User talk:CommonKnowledgeCreator

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be auto-archived by Lowercase sigmabot III if there are more than 2.

CommonKnowledgeCreator is currently feeling discouraged about Wikipedia and is taking an off-and-on wikibreak due to loss of motivation. Your help in cheering this user up would be appreciated. They will return when their wikistress has dissipated and their confidence in the wikicommunity has been restored. Wikipedia is run by a group of long-term editors who effectively assert ownership over the project by abusing the consensus policy to prevent any change to other policies, guidelines, and norms that are at least in need of reform. Since this effectively requires editors who wish to edit to be subjected to rules that are not functional and that they have no ability to change, there does not appear to be much of a reason to continue to participate in this project. Besides, research on digital divides has shown that greater equality of internet access has not reduced knowledge divides, so continuing to participate in a project to give free access to the sum of all human knowledge must not be a worthwhile use of time (if it ever was).

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. ==

Please stop removing the old version, it's getting annoying thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:183:4C80:7F70:284F:AE18:6111:C807 (talk) 22:32, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have provided no reasons for why it should be reverted to the previous revision. No content from the version you wish for the article to be reverted was removed from the article, but was merged into the Contributing factors section as part of a reorganization of that section's content. -- CommonKnowledgeCreator (talk) 23:44, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I just knew that you reverted my edits on the Senate's prediction and likely to reject the budget cuts via the H.R. 4 (Recession Act of 2025). Thank you. Akhil K. (talk) 19:58, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

He keeps editing and messing up current information aka common knowledge 2601:183:4C80:7F70:BDF6:5176:B73:AA26 (talk) 01:01, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

He's still doing it and locked edits, this guy is vandalising everything 2601:183:4C80:7F70:BDF6:5176:B73:AA26 (talk) 01:02, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I edited it, because it's removing important factors that's why thank you very much 2601:183:4C80:7F70:BDF6:5176:B73:AA26 (talk) 01:03, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I was wondering if you could give me your thoughts on the article that I'm setting up, Endorsements in the 1976 Democratic presidential primaries. I'm experimenting with the Endorsement Boxes, specifically in the Jimmy Carter section at the moment; I wanted to see how the lists would be like broken into smaller lists specific to their area, when they were in columns of different widths, and if I had a Box within a Box (for Former Office-holders). I don't want to proceed any farther with the Article until a format is decided given, if I were to go and adopt any of the changes, I'd have to convert everything additional. Ariostos (talk) 01:09, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

While I appreciate that you think highly enough of my opinion to ask, I don't know nearly enough about Wikipedia formatting to provide much input. Apologies. -- CommonKnowledgeCreator (talk) 19:58, 7 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]