User talk:Notcharizard/archive 1

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:

• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• Simplified Manual of Style

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Grey's Anatomy: The Video Game. Thanks! eviolite (talk) 01:41, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! I really appreciate the help :) ☽☆ NotCharizard (talk) 01:59, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Grey's Anatomy: The Video Game, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 11:42, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nonmanual features (linguistics), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Rusalkii (talk) 14:24, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the article! I saw that you split it off from the main linguistics article, which is great, but right now it's not a substantial expansion on the original? Are you planning on adding to it further? Rusalkii (talk) 14:25, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I am happy to expand on it more. I will have to do a bit of reviewing first though as it's been a bit since I've done semantics research but I'll try and work on this week in between uni work. Thank you for your comments. -- ☽☆ NotCharizard (talk) 14:33, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent, thank you! It's an interesting topic and one I know very little about, or I'd have taken a stab at it myself -- I'm glad to have someone who knows the area on it. Rusalkii (talk) 14:36, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Notcharizard! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Completely restarting someone elses draft?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Notcharizard! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 20:10, Monday, April 4, 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Skywatcher68. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. –Skywatcher68 (talk) 15:46, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies, that was very much accidental - I am a bit confused though, which part was not npov? -- ☽☆ NotCharizard (talk) 15:48, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:BitLife. Thanks! Noahfgodard (talk) 16:30, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I really appreciate your feedback! -- ☽☆ NotCharizard (talk) 17:04, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Draft:BitLife, I was going to review it (after seeing messages about it on your talk page) but I'm not so sure about it's notability. Think there is clearly one reliable source that gives significant coverage but not sure if there is a second. Pinging Noahfgodard who thought there was evidence of notability for their opinion. I've changed some parts of the reception section because the sources cited is user generated, feel free to revert if you think I've made a mistake there. Thanks and happy editing! Justiyaya 08:44, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your feedback! I see that I'd forgot to remove of the Twitter citations from the last version, thank you for catching that. The Metacritic rating was on their based on WikiProject Video Games sources advice and I have read that another article "failed the Metacritic test" in regards to notibility, so I think Metacritic is decent. I'll wait for Noah's opinion before I revert anything though as I trust both your opinions as more experienced editors. -- ☽☆ NotCharizard (talk) 13:44, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a bit conflicted on this one. I think the sources could be improved to build a stronger argument for notability, but given that the game was such an enormous hit (over 1.4 million reviews on the Apple Store, for example), I'd be very surprised if reliable sources didn't exist anywhere. --Noahfgodard (talk) 16:09, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I stuck to using the the WikiProject's custom google search engine to find sources for the article, I can try and find more using other websites but I'll have to check the reliability of each myself so it will take me a little bit. I'm still learning about what counts as reliable outside of academic journals (thankfully wikipedia has a lot of resources, but sometimes it can be tricky with specific sites). -- ☽☆ NotCharizard (talk) 16:20, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Recommend installing User:Novem Linguae/Scripts/CiteHighlighter (or similar alternatives) for casual browsing (using WP for research) and editing. It might help with determining reliability. Justiyaya 16:47, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh that looks super handy, thank you! -- ☽☆ NotCharizard (talk) 18:08, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited James Acaster, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Crystal Palace.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How amazing. If that is true, it is tragic and ridiculous in equal degree. I think that might be an ideal candidate for WP:Did you know on the Main page. Martinevans123 (talk) 09:22, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for suggesting that! I'll have read of the nomination page. -- NotCharizard ^🗨 09:28, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Surprisingly I do not have a copy of Svenska Numismatiska Föreningen from 2015 to hand. But your online link to page 87 of Hodges (2021) doesn't seem to connect properly - it shows me page 57? I do hope this is not an elaborate Swedish hoax! Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 09:30, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, which online link? Svenska Numismatiska Föreningen is the link of the publisher, the book is titled A tale of buried treasure, some good estimations, and golden unicorns – The numismatic connections of Alan Turing I hope I didn't cite it wrong. I've found an accesible version here (https://www.academia.edu/13683478/A_tale_of_buried_treasure_some_good_estimations_and_golden_unicorns_The_numismatic_connections_of_Alan_Turing), which I'll to the article as well. -- NotCharizard ^🗨 09:41, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's the link to page 87 of Hodges (2021) - I get page 57 instead. Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 09:51, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I see, my apologies, I'd reused a citation of the same book as it was already cited in the article, not realising the other citation had a page number attached. Sorry about that - I've fixed it now. I've also checked the criteria for DYK and unfortunately it's not applicable because an article needs to have been, within the last seven days, created, moved to good article status, or expanded five-fold. -- NotCharizard ^🗨 10:07, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for that. I hope you are happy with my other changes there. Too bad about DYK, as I still think this factoid is deeply ironic. Martinevans123 (talk) 10:44, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What's the factoid? Ascendingrisingharmonising (talk) 10:05, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's the section at Alan_Turing#Treasure:

In the 1940s, Turing became worried about losing his savings in the event of a German invasion. In order to protect it, he bought two silver bars weighing 3,200 oz (90 kg) and worth £250 (equivalent to over £8,000 in 2022) and buried them in forest which is now Bletchley Park. Upon returning to dig them up, Turing found that he was unable to break his own code describing where exactly he had hidden them. This, along with the fact that the area had been renovated, meant that he never regained the silver.

-- NotCharizard ^🗨 10:12, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Ascendingrisingharmonising (talk) 10:14, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you have put an advertisement tag on the article Constantin Bisanz. I, as a creator of the article, am curious to know what exactly the words or phrases are that you have found advertising. Would you please care to mention, so I can be able to remove them. Thanks. Insight 3 (talk) 16:07, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In general the article just reads as a list of his acocmplishments rather than an encyclopedia entry. I am not sure what would be the best way to improve it, which is why I tagged it rather than make an attempt myself. -- NotCharizard ^🗨 05:51, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The available sources only talk about his accomplishments, nothing much about his personal life and other activities, so there is no way to avoid it. I just picked him from Requested articles Austria. I try to reedit and remove some phrases that may give impression of advertisement. Thanks for you feedback. Insight 3 (talk) 08:45, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That's fair, if you believe I've made a mistake you're welcome to remove the maintanence tag, I'm still somewhat new to editing. Cheers for your politeness. -- NotCharizard ^🗨 08:50, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I was wondering if I could make a whole lot of these userboxes for different timezones, using your same format and crediting you in their reproductions on my page. There is an example of what I want to do here, where I converted your userbox to my local timezone, Australian Central Standard Time, here. Cheers - SabreOnYouTube (talk) 17:26, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes that’s absolutely fine! It’s a very simple design so there’s no need to credit me, although I do appreciate that you asked. -- NotCharizard ^🗨 04:31, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Steven Universe: Unleash The Light, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 13:47, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
134		Swing bowling (talk)	Add sources
206		Biwi Ho To Aisi (talk)	Add sources
20		Simultaneous communication (talk)	Add sources
98		Ataru Moroboshi (talk)	Add sources
1,375		Startup company (talk)	Add sources
5		You (South African magazine) (talk)	Add sources
920		Cryptocurrency exchange (talk)	Cleanup
314		Annamalai University (talk)	Cleanup
228		Cryptocurrency and crime (talk)	Cleanup
10		Heinz Billing (talk)	Expand
2,729		Autism spectrum (talk)	Expand
440		Mirror neuron (talk)	Expand
212		Criminal tattoo (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
55		Timeline of Internet conflicts (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
34		Timeline of binary prefixes (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
1,758		Neurodiversity (talk)	Merge
372		Springer Nature (talk)	Merge
328		Neurotypical (talk)	Merge
193		Trae tha Truth (talk)	Wikify
103		Automatic Computing Engine (talk)	Wikify
3,791		Pete Holmes (talk)	Wikify
1,181		Stew Peters (talk)	Orphan
10		Christopher Muhr (talk)	Orphan
2		Sociabl (talk)	Orphan
192		Hamstringing (talk)	Stub
14		Initialized sign (talk)	Stub
54		C. Sathya (talk)	Stub
7		1,227 QI Facts to Blow Your Socks Off (talk)	Stub
6		River Wreake (talk)	Stub
19		Groote Kerk, Cape Town (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 18:42, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Notcharizard,

With reference to: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wheels_of_Fire

I am not proficient in editing Wiki pages, nor am i a certification authority, but i would thank you, (who seems to be proficient) to correct wild and blatantly obvious self contradicting claims when attention is drawn to them, instead of merely reverting back to a bunch of baloney. I actually bought the Wheels of Fire double album (vinyl) in 1968, have always enjoyed it, (especially side 3) and still have it. There have been a few re-issues since, but the statement "... becoming the world's first platinum-selling double album." is factually incorrect. The evidence for that is self contained near the bottom of the very same page in question. Please refer to it under the heading, "Charts and certifications" within the table under the heading on the right, "Certifications". I really hope that you see it fit to reinstate the United States as a Region of the World and realize that all that glitters is not platinum, but might very well be fraudulent hype in an industry that makes settlement claims worth billions annually.

https://www.riaa.com/gold-platinum/?tab_active=default-award&se=WHEELS+OF+FIRE#search_section

...makes it only a gold disk award in the US, which like it or not is an important Region of the world, and provides irrefutable proof that the claim.

"... becoming the world's first platinum-selling double album." is false.

Unfortunately i have no idea why "Wheels of Fire" will not come up in a search either for it, or for "Cream" here...

https://www.bpi.co.uk/brit-certified/

..i guess it might be possible that Cream and it's sales are under a tally review for re-issues, digital purchases and streaming downloads. As a bit of a conspiracy theorist, i would propose that it was to try and help Eric with the cost of his vax injuries. Still, and as much as i would like "the world's first platinum-selling double album." to be true for "Wheels of Fire", it never has been and i doubt it ever will be.

Apparently, although Classical music came in boxed sets and volumes ages ago, it has been said that the first double album to have ever been printed under the book cover type concept we know, was that of Bob Dylan’s Blonde on Blonde, released on June 20, 1966. Doing some enquiry at the two above certification authorities, suggests that Blonde on Blonde might possibly hold both claims i.e. the first printed, as well as the first platinum-selling double album. However, because the platinum certification status dates CERTIFIED 22.07.2013 and RELEASED 29.03.2004 are given at the BPI, it suggests that perhaps the inclusion of a re-issue may have taken it to the point of a "world's" platinum, but that might also still not mean that it was the "first". The certifications on the Blond on Blond Wiki page are not too much help either, because according to WBM Archive page captures it was only inserted into the Wiki page at some point during the early half of 2018. Another problem is that although the BPI was founded in 1973, an award system was only established in 1977, which until July 2013 was based on the level of shipments by record labels to retailers.

Have a nice what's left of the day,

Boxy — Preceding unsigned comment added by Boxw (talk • contribs) 13:59, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, unfortunately I've never listened to the album and don't know anything about it, the band, or it's members. I did not read the full article at the time, as at the time I was only patrolling recent changes articles which had been tagged by a bot as being potentially problematic, and the edit I reverted (I think you're reffering to this one?) I simply undid as a single edit because it read to me as patent nonsense. If I were to read the entire article of each edit a bot marked for me, I'd only get a few edits done a day. If you've seen some things in the article that you think are wrong, I encourage you to have a go and edit it yourself - have a look at getting started if you need help, or post a message on Wheel's of Fire's talk page where someone more familair with the topic might be able to help you. Happy editing and I hope you also have a nice day! -- NotCharizard ^🗨 15:09, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi NotCharizard, would suggest that you respond to the comments posted on the rfp thread if you were not aware of them :D Justiyaya 14:03, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I did miss that, I must remember to add such pages to my watchlist. -- NotCharizard ^🗨 14:15, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Notcharizard. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle or RedWarn.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war.
• If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
• Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! FASTILY 10:45, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! -- NotCharizard ^🗨 11:40, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		You've been doing a fantastic job of helping to clean up and deal with vandalism. Congrats on Rollback and thanks for your contributions! Hey man im josh (talk) 12:01, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ahh, thank you so much! This made me smile very big! ♥ -- NotCharizard ^🗨 13:27, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know why you rolled it back. I'm guessing that you didn't read the note. I unrolled it back. "Fixing spelling error. Someone reverted it. This is not an obscenity. It's a Latin loan word. https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/cum : "cum Used in indicating a thing with two roles, functions, or natures, or a thing that has changed from one to another. He built a bus-cum-greenhouse that made a bold statement, but the plants in it didn't live very long." " — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.60.175.5 (talk) 22:26, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I did completely miss that and assume it was obscenity. That was fully my bad, I need to make sure to read the description for every edit better. Thank you a lot for taking the time to message and let me know! I genuinely really appreciate it, and I got to learn a bit of Latin too. -- NotCharizard ^🗨 23:28, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jesy Nelson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Boyz.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Notcharizard! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Username, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you restore this edit? It's unsourced. Friedlemon (talk) 20:54, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

... where? Not with an inline citation? -- NotCharizard ^🗨 20:56, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, there has to be an inline citation for that claim as per WP:BLP. Friedlemon (talk) 21:01, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I'm sorry, I misunderstood and thought you were asking me why I'd removed it. I'd meant to remove that edit, not restore it - someone else must've tried to at the same time and so I accidentally restored it, sorry about that. Thanks for letting me know. -- NotCharizard ^🗨 21:03, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Have removed it now :) -- NotCharizard ^🗨 21:04, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Notcharizard. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Gus Bono, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: This would appear to be within the scope of the WP:NSPORTS2022 discussion. I must admit that haven't kept up with the broader consequences, but in this individual case, it would require a notional WP:AFD/Gus Bono would be for required before outright speedy deletion, as Bono played for long-time defunct Washington Senators (1901–1960). My apologies if this is incorrect. Thank you. Shirt58 (talk) 09:57, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. -- NotCharizard ^🗨 09:58, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t understand why my edit was reverted. I changed the song titles to the exact way that they were officially released. GamerKlim9716 (talk) 15:11, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I don't think you are aware of this but there is a guideline, not many new users know it, called MOS:ALLCAPS. Specifically "reduce track titles [to title case] on albums where all or most tracks are listed in all capitals", think I might've made that mistake half a year ago when I'm still relatively new, hopefully this clears things up, happy editing. (Notcharizard, it might be better if you linked the policy in your edit summary next time :D) Justiyaya 17:48, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Notcharizard! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Question on copyrighted image policy, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Have you actually read the criteria for A7? If so can you please explain your tagging spree? PRAXIDICAE💕 03:20, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I have read it. It says that articles fit the criteria if they do not "indicate why its subject is important or significant". It also links to the page giving examples of credible claims of significance, which I did not think was shown in the articles I tagged, as it only said things like "x was a poet" or "x was a minister" which does not seem especially notable.

I saw that when you removed the speedy deletion tag, you said that it did not fit the criteria because the person had an entry in a national biographical dictionary. Thank you for specifying that in your edit summary. I did see that in the notability guidelines for people, but that section starts off with "People are likely to be notable if they meet any of the following standards. Failure to meet these criteria is not conclusive proof that a subject should not be included; conversely, meeting one or more does not guarantee that a subject should be included." so it doesn't seem to mean having an entry automatically makes a person notable.

If I have done something wrong, or misunderstood the criteria, I apologise. Could you please let me know specifically what I have made a mistake on? It is not helpful just to say "Did you actually read the criteria?" as I am not sure if you are only being rhetorical because you are frustrated. Thank you. -- NotCharizard ^🗨 03:38, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think you read it correctly because Dafydd ap Gruffydd (poet) and every single other one you tagged in the last few hours unequivocally do not meet A7. PRAXIDICAE💕 03:39, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I apologise then, I have read it over a few times and am still a bit confused as to why, but I'm still learning so I appreciate you letting me know I've misunderstood the criteria. Again, if you could explain how the articles note the peoples importance I would appreciate that, but if you're busy that is okay and I will have a tlak with my mentor about it. -- NotCharizard ^🗨 03:42, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Needs more reviews from reliable sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:BitLife and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:BitLife, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 09:44, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 331dot was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Sources are a business directory listing that just documents the existence of this organization, two sources based on interviews, and a brief mention, these things do not establish notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shit You Should Care About and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Shit You Should Care About, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be tagged for G13 deletion.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

331dot (talk) 12:59, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Notcharizard! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 331dot (talk) 12:59, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	For your efforts reverting vandalism. Firestar464 (talk) 09:45, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! You have given me a big smile!! -- NotCharizard ^🗨 10:00, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why Johnnyswartz (talk) 11:32, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please do not test edits, add jokes, or add information without reliable sources supporting them. If you want to make positive contributions to Wikipedia, please first look through our introduction then check the task center. Justiyaya 15:11, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think a source is needed in the lead if it is cited in the main body of the article, which I can only assume you didn't read. Thanks. 94.174.111.230 (talk) 13:01, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The lead needs to have citations the same as the rest - perhaps even more so, as many people who just want some basic information on Kirsty will likely only read the lead and not the rest of the article. -- NotCharizard ^🗨 10:04, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

MOS:CITELEAD isn't clear at all on this. It wavers between (a) always needed and (b) open to consensus. On that basis, I am not sure we need citations for two facts that are amply covered in the body of the article. 94.174.111.230 (talk) 11:39, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi IP, I do agree with you on your point regarding cite lead and I do agree that it is unnecessary to add inline citations. However, I do think your edit could've been made better. The word "controversial" is used only when "reliable sources establish the existence of a controversy" (per WP:CONTENTIOUS) which does not seem to be in the article. I've also removed "#" from the link to the section and removed "foundation of the". For the first change I think we usually don't use # when linking to the same article but I'm not really sure, for the second change I don't think it's necessary. If I'm wrong feel free to edit it and leave a short reply below explaining, thanks you for your contributions :D (Diff of changes) also Notcharizard pinging IPs (by linking to their username) doesn't work so best leave them a talkback instead Justiyaya 15:59, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Justiyaya: Thanks for that detailed correction. Maybe it's my inexperience here trying to get things right, and I saw it as controversial when perhaps it wasn't exactly so. 94.174.111.230 (talk) 23:41, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Notcharizard

Thank you for creating Nonmanual feature.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 12:48, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Notcharizard, Thank you for the hard work you do to keep Wikipedia a good place. I wanted to let you know that I mentioned your name as someone who reverted vandalism in a WP:ANI discussion; I did so because the vandalism doesn't seem to stop and I was hoping you could have your say about it. I am just going to copy-paste the notice below:

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. JohnnyCoal (talk) 16:15, 19 June 2022 (UTC)"}}[reply]

The same person who removed critical information from the Ocean Adventure Wikipedia page removed the info again immediately after you undid their edit. You might want to keep an eye on this page, it seems like a target for vandalism... 122.58.212.161 (talk) 07:46, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted and slightly copy edited, thank you IP for the notice :D Justiyaya 07:34, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Have a great day! :)

Hi Notcharizard, Thank you for creating a draft page about Damian Milton! I just published the page, hope that's okay. I also really like your userbox autistic. Would you mind if I copy it and use it on my userpage as well? Laurier (talk) 07:18, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Yes that is okay, and yes you are very welcome to use the userbox :) -- NotCharizard ^🗨 05:06, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New familiar have changed name back to skinny living, I attempted to edit but it keeps getting changed back. Please see Facebook page. 90.253.33.86 (talk) 08:51, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for letting me know this! I suspect the reason it's being changed is because you're only changing the name in the text in the article - due to the new name, the page title needs to be changed by moving the page. I'll move the page and then your edits should stay :) -- NotCharizard ^🗨 09:04, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm the band's new manager. I just edited the page but changes were undone by another editor. We'd appreciate your help with this! Martamartinezh (talk) 14:44, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
  

Femke (talk) 15:59, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! -- NotCharizard ^🗨 09:24, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Notcharizard. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Little mouse's encyclopedia, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:03, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Notcharizard. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Authority of the bootmaker, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Notcharizard. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Little mouse's encyclopedia".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:29, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tag (graffiti), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 12:49, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

	The Editor's Barnstar
	For boldly chainsawing the living shit out of the disaster zone that was COVID-19 pandemic in New South Wales. Excellent work. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 01:08, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much!! Also using "chainsawing" to mean heavily editing is absolutely beautiful. -- NotCharizard ^🗨 11:11, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sometimes more is less, and sometimes, we have to get there with editorial violence :P ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:19, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Notcharizard. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Shit You Should Care About, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:05, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello… Trying to add Production Deskgn credits for the feature films I designed. My credit name appears individually like the director, cinematographer, producer(s) etc… please allow the corrections. It’s an important credit in all film making. Thank you. Owlvis (talk) 17:03, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Generally editing Wikipedia articles about yourself is frowned upon as you have a conflict of interest. However, if you have a verified source online showing proof that you were involved in the film, your edit may stay on the page. -- NotCharizard ^🗨 17:08, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for fixing the problem with the two pages on the Aquitania. I just made a mistake while editing my article and didn't know how to fix it. Although I am new on Wikipedia, I already have a lot of knowledge on how it works, but I'm far from an expert. Again, thank you very much! Ale.ch.geor (talk) 15:07, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That's all good! Thanks so much for reaching out :D -- NotCharizard ^🗨 15:36, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the kind reply. :) Ale.ch.geor (talk) 11:15, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Here you restored a death hoax. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:10, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I'd tried to undo the hoax. Must have done it at the same time as someone else and undone the undo! Cheers for letting me know. -- NotCharizard ^🗨 15:26, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I see you removed the link I just added. I think the link is appropriate because GlobalMeet.com represents the product that Mr Jones created. Therefore, it is not misleading- it would give the readers the ability to see what the product looks like currently. GlobalMeet Frank (talk) 14:19, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:EL :) -- NotCharizard ^🗨 14:21, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How is it inappropriate to include what Tom House is doing now? Mustard is a legitimate website, and has been written about by many news outlets.

Tom is the founder: https://teammstrd.com/tom-house/

New York Times article: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/05/09/sports/baseball/tom-house-mustard.html Linds8chocolate (talk) 15:38, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't matter, external links are not appropriate in the body of an article. Read external links for more info. -- NotCharizard ^🗨 15:40, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fine, I left out the link. Linds8chocolate (talk) 15:44, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, Linds8chocolate, I've reverted the edit again due to significant issues surrounding verifiability (all information must be supported by a reliable source here) and the edit not having a neutral encyclopedic tone. Justiyaya 05:28, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I just went to edit and change the information with more recent sources and you immediately revert it back, with data from over 12 years ago. And overall the article has a lot of information which is extremely outdated and makes zero sense in 2023. It seems like it's aimed towards hurting Bulgaria's image. 79.100.156.89 (talk) 10:07, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not Bulgarian, and I definitely have nothing against Bulgaria (you guys have some amazing street art). The issue was that your new info didn't include any references, so it was undone. You can redo it with a reference to the statistics you mentioned and it'll stay up! I highly encourage you to update the article if you think it's outdated or bias, just make sure you always reference any statements you make :) -- NotCharizard ^🗨 10:11, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]