User talk:HelpingWorld/Archive 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Brevard, North Carolina

added a link pointing to Triple Falls

United States

added a link pointing to Chamorro

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of Roblox games, you may be blocked from editing. -- ferret (talk) 17:33, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Inexpiable. An edit that you recently made to List of serial killers in the United States seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Inexpiable (talk) 11:38, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Helpingworld, I hope you are well.

I am contacting you because you were a supporter of the Vmoto page, and so I was wondering if I could lean on you, for some assistance in a matter relating to this page, and another associated page, that of Super Soco?

First up, I should notify you of something that has likely escaped your attention.

In recent days, one Wiki editor has slapped a tag on the Super Soco page, stating that A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject. and This article may have been created or edited in return for undisclosed payments, a violation of Wikipedia's terms of use.

At a glance, these tags give the impression that they reflect some kind of consensus view. However, this is not at all the case. It is important to note that it is just one editor who is behind this push.

If you look at the Super Soco AFD page, you’ll see his arguments around COI are summarised in the first three lines.

Suspected WP: UPE - because creator is also connected with Revolt Motors and Vmoto - both distributors of Super Soco electric bikes in India and Australia respectively.

I attempted to explain to the editor in question that his argument behind the UPE and COI tags are mistaken, and that Revolt Motors is not the distributor of Super Soco bikes in India, they are an independent company and are a competitor to Vmoto.

To give an example of what I am referring to, see the link below. What this illustrates is that Vmoto are in fact in compemption with Revolt in India:

Vmoto is an Australian two-wheeler manufacturing group that largely makes electric scooters. The company recently signed an MoU with the Indian company Bird Group, and will discuss collaborating for the distribution of two of its products – Super Soco CUmini and Super Soco CUx.

Source: https://gaadiwaadi.com/super-soco-cumini-electric-scooter-india-launch-confirmed/

My attempts to explain this seem to have fallen on deaf ears, he responded by stating Let's hold the horses and wait for others' assessment. In other words, even this editor doesn't deny the UPE tag is questionable!

The argument of the editor around Revolt is based on a source that referring to a supply chain link between Super Soco. However, these links are common in the automotive industry, and especially in a small, emerging industry as is the case with the e-motorcycle space.

There is no question that Revolt Motors and Vmoto Soco are independent companies (in fact, the same is true of Vmoto and Super Soco, although these do have a partnership relationship, albeit one which seems to be breaking down).

Essentially, the UPE and the COI tags on the page are based on the claim that Revolt is the Super Soco distributor in India, which is certainly not the case. In fact, Revolt is not even the same brand as Super Soco.

The reason I feel compelled to mention this to you, is because if the Super Soco article is pulled down based on the dodgy UPE claim, the editor who is pushing for the removal of Super Soco (and it is largely being driven by the one fellow) will then go on to delete the Vmoto page, using the removal of the Super Soco page as justification.

What concerns me about this is that the UPE tag on a Wikipedia page is like the kiss of death. Most visitors to the page will not realise that there is just one editor behind this, and some will surely nominate the article for delete, based on this mistaken view that there is a well-founded consensus.

At the moment, the editor is targeting the Super Soco page, because he knows it is much quieter that the Vmoto page (note that the UPE tag has not been pasted on the Vmoto page, despite the comments of the editor on the Super Soco page: I believe this is tactical, it looks to me as if the editor is aiming to quietly remove the Super Soco page, before anyone notices).

What I am requesting, is would you be able to offer some support in this?

If you could post a 'Keep' request on the Super Soco page that would be a help for sure. However, what would be even more helpful is if you could challenge the dubious UPE claim, posted at the top of the Super Soco page. Basically, if you could employ your research skills to track down any sources that show Revolt Motors and Vmoto are independent and distinct companies, and post it on the Super Soco or Revolt page, that would be fantastic.

Essentially, if the aim is to keep the Vmoto and Super Soco page, we need to show that Revolt Motors and Vmoto are distinct companies, to invalidate the assertion by this editor that there is a conflict of interest here (by the way, I have never accepted a payment for an article on Wikipedia, nor will I ever, although that almost goes without saying).

What makes this a bit challenging is that is that there is a lot of mis-information about Vmoto, Super Soco and Revolt, many writers don't understand the relationship between them, and it is possible to 'cherry pick' poor quality sources to mount an argument that there is a relationship between Revolt and Super Soco/Vmoto. So I need some assistance with this, I'm not going to be able to do it on my own.

Thanks for reading Helping World, I know you are probably busy, but any help with this would be greatly appreciated. Inchiquin (talk) 17:04, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Please review this guideline. Please do not link well-known placenames, such as major cities like London. -- Ssilvers (talk) 17:22, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chillicothe Correctional Institution, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Sapp.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Inexpiable was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Article is not only poorly sourced but no where near close to being finished.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Miao Liu Incident and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Miao Liu Incident, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Inexpiable (talk) 22:30, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, HelpingWorld! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Inexpiable (talk) 22:30, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You tagged three place articles as WP:A1. You failed to notify the author of the articles. Instead, you posted notices on the article Talk page. All of your tags were declined because they were wrong. I also deleted the article Talk pages that you inappropriately created. Do not tag any more articles for deletion. You clearly do not understand how it works and your tags are disruptive.--Bbb23 (talk) 02:03, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I understand but can I request for those articles to become drafts so they can get improvement? HelpingWorld (talk) 02:13, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, HelpingWorld,

If you want to improve the articles, feel free to improve them. They are stub articles, there are thousands of them on Wikipedia. Please review Wikipedia:Stub so you understand how a one sentence entry can be considered an article.

If you have questions about article creation or Wikipedia's deletion policies, please bring them to the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:44, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi HelpingWorld! I like your signature, but noticed it does not meet Wikipedia's standards for accessibility. Specifically, the visual contrast ratio is too low. Your signature of cyan (#00FFFF) on white (#FFFFFF) comes in at 1.25:1, and the minimum requirement is 4.5:1 (see WP:SIGAPP). Please change the color of your signature to meet the visual contrast ratio requirement. ––FormalDude talk 06:06, 4 April 2022 (UTC) Hey FormalDude I think I fixed it but I am new to this signature thing. `~HelpingWorld~` ^(👽🛸) 05:00, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Great, thank you! ––FormalDude talk 18:58, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi HelpingWorld -- I just wanted to flag to your attention this portion of the manual of style: MOS:TVNOW. The relevant part of the manual states, References to the show, and its characters and locations, should always be in the present tense, as the show will still exist even after it is no longer airing new episodes (e.g. "The Dick Van Dyke Show is a show that aired from 1961 to 1966."). I know it may seem a bit counter-intuitive at first, but this is generally the rule used in TV show articles (e.g., I Love Lucy uses "is" even though the show has been out of production since 1957). Thank you. Aoi (青い) (talk) 01:41, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This applies to most creative works, they still continue to exist after they are complete - see Epic of Gilgamesh for example. A series of television episodes is no different. Geraldo Perez (talk) 01:50, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your Teahouse help! Nobody else responded for a day, but you did and it gave me such relief! PoliticallyPassionateGamer (talk) 20:48, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I see you have taken to answering questions at the Teahouse. Unfortunately, some of those answers are incorrect, such as this one (one is allowed to revert warning on one’s own talk page with very few exceptions, and reverting edits blindly is bad but usually not vandalism).

I would suggest that in future replies, you try to give a wikilink to the policy that applies. This way, you can check what it says for sure before posting your reply. It is fairly important to get it right, because even if you end up reverting an incorrect answer, there is a chance that someone will have read and remembered the previous incorrect answer. Tigraan^{Click here for my talk page ("private" contact)} 16:27, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Tigraan. Be sure that your answer is correct before you post it. Cullen328 (talk) 16:57, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi HelpingWorld! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Deleting a Draft I created, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

National Military Appreciation Month, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:04, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I just wanted to mention that if you are still planning on creating an article about the Halderson murders, it might be good to read this essay which suggests centering the event (i.e. by titling the article "Murders of Bart and Krista Halderson") rather than the murderer. Also, do note that this event would need to meet notability guidelines as mentioned in that essay. Happy writing! Patr2016 (talk) 03:53, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the help! I have never created a crime article before so this is really appreciated and I am going to start working on it again. Thanks again.`~HelpingWorld~` ^(👽🛸) 04:34, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, HelpingWorld,

It's absolutely fine if you want to rescue an expiring draft from CSD G13 deletion. Just be sure to follow through and do some work on these drafts or they will just come up for deletion again, six months from now. There's no point in postponing deletion if you don't intend to spend time getting a draft in good enough shape to submit to WP:AFC. Typically, the draft creators are long gone so there is only you to improve the article. Thanks for all of your contributions to the platform! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:49, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]