User talk:UC Bill/2009-01-21

Just wanted to give a belated thanks for your note on my talk page. Unfortunately I have this feeling the issue will likely head to arbitration since those pushing this seem to be ignoring the various calls to slow down/stop so it can be discussed properly (as opposed to the dozen or so editors who voted yes in a poll that didn't seem to be widely advertised). —Locke Cole • t • c 02:42, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've started a request at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration#Date delinking which you may wish to comment on. —Locke Cole • t • c 04:16, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You may wish to contact the clerk (Ryan Postlethwaite (talk · contribs)) for this case about having that sensitive information removed. Perhaps via oversight if you feel strongly about it (not sure if it'll help here or not, actually, but worth considering). —Locke Cole • t • c 21:19, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It bothers me, but it doesn't bother me enough to go through the trouble of having it removed from the history or anything. As long as my name doesn't appear in association with my wikipedia username anywhere on the current version of pages (i.e. the content that ends up getting mirrored all across the Internet) then I won't pursue it further. Thanks for all your effort on this issue, by the way. I (mostly) removed myself from the discussion a while back because I couldn't stomach the tactics that Tony and his gang were using, but I'm glad to see you stuck with it and may actually stand a good chance of arriving at a reasonable outcome. Good luck! --UC_Bill (talk) 21:24, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, and thanks for the support. —Locke Cole • t • c 22:11, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]