Bumthang language

You can help expand this article with text translated from the corresponding article in Portuguese. (March 2022) Click [show] for important translation instructions. Machine translation, like DeepL or Google Translate, is a useful starting point for translations, but translators must revise errors as necessary and confirm that the translation is accurate, rather than simply copy-pasting machine-translated text into the English Wikipedia. Consider adding a topic to this template: there are already 536 articles in the main category, and specifying|topic= will aid in categorization. Do not translate text that appears unreliable or low-quality. If possible, verify the text with references provided in the foreign-language article. You must provide copyright attribution in the edit summary accompanying your translation by providing an interlanguage link to the source of your translation. A model attribution edit summary is Content in this edit is translated from the existing Portuguese Wikipedia article at [[:pt:Língua bumthang]]; see its history for attribution. You may also add the template {{Translated|pt|Língua bumthang}} to the talk page. For more guidance, see Wikipedia:Translation.

Bumthang
Native to	Bhutan
Native speakers	20,000 (2011)[1]
Language family	Sino-Tibetan Tibeto-Burman Tibeto-Kanauri (?) Bodish East Bodish Bumthang
Language codes
ISO 639-3	kjz
Glottolog	bumt1240
Linguistic map of Bhutan, showing the location where Bumthang is spoken

The Bumthang language (Dzongkha: བུམ་ཐང་ཁ་, Wylie: bum thang kha; also called Bhumtam, Bumtang(kha), Bumtanp, Bumthapkha, and Kebumtamp) is an East Bodish language spoken by about 20,000 people in Bumthang and surrounding districts of Bhutan.^[2][3] Van Driem (1993) describes Bumthang as the dominant language of central Bhutan.^[3]

Historically, Bumthang and its speakers have had close contact with speakers of the Kurtöp, Nupbi and Kheng languages, nearby East Bodish languages of central and eastern Bhutan, to the extent that they may be considered part of a wider collection of "Bumthang languages."^[4][5][6]

Bumthang language is largely lexically similar with Kheng (98%), Nyen (75%–77%), and Kurtöp (70%–73%); but less so with Dzongkha (47%–52%) and Tshangla (40%–50%, also called "Sharchop").^[2] It is either closely related to or identical with the Tawang language of the Monpa people of Tawang in India and China.^[2]

Bumthang is either written with the Tibetan or Romanized Dzongkha scripts.

There are also thirteen vowels:

There is a high register tone and a low register tone. Syllables with a high register tone are preceded by a ' mark.

Bumthang is an ergative–absolutive language. The ergative case is not used on every transitive subject, but, like in many other languages of the region shows some optionality, discussed in detail by Donohue & Donohue (2016).^[8] Using the ergative denotes a high degree of agentivity of the subject.

The plural suffix in nouns is -tshai. Adjectives follow nouns. The ergative suffix in nouns is -le, while in personal pronouns it is -i. The ergative suffix may follow the collective suffix gampo. The genitive may take on the suffix -rae (e.g. we-rae 'your own'). The telic suffix -QO, where both Q (realized as [k], [g], [ng], [t], or [d]) and O take on a different value based on the final consonant and vowel of a word, denotes the goal of a situation which the word is directed to (e.g. Thimphuk-gu 'to Thimphu', yam-do 'on the way'). Distinct from the telic, the locative suffix -na (e.g. yak-na 'in the hand').

The numeral system of Bumthang is largely base-20. The numeral thek 'one' is also used to denote 'a/an, a certain one'.

The finite verb is inflected for tense, aspect, and evidentiality. Mood is usually marked by an auxiliary. TAM categories include the present, the experienced past, the inferred past, the experienced imperfective, the periphrastic perfect, the infinitival future, the volitional future, the supine, the gerund, the adhortative, and the optative.

Present-tense (incompletive in Donohue's system) forms are formed with a suffix containing a coronal consonant followed by a. Each dialect has wildly differing, but generally phonologically conditioned systems governing exactly which consonant does the present suffix begin with.

Van Driem also notes a "hard" vs. "soft" stem among open syllables, with "hard" open syllables taking different ending allomorphs than "soft" ones.

The present form is negated by preceding the verb root with me (mi in Chunmat).

The experienced past (or personal perfective in Donohue's notation) is used to express past events that the speaker (or second-person addressee) themselves personally witnessed or experienced happening.

The experienced past is marked with either -s or no ending attached to the verb root; the distribution of the two markers varies by dialect. Root-final -k is also deleted in the experienced past in many dialects.

The experienced past in -s cannot be negated. Instead, to form a negative experienced past form with the negative prefix ma, -t is suffixed to the verb root after soft open stems. After other types of stems, no suffix is attached.

In non-'Ura dialects, the verb gai "to go" irregularly forms its experienced past with -e. On the other hand, in 'Ura, gai simply takes the regular -s.

The inferred past (impersonal perfective in Donohue's work) is used to indicate a past event that the speaker did not personally witness occurring, but can infer to have happened based on leftover evidence. In all verbs, the inferred past is formed with the suffix -na (in Chogor and Chunmat), -zumut ('Ura) or -simut (non-Chutö Tang) after the verb root. The inferred past is negated by having ma precede the affirmative form.

The contrast between experienced and inferred past forms can be exemplified as follows, with both phrases translating to "he has eaten" and featuring the verb zu "to eat":

• Chit zus, in the experienced past, implies that the speaker saw the subject eat something.
• Chit zuna, in the inferred past, implies the speaker did not see the subject eat something but can deduce that eating had occurred, e.g. due to the disappearance of food the subject had eaten.

The experienced imperfective is formed by suffixing -sa or -ba to the verb root; the former occurs after soft open-syllable verbs, and the latter elsewhere. The suffix -ba may be lenited to -wa in fast speech. The experienced imperfective cannot be negated; instead the negative experienced past form is used.

The nominalizer -i can be attached to the experienced imperfective to form what Van Driem calls the past participle. In negative phrases, -i becomes -i-gi after soft open-stem verbs and -gi elsewhere.

The past participle has two functions:

• To create verbal modifiers for nouns;
• To create periphrastic constructions with the copulas wen (in the affirmative) and min (in the negative). They denote perfect aspect, and are also used in phrases declaring the identity of the perpetrator of a past event.

The nominalizer -i can also be suffixed to the infinitival future to allow the infinitival future to modify a noun.

The infinitival future (or personal irrealis in Donohue's work) is formed with the suffix -mala (in Chogor and Chunmat) or -sang (in 'Ura and some of Tang). It is used to denote events that may happen in the future.

The infinitival future can be followed by the copula wen to indicate a planned event.

The volitional future, in contrast to the infinitival future, indicates an action that the subject either intends to do or is confident will happen in the future. It is formed with the suffix -ge. Van Driem exemplifies the contrast between the two futures with the following pair:

The negative volitional future is formed with the negative prefix me (or mi in Chunmat). The suffix -ge is omitted in the negative unless the evidential marker -na is present.

The supine (or infinitive in Donohue's work) is formed with a suffix in the shape -CV (a consonant followed by a vowel) whose form varies depending on the phonetics of the verb root.

• The vowel of the suffix is o everywhere except after a high vowel /i/ or /u/; in that case the suffix vowel becomes u.
• The consonant of the suffix is:
  • -g- after -k, e.g. pok-go "to beat (someone) up".
  • -ng- after -ng, e.g. thong-ngo "to drink" and yung-ngu "to fetch".
  • -t- after -p, e.g. thap-to "to argue" and tup-tu "to cut".
  • -r- after soft open-syllable roots, like in zu-ru "to eat" and se-ro "to die".
  • -d- elsewhere.

The supine is used to form verbal complements to verbs like gai "to go", tshuk "can, to be able", and 'nyam "to feel like (doing)". Examples from Van Driem include:

The imperative mood, used to express commands, is indicated via a suffix that is underlyingly -lae (which may be contracted to -lä in rapid speech). This suffix has many allomorphs:

• Root-final -t is deleted in the imperative, so dot "to sleep" and sut "to kill" form do-lae "sleep!" and su-lae "kill!".
• -lae becomes -mae after -m, e.g. in num "to sniff, smell" with imperative num-mae "sniff!".
• The -l- in the imperative suffix is lost after -ng, -k, and -p. -k and -p, in turn, become voiced to -g- and -b-. For instance:
  • yang "to stand" forms the imperative yang-ae "stand up!"
  • pok "to beat" forms the imperative pog-ae "beat!"
  • tup "to cut" forms the imperative tub-ae "cut!"
• Soft open-syllable verbs have particularly volatile imperative formation. Donohue posits an underlying -e suffix.
  • This suffix may be lost if the root vowel is already e, or coalesce into a diphthong ye like in se "to die", where Donohue reports imperatives sye and se.
  • If the soft-stem verb ends in a i or u, Donohue and Van Driem do not agree on the result. Van Driem observes that the verb root vowel is changed to e or ö, respectively. On the other hand, Donohue says that i soft-stem verbs are suffixed with -ye, while u/o soft-stem verbs have the u or o of the root coalesce with the -e suffix to form -we.
  • -e fuses with -a to form -ai. Thus, tsha "to see" forms the imperative tshai "see!".
• Irregular imperatives include wai (for o "to bring"), hrai (for ra "to come"), and ga-lae (for gai "to go").

The gerund (or sequential in Donohue's work) is used to mark events that occurred at the same time as, or just immediately before, the action of the main verb. It is also used to form the verbal complement of zat "to finish". It is marked with the suffix -se (or in Chunmat, -si or -zi) after the verb root.

Examples of the gerund include:

The ending -kya is suffixed to verb roots to form adhortative phrases that encourage others to do something. For example, gai "to go" forms the adhortative gai-kya "let's go".

The optative mood is indicated with an ending -ga in most dialects. Some dialects instead have the optative ending -(n)ja, which manifests as -nja after open syllables (both hard and soft) and -ja after other syllables.

Bumthang has two particles that mark hearsay that follow the verb; they are shu for interrogative phrases and re for non-interrogative phrases.

• Languages of Bhutan
• Bumthang District
• Bumthang Province
• Kingdom of Bumthang

• van Driem, George (1995). Grammar of Bumthang - A Language of Central Bhutan. Dzongkha Development Commission.
• van Driem, George. 2015. Synoptic grammar of the Bumthang language. Himalayan Linguistics. Open access

Wikivoyage has a phrasebook for Bumthangkha.

• Bumthang language project
• Himalayan Languages Project^[usurped]