Hello, Donaldrkiddjr, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! – XLinkBot (talk) 19:34, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Wakesurfing has been reverted. Your edit here to Wakesurfing was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s8OKYi39tl4) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 19:34, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
The comment the reviewer left was:
This draft has no properly formed references. It is also very badly formatted.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Donaldrkiddjr/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
Hello! Donaldrkiddjr,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 20:46, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Donald. Me again. Per my comments at Gestrid's talk page this morning [1], I have accepted the revised draft and moved it into article space. You will find it at Ashley Kidd. I've also taken care of the "connected contributor" declaration via a template at Talk:Ashley Kidd. The article is short, but accurate. If you have any additions in light of further sources, I strongly recommend that rather than making them yourself, you make a request at Talk:Ashley Kidd for other editors to evaluate and implement if appropriate. If you have any questions or need any help, just give me a shout on my talk page, although I will be away from August 2–31 with fairly limited internet access. Voceditenore (talk) 08:53, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I've added both the article page and talk page (Talk pages are used to discuss improvement to their respective articles.) to my watchlist, so I'll know if you edit or request an edit to the article. Note that it's not forbidden for you to edit the article, but it's recommended that you don't because of your personal connection to Ashley. However, in my eyes, it would be ok for you to edit the article as long as the edits you made were unbiased.
I've also added the {{photo requested}} template to the talk page. Just click "Upload" to be taken to our sister site's (aka Wikimedia Commons') upload wizard to upload the photo. After you've uploaded the photo, if you're unsure how to put the photo in the article, just ask for help on the talk page and I or someone else will be able to put it in the article.
