User talk:Shdjaoalxmx

Hi Shdjaoalxmx! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Bop34 (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Gagan.0024 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gagan.0024. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Cabayi (talk) 10:47, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|reason I wanted to stand by honesty I just want to say to free this one and block the other one Shdjaoalxmx (talk) 13:02, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

Ya! Thank you for your response I promise to make useful contribution But the thing is I want this account instead of Gagan.0024

Please consider I promise to never use that account ever again Shdjaoalxmx (talk) 05:44, 25 May 2021 (UTC)}}[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Shdjaoalxmx (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Please swap the blocks.This is my primary account.i promise never to use two accounts again Shdjaoalxmx (talk) 09:44, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

It appears that Sphilbrick has unblocked you. Please see their reminder below. ^{!eM yreuQ}LQS 11:29, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have unblocked you. The admin who originally blocked you has expressed concern that your editing plans, so I urge you to familiarize yourself with editing guidelines.--S Philbrick(Talk) 15:52, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Shdjaoalxmx,your latest edits were either frivolous or grammatically incorrect. You have been advised not to make such edits earlier on this thread(you deleted those discussions). Although your edits do appear to be done in good faith, frequent substandard edits and lack of adherence to wiki policy would be taken as purposeful vandalism .It is not going to help you go without facing edit ban or block. Ihaveabandonedmychild (talk) 07:18, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are not a admin to explain all this Shdjaoalxmx (talk) 08:38, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As an fellow editor and someone who cares about the quality of Wiki articles, I am advising you to stop making such edits. Your editing behavior is inappropriate, your competence in writing English is doubtful. Helping other editors to adhere to norm is a part of wiki culture and it is done not to save the editor in question but to maintain the quality standard of the articles . Frequent poor editing will draw the attention of admins and you won't have the excuse that you haven't been advised against your behavior.Better correct yourself.

Help:Archiving Cabayi (talk) 10:33, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please take a second to review your contributions and note that majority of your edits were reverted or required another follow-up edit to fix. These edits are not helpful to Wikipedia, they can be outright disruptive. Please do not worry about your edit count and do not try to artificially inflate your edit count by making lots of small edits which are actually making articles worse. Instead, please focus on making articles better. Sincerely, Anton.bersh (talk) 17:12, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All of your recent edits have been reverted as either making content grammatically worse, or outright vandalism. Please reconsider why you want to edit Wikipedia. David notMD (talk) 00:03, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Given that several editors have warned you about your edits not being grammatically correct, and yet you persist, the next step will be a proposal to an Administrator that you be indefinitely blocked for not being here to work on the encyclopedia. David notMD (talk) 01:00, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Example: In the following: "...and the landing wheels were fitted with teardrop covers,of which were removed during..." you added a comma and the word "of" with no space after the comma. This was incorrect, and reverted. David notMD (talk) 10:18, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jefrey Payeras, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Pattali Makkal Katchi, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. SUN EYE 1 16:47, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

See.....I have given the reason and sources to prove them so please stop re editing my edit

Shdjaoalxmx (talk) 06:45, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Where is the reason? and why are you removing content? Are you using this IP, 122.172.254.63 to edit? SUN EYE 1 08:12, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Because information there is wrong Shdjaoalxmx (talk) 08:29, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Pattali Makkal Katchi, you may be blocked from editing. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 13:55, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes sir.. I added content which you accepted They were third Largest party in 2016 Shdjaoalxmx (talk) 14:24, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry mam....I'm really sorry but Im putting all this sorry because you told me that I will be blocked... please arrange a way where I can talk to you and explain everything

Shdjaoalxmx (talk) 14:28, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I told you that you need to use reliable sources which explicitly verify the the material you are adding, and you can't just remove reliably sourced information that you don't like. I can see that you haven't received a welcome message yet so I will leave you one with a variety of links to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, please read them carefully. You will not be blocked if you follow them but you may be if you repeatedly try to insert unsourced content in articles. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 14:33, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the warm welcome and your humble act that even tough we are opposing taught Mam my only motto is wrong should not reach the people Mam...this same party introduced 108 ambulance which is saving so Many lives today...mam it's a humble request as you also know PMK has been the third Largest party in 2016...I want that to be put up

Shdjaoalxmx (talk) 14:38, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How do you say it as wrong information? Do you have sources for that? You must write what the sources explicitly say. SUN EYE 1 15:49, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sir you what off the talk why are you back suddenly now Shdjaoalxmx (talk) 16:32, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And what source you have for what is already there Mr anbumani ramadoss is constantly saying the party's motto is devolopment of Tamil Nadu and also you claim it as a caste of vanniyars but it's the only party which got reservation for the Dalits

Shdjaoalxmx (talk) 16:34, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

SUN EYE 1 08:18, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Shdjaoalxmx! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Tayi Arajakate Talk 14:34, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply] Getting Started Introduction • Contributing to Wikipedia • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Get help at the Teahouse Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions Department directory Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Verifiability • No original research Reliable sources • Citing sources • Content guidelines What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sockpuppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper) Things to do Task Center • Be bold in editing Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Copy editing • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguation • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruption and addition of unsourced content, significant competency issues.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 21:06, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Shdjaoalxmx. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sfs, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:01, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]