SCN5A is a highly conserved gene[5] located on human chromosome 3, where it spans more than 100 kb. The gene consists of 28 exons, of which exon 1 and in part exon 2 form the 5' untranslated region (5’UTR) and exon 28 the 3' untranslated region (3’UTR) of the RNA. SCN5A is part of a family of 10 genes that encode different types of sodium channels, i.e. brain-type (NaV1.1, NaV1.2, NaV1.3, NaV1.6), neuronal channels (NaV1.7, NaV1.8 and NaV1.9), skeletal muscle channels (NaV1.4) and the cardiac sodium channel NaV1.5.
Expression pattern
SCN5A is mainly expressed in the heart, where expression is abundant in working myocardium and conduction tissue. In contrast, expression is low in the sinoatrial node and atrioventricular node.[6] Within the heart, a transmural expression gradient from subendocardium to subsepicardium is present, with higher expression of SCN5A in the endocardium as compared to the epicardium.[6] SCN5A is also expressed in the gastrointestinal tract.[7]
Splice variants
More than 10 different splice isoforms have been described for SCN5A, of which several harbour different functional properties. In the heart, two isoforms are mainly expressed (ratio 1:2), of which the least predominant one contains an extra glutamine at position 1077 (1077Q). Moreover, different isoforms are expressed during fetal life and adult, differing in the inclusion of an alternative exon 6.[8]
Protein structure and function
NaV1.5 is a large transmembrane protein with 4 repetitive transmembrane domains (DI-DIV), containing 6 transmembrane spanning sections each (S1-S6). The pore region of the channels, through which Na+-ions flow, are formed by the segments S5 and S6 of the 4 domains. Voltage sensing is mediated by the remaining segments, of which the positively charged S4 segments plays a fundamental role.[5][9]
NaV1.5 channels predominantly mediate the sodium current (INa) in cardiac cells. INa is responsible for the fast upstroke of the action potential, and as such plays a crucial role in impulse propagation through the heart. The conformational state of the channel, which is both voltage and time-dependent, determines whether the channel is opened or closed. At the resting membrane potential (around -85 mV), NaV1.5 channels are closed. Upon a stimulus (through conduction by a neighboring cell), the membrane depolarizes and NaV1.5 channels open through the outward movement of the S4 segments, leading to the initiation of the action potential. Simultaneously, a process called 'fast inactivation' results in closure of the channels within a few milliseconds. In physiological conditions, when inactivated, channels remain in closed state until the cell membrane repolarizes, where a recovery from inactivation is necessary before they become available for activation again. During the action potential, a very small fraction of sodium current persists and does not inactivate completely. This current is called 'sustained current', 'late current' or 'INa,L’.[10][11]
Also, some channels may reactivate during the repolarizing phase of the action potential at a range of potentials where inactivation is not complete and shows overlap with activation, generating the so-called "window current".[12]
Sub-units and protein interaction partners
Trafficking, function and structure of NaV1.5 can be affected by the many protein interaction partners that have been identified to date (for an extensive review, see Abriel et al. 2010).[13] Of these, the 4 sodium channel beta-subunits, encoded by the genes SCN1B, SCN2B, SCN3B and SCN4B, form an important category. In general, beta-subunits increase function of NaV1.5, either by change in intrinsic properties or by affecting the process of trafficking to the cell surface.
Mutations in SCN5A, which could result in a loss and/or a gain-of-function of the channel, are associated with a spectrum of cardiac diseases. Pathogenic mutations generally exhibit an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern, although compound heterozygote forms of SCN5A mutations are also described. Also, mutations may act as a disease modifier, especially in families where lack of direct causality is reflected by complex inheritance patterns. A significant number of individuals (2-7%) in the general population carry a rare (population frequency <1%),[16] protein-altering variant in the gene, highlighting the complexity of linking mutations directly with observed phenotypes. Mutations that result in the same biophysical effect can give rise to different diseases.
Mutations resulting in a gain-of-function are causal for Long QT syndrome type 3[19][26] and are also more recently implicated in multifocal ectopic Purkinje-related premature contractions (MEPPC)[23][27] Some gain-of-function mutations are also associated with AF and DCM.[28] Gain-of-function of NaV1.5 is generally reflected by an increase in INa,L, a slowed rate of inactivation or a shift in voltage dependence of activation or inactivation (resulting in an increased window-current).
SCN5A mutations are believed to be found in a disproportionate number of people who have Irritable Bowel Syndrome, particularly the constipation-predominant variant (IBS-C).[7][29] The resulting defect leads to disruption in bowel function, by affecting the Nav1.5 channel, in smooth muscle of the colon and pacemaker cells.[7] Researchers managed to treat a case of IBS-C with mexiletine to restore Nav1.5 channels, reversing constipation and abdominal pain.[30][unreliable medical source][31]
SCN5A variations in the general population
Genetic variations in SCN5A, i.e. single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have been described in both coding and non-coding regions of the gene. These variations are typically present at relatively high frequencies within the general population. Genome Wide Association Studies (GWAS) have used this type of common genetic variation to identify genetic loci associated with variability in phenotypic traits. In the cardiovascular field this powerful technique has been used to detect loci involved in variation in electrocardiographic parameters (i.e. PR-, QRS- and QTc-interval duration) in the general population.[16] The rationale behind this technique is that common genetic variation present in the general population can influence cardiac conduction in non-diseased individuals. these studies consistently identified the SCN5A-SCN10A genomic region on chromosome 3 to be associated with variation in QTc-interval, QRS duration and PR-interval.[16] These results indicate that genetic variation at the SCN5A locus is not only involved in disease genetics but also plays a role in the variation in cardiac function between individuals in the general population.
NaV1.5 as a pharmacological target
The cardiac sodium channel NaV1.5 has long been a common target in the pharmacologic treatment of arrhythmic events. Classically, sodium channel blockers that block the peak sodium current are classified as Class I anti-arrhythmic agents and further subdivided in class IA, IB and IC, depending on their ability to change the length of the cardiac action potential.[32][33] Use of such sodium channel blockers is among others indicated in patients with ventricular reentrant tachyarrhythmia in the setting of cardiac ischemia and in patients with atrial fibrillation in absence of structural heart disease.[33]
^Schroeter A, Walzik S, Blechschmidt S, Haufe V, Benndorf K, Zimmer T (July 2010). "Structure and function of splice variants of the cardiac voltage-gated sodium channel Na(v)1.5". Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology. 49 (1): 16–24. doi:10.1016/j.yjmcc.2010.04.004. PMID20398673.
^Attwell D, Cohen I, Eisner D, Ohba M, Ojeda C (March 1979). "The steady state TTX-sensitive ("window") sodium current in cardiac Purkinje fibres". Pflügers Archiv. 379 (2): 137–142. doi:10.1007/bf00586939. PMID571107. S2CID9145214.
^ abAbriel H (January 2010). "Cardiac sodium channel Na(v)1.5 and interacting proteins: Physiology and pathophysiology". Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology. 48 (1): 2–11. doi:10.1016/j.yjmcc.2009.08.025. PMID19744495.
^ abRemme CA, Verkerk AO, Nuyens D, van Ginneken AC, van Brunschot S, Belterman CN, et al. (December 2006). "Overlap syndrome of cardiac sodium channel disease in mice carrying the equivalent mutation of human SCN5A-1795insD". Circulation. 114 (24): 2584–2594. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.653949. PMID17145985. S2CID10008930.
^Schott JJ, Alshinawi C, Kyndt F, Probst V, Hoorntje TM, Hulsbeek M, et al. (September 1999). "Cardiac conduction defects associate with mutations in SCN5A". Nature Genetics. 23 (1): 20–21. doi:10.1038/12618. PMID10471492. S2CID7595466.
^Verstraelen TE, Ter Bekke RM, Volders PG, Masclee AA, Kruimel JW (July 2015). "The role of the SCN5A-encoded channelopathy in irritable bowel syndrome and other gastrointestinal disorders". Neurogastroenterology and Motility. 27 (7): 906–913. doi:10.1111/nmo.12569. PMID25898860. S2CID5055360.
^Beyder A, Strege PR, Bernard CE, Mazzone A, Tester DJ, Saito YA, et al. (September 2013). "Mexiletine rescues dysfunction of the Nav1.5 mutation A997t and restores bowel function in a patient with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS)". Neurogastroenterology and Motility. Vol. 25. Hoboken NJ: Wiley-Blackwell. p. 6.
^Milne JR, Hellestrand KJ, Bexton RS, Burnett PJ, Debbas NM, Camm AJ (February 1984). "Class 1 antiarrhythmic drugs--characteristic electrocardiographic differences when assessed by atrial and ventricular pacing". European Heart Journal. 5 (2): 99–107. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a061633. PMID6723689.
^ abBalser JR (April 2001). "The cardiac sodium channel: gating function and molecular pharmacology". Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology. 33 (4): 599–613. doi:10.1006/jmcc.2000.1346. PMID11273715. S2CID35893248.
Further reading
Viswanathan PC, Balser JR (January 2004). "Inherited sodium channelopathies: a continuum of channel dysfunction". Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine. 14 (1): 28–35. doi:10.1016/j.tcm.2003.10.001. PMID14720472.
Catterall WA, Goldin AL, Waxman SG (December 2005). "International Union of Pharmacology. XLVII. Nomenclature and structure-function relationships of voltage-gated sodium channels". Pharmacological Reviews. 57 (4): 397–409. doi:10.1124/pr.57.4.4. PMID16382098. S2CID7332624.
Wolf CM, Berul CI (April 2006). "Inherited conduction system abnormalities--one group of diseases, many genes". Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology. 17 (4): 446–455. doi:10.1111/j.1540-8167.2006.00427.x. PMID16643374. S2CID21847457.