User talk:Feminist/Archive 2
License tagging for File:LOT Polish Airlines.svgThanks for uploading File:LOT Polish Airlines.svg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information. To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:06, 16 July 2015 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for July 18Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ThinkPad Yoga, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IPS. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
edit to Jen Kirkman biographyYou left me a message that I didn't support an edit to a Jen Kirkman biography. Please help me. I was only undoing an edit that was vandalism. The person who made a false edit didn't support their edit either so I thought I could just click to undo it. What should I do? If my undo of their edit gets removed then the false edit will go back and it is not a true fact.ISeemFun2 (talk) 12:25, 22 July 2015 (UTC) I see that you reverted it. If you go back through you'll see that the edit I put back in place has been there forever. The edit you put back is UNTRUE. She does not have a nephew named Ari Shaffir who has gigantism. That is a comic who hates Jen Kirkman and his fans attacked her page. Please help put back the old way the page looked, where it said she has a nephew named Buffalo Hird because that is the true fact.ISeemFun2 (talk) 12:38, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
I apologize as well. Wikipedia would not let me log in so I created a new account. I finally found out that it was the browser I was using that was keeping me from logging in. I didn't know I could get banned for not being able to log in, thank you for telling me. However, the vandals keep attacking the Jen Kirkman page so I guess I will just give up and let them have it. ISeemFun2 (talk) 14:54, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for your help. It is unregistered users trying to put the same false information in place at the request of Shaffir, and trying to add in that Jen Kirkman is older than she is and is unfunny. Just stupid things. I will look into how to apply for protection if the vandalism keeps happening. Thanks again.ISeemFun2 (talk) 15:35, 23 July 2015 (UTC) Transaero logobsd. i uploaded an svg of the new logo, just of the regular version, without the russian. may i suggest you do the same, as it's preferable to have only one version, at least when used as the main logo in an article. also, you can reduce the whitespace around it. regards --Ben Stone 18:59, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
Welcome to STiki!
Incorrectly regarded as vandalismHi, I'm Darkknight2149. I was observing the article Suicide Squad (film) when I noticed that you incorrectly regarded one of the edits of an anonymous user as vandalism. To be more specific, I'm referring to this edit: [1]. Although the user's edit was unquestionably unnecessary, it appears to be in good faith. The term "villainess" is a word used to describe a female villain.[2] [3] [4] [5] I wanted to let you know that removed the vandalism template from the user's Talk Page since this situation appears to be a mere misunderstanding. If you think that I am the one who is misunderstanding the situation, you can contact me on my talk page. Darkknight2149 (talk) 16:39, 23 July 2015 (UTC) You are invited to the ongoing RM discussion. Join in to improve consensus. --George Ho (talk) 03:23, 24 July 2015 (UTC) re: recent shogun changeThankyou sentinel for your effort and input. Its good to hear that you like Japan and your interested in Japanese shogun warriors who had their origin in Yamato If you have a chance to go to Japan. You will learn about the shogun. I changed the page to an accurate outlook on shogun. In reality Japanese are all the race and dna besides the original pit dwelling orientals with tattoos who were savages in N, NO, O y DNA. The developing group, from evidences was from a tribe of israel that was part esau. Regaurdless the same people go back to Yamato in Shinto and kami which they built and there was two yamatos according to the Japanese one was am extention in Kyushu. Which is why the Japanese have two names meaning Yamato. In the Japanese accounts which aren't entirely accurate state that steel sam-urai sword smelting was done in yamato B.C. If you really follow the history yemishi had there origins in Yamato. Meaning they are they are the same people as Yamato Japanese and they speak the same language and have the same DNA. Some went north and in reality the yemishi inhabited the other areas of Honshu too besides north east Honshu after Kyushu. If the yemishi in Honshu wanted to break away from the yemishi in Yamato then it was up to him when that happened he stopped working for Yamato and wars between shoguns broke out in Japan which was in civil wars in the race and wars. If the yemishi weren't from Yamato they wouldn't be in Shinto and kami in Honshu and other places they are found today but they are so that means that tge Japanese account of the yemishi is correct and they are the same but they broke away to try and claim parts of Honshu. A shogun is a general, now when yemishi in Yamato fought against yemishi in Honshu who were leaving it, like anytime in the same Japan wars and race there were two generals or sam-urai shoguns and they had horns on their helmets. Besides that they also had sam-urai soldiers. Those things were all up in the same wars and race and the reality is the former pages depiction of a shogun is very naive, which is expected, I know, from foreign people to; japans middle eastern Israel and the mysterious warrior that appears and originates in Japan all the way in the far east. Chinese script was taught to Japanese when bodiesia the indian buddist missionary went to Japan late. It was a single ship in the harbor as usual if anything was brought to Japan, so the Japanese armies didn't line up on the beach but received bodesia with open arms. He introduced not only Chinese script but also kanji. He also introduced some words from india. When he arrived in Japan there was needed effort to spread the buddah in religious ministry. Shinto and kami with soldier sam-urai saints and the origin of the shogun sam-urai was already set up b.c. What happened like any other religion was they had Japanese families that were closest to bodesia and they became his follows these are what are called establishing families. The two Chinese that Brought bodies is to Japan didn't remain in Japan its known that they went to china and bodesia spent his whole life in Japan. So these establishing families also spread Chinese scripts and Asian staple foods like rice to name one, besides buddah which they spread. China never was associated with Japan in the Japanese account, which was compiled late from many sources, but they still never showed the fact that Japan never loved china. That was because the people that compiled the history were linked to establishing families that were closer to bodesia which is why they wrote in in traditional Chinese which was introduced by him along with kanji and buddah ect. Speedy deletion nomination of Source article name![]()
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Bazj (talk) 09:23, 27 July 2015 (UTC) I tagged this as a test. I could just as easily have tagged it as vandalism. What were you trying to do? Why? Bazj (talk) 09:24, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
Reply: Recent edit to The Untouchables (film)Dear Mr. Sovereign Sentinel, Actually I am quite new on editing, I'm not sure is this the place where you wanted me to post my reply, so please let me know if you receive my message. Here is the link from where I made those minor changes of the articles. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0094226/trivia Thank you for your help. Nafeez Sarwar. Sovereign Sentinel wrote: Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, The Untouchables (film), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! sovereign°sentinel (contribs) 11:04, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Gamergate controversyHi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Gamergate controversy you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Your GA nomination of Gamergate controversyThe article Gamergate controversy you nominated as a good article has failed Your GA nomination of Depression QuestHi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Depression Quest you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Your GA nomination of Depression QuestThe article Depression Quest you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold McCordI had to revert your recent edit per WP:BLP. Perhaps I missed something, but I saw no source to support those claims. -- James26 (talk) 03:09, 4 August 2015 (UTC) My talk pageWhy did do undo my blanking of my talk page? I am allowed to blank messages on my talk page as long as I have read and acknowledge them. 97.85.113.113 (talk) 18:40, 4 August 2015 (UTC) ARTICLE TITLE listed at Redirects for discussion![]() An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ARTICLE TITLE. Since you had some involvement with the ARTICLE TITLE redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - TheChampionMan1234 09:24, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
|