1898 Ontario general election
Provincial election in Ontario, Canada
1898 Ontario general election
The 1898 Ontario general election was the ninth general election held in the province of Ontario , Canada. It was held on March 1, 1898, to elect the 94 Members of the 9th Legislative Assembly of Ontario ("MLAs").[ 1]
The Ontario Liberal Party , led by Arthur S. Hardy , won an eighth term in office with a clear majority – the Patrons of Industry and the Protestant Protective Association held no sway in this legislature.
The Ontario Conservative Party , led by Sir James P. Whitney , formed the official opposition .
Results
Synopsis of results
Results by riding - 1898 Ontario general election[ 1]
Riding[ a 1]
Winning party
Turnout
Votes
Name[ a 2]
1894
Party
Votes
Share
Margin #
Margin %
Lib
Con
I-Con
Lab
Ind
Total
Addington
Con
Con
1,901
54.30%
301
8.60%
74.61%
1,600
1,901
–
–
–
3,501
Algoma East
Lib
Lib
2,833
52.55%
275
5.10%
45.93%
2,833
2,558
–
–
–
5,391
Algoma West
Con
Lib
1,723
54.61%
291
9.22%
51.55%
1,723
1,432
–
–
–
3,155
Brant North
Lib
Lib
1,167
52.28%
102
4.57%
83.53%
1,167
1,065
–
–
–
2,232
Brant South
Lib
Lib
3,038
54.75%
527
9.50%
84.72%
3,038
2,511
–
–
–
5,549
Brockville
Lib
Lib
2,232
52.20%
188
4.40%
78.96%
2,232
2,044
–
–
–
4,276
Bruce Centre
L-PI
Lib
1,850
53.38%
234
6.75%
68.35%
1,850
–
–
–
1,616
3,466
Bruce North
L-PP
Lib
2,464
52.84%
265
5.68%
82.09%
2,464
2,199
–
–
–
4,663
Bruce South
Lib
Lib
acclaimed
Cardwell
C-PI
Con
2,267
55.63%
459
11.26%
70.72%
1,808
2,267
–
–
–
4,075
Carleton
C-PI
I-Con
1,740
63.64%
746
27.29%
55.38%
994
–
1,740
–
–
2,734
Dufferin
PI
Con
2,660
55.99%
569
11.98%
65.78%
–
2,660
–
–
2,091
4,751
Dundas
Con
Con
2,354
51.37%
126
2.75%
86.40%
2,228
2,354
–
–
–
4,582
Durham East
Con
Con
1,949
54.26%
306
8.52%
77.55%
1,643
1,949
–
–
–
3,592
Durham West
C-PP
Con
1,825
51.69%
119
3.37%
90.22%
1,706
1,825
–
–
–
3,531
Elgin East
Con
Con
2,267
50.32%
29
0.64%
82.75%
2,238
2,267
–
–
–
4,505
Elgin West
L-PI
Con
3,101
50.01%
1
0.02%
78.62%
3,100
3,101
–
–
–
6,201
Essex North
Lib
Lib
2,683
50.15%
95
1.78%
64.37%
2,683
2,588
–
–
79
5,350
Essex South
Lib
Lib
3,138
56.05%
677
12.09%
84.07%
3,138
2,461
–
–
–
5,599
Frontenac
L-PI
Con
1,936
53.73%
269
7.47%
75.44%
–
1,936
–
–
1,667
3,603
Glengarry
L-PI
Con
1,905
47.35%
466
11.58%
73.81%
679
1,905
–
–
1,439
4,023
Grenville
Con
Con
2,361
57.43%
611
14.86%
68.35%
1,750
2,361
–
–
–
4,111
Grey Centre
PPA
Con
2,813
58.58%
1,091
22.72%
73.97%
1,722
2,813
–
–
267
4,802
Grey North
Lib
Con
2,707
51.30%
137
2.60%
76.33%
2,570
2,707
–
–
–
5,277
Grey South
PI
Con
2,249
47.35%
532
11.20%
75.47%
1,717
2,249
–
–
784
4,750
Haldimand
Con
Lib
1,957
51.34%
102
2.68%
85.14%
1,957
1,855
–
–
–
3,812
Halton
Con
Lib
2,531
51.25%
123
2.49%
84.73%
2,531
2,408
–
–
–
4,939
Hamilton East
Lib
Con
3,247
57.84%
880
15.68%
82.88%
2,367
3,247
–
–
–
5,614
Hamilton West
Lib
Con
2,752
52.66%
278
5.32%
82.51%
2,474
2,752
–
–
–
5,226
Hastings East
L-PI
Lib
2,011
51.64%
128
3.29%
83.94%
2,011
1,883
–
–
–
3,894
Hastings North
PI
Con
2,374
52.80%
252
5.60%
99.91%
2,122
2,374
–
–
–
4,496
Hastings West
Lib
Con
1,985
52.67%
201
5.33%
67.44%
1,784
1,985
–
–
–
3,769
Huron East
Lib
Lib
2,417
55.74%
498
11.49%
74.69%
2,417
1,919
–
–
–
4,336
Huron South
Lib
Con
2,775
51.47%
159
2.95%
86.14%
2,616
2,775
–
–
–
5,391
Huron West
Lib
Lib
2,465
50.01%
1
0.02%
73.71%
2,465
2,464
–
–
–
4,929
Kent East
Lib
Lib
2,869
55.32%
552
10.64%
68.47%
2,869
2,317
–
–
–
5,186
Kent West
L-PI
Lib
3,689
51.99%
283
3.99%
78.63%
3,689
3,406
–
–
–
7,095
Kingston
Con
Lib
2,125
53.66%
290
7.32%
84.35%
2,125
1,835
–
–
–
3,960
Lambton East
IC-PP
Lib
2,361
49.21%
40
0.83%
78.40%
2,361
116
–
–
2,321
4,798
Lambton West
C-PP
Lib
3,600
53.73%
500
7.46%
68.13%
3,600
3,100
–
–
–
6,700
Lanark North
Con
Lib
1,989
52.38%
181
4.77%
82.92%
1,989
1,808
–
–
–
3,797
Lanark South
Con
Con
2,195
61.09%
797
22.18%
67.71%
1,398
2,195
–
–
–
3,593
Leeds
Con
Con
2,200
55.81%
458
11.62%
67.37%
1,742
2,200
–
–
–
3,942
Lennox
Con
Lib
1,677
50.65%
43
1.30%
78.74%
1,677
1,634
–
–
–
3,311
Lincoln
Con
Con
2,974
53.15%
353
6.31%
83.14%
–
5,595
–
–
–
5,595
London
Con
Lib
3,994
50.75%
301
3.82%
85.94%
3,994
3,693
–
57
126
7,870
Middlesex East
L-PP
Con
2,463
50.98%
95
1.97%
77.57%
2,368
2,463
–
–
–
4,831
Middlesex North
L-PI
Lib
2,195
51.07%
92
2.14%
79.80%
2,195
2,103
–
–
–
4,298
Middlesex West
Lib
Lib
2,262
51.73%
151
3.45%
84.79%
2,262
2,111
–
–
–
4,373
Monck
Lib
Lib
1,985
54.50%
328
9.01%
84.46%
1,985
1,657
–
–
–
3,642
Muskoka
C-PP
Lib
1,938
50.97%
74
1.95%
70.35%
1,938
1,864
–
–
–
3,802
Nipissing
Lib
Lib
1,590
50.98%
61
1.96%
97.47%
1,590
1,529
–
–
–
3,119
Norfolk North
Lib
Lib
1,885
53.55%
250
7.10%
81.09%
1,885
1,635
–
–
–
3,520
Norfolk South
Lib
Lib
1,723
50.50%
34
1.00%
84.02%
1,723
1,689
–
–
–
3,412
Northumberland East
Con
Lib
2,814
53.95%
412
7.90%
83.44%
2,814
2,402
–
–
–
5,216
Northumberland West
Lib
Lib
1,654
52.11%
134
4.22%
84.95%
1,654
1,520
–
–
–
3,174
Ontario North
Lib
Con
2,326
55.11%
431
10.21%
95.93%
1,895
2,326
–
–
–
4,221
Ontario South
Lib
Con
2,781
50.88%
96
1.76%
97.89%
2,685
2,781
–
–
–
5,466
Oxford North
Lib
Lib
2,838
53.99%
1,023
19.46%
76.32%
2,838
604
–
–
1,815
5,257
Oxford South
Lib
Lib
2,343
58.40%
674
16.80%
62.53%
2,343
1,669
–
–
–
4,012
Parry Sound
L-PI
Lib
2,332
65.52%
1,105
31.05%
90.05%
2,332
–
–
–
1,227
3,559
Peel
Lib
Lib
2,343
53.32%
292
6.65%
81.10%
2,343
2,051
–
–
–
4,394
Perth North
Con
Lib
3,396
51.21%
160
2.41%
87.03%
3,396
3,236
–
–
–
6,632
Perth South
L-PI
Lib
2,357
49.12%
4
0.08%
82.08%
2,357
2,353
–
–
88
4,798
Peterborough East
Lib
Lib
1,771
53.25%
216
6.49%
70.55%
1,771
1,555
–
–
–
3,326
Peterborough West
Lib
Lib
2,742
61.14%
999
22.27%
82.06%
2,742
1,743
–
–
–
4,485
Prescott
Lib
Lib
acclaimed
Prince Edward
L-PI
Con
2,387
53.96%
357
8.07%
78.17%
7
2,387
–
–
2,030
4,424
Renfrew North
Lib
Con
2,321
51.70%
153
3.41%
82.63%
2,168
2,321
–
–
–
4,489
Renfrew South
Lib
Lib
2,455
55.21%
1,441
32.40%
72.25%
2,455
978
–
–
1,014
4,447
Russell
Lib
Lib
2,738
58.26%
776
16.51%
70.52%
2,738
1,962
–
–
–
4,700
Simcoe Centre
Lib
Con
1,761
43.65%
57
1.41%
77.32%
1,704
1,761
–
–
569
4,034
Simcoe East
Con
Con
2,593
50.67%
69
1.35%
99.96%
2,524
2,593
–
–
–
5,117
Simcoe West
L-PI
Con
2,015
56.05%
435
12.10%
65.83%
1,580
2,015
–
–
–
3,595
Stormont
L-PI
Con
2,125
43.16%
182
3.70%
71.01%
1,943
2,125
–
–
855
4,923
Toronto East
C-PP
Con
3,103
67.78%
1,628
35.56%
67.37%
1,475
3,103
–
–
–
4,578
Toronto North
Con
Con
3,513
50.24%
34
0.49%
97.76%
3,479
3,513
–
–
–
6,992
Toronto South
Con
Con
4,464
52.38%
405
4.75%
67.83%
4,059
4,464
–
–
–
8,523
Toronto West
Con
Con
3,698
55.73%
760
11.45%
95.31%
2,938
3,698
–
–
–
6,636
Victoria East
Con
Con
2,289
55.29%
438
10.58%
69.88%
1,851
2,289
–
–
–
4,140
Victoria West
Lib
Con
2,163
50.82%
70
1.64%
74.02%
2,093
2,163
–
–
–
4,256
Waterloo North
Lib
Con
2,701
50.61%
65
1.22%
75.18%
2,636
2,701
–
–
–
5,337
Waterloo South
Lib
Con
2,532
51.10%
109
2.20%
75.81%
2,423
2,532
–
–
–
4,955
Welland
Lib
Lib
3,125
56.11%
681
12.23%
92.26%
3,125
2,444
–
–
–
5,569
Wellington East
Lib
Lib
1,476
36.85%
188
4.69%
75.97%
1,476
1,241
–
–
1,288
4,005
Wellington South
Lib
Lib
2,341
49.88%
396
8.44%
90.53%
2,341
1,945
–
–
407
4,693
Wellington West
C-PP
Con
1,912
53.18%
229
6.37%
76.73%
1,683
1,912
–
–
–
3,595
Wentworth North
Lib
Con
1,700
55.43%
333
10.86%
79.58%
1,367
1,700
–
–
–
3,067
Wentworth South
Lib
Lib
1,649
52.78%
174
5.57%
83.62%
1,649
1,475
–
–
–
3,124
York East
Lib
Lib
2,091
55.63%
423
11.25%
69.47%
2,091
1,668
–
–
–
3,759
York North
Lib
Lib
2,543
55.08%
469
10.16%
80.61%
2,543
2,074
–
–
–
4,617
York West
Con
Lib
2,465
50.36%
35
0.72%
83.12%
2,465
2,430
–
–
–
4,895
^ excluding Ottawa, a multi-member constituency
^ order is as given in EO reports
= open seat
= turnout is above provincial average
= winning candidate was in previous Legislature
= incumbent had switched allegiance
= previously incumbent in another riding
= not incumbent; was previously elected to the Legislature
= incumbency arose from byelection gain
= incumbency arose from prior election result being overturned by the court
= other incumbents renominated
= previously an MP in the House of Commons of Canada
= multiple candidates
^ plurality for second winning candidate
Analysis
Party candidates in 2nd place[ 1] [ a 1]
Party in 1st place
Party in 2nd place
Total
Accl
Lib
Con
Ind
Liberal
2
42
6
50
Conservative
36
1
4
41
Independent Conservative
1
1
Total
2
37
43
10
92
Resulting composition of the 2nd Legislative Assembly of Ontario[ 1]
Source
Party
Lib
Con
I-Con
Total
Seats retained
Incumbents returned
22
10
32
Returned by acclamation
2
2
Open seats held
6
3
9
Seats changing hands
Incumbents defeated
10
15
25
Open seats gained
5
10
15
Byelection gains held
2
1
3
Incumbent changed allegiance
3
2
1
6
Ottawa seats
New MLAs
1
1
Total
51
42
1
94
MLAs elected by region and riding
Party designations are as follows:
Liberal
Conservative
Independent Conservative
Northern Ontario
Ottawa Valley
Saint Lawrence Valley
Central Ontario
Georgian Bay
Wentworth/Halton/Niagara
Midwestern Ontario
Southwestern Ontario
Peel/York/Ontario
Seats that changed hands
Elections to the 9th Parliament of Ontario – seats won/lost by party, 1894–1898
Party
1894
Gain from (loss to)
1898
Lib
Con
Ind-C
Lib-P
C-PPA
POI
Con-P
L-PPA
PPA
ICP
Liberal
45
10
(14)
6
2
1
1
51
Conservative
23
14
(10)
6
3
3
1
1
1
42
Independent-Conservative
–
1
1
Liberal -Patrons
12
(6)
(6)
–
Conservative –P.P.A.
5
(2)
(3)
–
Patrons of Industry
3
(3)
–
Conservative -Patrons
2
(1)
(1)
–
Liberal -P.P.A.
2
(1)
(1)
–
Protestant Protective Association
1
(1)
–
Independent-Conservative-PPA
1
(1)
–
Total
94
14
(20)
10
(29)
–
(1)
12
–
5
–
3
–
2
–
2
–
1
–
1
–
94
There were 50 seats that changed allegiance in the election:
Conservative to Liberal
Liberal/Patrons of Industry to Liberal
Conservative/PPA to Liberal
Liberal/PPA to Liberal
Independent-Conservative/PPA to Liberal
Liberal to Conservative
Liberal/Patrons of Industry to Conservative
Conservative/PPA to Conservative
Patrons of Industry to Conservative
Conservative/Patrons of Industry to Conservative
Liberal/PPA to Conservative
PPA to Conservative
Conservative/Patrons of Industry to Independent-Conservative
MLAs changing parties
Six members changed their principal affiliation from the previous election:
See also
Notes and references
Notes
^ Election declared void because of corrupt practices. Writ for new election issued. Loughrin was reelected in the subsequent byelection.[ 2]
^ Tendered resignation in exchange for withdrawing election petition. Writ for new election issued. Allen was reelected in the subsequent byelection.[ 2]
^ Election declared void because of corrupt practices. Writ for new election issued. Aylsworth was reelected in the subsequent byelection.[ 2]
^ Election declared void because of corrupt practices. Writ for new election issued. Douglas was reelected in the subsequent byelection.[ 2]
^ Election declared void because of corrupt practices. Writ for new election issued. Barber was reelected in the subsequent byelection.[ 2]
^ Tendered resignation in exchange for withdrawing election petition. Writ for new election issued. Garrow was reelected in the subsequent byelection.[ 2]
^ Election declared void because of corrupt practices. Writ for new election issued. Samuel Nelson Monteith (Conservative) was elected in the subsequent byelection.[ 2]
^ Election declared void because of corrupt practices. Appeal was dismissed.[ 2] Writ for new election issued. Louis Jacob Breithaupt (Liberal) was elected in the subsequent byelection.[ 3]
^ Court ruling dismissing original election petion was overturned on appeal. Writ for election issued. Brower was reelected in the subsequent byelection.[ 3]
^ Election declared void because of corrupt practices. Writ for new election issued. Donald Macnish (Liberal) was elected in the subsequent byelection.[ 2] Byelection declared void, and MacDiarmid returned in a later byelection.[ 3]
^ Election declared void because of corrupt practices. Writ for new election issued. John Dryden (Liberal) was elected in the subsequent byelection.[ 2]
References