1929 Ontario general election
Canadian provincial election
1929 Ontario general election
The 1929 Ontario general election was the 18th general election held in the Province of Ontario , Canada. It was held on October 30, 1929, to elect the 112 Members of the 18th Legislative Assembly of Ontario ("MLAs").[ 1]
Campaign
Every party, including the Ontario Prohibition Union and the English Language School League, issued their own manifesto during the campaign, to the extent that the Press called it the "battle of the manifestos".
The Liberals continued to use their strategy from the previous election of coordinating their efforts with other pro-temperance forces in order to minimize vote splits .
Only the Conservatives fielded candidates in all ridings, and eight of them were returned by acclamation . In 21 two-way contests, the Liberals declined to field a candidate in favour of an ally considered more likely to gain votes. There were only 16 three-cornered races and 2 four-way battles.
Riding contests, by number of candidates (1929)
Candidates
Con
Lib
Prog
L-P
UFO
Lab
I-Con
Comm
Ind
Proh
Total
1
8
8
2
86
65
4
4
2
2
3
6
172
3
16
16
5
1
1
2
4
1
2
48
4
2
2
2
1
1
8
Total
112
83
9
4
3
3
7
5
2
8
236
Outcome
The Ontario Conservative Party , led by George Howard Ferguson , was elected for a third consecutive term in government with an increased majority in the Legislature.
The Ontario Liberal Party , led by W.E.N. Sinclair , lost one seat, but continued to form the official opposition .
Conservative gains came at the expense of the Progressive Party and the United Farmers of Ontario .
Earl Hutchinson of Kenora is the sole Labour MLA elected.
Results
Elections to the 18th Parliament of Ontario (1929)
Political party
Party leader
MPPs
Votes
Candidates
1926
Dissol.
1929
±
#
%
± (pp)
Conservative
Howard Ferguson
112
73
72
90
17
574,730
56.66%
0.79
Liberal
W.E.N. Sinclair
83
13
14
11
2
319,487
31.50%
14.33
Progressive
William Raney
9
10
8
4
6
30,795
3.04%
3.26
Liberal–Progressive
4
5
4
3
2
17,966
1.77%
2.47
United Farmers
Leslie Oke
3
3
3
1
2
12,752
1.26%
0.08
Labour
3
1
1
1
8,664
0.85%
0.44
Independent Conservative
7
1
2
2
1
21,950
2.16%
0.40
Independent Liberal
–
4
3
–
4
Did not campaign
Independent Progressive
–
1
1
–
1
Did not campaign
Liberal-Prohibitionist
–
1
1
–
1
Did not campaign
Prohibitionist
8
–
–
–
–
25,807
2.54%
5.52
Communist
5
–
–
–
–
1,542
0.15%
New
Independent
2
–
–
–
587
0.06%
New
Liberal-Labour
–
–
–
–
Did not campaign
Progressive-Liberal
–
–
–
–
Did not campaign
Liberal-Labour-Prohibitionist
–
–
–
–
Did not campaign
Vacant
3
Total
236
112
112
112
1,014,310
100.00%
Blank and invalid ballots
7,720
Registered voters / turnout
1,804,932
56.62%
7.33
Synopsis of results
Results by riding - 1929 Ontario general election
Riding
Winning party
Turnout[ a 1]
Votes
#
Name
1926
Party
Votes
Share
Margin #
Margin %
Con
Lib
Prog
Proh
I-Con
L-Prog
UFO
Labour
Comm
Ind
Total
001
Addington
Con
Con
4,273
67.47%
2,213
34.94%
61.09%
4,273
2,060
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
6,333
002
Algoma
Con
Con
4,565
67.49%
2,366
34.98%
63.45%
4,565
2,199
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
6,764
003
Brant County
Prog
Prog
3,831
53.42%
490
6.83%
71.65%
3,341
–
3,831
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
7,172
004
Brantford
Con
Con
7,740
57.93%
2,119
15.86%
65.98%
7,740
5,621
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
13,361
005
Brockville
Con
Con
4,633
60.73%
1,637
21.46%
61.22%
4,633
2,996
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
7,629
006
Bruce North
Lib
Lib
4,520
52.09%
362
4.17%
70.52%
4,158
4,520
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
8,678
007
Bruce South
Prog
Lib
4,983
53.04%
571
6.08%
69.43%
4,412
4,983
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
9,395
008
Carleton
Con
Con
3,781
67.16%
1,932
34.32%
47.76%
3,781
–
–
1,849
–
–
–
–
–
–
5,630
009
Cochrane North
Con
Con
3,121
43.60%
587
8.20%
63.76%
3,121
1,298
–
–
2,534
–
–
–
–
205
7,158
010
Cochrane South
Con
Con
5,686
52.76%
594
5.51%
57.02%
5,686
5,092
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
10,778
011
Dufferin
Prog
Prog
3,778
50.30%
45
0.60%
76.42%
3,733
–
3,778
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
7,511
012
Dundas
L-Proh
Con
3,362
44.31%
999
13.17%
73.23%
3,362
1,862
–
2,363
–
–
–
–
–
–
7,587
013
Durham
Lib
Lib
5,860
50.04%
10
0.09%
71.73%
5,850
5,860
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
11,710
014
Elgin East
Lib
Con
4,068
51.83%
288
3.67%
76.56%
4,068
3,780
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
7,848
015
Elgin West
Con
Con
6,579
56.17%
1,445
12.34%
63.29%
6,579
5,134
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
11,713
016
Essex North
Con
Con
8,043
55.97%
1,715
11.93%
63.61%
8,043
6,328
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
14,371
017
Essex South
Lib
Con
4,548
53.09%
529
6.17%
65.84%
4,548
4,019
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
8,567
018
Fort William
Con
Con
5,467
58.73%
1,626
17.47%
62.52%
5,467
3,841
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
9,308
019
Frontenac—Lennox
Lib
Con
4,419
54.77%
769
9.53%
66.19%
4,419
3,650
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
8,069
020
Glengarry
Con
Lib
3,290
50.34%
45
0.69%
61.20%
3,245
3,290
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
6,535
021
Grenville
Con
Con
4,452
64.81%
2,035
29.63%
65.93%
4,452
–
–
2,417
–
–
–
–
–
–
6,869
022
Grey North
Prog
Prog
6,912
52.15%
571
4.31%
68.85%
6,341
–
6,912
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
13,253
023
Grey South
UFO
UFO
6,607
53.07%
764
6.14%
71.06%
5,843
–
–
–
–
–
6,607
–
–
–
12,450
024
Haldimand
Lib
Con
4,993
50.14%
28
0.28%
74.85%
4,993
4,965
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
9,958
025
Halton
Con
L-Prog
5,696
50.32%
72
0.64%
68.70%
5,624
–
–
–
–
5,696
–
–
–
–
11,320
026
Hamilton Centre
Con
Con
7,568
75.54%
5,117
51.07%
46.44%
7,568
2,451
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
10,019
027
Hamilton East
Con
Con
8,287
62.64%
3,818
28.86%
53.20%
8,287
4,469
–
–
–
–
–
–
473
–
13,229
028
Hamilton West
Con
Con
6,974
75.93%
4,763
51.86%
51.54%
6,974
2,211
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
9,185
029
Hastings East
Con
Con
acclaimed
030
Hastings North
Con
Con
acclaimed
031
Hastings West
Con
Con
5,304
66.20%
2,596
32.40%
56.13%
5,304
2,708
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
8,012
032
Huron North
Lib
Lib
5,795
57.18%
1,455
14.36%
69.69%
4,340
5,795
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
10,135
033
Huron South
Prog
Prog
4,785
50.17%
32
0.34%
66.20%
4,753
–
4,785
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
9,538
034
Kent East
Prog
Con
3,157
38.56%
435
5.31%
69.32%
3,157
2,722
2,309
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
8,188
035
Kent West
Con
Con
6,911
50.81%
221
1.62%
58.71%
6,911
6,690
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
13,601
036
Kenora
Con
Lab
3,528
53.04%
404
6.07%
68.32%
3,124
–
–
–
–
–
–
3,528
–
–
6,652
037
Kingston
Con
Con
acclaimed
038
Lambton East
UFO
Con
4,632
43.93%
775
7.35%
68.67%
4,632
2,056
–
–
–
–
3,857
–
–
–
10,545
039
Lambton West
Con
Con
5,724
54.97%
1,035
9.94%
61.88%
5,724
4,689
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
10,413
040
Lanark North
Con
Con
4,038
56.64%
947
13.28%
73.69%
4,038
3,091
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
7,129
041
Lanark South
Con
Con
4,308
57.40%
1,111
14.80%
67.06%
4,308
3,197
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
7,505
042
Leeds
Con
Con
3,755
49.27%
1,550
20.34%
73.69%
3,755
2,205
–
1,661
–
–
–
–
–
–
7,621
043
Lincoln
Prog
Con
3,557
43.42%
668
8.15%
71.09%
3,557
2,889
1,746
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
8,192
044
London North
Con
Con
6,221
68.04%
3,299
36.08%
47.12%
6,221
–
–
2,922
–
–
–
–
–
–
9,143
045
London South
Con
Con
6,801
58.48%
1,972
16.96%
52.76%
6,801
–
–
–
–
–
–
4,829
–
–
11,630
046
Manitoulin
UFO
Con
2,291
50.03%
3
0.07%
74.57%
2,291
–
–
–
–
–
2,288
–
–
–
4,579
047
Middlesex North
I-Prog
Con
5,288
50.80%
167
1.60%
70.40%
5,288
5,121
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
10,409
048
Middlesex West
Prog
Con
3,371
34.81%
186
1.92%
72.71%
3,371
3,129
3,185
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
9,685
049
Muskoka
Con
Con
acclaimed
050
Niagara Falls
Con
Con
6,713
64.94%
3,088
29.87%
45.50%
6,713
3,625
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
10,338
051
Nipissing
Con
Con
4,859
57.99%
1,339
15.98%
62.41%
4,859
3,520
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
8,379
052
Norfolk
Con
Con
7,206
55.39%
1,403
10.78%
78.42%
7,206
5,803
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
13,009
053
Northumberland
Lib
Con
7,108
52.52%
683
5.05%
70.09%
7,108
6,425
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
13,533
054
Ontario North
Prog
Con
3,072
47.33%
876
13.50%
71.69%
3,072
1,222
2,196
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
6,490
055
Ontario South
Lib
Lib
9,791
53.80%
1,383
7.60%
65.35%
8,408
9,791
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
18,199
056
Ottawa East
I-Lib
Con
7,813
57.72%
2,089
15.43%
50.47%
7,813
5,724
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
13,537
057
Ottawa North
Con
Con
5,198
67.64%
2,711
35.28%
29.30%
5,198
2,487
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
7,685
058
Ottawa South
Con
Con
acclaimed
059
Oxford North
L-Prog
L-Prog
5,449
50.47%
102
0.94%
70.82%
5,347
–
–
–
–
5,449
–
–
–
–
10,796
060
Oxford South
L-Prog
Lib
5,217
52.49%
495
4.98%
72.03%
4,722
5,217
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
9,939
061
Parry Sound
Con
Con
4,507
56.48%
1,034
12.96%
61.37%
4,507
3,473
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
7,980
062
Peel
Con
Con
6,737
54.27%
1,060
8.54%
69.65%
6,737
5,677
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
12,414
063
Perth North
Con
Con
7,273
53.04%
834
6.08%
66.36%
7,273
6,439
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
13,712
064
Perth South
Lib
Con
3,428
44.73%
1,246
16.26%
71.07%
3,428
2,182
2,053
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
7,663
065
Peterborough City
Con
Con
5,931
51.97%
450
3.94%
69.89%
5,931
5,481
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
11,412
066
Peterborough County
Lib
Con
3,117
50.23%
29
0.47%
70.71%
3,117
3,088
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
6,205
067
Port Arthur
Con
Con
acclaimed
068
Prescott
I-Lib
I-Con
3,996
43.15%
968
10.45%
76.93%
3,028
2,236
–
–
3,996
–
–
–
–
–
9,260
069
Prince Edward
Prog
Con
4,457
53.72%
617
7.44%
80.37%
4,457
–
–
3,840
–
–
–
–
–
–
8,297
070
Rainy River
Con
I-Con
3,142
51.96%
237
3.92%
78.05%
2,905
–
–
–
3,142
–
–
–
–
–
6,047
071
Renfrew North
Con
Con
acclaimed
072
Renfrew South
Con
Lib
4,990
50.44%
87
0.88%
67.43%
4,903
4,990
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
9,893
073
Russell
I-Lib
Con
6,190
51.20%
291
2.41%
65.03%
6,190
5,899
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
12,089
074
St. Catharines
I-Con
Con
5,562
53.99%
822
7.98%
49.54%
5,562
–
–
–
4,740
–
–
–
–
–
10,302
075
Sault Ste. Marie
Con
Con
6,216
77.52%
4,413
55.03%
51.55%
6,216
1,803
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
8,019
076
Simcoe Centre
Con
Lib
5,199
51.08%
220
2.16%
77.06%
4,979
5,199
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
10,178
077
Simcoe East
Con
Con
7,980
61.63%
3,011
23.25%
70.75%
7,980
4,969
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
12,949
078
Simcoe Southwest
L-Prog
Con
6,213
54.44%
1,013
8.88%
69.56%
6,213
5,200
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
11,413
079
Stormont
Con
Con
6,546
76.82%
4,571
53.64%
52.29%
6,546
–
–
–
1,975
–
–
–
–
–
8,521
080
Sturgeon Falls
I-Lib
Con
3,051
58.92%
924
17.84%
67.64%
3,051
2,127
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
5,178
081
Sudbury
Con
Con
acclaimed
082
Temiskaming
Con
Con
4,888
58.21%
1,379
16.42%
62.70%
4,888
3,509
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
8,397
083
Victoria North
L-Prog
L-Prog
3,139
50.25%
31
0.50%
72.72%
3,108
–
–
–
–
3,139
–
–
–
–
6,247
084
Victoria South
L-Prog
Con
4,607
55.38%
895
10.76%
72.91%
4,607
–
–
–
–
3,712
–
–
–
–
8,319
085
Waterloo North
Con
Lib
6,080
36.92%
395
2.40%
56.76%
5,685
6,080
–
–
4,704
–
–
–
–
–
16,469
086
Waterloo South
Lab
Con
7,707
55.77%
1,595
11.54%
62.88%
7,707
6,112
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
13,819
087
Welland
Con
Con
6,663
71.54%
4,012
43.07%
52.08%
6,663
2,651
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
9,314
088
Wellington Northeast
Lib
Lib
6,288
63.95%
2,744
27.91%
71.75%
3,544
6,288
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
9,832
089
Wellington South
Con
Con
7,554
55.39%
1,471
10.79%
67.84%
7,554
–
–
6,083
–
–
–
–
–
–
13,637
090
Wentworth North
Con
Con
4,750
56.31%
1,372
16.27%
31.83%
4,750
3,378
–
–
–
–
–
307
–
–
8,435
091
Wentworth South
Con
Con
8,460
71.59%
5,102
43.17%
51.49%
8,460
3,358
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
11,818
092
Windsor East
Con
Con
6,224
65.25%
3,247
34.84%
36.98%
6,224
2,977
–
–
–
–
–
–
337
–
9,538
093
Windsor West
Con
Con
6,419
64.11%
2,825
38.94%
37.71%
6,419
3,594
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
10,013
094
Beaches
Con
Con
8,034
75.55%
5,434
51.10%
40.40%
8,034
2,600
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
10,634
095
Woodbine
Con
Con
6,839
79.56%
5,082
59.12%
35.55%
6,839
1,757
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
8,596
096
Greenwood
Con
Con
5,783
79.04%
4,249
58.07%
35.97%
5,783
1,534
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
7,317
097
Riverdale
Con
Con
5,604
72.70%
3,500
45.41%
36.98%
5,604
2,104
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
7,708
098
Eglinton
Con
Con
10,009
59.30%
3,140
18.60%
47.39%
10,009
6,869
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
16,878
099
St. David
Con
Con
7,199
74.60%
4,748
49.20%
36.97%
7,199
2,451
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
9,650
100
St. George
Con
Con
6,450
68.76%
3,520
37.53%
33.04%
6,450
2,930
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
9,380
101
St. Patrick
Con
Con
4,473
66.77%
3,231
48.23%
46.22%
4,473
1,242
–
–
859
–
–
–
125
–
6,699
102
St. Andrews
Con
Con
3,436
63.64%
1,473
27.28%
37.71%
3,436
1,963
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
5,399
103
Bellwoods
Con
Con
5,114
74.40%
3,749
54.54%
35.11%
5,114
1,365
–
–
–
–
–
–
395
–
6,874
104
Bracondale
Con
Con
7,108
70.54%
4,352
43.19%
42.79%
7,108
2,756
–
–
–
–
–
–
212
–
10,076
105
Dovercourt
Con
Con
4,316
66.94%
2,184
33.87%
43.98%
4,316
2,132
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
6,448
106
Brockton
Con
Con
8,731
71.06%
5,176
42.13%
40.42%
8,731
3,555
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
12,286
107
Parkdale
Con
Con
6,203
70.48%
3,987
45.30%
45.52%
6,203
2,216
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
382
8,801
108
High Park
Con
Con
8,447
64.39%
3,775
28.78%
48.30%
8,447
–
–
4,672
–
–
–
–
–
–
13,119
109
York East
Con
Con
9,619
64.42%
4,307
28.85%
42.86%
9,619
5,312
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
14,931
110
York North
Lib
Con
5,448
50.91%
195
1.82%
75.67%
5,448
5,253
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
10,701
111
York South
Con
Con
7,862
68.64%
4,270
37.28%
36.85%
7,862
3,592
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
11,454
112
York West
Con
Con
8,296
65.29%
3,885
30.57%
44.67%
8,296
4,411
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
12,707
^ including spoilt ballots
= turnout is above provincial average
= incumbent re-elected under the same party banner
= incumbent switched allegiance for the election
= incumbency arose from byelection gain
= other incumbents renominated
Resulting composition of the 18th Legislative Assembly of Ontario
Source
Party
Con
Lib
Prog
L-P
UFO
Lab
I-Con
Total
Seats retained
Incumbents returned
47
4
4
2
1
58
Open seats held
11
1
12
Acclamation
8
8
Seats changing hands
Incumbents defeated
18
2
1
1
1
23
Open seats gained
3
3
1
7
Byelection gain held
1
1
Ouster of byelection gain by third party
1
1
Change in affiliation
2
2
Total
90
11
4
3
1
1
2
112
Seats that changed hands
Elections to the 18th Parliament of Ontario – seats won/lost by party, 1926–1929
Party
1926
Gain from (loss to)
1929
Con
Lib
Pro
L-Pro
UFO
Lab
I-Lib
I-Con
I-Pro
L-Prb
Conservative
73
8
(4)
5
2
(1)
2
1
(1)
3
1
(1)
1
1
90
Liberal
13
4
(8)
1
1
11
Progressive
10
(5)
(1)
4
Liberal–Progressive
5
1
(2)
(1)
3
United Farmers
3
(2)
1
Labour
1
1
(1)
1
Independent-Liberal
4
(3)
(1)
–
Independent-Conservative
1
1
(1)
1
2
Independent-Progressive
1
(1)
–
Liberal-Prohibitionist
1
(1)
–
Total
112
7
(24)
8
(6)
6
–
3
(1)
2
–
1
(1)
4
–
1
(2)
1
–
1
–
112
There were 35 seats that changed allegiance in the election:
Conservative to Liberal
Conservative to Liberal-Progressive
Conservative to Labour
Conservative to Independent-Conservative
Liberal to Conservative
Progressive to Conservative
Progressive to Liberal
Liberal-Progressive to Conservative
Liberal-Progressive to Liberal
UFO to Conservative
Labour to Conservative
Independent-Liberal to Conservative
Independent-Liberal to Independent-Conservative
Independent-Conservative to Conservative
Independent-Progressive to Conservative
Liberal-Prohibitionist to Conservative
Notes
References
See also
Further reading