User talk:Useight/Archive8

If only! LOL... (it was posed and the tram wasn't even connected to the electric at the time!)

I better make sure the picture of me driving a DMU doesn't surface!

Take care,

BG7 01:30, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks! It'll be tommorrow now, as i'm off to bed!

BG7 01:35, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

+1 for huggle, that's what I'm on now, cheers, Razorflame Report false positives 02:01, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My reply here

Could you please comment on how to program an archival bot for Wikipedia:Editor review that is both feasible and advisable? My inclination is to keep the current system, i.e. alphabetical order, with the date of the first edit to the page noted. I am willing to sacrifice either of these points if it makes the bot operator's job easier. In other words, we could forget about alphabetical order and archive by month, or we could simply not bother to note the date of each individual request. I am posting this message to several users active at Editor Review to solicit opinions. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 03:53, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The metadata for every image (right down the very bottom of the image page) shows details of the camera used to take the photo. Bluegoblin's images all show they were taken with an Olympus UD600, while Shanner's were taken with a Minolta Dimage. Not proof of anything - and it is possible (albeit difficult) to fake metadata - but certainly points against sockpuppetry. — iridescent 15:33, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Above comment struck through as he's now owned up to abusive sockpuppetry & votestacking. So much for WP:AGF... — iridescent 15:37, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My reply here

Further reply here (seemed easier to keep the conversation together, as someone else might follow the links and join in). — iridescent 16:09, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Useight; I wanted to say thank you for supporting my request for adminship, which passed with 100 supports, 0 opposes and 1 neutral. I wanted to get round everybody individually, even though it's considered by some to be spam (which... I suppose it is! but anyway. :)). It means a lot to me that the community has placed its trust in my ability to use the extra buttons, and I only hope I can live up to its expectations. If you need anything, or notice something that bothers you, don't hesitate to let me know. Thanks again, PeterSymonds | talk 22:08, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, you look tired. You should take a break and drink some milk. Leeboyge (talk) 03:54, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I added myself to the category at 23:50 but you created my status page 6 minutes earlier at 23:44. so are you psychic, or what? xenocidic ( talk ¿ review ) 03:58, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My reply here

Lol, I'm still confused as to how you knew I wanted in statusbot... did I have something laying around referencing it? xenocidic ( talk ¿ review ) 04:02, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I figured it out. You're the guy with the HAU list ;> xenocidic ( talk ¿ review ) 04:07, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My reply here

Yep, crazy coincidence. I just happened to notice someone who made a slight change to User:StatusBot and figured the new bot would work and such... anyways... *queue x-files music*... best, xenocidic ( talk ¿ review ) 04:11, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why does it give me a redlink to a StatusBot sub page? Shouldn't that be a date? Basketball110 ^{My story}/_{Tell me yours} 04:14, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My reply here

Why did you add the cat in this diff? I don't use statusbot. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 04:35, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My reply here

Thanks for adding the cat. I suppose I'm very active late at night well. I should have added that originally. Can you change my online time until 2 a.m. EST? I tried to do it myself, but the edit preview showed the chart all screwed up. Thanks. APK ^{yada yada} 04:44, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My reply here

How does the HAU work with StatusBot? I experimented with the template, but I didn't like it since it never seemed to work, so I removed it. bibliomaniac15 04:54, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My reply here

While I appreciate your enthusiasm, I would prefer that you not edit my user page. If you think something should be added to it, please post on my talk page and I'll consider it. Thanks! ···日本穣^{? · Talk to Nihonjoe} 05:38, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My reply here

May I ask why you decided to add this to my user page? I don't use StatusBot. --Fabrictramp (talk) 13:55, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Check the Important note at the top of this page. xenocidic ( talk ¿ review ) 13:56, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My reply here

A good edit summary would have avoided all of this.--Fabrictramp (talk) 15:18, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My reply here

I tried to be bold and restore a userbox to its rightful place that seemed to have been moved out by tomfoolery and not moved back properly, anyways, I was hoping you might be able to help me out as the CSD tag I placed to facilitate the move hasn't been speedied yet... so without much further ado:

• delete User:Nehrams2020/Userboxes/Blues_Brothers
• move User:WrestlingManiac/Userboxes/Blues_Brothers to User:Nehrams2020/Userboxes/Blues_Brothers (i think this can be done in one fell swoop?)

thanks! cheers. xenocidic ( talk ¿ review ) 14:59, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My reply here

Thanks for the quick resolution! xenocidic ( talk ¿ review ) 15:04, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I tagged the former for speedy, since no one was trancluding it anyway. Looks like wrestling fan was just goofing around for whatever reason. P.S. I didn't notice that Nehram2020 was an admin before I started all this boldness, otherwise I would've just suggested he do it. anyhow, alls well that ends well. Thanks again. xenocidic ( talk ¿ review ) 15:07, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, my girlfriend said it was better, and I'm nuts for my new chickens anyway. :) VanTucky ^{Vote in my weird poll!} 18:52, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I requested that bibilomanaic become my admin coach but he believed that at this point in time I was a little to inexperienced which I think was a fair assessment so in the mean time I wanted to get a little more information from yourself. You referred me to a page about admin criteria and I had a few questions. What is the difference between mainspace and namespace edits and also you mention about "High activity in areas in which candidate mentions in Q1", what are these areas? Thanks a lot!Londonfella (talk) 12:37, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My reply here

Thanks for taking on this project; you've put a lot of work into it and it's looking good. Cheers, Antandrus (talk) 03:58, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My reply here

Can you add me to the EST timezone? Also, what's with the 'status' column — are people required to update that every time they log on? Gary King (talk) 04:01, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My reply here

Ah, that's creepy. Very creepy indeed. Almost Big Brother-esque... Gary King (talk) 04:05, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My reply here

I think the available times should be added back in. bibliomaniac15 04:13, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My reply here

Why does my status say offline? Also, I assume the sections that are checkmarked are generally for admins only? I do some recent change patrolling and AIV reports, but usually stick to creating/expanding articles and watch ANI when tv dramas get boring. APK ^{yada yada} 04:18, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My reply here

Yeah, it's still not working. bibliomaniac15 04:20, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My reply here

I'm always logged in, so it might be the status bot. APK ^{yada yada} 04:28, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I added myself, I hope that's alright. Also APK, the bot checks your contributions and not if you have the 'always logged in' thing checked. Gary King (talk) 04:30, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My reply here

Not sure what each of the sections refers to, adminship? Does this mean...user is a admin coach? What about noticeboards...I mean I help out at AN and ANI, is that enough? Maybe making each title more clear. Cheers, Tiptoety ^talk 05:06, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My reply here

Maybe we should make a key (legend) at the bottom explaining what each heading means... Tiptoety ^talk 05:09, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My reply here

Great! Let me know if there is any way for me to help (though I am off to bed) :D Oh, and by the way, thanks for all your great work! Cheers, Tiptoety ^talk 05:14, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How do I fix statusbot? It says I'm offline when I'm clearly online. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 04:33, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My reply here

Good man, good man. Thanks for fixing that darn StatusBot, I hope. bibliomaniac15 04:51, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My reply here

By the way, I've added redirects to the subpages themselves. That should also help organization. Redirects are cheap after all. bibliomaniac15 05:11, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My reply here

• I don't particularly think that 15 minutes is a good time window, thus i've created my own little way of statusing myself (still uses statusbot). You can see it here: User talk:Xenocidic/infobox/status.

{{ #switch: {{User:StatusBot/Status/Xenocidic}}
 | online=online
 | offline={{ #ifexpr:  ({{#time:U}}-{{#time:U|{{User:StatusBot/Status/Xenocidic/LastEdit}}}}) > 7200 | offline | 
           {{ #ifexpr:  ({{#time:U}}-{{#time:U|{{User:StatusBot/Status/Xenocidic/LastEdit}}}}) > 1800 | recent  | online }}
           }}
}}

• Replaced with {{Truestatus}} -

It returns "online" if statusbot says so, or my last edit was within 30 minutes (1800 seconds), it returns "recent" if last edit was within 2 hours (7200 seconds), and "offline" otherwise. I've also modified Wikipedia:Highly_Active_Users/Status to accept the "recent" paramater (hope that's ok), though I couldn't find an appropriate matching symbol. (Is there an orange vote?) xenocidic ( talk ¿ review ) 13:18, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My reply here

Sorry, I didn't mean to confuse things. This is only for people who aren't happy with StatusBot's reporting windows, and they should make the changes themselves if they wish (doesn't need to be done HAU-wide). That being said, I've made it a lot simpler by creating {{Truestatus}}. The template documentation should explain it. Now people won't have to create their own status pages as you intimated. xenocidic ( talk ¿ review ) 15:39, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm willing to re-sign up, but I'm curious: what do the various columns mean? Do they mean "I'm willing/able to work with this kind of material"? Nyttend (talk) 11:14, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My reply here

I added a few checks, but thanks for the update! Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 17:11, 16 May 2008 (UTC) Me too, thanks for the update. Spencer^T♦C 20:27, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I read your comment like 5 times and still don't get what you mean by "copy to my user page." I know I'm going feel stupid, but could you explain that more :) « Gonzo fan2007 (talk ♦ contribs) @ 23:16, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My reply here

I've gone ahead and reformed the table in WP:HAU/OC. I don't know how the StatusBot thing is supposed to work, so I've left that blank. bibliomaniac15 01:49, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My reply here

Should I also add back those only in the details section that weren't on the previous main table? bibliomaniac15 01:54, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My reply here

BTW, with regards to the key, shouldn't Wikignomes and those Wikibeasts go on "Maintenance" and FA, GA, and DYK go on "Content"? bibliomaniac15 02:07, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My reply here

WP:HAU/OC is completely finished now. Please check to see if I did the StatusBot stuff right. bibliomaniac15 02:28, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My reply here

Haha, well that makes a lot more sense now. I will do that, thanks for the help! « Gonzo fan2007 (talk ♦ contribs) @ 04:05, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there,

I see that you manually add each comment to each user's page. May I suggest that you use WP:AWB instead? It will save you a lot of time and hassle! :D

The Helpful One ^(Review) 17:27, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My reply here

I have created {{Wikipedia:Highly Active Users/table key}}. It could probably do with a little improvement. The column headings should also be templatised. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 18:14, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My reply here

		RfA: Many thanks
		Many thanks for your participation in my recent request for adminship. I am impressed by the amount of thought that goes into people's contribution to the RfA process, and humbled that so many have chosen to trust me with this new responsibility. I step into this new role cautiously, but will do my very best to live up to your kind words and expectations, and to further the project of the encyclopedia. Again, thank you. --jbmurray (talk • contribs) 05:38, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Status? I'd like to help, but I don't know how to signal that I'm online and off-line; do I need to edit WP:HAU every time? -Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:09, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My reply here

Brilliant Thanks. -Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:29, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow "Class of December 2006", hahaha. I'll keep contributing and be back in a few months with more contributions under my belt and hopefully my RfA will be successful. Thanks for your time, and have a wonderful day! -- _{TIM KLOSKE|TALK} 03:20, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Are we just allowing anyone to add themselves to the list? I removed a user who has clearly lost the community's trust, and Bob the Wikipedian flipped out, screaming in the edit summary that it was vandalism. Enigma ^message 21:06, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My reply here

I agree we need to nail down some requirements. Users who demonstratively do not have the trust of the community should not be there, IMO. Obviously only active users should be there. Those are two simple ones. RyRy does not have the trust of the community right now. I could elaborate on this, but I'd prefer not to. Enigma ^message 22:28, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My reply here

I do not have email and do not want to give the false assumption that I do. Why does Wikipedia:Highly Active Users/North America still have a little email button for me? Spencer^T♦C 01:23, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My reply here

It looks like the new check method Cobi put together doesn't have an option to opt-out of email. I'll drop him a line since I couldn't figure out how to make one at quick glance. xenocidic ( talk ¿ review ) 01:33, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My reply here

(e/c) Okay, thanks. Spencer^T♦C 01:37, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I asked Cobi here. xenocidic ( talk ¿ review ) 01:37, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My reply here

(Copied from my talk page) Yes ... Well actually, I just added it to the template. Add |email=N to the end of the parameters. Thanks. -- Cobi^(t|c|b) 01:42, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

← Nice work - thanks! xenocidic ( talk ¿ review ) 01:43, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I dont know why but whenever I am offline @ User:StatusBot/Status/Tinucherian , my status on Wikipedia:Highly Active Users/Asia is shown as Unknown , instead of offline. Any idea ??-- TinuCherian ^{(Wanna Talk?)} - 04:17, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My reply here

I've been trying to think of other possible co-coaches and I am starting to come up a bit short. Do you have any suggestions as to who you might like to have as a co-coach? Cheers, Razorflame 16:10, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've approached User:Keeper76 to be my co-coach. Are you alright with that? Cheers, Razorflame 16:15, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My reply here

By the way, I've left you a question on the admin coaching page. Cheers, Razorflame 16:31, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My reply here

A lot of people have told me that I need to create more articles in order to have a successful RfA, so I have decided to start my article creation drive. I am going to make 1 article a day until the 2 weeks before my RfA, when I will create 3 or 4 a day. Cheers, Razorflame 16:11, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I would just like to say thanks for the neutral vote in my recent RFA. I will still say thanks as from your comments and the other users comments that opposed me and gave me a neutral vote have made me make a todo list for before my next RFA. I hope I will have resolved all of the issues before then and I hope that you would be able to support me in the future. If you would like to reply to this message or have any more suggestions for me then please message me on my talk page as I will not be checking back here. Thanks again. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 16:32, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Are you online? I have a question to ask you.--RyRy5 (talk ♠ copy-edit) 06:16, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My reply here

Well, my original adopter is offline. Do you mind going through my contributions, reviewing them? I would just like your opinions on them--RyRy5 (talk ♠ copy-edit) 06:22, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My reply here

Sure. I guess just a summary today and more detailed tomorrow. I'll be going to bed later also. It's 11:30 pm here in Nevada.--RyRy5 (talk ♠ copy-edit) 06:28, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My reply here

Replied.--RyRy5 (talk ♠ copy-edit) 07:06, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My reply here

Alright. See you tomorrow. Oh, you should look through my archives for more clarification tomorrow. Regards, --RyRy5 (talk ♠ copy-edit) 07:10, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I found another one... --RyRy5 (talk ♠ copy-edit) 07:17, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Useight, I would like for you to be my adopter. I'v been looking for an admin adopter and I think I found one who is available. I was looking over your coaching pages and i think your just the right person. My current adopter, User:Steve Crossin, would like to have a word with you about it.--RyRy5 (talk ♠ copy-edit) 07:42, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My reply here

Useight, RyRy5 got into trouble a little while ago for submitting a DYK article (that made it onto the front page) that consisted completely of WP:COPYVIO material. Did you hear about that? If you didn't, I just thought I'd bring it to your attention. Take care. Scarian^{Call me Pat!} 09:48, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My reply here

Useight, don't know if you're watching Scarian's page, I replied to both of you there. Reply here or there or wherever if you want. _{TravellingCari}^{the Busy Bee} 01:09, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I realize in the past that we have not exactly seen eye-to-eye at WP:RFA. I realize that one of the things you would like to see more of from me is article work. What do you think I should do or start doing before my next RFA? Thanks. -- Cobi^(t|c|b) 06:33, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My reply here

I am somewhat interested in this section of Wikipedia and would like to learn more about it. Where are the relevant pages that I might be able to browse over so that I can start nominating articles for DYK. Can you also point me to all the relevant pages for GA's please? Thanks, Razorflame 15:49, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My reply here

Could you perhaps help me with this user's request? I know you're not in the cat but... xenocidic ( talk ¿ review ) 20:29, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My reply here

Cheers - thanks. xenocidic ( talk ¿ review ) 20:36, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My reply here

Category:Wikipedia administrators who will provide copies of deleted articles =) xenocidic ( talk ¿ review ) 20:40, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My reply here

Cool. To be honest I usually cut and paste anything of substance to the user talk after I CSD it, I just didn't in this case for some reason... Thanks again. xenocidic ( talk ¿ review ) 20:54, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I happened to notice your post at RfA talk re your upcoming graduation. I will be celebrating the 20th aniversary of my BS in Business in December; the time has just flown by. Good luck to you! --Kevin Murray (talk) 20:36, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My reply here

I started college at 17, got my bachelors at 31, and my MBA at 36. Everything worked out well in the end, and my work experiences during my 20s were a great education. After 2 years in public accounting and 2 years as a controller for a small manufacturing firm, I got my MBA, then went entreprenurial, in real estate trading and rentals, along with becoming a broker for sales and financing. Good luck with your entreprenurship, but always keep a lot of cash on hand for the hard times. --Kevin Murray (talk) 17:52, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I've got a little question about vandalism. How many warnings is enough to block a user. I ran across User:Lfatboy, and it seems that 80% of his edits are non-constructive, and blantantly vandalism. I gave him Uw-vandalism1, 2, and 3 templates, but I was curious if it was typical/necessary to give five warnings before blocking a user. In this case, almost all of his edits were vandalism, so would 3 warnings be enough, and then the fourth time block him? Or is it always 5 warnings, then block? -- _{TIM KLOSKE|TALK} 21:53, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My reply here

Thanks! I'll keep that in mind. Cheers! -- _{TIM KLOSKE|TALK} 23:07, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[1] I never could spell. Thanks for fixing that. :-) --Koji†Dude ^(C) 22:10, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I've been thinking, and I don't think I want rollback again, well, at least until many others think I am ready to try again and when I have been here for a few more months. --RyRy5 (talk ♠ copy-edit) 23:43, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just in case you didn't know, you can send me a message on my talk page, or an email, about this. Having two adopters, I think, could be a bit of an issue. While it could be a good idea, I'm still not overly sure. Steve Crossin (talk) (review) 01:03, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Steve seems to be offline so I have a request: It seems the above article's history section is a copyvio of the home website. The evidence is around this website. I can't search thoroughy at the moment. You should probably check Google also. What should I/you do about it since it is a copyvio? --RyRy5 (talk ♠ copy-edit) 03:09, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My reply here

Replied. Also, are you watching my page? I think it would be a good idea to start if you haven't yet just incase you want to comment on something.--RyRy5 (talk ♠ copy-edit) 03:44, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My reply here

Heh, no wonder I couldn't find anything... you'd already removed it. Cheers, and good job Ry. · AndonicO ^Engage. 03:45, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks AndonicO for trying. I guess it was confusing for you at first. --RyRy5 (talk ♠ copy-edit) 03:49, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. Do you mind checking WP:AIV if my reports were right? Thanks.--RyRy5 (talk ♠ copy-edit) 03:58, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My reply here

(outdent):I actually reported two and both were blocked. And no, it's okay. Every time I make a report there, I always check back to see what happened. Many of my reports resulted in blocks. But I do have another favor to ask of you. I saw at the admin coaching subpage of razorflame what you did. It was something like, "1000 mainspace edits, 50 wikipedia talk edits, 500 project space edits, etc." Do you mind checking my count on kate's tool and doing the same? --RyRy5 (talk ♠ copy-edit) 04:08, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My reply here

Well, I know most of my user talk edits are vandalism warnings. Yeah, I know my count is high but with little edits in certain areas. I have a few questions. Should I stop reverting vandalism to warn users for a while and here is a good place to talk in wikipedia talk namespace? RyRy5 (talk ♠ copy-edit) 04:38, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My reply here

Replied.--RyRy5 (talk ♠ copy-edit) 05:12, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed on your talkpage that they wanted to remove my name from WP:HAU. I then saw the thread at the HAU talk page about requirements. Do I reach the the requirements. If so, do you mind clarifying at the talk page that I can be a part of HAU?--RyRy5 (talk ♠ copy-edit) 05:17, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My reply here

All right! I will go take a look now! Cheers, Razorflame 14:50, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've responded to your what-if questions. Cheers, Razorflame 15:05, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See above note. Cheers, Razorflame 19:29, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

From the looks of WP:HAU, your online and Steve's not. I was wondering how you think of me contributing to to help desk. --RyRy5 (talk ♠ copy-edit) 00:56, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My reply here

Thanks for telling me. And that edit summary, I think that was an accident. I probably wasn't paying much attention. I will be more careful in the future. Regards, --RyRy5 (talk ♠ copy-edit) 01:42, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Inspecting your user page i see you have 2 userboxes that indicate that you are an admin, im not sure if you realise but i thought i would let you know. --Realist² (Come Speak To Me) 03:57, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, i left a message at wisdoms talk page. --Realist² (Come Speak To Me) 04:07, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I can see where Realist is coming from. He's afraid that comments appearing accusatory will weigh heavily against the user in the future, perhaps even at his/her next RfA, painting them perpetually in a negative light. Although, the case itself is a stain on the record. To be fair, you'll notice my comments on said page mirror your thoughts almost exactly. It's about confession and avoiding nasty consequences. Everyone should assume good faith, yes, but sometimes there is a preponderance of evidence that shakes our ability to recite the policy with unwavering resolve. I feel that this is the case here. The fact is, a sockpuppetry case wouldn't have even been opened in the first place if WP:AGF prevailed all the time. It's not a get out of jail free card, you know? I don't think any of your comments were uncivil or libelous (the latter is a very nasty term). Although, I think perhaps you and I made the fundamental error of not letting the evidence speak for itself. Know what I mean? Wisdom89 _{(T / ^C)} 04:19, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My reply here

I replied on my talkpage. Realist² (Come Speak To Me) 05:38, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My reply here

I was going to ask if you wanted it removed or not. So, how is it so far? --RyRy5 (talk ♠ copy-edit) 04:44, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My reply here

LOL way to make me feel all self-concious about my "lavender" divboxes! (Fixed) xenocidic ( talk ¿ review ) 12:20, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My reply here

No problem. One suggestion if you're going to keep the black background is to span-style the links so that they're bold red (or whatever font colour you settle on) the dark blue is tough to read on the black background. xenocidic ( talk ¿ review ) 14:55, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My reply here

Here's an example of how to do it. I'm not gunna lie though - I'm not a fan of the black background, so your other idea would be best =) xenocidic ( talk ¿ review ) 15:02, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My reply here

definately better than the black, but now it makes the blue links hard to read (lol). make the links bold-black, or lighten the blue. xenocidic ( talk ¿ review ) 15:50, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm back dudes!!!! And yes school 7:30 to 2:30 PM. Has everything been resolved? Don't worry I'm fine. A good night's sleep helped. My mom even yelled at me for being on the computer for so long. But I now have a 3-day weekend due to memorial day. PS I live in oxnard, CA. Pacific time. Daylights saving time too. Offset from utc:-7 hours. I'll begin accepting apologies now.;)Xp54321 (Vandals Beware!!!,Contribs) 21:48, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My reply here

Yes, I see, I have nothing against you. And I have no reason to have anything against you. Thanks. This is a good lesson teacher. If my LA(English) teacher knew about this she'd make us write a 5 page essay! Thanks for AGF!!!! :DXp54321 (Vandals Beware!!!,Contribs) 22:07, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The case has been closed. I'm also requesting your opinion of me on my editor review. Link on top of userpage.:)Xp54321 (Vandals Beware!!!,Contribs) 22:49, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My reply here

Very well I agree with your response.Xp54321 (Vandals Beware!!!,Contribs) 22:58, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

First of all. How do you like your current userpage design? And yes, I know some things changed. Also, what is an autoblock and cool down block? Steve doesn't seem to be online again. We was though... --RyRy5 (talk ♠ copy-edit) 23:33, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My reply here

Thanks for the info. Oh, and why can't cool down blocks be used?--RyRy5 _{(talk ♠ copy-edit)} 01:58, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My reply here

I see. Thanks. I'll continue renovating your userpage in a little while. I'm currently busy with adminisrator actions at The Test Wiki. You can make an account there if you want. --RyRy5 (talk ♠ copy-edit) 02:09, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]