User talk:NetNus

Please note that there is controversy over whether to honor your request for privacy at Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2007_August_28#.5B.5B:Lynette_Nusbacher.5D.5D. THF 12:12, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dear NetNus, I have no particular axe to grind here and I think I am missing something. What is the issue with Lynette Nusbacher's previous name being mentioned near the top. My understanding is many of us knew Dr Nusbacher as Aryeh via the TV shows and it is under this name that there is sufficient WP notability. Is this best on the article talk page or here? Best wishes (Msrasnw (talk) 15:14, 9 November 2011 (UTC))[reply]

While your intentions are pure, the "formerly" or incorrect "born" promotes the previous name to unwarranted importance and promotes the subject's medical history above all else. ^[1] NetNus (talk) 15:54, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ok - sorry and best wishes and I have no intention of promoting any of the subject's medical history. I only got involved with this when it was up for deletion as while ago and thought it was nice to save the page on someone who seemed to me clearly notable via all their appearances on the TV and being watched by millions. (Msrasnw (talk) 16:31, 9 November 2011 (UTC))[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Wikipedia. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. IrishLad1916 (talk) 11:01, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, NetNus. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Lynette Nusbacher, you may need to consider our guidance on conflicts of interest.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

• Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
• Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
• Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
• Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. --> Belchfire-TALK 00:57, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Lynette Nusbacher, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Dr. Nusbacher, please familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's house style for biographical articles and limitations on editing by those with a conflict of interest. ► Belchfire-TALK 19:18, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard#A little reading is also a dangerous thing.

You should be following this. Uncle G (talk) 09:03, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:15, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, NetNus, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Simplified Manual of Style

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 21:22, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Especially in regards to your latest response on the talk page, I can certainly know where you're coming from with personal experience. A response there summed it up well: don't read too much into the article right now, because right now it's pretty borked in between limited sources and way too many ravenous editors. I do not see this becoming some kind of a nightmare article, but at the moment there's a whooole lotta people getting waved in from multiple places (notice boards, people's talk pages, etc etc) and it's pretty hard to get anything decided on, let alone keep the article edited into any kind of reasonable form. It shall calm down shortly.Human.v2.0 (talk) 22:11, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, a discussion has begun related to Lynette Nusbacher. see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lynette Nusbacher (2nd nomination). People who have a conflict of interest are generally discouraged from actively !voting in such discussions, but it is something I thought you should be aware of. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 03:31, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

While in general, a person with a COI should not participate in an AfD, a person has made some comments about your actions and intentions for which it would be unconscionable for them to be left on the table without you being able to address them. In the spirit of WP:IAR, if you feel you need to respond to those statements, you have my backing. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 18:07, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited North West Surrey Synagogue, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Frederick Morgan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hermera34 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This article has not demonstrated notability of this person. Please review WP:BIO for what is needed.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rabbi Fred Morgan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hermera34 (talk) 10:28, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! NetNus, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hermera34 (talk) 10:28, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, NetNus. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Rabbi Fred Morgan".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 07:21, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]