When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. KellyAna (talk) 04:25, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-01-06T04:25:00.000Z","author":"KellyAna","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-KellyAna-2008-01-06T04:25:00.000Z-Edit_summaries","replies":[]}}-->

Cause for a character leaving is short and sweet. "Death" "Left town" etc., it is not a detailed explanation of how the character died or why they left town i.e. for Frankie Brady you say "Left town" not "Left town because Jack came back and Jenn and Jack were reunited." The info boxes are for summaries, the article body is for details.

By the way, you should consider archiving your talk page rather than blanking it. Blanking it is frowned upon and makes people believe you choose not to care about warnings or advisories or suggestions or instructions. You should also consider replying to messages that are left so people know you aren't ignoring Wikipedia guidelines. KellyAna (talk) 04:26, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-01-06T04:26:00.000Z","author":"KellyAna","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-KellyAna-2008-01-06T04:26:00.000Z-Keep_it_short","replies":[]}}-->

Several of your recent edits have been reverted. "Lifelines" - good articles do not have lifeline lists and those added have been removed. Good articles incorporate as many "lists" into the body of the article and do not make random lists just to make them. Therefore, both lists added to Andre DiMera and John Black have been removed. As to Bless the Broken Road. The primary single for which the article is about did not "feature" Carrie Underwood. The "recorded" version was not a studio album, it was a live performance released only as a single in some markets. Again, this information can be addressed in the body of the article once obtaining information as to which award show the duet was sung, but does not belong in the infobox indicating she is a featured artist on the single. By adding her to the infobox, you incorrectly imply that she was part of the edition that had chart recognition, which she was not. Thank you for understanding. IrishLass (talk) 13:52, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-01-09T13:52:00.000Z","author":"IrishLass0128","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-IrishLass0128-2008-01-09T13:52:00.000Z-Recent_edits","replies":[],"displayName":"IrishLass"}}-->

The song charted on Billboard as "and". Thats why it says it. Charmed36 (talk) 23:39, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-02-15T23:39:00.000Z","author":"Charmed36","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Charmed36-2008-02-15T23:39:00.000Z-Break_It_Off","replies":[]}}-->

Including the featured artist in the artist category doesn't make sense. If you notice the way it is now, it says "Usher featuring Young Jeezy singles chronology" making it look like "Same Girl" was also by Usher featuring Young Jeezy. I'm not reverting you at the moment but I think you should change it back to just Usher. Think about it. —Hello, Control ^{Hello, Tony} 02:59, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-03-05T02:59:00.000Z","author":"Hello Control","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Hello_Control-2008-03-05T02:59:00.000Z-Love_in_This_Club","replies":["c-Hello_Control-2008-03-05T13:42:00.000Z-Hello_Control-2008-03-05T02:59:00.000Z"],"displayName":"Hello, Control"}}-->

OR, we could make it separate for Young Jeezy. There are ways of doing that you know. I find that it could be more effctive that way.

Hey, great; that's perfect! Now if only everyone would do that for tracks that "feature" other artists. Thanks. —Hello, Control ^{Hello, Tony} 13:42, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-03-05T13:42:00.000Z","author":"Hello Control","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Hello_Control-2008-03-05T13:42:00.000Z-Hello_Control-2008-03-05T02:59:00.000Z","replies":[],"displayName":"Hello, Control"}}-->

Yeah, but I got to figure out where Young Jeezy's fit in to the it.

Please stop adding Timbaland's name as a featured artist, as he is not credited officially as such. He co-produced the song but his name is not shown on the single cover art nor is his name credited on any charts, including in the U.S. and UK. It may show his name in the iTunes Store, but this is just one retailer and it still is not correct. Thanks - eo (talk) 19:42, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-03-27T19:42:00.000Z","author":"Ericorbit","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Ericorbit-2008-03-27T19:42:00.000Z-4_Minutes","replies":[],"displayName":"eo"}}-->

WarthogDemon has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

-WarthogDemon 03:28, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-03-28T03:28:00.000Z","author":"WarthogDemon","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-WarthogDemon-2008-03-28T03:28:00.000Z-A_Smile","replies":[],"displayName":"Warthog"}}-->

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Ching Ching worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Liempt (talk) 04:46, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-04-09T04:46:00.000Z","author":"Liempt","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Liempt-2008-04-09T04:46:00.000Z-A_Smile","replies":[]}}-->

You need to cool off with the Timbaland stuff. You are inserting his name as "featured artist" on songs that he absolutely is not credited as "featured". Aaliyah's "We Need a Resolution" is the only song of hers giving a credit to Timbaland, the others do not. They did not chart that way and to add his name is not accurate. He has produced countless songs and added his vocals to a lot of hits, but that does not automatically give him a featured artist credit. - eo (talk) 02:23, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-04-11T02:23:00.000Z","author":"Ericorbit","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Ericorbit-2008-04-11T02:23:00.000Z-Please","replies":[],"displayName":"eo"}}-->

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to The Declaration, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. DiverseMentality (Talk) (Contribs) 04:00, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-04-24T04:00:00.000Z","author":"DiverseMentality","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-DiverseMentality-2008-04-24T04:00:00.000Z-April_2008","replies":[]}}-->

Do you have the album? If so, look at the album notes for that record. Tiffany Villarreal is the female vocalist. Also, please provide a reference for Roll actually charting. I am a CHR/Rhythmic Music Director and I can assure you that record was never serviced to radio as a single. --InDeBiz1 (talk) 01:54, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-05-16T01:54:00.000Z","author":"InDeBiz1","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-InDeBiz1-2008-05-16T01:54:00.000Z-In_the_Ayer","replies":["c-InDeBiz1-2008-05-16T02:13:00.000Z-InDeBiz1-2008-05-16T01:54:00.000Z"]}}-->

The Billboard Hot 100 doesn't mean too much, when it comes to "singles" in WP infoboxes. Typically, this information refers to records that received airplay only, not the Hot 100, which draws part of its information from downloads/digital sales. Trust me on this one..  ;) I dedicate about 70 hours out of my life each week to Rhythmic/Urban radio, as the Music Director for a very well-rated Rhythmic station in the Midwest. If that record had been serviced as a single, I would know it.  :) Best regards, --InDeBiz1 (talk) 02:13, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-05-16T02:13:00.000Z","author":"InDeBiz1","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-InDeBiz1-2008-05-16T02:13:00.000Z-InDeBiz1-2008-05-16T01:54:00.000Z","replies":["c-InDeBiz1-2008-05-16T02:17:00.000Z-InDeBiz1-2008-05-16T02:13:00.000Z"]}}-->

Also, after reviewing your link in detail, a peak position of 61 does not constitute "charting," even on the Hot 100. "Charting" refers only to the top 40 positions. In regard to airplay charts, a song could get spins in mixshows or spike spins from only a little over a handful of radio stations and hit the 60s or 70s. That's not a single, that's a programmer or mixer playing an album cut. There's a difference, my friend. Best regards, --InDeBiz1 (talk) 02:17, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-05-16T02:17:00.000Z","author":"InDeBiz1","type":"comment","level":3,"id":"c-InDeBiz1-2008-05-16T02:17:00.000Z-InDeBiz1-2008-05-16T02:13:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. You were blocked for repeatedly reinserting unsourced material at A Milli after being told repeatedly that you need to provide a reliable source.⇒SWATJester ^{Son of the Defender} 19:32, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-05-18T19:32:00.000Z","author":"Swatjester","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Swatjester-2008-05-18T19:32:00.000Z-Blocked","replies":[],"displayName":"\u21d2"}}-->

Can you stop changing the artist details for this song. The song was a single which was originally released by the John Butler Trio, it was only after the he performed it with Keith Urban at the 2007 ARIA Awards was it released as a duet and even then only as a digital download single. Dan arndt (talk) 08:43, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-05-19T08:43:00.000Z","author":"Dan arndt","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Dan_arndt-2008-05-19T08:43:00.000Z-Funky_Tonight","replies":[]}}-->

Pharrell is not credited as a featured artist on this track. He is listed as producer only in the album credits and is not displayed on any chart as "Madonna featuring Pharrell". Please do not start adding unnecessary featured credits to this song article. Thanks. - eo (talk) 01:38, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-05-22T01:38:00.000Z","author":"Ericorbit","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Ericorbit-2008-05-22T01:38:00.000Z-Give_It_2_Me","replies":[],"displayName":"eo"}}-->

It was not fine last year and that's why people have been changing it to improve it. That's what wikipedia is about improving articles and not taking ownership saying "No, I'm not having it.". You did not see the information you deleted because you were just reverting it to your way. This is disruptive and is not appropriate. As I already pointed out one of the things wrong with your constant reverts is it lead to the deletion of new information but you now seem to be aware of this which is good. But you are still changing it to say "Single by Daddy Yankee featuring Fergie from the album El Cartel: The Big Boss", this is wrong. The single impacto is by daddy yankee and the remix single is with Fergie, so she is not on the single impacto so stop adding it. You may have been unaware of this, as the remix was issued to english market which you most probably a part of where as, "Impacto" was issued to the spanish market which is why I know. If you don't believe me go buy the album of download his single and see for yourself, impacto does not feature fergie. Cazique (talk) 14:07, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-05-26T14:07:00.000Z","author":"Cazique","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Cazique-2008-05-26T14:07:00.000Z-Don't_take_ownership","replies":[]}}-->

This song is a duet,look at the cover. ILikeMusicaLot (talk) 18:02, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-06-14T18:02:00.000Z","author":"ILikeMusicaLot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-ILikeMusicaLot-2008-06-14T18:02:00.000Z-4_Minutes_(Madonna_song)","replies":[]}}-->

Please stop adding incorrect "featuring" artist credits to multiple song pages, particularly "Give It 2 Me" and others. Not every vocalist or producer of every song automatically gets a featured artist credit. I and others have had conversations like this with you before and your edits are disruptive. Please stop, especially if the song cover art does not include any "featuring" names. - eo (talk) 00:26, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-06-15T00:26:00.000Z","author":"Ericorbit","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Ericorbit-2008-06-15T00:26:00.000Z-Incorrect_featured_artists","replies":[],"displayName":"eo"}}-->

• Justin Timberlake discography
• Hot 100 number-one hits of 2005 (United States)
• Hot 100 number-one hits of 2006 (United States)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - eo (talk) 12:57, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-06-21T12:57:00.000Z","author":"Ericorbit","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Ericorbit-2008-06-21T12:57:00.000Z-Disruptive_edits","replies":[],"displayName":"eo"}}-->

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to Try Again, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - eo (talk) 15:21, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-07-02T15:21:00.000Z","author":"Ericorbit","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Ericorbit-2008-07-02T15:21:00.000Z-July_2008","replies":["c-Ericorbit-2008-07-02T15:22:00.000Z-Ericorbit-2008-07-02T15:21:00.000Z"],"displayName":"eo"}}-->

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Rehab (Rihanna song), you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - eo (talk) 15:22, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-07-02T15:22:00.000Z","author":"Ericorbit","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Ericorbit-2008-07-02T15:22:00.000Z-Ericorbit-2008-07-02T15:21:00.000Z","replies":[],"displayName":"eo"}}-->

SuperPower should be listed as the 1st featured artist since he does the chorus. XxJoshuaxX (talk) 15:24, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-07-27T15:24:00.000Z","author":"XxJoshuaxX","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-XxJoshuaxX-2008-07-27T15:24:00.000Z-Lolli_Lolli_(Pop_That_Body)","replies":["c-Winger84-2008-07-30T07:11:00.000Z-XxJoshuaxX-2008-07-27T15:24:00.000Z"]}}-->

Incorrect. The featured guests are to be listed as they are listed on the promo single and industry publications, such as Mediabase, Radio and Reocrds, Billboard, etc. On all of the above, Project Pat is listed first. --Winger84 (talk) 07:11, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-07-30T07:11:00.000Z","author":"Winger84","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Winger84-2008-07-30T07:11:00.000Z-XxJoshuaxX-2008-07-27T15:24:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-11-24T13:41:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2015-11-24T13:41:00.000Z-ArbCom_elections_are_now_open!","replies":[]}}-->