Hello, Yemsquare, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Yemsquare, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

• Article development
• Standard layout
• Lead section
• The perfect article
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! GPL93 (talk) 15:03, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221014150300","author":"GPL93","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-GPL93-20221014150300-Welcome!","replies":[]}}-->

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Yemsquare requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GPL93 (talk) 15:03, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221014150300","author":"GPL93","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-GPL93-20221014150300-Speedy_deletion_nomination_of_User:Yemsquare","replies":["c-Yemsquare-20221014223000-GPL93-20221014150300"]}}-->

Hi, I'm Yemsquare, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under GLP93. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Yemsquare (talk) 22:30, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221014223000","author":"Yemsquare","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Yemsquare-20221014223000-GPL93-20221014150300","replies":[]}}-->

An article you recently created, Mike Afolarin, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Reading Beans (talk) 20:31, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221018203100","author":"Reading Beans","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Reading_Beans-20221018203100-Mike_Afolarin_moved_to_draftspace","replies":[]}}-->

Hello Yemsquare. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Mike Afolarin, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Yemsquare. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Yemsquare|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Reading Beans (talk) 20:34, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221018203400","author":"Reading Beans","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Reading_Beans-20221018203400-October_2022","replies":["c-Yemsquare-20221020151200-Reading_Beans-20221018203400"]}}-->

Hello, I'm not directly or indirectly compensated for this edits. Yemsquare (talk) 15:12, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221020151200","author":"Yemsquare","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Yemsquare-20221020151200-Reading_Beans-20221018203400","replies":[]}}-->

Hello Yemsquare. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Yemsquare. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Yemsquare|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 331dot (talk) 12:50, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221027125000","author":"331dot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-331dot-20221027125000-October_2022","replies":[]}}-->

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Yemsquare, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Yemsquare|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. 331dot (talk) 13:00, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221027130000","author":"331dot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-331dot-20221027130000-October_2022","replies":[]}}-->

You still have not adequately responded or taken action to the inquiry regarding your appearance as an undisclosed paid editor. If you make any additional edits without complying, you may be blocked from editing. 331dot (talk) 16:22, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221027162200","author":"331dot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-331dot-20221027162200-October_2022","replies":["c-331dot-20221027162300-331dot-20221027162200"]}}-->

I see your statement above, but you said you "need" to edit the draft. No one "needs" to edit anything here, so what is the source of your need? 331dot (talk) 16:23, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221027162300","author":"331dot","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-331dot-20221027162300-331dot-20221027162200","replies":[]}}-->

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as you did at Draft:MIke Afolarin, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard.

Creating another copy of the same draft that was rejected the other day is really not appropriate. bonadea contributions talk 13:51, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221031135100","author":"Bonadea","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Bonadea-20221031135100-October_2022","replies":[]}}-->

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

See WP:COI. User has stated that they are "not directly or indirectly compensated for this edits" but this doesn't fully address all forms of COI. See also WP:CIRCULAR.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mike Afolarin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 11:27, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221021112700","author":"Greenman","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Greenman-20221021112700-Your_submission_at_Articles_for_creation:_Mike_Afolarin_(October_21)","replies":[]}}-->

Hello, Yemsquare! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Greenman (talk) 11:27, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221021112700","author":"Greenman","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Greenman-20221021112700-Your_submission_at_Articles_for_creation:_Mike_Afolarin_(October_21)-1","replies":[]}}-->

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Wikipedia cannot be used as a reference.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mike Afolarin new and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 11:06, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221027110600","author":"Theroadislong","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Theroadislong-20221027110600-Your_submission_at_Articles_for_creation:_Mike_Afolarin_new_(October_27)","replies":[]}}-->

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Curbon7 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Curbon7 (talk) 11:42, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221027114200","author":"Curbon7","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Curbon7-20221027114200-Your_submission_at_Articles_for_creation:_Mike_Afolarin_(October_27)","replies":[]}}-->

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mike Afolarin. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 13:30, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221031133000","author":"Theroadislong","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Theroadislong-20221031133000-AfC_notification:_Draft:Mike_Afolarin_has_a_new_comment","replies":["c-Yemsquare-20221031171200-Theroadislong-20221031133000","c-Theroadislong-20221031172300-Theroadislong-20221031133000"]}}-->

Hello, I have seen the comment, what is the next thing to do. Yemsquare (talk) 17:12, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221031171200","author":"Yemsquare","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Yemsquare-20221031171200-Theroadislong-20221031133000","replies":[]}}-->

Errr, there are millions of articles that need improving, you could start contributing to building an encyclopaedia. Your draft will not be considered further. Theroadislong (talk) 17:23, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221031172300","author":"Theroadislong","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Theroadislong-20221031172300-Theroadislong-20221031133000","replies":["c-331dot-20221031173800-Theroadislong-20221031172300"]}}-->

Since you have disclosed your paid editing, if Mr. Afolarin has paid you, I would suggest that you return his money and tell him he does not meet the criteria for a Wikipedia article. Feel free to show him this page. 331dot (talk) 17:38, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221031173800","author":"331dot","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-331dot-20221031173800-Theroadislong-20221031172300","replies":[]}}-->

A tag has been placed on Draft:Mike Afolarin, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. GPL93 (talk) 21:45, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221107214500","author":"GPL93","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-GPL93-20221107214500-Speedy_deletion_nomination_of_Draft:Mike_Afolarin","replies":[]}}-->

Hello! Yemsquare, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz Read! Talk! 08:11, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221108081100","author":"Liz","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Liz-20221108081100-Welcome_to_Wikipedia:_check_out_the_Teahouse!","replies":[]}}-->

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mike Afolarin. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 14:42, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221122144200","author":"Theroadislong","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Theroadislong-20221122144200-AfC_notification:_Draft:Mike_Afolarin_has_a_new_comment_2","replies":[]}}-->

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

thefamousnaija is a content scraper, not a reliable source. Afolarin is not mentioned in the Cable article, nor in the Premium Times article. A brief mention about an upcoming role in the Nigerian Tribune article is not significant coverage.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mike Afolarin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 15:04, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221122150400","author":"Bonadea","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Bonadea-20221122150400-Your_submission_at_Articles_for_creation:_Mike_Afolarin_(November_22)","replies":[]}}-->

A tag has been placed on Draft:Mike Afolarin, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. GPL93 (talk) 15:19, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221229151900","author":"GPL93","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-GPL93-20221229151900-Speedy_deletion_nomination_of_Draft:Mike_Afolarin_2","replies":[]}}-->

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Deb (talk) 16:15, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20221229161500","author":"Deb","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Deb-20221229161500-Speedy_deletion_nomination_of_Draft:Mike_Afolarin_2","replies":["c-Yemsquare-20230105154500-Deb-20221229161500"]}}-->

Hello Deb, this deleted page is an Actor in NIgeria which recently release a series movie produced by Netflix titled FAR FROM HOME, so what can i do to publish is article on wki and also an editor publish this same article on wikitia Yemsquare (talk) 15:45, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20230105154500","author":"Yemsquare","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Yemsquare-20230105154500-Deb-20221229161500","replies":[]}}-->

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Draft: Mike Afolarin. Thank you.User:Shirt58 (talk) 🦘 09:40, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20230202094000","author":"Shirt58","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Shirt58-20230202094000-There_is_currently_a_discussion_at_Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard\/Inciden","replies":[],"displayName":"User:Shirt58"}}-->

Hello Yemsquare. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Mystro Sugar, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Yemsquare. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Yemsquare|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Reading Beans (talk) 12:02, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20231108120200","author":"Reading Beans","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Reading_Beans-20231108120200-November_2023","replies":[]}}-->

Hello, Yemsquare. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mystro".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 00:39, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20231214003900","author":"Explicit","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Explicit-20231214003900-Your_draft_article,_Draft:Mystro","replies":[],"displayName":"\u2717"}}-->

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mystro Sugar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mystro Sugar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

TLA (talk) 00:16, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240115001600","author":"I'm tla","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-I'm_tla-20240115001600-Nomination_of_Mystro_Sugar_for_deletion","replies":[],"displayName":"TLA"}}-->

A tag has been placed on Draft:Oluwaseye Zaccheus Omole, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Wikishovel (talk) 09:50, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240509095000","author":"Wikishovel","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Wikishovel-20240509095000-Speedy_deletion_nomination_of_Draft:Oluwaseye_Zaccheus_Omole","replies":["c-Yemsquare-20240519214600-Wikishovel-20240509095000"]}}-->

Thank you for your notification regarding the tag placed on Draft:Oluwaseye Zaccheus Omole under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

I understand the concern that the page appears to be unambiguous advertising. I would like to contest this speedy deletion. The intention behind creating the page was to provide encyclopedic information about Oluwaseye Zaccheus Omole, who has made notable contributions in his field.

I will review and rewrite the content to ensure it aligns with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, focusing on neutrality and verifiability. I aim to improve the article by providing reliable sources and removing any promotional language.

Please advise on specific areas that require attention or any additional steps I should take to avoid deletion. Your guidance is appreciated. Yemsquare (talk) 21:46, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240519214600","author":"Yemsquare","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Yemsquare-20240519214600-Wikishovel-20240509095000","replies":[]}}-->

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

See WP:COI. See also WP:BLP. Statements, starting with the date of birth, need to be sourced or removed. External links should also be removed or converted to inline citations where appropriate.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Damilola Onafuwa and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 12:05, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240717120500","author":"Greenman","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Greenman-20240717120500-Your_submission_at_Articles_for_creation:_Damilola_Onafuwa_(July_17)","replies":[]}}-->

Hello Yemsquare. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Damilola Onafuwa, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Yemsquare. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Yemsquare|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Reading Beans 11:18, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240807111800","author":"Reading Beans","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Reading_Beans-20240807111800-August_2024","replies":["c-Yemsquare-20240807155500-Reading_Beans-20240807111800"]}}-->

Hello Beans,

Thank you for bringing it to my attention regarding the way I wrote the article on Wikipedia. I want to clarify that I do not have any conflict of interest with Damilola Onafuwa, nor have I been directly or indirectly compensated for the edit. I came across his story and felt inspired to write an article about him to encourage young people to learn from his experiences.

Thank you. Yemsquare (talk) 15:55, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240807155500","author":"Yemsquare","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Yemsquare-20240807155500-Reading_Beans-20240807111800","replies":["c-Reading_Beans-20240807162600-Yemsquare-20240807155500"]}}-->

How did you get this File:Onafuwa (1).jpg? Best, Reading Beans 16:26, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240807162600","author":"Reading Beans","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Reading_Beans-20240807162600-Yemsquare-20240807155500","replies":["c-Yemsquare-20240808115900-Reading_Beans-20240807162600"]}}-->

This image was obtained from an online source with full approval from the author for its use, along with the necessary copyright permissions.

Thanks Yemsquare (talk) 11:59, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240808115900","author":"Yemsquare","type":"comment","level":4,"id":"c-Yemsquare-20240808115900-Reading_Beans-20240807162600","replies":["c-Reading_Beans-20240808132300-Yemsquare-20240808115900"]}}-->

What is the online source and is there any evidence of this supposed approval? Best, Reading Beans 13:23, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240808132300","author":"Reading Beans","type":"comment","level":5,"id":"c-Reading_Beans-20240808132300-Yemsquare-20240808115900","replies":["c-Yemsquare-20240812163400-Reading_Beans-20240808132300"]}}-->

Hello Beans,

Please find the link to the source below, along with the email confirming the approval for using the image:

https://storymaxima.com/about/

Thank you!

Yemsquare (talk) 16:34, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240812163400","author":"Yemsquare","type":"comment","level":6,"id":"c-Yemsquare-20240812163400-Reading_Beans-20240808132300","replies":[]}}-->

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Greenman were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

See WP:COI. Sourcing needs to actually verify statements, for example in the early life section, the points about his teenage years and siblings are not mentioned in the source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Damilola Onafuwa and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 09:47, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240917094700","author":"Greenman","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Greenman-20240917094700-Your_submission_at_Articles_for_creation:_Damilola_Onafuwa_(September_17)","replies":[]}}-->

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Damilola Onafuwa and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 13:54, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20240920135400","author":"Bonadea","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Bonadea-20240920135400-Your_submission_at_Articles_for_creation:_Damilola_Onafuwa_(September_20)","replies":[]}}-->

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sir MemeGod was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

As stated by Greenman, appears to be WP:COI, and is overall written in an informal tone, with words such as "captivating visual storytelling" and "provide new perspectives" being present.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Damilola Onafuwa and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SirMemeGod  01:04, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20241007010400","author":"Sir MemeGod","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Sir_MemeGod-20241007010400-Your_submission_at_Articles_for_creation:_Damilola_Onafuwa_(October_7)","replies":[],"displayName":"Sir"}}-->

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Doesn't meet WP:NFILMMAKER.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Damilola Onafuwa and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 09:43, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20241115094300","author":"SafariScribe","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-SafariScribe-20241115094300-Your_submission_at_Articles_for_creation:_Damilola_Onafuwa_(November_15)","replies":[],"displayName":"Safari Scribe"}}-->

You're invited to join the African Legislators in Red from 9 December 2024 to 9 January 2024.

Join African Legislators in Red, an initiative dedicated to creating and editing Wikipedia articles on African legislators to ensure their legacies are preserved and celebrated.

Sign up for this contest by listing your username under the participants section.

The following prizes will be awarded at the end of the contest.

• Overall winner - ₦100,000
• Runner-up - ₦70,000
• Second runner-up - ₦50,000

For more information concerning the contest and how to fully participate, visit the contest page by clicking here.

Together, let’s amplify the voices of African legislators on the global stage!

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:11, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"20241202111100","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-20241202111100-African_Legislators_in_Red_Contest_2024","replies":[]}}-->