PROFILPELAJAR.COM

Gothic
Gothic;
Script type	Alphabet
Time period	From c. 350, in decline by 600
Direction	Left-to-right
Languages	Gothic
Related scripts
Parent systems	Greek script augmented with Latin and possibly Runic (questionable) Gothic;
ISO 15924
ISO 15924	Goth (206), Gothic
Unicode
Unicode alias	Gothic
Unicode range	U+10330–U+1034F
	This article contains phonetic transcriptions in the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA). For an introductory guide on IPA symbols, see Help:IPA. For the distinction between [ ], / / and ⟨ ⟩, see IPA § Brackets and transcription delimiters.

This article contains Gothic characters. Without proper rendering support, you may see question marks, boxes, or other symbols instead of letters.

The Gothic alphabet is an alphabet for writing the Gothic language. It was developed in the 4th century AD by Ulfilas (or Wulfila), a Gothic preacher of Cappadocian Greek descent, for the purpose of translating the Bible.^[1]

The alphabet essentially uses uncial forms of the Greek alphabet, with a few additional letters to express Gothic phonology:

Latin F.
A Runic letter to distinguish the /w/ glide from vocalic /u/.
The letter hwair (ƕ) to express the Gothic labiovelar.

Origin

Ulfilas is thought to have consciously chosen to avoid the use of the older Runic alphabet for this purpose, as it was heavily connected with pagan beliefs and customs.^[2] Also, the Greek-based script probably helped to integrate the Gothic nation into the dominant Greco-Roman culture around the Black Sea.^[3]

Letters

Below is a table of the Gothic alphabet.^[4] Two letters used in its transliteration are not used in current English: thorn ⟨þ⟩ (representing /θ/), and hwair ⟨ƕ⟩ (representing /hʷ/).

As with the Greek alphabet, Gothic letters were also assigned numerical values. When used as numerals, letters were written either between two dots (•𐌹𐌱• = 12) or with an overline (𐌹𐌱 = 12). Two letters, 𐍁 (90) and 𐍊 (900), have no phonetic value.

The letter names are recorded in a 9th-century manuscript of Alcuin (Codex Vindobonensis 795). Most of them seem to be Gothic forms of names also appearing in the rune poems. The names are given in their attested forms followed by the reconstructed Gothic forms and their meanings.^[5]

	Translit.	Compare	Alcuin name	Gothic name	PGmc rune name	IPA	Numeric value	XML entity
𐌰	a	Α, Ⲁ	aza	𐌰𐌽𐍃 (ans) "god" or 𐌰𐍃𐌺𐍃 (asks) "ash"	*ansuz	/a, aː/	1	𐌰
𐌱	b	Β, Ⲃ	bercna	𐌱𐌰𐌹𐍂𐌺𐌰𐌽 (bairkan) "birch"	*berkanan	/b/ [b, β]	2	𐌱
𐌲	g	Γ, Ⲅ	geuua	𐌲𐌹𐌱𐌰 (giba) "gift"	*gebō	/ɡ/ [ɡ, ɣ, x]; /n/ [ŋ]	3	𐌲
𐌳	d	Δ, D, Ⲇ	daaz	𐌳𐌰𐌲𐍃 (dags) "day"	*dagaz	/d/ [d, ð]	4	𐌳
𐌴	e	Ε, Ⲉ	eyz	𐌰𐌹𐍈𐍃 (aiƕs) "horse" or 𐌴𐌹𐍅𐍃 (eiws) "yew"	eihwaz, ehwaz	/eː/	5	𐌴
𐌵	q	(Ϛ), ϰ, Ⲋ(?)	quetra	𐌵𐌰𐌹𐍂𐌸𐍂𐌰 (qairþra) ??? or 𐌵𐌰𐌹𐍂𐌽𐌰 (qairna) "millstone"	(see *perþō)	/kʷ/	6	𐌵
𐌶	z	Ζ, Ⲍ	ezec	(?)^[6] Likely related to *idzēta.^[7]	*algiz	/z/	7	𐌶
𐌷	h	Η, Ⲏ	haal	𐌷𐌰𐌲𐌰𐌻 (hagal) or 𐌷𐌰𐌲𐌻𐍃 (hagls) "hail"	*haglaz	/h/, /x/	8	𐌷
𐌸	þ (th)	Φ, Ψ, Ⲑ	thyth	𐌸𐌹𐌿𐌸 (þiuþ) "good" or 𐌸𐌰𐌿𐍂𐌽𐌿𐍃 (þaurnus) "thorn"	*thurisaz	/θ/	9	𐌸
𐌹	i	Ι, Ⲓ	iiz	𐌴𐌹𐍃 (eis) "ice"	*īsaz	/i/	10	𐌹
𐌺	k	Κ, Ⲕ	chozma	𐌺𐌿𐍃𐌼𐌰 (kusma) or 𐌺𐍉𐌽𐌾𐌰 (kōnja) "pine sap"	*kaunan	/k/	20	𐌺
𐌻	l	Λ, Ⲗ	laaz	𐌻𐌰𐌲𐌿𐍃 (lagus) "sea, lake"	*laguz	/l/	30	𐌻
𐌼	m	Μ, Ⲙ	manna	𐌼𐌰𐌽𐌽𐌰 (manna) "man"	*mannaz	/m/	40	𐌼
𐌽	n	Ν, Ⲛ	noicz	𐌽𐌰𐌿𐌸𐍃 (nauþs) "need"	*naudiz	/n/	50	𐌽
𐌾	j	G, ᛃ, Ⲝ(?)	gaar	𐌾𐌴𐍂 (jēr) "year, harvest"	*jēran	/j/	60	𐌾
𐌿	u	ᚢ, Ⲟ(?)	uraz	𐌿𐍂𐌿𐍃 (ūrus) "aurochs"	*ūruz	/ʊ/, /uː/	70	𐌿
𐍀	p	Π, Ⲡ	pertra	𐍀𐌰𐌹𐍂𐌸𐍂𐌰 (pairþra) ???	*perþō	/p/	80	𐍀
𐍁		Ϙ, Ϥ			90		90	𐍁
𐍂	r	R, Ⲣ	reda	𐍂𐌰𐌹𐌳𐌰 (raida) "wagon"	*raidō	/r/	100	𐍂
𐍃	s	S, Ⲥ	sugil	𐍃𐌰𐌿𐌹𐌻 (sauil) "sun" or 𐍃𐍉𐌾𐌹𐌻 (sōjil) "sun"	*sôwilô	/s/	200	𐍃
𐍄	t	Τ, ᛏ, Ⲧ	tyz	𐍄𐌹𐌿𐍃 (tius) "the god Týr"	*tīwaz	/t/	300	𐍄
𐍅	w	Υ, Ⲩ	uuinne	𐍅𐌹𐌽𐌾𐌰 (winja) "field, pasture" or 𐍅𐌹𐌽𐌽𐌰 (winna) "pain"	*wunjō	/w/, /y/	400	𐍅
𐍆	f	Ϝ, F, Ⲫ(?)	fe	𐍆𐌰𐌹𐌷𐌿 (faihu) "wealth, chattel"	*fehu	/ɸ/	500	𐍆
𐍇	x	Χ, Ⲭ	enguz	𐌹𐌲𐌲𐌿𐍃 (iggus) or 𐌹𐌲𐌲𐍅𐍃 (iggws) "the god Yngvi"	*ingwaz	/k/^[8]	600	𐍇
𐍈	ƕ (hw)	Θ, Ⲯ(?)	uuaer	𐍈𐌰𐌹𐍂 (hwair) "kettle"		/hʷ/, /ʍ/	700	𐍈
𐍉	ō	Ω, Ο, ᛟ, Ⲱ	utal	𐍉𐌸𐌰𐌻 (ōþal) "ancestral land"	*ōþala	/oː/	800	𐍉
𐍊		ᛏ, Ͳ (Ϡ), Ⳁ					900	𐍊

Most of the letters have been taken over directly from the Greek alphabet, though a few have been created or modified from Latin and possibly (more controversially^[9]) Runic letters to express unique phonological features of Gothic. These are:

𐌵 - q; derived either from a form of Greek stigma/digamma (),^[9] or from a cursive variant of kappa (ϰ), which could strongly resemble a u.^[9]
𐌸 - þ; derived either from Greek phi (Φ) /f/ or psi (Ψ) /ps/ with phonetic reassignment, Runic ᚦ,^[10] or a cursive form of Ⲑ from the 4th century.^[11]
𐌾 - j; derived from Latin G /ɡ/^[9]
𐌿 - u; possibly an allograph of Greek Ο (cf. the numerical values), or from Runic ᚢ /u/)^[12]
𐍈 - ƕ; potentially derived from Greek Θ /θ/ with phonetic reassignment; possibly the letterform was switched with 𐌸;^[9] also possibly pictographic in nature, with O for rounding and • for aspiration.^[13]
𐍉 - o; derived either from Greek Ω or from Runic ᛟ,^[14] or from a cursive form of Greek Ο, as such a form was more common for omicron than for omega in this time period, and as the sound values of omicron and omega had already merged by this time,^[9] though the idea that it was derived from omicron does not explain why omega and 𐍉 occupy the same numerical spot, the similarity between the Gothic alphabet ending with 𐍆 𐍇 𐍈 𐍉 and the Greek alphabet ending with Φ Χ Ψ Ω, or the fact that the Gothic alphabet is ordered from 𐌰 to 𐍉 like the Greek alphabet being ordered from Α to Ω.^[15]

𐍂 (r), 𐍃 (s) and 𐍆 (f) appear to be derived from their Latin equivalents rather than from the Greek, although the equivalent Runic letters (ᚱ, ᛋ and ᚠ), assumed to have been part of the Gothic futhark, possibly played some role in this choice.^[16] However, Snædal claims that "Wulfila's knowledge of runes was questionable to say the least", as the paucity of inscriptions attests that knowledge and use of runes was rare among the East Germanic peoples.^[9] Miller refutes this claim, stating that it is "not implausible" that Wulfila used a runic script in his creation of the Gothic alphabet, noting six other authors—Wimmer, Mensel, Hermann, d'Alquen, Rousseau, and Falluomini—who support the idea of the Gothic alphabet having runic contributions.^[15] Some variants of 𐍃 (s) are shaped like a sigma and more obviously derive from the Greek Σ.^[9]

𐍇 (x) is only used in proper names and loanwords containing Greek Χ (xristus "Christ", galiugaxristus "Pseudo-Christ", zaxarias "Zacharias", aiwxaristia "eucharist").^[17]

Regarding the letters' numeric values, most correspond to those of the Greek numerals. Gothic 𐌵 takes the place of Ϝ (6), 𐌾 takes the place of ξ (60), 𐌿 that of Ο (70), and 𐍈 that of ψ (700).

Diacritics and punctuation

Diacritics and punctuation used in the Codex Argenteus include a trema placed on 𐌹 i, transliterated as ï, in general applied to express diaeresis, the interpunct (·) and colon (:) as well as overlines to indicate sigla (such as xaus for xristaus) and numerals.

Unicode

The Gothic alphabet was added to the Unicode Standard in March 2001 with the release of version 3.1.

The Unicode block for Gothic is U+10330– U+1034F in the Supplementary Multilingual Plane. As older software that uses UCS-2 (the predecessor of UTF-16) assumes that all Unicode codepoints can be expressed as 16 bit numbers (U+FFFF or lower, the Basic Multilingual Plane), problems may be encountered using the Gothic alphabet Unicode range and others outside of the Basic Multilingual Plane.

Gothic^[1]^[2] Official Unicode Consortium code chart (PDF)
	0	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	A	B	C	D	E	F
U+1033x	𐌰	𐌱	𐌲	𐌳	𐌴	𐌵	𐌶	𐌷	𐌸	𐌹	𐌺	𐌻	𐌼	𐌽	𐌾	𐌿
U+1034x	𐍀	𐍁	𐍂	𐍃	𐍄	𐍅	𐍆	𐍇	𐍈	𐍉	𐍊
Notes 1.^ As of Unicode version 16.0 2.^ Grey areas indicate non-assigned code points

Notes

^ According to the testimony of the historians Philostorgius, Socrates of Constantinople and Sozomen. Cf. Streitberg (1910:20).
^ Cf. Jensen (1969:474).
^ Cf. Haarmann (1991:434).
^ For a discussion of the Gothic alphabet see also Fausto Cercignani, The Elaboration of the Gothic Alphabet and Orthography, in "Indogermanische Forschungen", 93, 1988, pp. 168–185.
^ The forms which are not attested in the Gothic corpus are marked with an asterisk. For a detailed discussion of the reconstructed forms, cf. Kirchhoff (1854). For a survey of the relevant literature, cf. Zacher (1855).
^ Zacher arrives at *iuya, *iwja or *ius, cognate to ON ȳr, OE īw, ēow, OHG īwa "yew tree", though he admits having no ready explanation for the form ezec. Cf. Zacher (1855:10–13).
^ Miller (2019:22)
^ Streitberg, p. 47
^ ^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h Magnús Snædal (2015). "Gothic Contact with Latin" in Early Germanic Languages in Contact, Ed. John Ole Askedal and Hans Frede Nielsen.
^ Cf. Mees (2002/2003:65)
^ Marchand (1973:20)
^ Cf. Kirchhoff (1854:55).
^ Miller (2019:23)
^ Haarmann (1991:434).
^ ^a ^b Miller (2019:25)
^ Cf. Kirchhoff (1854:55–56); Friesen (1915:306–310).
^ Wright (1910:5).

References

Braune, Wilhelm (1952). Gotische Grammatik. Halle: Max Niemeyer.
Cercignani, Fausto (1988). "The Elaboration of the Gothic Alphabet and Orthography", in Indogermanische Forschungen, 93, pp. 168–185.
Dietrich, Franz (1862). Über die Aussprache des Gotischen Wärend der Zeit seines Bestehens. Marburg: N. G. Elwert'sche Universitätsbuchhandlung.
Friesen, Otto von (1915). "Gotische Schrift" in Hoops, J. Reallexikon der germanischen Altertumskunde, Bd. II. pp. 306–310. Strassburg: Karl J. Trübner.
Haarmann, Harald (1991). Universalgeschichte der Schrift. Frankfurt: Campus.
Jensen, Hans (1969). Die Schrift in Vergangenheit und Gegenwart. Berlin: Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften.
Kirchhoff, Adolf (1854). Das gothische Runenalphabet. Berlin: Wilhelm Hertz.
Mees, Bernard (2002/2003). "Runo-Gothica: the runes and the origin of Wulfila's script", in Die Sprache, 43, pp. 55–79.
Streitberg, Wilhelm (1910). Gotisches Elementarbuch. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.
Weingärtner, Wilhelm (1858). Die Aussprache des Gotischen zur Zeit Ulfilas. Leipzig: T. O. Weigel.
Wright, Joseph (1910). Grammar of the Gothic Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zacher, Julius (1855). Das gothische Alphabet Vulfilas und das Runenalphabet. Leipzig: F. A. Brockhaus.
Miller, D. Gary (2019). The Oxford Gothic Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Marchand, James (1973). The Sounds and Phonemes of Wulfila's Gothic. De Gruyter Mouton.