User talk:Sekyaw

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2

Hi Sekyaw

To create this as a new article, please just copy/paste your draft into the article, replacing the redirect, rather than moving the page. That way the actual history of the article, including the previous version, is still present in the history. Since you're the only author of the user space draft, there would be no attribution issue with copying and pasting it. Thanks  — Amakuru (talk) 17:22, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Amakuru: Thank you for helping me understand. Doesn't it also make sense to have the history of the sandbox in the actual article as well to show its progression, or is it best to just simply copy/paste the entire draft into the article? Sekyaw (talk) 18:06, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Personally I usually don't mind about bringing in the history of the article when it was in the sandbox... that's just revisions made in your personal space, and it wasn't part of the real article at that point. But since you want it merged in, I can do that for you.  — Amakuru (talk) 21:21, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Finished doing it. Thanks  — Amakuru (talk) 21:26, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Amakuru: Thank you for the help. Sekyaw (talk) 22:09, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there. There's a discussion on the WWE personnel talk page that could use more editors weighing in if you'd like to do so. Thanks! Happy End of February! DantODB (talk) 05:59, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@DantODB: Wish I got there earlier. Nice to see it sorted out. Thanks for contacting me though :) Sekyaw (talk) 00:13, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thoughts on this Chris "WarMachineWildThing" ^{Talk to me} 22:56, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@WarMachineWildThing: Not sure. At first glance, the info looks kinda excessive and as if it doesn't even belong in the lead. The additions also have some minor grammar errors. If anything, whatever is new should be sorted into the body and out of the lead. Sekyaw (talk) 23:25, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kinda my thoughts hence my revert of it twice now. I also believe the IP that added it is a LTA, no proof yet. Chris "WarMachineWildThing" ^{Talk to me} 23:31, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The editor pushing the new material at Big Gold Belt is clearly the latest IP sock of LTA User:Mangoeater1000. Same interests in wrestling and finances ('x wrestler earned this', 'x belt cost this'), same habit of using bare URLs as refs, same argumentative attitude. By the way, he's currently editing from unblocked sock User:Bbx118. Keep an eye on NWA World Heavyweight Championship, where I have removed his sock section. Cheers. 172.110.215.185 (talk) 20:05, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Luke Harper and Erick Rowan, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discusion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. REEEEEbbon Salminen(talk) 15:51, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sekyaw. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:VanossGaming logo 2015.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:54, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

★Trekker (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:Flaming/MC2008}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Merry Christmas, hope you're having a relaxing time during this period and that next year will be even better for us all here.★Trekker (talk) 13:24, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

On 6 January 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Luke Harper and Erick Rowan, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Luke Harper and Erick Rowan call themselves The Bludgeon Brothers? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Luke Harper and Erick Rowan. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Luke Harper and Erick Rowan), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There is a discussion currently ongoing in which we are trying to reach a consensus if Diva Dirt is reliable. You can view the discussion here. There has only been a couple of people who have responded. We need a wider input from more people. You're response is needed and appreciated. Thanks. Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!} 21:40, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello :) I have seen that you are one of the participants of the Wikiproject YouTube, I thought it important to tell you that this article is considered for deletion here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juanpa Zurita . I'm going to warm the rest of the WikiProject team. Bye :) --Viajaste (talk) 11:09, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I was looking through the history of the Undisputed Era and you started the article over the redirect. Go look at WP:PW/Sources and you'll see WrestleView is one to avoid as it is on the list of unreliable sources. You need to change that reference. Thanks. Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!} 04:36, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Fishhead2100: Per WP:PW/Sources, WrestleView is a proven reliable source. There is no need to change anything. Sekyaw (talk) 04:42, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

So it is. My bad. Since there are two drafts, has everything been moved over that can be moved over? Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!} 04:44, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Fishhead2100: I personally haven’t moved anything over from the drafts. I derived the article from the reDRagon section, as well as my own additions. There hasn’t been many changes since I started it, so I’d assume nothing has been moved over from the drafts as of yet. Looking at the drafts, there are a lot of excessive match results backed by unreliable sources. I’d be careful on moving things over if anything were to be added. Sekyaw (talk) 04:55, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I mentioned that on the talk page of the project. PWMania, Bleacher Report, TPWW, and WrestleInc. were all used. Just keep editing and improving because those two drafts are going to stay as it is as no content was added to the first draft since April 27th while the second draft just had comments on it at the end of last month. I can help where needed. Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!} 05:05, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Scarlxrd at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 02:47, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Scarlxrd at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 12:51, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

On 6 July 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Scarlxrd, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that hip hop/metal recording artist Scarlxrd was once a "smiley" YouTube personality? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Scarlxrd. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Scarlxrd), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why did reverse my editing to beth phoenix I absolutely did nothing wrong but to add all the missing details about her TheBethPhoenix (talk) 07:14, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@TheBethPhoenix: It was a disruptive edit with no improvement to the article. Here are some editing tips for new users. Sekyaw (talk) 12:40, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I was just wondering your rationale for closing Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The B-Team (professional wrestling) as keep. I have never questioned a closure before, but this one surprises me. Although there were 8 keep !votes for it, and 2 delete, the arguments for keep were baseless. These are the 8 reasons for keeping "They've racked up plenty of wins", "The B-Team has earned so many wins and losses", "they now hold the Raw Tag Team Championships", " won the WWE Raw Tag Team Championship at Extreme Rules (2018)", "Have been a long running team, over several iterations and have won the tag titles", "per tag team championship reign", "Tag Team Champions on Raw", " per tag team championship reign and their win at Extreme Rules, this will only lead to a significant level of notability". Not one of the keeps state a policy based reason for it. Just because they won a championship or have been together, it doesn't mean they are notable. One of the keeps even states that by saying it will lead to it, meaning its WP:CRYSTAL. Thanks - Galatz גאליץ^{שיחה Talk} 13:54, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Galatz: I was the one who proposed the deletion, I didn’t close it. I definitely disagree with the result though. It falls under WP:TOOSOON, and might as well be the same situation with Heath Slater and Rhyno (WP:CRYSTAL). Sekyaw (talk) 16:19, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry wrote on the wrong talk page :-) - Galatz גאליץ^{שיחה Talk} 16:21, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I, (TheMasterGuru), would like to invite you to join WikiProject YouTube! We're working on: Writing, cleaning up, and expanding articles about YouTube, in particular, these articles Putting {{WikiProject YouTube}} on the talk pages of articles involving YouTube, and assessing articles with the template. This helps to categorize articles! Sourcing BLP's affiliated with YouTube Updating the project page, and spreading word about the project and more! It seems you might be interested, so please stop by! Thank you.

Hi. I see you created the section for John Morrison. It's very good. Do you want to coordinate with me to create similar sections for other wrestlers? --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 11:40, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@HHH Pedrigree: Thanks, and I'd love to create it for other wrestlers too. Let me know where we should start. Sekyaw (talk) 15:13, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nice. I want to create the articles for WWE wrestlers and legends. I will start with Randy Savage, Hulk Hogan, Ultimate Warrior and The Miz. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 12:17, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@HHH Pedrigree: Cool. I'll get started once I have the time. Just want to point out that I think it's best to put the info on wrestling style before wrestling persona, simply due to the header order reading "Professional wrestling style and persona". Good luck :) Sekyaw (talk) 15:39, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nice. I didn't think about it. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 20:14, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sekyaw. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I can't do this myself so thought I should point out that both Sasha Banks and Bayley as well as Daniel Bryan entered 2nd where Samoa Joe and Sonya Deville and Mandy Rose entered 1st however it is listed the other way around. Lkb20 (talk) 15:30, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm STATicVapor. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Ron Killings, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. StaticVapor message me! 21:38, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Dolph Ziggler, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. StaticVapor message me! 22:08, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Lucha Underground Championship.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:28, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

On 8 September 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The O.C. (professional wrestling), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that The O.C. is the "official, original, and only club that matters"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The O.C. (professional wrestling). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, The O.C. (professional wrestling)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 14:50, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sekyaw,

I just want to show you that The Beat Down Clan is kicked out of their main page and replaced by The Hurt Business (professional wrestling). So I create another new page for TNA stable The Beat Down Clan. The only mistake is that The Hurt Business replace BDC on BDC main page and it would be registrated that The Hurt Business is older stable than BDC.

Best regards, —Uspjeh je ključ života (talk) 14:44, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:48, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Morrison (wrestler), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mustafa Ali. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕 — Preceding unsigned comment added by DominicReymysterio619 (talk • contribs) 22:29, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add content which gives undue weight to some statement about a living person. On Wikipedia we take particular care over articles about living people.

New information, even if referenced, should be added only if noteworthy, relevant and documented in multiple reliable third-party sources. Wikipedia is not a newspaper and material should not be added if it is only gossip or has little longer-term importance, or if the only sourcing is tabloid journalism.

If challenged, the onus is on the editor who adds the content to justify its retention. Thank you. Those websites, while possibly considered reliable, are not stating their source. Because it's a biography of a living person, we have to be careful not to use Wikipedia to spread gossip. That section can be expand when/if Jeff or WWE speak on the matter or some other very reliable source on the subject. Otherwise it's gossip no matter how often it's getting repeated. See Wikipedia:BLPGOSSIP: Be wary of relying on sources that use weasel words and that attribute material to anonymous sources.  oncamera  _{(talk page)} 04:42, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. You can see her full name "Estrella-Kadlec" here:

• [1] (citation #7)

My edit summary had a mistake (I said #8). --Mann Mann (talk) 01:12, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. There is a move request in Talk:Luke Menzies. Can you give your opinion? Thanks. Margarte00 (talk) 16:16, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:VanossGaming logo 2015.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:33, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year!

Sekyaw,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Mann Mann (talk) 04:33, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

See Replacing Current and Currently with As of --Mann Mann (talk) 05:41, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Morrison (wrestler), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dalton Castle.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:58, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited I Dont Know How But They Found Me, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Razzmatazz.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:59, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just highlighting this in regards to changes you made, you state that it’s unsourced yet information was provided to backup Dakota Kai as the new leader of Damage CTRL. On the May 13th episode of RAW during a match between Dakota Kai and Becky Lynch, WWE confirmed through Michael Cole on commentary that Dakota Kai is the new leader of Damage CTRL. I am more than happy to provide video clips and timestamps for you to fix your mistaken edit. 2001:BB6:2B37:C200:916F:3B37:2FE2:DB29 (talk) 00:28, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide a source for Kai being a leader. If you have a transcript of Michael Cole saying that on commentary, please include that as a citation when editing. If a source isn’t included, it can be seen as original research. Sekyaw (talk) 04:18, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Luke Elaine Burke has given you a pizza pie! Pizza promotes WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a pizza pie, whether it be someone you've had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy eating!

For your contributions on Skrillex ! Wishing you and your loved ones the best,

Spread the decadence of a delicious pizza pie by adding {{subst:pizzapie}} to their talk page with a friendly message, or eat this pizza pie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:pizza-munch}}!

L.E. Rainer 01:08, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Black Parade/Living with Ghosts is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Black Parade/Living with Ghosts until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

λ NegativeMP1 03:43, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I know that me creating this discussion directly contradicts what I said here where I'd say I'd try to get the article to GA status, but I don't think the material to do that is there and it's probably better off as part of the original album article. I'm sorry. λ NegativeMP1 03:45, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]