This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers, which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated.
This is a subpage of TheQ Editor's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.
So......you're a participant now. Right?--Dom497 (talk) 23:52, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-06-21T23:52:00.000Z","author":"Dom497","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Dom497-2015-06-21T23:52:00.000Z-GA_Cup","replies":["c-TheQ_Editor-2015-06-22T00:48:00.000Z-Dom497-2015-06-21T23:52:00.000Z"]}}-->
@Dom497: Yes, Christine emailed me and I told her I would not judge the 2015 Cup. I've taken a long break from Wikipedia and I would like to get used to it again. However, if you really need me to be a judge, I think I can do it. I just want to relax a bit this summer. ΤheQ Editor Talk?00:48, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-06-22T00:48:00.000Z","author":"TheQ Editor","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-TheQ_Editor-2015-06-22T00:48:00.000Z-Dom497-2015-06-21T23:52:00.000Z","replies":["c-Dom497-2015-06-22T01:38:00.000Z-TheQ_Editor-2015-06-22T00:48:00.000Z"],"displayName":"\u03a4heQ Editor"}}-->
Do whatever you want! I just wanted to make sure someone didn't hack you or something. ;). Enjoy the summer!--Dom497 (talk) 01:38, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-06-22T01:38:00.000Z","author":"Dom497","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Dom497-2015-06-22T01:38:00.000Z-TheQ_Editor-2015-06-22T00:48:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Dirtlawyer1-2015-06-26T19:15:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-GA_Review:_Tim_McKee-2015-06-26T19:15:00.000Z","replies":["c-Dirtlawyer1-2015-06-26T19:15:00.000Z-GA_Review:_Tim_McKee"],"text":"GA Review: Tim McKee","linkableTitle":"GA Review: Tim McKee"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Dirtlawyer1-2015-06-26T19:15:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-GA_Review:_Tim_McKee-2015-06-26T19:15:00.000Z","replies":["c-Dirtlawyer1-2015-06-26T19:15:00.000Z-GA_Review:_Tim_McKee"],"text":"GA Review: Tim McKee","linkableTitle":"GA Review: Tim McKee"}-->
Q Editor, thank you for jumping on the GA Review for the Tim McKee article and banging it out. I see that you are participating in the GA Cup contest. I have another five articles pending for GA Review, all American and Australian Olympic swimmers in similar condition to Tim McKee. If you're looking to complete several quick reviews for the Cup, they should be easy work for the reviewer. Cheers. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 19:15, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-06-26T19:15:00.000Z","author":"Dirtlawyer1","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Dirtlawyer1-2015-06-26T19:15:00.000Z-GA_Review:_Tim_McKee","replies":["c-TheQ_Editor-2015-06-27T18:15:00.000Z-Dirtlawyer1-2015-06-26T19:15:00.000Z"]}}-->
@Dirtlawyer1: That's fine with me. I'll start reviewing after I come back from vacation. Thanks, ΤheQ Editor Talk?18:15, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-06-27T18:15:00.000Z","author":"TheQ Editor","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-TheQ_Editor-2015-06-27T18:15:00.000Z-Dirtlawyer1-2015-06-26T19:15:00.000Z","replies":["c-Dirtlawyer1-2015-06-27T22:53:00.000Z-TheQ_Editor-2015-06-27T18:15:00.000Z"],"displayName":"\u03a4heQ Editor"}}-->
Good to know. I've had 5 GA nominations sitting since January/February. They're clean, well-sourced, and there is significant overlap of formatting and references. Reviewed one, you've reviewed all. Knowing you're interested in doing these Olympic swimmer reviews, I may have another couple ready by the time you return from vacation. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 22:53, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-06-27T22:53:00.000Z","author":"Dirtlawyer1","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-Dirtlawyer1-2015-06-27T22:53:00.000Z-TheQ_Editor-2015-06-27T18:15:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2015-06-28T13:00:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-2015_GA_Cup-2015-06-28T13:00:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2015-06-28T13:00:00.000Z-2015_GA_Cup"],"text":"2015 GA Cup","linkableTitle":"2015 GA Cup"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2015-06-28T13:00:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-2015_GA_Cup-2015-06-28T13:00:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2015-06-28T13:00:00.000Z-2015_GA_Cup"],"text":"2015 GA Cup","linkableTitle":"2015 GA Cup"}-->
Welcome to the GA Cup! In less than 72 hours, the competition will begin! Before you all start reviewing nominations and reassessments we want to make sure you understand the following:
This is a friendly competition so we don't want any cheating/breaking of the rules. However, if you do believe someone is going against the rules, notify the judges. All the rules are listed here.
If you are a new editor or new to reviewing Good article nominations, it is imperative that you read the 4 essays/guides listed under FAQ #4. If you do not understand something, ask a judge for clarification ASAP!
The competition is not entirely about who can review the most nominations. Per the "Scoring" page, there is different criteria in which you can earn more points. Theoretically, you could review 10 nominations and have 80 points but another user could have reviewed 5 nominations and have 100 points. Yes, we want you to review as many nominations as you can as this will greatly increase the number of points you earn, but you must also keep in mind that every single review will be looked over by a judge. If we find that you are "rubber-stamping" (in other words, the review is not complete but you still passed/failed the article) you may be disqualified without warning. The same applies with reassessments. If you just say that the article should be delisted or kept with no explanation, points will not be awarded.
Remember, to submit Good article reviews and reassessments on your submissions page (Some of you have not created your submissions page yet. Only reviews/reassessments submitted on your submissions page can earn points. If you participated in the 2014-2015 GA Cup, you still need to re-create your submissions page.). Detailed instructions on how to submit reviews and reassessments can be found under the "Submissions" page. Ask a judge if you need clarification.
Also, rather than creating a long list on what to remember, make sure you have read the "Scoring", "Submissions", and "FAQ" pages.
Now some of you are probably wondering how on earth the rounds will work.
The rounds will work in a similar fashion as the previous competition, with the exception of the first round. Round 1 will have everyone compete in one big pool. Depending on the final number of participants after sign-ups close, a to-be-determined number of participants will move on (highest scorers will move on) to Round 2. We guarantee that the top 15 will move on (this number may change), so make sure you aim for those top positions! Moving on to Round 2, participants will be split into pools. The pools will be determined by a computer program that places participants by random. More details regarding Round 2 will be sent out at the end of Round 1.
It is important to note that the GA Cup will run on UTC time, so make sure you know what time that is for where you live! On that note, the GA Cup will start on July 1 at 0:00:01 UTC; Round 1 will end on July 29 at 23:59:59 UTC; Round 2 will commence on August 1 at 0:00:01 UTC. All reviews must be started after or on the start time of the round. If you qualify for Round 2 but do not complete a review before the end of Round 1, the review can be carried over to Round 2; however that review will not count for Round 1. Prior to the start of the the second round, participants who qualify to move on will be notified.
Finally, if you know anyone else that might be interesting in participating, let them know! Sign-ups close on July 15 so there is still plenty of time to join in on the action!
If you have any further questions, contact one of the judges or leave a message here.
After sign-ups close, check the Pools page as we will post the exact number of participants that will move on to the next round. Because this number will be determined past the halfway mark of Round 1, we encourage you to aim to be in the top 15 as the top 15 at the end of the round are guaranteed to move on.
To subscribe or unsubscribe to future GA Cup newsletter, please add or remove your name to our mailing list. If you are a participant, you will be on the mailing list no matter what as this is the easiest way to communicate between all participants.
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2015-08-01T03:52:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-2015_GA_Cup_-_Round_2-2015-08-01T03:52:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2015-08-01T03:52:00.000Z-2015_GA_Cup_-_Round_2"],"text":"2015 GA Cup - Round 2","linkableTitle":"2015 GA Cup - Round 2"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2015-08-01T03:52:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-2015_GA_Cup_-_Round_2-2015-08-01T03:52:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2015-08-01T03:52:00.000Z-2015_GA_Cup_-_Round_2"],"text":"2015 GA Cup - Round 2","linkableTitle":"2015 GA Cup - Round 2"}-->
Wednesday saw the end of Round 1. The Rambling Man, who was eliminated during the first round in our last competition, earned an impressive 513 points, reviewed twice as many articles (26) as any other competitor. It was a tight race for second for first-time competitors BenLinus1214 and Tomandjerry211, who finished second and third with 243 and 224 points, respectively. Close behind was Wugapodes, who earned 205 points.
The change in our points system had an impact on scoring. It was easier to earn higher points, although the key to success didn't change from last time, which was choosing articles with older nomination dates. For example, most of the articles The Rambling Man reviewed were worth 18 points in the nomination date category, and he benefited from it. BenLinus1214 reviewed the longest article, A Simple Plan (at 26,536 characters, or 4,477 words), the 1994 film starring Bill Paxton, Billy Bob Thornton, and Bridget Fonda and directed by Sam Raimi, and earned all possible 5 points in that category.
After feedback from our participants, the judges slightly changed the rule about review length this time out. Shorter reviews are now allowed, as long as reviewers give nominators an opportunity to address their feedback. Shorter reviews are subject to the judges' discretion; the judges will continue their diligence as we continue the competition.
Despite having fewer contestants at the beginning of Round 1 than last time, 132 articles were reviewed, far more than the 117 articles that were reviewed in Round 1 of the inaugural GA Cup. All of us involved should be very proud of what we've accomplished thus far. The judges are certain that Round 2 will be just as successful.
16 contestants have moved onto Round 2 and have been randomly placed in 4 groups of 4, with the top 2 in each pool progressing to Round 3, as well as the top participant ("9th place") of all remaining competitors. Round 2 has already begun and will end on August 29 at 23:59:59 UTC. Information about Round 2 and the pools can be found here.
To subscribe or unsubscribe to future GA Cup newsletter, please add or remove your name to our mailing list. If you are a participant still competing, you will be on the mailing list no matter what as this is the easiest way to communicate between all participants.
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2015-08-15T14:44:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-GOCE_August_2015_newsletter-2015-08-15T14:44:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2015-08-15T14:44:00.000Z-GOCE_August_2015_newsletter"],"text":"GOCE August 2015 newsletter","linkableTitle":"GOCE August 2015 newsletter"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2015-08-15T14:44:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-GOCE_August_2015_newsletter-2015-08-15T14:44:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2015-08-15T14:44:00.000Z-GOCE_August_2015_newsletter"],"text":"GOCE August 2015 newsletter","linkableTitle":"GOCE August 2015 newsletter"}-->
July drive: Thanks to everyone who participated in last month's backlog-reduction drive. Of the 24 people who signed up, 17 copyedited at least one article. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here.
August blitz: The one-week April blitz, targeting biographical articles that have been tagged for copy editing for over a year, will run from August 16–22. Awards will be given to everyone who copyedits at least one article from the article list on the blitz page. Sign up here!
Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators, Jonesey95, Baffle gab1978, KieranTribe, Miniapolis, and Pax85.
To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
sent by Jonesey95 via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:44, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-08-15T14:44:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2015-08-15T14:44:00.000Z-GOCE_August_2015_newsletter","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Sturmvogel_66-2015-09-02T11:48:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiCup_2015_September_newsletter-2015-09-02T11:48:00.000Z","replies":["c-Sturmvogel_66-2015-09-02T11:48:00.000Z-WikiCup_2015_September_newsletter"],"text":"WikiCup 2015 September newsletter","linkableTitle":"WikiCup 2015 September newsletter"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Sturmvogel_66-2015-09-02T11:48:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiCup_2015_September_newsletter-2015-09-02T11:48:00.000Z","replies":["c-Sturmvogel_66-2015-09-02T11:48:00.000Z-WikiCup_2015_September_newsletter"],"text":"WikiCup 2015 September newsletter","linkableTitle":"WikiCup 2015 September newsletter"}-->
The finals for the 2015 Wikicup has now begun! Congrats to the 8 contestants who have survived to the finals, and well done and thanks to everyone who took part in rounds 3 and 4.
In round 3, we had a three-way tie for qualification among the wildcard contestants, so we had 34 competitors. The leader was by far Casliber (submissions) in Group B, who earned 1496 points. Although 913 of these points were bonus points, he submitted 15 articles in the DYK category. Second place overall was Coemgenus (submissions) at 864 points, who although submitted just 2 FAs for 400 points, earned double that amount for those articles in bonus points. Everyone who moved forward to Round 4 earned at least 100 points.
The scores required to move onto the semifinals were impressive; the lowest scorer to move onto the finals was 407, making this year's Wikicup as competitive as it's always been. Our finalists, ordered by round 4 score, are:
Cas Liber (submissions), who is competing in his sixth consecutive Wikicup final, again finished the round in first place, with an impressive 1666 points in Pool B. Casliber writes about the natural sciences, including ornithology, botany and astronomy. A large bulk of his points this round were bonus points.
Godot13 (submissions) (FP bonus points), second place both in Pool B and overall, earned the bulk of his points with FPs, mostly depicting currency.
Cwmhiraeth (submissions), first in Pool A, came in third. His specialty is natural science articles; in Round 4, he mostly submitted articles about insects and botany. Five out of the six of the GAs he submitted were level-4 vital articles.
West Virginian (submissions), from Pool A, was our highest-scoring wildcard. West Virginia tends to focus on articles about the history of (what for it!) the U.S. state of West Virginia.
Rationalobserver (submissions), from Pool B, came in seventh overall. RO earned the majority of her points from GARs and PRs, many of which were earned in the final hours of the round.
Calvin999 (submissions), also from Pool B, who was competing with RO for the final two spots in the final hours, takes the race for most GARs and PRs—48.
The intense competition between RO and Calvin999 will continue into the finals. They're both eligible for the Newcomers Trophy, given for the first time in the Wikicup; whoever makes the most points will win it.
Good luck to the finalists; the judges are sure that the competition will be fierce!
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2015-09-07T15:26:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiProject_Good_Articles's_2015_GA_Cup_-_Round_3-2015-09-07T15:26:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2015-09-07T15:26:00.000Z-WikiProject_Good_Articles's_2015_GA_Cup_-_Round_3"],"text":"WikiProject Good Articles's 2015 GA Cup - Round 3","linkableTitle":"WikiProject Good Articles's 2015 GA Cup - Round 3"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2015-09-07T15:26:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiProject_Good_Articles's_2015_GA_Cup_-_Round_3-2015-09-07T15:26:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2015-09-07T15:26:00.000Z-WikiProject_Good_Articles's_2015_GA_Cup_-_Round_3"],"text":"WikiProject Good Articles's 2015 GA Cup - Round 3","linkableTitle":"WikiProject Good Articles's 2015 GA Cup - Round 3"}-->
Greetings, all! We hope that everyone had a nice summer.
Saturday saw the end of Round 2. Things went relatively smoothly this month. The top 2 from 4 pools, plus the top participant (the wildcard, or "9th place") of all remaining competitors, moved onto Round 3. We had one withdrawal early in Round 2, so he was replaced by the next-highest scorer from Round 1. Round 2's highest scorer was Pool D's Tomandjerry211, who earned an impressive 366 points; he also reviewed the most articles (19). Close behind was Zwerg Nase, also in Pool D, at 297 points and 16 articles. The wildcard slot went to Good888. Congrats to all!
Round 3 will have 9 competitors in 3 pools. The key to moving forward was reviewing articles with the longest nomination dates, as it has been in every round up to now. For example, 2 competitors only needed to review 2 articles each to win in their pools, and each article were either from the pink nomination box (20 points) or had languished in the queue for over 5 months (18 points). The GA Cup continues to be a success in many ways, even with fewer competitors this time. For some reason, the competitors in the 2015 GA Cup have reviewed fewer articles in Round 2, which has made the judges scratch their head in confusion. We've speculated many reasons for that: the summer months and vacations, our competitors are saving their strength for the final rounds, or they all live in the Pacific Northwest and the heavy wildfire smoke has affected their thinking. Whatever the reason, Round 2 competitors reviewed almost 100 articles, which is a significant impact in the task of reviewing articles for GA status. We've considered that the lower participation this competition is due to timing, so we intend to discuss the best time frame for future GA Cups.
For Round 3, participants have been placed randomly in 3 pools of 3 contestants each; the top editor in each pool will progress, as well as the top 2 of all remaining users. Round 3 will start on September 1 at 0:00:01 UTC and end on September 28 at 23:59:59 UTC. Information about Round 3 and the pools can be found here.
Good luck to the remaining contestants, and have fun!
To subscribe or unsubscribe to future GA Cup newsletter, please add or remove your name to our mailing list. If you are a participant still competing, you will be on the mailing list no matter what as this is the easiest way to communicate between all participants.
Delivered on behalf of WikiProject Good articles by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:26, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-09-07T15:26:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2015-09-07T15:26:00.000Z-WikiProject_Good_Articles's_2015_GA_Cup_-_Round_3","replies":[]}}-->
Mind reviewing this for me at it's GAN? Thanks, Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 10:51, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-09-09T10:51:00.000Z","author":"Tomandjerry211 (alt)","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Tomandjerry211_(alt)-2015-09-09T10:51:00.000Z-Good_article_nominations","replies":[]}}-->
GA Cup competitors and observers: Happy Fall! Get ready, we're about to move into the finals of the second-ever GA Cup!
Monday saw the end of Round 3. Out of the 8 contestants in the semi-finals, 5 have moved to the finals. The semi-finals were competitive. Our semi-finalists reviewed a total of 61 articles, or a grand total of 1,151 points. If you were to lump the top winners from each of the three pools together, it'd be a close horse race; they were within 35 points of each other, which can only mean that the finals will be an exciting race. Tomandjerry211, our top scorer in Round 2, again earned the most points in the semi-finals, with 288 points and 16 articles reviewed. Johanna came in second overall, with 251 points and 13 articles reviewed; Sturmvogel 66 came in third overall, with 221 points and 16 articles. Rounding out our wildcard slots are Zwerg Nase and The Rambling Man. These contestants were very strategic in how they reviewed articles. Like every other round in the history of the GA Cup, success depended upon reviewing oldest-nominated articles. For example, Johanna reviewed 5 articles that were worth the highest possible points. Congrats to all our finalists, and good luck!
Stay tuned to this space for more information about the 2nd GA Cup, including overall statistics and how this competition has affected Wikipedia. We regret to inform you that Dom497, one of our original judges and co-creator of the GA Cup, has stepped down as a judge. Dom, a longtime member of WP:WikiProject Good articles, is responsible for the look of the GA Cup and has been instrumental in its upkeep. We wish him the best as he starts his university education, and are certain that he'll make an impact there as he has in Wikipedia.
The finals started on October 1 at 0:00:01 UTC and will end on Ocober 29 at 23:59:59 UTC with a winner being crowned. Information about the Final can be found here.
To subscribe or unsubscribe to future GA Cup newsletter, please add or remove your name to our mailing list. If you are a participant still competing, you will be on the mailing list no matter what as this is the easiest way to communicate between all participants.
September drive: Thanks to everyone who participated in last month's backlog-reduction drive. Of the 25 editors who signed up, 18 copyedited at least one article. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here.
October blitz: The one-week October blitz, targeting requests, has just concluded. Of the nine editors who signed up, seven copyedited at least one request; check your talk page for your barnstar!
The month-long November drive, focusing on our oldest backlog articles (June, July, and August 2014) and the October requests, is just around the corner. Hope to see you there!
The second-ever GA Cup is now over! The competition officially ended Thursday. Congrats to everyone who participated, and especially to our finalists.
The winner of the 2nd GA Cup is Zwerg Nase! He earned 408 points, over 100 points more than he earned in all previous rounds. He tied with our second-place winner, Sturmvogel 66 with 367 points, in number of articles reviewed (24), and they earned almost the same points for reviewing articles that were in the queue the longest (Zwerg with 322, Sturmvogel with 326). Basically, they tied in points, but what made the different for Zwerg was the advantage he had in reviewing longer articles. It seems that the rule change of earning more realistic points for longer articles made a difference. All of our contestants should be proud of the work they were able to accomplish through the GA Cup. Congrats to these worthy opponents!
Our third and fourth place winners, Johanna and Tomandjerry211, also ran a close race, with 167 points and 147 points respectfully. We had one withdrawal; we found it interesting that competitors dropped out in Round 2 and 3 as well. One of the original judges and co-creator of this competition, User:Dom497 stepped down as judge during Round 3; as stated previously, we will miss his input and wish him the best.
The judges were pleased with our results, even though fewer users competed this time compared to our inaugural competition. We recognize that this might be due to holding the competition during the summer months. We intend on looking more closely when we should conduct this contest, as well as other aspects of the GA Cup. We've set up a feedback page for everyone's input about how we should conduct the contest and what rule changes should be made. If you have any ideas about how we can improve things, please visit it and give us your input.
Again, thanks to all and congratulations to our winners! Please stay tuned for the start of GA Cup #3.
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MrWooHoo-2015-11-01T23:33:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-A_barnstar_for_you!-2015-11-01T23:33:00.000Z","replies":["c-MrWooHoo-2015-11-01T23:33:00.000Z-A_barnstar_for_you!"],"text":"A barnstar for you!","linkableTitle":"A barnstar for you!"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MrWooHoo-2015-11-01T23:33:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-A_barnstar_for_you!-2015-11-01T23:33:00.000Z","replies":["c-MrWooHoo-2015-11-01T23:33:00.000Z-A_barnstar_for_you!"],"text":"A barnstar for you!","linkableTitle":"A barnstar for you!"}-->
The Minor Barnstar
Although you did not make the top 16 of Round 1, you did participate and you still deserve a barnstar. Thank you so much for being a part of the 2nd Annual GA Cup and we hope to see you next year! MrWooHoo (talk) 23:33, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-11-01T23:33:00.000Z","author":"MrWooHoo","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MrWooHoo-2015-11-01T23:33:00.000Z-A_barnstar_for_you!","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Sturmvogel_66-2015-11-08T18:39:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiCup_2015:_The_results-2015-11-08T18:39:00.000Z","replies":["c-Sturmvogel_66-2015-11-08T18:39:00.000Z-WikiCup_2015:_The_results"],"text":"WikiCup 2015: The results","linkableTitle":"WikiCup 2015: The results"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Sturmvogel_66-2015-11-08T18:39:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiCup_2015:_The_results-2015-11-08T18:39:00.000Z","replies":["c-Sturmvogel_66-2015-11-08T18:39:00.000Z-WikiCup_2015:_The_results"],"text":"WikiCup 2015: The results","linkableTitle":"WikiCup 2015: The results"}-->
WikiCup 2015 is now in the books! Congrats to our finalists and winners, and to everyone who took part in this year's competition.
This year's results were an exact replica of last year's competition. For the second year in a row, the 2015 WikiCup champion is Godot13 (submissions) (FP bonus points). All of his points were earned for an impressive 253 featured pictures and their associated bonus points (5060 and 1695, respectively). His entries constituted scans of currency from all over the world and scans of medallions awarded to participants of the U.S. Space program. Cwmhiraeth (submissions) came in second place; she earned by far the most bonus points (4082), for 4 featured articles, 15 good articles, and 147 DYKs, mostly about in her field of expertise, natural science. Cas Liber (submissions), a finalist every year since 2010, came in third, with 2379 points.
Our newcomer award, presented to the best-performing new competitor in the WikiCup, goes to Rationalobserver (submissions). Everyone should be very proud of the work they accomplished. We will announce our other award winners soon.
A full list of our award winners are:
Godot13 (submissions) (FP bonus points) wins the prize for first place and the FP prize for 330 featured pictures in the final round.
Cwmhiraeth (submissions) wins the prize for second place and the DYK prize for 160 did you knows in the final round (310 in all rounds).
Cas Liber (submissions) wins the prize for third place and the FA prize for 26 featured articles in all rounds.
Harrias (submissions) wins a final 8 prize and the FL prize for 11 featured lists.
Rodw (submissions) wins the most prizes: a final 8 prize, the GA prize for 41 good articles, and the topic prize for a 13-article good topic and an 8-article featured topic, both in round 3.
ThaddeusB (submissions) wins the news prize for the most news articles in round 3.
We warmly invite all of you to sign up for next year's competition. Discussions and polls concerning potential rules changes are also open, and all are welcome to participate. The WikiCup judges will be back in touch over the coming months, and we hope to see you all in the 2016 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2015-11-24T17:05:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-ArbCom_elections_are_now_open!-2015-11-24T17:05:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2015-11-24T17:05:00.000Z-ArbCom_elections_are_now_open!"],"text":"ArbCom elections are now open!","linkableTitle":"ArbCom elections are now open!"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2015-11-24T17:05:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-ArbCom_elections_are_now_open!-2015-11-24T17:05:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2015-11-24T17:05:00.000Z-ArbCom_elections_are_now_open!"],"text":"ArbCom elections are now open!","linkableTitle":"ArbCom elections are now open!"}-->
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-11-24T17:05:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2015-11-24T17:05:00.000Z-ArbCom_elections_are_now_open!","replies":[]}}-->
And may all your days be merry and bright . . . Cheers. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 19:16, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-12-21T19:16:00.000Z","author":"Dirtlawyer1","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Dirtlawyer1-2015-12-21T19:16:00.000Z-Merry_Christmas,_TQE!","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2015-12-22T06:47:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiCup_2016_is_just_around_the_corner...-2015-12-22T06:47:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2015-12-22T06:47:00.000Z-WikiCup_2016_is_just_around_the_corner..."],"text":"WikiCup 2016 is just around the corner...","linkableTitle":"WikiCup 2016 is just around the corner..."}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2015-12-22T06:47:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiCup_2016_is_just_around_the_corner...-2015-12-22T06:47:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2015-12-22T06:47:00.000Z-WikiCup_2016_is_just_around_the_corner..."],"text":"WikiCup 2016 is just around the corner...","linkableTitle":"WikiCup 2016 is just around the corner..."}-->
Hello everyone, and we would like to wish you all a happy holiday season. As you will probably already know, the 2016 WikiCup begins in the new year; there is still time to sign up. There are some changes we'd like to announce before the competition begins.
After two years of serving as WikiCup judge, User:Miyagawa has stepped down as judge. He deserves great thanks and recognition for his dedication and hard work, and for providing necessary transition for a new group of judges in last year's Cup. Joining Christine (User:Figureskatingfan) and Jason (User:Sturmvogel 66) is Andrew (User:Godot13), a very successful WikiCup competitor and expert in Featured Pictures; he won the two previous competitions. This is a strong judging team, and we anticipate lots of enjoyment and good work coming from our 2016 competitors.
We would also like to announce one change in how this year's WikiCup will be run. In the spirit of sportsmanship, Godot13 and Cwmhiraeth have chosen to limit their participation. See here for the announcement and a complete explanation of why. They and the judges feel that it will make for a more exciting, enjoyable, and productive competition.
The discussions/polls concerning the next competition's rules will be closed soon, and rules changes will be made clear on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring and talk pages. The judges are committed to not repeating the confusion that occurred last year and to ensuring that the new rules are both fair and in the best interests of the competition, which is, first and foremost, about improving Wikipedia.
If you have any questions or concerns, the judges can be reached on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, on their talk pages, or by email. We hope you will all join us in trying to make the 2015 WikiCup the most productive and enjoyable yet. You are receiving this message because you are listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Figureskatingfan (talk), and Godot13 (talk).--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:47, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-12-22T06:47:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2015-12-22T06:47:00.000Z-WikiCup_2016_is_just_around_the_corner...","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-01-06T17:42:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Guild_of_Copy_Editors_2015_End_of_Year_Report-2016-01-06T17:42:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-01-06T17:42:00.000Z-Guild_of_Copy_Editors_2015_End_of_Year_Report"],"text":"Guild of Copy Editors 2015 End of Year Report","linkableTitle":"Guild of Copy Editors 2015 End of Year Report"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-01-06T17:42:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Guild_of_Copy_Editors_2015_End_of_Year_Report-2016-01-06T17:42:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-01-06T17:42:00.000Z-Guild_of_Copy_Editors_2015_End_of_Year_Report"],"text":"Guild of Copy Editors 2015 End of Year Report","linkableTitle":"Guild of Copy Editors 2015 End of Year Report"}-->
To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by Jonesey95 via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:42, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-01-06T17:42:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-01-06T17:42:00.000Z-Guild_of_Copy_Editors_2015_End_of_Year_Report","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-01-07T18:04:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiCup_2016:_Game_On!-2016-01-07T18:04:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-01-07T18:04:00.000Z-WikiCup_2016:_Game_On!"],"text":"WikiCup 2016: Game On!","linkableTitle":"WikiCup 2016: Game On!"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-01-07T18:04:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiCup_2016:_Game_On!-2016-01-07T18:04:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-01-07T18:04:00.000Z-WikiCup_2016:_Game_On!"],"text":"WikiCup 2016: Game On!","linkableTitle":"WikiCup 2016: Game On!"}-->
We are about to enter the second week of the 2016 WikiCup. The most recent player to sign up brings the current total to 101 contestants. Signups close on 5 February. If you’re interested, you can join this year's WikiCup here.
We are aware that in some areas the scoring bot’s numbers are a little bit off (i.e., overly generous) and are working to have that corrected as soon as possible.--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:04, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-01-07T18:04:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-01-07T18:04:00.000Z-WikiCup_2016:_Game_On!","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-01-07T18:08:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiCup_2016:_Game_On!_2-2016-01-07T18:08:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-01-07T18:08:00.000Z-WikiCup_2016:_Game_On!_2"],"text":"WikiCup 2016: Game On!","linkableTitle":"WikiCup 2016: Game On! 2"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-01-07T18:08:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiCup_2016:_Game_On!_2-2016-01-07T18:08:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-01-07T18:08:00.000Z-WikiCup_2016:_Game_On!_2"],"text":"WikiCup 2016: Game On!","linkableTitle":"WikiCup 2016: Game On! 2"}-->
We are about to enter the second week of the 2016 WikiCup. The most recent player to sign up brings the current total to 101 contestants. Signups close on 5 February. If you’re interested, you can join this year's WikiCup here.
We are aware that in some areas the scoring bot’s numbers are a little bit off (i.e., overly generous) and are working to have that corrected as soon as possible.--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:08, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-01-07T18:08:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-01-07T18:08:00.000Z-WikiCup_2016:_Game_On!_2","replies":[]}}-->
The Game (mind game), an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.--Jack Upland (talk) 09:05, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-01-12T09:05:00.000Z","author":"Jack Upland","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Jack_Upland-2016-01-12T09:05:00.000Z-The_Game","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-02-08T02:31:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-2016_GA_Cup-2016-02-08T02:31:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-02-08T02:31:00.000Z-2016_GA_Cup"],"text":"2016 GA Cup","linkableTitle":"2016 GA Cup"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-02-08T02:31:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-2016_GA_Cup-2016-02-08T02:31:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-02-08T02:31:00.000Z-2016_GA_Cup"],"text":"2016 GA Cup","linkableTitle":"2016 GA Cup"}-->
We would like to announce the start of the 3rd GA Cup, a competition that seeks to encourage the reviewing of Good article nominations! Thus far, there have been two GA Cups; both were successful in reaching our goals of significantly reducing the traditionally long queue at GAN, so we're doing it again. Currently, there are over 500 nominations listed and about 450 articles waiting to be reviewed. We hope that we can again make an impact this time.
The 3rd GA Cup will begin on March 1, 2016. Four rounds are currently scheduled (which will bring the competition to a close on July 31, 2016), but this may change based on participant numbers. There will be slight changes to the scoring system, based upon feedback we've received in the months since GA Cup #2. The sign-up and submissions process will remain the same. We're also looking to spice up the competition a bit by running parallel competitions. Finally, there's a possibility of assisting a WikiProject Good Articles backlog drive in the last three weeks of February, before our competition. Please stay tuned for more information as we get it.
Sign-ups for the upcoming competition are currently open and will close on February 20, 2015. Everyone is welcome to join; new and old editors, so sign-up now!
If you have any questions, take a look at the FAQ page and/or contact one of the judges.
To subscribe or unsubscribe to future GA Cup newsletters, please add or remove your name to our mailing list. If you are a participant, you will be on the mailing list no matter what as this is the easiest way to communicate between all participants.
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-03-01T02:39:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiCup_2015_March_newsletter-2016-03-01T02:39:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-03-01T02:39:00.000Z-WikiCup_2015_March_newsletter"],"text":"WikiCup 2015 March newsletter","linkableTitle":"WikiCup 2015 March newsletter"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-03-01T02:39:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiCup_2015_March_newsletter-2016-03-01T02:39:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-03-01T02:39:00.000Z-WikiCup_2015_March_newsletter"],"text":"WikiCup 2015 March newsletter","linkableTitle":"WikiCup 2015 March newsletter"}-->
One of Adam Cuerden’s several quality restorations during round 1
That's it, the first round is done, sign-ups are closed and we're into round 2. Forty-seven competitors move into this round (a bit shy of the expected 64), and we are roughly broken into eight groups of six. The top two of each group will go through to round 3, and then the top scoring 16 "wildcards" across all groups.
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-03-01T03:38:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-2016_GA_Cup-Round_1-2016-03-01T03:38:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-03-01T03:38:00.000Z-2016_GA_Cup-Round_1"],"text":"2016 GA Cup-Round 1","linkableTitle":"2016 GA Cup-Round 1"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-03-01T03:38:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-2016_GA_Cup-Round_1-2016-03-01T03:38:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-03-01T03:38:00.000Z-2016_GA_Cup-Round_1"],"text":"2016 GA Cup-Round 1","linkableTitle":"2016 GA Cup-Round 1"}-->
The 3rd Annual GA Cup has officially begun, and you can start reviewing your articles/reassessments now! However, sign-ups will not close til March 15th if anybody (who wishes to sign up) has not signed up yet. We currently have 1 group of 33 contestants in Round 1, and we will have 16 Wikipedians left in Round 2. Please be sure to review this information and the FAQ if you haven't already,
If you have any questions, please ask us here where all of the judges (including our newest one, Zwerg Nase!) will be answering any questions you may have. You can also feel free to ask us on our talk pages/send an email to us (information is here).
To subscribe or unsubscribe to future GA Cup newsletters, please add or remove your name to our mailing list. If you are a participant still competing, you will be on the mailing list no matter what as this is the easiest way to communicate between all participants.
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-03-02T16:05:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiCup_2016_March_newsletter_(update)-2016-03-02T16:05:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-03-02T16:05:00.000Z-WikiCup_2016_March_newsletter_(update)"],"text":"WikiCup 2016 March newsletter (update)","linkableTitle":"WikiCup 2016 March newsletter (update)"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-03-02T16:05:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiCup_2016_March_newsletter_(update)-2016-03-02T16:05:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-03-02T16:05:00.000Z-WikiCup_2016_March_newsletter_(update)"],"text":"WikiCup 2016 March newsletter (update)","linkableTitle":"WikiCup 2016 March newsletter (update)"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-03-30T02:38:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-2016_GA_Cup-Round_2-2016-03-30T02:38:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-03-30T02:38:00.000Z-2016_GA_Cup-Round_2"],"text":"2016 GA Cup-Round 2","linkableTitle":"2016 GA Cup-Round 2"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-03-30T02:38:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-2016_GA_Cup-Round_2-2016-03-30T02:38:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-03-30T02:38:00.000Z-2016_GA_Cup-Round_2"],"text":"2016 GA Cup-Round 2","linkableTitle":"2016 GA Cup-Round 2"}-->
Wednesday saw the end of Round 1. Sainsf took out Round 1 with an amazing score of 765. In second place, MPJ-DK earned an astounding 742 points, and in third place, FunkMonk received 610 points.
In Round 1, 206 reviews were completed, more than any other year! At the beginning of March, there were 595 outstanding nominations in the GAN queue; by the end of Round 1, there were 490. We continue to make a difference at GAN and throughout Wikipedia, something we should all be proud of. Thanks to all our competitors for helping to make the GA Cup a continued success, and for your part in helping other editors improve articles. We hope to see all remaining users fighting it out in Round 2 so we can lower the backlog as much as possible.
To qualify for the second round, you needed to make it into the top 16 of participants. Users were placed in 4 random pools of 4. To qualify for Round 3, the top 2 in each pool will progress, and there will also be one wildcard. This means that the participant who comes in 9th place (all pools combined) will also move on. Round 2 will start on April 1 at 0:00:01 UTC and end on April 28 at 23:59:59 UTC. Information about Round 2 and the pools can be found here
Also, remember that a major rule change will go into effect starting on April 1, which marks the beginning of Round Two. Round 1 had an issue brought up in the rules, which we are correcting with this clarification. We believe that this change will make the competition more inherently fair. The new rule is: All reviews must give the nominator (or anyone else willing to improve the article) time to address the issues at hand, even if the article would qualify for what is usually called a "quick fail" in GA terms. To avoid further confusion, we have updated the scoring page, replacing the term "quick fail" with the term "fail without granting time for improvements". We expect all reviewers to put a review on hold for seven days in cases such as these as well, in order to apply the same standards to every competitor. The judges will strictly enforce this new rule.
To subscribe or unsubscribe to future GA Cup newsletter, please add or remove your name to our mailing list. If you are a participant still competing, you will be on the mailing list no matter what as this is the easiest way to communicate between all participants.
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-04-06T02:47:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Guild_of_Copy_Editors_April_2016_Newsletter-2016-04-06T02:47:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-04-06T02:47:00.000Z-Guild_of_Copy_Editors_April_2016_Newsletter"],"text":"Guild of Copy Editors April 2016 Newsletter","linkableTitle":"Guild of Copy Editors April 2016 Newsletter"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-04-06T02:47:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Guild_of_Copy_Editors_April_2016_Newsletter-2016-04-06T02:47:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-04-06T02:47:00.000Z-Guild_of_Copy_Editors_April_2016_Newsletter"],"text":"Guild of Copy Editors April 2016 Newsletter","linkableTitle":"Guild of Copy Editors April 2016 Newsletter"}-->
March drive: Thanks to everyone who participated in last month's backlog-reduction drive. Of the 28 people who signed up, 21 copyedited at least one article. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here.
April blitz: The one-week April blitz, again targeting our long requests list, will run from April 17–23. Awards will be given to everyone who copyedits at least one article from the requests page. Sign up here!
May drive: The month-long May backlog-reduction drive, with extra credit for articles tagged in March, April, and May 2015, and all request articles, begins May 1. Sign up now!
Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Jonesey95, Miniapolis, and Baffle gab1978.
To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-05-03T02:22:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-2016_GA_Cup-Round_3-2016-05-03T02:22:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-05-03T02:22:00.000Z-2016_GA_Cup-Round_3"],"text":"2016 GA Cup-Round 3","linkableTitle":"2016 GA Cup-Round 3"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-05-03T02:22:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-2016_GA_Cup-Round_3-2016-05-03T02:22:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-05-03T02:22:00.000Z-2016_GA_Cup-Round_3"],"text":"2016 GA Cup-Round 3","linkableTitle":"2016 GA Cup-Round 3"}-->
Thursday saw the end of Round 2. Sainsf once again took out Round 2 with an amazing score of 996 (a higher score then he received in Round 1!). In second place, MPJ-DK earned an astounding 541 points, and in third place, Carbrera received 419 points.
In Round 2, 142 reviews were completed! At the beginning of April, there were 486 outstanding nominations in the GAN queue; by the end of Round 1, there were 384. Another demonstrable way in which this competition has made a difference is in the length of time articles languish in the queue. At the beginning of this GA Cup, the longest wait was over 9 months [1]; at the end of Round 2, the longest wait had decreased significantly, to a little over 5 months.[2] It's clear that we continue to make a difference at GAN and throughout Wikipedia, something we should all be proud of. Thanks to all our competitors for helping to make the GA Cup a continued success, and for your part in helping other editors improve articles. We hope to see all remaining users fighting it out in Round 3 so we can keep lowering the backlog as much as possible.
To qualify for the third round, contestants had to earn the two highest scores in each of the four pools in Round 2; plus, one wildcard. We had an unusual occurrence happen in Round 2: because only one contestant submitted reviews in one pool, we selected the contestant with the next highest score to move forward to Round 3. (There will be a rule change for future competitions in case something like this happens again.) For Round 3, users were placed in 3 random pools of 3. To qualify for the Final of the 3rd Annual GA Cup, the top user in each pool will progress, and there will also be one wildcard. This means that the participant who comes in 4th place (all pools combined) will also move on. Round 3 will start on May 1 at 0:00:01 UTC and end on May 29 at 23:59:59 UTC. Information about Round 3 and the pools can be found here.
To subscribe or unsubscribe to future GA Cup newsletter, please add or remove your name to our mailing list. If you are a participant still competing, you will be on the mailing list no matter what as this is the easiest way to communicate between all participants.
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-05-05T02:59:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiCup_2016_May_newsletter-2016-05-05T02:59:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-05-05T02:59:00.000Z-WikiCup_2016_May_newsletter"],"text":"WikiCup 2016 May newsletter","linkableTitle":"WikiCup 2016 May newsletter"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-05-05T02:59:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiCup_2016_May_newsletter-2016-05-05T02:59:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-05-05T02:59:00.000Z-WikiCup_2016_May_newsletter"],"text":"WikiCup 2016 May newsletter","linkableTitle":"WikiCup 2016 May newsletter"}-->
FP of Christ Church Cathedral, Falkland Islands by Godot13
Round 2 is over and 35 competitors have moved on to Round 3.
It has been brought to our attention that we made a mistake in the last newsletter. In the last newsletter, we said that the "4th place" overall would make the Final along with the top user from each pool. However, the users who will advance will be the top user from each pool along with "4th and 5th place" overall.
We apologize for any inconvenience or confusion that we caused.
To subscribe or unsubscribe to future GA Cup newsletter, please add or remove your name to our mailing list. If you are a participant still competing, you will be on the mailing list no matter what as this is the easiest way to communicate between all participants.
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-06-03T00:24:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-2016_GA_Cup-Finals-2016-06-03T00:24:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-06-03T00:24:00.000Z-2016_GA_Cup-Finals"],"text":"2016 GA Cup-Finals","linkableTitle":"2016 GA Cup-Finals"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-06-03T00:24:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-2016_GA_Cup-Finals-2016-06-03T00:24:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-06-03T00:24:00.000Z-2016_GA_Cup-Finals"],"text":"2016 GA Cup-Finals","linkableTitle":"2016 GA Cup-Finals"}-->
Tuesday saw the end of Round 3. Sainsf, for the third time, won with a sizable 487 points and a shocking 29 articles reviewed. In second, MPJ-DK had 168 points and 7 reviewed articles. In second place, MPJ-DK earned 168 points with just 7 articles, and in third place, Carbrera received 137 points with just 9 articles. Our two wildcard slots went to J Milburn with 122 points and Sturmvogel 66 with 101 points.
In Round 3, 65 reviews were completed! At the beginning of the GA Cup, there were 595 outstanding nominations in the GAN queue; by the end of Round 3, there were 394. Another demonstrable way in which this competition has made a difference is in the length of time articles languish in the queue. At the beginning of the GA Cup, the longest wait was over 9 months [3]; at the end of Round 3, the longest wait had decreased significantly, to a little over 5 months [4]—nothing before 2016. It's clear that we continue to make a difference at GAN and throughout Wikipedia, something we should all be proud of. Thanks to all our competitors for helping to make the GA Cup a continued success, and for your part in helping other editors improve articles. We hope to see all remaining users fighting it out in the Finals for the GA Cup so that are successes continue.
To qualify for the Finals, contestants had to earn the highest scores in each of the three pools in Round 3; plus, as well as the top 2 of all remaining users in all of the pools. For the Finals, users were placed in one pool of the remaining five users. To win the GA Cup, you must have the most points. The Finals started on June 1 at 0:00:01 UTC' and end on June 30 at 23:59:59 UTC. Information about the Finals and the pools can be found here. A clarification: in order for the points to count, you must mark your reviews as completed; it's not up to the judges to ensure that all reviews are completed by the end of a round.
To subscribe or unsubscribe to future GA Cup newsletter, please add or remove your name to our mailing list. If you are a participant still competing, you will be on the mailing list no matter what as this is the easiest way to communicate between all participants.
Hello everyone, welcome to the June 2016 GOCE newsletter. It's been a few months since we sent one out; we hope y'all haven't forgotten about the Guild! Your coordinators have been busy behind the scenes as usual, though real life has a habit of reducing our personal wiki-time. The May backlog reduction drive, the usual coordinating tasks and preparations for the June election are keeping us on our toes!
May drive: Thanks to everyone who participated in last month's record-setting backlog reduction drive. Of the 29 people who signed up, 16 copyedited at least one article, 197 copyedits were recorded on the drive page, and the copyedit backlog fell below 1,500 for the first time! Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here.
June Blitz: this one-week copy-editing blitz will occur from 12 June through 18 June; the themes will be video games and Asian geography.
Coordinator elections:
It's election time again; how quickly they seem to roll around! Nominations for the next tranche of Guild coordinators, who will serve a six-month term that begins at 00:01 UTC on 1 July and ends at 23:59 UTC on 31 December, opens at 00:01 UTC on 1 June and closes at 23:59 UTC on 15 June. Voting takes place between 00:01 UTC on 16 June and 23:59 UTC on 30 June. If you'd like to assist behind the scenes, please consider stepping forward; self-nominations are welcomed and encouraged. All Wikipedia editors in good standing are eligible; remember it's your Guild, and it doesn't run itself!
Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Jonesey95, Miniapolis and Baffle gab1978.
To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-07-01T03:54:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Guild_of_Copy_Editors_July_2016_News-2016-07-01T03:54:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-07-01T03:54:00.000Z-Guild_of_Copy_Editors_July_2016_News"],"text":"Guild of Copy Editors July 2016 News","linkableTitle":"Guild of Copy Editors July 2016 News"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-07-01T03:54:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Guild_of_Copy_Editors_July_2016_News-2016-07-01T03:54:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-07-01T03:54:00.000Z-Guild_of_Copy_Editors_July_2016_News"],"text":"Guild of Copy Editors July 2016 News","linkableTitle":"Guild of Copy Editors July 2016 News"}-->
Hello everyone, and welcome to the July 2016 GOCE newsletter.
June Blitz: this one-week copy-editing blitz ran from 12 through 18 June; the themes were video games and Asian geography. Of the 18 editors who signed up, 11 removed 47 articles from the backlog. Barnstars and rollover totals are located here. Thanks to all editors who took part.
Coordinator elections:
The second tranche of Guild coordinators for 2016, who will serve a six-month term until 23:59 UTC on 31 December, have been elected.
Jonesey95 remains as your drama-free Lead Coordinator, and Corinne and Tdslk are your new assistant coordinators. For her long service to the Guild, Miniapolis has been enrolled in the GOCE Hall of Fame. Thanks to everyone who voted in the election; our next scheduled one occurs in December 2016. All Wikipedia editors in good standing are eligible; self-nominations are welcome and encouraged.
July Drive:
Our month-long July Copy Editing Backlog Elimination Drive is now underway. Our aim is to remove articles tagged for copy-edit in April, May and June 2015, and to complete all requests on the GOCE Requests page from June 2016. The drive ends at 23:59 on 31 July 2016 (UTC).
Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators: Jonesey95, Corinne and Tdlsk.
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-07-02T02:26:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-2016_GA_Cup-Wrap_Up-2016-07-02T02:26:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-07-02T02:26:00.000Z-2016_GA_Cup-Wrap_Up"],"text":"2016 GA Cup-Wrap Up","linkableTitle":"2016 GA Cup-Wrap Up"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-07-02T02:26:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-2016_GA_Cup-Wrap_Up-2016-07-02T02:26:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-07-02T02:26:00.000Z-2016_GA_Cup-Wrap_Up"],"text":"2016 GA Cup-Wrap Up","linkableTitle":"2016 GA Cup-Wrap Up"}-->
Thursday, June 30 saw the end of the 2016 GA Cup. It was a huge success. In the final, our five competitors reviewed an astonishing 207 articles, the most in any GA Cup final thus far. We continue to reach our goals and make a substantial impact in how quickly articles are reviewed for GA status. On March 1, the start of this competition, the article longest in the queue had languished there since June 26, 2015 [5]; in the July 1, 2016 list, the average wait length is just four months [6]. It's clear that we continue to make a difference at GAN and throughout Wikipedia, something we should all be proud of. Thanks to all our competitors for their enthusiasm, and for helping to make the GA Cup a continued success. Remember that most articles can't even be considered for FA status unless it's been passed to GA first, so our efforts have created hundreds of potentials FAs. That is, as they say, a big deal.
The final this time represented a real horse race between our 1st and 2nd place winners. First-time competitor (who had won all previous rounds) Sainsf earned an impressive 1456 points with 91 articles reviewed during the final. Close behind, in second place was Carbrera, also a first-time competitor, reviewed the most articles (94). Their enthusiasm was a treat to witness. Congrats to you both!
The competition went relatively smoothly, with very little drama this time. We had to clarify one rule: in order for the points to count, you must mark your reviews as completed; it's not up to the judges to ensure that all reviews are completed by the end of a round. We were strict about adhering to this clarification, especially at the end of the final. We intend on stressing it in the stated rules for our next competition, which will be announced soon, so watch out for it. We also intend on applying for a grant through Wikimedia to include gift certificates for our winners, to further incentivize the GA Cup.
MrWooHoo should receive special recognition for acting as our main judge, and for stepping in for the rest of the judges when real-life busyness took over. He reviewed the majority of the submissions during our final round. Thanks for your hard work, and for the hard work of all our judges. We look forward to the next competition.
Again, thanks to all our competitors, and congrats to our winners.
To subscribe or unsubscribe to future GA Cup newsletter, please add or remove your name to our mailing list. If you are a participant still competing, you will be on the mailing list no matter what as this is the easiest way to communicate between all participants.
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Zanimum-2016-07-22T12:37:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Canada_at_the_2016_Summer_Paralympics-2016-07-22T12:37:00.000Z","replies":["c-Zanimum-2016-07-22T12:37:00.000Z-Canada_at_the_2016_Summer_Paralympics"],"text":"Canada at the 2016 Summer Paralympics","linkableTitle":"Canada at the 2016 Summer Paralympics"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Zanimum-2016-07-22T12:37:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Canada_at_the_2016_Summer_Paralympics-2016-07-22T12:37:00.000Z","replies":["c-Zanimum-2016-07-22T12:37:00.000Z-Canada_at_the_2016_Summer_Paralympics"],"text":"Canada at the 2016 Summer Paralympics","linkableTitle":"Canada at the 2016 Summer Paralympics"}-->
Are you having fun, adding unnecessary template to the article? -- Zanimum (talk) 12:37, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-07-22T12:37:00.000Z","author":"Zanimum","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Zanimum-2016-07-22T12:37:00.000Z-Canada_at_the_2016_Summer_Paralympics","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MrLinkinPark333-2016-08-05T14:11:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Nomination_for_deletion_of_Template:Vallejo_(band)-2016-08-05T14:11:00.000Z","replies":["c-MrLinkinPark333-2016-08-05T14:11:00.000Z-Nomination_for_deletion_of_Template:Vallejo_(band)"],"text":"Nomination for deletion of Template:Vallejo (band)","linkableTitle":"Nomination for deletion of Template:Vallejo (band)"}-->
Nomination for deletion of Template:Vallejo (band)
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MrLinkinPark333-2016-08-05T14:11:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Nomination_for_deletion_of_Template:Vallejo_(band)-2016-08-05T14:11:00.000Z","replies":["c-MrLinkinPark333-2016-08-05T14:11:00.000Z-Nomination_for_deletion_of_Template:Vallejo_(band)"],"text":"Nomination for deletion of Template:Vallejo (band)","linkableTitle":"Nomination for deletion of Template:Vallejo (band)"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-09-09T05:36:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Guild_of_Copy_Editors_September_2016_News-2016-09-09T05:36:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-09-09T05:36:00.000Z-Guild_of_Copy_Editors_September_2016_News"],"text":"Guild of Copy Editors September 2016 News","linkableTitle":"Guild of Copy Editors September 2016 News"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-09-09T05:36:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Guild_of_Copy_Editors_September_2016_News-2016-09-09T05:36:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-09-09T05:36:00.000Z-Guild_of_Copy_Editors_September_2016_News"],"text":"Guild of Copy Editors September 2016 News","linkableTitle":"Guild of Copy Editors September 2016 News"}-->
July Drive: The July drive was a roaring success. We set out to remove April, May, and June 2015 from our backlog (our 149 oldest articles), and by 23 July, we were done with those months. We added July 2015 (66 articles) and copy-edited 37 of those. We also handled all of the remaining Requests from June 2016. Well done! Overall, we recorded copy edits to 240 articles by 20 editors, reducing our total backlog to 13 months and 1,656 articles, the second-lowest month-end total ever.
August Blitz: this one-week copy-editing blitz ran from 21 through 27 August; the theme was sports-related articles in honor of the 2016 Summer Olympics. Of the eight editors who signed up, five editors removed 11 articles from the backlog. A quiet blitz – everyone must be on vacation. Barnstars and rollover totals are located here. Thanks to all editors who took part.
Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators: Jonesey95, Corinne and Tdlsk.
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-09-28T22:38:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-GA_Cup_Announcement-2016-09-28T22:38:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-09-28T22:38:00.000Z-GA_Cup_Announcement"],"text":"GA Cup Announcement","linkableTitle":"GA Cup Announcement"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-09-28T22:38:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-GA_Cup_Announcement-2016-09-28T22:38:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-09-28T22:38:00.000Z-GA_Cup_Announcement"],"text":"GA Cup Announcement","linkableTitle":"GA Cup Announcement"}-->
We would like to announce the start of the 4th GA Cup, a competition that seeks to encourage the reviewing of Good article nominations! Thus far, there have been three GA Cups, which were successful in reaching our goals of significantly reducing the traditionally long queue at GAN, so we're doing it again. Currently, there are over 400 nominations listed. We hope that we can again make an impact this time.
The 4th GA Cup will begin on November 1, 2016. Four rounds are currently scheduled (which will bring the competition to a close on February 28, 2017), but this may change based on participant numbers. We may take a break in December for the holidays, depending on the results of a poll of our participants taken shortly after the competition begins. The sign-up and submissions process will remain the same, as will the scoring.
Sign-ups for the upcoming competition are currently open and will close on October 31, 2016. Everyone is welcome to join; new and old editors, so sign-up now!
If you have any questions, take a look at the FAQ page and/or contact one of the judges.
To subscribe or unsubscribe to future GA Cup newsletters, please add or remove your name to our mailing list. If you are a participant, you will be on the mailing list no matter what as this is the easiest way to communicate between all participants.
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-11-02T01:52:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiCup_2016_November_newsletter:_Final_results-2016-11-02T01:52:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-11-02T01:52:00.000Z-WikiCup_2016_November_newsletter:_Final_results"],"text":"WikiCup 2016 November newsletter: Final results","linkableTitle":"WikiCup 2016 November newsletter: Final results"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-11-02T01:52:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiCup_2016_November_newsletter:_Final_results-2016-11-02T01:52:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-11-02T01:52:00.000Z-WikiCup_2016_November_newsletter:_Final_results"],"text":"WikiCup 2016 November newsletter: Final results","linkableTitle":"WikiCup 2016 November newsletter: Final results"}-->
The final round of the 2016 WikiCup is over. Congratulations to the 2016 WikiCup top three finalists:
In addition to recognizing the achievements of the top finishers and everyone who worked hard to make it to the final round, we also want to recognize those participants who were most productive in each of the WikiCup scoring categories:
Featured Article – Cas Liber (actually a three-way tie with themselves for two FAs in each of R2, R3, and R5).
Good Article Review – MPJ-DK completed 61 GARs in R2.
Over the course of the 2016 WikiCup the following content was added to Wikipedia (only reporting on fixed value categories): 17 Featured Articles, 183 Good Articles, 8 Featured Lists, 87 Featured Pictures, 40 In The News, and 321 Good Article Reviews. Thank you to all the competitors for your hard work and what you have done to improve Wikipedia.--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:52, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-11-02T01:52:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-11-02T01:52:00.000Z-WikiCup_2016_November_newsletter:_Final_results","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-11-03T01:38:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiProject_Good_Articles's_2016-2017_GA_Cup-2016-11-03T01:38:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-11-03T01:38:00.000Z-WikiProject_Good_Articles's_2016-2017_GA_Cup"],"text":"WikiProject Good Articles's 2016-2017 GA Cup","linkableTitle":"WikiProject Good Articles's 2016-2017 GA Cup"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-11-03T01:38:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiProject_Good_Articles's_2016-2017_GA_Cup-2016-11-03T01:38:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-11-03T01:38:00.000Z-WikiProject_Good_Articles's_2016-2017_GA_Cup"],"text":"WikiProject Good Articles's 2016-2017 GA Cup","linkableTitle":"WikiProject Good Articles's 2016-2017 GA Cup"}-->
We would like to announce the start of the 4th GA Cup, a competition that seeks to encourage the reviewing of Good article nominations! Thus far, there have been three GA Cups, which were successful in reaching our goals of significantly reducing the traditionally long queue at GAN, so we're doing it again. Currently, there are over 400 nominations listed. We hope that we can again make an impact this time.
The 4th GA Cup will begin on November 1, 2016. Four rounds are currently scheduled (which will bring the competition to a close on February 28, 2017), but this may change based on participant numbers. We may take a break in December for the holidays, depending on the results of a poll of our participants taken shortly after the competition begins. The sign-up and submissions process will remain the same, as will the scoring.
Sign-ups for the upcoming competition are currently open and will close on November 14, 2016. Everyone is welcome to join; new and old editors, so sign-up now!
If you have any questions, take a look at the FAQ page and/or contact one of the judges.
To subscribe or unsubscribe to future GA Cup newsletters, please add or remove your name to our mailing list. If you are a participant, you will be on the mailing list no matter what as this is the easiest way to communicate between all participants.
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-11-03T01:40:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiProject_Good_Articles's_2016-2017_GA_Cup_2-2016-11-03T01:40:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-11-03T01:40:00.000Z-WikiProject_Good_Articles's_2016-2017_GA_Cup_2"],"text":"WikiProject Good Articles's 2016-2017 GA Cup","linkableTitle":"WikiProject Good Articles's 2016-2017 GA Cup 2"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-11-03T01:40:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiProject_Good_Articles's_2016-2017_GA_Cup_2-2016-11-03T01:40:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-11-03T01:40:00.000Z-WikiProject_Good_Articles's_2016-2017_GA_Cup_2"],"text":"WikiProject Good Articles's 2016-2017 GA Cup","linkableTitle":"WikiProject Good Articles's 2016-2017 GA Cup 2"}-->
We would like to announce the start of the 4th GA Cup, a competition that seeks to encourage the reviewing of Good article nominations! Thus far, there have been three GA Cups, which were successful in reaching our goals of significantly reducing the traditionally long queue at GAN, so we're doing it again. Currently, there are over 400 nominations listed. We hope that we can again make an impact this time.
The 4th GA Cup will begin on November 1, 2016. Four rounds are currently scheduled (which will bring the competition to a close on February 28, 2017), but this may change based on participant numbers. We may take a break in December for the holidays, depending on the results of a poll of our participants taken shortly after the competition begins. The sign-up and submissions process will remain the same, as will the scoring.
Sign-ups for the upcoming competition are currently open and will close on November 14, 2016. Everyone is welcome to join; new and old editors, so sign-up now!
If you have any questions, take a look at the FAQ page and/or contact one of the judges.
To subscribe or unsubscribe to future GA Cup newsletters, please add or remove your name to our mailing list. If you are a participant, you will be on the mailing list no matter what as this is the easiest way to communicate between all participants.
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-11-21T22:08:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-ArbCom_Elections_2016:_Voting_now_open!-2016-11-21T22:08:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-11-21T22:08:00.000Z-ArbCom_Elections_2016:_Voting_now_open!"],"text":"ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!","linkableTitle":"ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!"}-->
Hello, TheQ Editor. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-11-21T22:08:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-11-21T22:08:00.000Z-ArbCom_Elections_2016:_Voting_now_open!","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-12-05T15:00:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-4th_Annual_GA_Cup_-_Round_1-2016-12-05T15:00:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-12-05T15:00:00.000Z-4th_Annual_GA_Cup_-_Round_1"],"text":"4th Annual GA Cup - Round 1","linkableTitle":"4th Annual GA Cup - Round 1"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-12-05T15:00:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-4th_Annual_GA_Cup_-_Round_1-2016-12-05T15:00:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-12-05T15:00:00.000Z-4th_Annual_GA_Cup_-_Round_1"],"text":"4th Annual GA Cup - Round 1","linkableTitle":"4th Annual GA Cup - Round 1"}-->
November 28, 2016 was supposed to mark the end of the first round. However, we needed 16 competitors to move on, and currently only 10 have completed articles.
Thus, the judges have come together to let the participants decide what we shall do. Please complete this quick survey to let us know whether you would like a holiday break.
There will be two options for what we will do next in terms of Round 2 depending on the results of this poll.
If the survey indicates that the competitors want a break, we will have a 2nd round after the break ends with just the 10 competitors who have reviewed articles, starting in January (with a specific date TBA).
If the survey does not indicate that participants want a break, we will extend Round 1 until the end of December.
To subscribe or unsubscribe to future GA Cup newsletters, please add or remove your name to our mailing list. If you are a participant, you will be on the mailing list no matter what as this is the easiest way to communicate between all participants.
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-12-08T00:30:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Guild_of_Copy_Editors_December_2016_News-2016-12-08T00:30:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-12-08T00:30:00.000Z-Guild_of_Copy_Editors_December_2016_News"],"text":"Guild of Copy Editors December 2016 News","linkableTitle":"Guild of Copy Editors December 2016 News"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-12-08T00:30:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Guild_of_Copy_Editors_December_2016_News-2016-12-08T00:30:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-12-08T00:30:00.000Z-Guild_of_Copy_Editors_December_2016_News"],"text":"Guild of Copy Editors December 2016 News","linkableTitle":"Guild of Copy Editors December 2016 News"}-->
Hello everyone, and welcome to the December 2016 GOCE newsletter. We had an October newsletter all set to go, but it looks like we never pushed the button to deliver it, so this one contains a few months of updates. We have been busy and successful!
Coordinator elections for the first half of 2017: Nominations are open for election of Coordinators for the first half of 2017. Please visit the election page to nominate yourself or another editor, and then return after December 15 to vote. Thanks for participating!
September Drive: The September drive was fruitful. We set out to remove July through October 2015 from our backlog (an ambitious 269 articles), and by the end of the month, we had cut that pile of oldest articles to just 83. We reduced our overall backlog by 97 articles, even with new copyedit tags being added to articles every day. We also handled 75% of the remaining Requests from August 2016. Overall, 19 editors recorded copy edits to 233 articles (over 378,000 words).
October Blitz: this one-week copy-editing blitz ran from 16 through 22 October; the theme was Requests, since the backlog was getting a bit long. Of the 16 editors who signed up, 10 editors completed 29 requests. Barnstars and rollover totals are located here. Thanks to all editors who took part.
November Drive: The November drive was a record-breaker! We set out to remove September through December 2015 from our backlog (239 articles), and by the end of the month, we had cut that pile of old articles to just 66, eliminating the two oldest months! We reduced our overall backlog by 523 articles, to a new record low of 1,414 articles, even with new tags being added to articles every day, which means we removed copy-editing tags from over 800 articles. We also handled all of the remaining Requests from October 2016. Officially, 14 editors recorded copy edits to 200 articles (over 312,000 words), but over 600 articles, usually quick fixes and short articles, were not recorded on the drive page.
Housekeeping note: we do not send a newsletter before every drive or blitz. To have a better chance of knowing when the next event will start, add the GOCE's message box to your Watchlist.
Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators: Jonesey95, Corinne and Tdslk.
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-12-14T20:03:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiCup_December_newsletter:_WikiCup_2017-2016-12-14T20:03:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-12-14T20:03:00.000Z-WikiCup_December_newsletter:_WikiCup_2017"],"text":"WikiCup December newsletter: WikiCup 2017","linkableTitle":"WikiCup December newsletter: WikiCup 2017"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-12-14T20:03:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiCup_December_newsletter:_WikiCup_2017-2016-12-14T20:03:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-12-14T20:03:00.000Z-WikiCup_December_newsletter:_WikiCup_2017"],"text":"WikiCup December newsletter: WikiCup 2017","linkableTitle":"WikiCup December newsletter: WikiCup 2017"}-->
On 1 January 2017, WikiCup 2017 (the 10th Annual WikiCup) will begin. This year we are trying something a little different – monetary prizes.
For the WC2017 the prizes will be as follows (amounts are based in US$ and will be awarded in the form of an online Amazon gift certificate):
First place – $200
Second & Third place – $50 each
Category prizes – $25 per category (which will be limited to FA, FL, FP, GA, and DYK for 2017). Winning a category prize does not require making it to the final round.
Note: Monetary prizes are a one-year experiment for 2017 and may or may not be continued in the future. In order to be eligible to receive any of the prizes above, the competing Wikipedia account must have a valid/active email address.
After two years as a WikiCup judge, Figureskatingfan is stepping down. We thank her for her contributions as a WikiCup judge. We are pleased to announce that our newest judge is two-time WikiCup champion Cwmhiraeth.
Signups are open now and will remain open until 5 February 2017. You can sign up here.
If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:03, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2016-12-14T20:03:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2016-12-14T20:03:00.000Z-WikiCup_December_newsletter:_WikiCup_2017","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2017-01-01T22:22:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-4th_GA_Cup_-_Round_2-2017-01-01T22:22:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2017-01-01T22:22:00.000Z-4th_GA_Cup_-_Round_2"],"text":"4th GA Cup - Round 2","linkableTitle":"4th GA Cup - Round 2"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2017-01-01T22:22:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-4th_GA_Cup_-_Round_2-2017-01-01T22:22:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2017-01-01T22:22:00.000Z-4th_GA_Cup_-_Round_2"],"text":"4th GA Cup - Round 2","linkableTitle":"4th GA Cup - Round 2"}-->
December 29th marked the end of the first round, after it was extended from its previously scheduled conclusion at the end of November. Because of the smaller pool of contestants this year, it was decided to keep sign-ups open throughout the month of December.
This extension proved to be very helpful as we saw that more users signed up and completed many reviews. Krishna Chaitanya Velaga earned an impressive 402 points, followed by Cartoon network freak with a close 338 points. Shearonink who signed up after our extension was in third with 170 points.
We had a rule clarification in Round 1 which was that many articles were being passed with blatant copyright violations and plagarism occurring in the articles. Thus, the judges have concluded that if an article is passed even if it has a copyright violation/plagarism, we will not provide points for that article as it wouldn't be considered a "complete review" under the scoring rules.
In the end, 94 articles were reviewed by 14 users who will all advance to Round 2. The judges had planned on having 16 contestants advance but since only 14 did, we are changing the pools in this round. We will be having 2 pools of 3 and 2 pools of 4 in Round 2, with the top 2 in each pool advancing to Round 3 as well as the top participant ("9th place") of all remaining competitors. Round 2 will begin on January 1 at 00:00:00 UTC and will end on January 29 at 23:59:59 UTC. Information about Round 2 and the pools can be found here.
To subscribe or unsubscribe to future GA Cup newsletters, please add or remove your name to our mailing list. If you are a participant, you will be on the mailing list no matter what as this is the easiest way to communicate between all participants.
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2017-02-01T21:10:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-4th_GA_Cup_-_Round_3-2017-02-01T21:10:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2017-02-01T21:10:00.000Z-4th_GA_Cup_-_Round_3"],"text":"4th GA Cup - Round 3","linkableTitle":"4th GA Cup - Round 3"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2017-02-01T21:10:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-4th_GA_Cup_-_Round_3-2017-02-01T21:10:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2017-02-01T21:10:00.000Z-4th_GA_Cup_-_Round_3"],"text":"4th GA Cup - Round 3","linkableTitle":"4th GA Cup - Round 3"}-->
Sunday saw the end of Round 2. Shearonink took out Round 2 with an amazing score of 499. In second place, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga earned an astounding 236 points, and in third place, Cartoon network freak received 136 points. Originally, we had plans for one wild card for 9th place, however it appears that both Chris troutman and J Milburn were tied for 9th place. Therefore, we have decided to have both advance to Round 3.
In Round 2, 91 reviews were completed! At the beginning of this GA Cup, the longest wait was over 7 months; at the end of Round 2, the longest wait had decreased to a little over 6 months. It's clear that we continue to make a difference at GAN and throughout Wikipedia, something we should all be proud of. Thanks to all our competitors for helping to make the GA Cup a continued success, and for your part in helping other editors improve articles. We hope to see all remaining users fighting it out in Round 3 so we can keep decreasing the backlog.
To qualify for the third round, contestants had to earn the two highest scores in each of the four pools in Round 2; plus, one wildcard. For Round 3, users were placed in 3 random pools of 3. To qualify for the Final of the 3rd Annual GA Cup, the top user in each pool will progress, and there will also be one wildcard. This means that the participant who comes in 4th place (all pools combined) will also move on. Round 3 has already started and will end on February 26 at 23:59:59 UTC. Information about Round 3 and the pools can be found here.
Also, we'd like to announce the departure of judge Zwerg Nase. We thank him for all his hardwork and hope to see him back in the future.
To subscribe or unsubscribe to future GA Cup newsletter, please add or remove your name to our mailing list. If you are a participant still competing, you will be on the mailing list no matter what as this is the easiest way to communicate between all participants.
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2017-02-20T07:20:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Guild_of_Copy_Editors_February_2017_News-2017-02-20T07:20:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2017-02-20T07:20:00.000Z-Guild_of_Copy_Editors_February_2017_News"],"text":"Guild of Copy Editors February 2017 News","linkableTitle":"Guild of Copy Editors February 2017 News"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2017-02-20T07:20:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Guild_of_Copy_Editors_February_2017_News-2017-02-20T07:20:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2017-02-20T07:20:00.000Z-Guild_of_Copy_Editors_February_2017_News"],"text":"Guild of Copy Editors February 2017 News","linkableTitle":"Guild of Copy Editors February 2017 News"}-->
December blitz: This one-week copy-editing blitz ran from 11 through 17 December; the themes were Requests and eliminating the November 2015 backlog. Of the 14 editors who signed up, nine editors completed 29 articles. Barnstars and rollover totals are located here. Thanks to all who took part.
January drive: The January drive was a great success. We set out to remove December 2015 and January and February 2016 from our backlog (195 articles), and by 22 January we had cleared those and had to add a third month (March 2016). At the end of the month we had almost cleared out that last month as well, for a total of 180 old articles removed from the backlog! We reduced our overall backlog by 337 articles, to a low of 1,465 articles, our second-lowest month-end total ever. We also handled all of the remaining requests from December 2016. Officially, 19 editors recorded 337 copy edits (over 679,000 words).
February blitz: The one-week February blitz, focusing on the remaining March 2016 backlog and January 2017 requests, ran from 12 to 18 February. Seven editors reduced the total in those two backlog segments from 32 to 10 articles, leaving us in good shape going in to the March drive.
Coordinator elections for the first half of 2017: In December, coordinators for the first half of 2017 were elected. Jonesey95 stepped aside as lead coordinator, remaining as coordinator and allowing Miniapolis to be the lead, and Tdslk and Corinne returned as coordinators. Thanks to all who participated!
Speaking of coordinators, congratulations to Jonesey95 on their well-deserved induction into the Guild of Copy Editors Hall of Fame. The plaque reads: "For dedicated service as lead coordinator (2014, 1 July – 31 December 2015 and all of 2016) and coordinator (1 January – 30 June 2015 and 1 January – 30 June 2017); exceptional template-creation work (considerably streamlining project administration), and their emphasis on keeping the GOCE a drama-free zone."
Housekeeping note: We do not send a newsletter before every drive or blitz. To have a better chance of knowing when the next event will start, add the GOCE's message box to your watchlist.
Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators: Miniapolis, Jonesey95, Corinne and Tdslk.
And so ends the first round of the competition, with 4 points required to qualify for round 2. It would have been 5 points, but when a late entrant was permitted to join the contest in February, a promise was made that his inclusion would not result in the exclusion of any other competitor. To achieve this, the six entrants that had the lowest positive score of 4 points have been added to the 64 people who otherwise would have qualified. As a result, some of the groups have nine contestants rather than eight. Our top four scorers in round 1 were:
Cas Liber, last year's winner, led the field with two featured articles on birds and a total score of 674.
Iry-Hor, a WikiCup newcomer, came next with a featured article, a good article and a tally of 282 bonus points for a score of 517. All these points came from the article Nyuserre Ini, an Ancient Egyptian pharaoh,
1989, another WikiCup newcomer, was in joint third place at 240. 1989 has claimed points for two featured lists and one good article relating to anime and comedy series, all of which were awarded bonus points.
Peacemaker67 shared third place with five good articles and thirteen good article reviews, mostly on naval vessels. He is also new to the competition.
The largest number of DYKs have been submitted by Vivvt and The C of E, who each claimed for seven, and MBlaze Lightning achieved eight articles at ITN. Carbrera and Peacemaker67 each claimed for five GAs and Krishna Chaitanya Velaga was well out in front for GARs, having reviewed 32. No featured pictures, featured topics or good topics yet, but we have achieved three featured articles and a splendid total of fifty good articles.
So, on to the second round. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 1 but before the start of round 2 can be claimed in round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points equally.
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is a good article candidate, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth13:52, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-03-01T13:52:00.000Z","author":"Cwmhiraeth","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Cwmhiraeth-2017-03-01T13:52:00.000Z-March_2017_WikiCup_newsletter","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2017-03-06T19:32:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-4th_GA_Cup_-_The_Final-2017-03-06T19:32:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2017-03-06T19:32:00.000Z-4th_GA_Cup_-_The_Final"],"text":"4th GA Cup - The Final","linkableTitle":"4th GA Cup - The Final"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2017-03-06T19:32:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-4th_GA_Cup_-_The_Final-2017-03-06T19:32:00.000Z","replies":["c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2017-03-06T19:32:00.000Z-4th_GA_Cup_-_The_Final"],"text":"4th GA Cup - The Final","linkableTitle":"4th GA Cup - The Final"}-->
Sunday, February 26 saw the end of Round 3. Shearonink finished in first with 616 points, which is more than the point totals for all the other competitors combined! In second place, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga earned an impressive 152 points, followed by Sturmvogel_66 in third with 111 points. Chris troutman and Kees08 each received a wild-card and were able to advance to the Final Round. There was a major error on the part of the judges, and initially, 8 users were advanced instead of 5. This has been corrected, and we sincerely apologize for this confusion.
In Round 3, 71 reviews were completed! At the beginning of this GA Cup, the longest wait was over 7 months; at the end of Round 3, the longest wait is still holding steady at a little over 6 months, the same as for the previous round. By the end of all three Rounds, the total number of nominations increased slightly - this suggests that users are more willing to nominate, knowing that their articles will be reviewed. We hope to see all remaining users fighting it out in the Final so we can keep tackling the backlog.
In the Final Round, the user with the highest score will be the winner. The Final has already started and will end on March 31st at 23:59:59 UTC. Information about Finals and the pools can be found here.
To subscribe or unsubscribe to future GA Cup newsletters, please add or remove your name to our mailing list. If you are a participant still competing, you will be on the mailing list no matter what as this is the easiest way to communicate between all participants.
Saturday, April 1 concluded the 2016-2017 GA Cup. 64 reviews were completed by our finalists. Although the backlog increased by 42 over the reviewing period instead of declining, the increase suggests that the contest is encouraging editors to nominate articles for review.
Congratulations to Shearonink, who is the winner of the Cup, finishing with 672 points! Once again, just as in last round, this is more than the point totals for all the other competitors combined! It was a close race for second place between Krishna Chaitanya Velaga, who achieved 164 points, and Sturmvogel_66, who earned 150. Though Sturmvogel_66 reviewed one more article than Krishna Chaitanya Velaga, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga managed to earn 14 points more due to reviewing older articles. Our two wildcard competitors, Kees08 and Chris troutman, came in fourth and fifth, respectively.
There were some bumps in the competition this time: The sign-up deadline and the first round were both extended due to fewer competitors signing up then was planned for. And there were delays in tallying points and getting out the newsletter. The judges apologize for this latter difficulty. Lastly, mid-way through the competition we bid farewell to Zwerg Nase, who stepped down from their position as judge due to other commitments. Information about the Final can be found here.
Thank you to all of our competitors, and congrats to our winners!
To subscribe or unsubscribe to future GA Cup newsletters, please add or remove your name to our mailing list. If you are a participant still competing, you will be on the mailing list no matter what as this is the easiest way to communicate between all participants.
The second round of the competition has now closed, with just under 100 points being required to qualify for round 3. YellowEvan just scraped into the next round with 98 points but we have to say goodbye to the thirty or so competitors who didn't achieve this threshold; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia. Our top scorers in round 2 were:
Cas Liber, led the field with five featured articles, four on birds and one on astronomy, and a total score of 2049, half of which came from bonus points.
1989 was in second place with 826 points, 466 of which were bonus points. 1989 has claimed points mostly relating to anime and Japanese-related articles.
Peacemaker67 took third place with two FAs, one GA and seven GARs, mostly on naval vessels or military personnel, scoring 543 points.
Other contestants who scored over 400 points were Freikorp, Carbrera, and Czar. Of course all these points are now wiped out and the 32 remaining contestants start again from zero in round 3.
Vivvt submitted the largest number of DYKs (30), and MBlaze Lightning achieved 13 articles at ITN. Carbrera claimed for 11 GAs and Argento Surfer performed the most GARs, having reviewed 11. So far we have achieved 38 featured articles and a splendid 132 good articles. Commendably, 279 GARs have been achieved so far, more than double the number of GAs.
So, on to the third round. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed in round 3. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points equally.
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth13:16, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-05-01T13:16:00.000Z","author":"Cwmhiraeth","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Cwmhiraeth-2017-05-01T13:16:00.000Z-May_2017_WikiCup_newsletter","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Cwmhiraeth-2017-06-30T05:38:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiCup_2017_July_newsletter-2017-06-30T05:38:00.000Z","replies":["c-Cwmhiraeth-2017-06-30T05:38:00.000Z-WikiCup_2017_July_newsletter"],"text":"WikiCup 2017 July newsletter","linkableTitle":"WikiCup 2017 July newsletter"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Cwmhiraeth-2017-06-30T05:38:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiCup_2017_July_newsletter-2017-06-30T05:38:00.000Z","replies":["c-Cwmhiraeth-2017-06-30T05:38:00.000Z-WikiCup_2017_July_newsletter"],"text":"WikiCup 2017 July newsletter","linkableTitle":"WikiCup 2017 July newsletter"}-->
The third round of the competition has finished in a flurry of last minute activity, with 288 points being required to qualify for round 4. It was a hotly competitive round with all but four of the contestants exceeding the 106 points that was necessary to proceed to round 4 last year. Coemgenus and Freikorp tied on 288, and both have been allowed to proceed, so round 4 now has one pool of eight competitors and one of nine.
Round 3 saw the achievement of a 26-topic Featured topic by MPJ-DK as well as 5 featured lists and 13 featured articles. PanagiotisZois and SounderBruce achieved their first ever featured articles. Carbrera led the GA score with 10, Tachs achieved 17 DYKs and MBlaze Lightning 10 In the news items. There were 167 DYKs, 93 GARs and 82 GAs overall, this last figure being higher than the number of GAs in round 2, when twice as many people were taking part. Even though contestants performed more GARs than they achieved GAs, there was still some frustration at the length of time taken to get articles reviewed.
As we start round 4, we say goodbye to the fifteen or so competitors who didn't quite make it; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them (some people have fallen foul of this rule and the points have been removed).
If you are concerned that your nomination, whether it be for a good article, a featured process, or anything else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth05:38, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-06-30T05:38:00.000Z","author":"Cwmhiraeth","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Cwmhiraeth-2017-06-30T05:38:00.000Z-WikiCup_2017_July_newsletter","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MusikAnimal-2017-07-18T20:22:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Your_access_to_AWB_may_be_temporarily_removed-2017-07-18T20:22:00.000Z","replies":["c-MusikAnimal-2017-07-18T20:22:00.000Z-Your_access_to_AWB_may_be_temporarily_removed"],"text":"Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed","linkableTitle":"Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-MusikAnimal-2017-07-18T20:22:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Your_access_to_AWB_may_be_temporarily_removed-2017-07-18T20:22:00.000Z","replies":["c-MusikAnimal-2017-07-18T20:22:00.000Z-Your_access_to_AWB_may_be_temporarily_removed"],"text":"Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed","linkableTitle":"Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed"}-->
Hello TheQ Editor! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot IItalk20:22, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-07-18T20:22:00.000Z","author":"MusikAnimal","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MusikAnimal-2017-07-18T20:22:00.000Z-Your_access_to_AWB_may_be_temporarily_removed","replies":[]}}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Cwmhiraeth-2017-09-01T06:26:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiCup_2017_September_newsletter-2017-09-01T06:26:00.000Z","replies":["c-Cwmhiraeth-2017-09-01T06:26:00.000Z-WikiCup_2017_September_newsletter"],"text":"WikiCup 2017 September newsletter","linkableTitle":"WikiCup 2017 September newsletter"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Cwmhiraeth-2017-09-01T06:26:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-WikiCup_2017_September_newsletter-2017-09-01T06:26:00.000Z","replies":["c-Cwmhiraeth-2017-09-01T06:26:00.000Z-WikiCup_2017_September_newsletter"],"text":"WikiCup 2017 September newsletter","linkableTitle":"WikiCup 2017 September newsletter"}-->
Round 4 of the WikiCup has ended and we move forward into the final round. In round 4, a total of 12 FAs, 3 FLs, 44 GAs, 3 FLs, 79 DYKs, 1 ITN and 42 GARs was achieved, with no FPs or FTs this time. Congratulations to Peacemaker67 on the Royal Yugoslav Navy Good Topic of 36 items, and the 12 featured articles achieved by Cas Liber (5), Vanamonde93 (3), Peacemaker67 (2), Adityavagarwal (1) and 12george1 (1). With a FA scoring 200 points, and bonus points available on top of this, FAs are likely to feature heavily in the final round. Meanwhile Yellow Evan, a typhoon specialist, was contributing 12 DYKs and 10 GAs, while Adityavagarwal and Freikorp topped the GAR list with 8 reviews each. As we enter the final round, we are down to eight contestants, and we would like to thank those of you who have been eliminated for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia. The lowest score needed to reach round 5 was 305, and I think we can expect a highly competitive final round.
Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to reduce the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck, and let the best man (or woman) win! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth06:26, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-09-01T06:26:00.000Z","author":"Cwmhiraeth","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Cwmhiraeth-2017-09-01T06:26:00.000Z-WikiCup_2017_September_newsletter","replies":[]}}-->
American video game developer Insomniac Games, Inc.Insomniac's logo since 2017FormerlyXtreme Software, Inc. (1994–1995)TypeSubsidiaryIndustryVideo gamesFoundedFebruary 28, 1994; 29 years ago (1994-02-28)FounderTed PriceHeadquartersBurbank, California, USNumber of locations2 studiosKey peopleTed Price (CEO)ProductsSpyro series (1998–2000)Ratchet & Clank series (2002–present)Resistance series (2006–2011)Sunset Overdrive (2014)Marvel's Spider-Man (2018–present)Num...
44°48′26″N 20°28′20″E / 44.807237°N 20.472090°E / 44.807237; 20.472090 كلية الحقوق بجامعة بلغراد معلومات التأسيس 1808 الموقع الجغرافي إحداثيات 44°48′26″N 20°28′20″E / 44.8072°N 20.4721°E / 44.8072; 20.4721 البلد صربيا إحصاءات عدد الطلاب 8000 عدد الموظفين 115 الموقع الموقع الرس
Pusat Antariksa Lyndon B. JohnsonJSC dilihat dari angkasa tahun 1989Informasi lembagaDibentuk01 November 1961 (1961-11-01)[1]Nomenklatur lembaga sebelumnyaSpace Task GroupWilayah hukumPemerintah federal A.S.Kantor pusatAlamat: 2101 NASA Road 1, Houston, TX 77058, Amerika Serikat, Telepon: (281) 483-0123Pegawai3.200 karyawan sipilPejabat eksekutifEllen Ochoa, DirekturLembaga indukNational Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)Situs webLaman beranda JSC Koordinat: 29°33′47�...
Beethoven-herdenkingsmuseum Slot Brunswick, 2007 Locatie Martonvásár Coördinaten 47° 19′ NB, 18° 47′ OL Type muziekmuseum Thema Ludwig van Beethoven Detailkaart Portaal Kunst & Cultuur De Beethoven-herdenkingsmuseum, ook wel Beethoven Memorial Hall, Hongaars: Beethoven Emlekmuzeum, is een museum in het Slot Brunswick in Martonvásár, Hongarije. Het ligt op 32 kilometer van de hoofdstad Boedapest. Het museum is gewijd aan Ludwig van Beethoven en toont allerle...
San Antonio Localidad Paradise San AntonioLocalización de San Antonio en UruguayCoordenadas 34°27′03″S 56°04′53″O / -34.45083333, -56.08138889Entidad Localidad • País Uruguay • Departamento Canelones • Municipio San AntonioTeniente Coronel Eren JeagerEventos históricos • Fundación 14 de enero de 400Altitud • Media 50 m s. n. m.Población (2011) • Total 90,000,000[1] hab.Huso horario U...
American television personality and stunt performer (1977–2011) Ryan DunnDunn at the Jackass 3D London premiere in November 2010BornRyan Matthew Dunn(1977-06-11)June 11, 1977Medina, Ohio, U.S.DiedJune 20, 2011(2011-06-20) (aged 34)West Goshen Township, Pennsylvania, U.S.Cause of deathCar accidentResting placeHighland Drive Cemetery, Brecksville, Ohio, U.S.Other namesRandom HeroPrima DunnaPlugsEducationWest Chester East High SchoolOccupationsStunt performertelevision personali...
«Альтмарк» Altmark Німецький танкер «Альтмарк» Служба Тип/клас нафтовий танкер Держава прапора Третій Рейх Належність Крігсмаріне Корабельня Howaldtswerke-Deutsche Werft, Кіль Замовлено 15 травня 1936 Закладено 15 червня 1936 Спущено на воду 13 листопада 1937 Введено в експлуатацію 14 серпня...
Jaap Engelaan Geboren 29 juni 1905, Rijswijk Overleden 2 december 1944, Apeldoorn Land Nederland Groep Landelijke Organisatie voor Hulp aan Onderduikers,Groep Albrecht Jacob (Jaap) Engelaan (Rijswijk, 29 juni 1905[1] – Apeldoorn, 2 december 1944)[2] was een Nederlands verzetsstrijder in de Tweede Wereldoorlog. Hij behoorde tot de Veenendaalse afdeling van de Landelijke Organisatie voor Hulp aan Onderduikers (LO). Engelaan werd min of meer bij toeval gearresteerd met sp...
Đối với các định nghĩa khác, xem Nguyễn Thị Nga. Nguyễn Thị NgaChức vụChánh án Tòa án nhân dân tỉnh Thanh HóaNhiệm kỳ12 tháng 8 năm 2016 – nay7 năm, 115 ngàyTiền nhiệmNguyễn Thành BộKế nhiệmđương nhiệmVị tríTỉnh Thanh Hóa, Việt NamPhó Chánh ánPhạm Quốc Bảo Phó Chánh án Tòa án nhân dân tỉnh Thanh HóaNhiệm kỳ11 tháng 4 năm 2014 – 2016Chánh ánNguyễn Thành Bộ...
Maria Rosaria (Mara) Carfagna (kelahiran 18 Desember 1975) adalah seorang politikus Italia Latar belakang Carfagna lahir di Salerno Pranala luar Ministry biography Diarsipkan 2008-05-12 di Wayback Machine. Personal blog Diarsipkan 2009-05-28 di Wayback Machine. Mara Carfagna - slideshow and video by The Huffington Post lbsKabinet Berlusconi IV (2008–11) Berlusconi Tremonti Maroni Alfano Palma Frattini Sacconi Fazio Gelmini La Russa Scajola Romani Zaia Romano Prestigiacomo Matteoli Bondi Gal...
Südansicht Möglicherweise eine Darstellung der heiligen Elisabeth von Thüringen Die römisch-katholische Filialkirche St. Christof am Hum (slowenisch: Podružnična cerkev na Humu) steht einsam auf dem bewaldeten Bergrücken Hum bei Pirk (Brezje) in der Gemeinde Rosegg (Rožek). Sie ist vom Tal wegen der starken Bewaldung des Hügels nicht sichtbar. Der spätgotische, holzschindelgedeckte Bau wurde 1486 erstmals urkundlich erwähnt und weist eine westliche Pfeilervorhalle in Schiffbreite a...
The two-platoon system is a tactic in American football enabled by rules allowing unlimited substitution adopted during the 1940s. The two platoons, offense and defense, are an integral part of the modern game today. History Fritz Crisler was known as the father of two-platoon football. In its earliest iteration, American football — like the sport of rugby whence it sprung — featured squads of players alternating on offense and defense in continuous action without leaving the field. This ...
Not to be confused with Ubiquitin. Ubiquinol Names IUPAC name 2-[(2E,6E,10E,14E,18E,22E,26E,30E,34E)-3,7,11,15,19,23,27,31,35,39-decamethyltetraconta-2,6,10,14,18,22,26,30,34,38-decaenyl]-5,6-dimethoxy-3-methyl-benzene-1,4-diol Other names Reduced CoQ10, unoxidized CoQ10, CoQ10H2, or dihydroquinone Identifiers CAS Number 992-78-9 Y 3D model (JSmol) Interactive image ChemSpider 17216048 N MeSH C003741 PubChem CID 9962735 UNII M9NL0C577Y Y CompTox Dashboard (EPA) DTXSID90912840 I...
Deputy head of state of the Republic of South Sudan First Vice President of theRepublic of South SudanFlag of South SudanIncumbentRiek Macharsince 21 February 2020[1]AppointerPresident of South SudanInaugural holderRiek MacharFormation21 February 2020Websitewww.presidency.gov.ss/riakmachar.php Politics of South Sudan Constitution Executive President Salva Kiir Mayardit Vice Presidents Riek Machar Taban Deng Gai James Wani Igga Rebecca Nyandeng De Mabior Hussein Abdelbagi Governme...
Midnight BoyMidnight Boy at Stockholm Pride 2015Background informationBirth nameJohan Petter GustafssonAlso known asJohan KrafmanBorn (1988-04-06) April 6, 1988 (age 35)Helsingborg, SwedenGenresElectropopOccupationssingersongwriterYears active2008-presentLabels100 Songs, Stereoscope MusicWebsitemidnightboy.seMusical artist Johan Petter Krafman better known by his stage name Midnight Boy (born 6 April 1988 in Helsingborg, Sweden) is a Swedish singer and songwriter. His music is strongly i...
Novel by Delilah S. Dawson For the Star Wars character, see Captain Phasma. For the comic miniseries, see Star Wars: Captain Phasma. Star Wars: Phasma AuthorDelilah S. DawsonAudio read byJanuary LaVoyCountryUnited StatesLanguageEnglishSeriesJourney to Star Wars: The Last JediGenreScience fictionPublisherDel Rey BooksPublication dateSeptember 1, 2017Media typePrint (Hardcover)Pages400 (First edition, hardcover)ISBN978-1-524-79631-0 (First edition, hardcover) Star Wars: Phasma is...
See also: Index of Australia-related articles Overview of and topical guide to Australia Flag of AustraliaCoat of arms of Australia Location of Australia This outline of Australia is an overview of and topical guide to various aspects of the country of Australia. Australia refers to both the continent of Australia and to the Commonwealth of Australia, the sovereign country. The continent of Australia, the world's smallest continent, is in the Southern Hemisphere and borders both the Indian Oc...
This article lists actually existing churches in Prague of some historical or artistic value. The first part contains churches in the historical city centre (Hradčany, Malá Strana, Old Town, New Town and Vyšehrad), the second churches in the outer districts (Prague 3 to Prague 10). Comments Church - short name, patrocinium etc. Confession (use) - confession or another use. Brackets indicate, there are no regular services, the building is not regularly accessible. Established - date of orig...
Fogaras redirects here. For the Romanian city with this name in Hungarian, see Făgăraș. This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.Find sources: Fogaras County – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (June 2012) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) Fogaras CountyComitatus Fogarasensis (L...
1976 book by Edward T. Hall First edition (publ. Doubleday) Beyond Culture is a 1976 book by the American anthropologist Edward T. Hall.[1][2][3] High vs. low context culture Main article: High- and low-context cultures Extension transference Main article: Extension transference Notes ^ Lanigan, Richard (June 1978). Review of Beyond Culture. American Anthropologist. 80. doi:10.1525/aa.1978.80.2.02a00330. ^ Pepinsky, Harold B. (August 1976). Review of Beyond Culture. Co...
.svg)
.jpg)
