User talk:Gobledeegooke

Welcome!

Hello, Gobledeegooke, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Aristophanes68 (talk) 16:15, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank you.Gobledeegooke (talk) 22:59, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for query, Gobledeegooke. I looked at the biographies before I reverted. Shelton is vague, saying that some place Dylan in Chicago, while others place Dylan in Madison just before he headed for New York. Scaduto is in effect silent on mode of transport. He ends "A Song to Woody" chapter with Dylan in Madison. Then he begins next chapter, "Bob Dylan's Dream", with Dylan's arrival in New York. Both Sounes & Heylin write that a student Dylan met in Madison, Fred Underhill, recruited Dylan to join him & another friend, David Berger, to share driving to New York. Both Heylin & Sounes quote Underhill saying Dylan sang Woody Guthrie songs all the way to New York, which got on Berger's nerves. So I concluded that version was supported by interview testimony. I think it's true to say that in subsequent poems & songs, Dylan liked to give the impression he had hitched to New York, but he was skilled at mythologising everything about his past! Best wishes Mick gold (talk) 14:09, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank you for quick reply...appreciate your help/input...Gobledeegooke (talk) 14:15, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Roy Roberts (entrepreneur), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

• The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see what needs to be done to bring it to the next level.
• Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping Wikipedia!

Alpha Quadrant ^talk 03:18, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your input and help, and for your role in reviewing the article!Gobledeegooke (talk) 04:01, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WP:RS says: "When available, academic and peer-reviewed publications, scholarly monographs, and textbooks are usually the most reliable sources." In your Korean War edit, you're providing a narrative, not an academic history of the war. This not a reliable source when it comes down to the history of the warr. Because we have so much other, more reliable sources, that do not support the contention about American bombings, your edit has been reverted. I recommend you discuss the proposed addition in the Korean War talk page. Thank you. --S. Rich (talk) 05:30, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Thanks for informing me of this. I appreciate it.Gobledeegooke (talk) 05:56, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and declined; it is now located at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/USC Limited. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Alpha Quadrant ^talk 02:28, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Thank you for the time you took to review the submission.Gobledeegooke (talk) 03:03, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]