User talk:MaximusEditor/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions with User:MaximusEditor. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Welcome!

Hello, MaximusEditor, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Mazewaxie 19:11, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 16:55, 19 March 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
	Here is a barnstar for your diligent efforts in diplomatically fighting bias on certain pages. Keep up the good work! Eruditess (talk) 19:40, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

April 2020

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". A lot of inexperienced editors don't understand what we mean by "minor", I avoid tagging anything as minor, just add the edit summary "ce" for copy edit instead. Doug Weller talk 11:04, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

Calling one person "recruiters" at Turning Point USA was very misleading

Or did I miss something? Doug Weller talk 13:06, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

@Doug Weller:, can you clarify what you mean? If I was misleading it wasn't my intent, I mean SnoogansSnoogans even said "... there was nothing in your text to justify the language that multiple TPUSA recruiters were assaulted …". What are your thoughts on me making an edit more in line with what SnoogansSnoogans suggested, that I focus more on the executive order signed by Trump protecting free speech on campus with a brief mention of the physical assault on Berkeleys campus to a "single" TPUSA recruiter? MaximusEditor (talk) 20:09, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

Struggling with a raging toothache and I really don't think I want to get involved. My point was the plural/singular isssue. Doug Weller talk 18:11, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

National varieties of English

Hello. In a recent edit, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. – Joe (talk) 15:33, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Just to add to the standard message: sometimes there is a reason to change between national varieties, e.g. to maintain consistency within an article or align it with the subject's national ties, but if you do that please say so in the edit summary rather than using a generic one like "corrected spelling" (which is also not technically correct). As it is I wasn't sure whether you did this [1][2][3][4] on purpose or just didn't realise that the articles weren't written in American English. – Joe (talk) 15:38, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Taskforce Jupiter invitation

Thank you for your recent contributions to one of Wikipedia's articles related to Jupiter. Given the interest you've expressed by your edits, have you considered joining Taskforce Jupiter? We are a group of editors dedicated to improving the overall coverage of Jupiter on Wikipedia. If you would like to join, simply add your name to the list of participants. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask at the project talk page. We look forward to working with you in the future! --Soumya-8974 ^talk _contribs ^subpages 17:31, 24 October 2020 (UTC) --Soumya-8974 ^talk _contribs ^subpages 17:39, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

DS Alerts

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Jorm (talk) 06:44, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 10:41, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

November 2022

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Turning Point USA, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 10:44, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

Done

Thank you @Doug Weller, I thought I had added in the citation. Thank you for the heads up. MaximusEditor (talk) 03:53, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

You're welcome. Doug Weller talk 09:52, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Have you got any relationship with Turning Point?

Other than possibly being a member. Doug Weller talk 08:32, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

No, not a member. I am familiar with WP:COI policies. I do strive to be a model editor (albeit far from perfect) and am always here to help and welcome advice on how to improve the Wiki-Encyclopedia. MaximusEditor (talk) 23:02, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

Thanks. Doug Weller talk 09:20, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)