearing a voice saying, "I am Jesus, whom you are persecuting."[297] In Acts 9:10–18, Jesus instructs Ananias of Damascus in a vision to heal Paul.[298] The Book of Revelation includes a revelation from Jesus concerning the last days of Earth.[299]
Numerous quotations in the New Testament and other Christian writings of the first centuries indicate that early Christians generally used and revered the Hebrew Bible (the Tanakh) as religious text, mostly in the Greek (Septuagint) or Aramaic (Targum) translations.[306]
Early Christians wrote many religious works, including the ones included in the canon of the New Testament. The canonical texts, which have become the main sources used by historians to try to understand the historical Jesus and sacred texts within Christianity, were probably written between 50 and 120 AD.[307]
Prior to the Enlightenment, the Gospels were usually regarded as accurate historical accounts, but since then scholars have emerged who question the reliability of the Gospels and draw a distinction between the Jesus described in the Gospels and the Jesus of history.[308] Since the 18th century, three separate scholarly quests for the historical Jesus have taken place, each with distinct characteristics and based on different research criteria, which were often developed during the quest that applied them.[78][309] While there is widespread scholarly agreement on the existence of Jesus,[f] and a basic consensus on the general outline of his life,[p] the portraits of Jesus constructed by various scholars often differ from each other, and from the image portrayed in the gospel accounts.[311][312]
Approaches to the historical reconstruction of the life of Jesus have varied from the "maximalist" approaches of the 19th century, in which the gospel accounts were accepted as reliable evidence wherever it is possible, to the "minimalist" approaches of the early 20th century, where hardly anything about Jesus was accepted as historical.[313] In the 1950s, as the second quest for the historical Jesus gathered pace, the minimalist approaches faded away, and in the 21st century, minimalists such as Price are a small minority.[314][315] Although a belief in the inerrancy of the Gospels cannot be supported historically, many scholars since the 1980s have held that, beyond the few facts considered to be historically certain, certain other elements of Jesus's life are "historically probable".[314][316][317] Modern scholarly research on the historical Jesus thus focuses on identifying the most probable elements.[318][319]
Judea and Galilee in the 1st century
Judea, Galilee and neighbouring areas at the time of Jesus
In AD 6, Judea, Idumea, and Samaria were transformed from a Herodian client kingdom of the Roman Empire into an imperial province, also called Judea. A Roman prefect, rather than a client king, ruled the land. The prefect ruled from Caesarea Maritima, leaving Jerusalem to be run by the High Priest of Israel. As an exception, the prefect came to Jerusalem during religious festivals, when religious and patriotic enthusiasm sometimes inspired unrest or uprisings. Gentile lands surrounded the Jewish territories of Judea and Galilee, but Roman law and practice allowed Jews to remain separate legally and culturally. Galilee was evidently prosperous, and poverty was limited enough that it did not threaten the social order.[28]
Jews based their faith and religious practice on the Torah, five books said to have been given by God to Moses. The three prominent religious parties were the Pharisees, the Essenes, and the Sadducees. Together these parties represented only a small fraction of the population. Most Jews looked forward to a time when God would deliver them from their pagan rulers, possibly through war against the Romans.[28]
A 1640 edition of the works of Josephus, a 1st-century Roman-Jewish historian who referred to Jesus[321]
New Testament scholars face a formidable challenge when they analyse the canonical Gospels.[322] The Gospels are not biographies in the modern sense, and the authors explain Jesus's theological significance and recount his public ministry while omitting many details of his life.[322]
The reports of supernatural events associated with Jesus's death and resurrection make the challenge even more difficult.[322] Scholars regard the Gospels as compromised sources of information because the writers were trying to glorify Jesus.[68] Ed Sanders states that the sources for Jesus's life are better than sources scholars have for the life of Alexander the Great.[68]
Scholars use a number of criteria, such as the criterion of independent attestation, the criterion of coherence, and the criterion of discontinuity to judge the historicity of events.[323] The historicity of an event also depends on the reliability of the source; indeed, the Gospels are not independent nor consistent records of Jesus's life. Mark, which is most likely the earliest written gospel, has been considered for many decades the most historically accurate.[324] John, the latest written gospel, differs considerably from the Synoptic Gospels, and thus is generally considered less reliable, although more and more scholars now also recognize that it may contain a core of older material as historically valuable as the Synoptic tradition or even more so.[325]
Some scholars (most notably the Jesus Seminar) believe that the non-canonical Gospel of Thomas might be an independent witness to many of Jesus's parables and aphorisms. For example, Thomas confirms that Jesus blessed the poor and that this saying circulated independently before being combined with similar sayings in the Q source.[326] However, the majority of scholars are sceptical about this text and believe it should be dated to the 2nd century AD.[327][328]
Other select non-canonical Christian texts may also have value for historical Jesus research.[72]
Early non-Christian sources that attest to the historical existence of Jesus include the works of the historians Josephus and Tacitus.[q][321][330] Josephus scholar Louis Feldman has stated that "few have doubted the genuineness" of Josephus's reference to Jesus in book 20 of the Antiquities of the Jews, and it is disputed only by a small number of scholars.[331][332] Tacitus referred to Christ and his execution by Pilate in book 15 of his work Annals. Scholars generally consider Tacitus's reference to the execution of Jesus to be both authentic and of historical value as an independent Roman source.[333]
Non-Christian sources are valuable in two ways. First, they show that even neutral or hostile parties never show any doubt that Jesus actually existed. Second, they present a rough picture of Jesus that is compatible with that found in the Christian sources: that Jesus was a teacher, had a reputation as a miracle worker, had a brother James, and died a violent death.[334]
Archaeology helps scholars better understand Jesus's social world.[335] Recent archaeological work, for example, indicates that Capernaum, a city important in Jesus's ministry, was poor and small, without even a forum or an agora.[336][337] This archaeological discovery resonates well with the scholarly view that Jesus advocated reciprocal sharing among the destitute in that area of Galilee.[336]
Jesus was a Galilean Jew,[10] born around the beginning of the 1st century, who died in 30 or 33 AD in Judea.[338] The general scholarly consensus is that Jesus was a contemporary of John the Baptist and was crucified as ordered by the Roman governor Pontius Pilate,[192] who held office from 26 to 36 AD.[192]
The Gospels offer several indications concerning the year of Jesus's birth. Matthew 2:1 associates the birth of Jesus with the reign of Herod the Great, who died around 4 BC, and Luke 1:5 mentions that Herod was on the throne shortly before the birth of Jesus,[339][340] although this gospel also associates the birth with the Census of Quirinius which took place ten years later.[341][342] Luke 3:23 states that Jesus was "about thirty years old" at the start of his ministry, which according to Acts 10:37–38 was preceded by John the Baptist's ministry, which was recorded in Luke 3:1–2 to have begun in the 15th year of Tiberius's reign (28 or 29 AD).[340][343] By collating the gospel accounts with historical data and using various other methods, most scholars arrive at a date of birth for Jesus between 6 and 4 BC,[343][344] but some propose estimates that include a wider range.[r]
The date range for Jesus's ministry has been estimated using several different approaches.[345][346] One of these applies the reference in Luke 3:1–2, Acts 10:37–38, and the dates of Tiberius's reign, which are well known, to give a date of around 28–29 AD for the start of Jesus's ministry.[347] Another approach estimates a date around 27–29 AD by using the statement about the temple in John 2:13–20, which asserts that the temple in Jerusalem was in its 46th year of construction at the start of Jesus's ministry, together with Josephus's statement[348] that the temple's reconstruction was started by Herod the Great in the 18th year of his reign.[345][349] A further method uses the date of the death of John the Baptist and the marriage of Herod Antipas to Herodias, based on the writings of Josephus, and correlates it with Matthew 14:4 and Mark 6:18.[350][351] Given that most scholars date the marriage of Herod and Herodias as AD 28–35, this yields a date about 28–29 AD.[346]
A number of approaches have been used to estimate the year of the crucifixion of Jesus. Most scholars agree that he died in 30 or 33 AD.[338][352] The Gospels state that the event occurred during the prefecture of Pilate, the Roman governor of Judea from 26 to 36 AD.[353][354][355] The date for the conversion of Paul (estimated to be 33–36 AD) acts as an upper bound for the date of Crucifixion. The dates for Paul's conversion and ministry can be determined by analysing the Pauline epistles and the Acts of the Apostles.[356][357] Astronomers have tried to estimate the precise date of the Crucifixion by analysing lunar motion and calculating historic dates of Passover, a festival based on the lunisolar Hebrew calendar. The most widely accepted dates derived from this method are 7 April 30 AD, and 3 April 33 AD (both Julian).[358]
Roman senator and historian Tacitus (pictured left) mentioned the execution of "Christus" ('Jesus') by Pilate in a passage describing the Great Fire of Rome and Nero's persecution of Christians in the Annals, a history of the Roman Empire during the 1st century.
Nearly all historians (both modern and historical) agree that Jesus was a real person who historically existed.[f] Scholars have reached a limited consensus on the basics of Jesus's life.[359]
Many scholars agree that Joseph, Jesus's father, died before Jesus began his ministry. Joseph is not mentioned in the Gospels during Jesus's ministry. Joseph's death would explain why in Mark 6:3, Jesus's neighbours refer to Jesus as the "son of Mary" (sons were usually identified by their fathers).[360]
According to Theissen and Merz, it is common for extraordinary charismatic leaders, such as Jesus, to come into conflict with their ordinary families.[361] In Mark, Jesus's family comes to get him, fearing that he is mad (Mark 3:20–34), and this account is thought to be historical because early Christians would probably not have invented it.[362] After Jesus's death, many members of his family joined the Christian movement.[361] Jesus's brother James became a leader of the Jerusalem Church.[363]
Géza Vermes says that the doctrine of the virgin birth of Jesus arose from theological development rather than from historical events.[364]
Despite the widely held view that the authors of the Synoptic Gospels drew upon each other (the so-called synoptic problem), other scholars take it as significant that the virgin birth is attested by two separate gospels, Matthew and Luke.[365][366][367][368][369][370]
According to E. P. Sanders, the birth narratives in the Gospel of Matthew and the Gospel of Luke are the clearest cases of invention in the Gospel narratives of Jesus's life. Marcus Borg concurs, explaining that, "I (and most mainline scholars) do not see these stories as historically factual."[371] Both accounts have Jesus born in Bethlehem, in accordance with Jewish salvation history, and both have him growing up in Nazareth. But Sanders points out that the two Gospels report completely different and irreconcilable explanations for how that happened. Luke's account of a census in which everyone returned to their ancestral cities is not plausible. Matthew's account is more plausible, but the story reads as though it was invented to identify Jesus as a new Moses, and the historian Josephus reports Herod the Great's brutality without ever mentioning that he massacred little boys.[372] The contradictions between the two Gospels were probably apparent to the early Christians already, since attempts to harmonize the two narratives are already present in the earlier apocryphal infancy gospels (the Infancy Gospel of Thomas and the Gospel of James), which are dated to the 2nd century AD.[373][374]
Conservative scholars argue that despite the uncertainty of the details, the gospel birth narratives trace back to historical, or at least much earlier pre-gospel traditions.[375][376][377][378] For instance, according to Ben Witherington:
What we find in Matthew and Luke is not the story of… a [god] descending to earth and, in the guise of a man, mating with a human woman, but rather the story of a miraculous conception without the aid of any man, divine or otherwise. As such, this story is without precedent either in Jewish or pagan literature.[379]
Sanders says that the genealogies of Jesus are based not on historical information but on the author's desire to show that Jesus was the universal Jewish saviour.[92] In any event, once the doctrine of the virgin birth of Jesus became established, that tradition superseded the earlier tradition that he was descended from David through Joseph.[380] The Gospel of Luke reports that Jesus was a blood relative of John the Baptist, but scholars generally consider this connection to be invented.[92][381]
Baptism
Baptism in the Jordan River, the river where Jesus was baptized
Most modern scholars consider Jesus's baptism to be a definite historical fact, along with his crucifixion.[6] Theologian James D. G. Dunn states that they "command almost universal assent" and "rank so high on the 'almost impossible to doubt or deny' scale of historical facts" that they are often the starting points for the study of the historical Jesus.[6] Scholars adduce the criterion of embarrassment, saying that early Christians would not have invented a baptism that might imply that Jesus committed sins and wanted to repent.[382][383] According to Theissen and Merz, Jesus was inspired by John the Baptist and took over from him many elements of his teaching.[384]
Ministry in Galilee
Most scholars hold that Jesus lived in Galilee and Judea and did not preach or study elsewhere.[385] They agree that Jesus debated with Jewish authorities on the subject of God, performed some healings, taught in parables and gathered followers.[192] Jesus's Jewish critics considered his ministry to be scandalous because he feasted with sinners, fraternized with women, and allowed his followers to pluck grain on the Sabbath.[55] According to Sanders, it is not plausible that disagreements over how to interpret the Law of Moses and the Sabbath would have led Jewish authorities to want Jesus killed.[386]
According to Ehrman, Jesus taught that a coming kingdom was everyone's proper focus, not anything in this life.[387] He taught about the Jewish Law, seeking its true meaning, sometimes in opposition to traditions.[388] Jesus put love at the center of the Law, and following that Law was an apocalyptic necessity.[388] His ethical teachings called for forgiveness, not judging others, loving enemies, and caring for the poor.[389] Funk and Hoover note that typical of Jesus were paradoxical or surprising turns of phrase, such as advising one, when struck on the cheek, to offer the other cheek to be struck as well.[390][391]
The Gospels portray Jesus teaching in well-defined sessions, such as the Sermon on the Mount in the Gospel of Matthew or the parallel Sermon on the Plain in Luke. According to Gerd Theissen and Annette Merz, these teaching sessions include authentic teachings of Jesus, but the scenes were invented by the respective evangelists to frame these teachings, which had originally been recorded without context.[72] While Jesus's miracles fit within the social context of antiquity, he defined them differently. First, he attributed them to the faith of those healed. Second, he connected them to end times prophecy.[392]
Jesus chose twelve disciples (the "Twelve"),[393] evidently as an apocalyptic message.[394] All three Synoptics mention the Twelve, although the names on Luke's list vary from those in Mark and Matthew, suggesting that Christians were not certain who all the disciples were.[394] The twelve disciples might have represented the twelve original tribes of Israel, which would be restored once God's rule was instituted.[394] The disciples were reportedly meant to be the rulers of the tribes in the coming Kingdom.[395][394] According to Bart Ehrman, Jesus's promise that the Twelve would rule is historical, because the Twelve included Judas Iscariot. In Ehrman's view, no Christians would have invented a line from Jesus, promising rulership to the disciple who betrayed him.[394]
In Mark, the disciples play hardly any role other than a negative one. While others sometimes respond to Jesus with complete faith, his disciples are puzzled and doubtful.[396] They serve as a foil to Jesus and to other characters.[396] The failings of the disciples are probably exaggerated in Mark, and the disciples make a better showing in Matthew and Luke.[396]
Sanders says that Jesus's mission was not about repentance, although he acknowledges that this opinion is unpopular. He argues that repentance appears as a strong theme only in Luke, that repentance was John the Baptist's message, and that Jesus's ministry would not have been scandalous if the sinners he ate with had been repentant.[397] According to Theissen and Merz, Jesus taught that God was generously giving people an opportunity to repent.[398]
Role
Jesus taught that an apocalyptic figure, the "Son of Man", would soon come on clouds of glory to gather the elect or chosen ones.[399] He referred to himself as a "son of man" in the colloquial sense of "a person", but scholars do not know whether he also meant himself when he referred to the heavenly "Son of Man". Paul the Apostle and other early Christians interpreted the "Son of Man" as the risen Jesus.[28]
The Gospels refer to Jesus not only as a messiah but in the absolute form as "the Messiah" or, equivalently, "the Christ". In early Judaism, this absolute form of the title is not found, but only phrases such as "his messiah". The tradition is ambiguous enough to leave room for debate as to whether Jesus defined his eschatological role as that of the Messiah.[400] The Jewish messianic tradition included many different forms, some of them focused on a messiah figure and others not.[401] Based on the Christian tradition, Gerd Theissen advances the hypothesis that Jesus saw himself in messianic terms but did not claim the title "Messiah".[401] Bart Ehrman argues that Jesus did consider himself to be the Messiah, albeit in the sense that he would be the king of the new political order that God would usher in,[402] not in the sense that most people today think of the term.[403]
Passover and crucifixion in Jerusalem
Around AD 30, Jesus and his followers travelled from Galilee to Jerusalem to observe Passover.[393] Jesus caused a disturbance in the Second Temple,[24] which was the center of Jewish religious and civil authority. Sanders associates it with Jesus's prophecy that the Temple would be totally demolished.[404] Jesus held a last meal with his disciples, which is the origin of the Sacrament of the Holy Eucharist. His words as recorded in the Synoptic gospels and Paul's First Letter to the Corinthians do not entirely agree, but this meal appears to have pointed to Jesus's place in the coming Kingdom of God when very probably Jesus knew he was about to be killed, although he may have still hoped that God might yet intervene.[405]
The Gospels say that Jesus was betrayed to the authorities by a disciple, and many scholars consider this report to be highly reliable.[148] He was executed on the orders of Pontius Pilate, the Roman prefect of Judaea.[24] Pilate most likely saw Jesus's reference to the Kingdom of God as a threat to Roman authority and worked with the Temple elites to have Jesus executed.[406] The Sadducean high-priestly leaders of the Temple more plausibly had Jesus executed for political reasons than for his teaching.[148] They may have regarded him as a threat to stability, especially after he caused a disturbance at the Second Temple.[148][407] Other factors, such as Jesus's triumphal entry into Jerusalem, may have contributed to this decision.[408] Most scholars consider Jesus's crucifixion to be factual because early Christians would not have invented the painful death of their leader.[6][409]
After crucifixion
The Resurrection of Christ from a 16th-century manuscript of La Passion de Nostre Seigneur
After Jesus's death, his followers said he was restored to life, although the exact details of their experiences are unclear. The gospel reports contradict each other, possibly suggesting competition among those claiming to have seen him first rather than deliberate fraud.[410] On the other hand, L. Michael White suggests that inconsistencies in the Gospels reflect differences in the agendas of their unknown authors.[359] The followers of Jesus formed a community to wait for his return and the founding of his kingdom.[24]
Modern research on the historical Jesus has not led to a unified picture of the historical figure, partly because of the variety of academic traditions represented by the scholars.[411] Given the scarcity of historical sources, it is generally difficult for any scholar to construct a portrait of Jesus that can be considered historically valid beyond the basic elements of his life.[69][70] The portraits of Jesus constructed in these quests often differ from each other, and from the image portrayed in the Gospels.[311][412]
Jesus is seen as the founder of, in the words of Sanders, a "renewal movement within Judaism". One of the criteria used to discern historical details in the "third quest" is the criterion of plausibility, relative to Jesus's Jewish context and to his influence on Christianity. A disagreement in contemporary research is whether Jesus was apocalyptic. Most scholars conclude that he was an apocalyptic preacher, such as John the Baptist and Paul the Apostle. In contrast, certain prominent North American scholars, such as Burton Mack and John Dominic Crossan, advocate for a non-eschatological Jesus, one who is more of a Cynic sage than an apocalyptic preacher.[413] In addition to portraying Jesus as an apocalyptic prophet, a charismatic healer or a cynic philosopher, some scholars portray him as the true messiah or an egalitarian prophet of social change.[414][415] However, the attributes described in the portraits sometimes overlap, and scholars who differ on some attributes sometimes agree on others.[416]
Since the 18th century, scholars have occasionally put forth that Jesus was a political national messiah, but the evidence for this portrait is negligible. Likewise, the proposal that Jesus was a Zealot does not fit with the earliest strata of the Synoptic tradition.[148]
The ethnicity of Jesus in art has been influenced by cultural settings.[417][418]
Jesus grew up in Galilee and much of his ministry took place there.[419] The languages spoken in Galilee and Judea during the 1st century AD include Jewish Palestinian Aramaic, Hebrew, and Greek, with Aramaic being predominant.[420][421] There is substantial consensus that Jesus gave most of his teachings in Aramaic[422] in the Galilean dialect.[423][424] Other than Aramaic and Hebrew, it is likely that he was also able to speak in Koine Greek.[425][426][427]
Modern scholars agree that Jesus was a Jew of 1st-century Judea.[428]Ioudaios in New Testament Greek[s] is a term which in the contemporary context may refer to religion (Second Temple Judaism), ethnicity (of Judea), or both.[431][432][433] In a review of the state of modern scholarship, Amy-Jill Levine writes that the entire question of ethnicity is "fraught with difficulty", and that "beyond recognizing that 'Jesus was Jewish', rarely does the scholarship address what being 'Jewish' means".[434]
The New Testament gives no description of the physical appearance of Jesus before his death—it is generally indifferent to racial appearances and does not refer to the features of the people it mentions.[435][436][437] Jesus probably looked like a typical Jewish man of his time and place; standing around 166 cm (5 ft 5 in) tall with a thin but fit build, olive-brown skin, brown eyes and short, dark hair. He also probably had a beard that was not particularly long or heavy.[438] His clothing may have suggested poverty, consisting of a mantle (shawl) with tassels, a knee-length basic tunic, and sandals.[439]
The Christ myth theory is the hypothesis that Jesus of Nazareth never existed; or if he did, that he had virtually nothing to do with the founding of Christianity and the accounts in the gospels.[t] Stories of Jesus's birth, along with other key events, have so many mythic elements that some scholars have suggested that Jesus himself was a myth.[441]
Bruno Bauer (1809–1882) taught that the first Gospel was a work of literature that produced history rather than described it.[442] According to Albert Kalthoff (1850–1906), a social movement produced Jesus when it encountered Jewish messianic expectations.[442]Arthur Drews (1865–1935) saw Jesus as the concrete form of a myth that predated Christianity.[442]
Despite arguments put forward by authors who have questioned the existence of a historical Jesus, virtually all scholars of antiquity accept that Jesus was a historical figure and consider Christ's myth theory fringe.[443][444][445][446][447][448][449]
Jesus's teachings and the retelling of his life story have significantly influenced the course of human history, and have directly or indirectly affected the lives of billions of people, even non-Christians, worldwide.[450][451] He is considered by many people to be the most influential figure to have ever lived, finding a significant place in numerous cultural contexts.[452][453]
Jesus is the central figure of Christianity.[82] Although Christian views of Jesus vary, it is possible to summarize the key beliefs shared among major denominations, as stated in their catechetical or confessional texts.[461][462][463] Christian views of Jesus are derived from the texts of the New Testament, including the canonical gospels and letters such as the Pauline epistles and the Johannine writings. These documents outline the key beliefs held by Christians about Jesus, including his divinity, humanity, and earthly life, and that he is the Christ and the Son of God.[464] Despite their many shared beliefs, not all Christian denominations agree on all doctrines, and both major and minor differences on teachings and beliefs have persisted throughout Christianity for centuries.[465]
Judaism rejects the idea of Jesus (or any future Jewish messiah) being God,[407] or a mediator to God, or part of a Trinity.[478] It holds that Jesus is not the messiah, arguing that he neither fulfilled the messianic prophecies in the Tanakh nor embodied the personal qualifications of the Messiah.[479] Jews argue that Jesus did not fulfill prophecies to build the Third Temple,[480] gather Jews back to Israel,[481] bring world peace,[482] and unite humanity under the God of Israel.[483][484] Furthermore, according to Jewish tradition, there were no prophets after Malachi,[485] who delivered his prophecies in the 5th century BC.[486]
Judaic criticism of Jesus is long-standing, and includes a range of stories in the Talmud, written and compiled from the 3rd to the 5th century AD.[487] In one such story, Yeshu HaNozri ('Jesus the Nazarene'), a lewd apostate, is executed by the Jewish high court for spreading idolatry and practising magic.[488] According to some, the form Yeshu is an acronym which in Hebrew reads "may his name and memory be blotted out".[489] The majority of contemporary scholars consider that this material provides no information on the historical Jesus.[490] The Mishneh Torah, a late 12th-century work of Jewish law written by Moses Maimonides, states that Jesus is a "stumbling block" who makes "the majority of the world to err and serve a god other than the Lord".[491]
Medieval Hebrew literature contains the anecdotal "Episode of Jesus" (known also as Toledot Yeshu), in which Jesus is described as being the son of Joseph, the son of Pandera (see: Episode of Jesus). The account portrays Jesus as an impostor.[492]
Manichaeism, an ancient religious movement, became one of the earliest organized religions outside of Christianity to honor Jesus as a significant figure.[493][494][495] Within the Manichaean belief system, Jesus is revered alongside other prominent prophets such as Zoroaster, Gautama Buddha, and Mani himself.[496][497]
A major figure in Islam,[498][499][500] Jesus (often referred to by his Quranic name ʿĪsā) is considered to be a messenger of God and the messiah (al-Masīḥ) who was sent to guide the Children of Israel (Banī Isrāʾīl) with a new scripture, the Gospel (referred to in Islam as Injīl).[500][501] Muslims regard the gospels' accounts in the New Testament as partially authentic, and believe that Jesus's original message was altered (taḥrīf) and that Muhammad came later to revive it.[502] Belief in Jesus (and all other messengers of God) is a requirement for being a Muslim.[503] The Quran mentions Jesus by name 25 times—more often than Muhammad[504][505]—and emphasizes that Jesus was a mortal human who, like all other prophets, had been divinely chosen to spread God's message.[506] While the Quran affirms the Virgin birth of Jesus, he is considered to be neither an incarnation nor a son of God.[507][508][509] Islamic texts emphasize a strict notion of monotheism (tawḥīd) and forbid the association of partners with God, which would be idolatry.[510]
The Quran describes the annunciation to Mary (Maryam) by the Holy Spirit that she is to give birth to Jesus while remaining a virgin. It calls the virgin birth a miracle that occurred by the will of God.[511][512] The Quran (21:91 and 66:12) states that God breathed his spirit into Mary while she was chaste.[511][512] Jesus is called a "spirit from God" because he was born through the action of the Spirit,[511] but that belief does not imply his pre-existence.[513]
To aid in his ministry to the Jewish people, Jesus was given the ability to perform miracles, by permission of God rather than by his own power.[509] Through his ministry, Jesus is seen as a precursor to Muhammad.[506] In the Quran (4:157–159) it is said that Jesus was not killed but was merely made to appear that way to unbelievers,[514] and that he was raised into the heavens while still alive by God.[515] According to most classic Sunni and Twelver Shi'ite interpretations of these verses, the likeness of Jesus was cast upon a substitute (most often one of the apostles), who was crucified in Jesus's stead.[516] However, some medieval Muslims (among others, the ghulāt writing under the name of al-Mufaddal ibn Umar al-Ju'fi, the Brethren of Purity, various Isma'ili philosophers, and the Sunni mystic al-Ghazali) affirmed the historicity of Jesus's crucifixion. These thinkers held the docetic view that, although Jesus's human form (his body) had died on the cross, his true divine nature (his spirit) had survived and ascended into heaven, so that his death was only an appearance.[517] Nevertheless, to Muslims it is the ascension rather than the crucifixion that constitutes a major event in the life of Jesus.[518] There is no mention of his resurrection on the third day, and his death plays no special role in Islamic theories of salvation.[519] However, Jesus is a central figure in Islamic eschatology: Muslims believe that he will return to Earth at the end of time and defeat the Antichrist (ad-Dajjal) by killing him.[500][520][521][522]
According to the Quran, the coming of Muhammad (also called "Ahmad") was predicted by Jesus:
And ˹remember˺ when Jesus, son of Mary, said, "O children of Israel! I am truly Allah's messenger to you, confirming the Torah which came before me, and giving good news of a messenger after me whose name will be Aḥmad." Yet when the Prophet came to them with clear proofs, they said, "This is pure magic."
Through this verse, early Arab Muslims claimed legitimacy for their new faith in the existing religious traditions and the alleged predictions of Jesus.[523]
The Ahmadiyya Muslim Community has several distinct teachings about Jesus.[524] Ahmadis believe that he was a mortal man who survived his crucifixion and died a natural death at the age of 120 in Kashmir, India, and is buried at Roza Bal.[525]
In the Druze faith,[457] Jesus is considered and revered as one of the seven spokesmen or prophets (natiq), defined as messengers or intermediaries between God and mankind, along with figures including Moses, Muhammad and Muhammad ibn Isma'il, each of them sent at a different period of history to preach the message of God.[457][526][527][528][529] In Druze tradition, Jesus is known under three titles: the True Messiah (al-Masih al-Haq), the Messiah of all Nations (Masih al-Umam), and the Messiah of Sinners. This is due, respectively, to the belief that Jesus delivered the true Gospel message, the belief that he was the Saviour of all nations, and the belief that he offers forgiveness.[530]
Baháʼí Faith
In the Baháʼí Faith, Jesus is considered one of the Manifestations of God,[531] defined as divine messengers or prophets sent by God to guide humanity, along with other religious figures such as Moses, Krishna, Zoroaster, Buddha, Muhammad, and Baháʼu'lláh. Baháʼís believe that these religious founders or leaders have contributed to the progressive revelation by bringing spiritual and moral values to humanity in their own time and place.[532][533][534][535][536] As a Manifestation of God, Jesus is believed to reflect God's qualities and attributes, but is not considered the only saviour of humanity nor the incarnation of God.[537][538][539] Baháʼís believe in the virgin birth,[540][541] but see the resurrection and the miracles of Jesus as symbolic.[542][541]
Jesus depicted as the liberator of Black slaves, on the masthead of the abolitionist paper The LiberatorEnthroned Jesus image on a Manichaean temple banner from c. 10th-centuryQocho
In Christian Gnosticism (now a largely extinct religious movement),[543] Jesus was sent from the divine realm and provided the secret knowledge (gnosis) necessary for salvation. Most Gnostics believed that Jesus was a human who became possessed by the spirit of "the Christ" at his baptism. This spirit left Jesus's body during the crucifixion but was rejoined to him when he was raised from the dead. Some Gnostics, however, were docetics, believing that Jesus did not have a physical body, but only appeared to possess one.[544]
Jesus healing a paralytic in one of the first known images of Jesus from Dura Europos in the 3rd century[556]
Some of the earliest depictions of Jesus at the Dura-Europos church are firmly dated to before 256.[557] Thereafter, despite the lack of biblical references or historical records, a wide range of depictions of Jesus appeared during the last two millennia, often influenced by cultural settings, political circumstances and theological contexts.[417][418][436] As in other Early Christian art, the earliest depictions date to the late 2nd or early 3rd century, and surviving images are found especially in the Catacombs of Rome.[558]
The depiction of Christ in pictorial form was highly controversial in the early Church.[559][v][560] From the 5th century onward, flat painted icons became popular in the Eastern Church.[561] The Byzantine Iconoclasm acted as a barrier to developments in the East, but by the 9th century, art was permitted again.[417] The Protestant Reformation brought renewed resistance to imagery, but total prohibition was atypical, and Protestant objections to images have tended to reduce since the 16th century. Although large images are generally avoided, few Protestants now object to book illustrations depicting Jesus.[562][563] The use of depictions of Jesus is advocated by the leaders of denominations such as Anglicans and Catholics[564][565][566] and is a key element of the Eastern Orthodox tradition.[567][568]
In Eastern Christian art, the Transfiguration was a major theme, and every Eastern Orthodox monk who had trained in icon painting had to prove his craft by painting an icon depicting it.[569] Icons receive the external marks of veneration, such as kisses and prostration, and they are thought to be powerful channels of divine grace.[561]
In Western Europe, the Renaissance brought forth a number of artists who focused on depictions of Jesus; Fra Angelico and others followed Giotto in the systematic development of uncluttered images.[417] Before the Protestant Reformation, the crucifix was common in Western Christianity. It is a model of the cross with Jesus crucified on it. The crucifix became the central ornament of the altar in the 13th century, a use that has been nearly universal in Roman Catholic churches since then.[570]
The Shroud of Turin, Italy, is the best-known claimed relic of Jesus and one of the most studied artefacts in human history.[571]
The total destruction that ensued with the siege of Jerusalem by the Romans in AD 70 made the survival of items from 1st-century Judea very rare and almost no direct records survive about the history of Judaism from the last part of the 1st century through the 2nd century.[572][573][w]Margaret M. Mitchell writes that although Eusebius reports (Ecclesiastical History III 5.3) that the early Christians left Jerusalem for Pella just before Jerusalem was subjected to the final lockdown, we must accept that no first-hand Christian items from the early Jerusalem Church have reached us.[575]Joe Nickell writes, "as investigation after investigation has shown, not a single, reliably authenticated relic of Jesus exists."[576][x]
However, throughout the history of Christianity, a number of relics attributed to Jesus have been claimed, although doubt has been cast on them. The 16th-century Catholic theologian Erasmus wrote sarcastically about the proliferation of relics and the number of buildings that could have been constructed from the wood claimed to be from the cross used in the Crucifixion.[579] Similarly, while experts debate whether Jesus was crucified with three nails or with four, at least thirty holy nails continue to be venerated as relics across Europe.[580]
^John P. Meier writes that Jesus's birth year is c. 7 or 6 BC.[1]Karl Rahner states that the consensus among Christian scholars is c. 4 BC.[2]E. P. Sanders also favours c. 4 BC and refers to the general consensus.[3]Jack Finegan uses the study of early Christian traditions to support c. 3 or 2 BC.[4]
^James Dunn writes that the baptism and crucifixion of Jesus "command almost universal assent" and "rank so high on the 'almost impossible to doubt or deny' scale of historical facts" that they are often the starting points for the study of the historical Jesus.[6]Bart Ehrman states that the crucifixion of Jesus on the orders of Pontius Pilate is the most certain element about him.[7]John Dominic Crossan and Richard G. Watts state that the crucifixion of Jesus is as certain as any historical fact can be.[8] Paul R. Eddy and Gregory A. Boyd say that non-Christian confirmation of the crucifixion of Jesus is now "firmly established".[9]
^Traditionally, Christians believe that Mary conceived her son miraculously by the agency of the Holy Spirit. Muslims believe that she conceived her son miraculously by the command of God. Joseph was from these perspectives and according to the canonical gospels the acting adoptive father of Jesus.
^ abcIn a 2011 review of the state of modern scholarship, Bart Ehrman wrote, "He certainly existed, as virtually every competent scholar of antiquity, Christian or non-Christian, agrees."[11]Richard A. Burridge states: "There are those who argue that Jesus is a figment of the Church's imagination, that there never was a Jesus at all. I have to say that I do not know any respectable critical scholar who says that any more."[12]Robert M. Price does not believe that Jesus existed but agrees that this perspective runs against the views of the majority of scholars.[13]James D. G. Dunn calls the theories of Jesus's non-existence "a thoroughly dead thesis".[14]Michael Grant (a classicist) wrote in 1977, "In recent years, 'no serious scholar has ventured to postulate the non historicity of Jesus' or at any rate very few, and they have not succeeded in disposing of the much stronger, indeed very abundant, evidence to the contrary."[15]Robert E. Van Voorst states that biblical scholars and classical historians regard theories of non-existence of Jesus as effectively refuted.[16] Writing on The Daily Beast, Candida Moss and Joel Baden state that, "there is nigh universal consensus among biblical scholars – the authentic ones, at least – that Jesus was, in fact, a real guy."[17]
^Ehrman writes: "The notion that the Gospel accounts are not completely accurate but still important for the religious truths they try to convey is widely shared in the scholarly world, even though it's not so widely known or believed outside of it."[19] Sanders writes: "The earliest Christians did not write a narrative of Jesus' life, but rather made use of, and thus preserved, individual units—short passages about his words and deeds. These units were later moved and arranged by authors and editors. ... Some material has been revised and some created by early Christians."[20]
^A small minority of Christian denominations reject trinitarianism, wholly or partly, as non-scriptural.
^Part of the Eastern Christian churches celebrate Christmas on 25 December of the Julian calendar, which currently corresponds to 7 January in the Gregorian calendar. In many countries, Christmas is celebrated on 24 December.
^Powell writes: "[Paul] does cite words or instructions of Jesus in a few places,[50] but for the most part he displays little interest in the details of Jesus' earthly life and ministry."[51]
^Amy-Jill Levine writes: "There is a consensus of sorts on a basic outline of Jesus' life. Most scholars agree that Jesus was baptized by John, debated with fellow Jews on how best to live according to God's will, engaged in healings and exorcisms, taught in parables, gathered male and female followers in Galilee, went to Jerusalem, and was crucified by Roman soldiers during the governorship of Pontius Pilate."[310]
^Tuckett writes: "All this does at least render highly implausible any far-fetched theories that even Jesus' very existence was a Christian invention. The fact that Jesus existed, that he was crucified under Pontius Pilate (for whatever reason) and that he had a band of followers who continued to support his cause, seems to be part of the bedrock of historical tradition. If nothing else, the non-Christian evidence can provide us with certainty on that score."[329]
^For example, John P. Meier states that Jesus's birth year is c. 7/6 BC,[1] while Finegan favours c. 3/2 BC.[4]
^In the New Testament, Jesus is described as Jewish / Judean (Ioudaios as written in Koine Greek) on three occasions: by the Magi in Matthew 2:2, who referred to Jesus as "King of the Jews" (basileus ton ioudaion); by both the Samaritan woman at the well in John 4:9 and John 4:20 and by Jesus himself in John 4:22; and (in all four gospels) during the Passion, by the Romans, who also used the phrase "King of the Jews". [429] Jesus was also described as "King of Israel" in John 1:49, John 12:13, Mark 15:32 and Matthew 27:42.[430]
^Ehrman writes: "In simpler terms, the historical Jesus did not exist. Or if he did, he had virtually nothing to do with the founding of Christianity." Further quoting as authoritative the fuller definition provided by Earl Doherty in Jesus: Neither God Nor Man. Age of Reason, 2009, pp. vii–viii: it is "the theory that no historical Jesus worthy of the name existed, that Christianity began with a belief in a spiritual, mythical figure, that the Gospels are essentially allegory and fiction, and that no single identifiable person lay at the root of the Galilean preaching tradition".[440]
^Following the Apostolic Age, there was fierce and often politicized debate in the early church on many interrelated issues. Christology was a major focus of these debates, and was addressed at every one of the first seven ecumenical councils. Some early beliefs viewed Jesus as ontologically subordinate to the Father (Subordinationism), and others considered him an aspect of the Father rather than a separate person (Sabellianism), both were condemned as heresies by the Catholic Church.[28][472] The Church resolved the issues in ancient councils, which established the Holy Trinity, with Jesus both fully human and fully God.[28]
^Philip Schaff commenting on Irenaeus, wrote, 'This censure of images as a Gnostic peculiarity, and as a heathenish corruption, should be noted.' Footnote 300 on Contr. Her. .I.XXV.6. ANF.
^Flavius Josephus writing (about 5 years later, c. AD 75) in The Jewish War (Book VII 1.1) stated that Jerusalem had been flattened to the point that "there was left nothing to make those that came thither believe it had ever been inhabited".[574] And once what was left of the ruins of Jerusalem had been turned into the Roman settlement of Aelia Capitolina, no Jews were allowed to set foot in it.[573]
^Polarized conclusions regarding the Shroud of Turin remain.[577] According to former Nature editor Philip Ball, "it's fair to say that, despite the seemingly definitive tests in 1988, the status of the Shroud of Turin is murkier than ever. Not least, the nature of the image and how it was fixed on the cloth remain deeply puzzling."[578]
^Price, Robert M. (2009). "Jesus at the Vanishing Point". In Beilby, James K.; Eddy, Paul R. (eds.). The Historical Jesus: Five Views. InterVarsity. pp. 55, 61. ISBN978-0-8308-7853-6. Archived from the original on 7 September 2015. Retrieved 14 August 2015.
^Sykes, Stephen W. (2007). "Paul's understanding of the death of Jesus". Sacrifice and Redemption. Cambridge University Press. pp. 35–36. ISBN978-0-521-04460-8.
^Komoszewski, J. Ed; Bock, Darrell, eds. (2019). Jesus, Skepticism & The Problem of History: Criteria and Context in the Study of Christian Origins. Zondervan Academic. pp. 22–23. ISBN9780310534761. ...a considerable number of specific facts about Jesus are so well supported historically as to be widely acknowledged by most scholars, whether Christian (of any stripe) or not:...(lists 18 points)...Nevertheless, what can be known about Jesus with a high degree of confidence, apart from theological or ideological agendas, is perhaps surprisingly robust.
^Craig Evans, "Life-of-Jesus Research and the Eclipse of Mythology", Theological Studies 54 (1993) pp. 13–14, "First, the New Testament Gospels are now viewed as useful, if not essentially reliable, historical sources. Gone is the extreme skepticism that for so many years dominated gospel research. Representative of many is the position of E. P. Sanders and Marcus Borg, who have concluded that it is possible to recover a fairly reliable picture of the historical Jesus."
^ abDunn, James D. G. (2013). The Oral Gospel Tradition. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing. pp. 290–291.
^"anno Domini". Merriam Webster Online Dictionary. Merriam-Webster. 2003. Archived from the original on 22 December 2007. Retrieved 3 November 2016. Etymology: Medieval Latin, in the year of our Lord.
^Burridge, R. A. (2006). Gospels. In J. W. Rogerson & Judith M. Lieu (Eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Biblical Studies. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. p. 433.
^Talbert, C. H. (1977). What is a Gospel? The Genre of the Canonical Gospels. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: Fortress Press.
^Wills, L. M. (1997). The Quest of the Historical Gospel: Mark, John and the Origins of the Gospel Genre. London, England: Routledge. p. 10.
^Burridge, R. A. (2004). What are the Gospels? A Comparison with Graeco-Roman Biography. revised updated edn. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Eerdmans.
^e.g. Vines, M. E. (2002). The Problem of the Markan Genre: The Gospel of Mark and the Jewish Novel. Atlanta, Georgia: Society of Biblical Literature. pp. 161–162.
^O'Collins, Gerald (2009). Christology: A Biblical, Historical, and Systematic Study of Jesus. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. pp. 1–3. ISBN978-0-19-955787-5.
^ abWiarda, Timothy (2010). Interpreting Gospel Narratives: Scenes, People, and Theology. B&H Publishing Group. pp. 75–78. ISBN978-0-8054-4843-6.
^France, R. T. (1985). The Gospel According to Matthew: An Introduction and Commentary. Eerdmans. p. 72. ISBN978-0-8028-0063-3. Archived from the original on 29 February 2020. Retrieved 15 October 2018. "From David the two lists diverge, as Matthew follows the line of succession to the throne of Judah from Solomon, whereas Luke's list goes through Nathan, ... and converges with Matthew's only for the two names of Shealtiel and Zerubabbel until Joseph is reached."
^ abTalbert, Charles H. (2010). Matthew. Baker Academic. pp. 29–30. ISBN978-0-8010-3192-2. Archived from the original on 8 October 2020. Retrieved 8 October 2020.
^Perrotta, Louise B. (2000). Saint Joseph: His Life and His Role in the Church Today. Our Sunday Visitor Publishing. pp. 21, 110–112. ISBN978-0-87973-573-9.
^Liddell, Henry G.; Scott, Robert (1889). An Intermediate Greek–English Lexicon: The Seventh Edition of Liddell and Scott's Greek–English Lexicon. Clarendon Press. p. 797.
^Evans, Craig A. (2001). "Context, family and formation". In Bockmuehl, Markus N. A. (ed.). Cambridge companion to Jesus. Cambridge University Press. pp. 14, 21. ISBN978-0-521-79678-1. Archived from the original on 7 September 2015. Retrieved 14 August 2015.
^ abcHarding, Mark; Nobbs, Alanna (2010). The Content and the Setting of the Gospel Tradition. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing. pp. 281–282. ISBN978-0-8028-3318-1.
^Nash, Henry S. (1909). "Transfiguration, The". In Jackson, Samuel M. (ed.). The New Schaff-Herzog Encyclopedia of Religious Thought: Son of Man-Tremellius V11. Funk & Wagnalls Company. p. 493. ISBN978-1-4286-3189-2. Archived from the original on 7 September 2015. Retrieved 14 August 2015.
^Patella, Michael F. (2009). "The Gospel According to Luke". In Durken, Daniel (ed.). New Collegeville Bible Commentary: New Testament. Liturgical Press. p. 255. ISBN978-0-8146-3260-4. Archived from the original on 10 September 2015. Retrieved 14 August 2015.
^Köstenberger, Andreas J. (1998). The missions of Jesus and the disciples according to the Fourth Gospel. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing. pp. 108–109. ISBN978-0-8028-4255-8.
^Pentecost, J. Dwight (1998). The parables of Jesus: lessons in life from the Master Teacher. Kregel Publications. p. 10. ISBN978-0-8254-9715-5.
^Howick, E. Keith (2003). The Sermons of Jesus the Messiah. WindRiver Publishing. pp. 7–9. ISBN978-1-886249-02-8.
^Karris, Robert J. (1992). The Collegeville Bible Commentary: New Testament. Liturgical Press. pp. 885–886. ISBN978-0-8146-2211-7.
^Kingsbury, Jack D.; Powell, Mark A.; Bauer, David R. (1999). Who do you say that I am? Essays on Christology. Westminster John Knox Press. p. xvi. ISBN978-0-664-25752-1.
^O'Toole, Robert F. (2004). Luke's presentation of Jesus: a christology. Editrice Pontificio Istituto Biblico. p. 166. ISBN978-88-7653-625-0.
^Matthew: "claiming to be king of the Jews". Mark: "King of the Jews". Luke: "subverting nation, opposing payment of taxes to Caesar, claiming to be Christ, a king" John: "breaking Jewish law, claiming to be the son of God".
^Binz, Stephen J. (2004). The Names of Jesus. Twenty-Third Publications. pp. 81–82. ISBN978-1-58595-315-8.
^Catholic Encyclopedia: ProselyteArchived 10 June 2017 at the Wayback Machine: "The English term 'proselyte' occurs only in the New Testament where it signifies a convert to the Jewish religion (Matthew 23:15; Acts 2:11; 6:5; etc.), though the same Greek word is commonly used in the Septuagint to designate a foreigner living in Palestine. Thus the term seems to have passed from an original local and chiefly political sense, in which it was used as early as 300 BC, to a technical and religious meaning in the Judaism of the New Testament epoch."
^Cross, F. L., ed. (2005). "Paul". The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church (3rd rev. ed.). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. ISBN978-0-19-280290-3.
^Cohen, Shaye J. D. (1 January 1987). From the Maccabees to the Mishnah. Philadelphia, Pa: Westminster John Knox Press. pp. 224–225. ISBN978-0-664-25017-1.
^Ehrman, Bart D. (1997). The New Testament: A Historical Introduction to the Early Christian Writings. Oxford University Press. p. 8. ISBN978-0-19-508481-8. Archived from the original on 16 April 2019. Retrieved 1 May 2018. The New Testament contains twenty-seven books, written in Greek, by fifteen or sixteen different authors, who were addressing other Christian individuals or communities between the years 50 and 120 C.E. (see box 1.4). As we will see, it is difficult to know whether any of these books were written by Jesus' own disciples.
^Charlesworth, James H.; Pokorny, Petr (15 September 2009). Jesus Research. Grand Rapids, Mich: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing. pp. 1–2. ISBN978-0-8028-6353-9. OCLC318971485.
^Barr, James (1989). "Chapter 3 – Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek in the Hellenistic age". In Davies, W. D.; Finkelstein, Louis (eds.). The Cambridge history of Judaism. Volume 2: The Hellenistic Age (1. publ. ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 79–114. ISBN978-1-139-05512-3.
^Anderson, Paul N.; Just, Felix; Thatcher, Tom (2007). John, Jesus, and History. Vol. 2. Society of Biblical Literature. p. 291. ISBN978-1-58983-293-0. Archived from the original on 10 September 2015. Retrieved 14 August 2015.
^Anderson, Paul N.; Just, Felix; Thatcher, Tom (2007). John, Jesus, and History. Vol. 2. Society of Biblical Literature. p. 292. ISBN978-1-58983-293-0. Archived from the original on 10 September 2015. Retrieved 14 August 2015.
^Tuckett, Christopher (2001). "Sources and methods". In Bockmuehl, Markus N.A. (ed.). Cambridge Companion to Jesus. Cambridge University Press. pp. 123–24. ISBN978-0-521-79678-1.
^ abGowler, David B. (2007). What are they saying about the historical Jesus?. Paulist Press. p. 102. ISBN978-0-8091-4445-7.
^Charlesworth, James H., ed. (2006). "Archived copy". Jesus and archaeology. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing. p. 127. ISBN978-0-8028-4880-2. Archived from the original on 7 September 2015. Retrieved 14 August 2015.
^Evans, Craig (2006). "Josephus on John the Baptist". In Levine, Amy-Jill; Allison, Dale C.; Crossan, John D. (eds.). The Historical Jesus in Context. Princeton, New Jersey, USA: Princeton University Press. pp. 55–58. ISBN978-0-691-00992-6. Archived from the original on 3 May 2016. Retrieved 25 January 2016.
^Gillman, Florence M. (2003). Herodias: at home in that fox's den. Liturgical Press. pp. 25–30. ISBN978-0-8146-5108-7.
^Bromiley, Geoffrey William (1979). The International Standard Bible Encyclopedia. Vol. 4. Grand Rapids, Mich: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing. p. 991. ISBN978-0-8028-3784-4.
^Funk, Robert W.; The Jesus Seminar (1998). "Birth & Infancy Stories". The acts of Jesus: the search for the authentic deeds of Jesus. HarperSanFrancisco. pp. 497–526.
^Ehrman, Bart (1 December 2015). "Judas and the Messianic Secret". The Bart Ehrman Blog. Archived from the original on 23 February 2016. Retrieved 15 February 2016.
^Ehrman, Bart (1 December 2015). "Jesus' Claim to be the Messiah". The Bart Ehrman Blog. Archived from the original on 23 February 2016. Retrieved 15 February 2016.
^ abJacobs, Joseph; Kohler, Kaufmann; Gottheil, Richard; Krauss, Samuel. "Jesus of Nazareth". Jewish Encyclopedia. Archived from the original on 26 February 2016. See Avodah Zarah 17a:1, Sanhedrin 43a:20, Gittin 57a:3–4, and Sotah 47a:6.
^Brown, Colin (2011). "Why Study the Historical Jesus?". In Holmen, Tom; Porter, Stanley E. (eds.). Handbook for the Study of the Historical Jesus. Brill. p. 1416. ISBN978-90-04-16372-0. Archived from the original on 10 September 2015. Retrieved 14 August 2015.
^Myers, Allen C., ed. (1987). "Aramaic". The Eerdmans Bible Dictionary. Grand Rapids, Michigan: William B. Eerdmans. p. 72. ISBN978-0-8028-2402-8. It is generally agreed that Aramaic was the common language of Israel in the first century AD. Jesus and his disciples spoke the Galilean dialect, which was distinguished from that of Jerusalem (Matt. 26:73).
^Miller, David M. (2010). "The Meaning of Ioudaios and its Relationship to Other Group Labels in Ancient 'Judaism'". Currents in Biblical Research. 9 (1): 98–126. doi:10.1177/1476993X09360724. S2CID144383064.
^Jensen, Robin M. (2010). "Jesus in Christian art". In Burkett, Delbert (ed.). The Blackwell Companion to Jesus. John Wiley & Sons. pp. 477–502. ISBN978-1-4443-5175-0.
^ abPerkinson, Stephen (2009). The likeness of the king: a prehistory of portraiture in late medieval France. Chicago, Illinois, USA: University of Chicago Press. p. 30. ISBN978-0-226-65879-7.
^Ehrman 2011, pp. 256–257: "He certainly existed, as virtually every competent scholar of antiquity, Christian or non-Christian, agrees, based on certain and clear evidence."
^Gullotta, Daniel N. (2017). "On Richard Carrier's Doubts: A Response to Richard Carrier's On the Historicity of Jesus: Why We Might Have Reason for Doubt". Journal for the Study of the Historical Jesus. 15 (2–3): 312. doi:10.1163/17455197-01502009. [Per Jesus mythicism] Given the fringe status of these theories, the vast majority have remained unnoticed and unaddressed within scholarly circles.
^Dunn, James D. G. (3 December 2007). "Paul's understanding of the death of Jesus". In S. W. Sykes (ed.). Sacrifice and Redemption. Cambridge University Press. pp. 35–36. ISBN978-0-521-04460-8.
^Burridge, Richard A.; Gould, Graham (2004). Jesus Now and Then. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing. p. 34. ISBN978-0-8028-0977-3.
^Voorst, Robert Van (13 April 2000). Jesus Outside the New Testament: An Introduction to the Ancient Evidence. Grand Rapids, Mich: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing. p. 16. ISBN978-0-8028-4368-5.
^Bockmuehl, Markus, ed. (8 November 2001). The Cambridge Companion to Jesus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 156–157. ISBN0-521-79678-4.
^Evans, C. Stephen (1996). The Historical Christ and the Jesus of Faith. Oxford : New York: Oxford University Press. p. v. ISBN0-19-826397-X.
^Bauckham, Richard (2011). Jesus: A Very Short Introduction. United States: Oxford University Press. pp. 1–2. ISBN978-0199575275.
^ abcHitti, Philip K. (1928). The Origins of the Druze People and Religion: With Extracts from Their Sacred Writings. Library of Alexandria. p. 37. ISBN978-1-4655-4662-3.
^Watson, Francis (2001). "The quest for the real Jesus". In Bockmuehl, Markus N. A. (ed.). Cambridge companion to Jesus. Cambridge University Press. pp. 156–157. ISBN978-0-521-79678-1. Archived from the original on 10 September 2015. Retrieved 14 August 2015.
^Evans, C. Stephen (1996). The historical Christ and the Jesus of faith. Oxford University Press. p. v. ISBN978-0-19-152042-6.
^Delbert, Burkett (2010). The Blackwell Companion to Jesus. John Wiley & Sons. p. 1. ISBN978-1-4443-5175-0.
^Jackson, Gregory L. (1993). Catholic, Lutheran, Protestant: a doctrinal comparison. Christian News. pp. 11–17. ISBN978-0-615-16635-3.
^McGuckin, John A. (2010). The Orthodox Church: An Introduction to Its History, Doctrine. John Wiley & Sons. pp. 6–7. ISBN978-1-4443-9383-5.
^Leith, John H. (1993). Basic Christian doctrine. Westminster John Knox Press. pp. 1–2. ISBN978-0-664-25192-5.
^Friedmann, Robert. "Antitrinitarianism". Global Anabaptist Mennonite Encyclopedia. Archived from the original on 20 October 2012. Retrieved 24 October 2012.
^Neuhaus, David M. "How Israeli Jews' Fear of Christianity Turned Into Hatred". Haaretz. Archived from the original on 27 March 2023. Retrieved 24 July 2023. The religious public in Israel is in many cases aware of the traditional interpretation of the term "Yeshu": an acronym in Hebrew for "may his name and memory be blotted out.
^Bevan, A. A. (1930). "Manichaeism". In Hastings, James (ed.). Encyclopaedia of Religion and Ethics. Vol. 8. Kessinger Publishing. ISBN978-0-7661-3666-3.
^Paget, James C. (2001). "Quests for the historical Jesus". In Bockmuehl, Markus N.A. (ed.). Cambridge companion to Jesus. Cambridge University Press. p. 183. ISBN978-0-521-79678-1. Archived from the original on 10 September 2015. Retrieved 14 August 2015.
^Ashraf, Irshad (Director) (19 August 2007). The Muslim Jesus (Television production). ITV Productions.
^Quran 4:157: "and for boasting, "We killed the Messiah, Jesus, son of Mary, the messenger of Allah." But they neither killed nor crucified him—it was only made to appear so. Even those who argue for this ˹crucifixion˺ are in doubt. They have no knowledge whatsoever—only making assumptions. They certainly did not kill him."
^Wilhelm, Joseph (1911). "The Nicene Creed". The Catholic Encyclopedia. Vol. 11. Robert Appleton Company. Archived from the original on 17 April 2016. Retrieved 11 April 2016.
^Dana, Nissim (2008). The Druze in the Middle East: Their Faith, Leadership, Identity and Status. Michigan University Press. p. 47. ISBN978-1-903900-36-9.
^Dana, Nissim (1980). The Druse, a Religious Community in Transition. Turtledove. p. 11. ISBN978-965-200-028-6.
^Betts, Robert Brenton (1988). The Druze. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. p. 21. ISBN978-0-300-04810-0.
^Swayd, Samy (2019). The A to Z of the Druzes. Rowman & Littlefield. p. xxxviii. ISBN978-0-8108-7002-4.
^Swayd, Samy (2019). The A to Z of the Druzes. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 88. ISBN978-0-8108-7002-4. Jesus is known in the Druze tradition as the "True Messiah" (al-Masih al-Haq), for he delivered what Druzes view as the true message. He is also referred to as the "Messiah of the Nations" (Masih al-Umam) because he was sent to the world as "Masih of Sins" because he is the one who forgives.
^Gutmann, Joseph (1992). "Early Christian and Jewish Art". In Attridge, Harold W.; Hata, Gohei (eds.). Eusebius, Christianity, and Judaism. Wayne State University Press. pp. 283–284. ISBN978-0-8143-2361-8. Archived from the original on 10 September 2015. Retrieved 14 August 2015.
^Benedetto, Robert (2006). The New Westminster Dictionary of Church History. Westminster John Knox Press. pp. 51–53. ISBN978-0-664-22416-5.
^Michalski, Sergiusz (1993). Reformation and the Visual Arts. Routledge. p. 195. ISBN978-1-134-92102-7.
^Payton, James R. (2007). Light from the Christian East: An Introduction to the Orthodox Tradition. InterVarsity Press. pp. 178–179. ISBN978-0-8308-2594-3.
^Williams, Rowan (2003). The Dwelling of the Light: Praying with Icons of Christ. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing. p. 83. ISBN978-0-8028-2778-4.
^Casiday, Augustine (2012). The Orthodox Christian World. Routledge. p. 447. ISBN978-0-415-45516-9.
^Bigham, Steven (1995). The image of God the Father in Orthodox theology and iconography. St Vladimir's Seminary Press. pp. 226–227. ISBN978-1-879038-15-8.
^ abHelmut KoesterIntroduction to the New Testament, Vol. 1: History, Culture, and Religion of the Hellenistic Age. Berlin, Germany: de Gruyter Press, 1995, p. 382.
^Flavius Josephus, The Jewish War Book VII, section 1.1"
^Margaret M. Mitchell "The Cambridge History of Christianity, Volume 1: Origins to Constantine" Cambridge University Press 2006, p. 298.
De Smet, Daniel (2016). "Les racines docétistes de l'imamologie shi'ite". In Amir-Moezzi, Mohammad Ali; De Cillis, Maria; De Smet, Daniel; Mir-Kasimov, Orkhan (eds.). L'Ésotérisme shi'ite, ses racines et ses prolongements – Shi'i Esotericism: Its Roots and Developments. Bibliothèque de l'Ecole des Hautes Etudes, Sciences Religieuses (in French). Vol. 177. Turnhout: Brepols. pp. 87–112. doi:10.1484/M.BEHE-EB.4.01163. ISBN978-2-503-56874-4.
Dillenberger, John (1999). Images and Relics: Theological Perceptions and Visual Images in Sixteenth-Century Europe. Oxford University Press. ISBN978-0-19-976146-3.
Friedmann, Yohanan (1989). Prophecy Continuous: Aspects of Ahmadi Religious Thought and Its Medieval Background. Berkeley: University of California Press. ISBN978-0-520-05772-2.
Melton, J. Gordon (2010). "Ahmad, Mirza Ghulam Hazrat". In Melton, J. Gordon; Baumann, Martin (eds.). Religions of the World: A Comprehensive Encyclopedia of Beliefs and Practices. Vol. 1 (2nd ed.). Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO. pp. 54–56. ISBN978-1-59884-203-6. Archived from the original on 21 October 2016. Retrieved 14 August 2015.
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
_-_James_Tissot.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
_Cropped.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
