1998 Minnesota gubernatorial election
1998 Minnesota gubernatorial election
County results Precinct results Ventura: 30–40% 40–50% 50–60% 60–70% 70–80% 80–90% >90%Coleman: 30–40% 40–50% 50–60% 60–70% 70–80% 80–90% >90%Humphrey: 30–40% 40–50% 50–60% 60–70% 70–80% 80–90% >90%Other: 40–50% 60–70%Tie: 30–40% 40–50% 50% No votes
The 1998 Minnesota gubernatorial election took place on November 3, 1998. Reform Party candidate Jesse Ventura , the former mayor of Brooklyn Park and a former professional wrestler , won office, defeating Republican St. Paul mayor Norm Coleman and DFL state attorney general Skip Humphrey . He succeeded Republican incumbent Arne Carlson , who was term limited. Ventura's victory as a third-party candidate was considered a historic major upset.[ 1]
To date, the election marks the only time a Reform Party candidate won a major government office. It also remains the last time a third-party candidate won any statewide election in Minnesota.
DFL primary
Candidates
Skip Humphrey , Attorney General of Minnesota and son of former Vice President of the United States Hubert Humphrey and former U.S. Senator Muriel Humphrey
Running mate: Roger Moe , Minnesota Senate Majority Leader (SD2)
Ted Mondale , former State Senator (SD44) and son of former Vice President Walter Mondale
Running mate: Deanna Winter, political reporter
Mike Freeman , Hennepin County Attorney and son of former Governor Orville Freeman
Doug Johnson , State Senator (SD6) from the Iron Range and Chair of the Senate Committee on Taxation
Running mate: Tom Foley, former Ramsey County Attorney and Washington County Attorney.
Mark Dayton , Minnesota Auditor and heir to the Dayton's fortune[ 2]
Running mate: Julie Jansen, Olivia day care provider and environmental activist
Ole Savior, perennial candidate
Results
Republican primary
Candidates
Norm Coleman was elected mayor of St. Paul in 1993 as a Democrat with almost 55% of the vote. In 1996, he switched parties to become a Republican after years of heat from his party.[ 4] He won re-election as mayor in the heavily Democratic city with almost 59% of the vote in 1997.
Results
Coleman won the Republican nomination by winning the primary with token opposition.[ 5]
General election
Candidates
Ventura ran unopposed in his party's primary.[ 6]
Campaign
Humphrey was seen as the initial favorite, having scored a $6 billion settlement with the tobacco industry in May of that year.[ 7] The DFL primary saw candidates mostly focusing on issues, rather than attacking Humphrey. Humphrey had lost the party's endorsement to Mike Freeman. The primary was nicknamed the "My Three Sons" campaign, owing to the political pedigree of three of the candidates, and Mark Dayton, heir to the Dayton fortune.[ 8] Humphrey was endorsed by the Star Tribune in the run up to November.
Coleman started as a strong challenger to Humphrey. Coleman received the Republican endorsement over more conservative candidates Allen Quist and Joanne Benson . Coleman ran as a social conservative, opposing abortion and gay marriage. He also campaigned on using the state's budget surplus to cut taxes, as well as expanding the state's school choice program to include school vouchers .[ 9]
Ventura spent around $300,000 and combined it with an aggressive grassroots campaign that featured a statewide bus tour, pioneered use of the Internet for political purposes, and aired quirky TV ads designed by Bill Hillsman , who forged the phrase "Don't vote for politics as usual."[ 10] Unable to afford many television ads, Ventura mainly focused on televised debates and public appearances, preaching his brand of libertarian politics. His speech at a parade in rural Minnesota during the summer attracted what organizers of the annual event described as one of its largest audiences. He ran on cutting taxes, reducing state government, and reducing public school classroom sizes to a 17 to 1 ratio. He also supported a public debate on the viability of legalized prostitution.[ 11]
Polling
A poll taken in June showed that Coleman would defeat any other Democratic candidate than Humphrey; Humphrey would defeat Coleman 44% to 34%. However, Ventura polled in the double digits. No other candidate in the Reform Party's brief history in Minnesota has received more than 5 percent of the votes in a statewide election.[ 12] Following the primary election in September, a poll on October 20 showed Humphrey leading 35% to Coleman (34%) and Ventura (21%). But the Star Tribune poll suggested that Ventura's surge with the voters had come mostly at Humphrey's expense. Since the primary, Humphrey's support among likely voters had dropped by 14 percentage points, while Coleman's had increased by 5 percentage points.[ 13]
Debate
Results
Swing by county
Democratic — +>30%
Democratic — +25-30%
Democratic — +20-25%
Democratic — +15-20%
Democratic — +10-15%
Democratic — +5-10%
Democratic — +0-5%
Republican — +0-5%
Republican — +5-10%
Republican — +10-15%
Republican — +15-20%
Republican — +20-25%
Republican — +25-30%
Republican — +>30%
Trend by county
Democratic — +>30%
Democratic — +25-30%
Democratic — +20-25%
Democratic — +15-20%
Democratic — +10-15%
Democratic — +5-10%
Democratic — +0-5%
Republican — +0-5%
Republican — +5-10%
Republican — +10-15%
Republican — +15-20%
Republican — +20-25%
Republican — +25-30%
Republican — +>30%
Results breakdown
By county:[ 14] [ 15]
County
Coleman
Votes
Humphrey
Votes
Ventura
Votes
Others
Votes
Aitkin
31.6%
2,447
30.3%
2,347
37.4%
2,897
0.6%
47
Anoka
29.3%
37,111
19.7%
24,975
50.7%
64,100
0.3%
363
Becker
41.4%
5,030
35.7%
4,349
22.4%
2,721
0.5%
62
Beltrami
39.8%
5,872
35.9%
5,289
23.0%
3,387
1.3%
195
Benton
33.2%
4,388
20.8%
2,750
45.6%
6,027
0.4%
47
Big Stone
31.9%
912
40.0%
1,144
27.5%
786
0.5%
15
Blue Earth
30.9%
7,031
24.9%
5,666
43.8%
9,973
0.6%
111
Brown
45.2%
5,150
21.2%
2,417
33.3%
3,794
0.4%
44
Carlton
31.0%
3,929
42.9%
5,439
25.5%
3,226
0.6%
70
Carver
39.9%
11,479
16.1%
4,621
43.8%
12,606
0.3%
88
Cass
42.0%
4,781
28.9%
3,288
28.7%
3,268
0.5%
55
Chippewa
28.3%
1,721
34.0%
2,064
37.4%
2,271
0.3%
19
Chisago
28.0%
5,376
18.9%
3,621
52.8%
10,138
0.4%
71
Clay
34.7%
6,200
43.5%
7,766
21.8%
3,797
0.5%
91
Clearwater
44.8%
1,439
35.0%
1,124
19.5%
625
0.7%
24
Cook
38.6%
1,010
39.6%
1,046
18.0%
474
3.8%
100
Cottonwood
39.6%
2,420
30.8%
1,884
29.2%
1,788
0.5%
29
Crow Wing
39.7%
9,559
26.0%
6,257
33.9%
8,162
0.4%
104
Dakota
37.3%
56,242
22.0%
33,253
40.4%
60,909
0.3%
484
Dodge
37.4%
2,619
21.2%
1,484
41.0%
2,867
0.4%
27
Douglas
42.1%
6,323
23.3%
3,503
34.3%
5,162
0.3%
41
Faribault
34.2%
2,778
29.3%
2,382
36.0%
2,923
0.4%
34
Fillmore
39.7%
3,359
33.4%
2,823
26.2%
2,219
0.7%
56
Freeborn
39.5%
5,463
33.3%
4,605
26.9%
3,706
0.5%
65
Goodhue
33.9%
6,786
22.7%
4,547
43.0%
8,610
0.5%
92
Grant
30.6%
1,055
31.6%
1,089
37.5%
1,294
0.3%
10
Hennepin
31.9%
155,311
30.2%
147,059
36.9%
179,954
1.0%
4,778
Houston
48.8%
3,616
37.7%
2,797
12.0%
891
1.5%
111
Hubbard
42.6%
3,697
30.1%
2,609
26.7%
2,317
0.7%
57
Isanti
27.3%
3,719
19.6%
2,665
52.9%
7,209
0.3%
36
Itasca
37.8%
7,181
41.6%
7,911
19.8%
3,768
0.8%
143
Jackson
34.9%
1,796
33.5%
1,728
31.1%
1,605
0.5%
24
Kanabec
29.0%
1,895
21.1%
1,374
49.6%
3,238
0.3%
17
Kandiyohi
34.5%
6,287
29.3%
5,337
35.9%
6,530
0.2%
45
Kittson
32.2%
757
50.3%
1,185
16.5%
389
1.0%
23
Koochiching
46.4%
2,721
34.9%
2,347
18.1%
1,064
0.56%
31
Lac Qui
27.6%
1,133
39.5%
1,621
32.4%
1,330
0.4%
16
Lake
30.1%
1,766
42.2%
2,472
26.4%
1,545
1.3%
75
LOTW
41.5%
837
42.2%
852
14.3%
288
2.1%
41
Le Sueur
30.4%
3,582
22.2%
2,614
47.1%
5,551
0.3%
35
Lincoln
36.4%
1,129
36.7%
1,136
26.3%
815
0.6%
18
Lyon
39.1%
4,043
28.7%
2,966
31.7%
3,277
0.6%
66
McLeod
30.9%
4,754
15.9%
2,449
52.8%
8,126
0.3%
50
Mahnomen
41.8%
821
36.5%
716
20.7%
406
1.1%
21
Marshall
40.5%
1,959
41.5%
2,008
17.2%
834
0.8%
38
Martin
38.8%
3,676
26.7%
2,534
34.2%
3,243
0.2%
23
Meeker
31.3%
3,320
19.7%
2,083
48.6%
5,153
0.4%
39
Mille Lacs
31.0%
2,898
21.4%
1,998
47.2%
4,404
0.4%
39
Morrison
40.6%
5,377
21.9%
2,899
37.0%
4,905
0.6%
78
Mower
34.9%
5,529
39.3%
6,234
25.2%
3,990
0.7%
111
Murray
38.7%
1,819
34.5%
1,620
26.2%
1,233
0.6%
30
Nicollet
33.2%
4,345
25.9%
3,384
40.3%
5,272
0.6%
78
Nobles
39.0%
3,265
31.8%
2,664
28.7%
2,404
0.4%
34
Norman
31.4%
1,024
49.7%
1,621
18.3%
596
0.6%
19
Olmsted
42.7%
19,480
26.8%
12,205
30.1%
13,710
0.4%
199
Otter Tail
45.0%
10,785
29.1%
6,982
25.3%
6,069
0.5%
116
Pennington
38.8%
2,226
39.3%
2,253
21.4%
1,226
0.6%
35
Pine
26.9%
2,869
25.6%
2,730
47.1%
5,027
0.4%
48
Pipestone
46.8%
2,127
35.7%
1,621
16.6%
752
0.9%
43
Polk
40.7%
2,347
43.5%
4,462
15.5%
1,699
0.4%
44
Pope
33.6%
1,954
32.9%
1,738
36.1%
2,099
0.3%
17
Ramsey
32.4%
69,240
32.1%
68,619
34.6%
73,993
0.8%
1,714
Red Lake
39.6%
842
43.3%
920
16.0%
339
1.1%
24
Redwood
42.8%
3,140
22.5%
1,654
34.5%
2,533
0.2%
17
Renville
30.7%
2,514
25.4%
2,079
43.7%
3,583
0.3%
24
Rice
29.7%
6,732
28.5%
6,518
41.3%
9,444
0.7%
170
Rock
47.7%
1,832
36.1%
1,384
15.5%
596
0.7%
25
Roseau
49.8%
2,975
31.2%
1,863
18.1%
1,081
1.0%
57
St. Louis
28.1%
24,439
47.3%
41,208
23.8%
20,682
0.8%
17
Scott
34.9%
12,075
16.7%
5,787
48.1%
16,612
0.3%
97
Sherburne
32.1%
8,139
16.4%
4,163
51.2%
13,004
0.3%
73
Sibley
32.1%
2,261
17.9%
1,262
49.7%
3,497
0.3%
24
Stearns
38.5%
20,731
21.7%
11,696
39.2%
21,116
0.6%
320
Steele
38.5%
5,399
21.6%
3,022
39.7%
5,559
0.3%
37
Stevens
40.7%
2,052
29.9%
1,507
28.9%
1,455
0.5%
25
Swift
26.7%
1,410
35.1%
1,852
38.0%
2,006
0.2%
11
Todd
39.3%
4,293
22.4%
2,426
37.9%
4,146
0.5%
60
Traverse
34.2%
733
33.7%
721
31.5%
674
0.7%
14
Wabasha
35.8%
3,363
23.6%
2,221
40.2%
3,776
0.4%
41
Wadena
43.1%
2,563
25.9%
1,537
30.3%
1,782
1.1%
63
Waseca
35.8%
3,064
22.3%
1,904
41.4%
3,543
0.5%
42
Washington
35.8%
32,565
22.2%
20,205
41.7%
37,910
0.3%
300
Watonwan
33.4%
1,711
27.9%
1,429
38.3%
1,965
0.4%
19
Wilkin
43.2%
1,181
32.6%
892
23.4%
639
0.8%
22
Winona
42.9%
7,856
33.7%
6,176
22.1%
4,039
1.3%
235
Wright
32.1%
11,957
16.2%
6,027
51.4%
19,124
0.3%
106
Yellow Medicine
29.8%
1,628
33.7%
1,838
36.0%
1,966
0.5%
25
Totals
34.29%
717,350
28.09%
587,528
36.99%
773,713
0.63%
13,175
Notes
Partisan clients
References
^ Belluck, Pam (November 5, 1998). "A 'Bad Boy' Wrestler's Unscripted Upset" . The New York Times . Archived from the original on January 3, 2024. Retrieved October 7, 2024 .
^ "Three famous sons and heir to a fortune battle in governor's race" . Minnesota Daily . Associated Press. March 9, 1998. Retrieved August 27, 2022 .
^ "The Minnesota Legislative Manual 1999-2000" (PDF) . Minnesota Legislative Reference Library . Secretary of State Saint Paul. Retrieved October 7, 2024 .
^ Johnson, Dirk (December 20, 1996). "Speculation Follows St. Paul Mayor's Switch to Republicans" . The New York Times . Archived from the original on September 12, 2012. Retrieved October 7, 2024 .
^ "COLEMAN: AFTER AN EASY PRIMARY SEASON, GOP NOMINEE HAS TO GET DOWN TO BUSINESS" . St. Paul Pioneer Press . September 16, 1998. p. 8A. Archived from the original on October 20, 2012.
^ The Minnesota Legislative Manual 1999-2000 (PDF) . Saint Paul, Minnesota: Minnesota Secretary of State. June 1999. pp. 342–343.
^ Fisher, Marc (November 4, 1998). "Jesse 'The Body' Wins Minn. Gubernatorial Race" . Washington Post . Retrieved October 7, 2024 .
^ Jeter, Jon (September 17, 1998). "In Polite Race, Humphrey Kept Advantage" . Washington Post . Retrieved October 7, 2024 .
^ Belluck, Pam (October 31, 1998). "THE 1998 CAMPAIGN: MINNESOTA; Candidates Are Neck, Neck and Neck in Governor's Race" . The New York Times . Retrieved October 7, 2024 .
^ Howey, Brian A. "Brian Howey: Time to Take Over the Indiana Libertarian Party" . Howey Politics Indiana . Archived from the original on August 18, 2009.
^ Jeter, Jon (October 22, 1998). " 'The Body' Slams Into Politics" . The Washington Post . Retrieved October 7, 2024 .
^ Whereatt, Robert (June 3, 1998). "Minnesota Poll: Humphrey holds lead in primary and general election races" . Star Tribune . Archived from the original on June 7, 2011.
^ "NEW POLL: HUMPHREY, COLEMAN IN DEAD HEAT" . St. Paul Pioneer Press . October 12, 1998. p. 3B. Archived from the original on October 20, 2012.
^ Leip, David. "Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections" .
^ "Official General Election Vote Totals by County for the Office of Governor" (PDF) . Office of the Minnesota Secretary of State . Archived from the original (PDF) on November 27, 2008.
Further reading