Hello Quanticle, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

You might like some of these links and tips:

• Some general guidance.
• Tutorial and the Manual of Style.
• Find out how to revert, move and merge pages.
• Sign your posts on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~).
• Ask questions at the Village pump or Help desk.
• Use the Show preview button
• Provide an Edit summary
• Add the correct image copyright tag to any images you upload
• Create a User page

If, for some reason, you are unable to fix a problem yourself, feel free to ask someone else to do it. Wikipedia has a vibrant community of contributors who have a wide range of skills and specialties, and many of them would be glad to help. As well as the wiki community pages there are IRC Channels, where you are more than welcome to ask for assistance.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me on my talk page. Thanks and happy editing,-- JoanneB 19:09, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2007-05-08T19:09:00.000Z","author":"JoanneB","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-JoanneB-2007-05-08T19:09:00.000Z-Welcome_to_Wikipedia!","replies":[],"displayName":"Joanne"}}-->

You placed an AfD tag. I've deleted it as a speedy delete per WP:Speedy. Tyrenius (talk) 05:41, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2007-12-07T05:41:00.000Z","author":"Tyrenius","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Tyrenius-2007-12-07T05:41:00.000Z-Tideworks_Technology","replies":[]}}-->

An article that you have been involved in editing, Tomb Raider Trio, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tomb Raider Trio. Thank you. huji—TALK 18:11, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2007-12-10T18:11:00.000Z","author":"Huji","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Huji-2007-12-10T18:11:00.000Z-AfD_nomination_of_Tomb_Raider_Trio","replies":[]}}-->

I've reverted your edits regarding GDP. In contrast to your edit summary ("Updated Infobox with CIA World Factbook stats about GDP"), you actually used older data (the factbook clearly states the numbers are "2006 est.", whereas the IMF source is dated October 2007).

Even if the CIA source was up to date, there's no reason to prefer it, being a non-academic, general source (which has been found to be erroneous in many cases), over a professional source, like the International Monetary Fund. There's a short discussion about GDP in the article's talk page, if you find it interesting. okedem (talk) 17:51, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-01-17T17:51:00.000Z","author":"Okedem","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Okedem-2008-01-17T17:51:00.000Z-Israel","replies":[]}}-->

Hello, Quanticle. Here is my user's page. - JP Watrin (talk) 04:15, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-01-19T04:15:00.000Z","author":"JP Watrin","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-JP_Watrin-2008-01-19T04:15:00.000Z-IRC","replies":["c-JP_Watrin-2008-01-19T04:42:00.000Z-JP_Watrin-2008-01-19T04:15:00.000Z"]}}-->

• Thank you for your support, anyway. Good work in Wikipedia. - JP Watrin (talk) 04:42, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-01-19T04:42:00.000Z","author":"JP Watrin","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-JP_Watrin-2008-01-19T04:42:00.000Z-JP_Watrin-2008-01-19T04:15:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Thank you for improving Wikipedia.

Your recent edit[1] to threaded code, at first glance, appears to be a good application of Refactor By Condensing Question Answer Pair.

Alas, I reverted that edit. See Talk:Threaded code#some_redundancies_cannot_be_eliminated_by_subroutines for details. --68.0.124.33 (talk) 14:46, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-05-30T14:46:00.000Z","author":"68.0.124.33","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-68.0.124.33-2008-05-30T14:46:00.000Z-threaded_code","replies":[]}}-->

You said you were interested in writing a couple of articles requested by a PR rep. Drop me an email and I'll put you in contact with her. Raul654 (talk) 05:42, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-06-10T05:42:00.000Z","author":"Raul654","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Raul654-2008-06-10T05:42:00.000Z-Poke","replies":[]}}-->

Quizzians of queer quarreling quanticles!!! Havent seen you around these days. LuciferTiger (talk) 19:23, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-06-18T19:23:00.000Z","author":"LuciferTiger","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-LuciferTiger-2008-06-18T19:23:00.000Z-Poke","replies":[]}}-->

I saw that you placed a speedy tag on this article. Would you mind looking at it again and seeing if the new information I've added to the article helps your assessment of it? Movingboxes (talk) 06:58, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-08-22T06:58:00.000Z","author":"Movingboxes","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Movingboxes-2008-08-22T06:58:00.000Z-Maud_Slye","replies":[]}}-->

Was an Italian senator and therefore unquestionably notable. I would in any case normally at least consider whether an article about an Italian found in the itWP is likely to be sufficiently notable, and read it very carefully. As reviewing administrator, I of course, declined the speedy. DGG (talk) 19:56, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-08-26T19:56:00.000Z","author":"DGG","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-DGG-2008-08-26T19:56:00.000Z-Pignorini","replies":[]}}-->

Thank you for noticing the article London, West Virginia. I declined the speedy because the Wikipedia convention is that all towns are notable. I added a reference and coordinates. -- Eastmain (talk) 02:12, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-08-28T02:12:00.000Z","author":"Eastmain","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Eastmain-2008-08-28T02:12:00.000Z-London,_West_Virginia","replies":[]}}-->

I have protested your deletion of Pirate Badgers. check out the website. It is perfectly fine with Wikipedia. http://piratebadgers.tripod.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by PirateBadgers (talk • contribs) 18:39, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-08-28T18:39:00.000Z","author":"PirateBadgers","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-PirateBadgers-2008-08-28T18:39:00.000Z-Pirate_Badgers","replies":[]}}-->

Hi. :) I came across your speedy deletion tag on CSQ Magazine, and I just wanted to point out to you that {{db-a7}} is specifically for people (individually or grouped) and websites. There is currently no consensus for speedily deleting other articles types under this criterion. Other articles that fail to assert notability should go through proposed deletion or articles for deletion. Thanks for keeping an eye out on article quality. :) --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 19:14, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-08-28T19:14:00.000Z","author":"Moonriddengirl","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Moonriddengirl-2008-08-28T19:14:00.000Z-CSD:A7","replies":["c-Moonriddengirl-2008-08-28T19:28:00.000Z-Moonriddengirl-2008-08-28T19:14:00.000Z"]}}-->

It does cover companies--groups of people--but not their products, like books, magazines, albums, etc. It's been discussed several times adding those to A7, but so far consensus has not been reached to do so. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 19:28, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-08-28T19:28:00.000Z","author":"Moonriddengirl","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Moonriddengirl-2008-08-28T19:28:00.000Z-Moonriddengirl-2008-08-28T19:14:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Hi Quanticle. I declined your A7-speedy tag of Michelle Biloon. The multiple television appearances were, in my view, an assertion of importance. Best, Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 22:25, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-08-28T22:25:00.000Z","author":"Paul Erik","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Paul_Erik-2008-08-28T22:25:00.000Z-CSD:A7","replies":[]}}-->

Your replacement of unicodes by question marks in this edit did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted. Please don't do that. —David Eppstein (talk) 03:19, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2009-03-18T03:19:00.000Z","author":"David Eppstein","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-David_Eppstein-2009-03-18T03:19:00.000Z-Unicode","replies":[]}}-->

Thanks for the corrections in the article dulce de batata. GreatFish (talk) 16:45, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2009-08-26T16:45:00.000Z","author":"GreatFish","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-GreatFish-2009-08-26T16:45:00.000Z-Thanks","replies":[]}}-->

Nominating a page for deletion just because it is not in English is not standard practice in Wikipedia. Instead, we nominate them for translation and if after two weeks after listing no translator shows up then the page can be nominated for deletion. However, please note that if you understand the language the article is written in, all other deletion criteria still apply. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 00:38, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2010-01-05T00:38:00.000Z","author":"Blanchardb","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Blanchardb-2010-01-05T00:38:00.000Z-Foreign-language_articles","replies":[],"displayName":"Me"}}-->

The Editor's Barnstar

for a great job editing Mark Burnett and pulling it up to standards. Philippe Beaudette, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 18:08, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2011-11-02T18:08:00.000Z","author":"Philippe (WMF)","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Philippe_(WMF)-2011-11-02T18:08:00.000Z-A_barnstar_for_you!","replies":[],"displayName":"Philippe Beaudette, Wikimedia Foundation"}}-->

		The FOR SCIENCE! Barnstar
		For your hand-coding participation, I award you the new FOR SCIENCE! Barnstar :). Now hurry up and apply for that backend role! Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 12:33, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-04-27T12:33:00.000Z","author":"Okeyes (WMF)","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Okeyes_(WMF)-2012-04-27T12:33:00.000Z-Moar_stars","replies":[]}}-->

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:20, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-11-23T16:20:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2015-11-23T16:20:00.000Z-ArbCom_elections_are_now_open!","replies":[]}}-->

Hello, Quanticle. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-11-21T22:08:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-11-21T22:08:00.000Z-ArbCom_Elections_2016:_Voting_now_open!","replies":[]}}-->

Hello, Quanticle. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-12-03T18:42:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2017-12-03T18:42:00.000Z-ArbCom_2017_election_voter_message","replies":[]}}-->

Hello, Quanticle. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2018-11-19T18:42:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2018-11-19T18:42:00.000Z-ArbCom_2018_election_voter_message","replies":[]}}-->