Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Robotics

This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Robotics and anything related to its purposes and tasks.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Shortcuts WT:ROBOWT:ROBO WT:ROBOTICSWT:ROBOTICS

Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 12 months

	This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Robotics This page is within the scope of WikiProject Robotics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Robotics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RoboticsWikipedia:WikiProject RoboticsTemplate:WikiProject RoboticsRobotics

WikiProject Robotics was featured in a WikiProject Report in the Signpost on 24 September 2012.

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 January 2008 - December 2008 Deletion discussion

This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be auto-archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Robert C. Michelson has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 18:20, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I'm wondering if any editors at this WikiProject would be interested in reviewing my AfC draft for Serve Robotics. I was very careful to write in a neutral, encyclopedic style and only cite high-quality sources (e.g., TechCrunch, VentureBeat, Bloomberg, The Verge, and Quartz). The draft was immediately declined and I would appreciate a thoughtful assessment from editors familiar with the subject area (namely, robotics and technology), so that I'm updating the draft in the right way before trying again, as I don't want to keep hitting a brick wall and wasting editors' time.

To me, the "written like an advertisement" tag feels unwarranted and is something I really really tried to avoid... but maybe there's something I'm missing. I'd welcome feedback from others. I know I'm coming from a biased perspective as the comms head at Serve so I would appreciate help in creating a neutral article that's a contribution to the Wikipedia community. Thank you! ServeAduke (talk) 21:34, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Meta Platforms#Requested move 29 October 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. 𝚈𝚘𝚟𝚝 (𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔𝚟𝚝) 21:23, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is an RFC at Talk:15.ai#RFC_on_Status_of_Web_Site on the status of the web site. Participation is invited. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:39, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there!

I've suggested significant changes to the Optical Flow article. See Talk:Optical flow for further details. The changes suggested are in my User:Moderately Sized Greg/sandbox. I'm fairly new, so any feedback would be greatly appreciated! Moderately Sized Greg (talk) 06:43, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I am the son of Alexander M. Meystel, who was a researcher and professor known for his work in intelligent control systems, robotics, and machine intelligence. I have recently created a draft Wikipedia article to honor his scientific contributions, including numerous IEEE publications, patents, and leadership roles.

Given his important role in the development of multiresolutional control theory and autonomous robotics, I would appreciate if members of WikiProject Robotics, Control Theory, or Electrical Engineering could kindly review the draft.

My goal is to ensure the article meets Wikipedia’s notability and sourcing standards, maintains a neutral tone, and accurately reflects his impact in the field.

The draft can be found here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Alexander_Meystel

Thank you very much for your time and expertise!

Best regards, Michael Meystel Meystel (talk) 19:41, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Please note that Remote sensing, which is within this project's scope, has been selected as one of the Articles for improvement. The article is scheduled to appear on Wikipedia's Community portal in the "Articles for improvement" section for one week, beginning today. Everyone is encouraged to collaborate to improve the article. Thanks, and happy editing! Delivered by — MusikBot talk 00:05, 2 June 2025 (UTC) on behalf of the AFI team[reply]

Nikola Tesla has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 21:38, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Megasaurus has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Tagged as Unreferenced for 12+ years. No other language has a reliably sourced article from which to translate. No assertion nor evidence of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bearian (talk) 15:40, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]