User talk:Feminist/Archive 9

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Feminist. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Please note [1] that 1) this page was previously oversighted not just for nothing; 2) my "contribution" to the article consisted in one accidental revert (I misclicked) followed by an immediate self-revert. There is not a single symbol in the article written by me. Would you please remove the template. Thank you.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:19, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

• I have removed the "contributions to the article" part, but otherwise don't think the template is problematic. Many talk pages of articles of Wikipedia editors have such a template. Thanks. sst✈ 11:24, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

  I do think it is problematic, and it is me who decides. I have written to the oversight. thanks to at least removing false info.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:27, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

The article Avianca Flight 52 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Avianca Flight 52 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MPJ-DK -- MPJ-DK (talk) 12:02, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Ymblanter requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:44, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

I don't know if this was your intention - perhaps you didn't realise how negatively worded Wikipedia:Who is a low-profile individual was - but accusing Temple-Wood of being "actively seeking out media attention" in terms of WP:LPI seems rather unfair. StAnselm (talk) 06:07, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

On 16 March 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Signpost (Wikipedia), which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that The Signpost publishes stories related to the Wikipedia community, the Wikimedia Foundation, and other Wikipedia-related projects? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Signpost (Wikipedia). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:03, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

The article ICloud leaks of celebrity photos you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:ICloud leaks of celebrity photos for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FunkMonk -- FunkMonk (talk) 22:21, 16 March 2016 (UTC)