I'd suggest changing the title of your article to indicate it is the United States only (assuming you are not expanding the article for more jurisdictions).--Cahk (talk) 10:02, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Cahk and thanks for dropping by. I'm currently working on a set of related pages, so I'd like to ask for your input. Pages are:
and some redirects. For example: Stop and frisk, Stop and frisk case law, Consensual search. Would you suggest renaming all of them? Some of the titles would get unwieldy..."United States stop and frisk case law", etc.
Consent search case law of the United States probhttps://pastebin.com/UgsFbkZ8ably isn't too unwieldy. For terms that are explicit a country-only phenomenon, I suppose it wouldn't necessarily be needed to add United States to the title.--Cahk (talk) 11:01, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Since other countries have search & seizure protections, and have restrictions on the validity of coerced consent, when there are articles on those cases, it would be appropriate to subdivide this article by country, rather than have the few non-US cases (that have Wikipedia article) ignored. --Bejnar (talk) 16:54, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
An article you recently created, New York City housing crisis, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Drewmutt(^ᴥ^)talk02:25, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
No indication of notability. All sources primary. Further, improper cut/paste move. Would have draftified again, but it was copypasta'd into mainspace. Draft already exists.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
@John from Idegon: why don't you just remove everything I wrote and turn the article into a stub? Darwin Naz wrote an intro, so leave that. Surely, a housing crisis in the biggest city in America is notable, so I think having a stub is valid. Seahawk01 (talk) 03:26, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New York City housing crisis until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki (π, ν) 03:18, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Seahawk01! You created a thread called had article moved to draftspace at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
.jpg)
