User talk:Notcharizard

Archives

1 2 3

I listed links to all the books which Alisa Kwitney edited or wrote. One can look up the titles and see that she is listed as an editor on the books linked. She is also credited as a writer but not as an editor. Can you please unarchive the changes, or tell me what sources you require? Vertigal (talk) 14:33, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Vertigal Hello, thank you for replying on my talk page. It is very important to cite the statements you make in an article, rather than making readers try to research the information to verify it themselves or using external links.

See referencing for beginners for help, it is a great guide. -- NotCharizard ^🗨 14:51, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

NotCharizard, are you a human being, and if so, can you help me? I myself am Alisa Kwitney. I inserted links to the books, which list me as the editor. What else do I need to do, and how do I get to the piece so it can be included again? Vertigal (talk) 14:55, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I am a human? At least, I am fairly certain I am.

If you are Kwitney, that is very serious - please do not edit the article directly again, as you have a conflict of interest and must instead use the edit request feature. Wikipedia must not be used for self promotion.

I am going to bed now, but I will be able to respond to you again next time I am online. In the meantime, I suggest asking any questions at The Teahouse, a help forum specifically for new editors - they are friendly and very knowledgeable about Wikipedia. -- NotCharizard ^🗨 15:02, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You recently changed "passed away" to "died" at a number of articles. That's often a good thing when you're changing something written in wikivoice; it's a bad thing if you change the words of someone being quoted. One of your changes was at Multi-Edit, where you changed "passed away" to "died" within a quotation. Did you really mean to do that? Vadder (talk) 14:52, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, thank you so much for catching that! I’d been being careful to avoid changing any quotations, I think I must have not realised because it was such a long quote it seemed like normal text. I apologise. -- NotCharizard ^🗨 14:57, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 2025 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol
On 1 May 2025, a one-month backlog drive for New Pages Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each review will earn 1 point. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:26, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I was in the process of responding on the ANI when it was closed. I was writing to thank you for bringing attention to the problem. The language Cullen 328 used with me in the Teahouse was far from civil. (How can someone write, "don't you dare tell me..." and be considered civil??) Afterwards, I looked through the Talk messages and saw quite a few other people who felt he was too harsh and unpleasant. There are too many people who kowtow to long-time editors such that they become untouchable, and know it.

I came across interviews that have been done with long-time editors and was surprised by how many commented on how mean senior editors are to new editors. They even admit that they were on the receiving end when they were new, and wish they'd been kinder as seniors themselves. I also found some old data on negative feedback for new editors (Wikipedia used to track this sort of thing) and it skyrocketed a few years after the project got started. From what I've seen, the trajectory has only continued. Basically, new editors get hazed and if you're submissive and contrite, they forgive you, otherwise you're castigated and ostracized. It's like some old, boy's school club. Ghost writer's cat (talk) 06:45, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Ghost writer's cat Would you like to see the flipside of the coin? Excellent name btw. Polygnotus (talk) 14:41, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Ghost writer's cat Thank you a lot for taking the time to write this. I have noticed it as well with people who have been around for a long time, and it's very difficult to know how to conunter it. -- NotCharizard ^🗨 08:21, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Notcharizard I think the best thing is to respond with the best manners and keep all your emotions in check, but be honest. That way, no one can blame you for your behavior while the senior will look even worse. But you might still get criticized anyway. I certainly did, and I don't think I said anything out of line. Sometimes there's just no winning. Ghost writer's cat (talk) 01:22, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Notcharizard. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Peter Pracownik".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions here. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 09:27, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Notcharizard:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive in June!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 1 month of outstanding reviews from the current 3+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 June 2025 through 30 June 2025.

You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 3200 pages, so start reviewing drafts. We're looking forward to your help! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page.

Hi @Notcharizard, thanks so much for reviewing this - hugely appreciated! I've updated this based on your advice to ensure neutrality. The sources are all from major UK press outlets (but typically use Bear Grylls' name in the title to get the clicks - they aren't direct quotes from him, but from the article). I'd love any further feedback, or to have this published if you think it's good to go. Thanks again. Projectoverland (talk) 05:52, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Toy Libraries Australia, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

HerBauhaus (talk) 08:46, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there! I'm really sorry for bugging you, but you're an editor I've had a positive interaction with recently (approving Let God Sort Em Out) and I don't know the best place to go for an answer on this. Who should I contact / what should I do if there's a very high-status editor who keeps reverting my edits on a specific page while citing policies that are either unequivically irrelevant (like, literally nothing to do with what they're saying) or that they've completely misread, all while being very aggressive in their edit summaries and accusing me of being a sockpuppet? I'm the only one making substantial edits to the draft right now and it's inevitably going to be a big article. I've just deleted an entire useful section of the draft to appease them. Advice would be really appreciated. 81.105.71.37 (talk) 22:53, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think I can @ you bc you are an IP, so I'll reply on your talk page. -- NotCharizard ^🗨 05:18, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Notcharizard,

Just wanted to note on your comment you left on Draft:Stempel Schneidler where you wrote 'Unsourced sections, such as the first paragraph in Reception and all of Usage, need to be either sourced or removed.'. This is not quite true, as the article is not a WP:BLP, the 'source or remove' rule only applies to BLPs. Of course, we would like sections sourced and it would go against the author when deciding to accept or decline the draft, but the content does not need removing per se - Rich^T|C|E-Mail 05:03, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Rich Smith Hello, thank you for reminding me of this. I think my desire for everything to be cited sometimes makes me forget that it is not policy for all basic statements to not be sourced - I am not great with the grey-areas.

Do you think the information in that article describing the text could be called original research without a citation, or is the font itself enough to verify it is true? -- NotCharizard ^🗨 09:47, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, yes it could - Rich^T|C|E-Mail 11:12, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• VVanguardMusic (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Veronica Vitale (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Thank you for your detailed feedback. Below are the three best reliable, independent secondary sources that provide significant, non-trivial coverage of Veronica Vitale and support notability under Wikipedia's guidelines:

1. Billboard Italia Title: Veronica Vitale, dagli USA tra musica e attivismo. L'intervista

Publisher: Billboard Italia (an editorially independent branch of Billboard Magazine)

URL: https://billboard.it/musica/veronica-vitale-transparent-intervista/

Why it qualifies: This article offers in-depth commentary on her single Transparent, her activism, production work, and broader musical philosophy. It is independent, reliable, and provides substantive editorial content, not merely a promotional profile.

2. Corriere del Mezzogiorno (Corriere Napoli) Title: Veronica Vitale, da Boscoreale ad Hollywood: la sua musica per cambiare il mondo

Publisher: Corriere del Mezzogiorno, part of Corriere della Sera, one of Italy’s most respected national newspapers

URL: https://napoli.corriere.it/notizie/cronaca/23_novembre_28/veronica-vitale-da-boscoreale-ad-hollywood-che-storia/

Why it qualifies: This feature reports on her artistic journey, recognition by the Los Angeles City Council, and her humanitarian work. It is fully independent, non-promotional, and comes from a highly credible editorial source.

3. L’Idea Magazine Title: I wanted to build a silent ascent to legendary – An Exclusive Interview with Veronica Vitale

Publisher: L’Idea Magazine, a longstanding Italian-American cultural journal

URL: https://lideamagazine.com/i-wanted-to-build-a-silent-ascent-to-legendary-an-exclusive-interview-with-veronica-vitale/

Why it qualifies: While formatted as an interview, the piece contains editorial analysis contextualizing her significance as an artist working across continents. The publication is independent, and the article provides broad insight into her body of work and cultural role.

✅ Additional Noteworthy Coverage 1. Avvenire (Corriere della Sera group) Title: Musica. Veronica Vitale, la voce italiana scoperta dall’America Publisher: Avvenire (major national Catholic newspaper under Corriere della Sera) Date: October 21, 2021 What it covers: Offers a detailed narrative of her artistic journey—from Italy to the U.S.—and highlights her advocacy against bullying, collaborations, and major singles like Transparent. This is a substantive editorial piece from a reputable independent outlet. bookreviewsunlimited.wordpress.com +10 avvenire.it +10 lideamagazine.com +10

2. WKRC-TV (CBS affiliate, Cincinnati) Title: Uplifting the World during a Pandemic: Virtual World Choir features local musician Publisher: WKRC-TV News Date: September 23, 2020 What it covers: Profiles her Hymn to Humanity project, discussing its global reach, local impact in Cincinnati, and community participation. This is a full news feature, not self-published. local12.com

3. The Way Magazine Title: Veronica Vitale: “Gli artisti devono essere messaggeri” Publisher: The Way Magazine (Italian cultural publication) Date: Circa 2021 What it covers: Explores her role as an activist artist, noting her anti-bullying advocacy, collaborations with Italian and American creatives, and multi-genred presence. The piece offers independent commentary and analysis beyond the subject’s own portrayal.

📌 Why These Are Significant Each comes from a third-party editorial source with no affiliation to the subject.

All provide more than cursory mentions—they include profiles, context, and analysis of her work.

Together with previous sources (Billboard Italia, Corriere Naples, L’Idea Magazine), they strengthen the case for notability under WP:BIO and WP:THREE.

VVanguardMusic (talk) 15:16, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Could you check the update Let me know if this minimal but strong draft focused only on the three best sources could pass VVanguardMusic (talk) 15:35, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@VVanguardMusic I suspect you may have wrote with with an LLM because it does not make any sense. You said they are unaffiliated with the subject but then acknowledged one is an interview.

I can not talk to you through an LLM, and alternatively if these are your own answers for your best sources then you are already aware that Vitale is not notable enough for an article. -- NotCharizard ^🗨 03:13, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

How many times do I have to tell you I did not write with an LLM. I'm trying to learn and AGAIN I WAS USING chatGPT to organize and categorize my links into a list I should have checked the links for accuracy or copied the originals rather then the one chatGPT fed back to me. I would greatly appreciate someone that could actually help. I have many more sources unfortunately 75% of the mainstream journals, interviews and articles are GEOLOCKED and only accessible with a VPN or to actually be in Europe to open and view. Sorry for not being an "EXPERIENCED EDITOR" I guess I was wrong in thinking the WIKI Community would actually be helpful and welcoming in actually learning how to contribute and maybe even research a subject matter. Of course I acknowledge one of the links was an interview, I'm doing research. I'm not talking to you through an LLM Either. If someone could actually help review all the sources I have for the subject and let me know what might work to get a page started and approved it would be great. VVanguardMusic (talk) 15:07, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@VVanguardMusic Again I do not understand you - what do you mean “how many times do I have to tell you”? That message was the first time I have ever talked to you. If other people have also told you that your use of LLM to “sort links” and stuff makes it difficult to communicate with you, it is worth taking the advice seriously. We are all always learning to communicate better and it is a process of working with others.

That said, ai feel that you are taking out your frustration of the very difficult task of writing an article on people giving you genuine help, which is unfair. I can not help you if you are frustrated with me, so I do not want to help on this article anymore. Thank you. -- NotCharizard ^🗨 10:16, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) the weird graphics you have used above are exactly what ChatGPT does, we don't like editors using an LLM. You have an interview and a YouTube source neither of which are reliable sources and another source which is a 404 error. Theroadislong (talk) 15:55, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That'

s because stupidly I was using chatgpt to organize my links as I already stated please check the draft I got it you need to keep telling me the same thing I made a beginner mistake it wont happen again. I finally gpot the real sources to work and have a new draft going can you please take a look before i keep moving forward I have over 250 references (News articles tv appearances on major networks and much more) VVanguardMusic (talk) 18:12, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dear [Notcharizard], I've revised the links. The article Draft:Mila_Born is now much better documented. I've also included a talk article for you. Could you please take another look at it? I didn't understand your suggestion. Do I need to translate all the links into English for relevance? Regards. Gernundvielleser (talk) 06:49, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Gernundvielleser Thank you for working on the article. I did not say anything about translating the links, so I am not sure what you mean by that. Either way, someone will review the improved article in time :) -- NotCharizard ^🗨 02:43, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Russ the Story Bus, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 07:53, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Reading Beans Wow, that was so fast! Thanks so much! -- NotCharizard ^🗨 09:27, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm just sending you an FYI that I modified the message you left on this user's talk page and fixed a typo for you. I usually never modify any discussion messages left by other editors on any talk pages or discussion boards, but I thought that fixing this was harmless enough. If you object, you're welcome to revert the change. :-) Cheers - ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 08:42, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Oshwah Thank you and thank you for letting me know! -- NotCharizard ^🗨 08:45, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Of course. Giving you a courtesy message is the least I can do. Until we meet again... ;-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 09:24, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

You recently reverted my edit for the cover artist of Uncanny Stories, saying the external link was inappropriate. However, when removing the link, you also reverted the artist's name to the incorrect artist. Would you mind putting J.W. Scott back as the artist?

Thanks 2600:4040:B69B:F600:7DEA:773F:D978:1D8B (talk) 13:37, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that - will do, thank you for letting me know! -- NotCharizard ^🗨 13:42, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there - I redited the page and included links, citations etc. 86.27.203.42 (talk) 12:03, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

~ ToBeFree (talk) 14:26, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I see you are following the Hottest 100. I just want to say thanks and cheers, and I hope you are enjoying it. I'm expecting INSX art #1 ... 09:59, 26 July 2025 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.206.69.234 (talk)

Nice one on your guess with INXS! Yeah, it was fun to read a bit about the songs that made it on Wikipedia, I was not born here so I did not know a bunch of the older songs :) -- NotCharizard ^🗨 10:05, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Where is 'here'...? 😉 Laurier (xe or they) (talk) 10:54, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Laurier Australia? The comment was in response to a discussion of a list of Australian songs. -- NotCharizard ^🗨 11:07, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ah! Okay! I didn't notice, I'm sorry. Laurier (xe or they) (talk) 11:25, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Blackfrost: The Long Dark 2, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 22% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

qcne (talk) 15:43, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @Qcne! I have informed the original creator of the draft as well, as my additions were mostly just adding stronger sources. -- NotCharizard ^🗨 15:54, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ah yes - it defaults to pinging you. Sorry bout that. qcne (talk) 15:58, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No that is okay! I was happy to know :D -- NotCharizard ^🗨 15:59, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you revert this edit? [1]

Its covered by WP:ARBECR, A.1 says talk page edits aren't allowed by non WP:XC editors except as formatted edit requests, and D says that anyone may remove such edits to enforce the restriction. Bluethricecreamman (talk) 19:44, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Bluethricecreamman Sorry, that's so weird, I remember seeing that edit because I remember I I clicked on the link to read WP:ARBERCR, but I don't remember reverting it? My apologies. -- NotCharizard ^🗨 20:18, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

no problem. just checking. Bluethricecreamman (talk) 20:21, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Notcharizard. Thank you very much for your comment ([[2]]. Now I've added sources wherever possible. No, the text is entirely my own — all the information is verifiable in the cited sources. There are not any hallucinations. I only used an LLM to correct my English. Apparently, that made it even worse :) If you could help edit it for syntax and style, I would be truly grateful! Astra Amanda (talk) 21:01, 7 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Astra Amanda If you ask an LLM to rewrite something just improving grammar, it can still add odd things without you noticing, so it is best to use something that gives you specific suggestions instead that you can then change yourself. The very first section of the draft says "a life-changing event that deeply influenced his path" which is not an appropriate tone for an encyclopedia. I am not really interested in editing the draft myself, as it is not a topic I am interested in. But good luck. -- NotCharizard ^🗨 10:17, 8 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am autistic too, and have trouble understanding things too. I also have trouble connecting with other people. ~Rafael! (He, him) • talk • guestbook • projects 17:27, 8 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I think I have seen you around at the Teahouse! I am much better than I used to be at communicating with allistic people “face-to-face” but it is definitely a lot harder with people you do not know and only written text! -- NotCharizard ^🗨 01:41, 9 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

forgot to @Rafaelthegreat you -- NotCharizard ^🗨 01:44, 9 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's okay but thanks ~Rafael! (He, him) • talk • guestbook • projects 14:31, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

September 2025 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol
On 1 September 2025, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each review will earn 1 point. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:32, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kovcszaln6 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

See WP:1E.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Marshall Mabey and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Kovcszaln6 (talk) 11:45, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Notcharizard! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Kovcszaln6 (talk) 11:45, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

1916 East River tunnel blowout, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Kovcszaln6 (talk) 14:30, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Kovcszaln6 Thank you!! -- NotCharizard ^🗨 14:36, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Notcharizard. Per your request, your account has been granted temporary-account-viewer rights. You are now able to reveal the IP addresses of individuals using temporary accounts that are not visible to the general public. This is very sensitive information that is only to be used to aid in anti-abuse workflows. Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:Temporary account IP viewer for more information on this user right. It is important to remember:

• You must not share IP address data with someone who does not have the same access permissions unless disclosure is permissible as per guidelines listed at Foundation:Policy:Wikimedia Access to Temporary Account IP Addresses Policy.
• Access must not be used for political control, to apply pressure on editors, or as a threat against another editor in a content dispute. There must be a valid reason to investigate a temporary user. Note that using multiple temporary accounts is not forbidden, so long as they are not used in violation of policies (for example, block or ban evasion).

It is also important to note that the following actions are logged for others to see:

• When a user accepts the preference that enables or disables IP reveal for their account.
• Revealing an IP address of a temporary account.
• Listing the temporary accounts that are associated with an IP address or CIDR range.

Remember, even if a user is violating policy, avoid revealing personal information if possible. Use temporary account usernames rather than disclosing IP addresses directly, or give information such as same network/not same network or similar. If you do not want the user right anymore then please ask me or another administrator and it will be removed for you. You may also voluntarily give up access at any time by visiting Special:Preferences. Happy editing! Extraordinary Writ (talk) 22:00, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Rubis (sheep). Thanks! Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 18:43, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Rubis (sheep), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 18:44, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Queens Wharf Tower, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 18:23, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Loop Earplugs, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Scaledish! Talkish? Statish. 17:49, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]