Welcome, friend! Here are some things to know:

Welcome to IgnatiusofLondon's talk page. I will generally respond here to comments that are posted here, rather than replying via your talk page (or the article's talk page, if you are writing to me here about an article), so you may want to watch this page until you are responded to, or let me know where specifically you'd prefer the reply. This user does not mind criticism. Feel free to let him know if he did something wrong. IgnatiusofLondon is taking a semi-wikibreak and will fully return to Wikipedia later. Archives: 1

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
1,478		Our Lady of Fátima (talk)	Add sources
435		Software framework (talk)	Add sources
218		Alexandru Ioan Cuza (talk)	Add sources
20		Italy–San Marino relations (talk)	Add sources
1,688		Babe Ruth's called shot (talk)	Add sources
53		Career assessment (talk)	Add sources
201		Peasant foods (talk)	Cleanup
178		Highgate School (talk)	Cleanup
8		Strait of Messina metropolitan area (talk)	Cleanup
86		Fano (talk)	Expand
213		Zeppola (talk)	Expand
1,020		Ukrainians (talk)	Expand
173		Neapolitan cuisine (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
114		Piazza Fontana bombing (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
103		Multiple unit (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
485		Comune (talk)	Merge
12		The Woman Who Rides Like a Man (talk)	Merge
4		Victory (volcano) (talk)	Merge
38		Gavins Point Dam (talk)	Wikify
83		2023–24 Campionato Sammarinese di Calcio (talk)	Wikify
3		Ernesto Daquanno (talk)	Wikify
2		Charles L. Biedenbach (talk)	Orphan
3		Adeeng, Uttar Pradesh (talk)	Orphan
2		Clan Softball Club (talk)	Orphan
7		Guillermo Lovell (talk)	Stub
30		San Leo (talk)	Stub
27		Dan Collins (journalist) (talk)	Stub
27		Santarcangelo di Romagna (talk)	Stub
2		Nat Krinsky (talk)	Stub
8		Sant'Agata Feltria (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:38, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240904133800","author":"SuggestBot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-SuggestBot-20240904133800-Articles_you_might_like_to_edit,_from_SuggestBot","replies":[]}}-->

Well I have also significantly contributed to the Where is Kate? article. I still did not receive a talk page notice from you as you have done with other editors regarding the AfD. Just to let you know that should the article be retained, I would like to discuss a good number of changes related to the citation parameters used in the article's source as well as the article's prose. Looking forward to our future collaborations and a positive response from you. Regards MSincccc (talk) 11:48, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240401114800","author":"MSincccc","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MSincccc-20240401114800-Request","replies":["c-IgnatiusofLondon-20240401120400-MSincccc-20240401114800"]}}-->

Hi, I didn't leave a notification on your talkpage because I remembered that you had already contributed to the new AfD, and were therefore aware of its existence. IgnatiusofLondon (he/him • ☎️) 12:04, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240401120400","author":"IgnatiusofLondon","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-IgnatiusofLondon-20240401120400-MSincccc-20240401114800","replies":[]}}-->

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2024).

Administrator changes

• Kbdank71
• Kosack
• NrDg
• TLSuda

Guideline and policy news

• An RfC is open to convert all current and future community discretionary sanctions to (community designated) contentious topics procedure.

Technical news

• The Toolforge Grid Engine services have been shut down after the final migration process from Grid Engine to Kubernetes. (T313405)

Arbitration

• An arbitration case has been opened to look into "the intersection of managing conflict of interest editing with the harassment (outing) policy".

Miscellaneous

• Editors are invited to sign up for The Core Contest, an initiative running from April 15 to May 31, which aims to improve vital and other core articles on Wikipedia.

Hello, IgnatiusofLondon,

I thought you did a great job summarizing the odyssey of this article in your deletion statement. It especially holds weight as you are not only the nominator but the creator of the article.

I'd just like to make one suggestion to you. I see valid arguments on all sides of this discussion (Delete, Keep, Redirect, Merge and even Move) but the only consensus I see right now is that editors are tired of the discussion about this article. I think if just one of our regular closers closed this discussion in a week, no matter what the resulting closure was, it would be going back to another Deletion review. So, just to encourage a thoughtful consideration of editors' opinion and avoid another deletion review, I think it would be a good idea to go to WP:AN and suggest that there be a panel of three admins to handle the closure of this discussion. This is not uncommon with contentious discussions like this one has become. There are a few good reasons for doing this, having a trio of admins make this decision usually results in admins who are not regular closers to participate in the review and I think it would help to get some fresh perspective handling this closure rather than one of the few regular closers we have (which includes me!). Also, a panel decision is more likely to "stick" and not be contested because a group of admins usually presents a very understandable and coherent closure statement. Luckily, you just started this AFD the other day so there is almost a week to find three admins who have been uninvolved with any of the prior discussions. What do you think? Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:41, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240402034100","author":"Liz","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Liz-20240402034100-Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion\/Where_is_Kate?_(3rd_nomination)","replies":["c-IgnatiusofLondon-20240402103000-Liz-20240402034100"]}}-->

Hi Liz, thank you for your message and kind words. I think this is an inspired suggestion that absolutely should be taken up for the reasons you cite; I will leave a message on the noticeboard now. Fingers-crossed we can find three admins! IgnatiusofLondon (he/him • ☎️) 10:30, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240402103000","author":"IgnatiusofLondon","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-IgnatiusofLondon-20240402103000-Liz-20240402034100","replies":[]}}-->

Hello IgnatiusofLondon,

Backlog update: The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to Schminnte, who led with over 2,300 points.

Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive.

Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the May backlog drive planning discussion.

It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated!

2023 Awards

Onel5969 won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar. Hey man im josh led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing!

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers deployed the rewritten NewPagesFeed in October, and then gave the NewPagesFeed a slight visual facelift in November. This concludes most major work to Special:NewPagesFeed, and most major work by the WMF Moderator Tools team, who wrapped up their major work on PageTriage in October. The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers will continue small work on PageTriage as time permits.

Recruitment: A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited.

Reviewing tip: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated NPP Browser tool.

Reminders:

• You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Pages Patrol Discord.
• Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
• To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:27, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240402162700","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20240402162700-New_Pages_Patrol_newsletter_April_2024","replies":[]}}-->

The Barnstar of Diplomacy

Hey IgnatiusofLondon, while we don't see eye-to-eye on the ongoing deletion discussion, I wanted to acknowledge the sheer amount of work and diligence you've put into the thorough nomination and deletion rationale and commend you on your outstanding work in every step along the way. You've made great efforts to ensure your policy-based arguments are factual and grounded and acknowledged the limitations thereof, which always (in my opinion) strengthen the overall quality of the argument. As a diligent writer and editor, Wikipedia is better for having you around. microbiologyMarcus [petri dish·growths] 16:56, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240402165600","author":"MicrobiologyMarcus","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MicrobiologyMarcus-20240402165600-A_barnstar_for_you!","replies":["c-MicrobiologyMarcus-20240402165800-MicrobiologyMarcus-20240402165600"]}}-->

I gather from your recent writings that the whole ordeal has taken a tole on you, so I just wanted to let you know you're supported and, regardless of the outcome, your work is greatly appreciate! Look forward to seeing you around on the project! Cheers, microbiologyMarcus ^{[petri dish·growths]} 16:58, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240402165800","author":"MicrobiologyMarcus","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-MicrobiologyMarcus-20240402165800-MicrobiologyMarcus-20240402165600","replies":["c-IgnatiusofLondon-20240402171300-MicrobiologyMarcus-20240402165800","c-TheSpacebook-20240402184500-MicrobiologyMarcus-20240402165800"]}}-->

Thank you so much, MicrobiologyMarcus: my editorial confidence having taken quite a knock in the last few weeks, this really means more to me than you might think, and I am very grateful for your kind and supportive words, as I was also very grateful for your thoughtful and considered contributions to the AfDs and DRV. I look forward to the ordeal being over, one way or another, and being able to display this shiny barnstar on my userpage :)) IgnatiusofLondon (he/him • ☎️) 17:13, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240402171300","author":"IgnatiusofLondon","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-IgnatiusofLondon-20240402171300-MicrobiologyMarcus-20240402165800","replies":[]}}-->

I second this. As reflected in the barnstar I gave them, it’s clear to see Ignatius is an outstanding editor shown by the well written, policy based arguments they consistently put forward, and engagement with other editors. An asset to the whole encyclopedia. TheSpacebook (talk) 18:45, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240402184500","author":"TheSpacebook","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-TheSpacebook-20240402184500-MicrobiologyMarcus-20240402165800","replies":[]}}-->

I trust there are no ill feelings toward me. I've made every effort to remain neutral in all my responses to you (and others). I've never intentionally caused harm or hurt anyone's feelings, and I hope you're doing well both mentally and physically. By the way, did you only recently become acquainted with the British royal family? Creating the entire article was quite a substantial task, not to mention the additional time spent on its improvement and the deletion reviews and AfDs. I look forward to our future collaborations. Regards and faithfully yours, MSincccc (talk) 06:14, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240403061400","author":"MSincccc","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MSincccc-20240403061400-Hello","replies":["c-IgnatiusofLondon-20240403092200-MSincccc-20240403061400"]}}-->

Hi MSincccc, no ill feelings at all, and I'm sorry if I've said or done anything to suggest otherwise. Thank you for your kindness and concern. It's a pity my userpage is temporarily usurped by the fiasco, given that it is a helpful introduction to me, but I don't have an editorial interest in the British royal family and do not expect to be editing in this topic area in the future. IgnatiusofLondon (he/him • ☎️) 09:22, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240403092200","author":"IgnatiusofLondon","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-IgnatiusofLondon-20240403092200-MSincccc-20240403061400","replies":["c-MSincccc-20240403130900-IgnatiusofLondon-20240403092200"]}}-->

Would you be open to collaborating on another article from the ground up? We could strive to achieve GA and FA status with it. If you're agreeable to the idea, we could start working on it soon. What do you think? But it should be backed up by reliable sources and not be speculative like Where is Kate? Regards MSincccc (talk) 13:09, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240403130900","author":"MSincccc","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-MSincccc-20240403130900-IgnatiusofLondon-20240403092200","replies":["c-IgnatiusofLondon-20240403140100-MSincccc-20240403130900"]}}-->

This is a kind and thoughtful invitation, but as I say, I don't really have much of an interest in this topic area. Most of my contributions concern other topics, principally relating to Rimini and San Marino. It's fairly rare for me to venture into other pastures, and even then, I tend to stick to less-traversed articles. So Where is Kate? has been an extraordinary venture, in all meanings of that word, of my Wikipedia hobby so far. I've also never been involved in the GA/FA process, and that's partly by choice, knowing that those projects tend to have quite large backlogs, and partly by consequence of the context of my topic areas. So, while the invitation is kind and I hope there will be some intersection of our interests that will lead us to collaborate in the future, let's see how things go. And to be quite honest, once the future of Where is Kate? is certain, I'm very much looking forward to spending a good few days or weeks off-wiki :)) but thank you once again, and I do look forward to collaborating in the future. IgnatiusofLondon (he/him • ☎️) 14:01, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240403140100","author":"IgnatiusofLondon","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-IgnatiusofLondon-20240403140100-MSincccc-20240403130900","replies":["c-MSincccc-20240403171000-IgnatiusofLondon-20240403140100"]}}-->

@IgnatiusofLondon Are you a Londoner by the way as your username would suggest and is Ignatius your real name?

As far as collaborating is concerned, I am ready to work on any decent, not mature article suitable for a pre-teen as long as I have a good partner to work with. Regards and faithfully yours, MSincccc (talk) 17:10, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240403171000","author":"MSincccc","type":"comment","level":5,"id":"c-MSincccc-20240403171000-IgnatiusofLondon-20240403140100","replies":["c-IgnatiusofLondon-20240403202600-MSincccc-20240403171000"]}}-->

Thanks. I am a Londoner, and no comment on my real name to protect my identity :)) IgnatiusofLondon (he/him • ☎️) 20:26, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240403202600","author":"IgnatiusofLondon","type":"comment","level":6,"id":"c-IgnatiusofLondon-20240403202600-MSincccc-20240403171000","replies":["c-MSincccc-20240404053000-IgnatiusofLondon-20240403202600"]}}-->

I would collaborate on any decent article if you are not averse to the proposal. Looking forward to knowing from you. Regards MSincccc (talk) 05:30, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240404053000","author":"MSincccc","type":"comment","level":7,"id":"c-MSincccc-20240404053000-IgnatiusofLondon-20240403202600","replies":[]}}-->

What I hope to draw your attention to on the Chinese WP involves two public figure pages and one list page: Tong Liya (a famous Chinese actress), Shen Haixiong (the head of the China Media Group, a state-run media company) and controversies around China Central Television. I'll make a hyperlink in my reply in the AfD. (No idea whether Google translate from Chinese to English is accurate enough but anyway...)

• Summary: Tong divorced in May 2021 and the spread of the news was restricted by Weibo (allegedly because the authorities were promoting a “cooling-off period before divorce” policy at that time). Later in December it was rumored that she remarried Shen (certainly of political scandal nature). The allegation was immediately wiped off from all Chinese social platforms, and soon the Beijing police arrested three suspects for false statements. Tong’s agent declared she was still single.
• My opinion: On the Chinese WP, info around the controversy was scattered in the three above mentioned pages. It’s a typical case of a conspiracy theory that vanished quickly: it involved only two public figures, and lasted for only a few days (since the authorities immediately cracked down on it), and was only another humble page of censorship history within China. But Kate’s story is obviously far more complicated: it started from her months long of public absence, and the public opinion finally exploded with the Kensington's disastrous photoshoped post, and it lasted for more time (though it admittedly also died within weeks) and made headline story globally (from MP Galloway to Stephen Colbert, from never complain never explain to Russian cyberwarfare) Now it is definitely more than a humble page of "British monarchy's public image history"; if we break all these things into pieces, then search time for a reader interested in the whole Gate will be multiplied. That is what I refer to as "compilation value", i.e. value as a standalone story. That is where I find a distinction between Kate's case and other frenzies.

Jason211pacem (talk) 18:21, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240403182100","author":"Jason211pacem","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Jason211pacem-20240403182100-Reference_case_for_Where's_Kate_discussion","replies":["c-IgnatiusofLondon-20240403202500-Jason211pacem-20240403182100"]}}-->

Hi @Jason211pacem, thanks for taking the time to compile this interesting and relevant analogy. I think the treatment that this case receives across the three articles is comparable to what I think the long-term encyclopaedic coverage of Where is Kate? should be. A complication here is that most of the information appears to be at Tong Liya's biography, rather than Shen Haixiong's (which on the one hand might make some sense given it was her alleged remarriage that was at the heart of the controversy, but on the other hand, editors reading Shen Haixiong are not readily directed to learn more at Tong Liya's article). Meanwhile, the entry at Controversies related to China Central Television seems strange to me, given that China Central Television doesn't seem to have that much relevance to the controversy except by virtue of Shen Haixiong's position.

Instead, in Where is Kate?'s case, Catherine, Princess of Wales serves as a fairly natural article to host the relevant information about the circumstances which caused the speculation, and a subsection on her health will likely include one or two additional sentences of context that can make Catherine, Princess of Wales#Health a natural Further information or See also target in articles that need to discuss the speculation and controversy.

I don't want to litigate the AfD too much here (though we can and I can move our comments to the AfD if it would be relevant), but regarding the "compilation value", my opinion remains that this story is of interest to multiple topics – republicanism in the United Kingdom, privacy and the British royal family, public image of Catherine, etc. – that, individually, do not require the full set of events to understand what part of the controversy/narrative is relevant to that particular topic, and I am not sure what seeing the full set of events will add to these readers. For example, a discussion on privacy doesn't really need to talk about the Mother's Day photograph, and a discussion on republicanism doesn't really need to talk about the Windsor Farm Shop video or William cancelling his attendance at the memorial service. In the case of the controversy you highlight, this isn't quite the case, because there aren't that many multiple topics interested in the controversy: the biographical articles, yes; China's attitudes on divorce, yes; and censorship, yes; but what else? The controversy is also fairly short to summarise, at least judging by what has been written across the three articles you've linked: it is an event, rather than a set of events in Where is Kate?'s case. IgnatiusofLondon (he/him • ☎️) 20:25, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240403202500","author":"IgnatiusofLondon","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-IgnatiusofLondon-20240403202500-Jason211pacem-20240403182100","replies":[]}}-->

Hello, IgnatiusofLondon. Thank you for your work on Capanno Garibaldi. Rusalkii, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for a through and high quality article! With maybe some slight work it looks ready for a GA nomination.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Rusalkii}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Rusalkii (talk) 21:47, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240404214700","author":"Rusalkii","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Rusalkii-20240404214700-I_have_sent_you_a_note_about_a_page_you_started","replies":[]}}-->

I'm ready. Could you create the article? I'll look for the sources. JacktheBrown (talk) 13:24, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240409132400","author":"JackkBrown","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-JackkBrown-20240409132400-\"Missing_food_and_drink\"","replies":["c-IgnatiusofLondon-20240409134300-JackkBrown-20240409132400"],"displayName":"JacktheBrown"}}-->

Sure, see Draft:U cumbitu. I've extrapolated what I could from the source I left on your talkpage yesterday. No need to go through the AfC process; we can page-move it onto mainspace once it's ready. IgnatiusofLondon (he/him • ☎️) 13:43, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240409134300","author":"IgnatiusofLondon","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-IgnatiusofLondon-20240409134300-JackkBrown-20240409132400","replies":["c-JackkBrown-20240409135200-IgnatiusofLondon-20240409134300"]}}-->

I found this source, it isn't the best but it's among the most authoritative I have found: https://digilander.libero.it/galatro.rc/tradizion2/disum_cumbitu_sangiuseppi.htm. JacktheBrown (talk) 13:52, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240409135200","author":"JackkBrown","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-JackkBrown-20240409135200-IgnatiusofLondon-20240409134300","replies":["c-IgnatiusofLondon-20240409135700-JackkBrown-20240409135200"],"displayName":"JacktheBrown"}}-->

I searched "pasta fagioli calabria san giuseppe" and am now getting some results for the spelling "u 'mmitu"? My hunch is that we need to try a few different variations! IgnatiusofLondon (he/him • ☎️) 13:57, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240409135700","author":"IgnatiusofLondon","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-IgnatiusofLondon-20240409135700-JackkBrown-20240409135200","replies":["c-JackkBrown-20240409151500-IgnatiusofLondon-20240409135700"]}}-->

Couldn't you have chosen a simpler subject? I'm joking ahahaha. JacktheBrown (talk) 15:15, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240409151500","author":"JackkBrown","type":"comment","level":5,"id":"c-JackkBrown-20240409151500-IgnatiusofLondon-20240409135700","replies":["c-IgnatiusofLondon-20240409152400-JackkBrown-20240409151500"],"displayName":"JacktheBrown"}}-->

I did say that we would have to scrape sources ;) One concern I have now is whether u cumbitu refers to a pasta and chickpea dish, as the first source suggests, or a banquet/social event, as the source you've provided suggests. IgnatiusofLondon (he/him • ☎️) 15:24, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240409152400","author":"IgnatiusofLondon","type":"comment","level":6,"id":"c-IgnatiusofLondon-20240409152400-JackkBrown-20240409151500","replies":["c-JackkBrown-20240409153900-IgnatiusofLondon-20240409152400"]}}-->

According to Italian sources, the second. JacktheBrown (talk) 15:39, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240409153900","author":"JackkBrown","type":"comment","level":7,"id":"c-JackkBrown-20240409153900-IgnatiusofLondon-20240409152400","replies":["c-IgnatiusofLondon-20240409205600-JackkBrown-20240409153900"],"displayName":"JacktheBrown"}}-->

I think I've solved the mystery: we're talking about lagane e ceci as the principal dish. I'll keep expanding Draft:U cumbitu to see if we have a viable standalone article, but a merge may otherwise be in order (probably with [Draft:U cumbitu]] as a subsection of lagane e ceci. By the way, commons:File:Lagane e ciciari ara cusentina.jpg can be added to that article's infobox. IgnatiusofLondon (he/him • ☎️) 20:56, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240409205600","author":"IgnatiusofLondon","type":"comment","level":8,"id":"c-IgnatiusofLondon-20240409205600-JackkBrown-20240409153900","replies":["c-JackkBrown-20240410172700-IgnatiusofLondon-20240409205600"]}}-->

Well done (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lagane_e_ceci&diff=prev&oldid=1218248367). JacktheBrown (talk) 17:27, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240410172700","author":"JackkBrown","type":"comment","level":9,"id":"c-JackkBrown-20240410172700-IgnatiusofLondon-20240409205600","replies":["c-IgnatiusofLondon-20240410172900-JackkBrown-20240410172700"],"displayName":"JacktheBrown"}}-->

I couldn't and wouldn't have done it without you! :)) IgnatiusofLondon (he/him • ☎️) 17:29, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240410172900","author":"IgnatiusofLondon","type":"comment","level":10,"id":"c-IgnatiusofLondon-20240410172900-JackkBrown-20240410172700","replies":["c-JackkBrown-20240410173300-IgnatiusofLondon-20240410172900"]}}-->

Thank you, but this time you did it all, I only got the source and little else. Thanks to you! JacktheBrown (talk) 17:33, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240410173300","author":"JackkBrown","type":"comment","level":11,"id":"c-JackkBrown-20240410173300-IgnatiusofLondon-20240410172900","replies":[],"displayName":"JacktheBrown"}}-->

Hi, I added a new reference (BOOK) to the Carbonara page, how do I change the page? It's no. 75. JacktheBrown (talk) 13:10, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240410131000","author":"JackkBrown","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-JackkBrown-20240410131000-Bibliography","replies":["c-IgnatiusofLondon-20240410131500-JackkBrown-20240410131000"],"displayName":"JacktheBrown"}}-->

Please check I've added it to the right book! Usually, go to the template documentation and find the name of the relevant parameter. IgnatiusofLondon (he/him • ☎️) 13:15, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240410131500","author":"IgnatiusofLondon","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-IgnatiusofLondon-20240410131500-JackkBrown-20240410131000","replies":["c-JackkBrown-20240410132100-IgnatiusofLondon-20240410131500"]}}-->

No, it doesn't work, also because I took the source from the spaghetti alla puttanesca page and there was no page number; I would also like to add this book to the pasta alla gricia page. JacktheBrown (talk) 13:21, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240410132100","author":"JackkBrown","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-JackkBrown-20240410132100-IgnatiusofLondon-20240410131500","replies":["c-IgnatiusofLondon-20240410134200-JackkBrown-20240410132100"],"displayName":"JacktheBrown"}}-->

I'm confused what you're trying to do. Is it the 2007 or the 2013 book that should have page 75? In the wikicode, the parameter that needs adding/changing is "|p=75", so simply remove "|pages=" if that parameter exists and swap it for "|p=75", or add "|p=75" if the "|pages=" parameter doesn't exist yet. IgnatiusofLondon (he/him • ☎️) 13:42, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240410134200","author":"IgnatiusofLondon","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-IgnatiusofLondon-20240410134200-JackkBrown-20240410132100","replies":["c-JackkBrown-20240410134600-IgnatiusofLondon-20240410134200"]}}-->

I simply took the source from the spaghetti alla puttanesca page; anyway, 2013. JacktheBrown (talk) 13:46, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240410134600","author":"JackkBrown","type":"comment","level":5,"id":"c-JackkBrown-20240410134600-IgnatiusofLondon-20240410134200","replies":["c-IgnatiusofLondon-20240410134800-JackkBrown-20240410134600"],"displayName":"JacktheBrown"}}-->

Why didn't this edit work then? With that edit, the citation read (emphasis mine):

Zanini De Vita, Oretta; Fant, Maureen B. (2013). Sauces & Shapes: Pasta the Italian Way. New York: W. W. Norton & Company. p. 75. ISBN 978-0-393-08243-2.

IgnatiusofLondon (he/him • ☎️) 13:48, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240410134800","author":"IgnatiusofLondon","type":"comment","level":6,"id":"c-IgnatiusofLondon-20240410134800-JackkBrown-20240410134600","replies":["c-JackkBrown-20240410135100-IgnatiusofLondon-20240410134800"]}}-->

As I told you, the page from which I took the source (spaghetti alla puttanesca) doesn't provide this parameter, so there should be another way. JacktheBrown (talk) 13:51, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240410135100","author":"JackkBrown","type":"comment","level":7,"id":"c-JackkBrown-20240410135100-IgnatiusofLondon-20240410134800","replies":["c-IgnatiusofLondon-20240410135500-JackkBrown-20240410135100"],"displayName":"JacktheBrown"}}-->

Okay, now I think I understand what you mean. You want the book (without the page number) to be in the bibliography, then you want an inline citation that links to the book and specifies the page number. Note that this will be inconsistent with what the article currently does for the 2007 book. Is that what you mean?

The inline citation you want to add is {{sfn|Zanini De Vita|Fant|2013|p=75}} in the desired place in the article body. IgnatiusofLondon (he/him • ☎️) 13:55, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240410135500","author":"IgnatiusofLondon","type":"comment","level":8,"id":"c-IgnatiusofLondon-20240410135500-JackkBrown-20240410135100","replies":[]}}-->

Soppressata and sopressa are the same food, yet we have two different pages; how do we solve this problem? https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soppressata. JacktheBrown (talk) 13:46, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240411134600","author":"JackkBrown","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-JackkBrown-20240411134600-Soppressata_and_sopressa","replies":["c-IgnatiusofLondon-20240411135000-JackkBrown-20240411134600"],"displayName":"JacktheBrown"}}-->

If you can think of any reason at all why an editor would object, WP:MERGEINIT. Otherwise, skip to WP:PROMERGE. IgnatiusofLondon (he/him • ☎️) 13:50, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240411135000","author":"IgnatiusofLondon","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-IgnatiusofLondon-20240411135000-JackkBrown-20240411134600","replies":["c-JackkBrown-20240411135900-IgnatiusofLondon-20240411135000"]}}-->

I have never proposed a merge, because I have never been in this situation; I haven't quite understood how to do it. JacktheBrown (talk) 13:59, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240411135900","author":"JackkBrown","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-JackkBrown-20240411135900-IgnatiusofLondon-20240411135000","replies":[],"displayName":"JacktheBrown"}}-->

I'm very glad that there is another person who cares enough about Italian food on en.wiki, you make me feel less alone in this (Talk:Cotechino#Merger from Cotechino Modena); thank you. JacktheBrown (talk) 14:42, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240413144200","author":"JackkBrown","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-JackkBrown-20240413144200-Thank_you","replies":["c-IgnatiusofLondon-20240413154900-JackkBrown-20240413144200"],"displayName":"JacktheBrown"}}-->

Thanks to you! One thing I find helps the loneliness is tracking my pageviews, which returns the pageviews of every page wikilinked to this page that I maintain. Here is a query for every wikilink in List of Italian foods and drinks. IgnatiusofLondon (he/him • ☎️) 15:49, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240413154900","author":"IgnatiusofLondon","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-IgnatiusofLondon-20240413154900-JackkBrown-20240413144200","replies":["c-JackkBrown-20240413185900-IgnatiusofLondon-20240413154900"]}}-->

Since you are English, could you please help me with this sentence? "Although there may be many variations of the same Italian food, and though there are certainly many variations under the umbrella of the term zuppa toscana, classic zuppa toscana's main ingredients are cannellini beans, potatoes, and kale." (zuppa toscana). I have already used "Although" (here: "although in Italy it is called "minestra di pane", meaning 'bread soup'.") and wouldn't like to repeat it; I know that in English there is also "even tought", although in writing it's not formal enough; do I use "despite"? JacktheBrown (talk) 18:59, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240413185900","author":"JackkBrown","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-JackkBrown-20240413185900-IgnatiusofLondon-20240413154900","replies":["c-IgnatiusofLondon-20240413190300-JackkBrown-20240413185900"],"displayName":"JacktheBrown"}}-->

There are quite a lot of superfluous words that don't really, in my view, add anything to that very long sentence. I also don't think a general comment about Italian food is apposite. I would simply write: "While there are many variations of zuppa toscana, its classic ingredients are cannellini beans, potatoes, and kale". IgnatiusofLondon (he/him • ☎️) 19:03, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240413190300","author":"IgnatiusofLondon","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-IgnatiusofLondon-20240413190300-JackkBrown-20240413185900","replies":["c-JackkBrown-20240413180800-IgnatiusofLondon-20240413190300"]}}-->

Thank you very much! If you want you can edit the sentence (by the way, I didn't write it, it was already there). JacktheBrown (talk) 18:08, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240413180800","author":"JackkBrown","type":"comment","level":5,"id":"c-JackkBrown-20240413180800-IgnatiusofLondon-20240413190300","replies":[],"displayName":"JacktheBrown"}}-->

If you are interested, I'm currently working on the vastedda page; I think it can be expanded. If you want to help me, we could start improving the sentences already there. JacktheBrown (talk) 19:07, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240414190700","author":"JackkBrown","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-JackkBrown-20240414190700-Thank_you","replies":[],"displayName":"JacktheBrown"}}-->

New Page Patrol | May 2024 Articles Backlog Drive
On 1 May 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each review will earn 1 point. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:14, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240417161400","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20240417161400-New_page_patrol_May_2024_Backlog_drive","replies":[]}}-->

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pope, Tennessee. Hello, I recently nominated Pope, Tennessee for deletion. I am messaging you as I thought you might be interested in the matter. GMH Melbourne (talk) 13:16, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240501131600","author":"GMH Melbourne","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-GMH_Melbourne-20240501131600-New_message_from_GMH_Melbourne","replies":[]}}-->

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2024).

Administrator changes

Nyttend

• JohnOwens
• Killiondude
• MelanieN
• Nihonjoe

Bureaucrat changes

Nihonjoe

CheckUser changes

Joe Roe

Oversight changes

GeneralNotability

Guideline and policy news

• Phase I of the 2024 requests for adminship review has concluded. Several proposals have passed outright and will proceed to implementation, including creating a discussion-only period (3b) and administrator elections (13) on a trial basis. Other successful proposals, such as creating a reminder of civility norms (2), will undergo further refinement in Phase II. Proposals passed on a trial basis will be discussed in Phase II, after their trials conclude. Further details on specific proposals can be found in the full report.

Technical news

• Partial action blocks are now in effect on the English Wikipedia. This means that administrators have the ability to restrict users from certain actions, including uploading files, moving pages and files, creating new pages, and sending thanks. T280531

Arbitration

• The arbitration case Conflict of interest management has been closed.

Miscellaneous

• This may be a good time to reach out to potential nominees to ask if they would consider an RfA.
• A New Pages Patrol backlog drive is happening in May 2024 to reduce the number of unreviewed articles in the new pages feed. Currently, there is a backlog of over 15,000 articles awaiting review. Sign up here to participate!
• Voting for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) election is open until 9 May 2024. Read the voting page on Meta-Wiki and cast your vote here!

Why have you added so many duplicate sources? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Piada_dei_morti&diff=prev&oldid=1227180014. JacktheBrown (talk) 06:23, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240604062300","author":"JackkBrown","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-JackkBrown-20240604062300-Duplicates","replies":["c-IgnatiusofLondon-20240604220100-JackkBrown-20240604062300"],"displayName":"JacktheBrown"}}-->

Hey! I think the question you're asking is: "Why do you use multiple sources to support the same statement?" Two reasons:

1. Firstly, and less commonly, sometimes, I report two separate statements in the same chunk of text that are collectively covered across two sources, and so the one chunk of text requires two citations. For example, one source might say "John the dog is green" and a second source might say "John the dog is fluffy", so the statement "John the dog is green and fluffy" will require two citations. (I provide inline citations only after punctuation marks.)
2. Secondly, and more commonly, I generally prefer to provide the two strongest citations for every claim/sentence I report in an article. This is purely editorial practice, not a matter of policy, but I do not believe any Wikipedia policy disallows this; indeed, WP:OVERKILL suggests that several citations are sometimes preferable to a single one. My rationale is that two citations mean that if one citation is challenged (for example, it becomes a dead link, or there is a dispute about its reliability), the second citation is readily available for readers and editors to consult/someone has already done the hard work of finding an alternative source, without having to add a "citation needed" template. This increases trust in Wikipedia's reliability, and comes at an acceptable cost to readability, whereas three citations would disrupt readibility much more. It also highlights claims/sentences that, being supported by only one citation, may not be widely supported/commonly discussed in sources on the topic.

I see you've reverted your edit already, for which I am grateful, as I would have asked you to consider whether removing citations was really a helpful revision to the article. In general, I think WP:OVERKILL is inapplicable unless we're talking about 3+ more citations for uncontroversial claims/sentences. While I'm not encouraging other editors to take up my editorial practices, and recognise I uphold a minority viewpoint, I think it would be a misdirection of your time to go about culling my citations; there are very important contributions to the encyclopaedia, for which you are skilled, that are more deserving of the generous time you offer to improve Wikipedia. IgnatiusofLondon (he/him • ☎️) 22:01, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240604220100","author":"IgnatiusofLondon","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-IgnatiusofLondon-20240604220100-JackkBrown-20240604062300","replies":["c-JackkBrown-20240604222300-IgnatiusofLondon-20240604220100"]}}-->

@IgnatiusofLondon: in fact, I have left it, also because it seems to me a very good thing in this case what you have done; however, for example, as regards pages with only two or three references (not created by you) that always repeat these same references every line, I have removed the multiple citations. JacktheBrown (talk) 22:23, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240604222300","author":"JackkBrown","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-JackkBrown-20240604222300-IgnatiusofLondon-20240604220100","replies":["c-IgnatiusofLondon-20240604223800-JackkBrown-20240604222300"],"displayName":"JacktheBrown"}}-->

Thanks! Yes, I tend to do that too, e.g. if a paragraph contains only the same inline citation multiple times in a paragraph, I remove them and just put one citation at the end of the paragraph. IgnatiusofLondon (he/him • ☎️) 22:38, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240604223800","author":"IgnatiusofLondon","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-IgnatiusofLondon-20240604223800-JackkBrown-20240604222300","replies":[]}}-->

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2024).

Administrator changes

Graham Beards

• Deskana
• Mets501
• Staxringold

Bureaucrat changes

• Deskana
• Warofdreams

Oversight changes

Dreamy Jazz

Guideline and policy news

• Phase II of the 2024 RfA review has commenced to improve and refine the proposals passed in Phase I.

Technical news

• The Nuke feature, which enables administrators to mass delete pages, will now correctly delete pages which were moved to another title. T43351

Arbitration

• The arbitration case Venezuelan politics has been closed.
• The Committee is seeking volunteers for various roles, including access to the conflict of interest VRT queue.

Miscellaneous

• WikiProject Reliability's unsourced statements drive is happening in June 2024 to replace {{citation needed}} tags with references! Sign up here to participate!

I wanted to take a moment to recognize and appreciate all your incredible work on Wikipedia. Your edits have improved not only English Wikipedia but also Wikipédia français and Wikipedia italiana. TheSpacebook (talk) 23:46, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240607234600","author":"TheSpacebook","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-TheSpacebook-20240607234600-Happy_One_Year_of_Editing","replies":["c-IgnatiusofLondon-20240610200500-TheSpacebook-20240607234600"]}}-->

Many thanks, @TheSpacebook, I appreciate it! I hope you are well! IgnatiusofLondon (he/him • ☎️) 20:05, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240610200500","author":"IgnatiusofLondon","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-IgnatiusofLondon-20240610200500-TheSpacebook-20240607234600","replies":[]}}-->

Hi. Do you think this sentence is good or should be improved? "is a variety of gelato, consisting of milk-based gelato with fine strands of drizzled chocolate stirred through it." JacktheBrown (talk) 14:04, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240608140400","author":"JackkBrown","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-JackkBrown-20240608140400-Stracciatella_(ice_cream)","replies":["c-IgnatiusofLondon-20240610200800-JackkBrown-20240608140400"],"displayName":"JacktheBrown"}}-->

Not an expert on the topic, as it's not my favourite flavour of gelato! It strikes me that "milk-based" may be redundant. IgnatiusofLondon (he/him • ☎️) 20:08, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240610200800","author":"IgnatiusofLondon","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-IgnatiusofLondon-20240610200800-JackkBrown-20240608140400","replies":["c-JackkBrown-20240610203900-IgnatiusofLondon-20240610200800"]}}-->

But "milk-based" is only written once. JacktheBrown (talk) 20:39, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240610203900","author":"JackkBrown","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-JackkBrown-20240610203900-IgnatiusofLondon-20240610200800","replies":["c-IgnatiusofLondon-20240610204500-JackkBrown-20240610203900"],"displayName":"JacktheBrown"}}-->

I would think "gelato" suggests milk? IgnatiusofLondon (he/him • ☎️) 20:45, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240610204500","author":"IgnatiusofLondon","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-IgnatiusofLondon-20240610204500-JackkBrown-20240610203900","replies":["c-JackkBrown-20240610210700-IgnatiusofLondon-20240610204500","c-JackkBrown-20240610210900-IgnatiusofLondon-20240610204500"]}}-->

Yes yes, you're right ("60–80% milk"). JacktheBrown (talk) 21:07, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240610210700","author":"JackkBrown","type":"comment","level":5,"id":"c-JackkBrown-20240610210700-IgnatiusofLondon-20240610204500","replies":[],"displayName":"JacktheBrown"}}-->

Is the sentence better now? JacktheBrown (talk) 21:09, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240610210900","author":"JackkBrown","type":"comment","level":5,"id":"c-JackkBrown-20240610210900-IgnatiusofLondon-20240610204500","replies":[],"displayName":"JacktheBrown"}}-->

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2024).

Administrator changes

• Elli
• HouseBlaster
• Pickersgill-Cunliffe

• Brianga
• De728631
• Georgewilliamherbert
• Hyacinth (deceased)
• ProveIt
• The Night Watch

Technical news

• Local administrators can now add new links to the bottom of the site Tools menu without using JavaScript. Documentation is available on MediaWiki. (T6086)

Miscellaneous

• The Community Wishlist is re-opening on 15 July 2024. Read more

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2024).

Administrator changes

Isabelle Belato

• Ian.thomson
• Modussiccandi

Interface administrator changes

Izno

CheckUser changes

Barkeep49

Technical news

• Global blocks may now target accounts as well as IP's. Administrators may locally unblock when appropriate.
• Users wishing to permanently leave may now request "vanishing" via Special:GlobalVanishRequest. Processed requests will result in the user being renamed, their recovery email being removed, and their account being globally locked.

Arbitration

• The Arbitration Committee appointed the following administrators to the conflict of interest volunteer response team: Bilby, Extraordinary Writ

New pages patrol | September 2024 Backlog Drive
On 1 September 2024, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each article review will earn 1 point, and each redirect review will earn 0.2 points. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:09, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240826170900","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20240826170900-New_pages_patrol_September_2024_Backlog_drive","replies":[]}}-->

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2024).

Administrator changes

Pppery

Interface administrator changes

Pppery

Oversighter changes

Wugapodes

CheckUser changes

• Courcelles
• GeneralNotability

Guideline and policy news

• Following an RfC, there is a new criterion for speedy deletion: C4, which applies to unused maintenance categories, such as empty dated maintenance categories for dates in the past.
• A request for comment is open to discuss whether Notability (species) should be adopted as a subject-specific notability guideline.

Arbitration

• Following a motion, remedies 5.1 and 5.2 of World War II and the history of Jews in Poland (the topic and interaction bans on My very best wishes, respectively) were repealed.
• Remedy 3C of the German war effort case ("Cinderella157 German history topic ban") was suspended for a period of six months.
• The arbitration case Historical Elections is currently open. Proposed decision is expected by 3 September 2024 for this case.

Miscellaneous

• Editors can now enter into good article review circles, an alternative for informal quid pro quo arrangements, to have a GAN reviewed in return for reviewing a different editor's nomination.
• A New Pages Patrol backlog drive is happening in September 2024 to reduce the number of unreviewed articles and redirects in the new pages feed. Currently, there is a backlog of over 13,900 articles and 26,200 redirects awaiting review. Sign up here to participate!

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2024).

Administrator changes

• Asilvering
• Significa liberdade

• Good Olfactory
• Hesperian
• I JethroBT
• TommyBoy
• Woody

CheckUser changes

• Barkeep49
• Izno

• Doug Weller
• Spicy

Guideline and policy news

• Administrator elections are a proposed new process for selecting administrators, offering an alternative to requests for adminship (RfA). The first trial election will take place in October 2024, with candidate sign-up from October 8 to 14, a discussion phase from October 22 to 24, and SecurePoll voting from October 25 to 31. For questions or to help out, please visit the talk page at Wikipedia talk:Administrator elections.
• Following a discussion, the speedy deletion reason "File pages without a corresponding file" has been moved from criterion G8 to F2. This does not change what can be speedily deleted.
• A request for comment is open to discuss whether there is a consensus to have an administrator recall process.

Arbitration

• The arbitration case Historical elections has been closed.
• An arbitration case regarding Backlash to diversity and inclusion has been opened.
• Editors are invited to nominate themselves to serve on the 2024 Arbitration Committee Electoral Commission until 23:59 October 8, 2024 (UTC).

Miscellaneous

• If you are interested in stopping spammers, please put MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist and MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist on your watchlist, and help out when you can.

In April you declined this page submitted by Alexreid2. He revised it with additional information in respect of academic-specific notability criteria, but in doing so appears to have deleted the advisory box. The page has not been further edited for five months, and will soon be at risk of six-month deletion. Today I have added readily available citation information from Google Scholar and Researchgate, acknowledging Wikipedia advice page on academic notability is ambiguous about whether these are to be considered definitive. I hope the page will be kept. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Justnumbersandletters (talk • contribs) 21:11, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20241009211100","author":"Justnumbersandletters","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Justnumbersandletters-20241009211100-Draft:Sebastian_Macmillan","replies":[]}}-->

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2024).

Administrator changes

• Crisco 1492

• Babajobu
• Daniel
• Elf
• Jayron32
• Thue
• Wugapodes

CheckUser changes

Maxim

Oversighter changes

Maxim

Guideline and policy news

• Following a discussion, the discussion-only period proposal that went for a trial to refine the requests for adminship (RfA) process has been discontinued.
• Following a request for comment, Administrator recall is adopted as a policy.

Technical news

• Mass deletions done with the Nuke tool now have the 'Nuke' tag. This change will make reviewing and analyzing deletions performed with the tool easier. T366068

Arbitration

• RoySmith, Barkeep49 and Cyberpower678 have been appointed to the Electoral Commission for the 2024 Arbitration Committee Elections. ThadeusOfNazereth and Dr vulpes are reserve commissioners.
• Eligible editors are invited to self-nominate from 3 November 2024 until 12 November 2024 to stand in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections.
• The Arbitration Committee is seeking volunteers for roles such as clerks, access to the COI queue, checkuser, and oversight.

Miscellaneous

• An unreferenced articles backlog drive is happening in November 2024 to reduce the backlog of articles tagged with {{Unreferenced}}. You can help reduce the backlog by adding citations to these articles. Sign up to participate!

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20241119005000","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20241119005000-ArbCom_2024_Elections_voter_message","replies":[]}}-->

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2024).

Administrator changes

• Ahecht
• DoubleGrazing
• Dr vulpes
• FOARP
• Peaceray
• Queen of Hearts
• Rsjaffe
• SD0001
• SilverLocust
• Sohom Datta
• ThadeusOfNazereth
• Voorts

• Ajpolino
• Fathoms Below
• Pppery
• Tamzin
• Worm That Turned

• Aervanath
• Christopher Sundita
• Dank
• Dennis Brown
• Dragons flight
• Fastily
• Graham87
• JaGa
• Kbh3rd
• Marine 69-71
• Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington
• Yamamoto Ichiro

Interface administrator changes

• SD0001
• Sohom Datta

Pppery

CheckUser changes

• Spicy
• TheresNoTime

Guideline and policy news

• Following an RFC, the policy on restoration of adminship has been updated. All former administrators may now only regain the tools following a request at the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard within 5 years of their most recent admin action. Previously this applied only to administrators deysopped for inactivity.
• Following a request for comment, a new speedy deletion criterion, T5, has been enacted. This applies to template subpages that are no longer used.

Technical news

• Technical volunteers can now register for the 2025 Wikimedia Hackathon, which will take place in Istanbul, Turkey. Application for travel and accommodation scholarships is open from November 12 to December 10, 2024.

Arbitration

• The arbitration case Yasuke (formerly titled Backlash to diversity and inclusion) has been closed.
• An arbitration case titled Palestine-Israel articles 5 has been opened. Evidence submissions in this case will close on 14 December.

January 2025 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol
On 1 January 2025, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin in hopes of addressing the growing backlog. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Each article review will earn 1 point, while each redirect review will earn 0.2 points. Streak awards will be given out based on consistently hitting point thresholds for each week of the drive. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:53, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20241218015300","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20241218015300-New_pages_patrol_January_2025_Backlog_drive","replies":[]}}-->

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2024).

Administrator changes

Sennecaster

• Daniel
• Hog Farm

• BozMo
• Ferret
• John M Wolfson
• MaxSem
• Panyd
• Tide rolls
• Titoxd

CheckUser changes

• Daniel
• Elli
• Liz
• ScottishFinnishRadish
• Theleekycauldron

Worm That Turned

Ferret

Oversight changes

• Daniel
• Elli
• Liz
• ScottishFinnishRadish
• Theleekycauldron

Worm That Turned

Guideline and policy news

• Following an RFC, Wikipedia:Notability (species) was adopted as a subject-specific notability guideline.
• A request for comment is open to discuss whether admins should be advised to warn users rather than issue no-warning blocks to those who have posted promotional content outside of article space.

Technical news

• The Nuke feature also now provides links to the userpage of the user whose pages were deleted, and to the pages which were not selected for deletion, after page deletions are queued. This enables easier follow-up admin-actions.

Arbitration

• Following the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections, the following editors have been elected to the Arbitration Committee: CaptainEek, Daniel, Elli, KrakatoaKatie, Liz, Primefac, ScottishFinnishRadish, Theleekycauldron, Worm That Turned.

Miscellaneous

• A New Pages Patrol backlog drive is happening in January 2025 to reduce the number of unreviewed articles and redirects in the new pages feed. Sign up here to participate!