1890 Ontario general election
1890 Ontario general election
The 1890 Ontario general election was the seventh general election held in the Province of Ontario , Canada. It was held on June 5, 1890, to elect the 91 members of the 7th Legislative Assembly of Ontario ("MLAs").[ 1]
The Assembly had been increased from 90 members after the passage of an Act in 1889 creating Nipissing as a riding.[ 2]
The election was a victory for the Ontario Liberal Party , led by Oliver Mowat .[ 3] The party won a sixth consecutive term in government, despite losing a small number of seats in the Legislature.
The Ontario Conservative Party , led by William Ralph Meredith won two additional seats.
This election was held partially using the Limited voting system where each Toronto voter had two votes for the three MPPs in the district. This produced mixed representation in that district and thus a degree of minority representation.[ 4]
A key issue in the election was the segregation of schools for Catholic and Protestant students, with the Liberal Party supporting the segregation and the Conservatives opposing it.[ 3]
An 1887 Act had renamed the riding of Cornwall and Stormont as Stormont .[ 5]
Results
Synopsis of results
Results by riding - 1890 Ontario general election[ 1]
Riding[ a 1]
Winning party
Turnout
Votes
Name[ a 2]
1886
Party
Votes
Share
Margin #
Margin %
Lib
Con
EqR
I-Lib
Ind
Total
Addington
Con
Con
1,498
51.48%
86
2.96%
62.05%
1,412
1,498
–
–
–
2,910
Algoma East
Lib
Con
1,569
50.97%
60
1.95%
110.54%
1,509
1,569
–
–
–
3,078
Algoma West
Lib
Lib
786
51.95%
59
3.90%
116.85%
786
727
–
–
–
1,513
Brant North
Lib
Lib
1,178
64.20%
521
28.39%
66.55%
1,178
657
–
–
–
1,835
Brant South
Lib
Lib
2,067
59.06%
634
18.11%
65.02%
2,067
1,433
–
–
–
3,500
Brockville
Lib
Lib
1,781
52.37%
161
4.73%
62.44%
1,781
–
–
1,620
–
3,401
Bruce Centre
Lib
Lib
1,860
54.56%
311
9.12%
69.74%
1,860
–
1,549
–
–
3,409
Bruce North
Con
Con
1,835
50.23%
17
0.47%
70.83%
1,818
1,835
–
–
–
3,653
Bruce South
Lib
Lib
2,179
64.41%
975
28.82%
64.86%
2,179
1,204
–
–
–
3,383
Cardwell
Con
Con
1,183
50.97%
45
1.94%
41.81%
–
2,321[ a 3]
–
–
–
2,321
Carleton
Con
Con
1,145
50.20%
9
0.39%
45.56%
1,136
1,145
–
–
–
2,281
Stormont
Lib
Lib
2,262
54.27%
356
8.54%
68.38%
2,262
1,906
–
–
–
4,168
Dufferin
Con
C-ER
1,333
54.70%
730
29.95%
40.18%
603
–
1,834[ a 4]
–
–
2,437
Dundas
Lib
Con
2,104
51.92%
156
3.85%
78.15%
1,948
2,104
–
–
–
4,052
Durham East
Con
C-ER
1,314
50.19%
10
0.38%
55.35%
–
1,304
1,314
–
–
2,618
Durham West
Lib
Lib
1,694
50.76%
51
1.53%
73.21%
1,694
1,643
–
–
–
3,337
Elgin East
Lib
Con
2,038
51.49%
118
2.98%
74.29%
1,920
2,038
–
–
–
3,958
Elgin West
Con
Con
2,384
52.02%
185
4.04%
67.70%
2,199
2,384
–
–
–
4,583
Essex North
Lib
Con
1,901
47.90%
635
16.00%
58.22%
2,068[ a 5]
1,901
–
–
–
3,969
Essex South
Lib
Lib
2,505
52.15%
207
4.31%
73.61%
2,505
2,298
–
–
–
4,803
Frontenac
Con
Con
1,258
52.03%
98
4.05%
65.67%
1,160
1,258
–
–
–
2,418
Glengarry
Lib
Lib
1,756
53.96%
258
7.93%
66.38%
1,756
1,498
–
–
–
3,254
Grenville
Con
Con
1,611
57.33%
412
14.66%
48.87%
–
2,810[ a 6]
–
–
–
2,810
Grey Centre
Con
Con
1,513
52.48%
143
4.96%
48.76%
1,370
1,513
–
–
–
2,883
Grey North
Con
Lib
2,312
54.44%
377
8.88%
67.88%
2,312
1,935
–
–
–
4,247
Grey South
Con
Lib
2,156
51.73%
144
3.45%
72.98%
2,156
2,012
–
–
–
4,168
Haldimand
Lib
Lib
2,000
54.54%
333
9.08%
81.00%
2,000
1,667
–
–
–
3,667
Halton
Con
Con
2,377
51.98%
181
3.96%
78.53%
2,196
2,377
–
–
–
4,573
Hamilton
Lib
Con
4,111
50.53%
86
1.06%
78.54%
4,025
4,111
–
–
–
8,136
Hastings East
Con
Con
1,801
50.13%
9
0.25%
79.49%
1,792
1,801
–
–
–
3,593
Hastings North
Con
Con
acclaimed
Hastings West
Con
Lib
1,678
52.11%
136
4.22%
64.41%
1,678
1,542
–
–
–
3,220
Huron East
Lib
Lib
2,256
56.27%
503
12.55%
73.87%
2,256
1,753
–
–
–
4,009
Huron South
Lib
Lib
2,144
51.91%
158
3.83%
68.23%
2,144
1,986
–
–
–
4,130
Huron West
Lib
Lib
2,125
51.35%
112
2.71%
64.60%
2,125
2,013
–
–
–
4,138
Kent East
Lib
Lib
2,347
53.99%
633
14.56%
88.46%
4,061[ a 7]
–
286
–
–
4,347
Kent West
Con
Con
2,823
50.37%
41
0.73%
65.34%
2,782
2,823
–
–
–
5,605
Kingston
Con
Con
1,629
50.45%
29
0.90%
58.16%
1,600
1,629
–
–
–
3,229
Lambton East
Lib
Lib
2,203
52.40%
462
10.99%
73.65%
2,203
1,741
260
–
–
4,204
Lambton West
Lib
Lib
2,748
55.46%
713
14.39%
56.04%
2,748
2,035
172
–
–
4,955
Lanark North
Lib
L-ER
1,525
53.30%
189
6.61%
71.27%
–
1,336
1,525[ a 8]
–
–
2,861
Lanark South
Con
Con
1,509
58.17%
431
16.62%
54.29%
1,078
1,509
–
–
7
2,594
Leeds
Con
Con
1,813
57.10%
451
14.20%
57.69%
1,362
1,813
–
–
–
3,175
Lennox
Con
Con
1,441
50.38%
22
0.77%
70.54%
1,419
1,441
–
–
–
2,860
Lincoln
Lib
Con
2,424
51.63%
153
3.26%
67.51%
2,271
2,424
–
–
–
4,695
London
Con
Con
acclaimed
Middlesex East
Con
Con
2,508
50.58%
58
1.17%
74.07%
2,450
2,508
–
–
–
4,958
Middlesex North
Lib
Lib
2,060
51.05%
85
2.11%
78.04%
2,060
1,975
–
–
–
4,035
Middlesex West
Lib
Lib
1,950
51.64%
124
3.28%
80.35%
1,950
1,826
–
–
–
3,776
Monck
Lib
Lib
1,765
56.83%
424
13.65%
71.30%
3,106[ a 9]
0
–
–
–
3,106
Muskoka
Con
Con
1,565
51.46%
89
2.93%
77.76%
1,476
1,565
–
–
–
3,041
Nipissing
New
Lib
881
67.25%
452
34.50%
64.56%
881
429
–
–
–
1,310
Norfolk North
Lib
Lib
1,601
55.30%
307
10.60%
72.46%
1,601
1,294
–
–
–
2,895
Norfolk South
Con
Lib
1,563
51.06%
65
2.12%
76.54%
1,563
1,498
–
–
–
3,061
Northumberland East
Con
Con
2,185
53.36%
275
6.72%
83.74%
1,910
2,185[ a 10]
–
–
–
4,095
Northumberland West
Lib
Lib
1,453
57.82%
393
15.64%
65.90%
1,453
1,060
–
–
–
2,513
Ontario North
Lib
Con
1,869
51.07%
78
2.13%
70.38%
1,791
1,869
–
–
–
3,660
Ontario South
Lib
Lib
2,460
51.38%
132
2.76%
73.43%
2,460
2,328
–
–
–
4,788
Ottawa
Lib
Lib
3,379
63.24%
1,415
26.48%
58.66%
3,379
–
1,964
–
–
5,343
Oxford North
Lib
Lib
acclaimed
Oxford South
Lib
Lib
1,764
64.69%
801
29.37%
44.21%
1,764
–
963
–
–
2,727
Parry Sound
Ind
Lib
1,387
52.06%
110
4.13%
n/a
1,387
1,277
–
–
–
2,664
Peel
Lib
Lib
2,059
51.54%
123
3.08%
74.33%
2,059
–
1,936
–
–
3,995
Perth North
Con
Lib
2,729
50.86%
92
1.71%
72.44%
2,729
2,637
–
–
–
5,366
Perth South
Lib
Lib
2,241
58.19%
631
16.39%
61.55%
2,241
–
1,610
–
–
3,851
Peterborough East
Lib
Lib
1,421
51.43%
79
2.86%
70.40%
1,421
–
1,342
–
–
2,763
Peterborough West
Lib
Lib
1,925
58.58%
564
17.16%
70.65%
1,925
–
1,361
–
–
3,286
Prescott
Lib
Lib
acclaimed
Prince Edward
Lib
Lib
2,040
50.09%
7
0.17%
71.71%
2,040
2,033
–
–
–
4,073
Renfrew North
Lib
Con
1,843
51.22%
88
2.45%
75.64%
1,755
1,843
–
–
–
3,598
Renfrew South
Lib
Lib
1,470
49.71%
229
7.74%
63.02%
2,711[ a 11]
–
246
–
–
2,957
Russell
Lib
Lib
2,223
61.56%
835
23.12%
57.36%
2,223
1,388
–
–
–
3,611
Simcoe Centre
Lib
Lib
1,559
57.72%
417
15.44%
60.03%
1,559
–
1,142
–
–
2,701
Simcoe East
Lib
Con
2,092
51.96%
158
3.92%
62.59%
1,934
2,092
–
–
–
4,026
Simcoe West
Con
Con
1,318
61.56%
495
23.12%
44.95%
823
1,318
–
–
–
2,141
Victoria East
Con
Con
1,459
51.26%
72
2.53%
55.05%
1,387
1,459
–
–
–
2,846
Victoria West
Con
L-ER
1,827
56.70%
432
13.41%
66.13%
–
1,395
1,827
–
–
3,222
Waterloo North
Lib
Lib
2,205
59.79%
722
19.58%
66.67%
2,205
1,483
–
–
–
3,688
Waterloo South
Lib
Lib
2,161
55.34%
417
10.68%
66.42%
2,161
1,744
–
–
–
3,905
Welland
Lib
Con
2,345
50.77%
71
1.54%
71.83%
2,274
2,345
–
–
–
4,619
Wellington East
Lib
Lib
1,562
58.61%
459
17.22%
53.37%
1,562
1,103
–
–
–
2,665
Wellington South
Lib
Lib
2,098
59.20%
652
18.40%
61.76%
2,098
1,446
–
–
–
3,544
Wellington West
Lib
Lib
1,495
55.70%
306
11.40%
58.64%
1,495
1,189
–
–
–
2,684
Wentworth North
Lib
Lib
1,469
55.43%
288
10.87%
72.58%
1,469
1,181
–
–
–
2,650
Wentworth South
Lib
Lib
1,472
50.88%
51
1.76%
81.96%
1,472
1,421
–
–
–
2,893
York East
Lib
Lib
1,705
58.94%
517
17.87%
63.29%
1,705
–
1,188
–
–
2,893
York North
Lib
Lib
1,875
61.29%
691
22.59%
47.87%
1,875
–
1,184
–
–
3,059
York West
Lib
Lib
1,789
50.87%
61
1.73%
94.73%
1,789
–
1,728
–
–
3,517
= open seat
= turnout is above provincial average
= winning candidate was in previous Legislature
= incumbent had switched allegiance
= previously incumbent in another riding
= not incumbent; was previously elected to the Legislature
= incumbency arose from byelection gain
= incumbency arose from prior election result being overturned by the court
= other incumbents renominated
= joint Conservative/Equal Rights candidate
= joint Liberal/Equal Rights candidate
= previously an MP in the House of Commons of Canada
= multiple candidates
^ plurality for third winning candidate
Analysis
Party candidates in 2nd place[ 1] [ a 1]
Party in 1st place
Party in 2nd place
Total
Accl
Lib
Con
C-ER
Ind-L
ER
Liberal
2
3
35
10
1
1
52
Conservative
2
28
2
32
C-ER
1
1
2
L-ER
2
2
Total
4
32
40
10
1
1
88
^ excluding Toronto seats
Candidates ranked 1st to 5th place, by party[ 1]
Parties
Accl
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
5th
█ Liberal
2
50
32
2
1
█ Conservative
2
31
41
█ Conservative/Equal Rights
2
10
1
█ Liberal/Equal Rights
2
█ Equal Rights
1
5
█ Independent Liberal
1
█ Independent
1
Resulting composition of the 2nd Legislative Assembly of Ontario[ 1]
Source
Party
Lib
Con
C-ER
L-ER
Total
Seats retained
Incumbents returned
36
14
50
Returned by acclamation
2
2
4
Open seats held
6
3
9
Byelection loss reversed
2
2
Defeated by same-party candidate
1
1
Seats changing hands
Incumbents defeated
5
9
1
15
Open seats gained
2
2
4
Byelection gains held
1
1
Incumbent changed allegiance
1
1
New seat
New MLAs
1
1
Toronto seats
MLA returned
2
2
New MLAs
1
1
Total
53
34
2
2
91
MLAs elected by region and riding
Party designations are as follows:
Liberal
Conservative
Conservative/Equal Rights
Liberal/Equal Rights
Northern Ontario
Ottawa Valley
Saint Lawrence Valley
Central Ontario
Georgian Bay
Wentworth/Halton/Niagara
Midwestern Ontario
Southwestern Ontario
Peel/York/Ontario
Seats that changed hands
In its first election, Nipissing returned the Liberal candidate John Loughrin as its MLA.
Elections to the 18th Parliament of Ontario – seats won/lost by party, 1886–1890
Party
1886
Gain from (loss to)
1890
Lib
Con
Con-ER
Lib-ER
Ind
Liberal
57
5
(10)
(1)
1
52
Conservative
32
10
(5)
(2)
(1)
34
Conservative-Equal Rights
–
2
2
Liberal-Equal Rights
–
1
1
2
Independent
1
(1)
–
Total
90
11
(6)
8
(10)
–
(2)
–
(2)
1
–
90
In the election, 20 seats changed their allegiance.
Liberal to Conservative
Liberal to Liberal-Equal Rights
Conservative to Liberal
Conservative to Conservative-Equal Rights
Conservative to Liberal-Equal Rights
Independent to Liberal
See also
Notes and references
Notes
^ Election declared void because of corrupt practices. Writ for new election issued. Campbell was reelected in the subsequent byelection.[ 6]
^ Election declared void because of corrupt practices. Writ for new election issued. David Porter (Liberal) was elected in the subsequent byelection.[ 6]
^ Election declared void because of corrupt practices. Writ for new election issued. John Morison Gibson (Liberal) was elected in the subsequent byelection.[ 6]
^ Died before assuming office. Writ for new election issued. Edwin Clarendon Carpenter (Liberal) was elected in the subsequent byelection.[ 6]
^ Election declared void because of corrupt practices. Writ for new election issued. Charlton was reelected in the subsequent byelection.[ 6]
^ Election declared void because of corrupt practices. Writ for new election issued. Thomas Magwood (Conservative) was elected in the subsequent byelection.[ 6]
References