User talk:HurluGumene

Hi HurluGumene! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Jtmorgan (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:17, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, HurluGumene, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! भास्कर्bhagawati Speak 15:40, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Altan (band), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cáceres (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:49, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Get Out (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Compilation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:54, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons. Thank you.--John (talk) 05:09, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --John (talk) 05:11, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In this edit summary here you refer to "years of hard work". As you have only been a registered user of Wikipedia a few months, I wonder whose work you were referring to and how you were aware of it?

I also wonder if you know Wikipedia policy regarding those who create new accounts to avoid blocks?

I'm not in complete agreement with all of John's changes, but he has removed a great deal of fancruft and improved the overall state of the article. It's a pity you can't appreciate that. --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 00:03, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you continue to restore unreferenced or poorly referenced material to an article on living people it is likely you will be blocked. Is this what you want to happen? I strongly recommend you raise your suggestions at Talk:Simple Minds. You would do well to consider Escape Orbit's point as well. --John (talk) 05:16, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And on that point, are you Lurulu (talk · contribs)? --John (talk) 05:39, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I also came across your contributions today and I feel you are a sockpuppet of Lurulu (talk · contribs) trying to get around the block. You edit the exact same articles and have the MO, except for recreating articles deleted through AfD. You should address these concerns if they are not true, instead of continuing your edits. Aspects (talk) 17:29, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Altan (band) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• show in [[Athens]], [[Greece]] and a surprise festival show in [[Montrevel-en-Bresse]], France).

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:57, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Altan (band) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• [[Virgin Records]]<ref name="mpibands.com altan">[http://mpibands.com/headline-acts/altan/ MPI (Martin Nolan & Associates (International Booking Agency and Band Management Company based in Dublin,

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:10, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Simple Minds concert tours may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• **'''Germany & Switzerland Tour''' <small>(01-23 February 2014 : extensive tour of Germany (15 shows) + 26 February 2014: 1 show in

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:08, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Jon Anderson concert tours, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alan White (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Jon Anderson concert tours, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Steve Howe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Guitar Heaven: The Greatest Guitar Classics of All Time, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page All That I Am (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Altan (band) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• sign Altan) bought the company.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://liveireland.net/news_linnet.shtml |title=> News & Events : Green Linnet Records Update |publisher=LiveIreland.com |date= |accessdate=3
• before performing their annual new year show on 1st January 2014 at Ionad Cois Locha in Dun Luiche). After a few shows in Ireland, [[Spain]] and [[Scandinavia]], Altan embarked on an extensive tour

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:40, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Altan (band) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Vizcaya

Motörhead (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to German

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Keys to Ascension may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:46, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Keys to Ascension 2 may have broken the syntax by modifying 7 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:51, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Keys to Ascension 2 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:52, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you moving all the lede prose into the article body itself? And why just the Yes album articles? I don't understand your reasoning and I don't think you understand how Wikipedia articles are meant to be structured. All articles must have a lede which act as a summary of the entire article. Please stop with these edits. LowSelfEstidle (talk) 17:25, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Do you really think your edits were relevant? And besides, how can you make such changes without discussing it on their talk pages? Surely some sort of consensus needs to be agreed upon, no? LowSelfEstidle (talk) 21:11, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello HurluGumene,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged List of Boy George concert and DJ tours for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. KaraokeMac (talk) 21:33, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Boy George concert and DJ tours is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Boy George concert and DJ tours until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tawker (talk) 02:30, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have made three reverts in a 24-hour period on 14 On Fire and any other revert to the article could result in being blocked from editing. Aspects (talk) 10:31, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add external links to web pages hosting copyright violations, as you did to Jimi Hendrix. The site you linked is not authorized or licensed to provide access to copyrighted concert footage. If you have added such links elsewhere, please remove them. Thanks! --Spike Wilbury (talk) 18:18, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Univers Zero, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Progressive music (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Strange Sensation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Portishead (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at 14 On Fire. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. — TheMadonnaMusicCN (talk, contribs) 07:30, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

HurluGumene, the continued edit warring will not be tolerated. Please follow WP:BRD; if you know your edits are disputed (by three independent editors in this case), stop making them until you gain consensus. If you continue this, you will be reported for edit warring and possibly blocked. --Spike Wilbury (talk) 20:01, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I see that you've already been blocked, but I'm notifying you that I reported you for edit warring here. --Spike Wilbury (talk) 20:36, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You're truly a jolly good old fellow, Spike_Wilbury. In some country, 70 years ago, you'd be very appreciated. HurluGumene (talk) 20:46, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring and personal attacks., as you did at 14 On Fire. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  → Call me Hahc21 20:27, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HurluGumene (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I didn't start this edit warring: TheMadonnaMusicCN did!!! My edits are reasonable. I was only trying to revert TheMadonnaMusicCN's unreasonable edits. Spike Wilbury, you should block him! Besides, which personal attacks? HurluGumene (talk) 20:39, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

There is no block exemption for edit-warring if you "weren't the one who started it". To be unblocked you must demonstrate that you understand the reason for the block and endeavour to change your behaviour to prevent further disruption; pointing fingers at others is never a valid unblock reason. Please read the Guide to Appealing Blocks for further instructions and advice. Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 22:56, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Follow the simple rules and always provide an edit summary. Following the simple rules shows good faith. Edit's without explanation will often be reverted. -- 109.79.220.129 (talk) 22:14, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wings 1973 UK Tour, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Live And Let Die. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Robert Plant concert tours, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cork. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Robert Plant concert tours, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cartagena. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Big Music (album) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• #In Every Heaven <small>[2010 Recording] (first recorded in May 1982, this is the "lost" track from the ''[[New Gold Dream|New Gold Dream (81/

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:06, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I'm serious! We absolutely should have a reference. Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:31, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi HurluGumene, I saw your edit note questioning why only one release date is included in the infobox. This is a standard format that all articles under the Albums WikiProject are supposed to follow. According to the appropriate style guide "Albums are often released on different dates, on different labels, and on different formats in different regions. This information can be included in a table. Note that the infobox should only include the first release date and label." Basically the later release dates can be included in the article, but only the first day on which the album was released should be noted in the infobox. This is because once it is released in one manner it can be obtained anywhere, even if later releases of the same material are also planned. This is why reissues and expanded releases are also not typically included in the infobox. I hope this helps answer your question. Happy editing! Melicans (talk, contributions) 20:34, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the members' page has used that format for a number of years, so if you want to suggest changes, please use the talk page, like everyone else does. Also, it is not true that any of those former members were temporary. All were considered permanent at the time, according to the sources. One that is not clear is Paul Matters, who is currently listed as a temporary member. I don't think it's appropriate to list someone like Laughlin, who stood in for Evans at a few gigs, next to someone like Bon Scott. Cheers, Bretonbanquet (talk) 23:25, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You don't appear to understand Wikipedia. You do not change something, start an edit war and say "Time for changes" or "please respect my edit which is much better". You have to discuss on the talk page, or you risk getting blocked. Again. Bretonbanquet (talk) 23:39, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Bretonbanquet (talk) 23:52, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Do you actually plan to discuss the article with me at all, or just force your version of it? Bretonbanquet (talk) 00:03, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Bretonbanquet (talk) 00:21, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 for edit warring, as you did at List of AC/DC band members. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  - 2/0 (cont.) 17:40, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HurluGumene (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I'm not guilty, your honor! HurluGumene (talk) 23:23, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. MER-C 11:39, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

When your block expires, do you want to discuss the AC/DC members article with me or continue saying that it's a waste of time? It isn't me who has blocked you, by the way. I'm not an admin, I can't block anyone. Bretonbanquet (talk) 23:44, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've requested a third opinion to resolve our disagreement here: Wikipedia:Third_opinion#Active_disagreements Popcornduff (talk) 21:40, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Widening Gyre (Altan album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tim O'Brien. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Scorpions Revisited, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Warner. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Out There (tour). Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:26, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also see WP:CRYSTAL Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:40, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Postcards from Paradise (Ringo Starr song), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Yesterday, Nowhere Man and The Night Before. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Yes (band), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Toto. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Since you're a frequent contributor to music articles, would you be interested in commenting or reviewing my FAC for the article xx (album)? It's received on editor's comments but no follow-up yet, so anything would be appreciated. Dan56 (talk) 23:25, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on The Police. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Laser brain (talk) 13:03, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You obviously disagree with my edits to Altan (band), but I would appreciate you explaining your reverts. I started a talk page section in good faith, and I would appreciate you commenting there. I think the large timeline as you've restored it is completely unnecessary - it doesn't need to be exhaustive. --Fru1tbat (talk) 23:34, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Who, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hyde Park. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:38, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the notability and verifiability guidelines again. Deb (talk) 12:53, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Supertramp may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:32, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Neil Young, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mountain View. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited América Latina Olé Tour 2016, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Estadio Monumental. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If something has been pointed out to you in a reversion of a faulty edit, per WP:BRD you should be using the article's talk page to discuss this, rather than edit warring to try and force your way with things. In the two cases you have reverted me I could have pointed you to the right sections of the MoS to enlighten you. - SchroCat (talk) 18:20, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Altan (band), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Washington. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Joe Haldeman may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Fiction and Fact]]'') – placed fifth in annual [[Locus Award|''Locus'' Poll]]<ref name=SFAwards/>)</small>
• *[http://www.joehaldeman.com/ Official website]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:20, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your edit on Altan, as per WP:DERRY, this is the consensus on the usage, if not always liked, it does proved a basis for edits on the subject. Murry1975 (talk) 11:10, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You should put lemmy kilometer name back on the motorhead page don't edit something if you don't have information the band will no longer be together after the death of lemmy Kenorg (talk) 11:23, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't get involved in edit warring. You have violated the three revert rule, which I will assume in good faith you did not know about. However, I will revert the edit and i suggest that you take the issue to the talk page and seek consensus. Moreover, if you think you have a source for something, CITE IT. Don't just keep reverting.  InsertCleverPhraseHere ^{InsertTalkHere}  05:07, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It seems that you have been warned multiple times for edit warring. Including being previously banned for such behaviour. As you know, reverting something three times or more is not allowed on wikipedia, see WP:3RR. This is a warning to please not engage in edit waring in the future, otherwise you will be reported to ANI and possibly lose editing privileges.  InsertCleverPhraseHere ^{InsertTalkHere}  05:18, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The End Tour, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hellfest. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:50, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Santana concert tours, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Warner Theatre and Tower Theatre. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:12, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Michel Polnareff concert tours, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Pau and Le Dôme. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contribution to the Jon Anderson page - please ensure you include citations when posting material. This is a Biography of a Living Person and the article needs references. I have a added a tag to that effect. Happy editing! Karst (talk) 22:11, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Pet Shop Boys, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Karst (talk) 16:22, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Please see the MOS on release dates and the template instructions. We only include the first release and the release in the country that produced the film. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 13:04, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Paul O'Shaughnessy (musician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Doherty. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Altan (band), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Washington. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited América Latina Olé Tour 2016, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Angie. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on AC/DC. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Laser brain (talk) 11:42, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I see you have been involved in editing Motörhead. You need to read through all the talk pages for the last 5 months prior to continuing the style of edits you have made, which if you had done so would know no to put English attached to their lede any more.

Current line up (for 25 years)

Lemmy is originally from England, but moved to LA in 1990 permanently, becoming a US Greencard permanent resident

Phil Campbel is Welsh, not English, and has continuously lived in Wales (joined 1984)

Mikkey Dee is Swedish, not English, and has continuously lived in Sweden (joined 1991)

Previous lineups:

Michael Burston is English, but moved to LA in 1990, and left the band in 1995 (11 years in the band)

Eddie Clarke is English, but left the band in 1982 (7 years in the band)

Phil Taylor is English, but left the band in 1984, moved to LA in 1990 after rejoining the band in 1987, and since leaving the band in 1991, returned to England (10 years in the band)

Brian Roberston is Scottish, and left the band in 1984 with Phil Taylor (18 months in the band)

Pete Gill is English and left the band in 1985 (2 years in the band)

They have been an International band 2/3 of its life, the English moniker stopped in 1986, 11 years after Lemmy started the band, and consisted of International members for 25 years, and was not based in England since 1988, 13 years after Lemmy started the band.

If you wish to participate in the Motörhead body of work you need to read all the talk pages first please, and don't forget to put an edit summary so your contribution isn't reverted for failing the rule requiring such edits.

Regards,

Nürö ^{G'DÄŸ MÄTË} 23:33, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Robert Plant concert tours, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Santa Barbara and Arrington. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Deep Purple World Tour 2016, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Perfect Strangers. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Owl City, did not appear constructive and have been undone. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. I have no clue why you reverted half of my edits and can only guess at the other half. This one in particular, where you restored incorrectly formatted references. if you had explained why you made such poor editing choices, I would have been happier. Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:55, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please see WP:NALBUM to explain why the collection of monthly EPs may not be notable. You can't support the article only with Adam Young's own publications (that's what's called WP:PRIMARY sources). You need WP:SECONDARY sources to support its notability. I'm not trying to undo your work or censor the information. I'm trying to follow the rules around editing. Walter Görlitz (talk) 22:01, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello HurluGumene,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Na Mooneys (album) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is significant enough to be included in an encyclopedia, and the artist doesn't have an article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Trivialist (talk) 01:24, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Na Mooneys (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Irish. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:51, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. A tag has been placed on Na Mooneys requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. reddogsix (talk) 02:12, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See here I reverted this addition because it doesn't have a source. Let me know if I can help you here on the site. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:44, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, i have reverted your changes on Acoustic (Simple Minds album). You write that Acoustic is "not a studio album of original material". An album consisting of non-original material can still be a studio album, because the songs have not been previously released (example: Aquostic (Stripped Bare)). Wikipedia defines a compilation album as being "compiled from other recordings, either previously released or unreleased." The songs on Acoustic have not been previously released, but are instead (newly) recorded (in a studio) for this project. Also, you write that "This is a cover (studio) album". Again, a cover album can also be a studio album (example: Aretha Franklin Sings the Great Diva Classics.)-z33k (talk) 15:21, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK! The album is a "covers studio album"... but it should not be seen as Simple Minds' seventeenth studio album! HurluGumene (talk) 15:28, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I just updated the Simple Minds's Wikipedia Template shifting the Acoustic album link in the right Albums section... HurluGumene (talk) 15:39, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, HurluGumene. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Acoustic (Simple Minds album) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Karst (talk) 22:08, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• And a blatant one too. Text taken from the official webpage here when you created the page. Don't do that again please. Karst (talk) 22:11, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 15:07, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Simple Minds, did not appear constructive and has been undone. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Karst (talk) 15:11, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style/Accessibility#Screen_readers It produces the same effect as the Semicolon, so what was the issue?

Also, the "of original material" thing. Do Simple Minds do cover albums or something? If so, even on the new Rolling Stones album, it doesn't list anything about it in the first sentence about it being covered material. --Jennica✿ ^{talk / contribs} 22:40, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, Simple Minds do cover albums!!! About the new Rolling Stones album: it should! HurluGumene (talk) 06:09, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And it does. But that does not mean every other studio album should say 'original material'. That generally speaks for itself. Only if it is a specific covers album does it need to say so, see for instance Honkin' on Bobo. If the album contains both, like Please Please Me, it does not apply. As it was not the intention of the artist to release a covers album, and the secondary sources do not describe it as such. The same goes for a collection of acoustic re-recordings, such as Unplugged (Eric Clapton album). Karst (talk) 23:15, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I totally disagree! Anyway, the words "of original material" are in brackets. What's the problem? Besides, IT WAS the intention of the artist (Simple Minds or Rolling Stones) to release a covers album! Finally, Eric Clapton 's Unplugged is a covers live album, not a studio one. Thus, the wiki article should indicate "covers live album"... HurluGumene (talk) 07:47, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I respect your opinion. However, the sources need to be your guide on this. Do the reviews highlight that these albums consist of 'original material' as opposed to covers? As by inserting 'original material', it suggests that the artist largely records other people's material. The Rolling Stones indeed intended to release a covers album and that is mentioned, similar to Honkin' on Bobo. The Acoustic album by the Simple Minds is described as such, with only the Richard Hawley song described as a cover in the reviews. And the Clapton live Unplugged album falls into the similar bracket as Please Please Me where a number of songs were blues covers. That is different to From the cradle which is a covers album and referred to as such in the sources. If not, then it has no place in the article, as it falls in the original research bracket. But feel free to start a WP:RfC on these matters. Karst (talk) 12:27, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What are these symbols: «in people's mind, this remained Malicorne».

Why are you using them?

Why do you like to make headers as long as possible?

Why did you abandon your other account, Frenchfolk ? --Jennica✿ / ^talk 16:44, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

??? HurluGumene (talk) 18:22, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use » in articles in place of quotation marks. --Jennica✿ / ^talk 11:33, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article Theatre, Club and Arena Tour has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Upcoming. Not notable yet. Fails WP:NMUSIC.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:56, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a suspected sock puppet of Lurulu (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this is a sock puppet account, and your original account is blocked, please also note that banned or blocked users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; and all edits made under this account may be reverted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Someguy1221 (talk) 01:04, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Theatre, Club and Arena Tour is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Theatre, Club and Arena Tour until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:06, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, HurluGumene. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Fall 2016 US Tour, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:52, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Altan - The Widening Gyre.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 23:06, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Live at the NEC – Oct 24th 1989 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Live at the NEC – Oct 24th 1989 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. L3X1 (distænt write) 23:17, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Live – Big Music Tour 2015 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NALBUM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 14:12, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]