User talk:Cremastra/Archive 3

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Cremastra. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

	10,000 Edit Barnstar
	That makes two of us who used their 10,000th edit milestone on an impromptu action. :D –Vipz (talk) 21:48, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Valve on a "Economy, trade, and companies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 14:30, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Environmental Working Group on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:30, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

Hello Cremastra,

Backlog update: At the time of this message, there are 11,300 articles and 15,600 redirects awaiting review. This is the highest backlog in a long time. Please help out by doing additional reviews!

October backlog elimination drive: A one-month backlog drive for October will start in one week! Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Articles will earn 4x as many points compared to redirects. You can sign up here.

PageTriage code upgrades: Upgrades to the PageTriage code, initiated by the NPP open letter in 2022 and actioned by the WMF Moderator Tools Team in 2023, are ongoing. More information can be found here. As part of this work, the Special:NewPagesFeed now has a new version in beta! The update leaves the NewPagesFeed appearance and function mostly identical to the old one, but updates the underlying code, making it easier to maintain and helping make sure the extension is not decommissioned due to maintenance issues in the future. You can try out the new Special:NewPagesFeed here - it will replace the current version soon.

Notability tip: Professors can meet WP:PROF #1 by having their academic papers be widely cited by their peers. When reviewing professor articles, it is a good idea to find their Google Scholar or Scopus profile and take a look at their h-index and number of citations. As a very rough rule of thumb, for most fields, articles on people with a h-index of twenty or more, a first-authored paper with more than a thousand citations, or multiple papers each with more than a hundred citations are likely to be kept at AfD.

Reviewing tip: If you would like like a second opinion on your reviews or simply want another new page reviewer by your side when patrolling, we recommend pair reviewing! This is where two reviewers use Discord voice chat and screen sharing to communicate with each other while reviewing the same article simultaneously. This is a great way to learn and transfer knowledge.

Reminders:

• You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
• Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
• To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

I see you relisted Slavic Native Faith's identity and political philosophy, if you haven’t already done so can you do the same for Slavic Native Faith's theology and cosmology, and Slavic Native Faith's calendars and holidays. All three are move requests that only me and the page creator have really participated in Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (talk to the cutest Wikipedian) 04:09, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

 Done, thanks. Edward-Woodrow • talk 11:54, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

Hey Edward-Woodrow, There seems to be a copyvio on the career section of Draft:Musa Ssekaana from [1] Earwig's shows 68.9% violation [2]. Can you please add a tag or comment on it? Or should I leave a note on it's talk page? Jeraxmoira (talk) 18:12, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

Jeraxmoira, thanks a lot for seeing that. I didn't even think checking the draft for copyvios. It's not a 100% match, but way to close for comfort. I've blanked the section and tagged the article with {{copyvio-revdel}}, so an administrator will hopefully come along soon and delete the preceding revisions. Thanks, Edward-Woodrow • talk 19:58, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

No problem. Also, I wanted to ask if it's okay to edit other's drafts even if it doesn't have the 'open to editing' tag? Jeraxmoira (talk) 05:57, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

Generally, yes. WP:DRAFT says that anyone, including users who are not logged in, may create and edit drafts. Of course, people might get annoyed if you come in and rewrite a draft that they've been working on alone, but generally it's perfectly alright to amble in and make some fixes. My guess is that editing other editors' userspace drafts might be considered poor form, though. Edward-Woodrow • talk 12:29, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

Got it, Thanks <3 Jeraxmoira (talk) 08:14, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

{{Old prod|nom=Edward-Woodrow|nomdate=2023-09-09}}

Should I remove this from Beyblade X talk page? VizDsouz (talk) 17:28, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

@VizDsouz: No. What reason would you have for removing it? Edward-Woodrow • talk 19:52, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

Just simply asking. VizDsouz (talk) 02:15, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Okay. No, it shouldn't be removed. It's a useful way of telling that the article has been PRODed in the past, without having to dig through page history. It is thus ineligible to be PRODed again. Thanks, Edward-Woodrow • talk 11:51, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Ok thanks VizDsouz (talk) 12:17, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Hello Edward-Woodrow, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Chase Shipman, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Is a plausible, useful redirect or is not a redirect at all. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 12:33, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Hello. Are you going to add all nickname redirects to the top of the page? Why add only one? There's no need to add nicknames as hatnotes... SLBedit (talk) 22:12, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

@SLBedit: I thought it was advisable as "O Gloriosa" seemed the most ambiguous. You can remove it if you want, but I figured it couldn't hurt, especially since there are several titles at Gloriosa (disambiguation) with "O Gloriosa". 22:13, 29 September 2023 (UTC) Edward-Woodrow • talk 22:13, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

You mean "O Glorioso" ("A Gloriosa" is the feminine version). Grammatical gender. SLBedit (talk) 22:18, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

Right, yes of course, my bad. The hatnote links to the correct (masculine) version, though, so no harm done. Edward-Woodrow • talk 22:19, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

I know your move proposal for Georgia was in good faith, but in the future, please don't make perennial proposals like that, at least if you don't have new and convincing arguments. It just serves to annoy the community. --Rockstone^{Send me a message!} 05:01, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Recognition of same-sex unions in India on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 11:30, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Hi again, Edward-Woodrow. A few comments about some RMs:

• Talk:Operation Desert (German fuel project)#Requested move 29 August 2023 — To explain your technical request (as I should have done in a reply before carrying out the request), the reason you couldn't move the page yourself was that the new title was a redirect to a different page (not the page being moved to the redirect), so the pagemover flag "delete-redirect" would be needed to overwrite that redirect. In general, any chain of moves B → C and A → B requires a technical request/pagemover (see WP:Page mover#Moves involving primary topics).
• Talk:Tyla (South African singer)#Requested move 12 September 2023 — The same situation apparently happened here that day. Only the second move was made, even though your closure would indicate that there was a consensus for both moves (though one of the three participants disagreed with that). I'll move that page – unless the closure needs to be clarified.
• Talk:Georgia (country)#Requested move 29 September 2023 — WP:RMCI's early closure instructions say to only close an RM as "withdrawn" when nobody else has supported the move. However, I think that closure would be okay expressed instead as a WP:BOLD WP:INVOLVED WP:SNOW closure (with bold signaling that others can revert the involved closure if they disagree).

SilverLocust 💬 22:27, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for the information. I'll bear these points in mind in the future. Edward-Woodrow • talk 14:53, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

I don't have time now to work out what has happened or to fix it, but the relisting notice for Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 8#Dangerous Girl contains notice of a previous discussion for an unrelated set of redirects (Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 26#NATO occupied FR Yugoslavia). Thryduulf (talk) 15:40, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

Yikes; I'll look into it. Edward-Woodrow • talk 16:52, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

 Fixed Edward-Woodrow • talk 16:55, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

		The Redirect Barnstar
		Thank you for all your assistance at RfD! I've been seeing you consistently over the last month or so, and from my eyes you've done good work during that time, in nominating RfD candidates and performing relists and closes as needed. I appreciate your passion, so thanks for your help! Utopes (talk / cont) 14:52, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

Thank-you very much! Edward-Woodrow • talk 14:52, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

As you've probably noticed, I reverted a batch of WP:BLARs you did on Polish places. We give editors a lot of latitude with BLAR, but I think there's so little to say about it is really pushing it as a rationale, since it directly contradicts WP:NPLACE, WP:NODEADLINE and WP:STUB. I guess this is related to the VPI thread you made and quickly (and if, I may say, wisely) withdrew. Geographic stubs are a hot topic at the moment and if you're going to wade into those depths, I think it's important you're aware that not everyone may share your assumptions. For example, many editors, myself include, would disagree that an article with only the name, the coordinates, and a bit of database-style information on a place is not a useful or viable stub.

I've also just noticed that when I granted you NPR I said it was for a month but didn't actually click that button. I guess we'll say it's permanent now, then! – Joe (talk) 15:25, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:31, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Outline of reptiles. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Edward-Woodrow • talk 00:22, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

It's a navigation page. It shouldn't have been moved to draft space. See Wikipedia:Outlines.    — The Transhumanist   02:21, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

It's also clearly incomplete. You can work on it draftspace. Furthermore, where does it say in WP:Outline that such articles are somehow exempt from verifiability? Being a type of list article on Wikipedia, outlines include Manual of Style list features such as article leads, [...] annotations, reference citations, categories, page footers, and specialized end sections (See also, References, and External links). (emphasis mine) Edward-Woodrow • talk 11:49, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

I'm on your side. I want a quality encyclopedia as much as you do. I'm totally open to criticism of the page. It's just that it's unclear what it is that you want cited, as there isn't much prose to speak of on there.

Since this is a topics list, comprised almost entirely of links to articles corresponding to the topics, the reason for inclusion of each link is easily verified by clicking on the link. Any link not serving its navigation function would immediately be discovered upon doing so.

Because of this, links in outlines are rarely challenged nor are they likely to be challenged, which satisfies the key tenet of the verifiability policy. This requirement is included in the second paragraph of the policy.

Note, that in other navigation structures, such as navigation footers, navigation sidebars, see also sections, and categories, citations are not the norm, because verification of includability is achieved by simply clicking on the links. The same thing applies to the linked topics in outlines.

If you think of links in a topic tree as headings, with the body of each of these headings in the article or list linked to, the navigation function of outlines begins to make sense.

As for completeness, keep in mind that the entirety of Wikipedia is incomplete, and that completeness is not a criteria for being in article space, otherwise we would not have stubs. I slapped a {{construction}} tag on it until I was done, and somebody else came along and reviewed it.

The list links either directly to the articles on Wikipedia about reptiles, or to lists with those articles listed. It is now an integrated part of the list navigation system, tying together existing link resources: lists containing reptilian links, and reptile-related articles not included on those lists. As I come across new links and lists that pertain, I'll be sure to add those too.

The outline is now beyond stub status, which makes it subject to Wikipedia's deletion policies. If you believe there are serious problems with the outline, feel free to tag it for AfD. Though there is no need, because, if you have any further concerns about the outline, I'll be happy to address them, via editing and discussion. If you spot any dubious parent-offspring relationships in the hierarchy of the outline, please let me know, and I'll fix them straight away, including with citations, if necessary.

Always open to cooperation, sincerely,    — The Transhumanist   22:40, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for your open attitude. It's always nicer to discuss things with other editors when they're as polite as you.

I made an error of judgement in my draftification. It looked as if it was a work in progress unfit for mainspace: empty sections, dangling sentences, and no sources to be found. I draftified it to give the creator (you) time to work on it outside of public view. I did not check the policies on Wikipedia outlines.

My apologies.

Happy editing, Edward-Woodrow • talk 00:45, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Edward-Woodrow,

Before draftifying an article, it's wise to check out the experience level of the article creator. If they have been active on the project for many years, they probably are in the process of creating and referencing an article. Draftifying works best when you are moving articles mistakenly placed in main space by new editors who are less experienced. Experienced content creators often work directly in main space, bypassing Draft space and so their articles might seem unfinished if you come across them. But they generally know what they are doing. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:32, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

Edward, thank you, and no worries.    — The Transhumanist   04:39, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

Hello Edward-Woodrow -- I've deprodded a series of prods from you on islands; my reading of WP:GEONATURAL "If a Wikipedia article cannot be developed using known sources, information on the feature can instead be included in a more general article on local geography. For example, a river island with no information available except name and location should probably be described in an article on the river." is that there is no problem with having the material covered in a subtopic article, with a redirect from the minor feature title. Regards, Espresso Addict (talk) 03:57, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

This makes sense, but the problem is where to merge to? Most of these islands are so insignificant, any detailled mention of them in a higher-level article would seem to give undue weight. Besides, detailled mentions are hard to find, given that the stubs under discussion are a) extremely short and b) unlikely to be expanded much.

Take Brazier Rock. I suppose it could be merged into Auckland Region#Geography, but that would seem weird and undue. We could add it to List of islands of New Zealand, I guess. Edward-Woodrow • talk 12:12, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

Hi! It's pretty close to the target date, but I've fixed enough bare URLs per the Reward Board request. – 02:03, 14 October 2023 (UTC) Reidgreg (talk · contribs)

I'm surprised you are not a user of this. It's one of the top power tools on Wikipedia.    — The Transhumanist   05:49, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

Honestly, I've had a few too many experiences where I mess up with a semi-automated tool with mildly disasterous consequences. I wouldn't feel comfortable using something like AWB (yet, at least) Edward-Woodrow • talk 12:55, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

Understood. With your reservations in mind, you might be interested to know that while most users apply AWB to make edits for them, AWB has some powerful non-invasive features that are useful without having it edit anything:

1. List maker - make lists from a wide range of Wikipedia's page types, including special pages
2. List compare - applies set theory to 2 lists, so that you can get the items on just one list or the other, the items that appear on both lists, or all the items on both lists without duplicates
3. List alphabetizer - all lists that it makes for you are alphabetized, unless you change the settings.
4. Database scanner - my favorite feature. Allows regex searches of the entirety of site without choking. Very useful, when you want to find every single occurrence of a phrase, or absolutely everything on a particular topic. The remaining items below require registration to be activated...
5. The entire app is a very sophisticated search engine, with much greater control over output than the search engine on Wikipedia. It accepts as many search queries as you want at the same time, applied in a single search, including what to exclude, so you can filter searches down as much as you need to. You can use it to find every page that meets your criteria and show them to you one at a time. It'll automatically skip those that don't match.
6. The ability to do dry runs. You can see how a job will be implemented, without saving anything, by using the "Skip" button for each page.
7. The app includes a diff display for viewing changes, and an editor window to see what the article's modified source looks like. So you can inspect the changes from a job without saving anything.
8. Auto page loader for manual editing - if you have a list of pages you want to edit, you can have this program load pages without it making any changes to them, making them available one-at-a-time for you to edit personally. When you are done editing one page, it automatically loads the next page for you.

The first four features listed above, and some others not on this list, can be used without registering. That's right, you can explore the tool without signing up. This is its offline mode, which has zero chance of changing anything. I highly recommend that you download it and take a look.

The tool itself is fascinating, and is worth exploring even if you don't edit any pages with it.

You might consider applying for approval now, so that you have all the non-invasive features available, and so that you are already cleared if and when you decide to make the leap and have it edit for you.

I hope you find this post interesting if not useful. ;)

Sincerely,    — The Transhumanist   22:14, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

Well, I have installed WP:JWB, which has similarities. Thanks for the info. Edward-Woodrow • talk 12:32, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

JWB is nice, because it is platform independent, and can therefore work on Linux systems and in just about any browser. However, for Windows users, AWB is by far the most powerful of the two, with many tools that JWB lacks. For these reasons, I use both!    — The Transhumanist   12:59, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

This is a browser add-on (for firefox, chrome) that I use a lot. Very useful for handling lots of Wikipedia pages. I thought you might like to know about it.    — The Transhumanist   05:54, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

I'm a bit perplexed by your close of Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2023 October 14#INTDABLINK of redirects from incomplete disambiguation. For one, there was an outstanding delete !vote besides the nominator, so I don't see this as a WP:SNOW situation. Narky Blert's speedy keep was for the evaluation of incoming links, which was subsequently completed. I do agree with Bkonrad that But on the other hand, what is there to evaluate? and agree that this would be an all or nothing delete/keep outcome. Breaking up into smaller chunks would draw that out too long. I would like to lodge a delete !vote, but I was never given that opportunity due to the early closure. Finally, the rationale for your closure is flawed. With tools like WP:AWB and WP:DBATCH (if closure is delete), it is actually very simple to implement a mass closure like this. I strongly urge you to back out of your closure and leave it open for further discussion. Thanks, -- Tavix ^(talk) 18:43, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

@Tavix I'm sorry, but I have to very strongly disagree here. There are far too many redirects here to reasonably evaluate in one go and this reopening is just wasting everybody's time. I'm only sorry that I didn't see your message here before Edward reopened the discussion. If the close had been "keep" on the merits that would be a different matter, but this was a procedural keep. Thryduulf (talk) 00:12, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

Hold on, I didn't reopen the discussion, NmWTfs85lXusaybq did, saying on their talk page, the early close is controversial. I split the nomination into groups and reopened the discussion. And don't close it again without further consensus. Edward-Woodrow • talk 00:14, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

On the contrary, splitting this up into several discussions is what will waste everyone's time. This is the type of redirect where one will 'keep all' or 'delete all', I do not see a middle ground. If you want to make an argument for a middle ground, I'm interested in hearing it (although at the RfD is probably the better venue for that). -- Tavix ^(talk) 00:18, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

Indeed. Could we move this discussion to either RfD or WT:RFD, as opposed to my talk page? Edward-Woodrow • talk 00:28, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

Hi, I pinged you about not adding multiple parent categories at Category:Attacks in France in the 1990s. On closer inspection, I see that you did create the page with two parent categories, but Category:Attacks in Europe in the 1990s did not exist, so Bearcat removed that one. It would have been better if either of you had shortened it to e.g. Category:Attacks in the 1990s which did exist. Anyway, I've created and populated that missing parent now, and added a third parent. – Fayenatic London 21:44, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

Thanks. Edward-Woodrow • talk 23:16, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Edward-Woodrow,

Categories can't be deleted through CSD until they have been emptied so I have removed the CSD tag from this one. If you are going to close CFD discussions, you need to handle the articles/pags in the category being discussed or set it up so that User:JJMC89 bot III handles the recategorization of articles. If you have questions about this, I recommend you ask Marcocapelle who is very experienced in CFDs and emptying categories that are designated to be deleted. CFDs can be very complicated and even a lot of administrators avoid closing them so please make sure all of the "Ts" are crossed and "Is" are dotted. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:42, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

Okay, thanks. Edward-Woodrow • talk 12:44, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

@Liz: I've emptied the category; should I tag it with {{db-xfd}} again, or do something else? Edward-Woodrow • talk 12:46, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

Really, Marcocapelle is the expert here and can help you out with the details. But typically, after categories have been emptied (either by requesting that JJMC89 bot III handle this duty or the closer handling it) , I believe they are tagged CSD G6 with a link to the CFD discussion. But Marco would know, he seems to have the system down flawlessly and has always been helpful when I've asked him questions about CFD. Right now, I deleted this category as it showed up on the the Empty Categories list. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:13, 22 October 2023 (UTC)

Alright, thanks. Edward-Woodrow • talk 13:15, 22 October 2023 (UTC)

@Marcocapelle:? Edward-Woodrow • talk 14:37, 22 October 2023 (UTC)

• Like Liz said, after emptying the category you should tag the category page with e.g. {{db-xfd|votepage=Log/2023_October_12}} if October 12 is the CfD page where the discussion can be found. Alternatively, you do not need to empty the category but you can simply list it at Wikipedia_talk:Categories_for_discussion/Working under NAC requests. Marcocapelle (talk) 14:58, 22 October 2023 (UTC)

  Right-ho, thanks. Edward-Woodrow • talk 15:01, 22 October 2023 (UTC)

There is a new update for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it!

In this issue, we discuss our decision of rewriting the evaluator encapsulation service, in order to make it run on WebAssembly.

Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check our archive!

Enjoy the reading! -- User:Sannita (WMF) (talk) 13:31, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

Hello Edward-Woodrow:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 2 months outstanding reviews from the current 4+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 November 2023 through 30 November 2023.

You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.

There is a backlog of over 2200 pages, so start reviewing drafts. We're looking forward to your help! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:24, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

Hey there. Congrats on being on the backlog drive leaderboard. I really appreciate you helping out at NPP. If you want to hang out with other NPPs, consider joining us on the NPP Discord. Discord is live text chat software that can be really fun. If not no worries. Thanks and see you around :) –Novem Linguae (talk) 15:04, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for the offer, but no thanks. Edward-Woodrow • talk 22:28, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

		Special Edition New Page Patroller's Barnstar
		This award is given to Edward-Woodrow for collecting more than 200 points during the October 2023 NPP backlog drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to the drive! Hey man im josh (talk) 01:44, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

Thank you! Edward-Woodrow • talk 12:12, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

You are way too involved in Emoji redirects to be making an administrative action regarding them. Please revert your relists. -- Tavix ^(talk) 20:31, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

 Done, but in both cases, there was no change since the previous relist, so I don't particularly see the problem. It's as much of an administrative action as shuffling a few papers around. Edward-Woodrow • talk 20:34, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

You invoked WP:INVOLVED, which is specifically regarding administrative actions, which is why I used that language. If there is no change since a previous relist, that is a good hint that it is time for closure, so leave it for someone who is uninvolved to do that. -- Tavix ^(talk) 20:37, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

Your feedback is requested at Talk:David Lammy on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 01:30, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

There is a new update for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it!

In this issue, we discuss our latest technical improvements on Wikifunctions.

Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check our archive!

Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next Volunteers' Corner will be held on November 13, at 18:30 UTC (link to the meeting).

Enjoy the reading! -- User:Sannita (WMF) (talk) 12:16, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

thanks Edward-Woodrow

Appreciate your efforts A resubmission has been done addressing your points, I hope Virgobeach. PS well done on the October award Virgobeach (talk) 01:19, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Hello Edward-Woodrow

I tried what you said - rejected again!

Perhaps I found a hard second reviewer but how do I progress this from here after SunDawn's comments.

There seem plenty of many more trivial pages on wiki (I like to hit the random page button a few time every day...)

Thanks for your advice

Virgobeach Virgobeach (talk) 12:28, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

NB: am not asking you to RE-review - only further advice on how to progress :) Virgobeach (talk) 12:35, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Well Ca, the last reviewer said that There is not much to say about the group from the provided sources. They also commented that I don't see why this can't be merged to Kakadu National Park instead and maybe you can create a more general spin-off article about just dispute between the mining lobby and enviromentalists in Kakadu National Park, which seems notable to me. I'd follow their advice, given the topic does not appear to be notable. Any other suggestions, Ca? Edward-Woodrow (talk) 13:10, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

Here is a page that appeared in my homepage as a suggestion i edit it using my new skills. Champy's Famous Fried Chicken. I am not suggesting we should delete it, but it seems much less well referenced and very highly promotional compared with Draft:Kakadu Action Group

You further insights are welcomed

Virgobeach (talk) 01:30, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

Well, you did manage to find an article already tagged with those problems. Not everything goes through AfC, and, to but it bluntly, there are a lot of crappy articles out there. See WP:OTHERSTUFF. Edward-Woodrow (talk) 13:43, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

OK, enjoy your break when you Do take it! Virgobeach (talk) 04:29, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

Hello, this is Jayden B Darby. I am a very new editor, lol. Just wanted to let you know someone has already downsized our beloved village pump and moved it down the page. JaydenBDarby (talk) 03:45, 8 November 2023 (UTC) JaydenBDarby (talk) 03:45, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

• 165.156.39.23 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Digital Imaging and Communication for Nondestructive Evaluation (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Thank you for your review of the draft, Digital Imaging and Communication for Nondestructive Evaluation. The reason for not accepting the article was lack of reliable sources. In order to correct the complaint, can you be more specific on which source you believe to not be reliable, or which snippet of text is not adequately cited? Thank you.

165.156.39.23 (talk) 14:00, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

It's a bit more than a "snippet". I'm looking at the entire "Inheritance of DICONDE Standards" section, besides parts of "DICONDE and DICOM" and "Connectathons". Also, if you could put the references after punctuation, that would be great (like this.^[1] not like this^[1].) See MOS:CITEPUNCT. Edward-Woodrow (talk) 20:49, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

I've been giving out quite a bit of advice lately on user talk pages about the tools I'm familiar with. So much so, that I realized there was enough content to develop a page with it.

So, in case you are interested, I've been revamping the Optimized tool set.

It includes some of the most powerful tools currently available, and as I have time, I'll try to include the rest.

You might find something useful on there.

Sincerely,    — The Transhumanist   06:17, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

Hi - regarding this series of edits. First, the talk page of a blocked sock whp has no business editing here is not a great place to have a discussion about the merits or otherwise of rolling back their edits. If you are going to harangue hard-working administrators about clean up they've done, you should do it on their own talk pages.

Second, admins who work SPI, and who come across the sock of an account that is known to have had multiple issues in the past with a particular type of editing, are faced with a choice. Do we carefully review every one of their contributions (which in this case number in the thousands), weighing whether or not to revert? That would as always be the ideal option, but it would take hours of time, which would obviously result in other cases not being attended to. (Have you looked at the backlog at SPI recently?) The choice that many of us take, for reasons of expediency as well as to discourage continued socking, is to simply revert them all. They should not have been editing, those categorisations should not have been made - we put things back the way they were before they created their sock. This is discussed in more detail at WP:BANREVERT. Note the language in the first paragraph there: changes that are obviously helpful... ...can be allowed to stand, not should be allowed to stand. When in doubt (and they are most certainly in doubt for anything the user in question has done), they should be reverted.

Now, if you want to spend the time it would take to review their contributions fully, and are willing to stand by them yourself as improvements to the project, you are welcome to reinstate any of them that you see fit. That would take exactly the same amount of time as the checks that you seem to think Bbb23 should have carried out. I for one believe that that would be a better use of your time than insulting people with insulting, snide, sarcastic messages. Girth Summit _(blether) 08:13, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

To editors Girth Summit and Bbb23: Apparantly, I never responded to this at the time. So, coming very late indeed: sorry about this foolish comment of mine. Cremastra (u — c) 16:40, 10 November 2024 (UTC)

Cremastra: no worries. You actually struck through the comment in this diff, which I took as an apology of sorts at the time, so I considered this matter closed. Best wishes, Girth Summit _(blether) 16:49, 10 November 2024 (UTC)

There is a new update for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it!

In this issue, we finally announce that Wikifunctions is on general availability, and that functions can be run also by non-logged in users!

Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check our archive!

Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next Volunteers' Corner will be held on November 13, at 18:30 UTC (link to the meeting).

Enjoy the reading! -- User:Sannita (WMF) (talk) 09:50, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Boops boops on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 16:31, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

centipedes

Thank you for quality articles about centipedes, such as Scolopendra dehaani and Craterostigmus tasmanianus, for Myzobdella lugubris and Nalepella, for dealing with articles for creation and redirects for discussion, for welcoming new users, for "Be moderate, and reasonable." - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

You are recipient no. 2893 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:13, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

@Gerda Arendt: Oh, goodness... thank-you! Edward-Woodrow (talk) 20:57, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

You are welcome. Would you perhaps like to join WP:QAI? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:07, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

I would be glad to. Cremastra (talk) 22:31, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

December: story · music · places

welcome! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:38, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

My story today is about Michael Robinson, - it's an honour to have known him. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:48, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

Pics up to 3 December, with my shadow in one of them, and a story about Beethoven in memory of his birth. When the arb who wrote the infoboxes case installed the community consensus - in 2015! - I hoped these infobox wars were over, really. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:42, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for what you do and stand for! I wish you a good festive season and a peaceful New Year! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:46, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

And the same to you! Cremastra (talk) 20:43, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

Thank you! - Today, I have a special story to tell, of the works of a musician born 300 years ago. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:36, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

There is a new update for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it!

In this issue, we discuss which new types of functions should we support and the latest changes to the software.

Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check our archive!

Enjoy the reading! -- User:Sannita (WMF) (talk) 15:10, 18 November 2023 (UTC)

On 20 November 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Balkan terrapin, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that hatchling Balkan terrapins are only 3 to 4 centimetres (1.2 to 1.6 in) in length, while adults (example pictured) can grow as long as 25 cm (9.8 in)? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Balkan terrapin. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Balkan terrapin), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:01, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

That edit you undid as "unexplained" is actually easily explanable: inter-sectarian harassment. Unfortunately, the IPv6 pool is large and highly dynamic. I'm going to semi-protect the page for a month, but it surely won't stop [religion or sect 1] from trying to use WP to heap insults on [religion or sect 2]. DMacks (talk) 23:59, 25 November 2023 (UTC)

@Edward-Woodrow:, I am here to clarify on one thing. I am not the creator of the article Kim Myung-soo (admiral). It was originally created by User:Sqm00701. I dun understand how i suddenly became the creator. I tend to edit and create articles of major crimes (mostly singaporean) and k-pop stuff. might wanna need help to clear my name NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 15:50, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

@NelsonLee20042020: Sorry if you got a notification for the BLPPROD; because of your draftification, you're marked as the technical creator of the page (because Sqm00701 rewrote the article after you moved it), so Twinkle notified you. Edward-Woodrow (talk) 15:54, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

Well for now, i have not received any notification but I am shocked to see my XTools listing the article inside my list of articles created, which really gave me a nasty fright, because I want to clear this misunderstanding the system have on me. But yeah thanks for the clarification. --NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 15:57, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

And by the way, @Edward-Woodrow:, how will i remove this from the list and let the system know i am not the creator? This is certainly a lesson needed to be learnt for Sqm00701 but it unnecessarily and for no reason left an undesirable mark on my record so far NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 15:59, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

I don't think you can, but it's not like its a blemish on your record or something. If someone is really looking your contribs that closely, then they'll notice you didn't write the article, and no-one scrutinizes other people's XTools like that. Besides, if the article is deleted, I think it will be removed. Edward-Woodrow (talk) 16:01, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

Understand. I have checked further and I found out his content in the article space and draftspace are technically the same, meaning he had copy paste into the page before he made any major changes needed to the article. So I had restored the redirect to the draft version and already informed him to edit it before he can move it from draftspace NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 16:07, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for the clarification by the way. But hope you would not take offence at me taking matters in my hand. I am trying to do what I believe to be in good faith for the guy; he does have a sort of passion in making content in wikipedia though, he just require some working on. NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 16:09, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Palestinian political violence on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 11:31, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

There is a new update for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it!

In this issue, we present two new members of the team, we discuss the latest changes in software, and we announce that Functioneer right will be now assigned by the community.

Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check our archive!

Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next Volunteers' Corner will be held on December 4, at 18:30 UTC (link to the meeting).

Enjoy the reading! -- User:Sannita (WMF) (talk) 12:01, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

Hi Edward :) I'm looking for people to interview here. Feel free to pass if you're not interested. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 10:10, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

 Done. Thanks for the offer, Clovermoss. :) Edward-Woodrow (talk) 13:45, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

You're welcome and thank you for participating! By the way, that is the WikiEd I was referring to. I only really learned of its existence recently myself. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 13:52, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

		The Portal Barnstar
		The Portal Barnstar is awarded to Wikipedians who have made significant contributions to topic portals. GREAT JOB AT Portal:Costa Rica Moxy- 22:34, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

Oh, goodness, thank you. Edward-Woodrow (talk) 02:17, 3 December 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Edward. I saw your message to me suggesting salting some titles repeatedly created by a sockpuppeteer. However, my experience is that it is actually unhelpful to salt titles in this situation. Since the person in question has created several pages several times, coming back with new sockpuppets after each one is blocked, they are almost certainly going to come back and do the same again, and the only effect of salting would be to force them to find new titles for the pages. We can easily watchlist the old titles, but we can't watchlist every conceivable new title they may possibly think up, so salting stands to make it harder to catch them next time. I have seen that happen quite often over the years: a persistent sockpuppeteer has been repeatedly caught fairly soon, until some administrator decides to salt titles, and then they create sockpuppets which manage to stay undetected for long periods. Also, you can't put the genie back in the bottle: once they realise that making up new titles each time helps them to evade scrutiny, they carry on doing that even if no more salting takes place, so just salting even one title can be very counterproductive. JBW (talk) 12:07, 3 December 2023 (UTC)

Okay, that makes sense. Thank-you. Edward-Woodrow (talk) 15:02, 3 December 2023 (UTC)

Boxing at the 2023 Pacific Games - Why are you deleting my work? I gave you a citations! Zboris (talk) 03:09, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

Maybe there's a display issue. I don't see any citations appearing in this revision. Cremastra (talk) 21:06, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

Hi!

Noticed you changed your username from Edward-Woodrow. May I ask why? Just curious. No hate intended.

Anyways, have a good day, Cremastra :) QuickQuokka ^{[⁠talk • contribs]} 08:32, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

No worries. I changed it because "Edward-Woodrow" wasn't obviously a pseudonym, so I wanted to head off any confusion. Cremastra (talk) 21:04, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

There is a new update for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it!

In this issue, we present the latest blogpost about us on WMF blog, and we invite you to share your feedback at the Wikifunctions' Project chat on the new proposed designs for the Function page.

Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check our archive!

Enjoy the reading! -- User:Sannita (WMF) (talk) 19:06, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

I would save humorous nominations like those for a more appropriate time like April Fool's. The Night Watch (talk) 18:20, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

You're probably right, but if humour is predictable and comes at the "correct" time then it isn't humour. A little fun goes a long way. Cremastra (talk) 18:26, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

Speaking with my 'crat hat on, RfA is one of the few places where something like April Fool's is the only time we allow such frivolity. I cannot force you to G7 it but I would ask that you do so. Primefac (talk) 20:12, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

I just deleted it before noticing this discussion. This sort of thing is just not on. Graham87 (talk) 02:58, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Matai Pukhiri, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tipra. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

There is a new update for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it!

In this issue, we look back at all the accomplishments that we achieved in 2023 and we thank you all for your help in achieving them. Also, we take a look at the latest software developments.

Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check our archive!

This will be the last newsletter for 2023, so see you again in 2024!

Enjoy the reading! -- User:Sannita (WMF) (talk) 11:49, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

Hello there, thanks for all of your contributions to Wikipedia! Wishing you a Very Merry Christmas and here's to a happy and productive 2024! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:12, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

@Dr. Blofeld Thank-you, and the same to you! Cremastra (talk) 20:44, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

I have removed the {{proposed deletion/dated}} tag from John Cooper (journalist), which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think this article should be deleted, please do not add {{proposed deletion}} back to the page. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks!

I'm new to the PROD process, so please do let me know if I'm doing this wrong! Jonathan Deamer (talk) 20:20, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

@Jonathan Deamer: Everything looks good, as the concern (sources) has been fixed. Thanks for your work! Cremastra (talk) 20:44, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

New Page Patrol | January 2024 Articles Backlog Drive
On 1 January 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each review will earn 1 point. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:10, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

I think that for the duration of the conflict, the map should be displayed in the infobox, as it rapidly changes and informs the readers of the ongoing situation. However, once the conflict is over, predictably with Israel in full control of Gaza, I think it will be more appropriate to add a gallery of images to the infobox. Ecrusized (talk) 09:32, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

@Ecrusized: OK, that's reasonable. Thanks for leaving a message here. Cremastra (talk) 20:52, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

Freestyle, or Latin freestyle (initially called Latin hip hop) is a form of electronic dance music that emerged in the New York metropolitan area, Boston, Philadelphia, and Miami, primarily among Hispanic Americans, Irish Americans, and Italian Americans in the 1980s. It experienced its greatest popularity from the late 1980s until the early 1990s. A common theme of freestyle lyricism originated as heartbreak in an urban environment typified by New York City. 69.115.130.88 (talk) 01:44, 23 December 2023 (UTC)

That's interesting to know. Thanks! Cremastra (talk) 02:19, 23 December 2023 (UTC)

Hello Cremastra: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Jerium (talk) 17:52, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

Jerium (talk) 17:52, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

~~~ Merry Christmas! ~~~
Joyeux Noël! ~ Buon Natale! ~ Vrolijk Kerstfeest! ~ Frohe Weihnachten!
¡Feliz Navidad! ~ Feliz Natal! ~ Καλά Χριστούγεννα! ~ Hyvää Joulua!
God Jul! ~ Glædelig Jul! ~ Linksmų Kalėdų! ~ Priecīgus Ziemassvētkus!
Häid Jõule! ~ Wesołych Świąt! ~ Boldog Karácsonyt! ~ Veselé Vánoce!
Veselé Vianoce! ~ Crăciun Fericit! ~ Sretan Božić! ~ С Рождеством!
শুভ বড়দিন! ~ 圣诞节快乐！~ メリークリスマス！~ 메리 크리스마스!
สุขสันต์วันคริสต์มาส! ~ Selamat Hari Natal! ~ Giáng sinh an lành!
Весела Коледа! ~ Meri Kirihimete!

Hello, Cremastra! Thank you for your work to maintain and improve Wikipedia! Wishing you a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year!
Chris Troutman (talk) 23:16, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

		The Invisible Barnstar
		Thank you for your participation in the Articles for Creation's November 2023 Backlog Drive! You made a total of 28 reviews, for a total of 36 points. – robertsky (talk) 06:51, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

– robertsky (talk) is wishing you Happy Holidays! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user Happy Holidays, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Happy holidays}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

– robertsky (talk) 06:51, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

Hello. I opened the issue above but only got 1 response. I am seeking more outside opinion but it seemed like canvassing. How to get more participation on that issue, or maybe you could also help to check on the questionable reference? Slothades (talk) 01:53, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

Source reliability is not my specialty, so I'd say follow the advice given by buidhe and Novem Linguae. If you want participation from editors interested in the topic, I'd suggest adding a {{Wikiproject please see}} message WT:MALAYSIA and maybe WT:ECONOMICS, like Novem Linguae mentioned. Cheers, 🎄Cremastra 🎄 (talk) 15:00, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

TQ Cremasta. Slothades (talk) 01:43, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Banded palm civet you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of 20 upper -- 20 upper (talk) 13:03, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

Since RfCs are generally supposed to run for 30 days, there was low participation, and other editors may want to opine on this issue (there's a big discussion on the use of image collages in year articles right now), would you consider reopening and relisting the discussion? Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 01:06, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

The article Banded palm civet you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Banded palm civet for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of 20 upper -- 20 upper (talk) 12:23, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

Are you reading what I wrote in the GA nom? 20 upper (talk) 14:15, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

Oops, my bad. 🌺 Cremastra (talk) 14:15, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

Don't edit the archived nomination. I will revert your edits. 20 upper (talk) 14:22, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

Does it matter? It's a useful checklist for me. See the history of the last review. 🌺 Cremastra (talk) 14:25, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

There is a new update for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it!

In this issue, we introduce our newest and much requested type of function, list. Also, we take a look at the latest software developments.

Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check our archive!

Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next Volunteers' Corner will be held on January 8, at 18:30 UTC (link to the meeting).

Enjoy the reading! -- User:Sannita (WMF) (talk) 10:37, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

		The New Page Reviewer's Iron Award
		For over 360 article reviews during 2023. Well done! Keep up the good work and thank you! Dr vulpes (Talk) 02:49, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

Thank you! 🌺 Cremastra (talk) 12:36, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

There is a new update for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it!

In this issue, we present you an essay from Denny and we introduce a new section of the newsletter, dedicated to the "function of the week". Also, we take a look at the latest software developments.

Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check our archive!

We also wanted to note that we are in the process of moving the Updates from Meta to Wikifunctions. We'll keep you updated about it.

Enjoy the reading! -- User:Sannita (WMF) (talk) 12:27, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 January 4 § Category:Unassessed vital articles by level on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Qwerfjkltalk 17:01, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

Hi, I see that you just closed the discussion on the request for Hertz (person) at AFC/RC. I was in the process of nominating the redirect for RfD, as I am not convinced is the PTOPIC. Just wanted to let you know. Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 21:18, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

Thanks. 🌺 Cremastra (talk) 21:44, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

Moved from User talk:Cremastra/sandbox

Hey @Cremastra. I wish you well on your perm request (though it would be frowned upon for me to go post '''Support'''). There is one part that I wanted to ask about (both now and during the previous request). To my understanding, the vast majority of "rename" closures at CfD are implemented by the Bot via WT:CFD/W (for non-admins) or WP:CFD/W (for admins). Is that your understanding as well? I think the most common CfD closer is Qwerfjkl, and they manually moved only 2 categories in 2023 (log). Are you looking to work on WP:CFD/W/M (manual implementation)? (I'm asking on this page because this sort of thing seems more pointed on a user talk page. You can delete this or move it elsewhere.) SilverLocust 💬 01:22, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

Hi SilverLocust. I'm not 100% certain about how CfD works yet (hence I hope to help there sometime in the future), but I would probably help at WT:CFD/W/M. In the past, when closing CfD's as merge, I did it myself using Cat-a-lot and no-one complained, but I plan to familiarize myself further with how CfD works. Thanks, 🌺 Cremastra (talk) 13:50, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

I recently noticed a message from Pppery to another user that you may find helpful on two points: "CfD desparately needs more closers (for the last few weeks one person has closed almost all discussions). In practice the easiest way to do non-admin closures properly is User:Qwerfjkl/scripts/CFDlister." (That script wasn't previously mentioned at WP:CFD/AI (the administrator closing instructions).) SilverLocust 💬 18:29, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Cremastra. Your account has been granted the "extendedmover" user right, either following a request for it or demonstrating familiarity with working with article names and moving pages. You are now able to rename pages without leaving behind a redirect, move subpages when moving the parent page(s), and move category pages.

Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:Page mover for more information on this user right, especially the criteria for moving pages without leaving a redirect. Please remember to follow post-move cleanup procedures and make link corrections where necessary, including broken double-redirects when suppressredirect is used. This can be done using Special:WhatLinksHere. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to secure your password. As with all user rights, be aware that if abused, or used in controversial ways without consensus, your page mover status can be revoked.

Useful links:

• Wikipedia:Requested moves
• Category:Requested moves, for article renaming requests awaiting action.

If you do not want the page mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! Primefac (talk) 15:48, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

Thank-you. 🌺 Cremastra (talk) 16:11, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

There is a new update for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it!

In this issue, we announce a redesign and rewrite of the Function page and we present our first "function of the week". Also, we take a look at the latest software developments.

Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check our archive!

Enjoy the reading! -- User:Sannita (WMF) (talk) 12:05, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

I've just had to clean up some sloppy editing you made at Anguinae a few days ago, which shows a lack of care. Regarding the 48-49 number, which you took as "citation needed", the source clearly stated The divergence between the Gerrhonotinae in North America and Anguinae in Europe is suspected to have occurred after a dispersal across the Thulean land bridge and before 48.6 million years when Anguinae fossils begin appearing at multiple sites in Europe. You also added "They are believed not to be monophyletic", when the source actually said According to Sullivan (1987), the subfamily Anguinae is not monophyletic, which is not the same at all, and that study was published nearly 40 years ago. According to the recent 2019 paper "Phylogenetic relationships and divergence dating in the Glass Lizards (Anguinae)" which was quoted for the evolution section: Within the Anguidae, the subfamily Anguinae consist of a monophyletic assemblage of elongated legless grass-swimming ecomorphs, so your claim that "They are believed not to be monophyletic" is hardly well supported enough to put in wikivoice is it? When writing about anything on Wikipedia, please put in the effort to actually properly assess recent scientific literature. Thanks. Hemiauchenia (talk) 09:44, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Sorry, and thanks. 🌺 Cremastra (talk) 14:19, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Welcome to WP:FEB24! I'm glad that you are here. One person cannot address the backlog, but all of us together might. Since you have edited lots of articles about biology and plants, how about starting out with these articles in Category:Articles lacking sources from December 2023:

• Cercospora capsici
• Ramularia cyclaminicola
• Ramularia spinaciae
• Sclerotium cinnamomi
• Urophlyctis leproides
• Pratylenchus musicola

- CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 15:06, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for the list, CactiStaccingCrane! 🌺 Cremastra (talk) 17:39, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Considering your recent reply on my talk page (which has since been reverted), I believe that I should remind you about this and recommend you should read WP:THREATEN DementiaGaming (talk) 02:53, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

@DementiaGaming: Reverted... by myself because I decided I didn't want any further part in this discussion. I did not intend to threaten you with that comment, and if it was interpreted as hostile then I apologize. Liz isn't threatening you either. If she had written if you do that again I will block you, that would likely be a threat. She is merely saying, as a statement of opinion, that a block may be called for. This is what I intended to say in my comment. I wrote The comment about the block is not a threat. It is a statement of fact. I'm not threatening to block you (I'm not an administrator and I stay clear of ANI when I can). As Liz (talk · contribs) said on their talk page, it's a warning, not a threat.

Again, I apologize if I have come across as hostile. 🌺 Cremastra (talk) 20:52, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

story · music · places

Thank you for improving articles in January! I remember Ewa Podleś on the Main page, and had - believe it or not - two musical DYK today. Shalom chaverim. On vacation, with something for your sweet tooth -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:17, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Thanks, Gerda. :) 🌺 Cremastra (talk) 22:21, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

I fixed the year (similar location but no sweets). Today: the performance of Anna Nekhames --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:26, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

Today a friend's birthday, with related music and a few new vacation pics --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:54, 30 January 2024 (UTC)

Psst, your old username is still on the WikiProject China participants list. It would seem relatively trivial to do a site search and swap out any mentions if you're so inclined—I just figured I'd make sure you're aware. Cheers! Remsense诉 09:59, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

Thanks, but I think it's fine. That page redirects here, and I have a large disclaimer on my userpage, so it shouldn't case any confusion. Happy editing, 🌺 Cremastra (talk) 13:38, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Philippine warty pig you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Etriusus -- Etriusus (talk) 16:23, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

The article Philippine warty pig you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Philippine warty pig for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Etriusus -- Etriusus (talk) 16:42, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

Welcome, welcome, welcome Cremastra! I'm glad that you are joining the drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.

CactiStaccingCrane (talk)15:37, 2 February 2024 UTC [refresh]via JWB and Geardona (talk to me?)

My name Is Aodhán Ó Ríordáin. I am the subject of the page. I did not create it. I was divorced on May 17th 2023 in the High Court in Dublin. There was no reporting of the divorce. My ex-wife is anxious that the page reflect her new martial status. I am deeply frustrated that I cannot correct this page which has inaccurate comments about my private life. AodhanORiordain (talk) 19:14, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

@AodhanORiordain: I understand your concerns. However, you need to understand that if anyone could claim they are person X and then edit personal details about person X's article, Wikipedia would be a libellous disaster. Under our conflict-of-interest policies, you shouldn't be editing articles about yourself. read this page for more information: "The information in your article about me is wrong. How can I get it fixed?" I hope this helps. If you have any more questions, you can ask me here or go to the Teahouse, a friendly help forum for new users. Cheers, 🌺 Cremastra (talk) 19:16, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

That's not good enough. I am a public representative and a member of the Irish Parliament. It is your responsibility to have accurate information on your page. I can provide any proof you require. It is your responsibility to resolve this situation immediately. AodhanORiordain (talk) 19:19, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

@AodhanORiordain: A reliable source would be nice. This sort of thing is not my specialty, so I would suggest asking your questions at the Teahouse where more knowledgeable users can help you. You can also submit an edit request to have information in the article changed. However, as I said, Wikipedia strongly discourages editing with a conflict of interest. 🌺 Cremastra (talk) 19:41, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

If and when there is coverage of the divorce in reliable sources, it will likely be added to the article. 🌺 Cremastra (talk) 19:43, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

(by talk reader) @AodhanORiordain: Actually, Cremastra has no responsibility in this matter nor does any other Wikipedian. Please appreciate that volunteer editors are less likely to aid those in poor deportment. Despite your frustration, issuing threats to our volunteers is going make matters worse for you. Chris Troutman (talk) 19:44, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

What legal threats? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:33, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

@AodhanORiordain: What Cremastra told you is correct, and is our standard advice. If you follow it, your identity can be confirmed and your desire to update the article with this new information can be met, as as happened in similar cases for thousands of other people. Some even more important than you. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:33, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

Just wanted to reply no worries to your comment here, since that discussion can no longer be commented in. KhndzorUtogh (talk) 00:30, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

Thanks. Happy editing, 🌺 Cremastra (talk) 00:31, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		This award is given in recognition to Cremastra for collecting at least 25 points during the January 2024 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions played a part in the 16,070 reviews completed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog! Hey man im josh (talk) 22:39, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

Thanks, Hey man im josh. 🌺 Cremastra (talk) 22:53, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

story · music · places

Thank you for improving article quality in February. - The image, taken on a cemetery last year after the funeral of a distant but dear family member, commemorates today, with thanks for their achievements, four subjects mentioned on the Main page and Vami_IV, a friend here. Listen to music by Tchaikovsky (an article where one of the four is pictured), sung by today's subject (whose performance on stage I enjoyed two days ago). -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:11, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

more music and flowers on Rossini's rare birthday --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:14, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

Just curious if it's too easy. The Secret Guestbook is hidden, but this one should be really hidden. Panini! • 🥪 04:11, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

I was just curious to see if there was a "sandbox7", following the natural progression. It's a bit too easy, possibly, but if there was no clue whatsoever it would be diabolically hard to find. 🌺 Cremastra (talk) 13:21, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy) on a "History and geography" request for comment, and at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "Economy, trade, and companies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 07:30, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Red Sea crisis on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 10:31, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive: On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for closing the RM. Could you explain your rationale, please? Rosbif73 (talk) 20:21, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

@Rosbif73: Sure. Per WP:NCROY, we should disambiguate when the title is ambiguous; and "oppose" !voters have, in my view, adequately proven that the title is somewhat ambiguous, not only with other monarchs named Anne, (besides Queens-consorts) but also with Queen Anne Architecture (which can easily be referred to as "Queen Anne": “Is that house Edwardian?” “Of course not, it's Queen Anne.”). Thus, I think there is a rough consensus against the move. (Of course, if you disagree with me, there are steps you can take.) 🌺 Cremastra (talk) 20:33, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

Per NCROY, we should disambiguate only for monarchs whose common name is ambiguous or not the primary meaning (my emphasis). Only two opposers doubted that Anne is the primary topic, and evidence in favour of primacy was provided. You don't address that aspect in your closing rationale. (And yes, I'm aware of MR, but let's not go there just yet). Rosbif73 (talk) 21:07, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

That guideline uses or, not and. The title is ambiguous, and it's unclear what the PTOPIC for the title "Queen Anne" should be. 🌺 Cremastra (talk) 23:32, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

In the discussion, both sides acknowledge ambiguity. The RfC is primarily about whether Queen of Great Britain is the primary topic for the article title Queen Anne. The close does not address this at all. It does not demonstrate a clear understanding of the discussion and of the WP:P&G that is applicable. There is also the spirit and intent of this RfC that has been referred to. In the response immediately above, you would state: it's unclear what the PTOPIC for the title "Queen Anne" should be. There is significant discussion regarding this and substantial evidence presented. With particular reference to evidence (rather than subjective assertions), can you please explain how you have concluded the PTOPIC is unclear. Cinderella157 (talk) 11:13, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

Sorry, referring to the PTOPIC was a mistake. I just meant that the title is ambiguous and disambiguation was needed.

@Cinderella157 and Rosbif73: I'm willing to withdraw my closure if two editors take issue with it. 🌺 Cremastra (talk) 13:44, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

That may well be an appropriate course. Cinderella157 (talk) 13:54, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

I encourage you to check noms’ contrib volume before accusing them of wasting their time :)

Fyi, I simply was curious to know if anyone had legitimately earned the top couple ranks so I checked transclusions.

In seriousness…at a venue like MfD no one is likely to take offense at remarks like that…but in a CT area it could be different. Best to spread positive vibes.

(In this case blanking had not occurred to me as a solution. We all overlook such brilliant solutions sometimes lol)

Cheers, RadioactiveBoulevardier (talk) 04:16, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

		Citation Barnstar
		This award is given in recognition to Cremastra for collecting more than 10 points during the WikiProject Unreferenced articles's FEB24 backlog drive. Your contributions played a crucial role in sourcing 14,300 unsourced articles during the drive. Thank you so much for participating and helping to reduce the backlog! – – DreamRimmer (talk) 18:10, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

Your feedback is requested at Talk:1977 anti-Tamil pogrom on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 02:30, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

story · music · places

Thank you for improving article quality in March! - I uploaded Madeira vacation pics (from back home, at least the first day) and remember Aribert Reimann. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:22, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

Some days later, a calf in the mist and chocolate cake, and a story of collaboration --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:17, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for signing up for EB1911 verification. I see your edit to Arthur Nikisch; it would be more complete if you could add the volume and page parameters (in this case volume 19, page 690). Long ago there was consensus, which I can no longer find, that this would help verification even if there is a wikisource version now.

I'd like to draw your attention to the standard guidelines at the top of the project's detailed list pages, for example Wikipedia:WikiProject Missing encyclopedic articles/1911 verification/A5 (which has the Nikisch link). They are actually more up to date than the more generic Wikipedia:WikiProject Missing encyclopedic articles/1911 verification.

Thanks again. David Brooks (talk) 00:03, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for the introduction, DavidBrooks. (I've added the parameters to the citation at Arthur Nikisch). 🌺 Cremastra (talk) 00:11, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

Hello Cremastra,

Backlog update: The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to Schminnte, who led with over 2,300 points.

Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive.

Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the May backlog drive planning discussion.

It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated!

2023 Awards

Onel5969 won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar. Hey man im josh led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing!

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers deployed the rewritten NewPagesFeed in October, and then gave the NewPagesFeed a slight visual facelift in November. This concludes most major work to Special:NewPagesFeed, and most major work by the WMF Moderator Tools team, who wrapped up their major work on PageTriage in October. The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers will continue small work on PageTriage as time permits.

Recruitment: A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited.

Reviewing tip: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated NPP Browser tool.

Reminders:

• You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Pages Patrol Discord.
• Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
• To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:27, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

2409:40C1:21:3288:8000:0:0:0 (talk) 09:01, 6 April 2024 (UTC) 34

Hi! Do you have a question about editing Wikipedia? Cremastra (talk) 11:39, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

Hi Cremastra, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers.

Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.

Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! – Joe (talk) 09:15, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vladyslav Yakubovskyi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vladyslav Yakubovskyi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Eastmain (talk • contribs) 17:01, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

New Page Patrol | May 2024 Articles Backlog Drive
On 1 May 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each review will earn 1 point. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:14, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

story · music · places

Thank you for improving article quality in April! -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:55, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

Thanks, Gerda. Good to see pear trees in bloom. Cremastra (talk) 14:12, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

I'm not going to get into an edit war, because obviously the early close is no longer uncontroversial, but I think this was very poorly judged. Early closes citing WP:NOTNOW or WP:SNOW have been a routine part of RfA for as long as it has existed. You only have to look through the RfA archives to see that such closes are common, do not require the candidate to withdraw first, and do not require a 'crat (in fact, they rarely involve one). They are done as a favour to the candidate, to spare them going through a vote that has no chance of succeeding. I strongly encourage you to consider self-reverting, quickly. – Joe (talk) 13:20, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

Fully agree with Joe. Reopening this is not helpful for either the candidate or the community. —Kusma (talk) 13:35, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

@Kusma @Joe Roe  Done. I've reverted my revision of the page so that it removes Toadette's self-nom. Feel free to let me know if you have any questions. Thanks. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 17:49, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

NoobThreePointOh, it does not display on "recently closed RfAs". — ♠ Ixtal ^{( T / C )} ⁂ Non nobis solum. ♠ 17:56, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

That's because they didn't actually close it, they reverted their removal of an open RFA. Primefac (talk) 18:02, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

That was my fault. I don't know why, but I really thought it was closed. To be honest though, I have been scrolling through the general comments, and a lot of people have been saying that it is a NOTNOW. I don't know. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 18:05, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

I'm also a little concerned about making a controversial revert just before going offline. Valereee (talk) 18:58, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

@Joe Roe, Kusma, NoobThreePointOh, Ixtal, Primefac, Valereee, and Firefangledfeathers: I fully apologize, the re-open was very much ill-considered. If you think self-reverting is the best thing for the situation, then I'm happy to oblige. It seems I've managed to turn an uncontroversial close into a controversial one, and I'm sorry for that. Cremastra (talk) 19:50, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

Speaking only as one editor, that's what I'd like to see if only out of kindness for the candidate. Valereee (talk) 19:55, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

Me too; I think a self-revert would be easier/lower-drama than anyone else doing it. Levivich (talk) 20:02, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

 Done. Thanks. Cremastra (talk) 20:04, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

Thank you! I very much appreciate your responsiveness to these concerns. Things are always clearer in hindsight than in the moment, so for the record, I don't think you owe any apologies, and thanks again for self-reverting. Levivich (talk) 20:05, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC)