WELCOME

    Click here for  Redthoreau's Nuggets of Wiki Wisdom    

I admire the extraordinary work you have done.

I just wanted to give ya a quick shout out and thank you for all the hard work you've been putting in.

I appreciate your willingness to respond to criticism.

(Here is A Barnstar of Peace) For being deeply kind, and reaching out to me!

You have been good at putting an NPOV eye on communism related pages, and are adept at seeing POV patterns.

I like your image gallery.

I like your work.

Good effort on expanding that page. Nice one!

Nice job so far.

This is a well written article.

I appreciate your cooperation, maturity, and understanding.

(Redthoreau) would make a very good admin.

... intelligent and skilled as an editor, level-headed and thoughtful. Good responses.

Redthoreau has shown to be a civil editor with plenty of experience.

I think Redthoreau would do a good job of administering the site according to policy.

An honest, intelligent, knowledgeable, and productive contributor.

Redthoreau is clearly a good editor.

I believe that promoting Redthoreau to a sysop would be a net plus to the project.

I congratulate you for escaping with your dignity intact.

Nicely written closing statement.

... another good wikipedian.

I think you have a lot to offer as an editor, with your extensive knowledge and quick access to references.

Love the Nuggets of Wiki Wisdom.

You have made my Wiki-experience a little less forgettable.

I think your contribution to wikipedia is huge, intelligent and interesting.

Many thanks for your participation in my recent RfA ... (I) will do my very best to live up to your kind words and expectations.

Thanks for responding in such a civil manner ... Thanks once more for being so reasonable about this.

Thanks for providing me other perspectives from notable sources.

Thanks for your understanding.

Thank you for your very kind response.

Thanks for your extensive and valuable contributions to this encyclopedia.

Thank you so much for taking the time!

Thanks for participating. You did a great job at exposing all of the issues.

Thanks for your advice on my talk page. Much appreciated.

Thanks. Its very much appreciated. I'll do all I can to help.

Thanks for your participation in my recent RfA. I will do my very best not to betray the confidence you have shown me.

Thanks for that ... thanks for listening / reading.

Thanks for your note, cheers.

Thank you for this addition. A major improvement.

Thanks for trying to restore some sanity to the article ... your effort is appreciated.

Thanks a lot for your contribution to the discussion.

Thanks for your help!

Thank you! appreciate that. You have a lot of great stuff on that page, much of which I haven't seen before.

Thanks! That's very kind.

Thank you for incorporating my comment about the tags in your collection!

Wow, thanks Redthoreau ... glad it strikes you as "wise"!

Thanks for telling me.

Thank you. You also taught me what to do.

Thanks for the heads up.

Sweet article! Thanks!.

- I do not archive discussions and delete them when they are no longer active or relevant -
If a participating editor is not finished with the conversation I have removed, then please revert me until you feel it is completed.
A full historical record is nevertheless preserved in the page's history and can be retrieved if desired.

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, as I am watching it. If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, then place {{Talkback|Redthoreau}} on your talk. Please click here to leave me a new message.

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Objectivism's rejection of the primitive is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Objectivism's rejection of the primitive (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

RL0919 (talk) 15:33, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]