User talk:CommanderInDubio/Archives/2021/March

This is an archive of past discussions with User:CommanderInDubio. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Hi there, CommanderWaterford, and welcome to Women in Red. You certainly made an outstanding start yesterday with five new biographies of women. Although you seem to be fully aware of all the editing requirements, if you have not already done so, you might find it useful to look through our Primer for creating women's biographies. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 11:54, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Ipigott, mange tak og have en dejlig dag :-) (for non danish readers: thank you very much and have a nice day!) CommanderWaterford (talk) 11:58, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Women in Red | March 2021, Volume 7, Issue 3, Numbers 184, 186, 188, 192, 193 Online events: New: Art+Activism | VisibleWikiWomen Contest (Jan/Feb/Mar): Africa Year-long campaign: Women's rights Continuing: #1day1woman Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage | Help us plan future events Become a member | Opt-out of notifications Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Ipigott (talk) 11:54, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Just stopping by to say thanks for your help fixing up the stub tags on the articles I created :) ThereWerentAnyUsernamesLeft (talk) 07:51, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

ThereWerentAnyUsernamesLeft, Coincidence :), you are welcome, please do not forget to provide more sources to your articles. CommanderWaterford (talk) 07:53, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Coincidence? :) And I will, for those I was trying to create stubs to get things started. ThereWerentAnyUsernamesLeft (talk) 07:55, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Thanks! Hook0601 (talk) 22:34, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

This commander is a very nice guy. I created my first article today and Commander introduced me to your community. Thanks for the warm welcome! Signed, TicTacTax (talk) 18:44, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your kind welcome and very quick approval of my first Wikipedia article.

I have reacted to your addition of a tag advising the improvement of categories by adding more specific categories. Does the tag disappear eventually on its own, or does it need even more categories to disappear, or does it require action on your part or my part?

Best regards,
 Neatlas (talk) 15:06, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi @Neatlas: - I removed the tag, it does not remove automatically, any editor can remove it if he has valuable reason to do so. Happy Editing and welcome! CommanderWaterford (talk) 16:59, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

	The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
	Thank's for taking down my article, it actually helped me, I am currently changing some mistakes that I did not realize, if you had no notified me, I would probably have not known that those mistakes were there, your work is appreciated. Thank you :) Signed, (talk) 20:37, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Just wanted to say good job on your work at AfC - with several of the most active reviewers not being active it's really good to see a new active member KylieTastic (talk) 12:31, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Hello dear, I hope youre doing well. Plesse kindly copyediting on Zaw Wai Soe for better standard. Thanks Taung Tan (talk) 10:24, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

hello sir. I want to creat an article about (muneer lyati) and i found that it was deleted (by you) is it possible to create it again or it will be deleted. thanks in advance. --Ismail2212 (talk) 10:21, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Ismail2212,You must have me confused, I did not delete your draft nor did I edited it - your draft had been deleted by Sysop Deb and was tagged for deletion by JalenFolf, you will need to ask one of them, of course you are free to create a new (better) draft. CommanderWaterford (talk) 10:26, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

thanks for replying but i am not talking about (draft andrea prince) but I am talking about (muneer lyati) which i haven't edited it before. please see again and sorry for disturbing. thanks in advance--Ismail2212 (talk) 11:19, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Ismail2212, you will need to be somewhat more precise - I can see in the logs that your user account had not made any edit others than on draft Andrea prince - I cannot find any (deleted) article "munger lyati" nor I came in touch with an article or draft with this name in the past, please notice also that I do not have rights to delete an article so I cannot have deleted it at all. Perhaps you can insert a link to the mentioned article. CommanderWaterford (talk) 11:27, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

this is the article i am talking about

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Muneer_Lyati --Ismail2212 (talk) 11:37, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Ismail2212, ah, ok - this article had been tagged the 5th of February for speedy deletion and it had been deleted by Sysop Ponyo. You sure can create a new article with the subject, please have look at WP:YFA before. CommanderWaterford (talk) 11:40, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

i can do it but i want to know why the page was deleted so that i can avoid those mistakes--Ismail2212 (talk) 11:49, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Ismail2212, I do not have access to the deleted page but it was tagged as CSD A7 - reasons for doing so you can find here WP:A7. CommanderWaterford (talk) 11:52, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

thanks so much for your patience i will create it and wish you will have a look.thanks again--Ismail2212 (talk) 12:00, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

hello, i created the page and i want it to be reviewed what should i do ? thanks in advance.--Ismail2212 (talk) 15:19, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Ismail2212, your article has already been published, it will be reviewed automatically at some time by other editor(s). CommanderWaterford (talk) 15:29, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Please engage with the unsubstantiated [warning] you have left on my talk page. You have received previous warnings (and even a ban) for being unwilling to engage, and warnings for abusing warning templates in the past. Uses x (talk) 19:22, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Uses x, done. Let me add - it is a welcome message, not any warning at all. CommanderWaterford (talk) 19:30, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Your message included "Unfortunately, your edit to 2021 Myanmar Protests does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media". Saying that something doesn't conform to policy is a warning. It may have been a correct warning (I haven't checked, but the correct link seems to be 2021 Myanmar protests) but you must take responsibility for what you say, whether in your own words or by issuing a template. Phil Bridger (talk) 20:44, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Spanish Armed Forces during the period of Francoism you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Buidhe -- Buidhe (talk) 01:42, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

The article Spanish Armed Forces during the period of Francoism you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Spanish Armed Forces during the period of Francoism for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Buidhe -- Buidhe (talk) 02:02, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Once again, can you please wait at least 30 seconds before I switch friom the article to its talk page ? Thank you. LouisAlain (talk) 10:50, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

LouisAlain, I admit that is was quite fast but please notice that this is a collaborative project. In the moment you publish your article to the mainspace any editor is free to work with it, I also saw no Edit Conflict at all. CommanderWaterford (talk) 10:54, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

	The Reviewer Barnstar
	Thank you for your contribution. you will like it. Dam222 🌋 (talk) 13:04, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for reviewing my submission and for the warm welcome to the community. --Glorytohypnotoad (talk) 19:22, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Rivalry between Cologne and Düsseldorf you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Buidhe -- Buidhe (talk) 02:02, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

The article Rivalry between Cologne and Düsseldorf you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Rivalry between Cologne and Düsseldorf for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Buidhe -- Buidhe (talk) 02:22, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

@CommanderWaterford:

I salute the service of my master Dear friend and teacher, I would like to say that I added 6 other sources from Iran and world news agencies for Masoumeh Jafarzadeh page I hope you, dear master, remove the label However, I thank you very much my dear friend

• Masoumeh Jafarzadeh BEHZAD RICO (talk) 07:21, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

You are aware that this is not a school or educational institution, right? It's an organization/non profit that focuses on education but is by definition covered under db-org/corp and thus in the scope of A7. Not only that, it's a copyvio, advertisement and partially a hoax given its copied entirely from the mission statement of a completely different organization. CUPIDICAE💕 14:47, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Praxidicae, your Diff is a dead link. It defines itself as an educational organisation and by means is not eligible for A7. Earwig gave me no Copyvio for it. But by the way I was wondering about your Copyvideo CSD of a 2 sentence article an hour ago or so which has been deleted meanwhile, I was reminded many times that an article so short barely meets CSD G12 criteria. CommanderWaterford (talk) 14:54, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

No, that is not what NORG or NCORP say. A company that focuses on education might consider itself an educational organization but it is not exempt under NCORP or NORG. It wasn't a school and if you did any amount of searching, you'd know that. If you have a problem with my deletion tagging, feel free to bring it up at ANI. CUPIDICAE💕 14:56, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Commander, it's a deadlink because the page was deleted per A7. I would urge you not to remove CSD tags that have been placed by experienced reviewers - better leave it to a patrolling admin to make the determination. Prax is right that the A7 exemption that applies to schools does not extend to any and all organisations that are concerned with children and/or their education. GirthSummit _(blether) 13:32, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Girth Summit, if I remember correctly the CSD tag was not placed by Praxidicae, they just noticed my removal and noticed me about my mistake. As you know CSD Tags can be removed by any editor but in general I sure do agree on your advise. I am aware of Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Schools/Criteria for Speedy Deletion A7 and after considering his message I do agree. CommanderWaterford (talk) 16:49, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

No, it was placed by another patroller, who is a fifteen-year veteran with the NPP perm - in such cases, I'd advise you to leave it and allow an admin to review. GirthSummit _(blether) 16:51, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

I don't know anything about this particular case, but I certainly don't agree with that "admin knows best" message. Anyone apart from the article creator can, in good faith, remove a speedy deletion tag, and we have certainly had admins who delete things that are tagged without checking them properly (it was after more than a decade of such abuse being regularly pointed out by me before one particlular admin got defrocked). When there is a good-faith disagreement then WP:AFD is the way to go for anyone who thinks an article should be deleted. Phil Bridger (talk) 17:10, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Phil Bridger, thank you and I, too, do not agree on "admin knows best" since I come across every day with several admins and long-time editors who make a bunch of mistakes, in the end we are all humans and make mistakes (well, abuse is something completely different, of course) but I am sure that this was not what Girth Summit wanted to point out - they both are right, I should not have removed the CSD Tag although I definitely did it in good faith and the idea of being right. CommanderWaterford (talk) 17:22, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Just edit conflicted with you there Commander. Phil Bridger, thanks for your input, but you aren't perhaps aware of the full circumstances - I have for the past few weeks been offering CdrW the odd piece of guidance, as part of an informal arrangement we came to when I unblocked them in January (not all of which has taken place at this talk page). This particular piece of advice, which I stand by as they build up their experience and the trust of the community, is part of that arrangement, and the Commander can take it or ignore it as they see fit. Best GirthSummit _(blether) 17:26, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

For clarification, this was unambiguously not a school nor could it be construed as such, hence my comment. The entirety of the article was copied from this source, which was copied in full about a completely unrelated organization, beginning at gap in urban India between... and ending at break out of the cycle of poverty. CUPIDICAE💕 17:37, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello CommanderWaterford. Thank you for your meticulous and precise follow-up on the details of my modest contributions. I am learning a lot from you. Cordially. --Kalimoun (talk) 10:12, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article AMC AMX III you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of JPxG -- JPxG (talk) 01:42, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi CommanderWaterford, Citations for Tom Bertram updated as requested - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Tom_Bertram_(singer/songwriter)#Tom_Bertram_%28singer%2Fsongwriter%29

If you need anything else to be satisfied with this article please let me know, MayerJames — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mayerjames (talk • contribs) 17:35, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi CommanderWaterford, amended url here for Tom Bertram (singer/songwriter) draft page for you to review with citations updated - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Tom_Bertram_(singer/songwriter) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mayerjames (talk • contribs) 08:00, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Mayerjames, thank you, I usually do not review an article twice - another reviewer will pick this up - please be patient, there are currently around 5,000 articles waiting for a review, it can take up to several months. CommanderWaterford (talk) 08:03, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Once again: I know what I have to do. Please, refrain your urge to intervene within seconds after I've finished a translation. Maybe you'd be better inspired to work on articles such as Königliche Kunstgewerbeschule München. There are dozen of thousands of that kind on Wiki. I know your argument about the collaborative encyclopedia, but jumping on a new page is beyond participation, it's bad manners (being polite here). LouisAlain (talk) 09:38, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

LouisAlain, once again - a such experienced editor should be absolutely aware when an article is ready to be published into mainspace - you are frequently publishing not yet finished articles into mainspace and then working on them for hours, tagging them as in use. Instead of giving me advise where to work I suggest improving your recent submissions which have several totally unreferenced sections. CommanderWaterford (talk) 09:42, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Adding references, now that would be a collaborative attitude. LouisAlain (talk) 09:58, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi, I think you needs to learn more about fair use photo [1]. You did many controversial editing on AfD of Burmese articles and fair use photo. Thanks Taung Tan (talk) 18:28, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

thank you very much for guiding me! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ismail2212 (talk • contribs) 15:32, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

How do I create a Wikipedia page for Artist and Photojournalist Stephen S. Myers, works in the Victoria & Albert, George Eastman House, Albright Knox, profiled in LIFE Magazine, etc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eastcoasthawaiian (talk • contribs) 21:08, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

• Naeem Jafar Amit (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Bangladesh TechnoSity Limited (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Thank you for your review of my article on Bangladesh TechnoSity Limited. Can you please point out to specific words, phrases or sentences which need to be changed to make the article more neutral? Naeem Jafar Amit (talk) 07:21, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello CommanderWaterford, I wanted you to review Draft:Soibugh. It was submitted nearly a month ago and it probably meets WP:GEOLAND. It is about a village in Budgam district in Jammu and Kashmir, India. Thank you! –Kammill ⟨talk⟩ 08:38, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.

Comment: Nonsense. I asked the Editor to seek for consensus at the talk page which they did not and reverted twice my edits. CommanderWaterford (talk) 09:56, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Taung Tan (talk) 09:51, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Not even 24 hours unblocked this account and now bringing a content dispute to ANI - Pinging for courtesy @Girth Summit: CommanderWaterford (talk) 09:55, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

I didn't do any mistake but you did. Anyway, I follow wp:AGF. 😊 Taung Tan (talk) 10:09, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

This isn't some sort of game. While I'm inclined to AGF, I think this could be considered harassment of CW. Your thread is also very inappropriate. I advise you withdraw it before it gets snow closed. Firestar464 (talk) 10:21, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Sure. You did several mistakes, beginning by taking it to the wrong forum, ANI is not for EW, not WP:AGF (once again). templating an experienced editor etc etc. but I let this up to an admin what to do with your account. If you have a content dispute the Article talk page is the right place to discuss this, thinking ANI will help you to push by any means your edits is a mistake made quite often. You should have learned from your previous block, that is one the reasons why they blocked you only temporarily. I like to spend my energy on more productive tasks here. CommanderWaterford (talk) 10:27, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Let me give you some advice - you better remove immediately accusing an Editor like WWGB of acting biased. You really need to understand that no one wants to do you any harm but you cannot treat editors like this. Not even 24 hours after your unblock and you are starting again. CommanderWaterford (talk) 10:50, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

• Sfournais (talk · contribs)
  • Jan Philip Solovej (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
  • Draft:Jan Philip Solovej (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Dear Commander Thank you for your assistance with my recent submission on Jan Philip Solovej. Since there is already a wiki-page on that person in Danish https://da.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jan_Philip_Solovej and in German https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jan_Philip_Solovej, I believe that the subject should meet the criteria of Wikipedia.

So my contribution is really only a brief English version of existing pages. However, it seems that the best way to crosslink to other wiki-pages in other languages is to do so once the page is published (via the wikidata project). Therefore, I am waiting for the page to get published before I do the linking.Sfournais (talk) 18:31, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Sfournais (talk) 18:31, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Sfournais, I am afraid but in its current state there is no way of approving your draft, please follow the comments given at the Decline. Being published in other editions of Wikipedia does not mean that they will be published in the English one (they have sometimes different guidelines) and furthermore the mentioned ones do have other references than your draft. A Homepage is not a WP:RS. CommanderWaterford (talk) 18:36, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

It is very easy to add some sources to this article about a subject who passes multiple counts of WP:PROF, so I have done so and moved it to main space where it belongs. Phil Bridger (talk) 19:00, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Thank you, I allowed myself to add the missing categories and stub sorting. CommanderWaterford (talk) 19:06, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Some years ago I was very active, as you will see of you inspect old backlog drives. I had a several year wikiburnout, so I am by no means as active today. Not much changed here in the several year gap, though. I see symptoms of burnout when very experienced and respected editors suffer indeffing or topic bans. Wikipedia must be fun, otherwise it is like a job that never ends Fiddle Faddle 18:37, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Timtrent, I totally understand you, especially if you see the messages of today running onto my talk page. AfC is a very thankless task, you are making mistakes (890 articles in the last 30 days reviewed, 2 were challenged for AfD, 1 fork and 1 Copyvio overseen) and there will be a reason why so few volunteers actively participate specially with an eye on the long experienced editors. CommanderWaterford (talk) 20:47, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

We are allowed to make mistakes. All we need to do is to view a draft as standing a better that 60% chance of surviving an immediate deletion process.If I comment in an AfD on one of my drafts I tend to make that comment and stay neutral

We can miss copyvios, but we must not lose sleep over it. Someone else will catch them if we do not. We are just volunteers doing our best Fiddle Faddle 22:33, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

You accepted this draft, which is a clear fork/duplicate of Chinese painting. Johnbod (talk) 20:19, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

@Johnbod, I’d say it was a honest mistake on their part. Celestina007 (talk) 20:35, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Celestina007, an embarrassing mistake, indeed. CommanderWaterford (talk) 20:36, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Oh, I'm sure of that. Not to worry, but the bolded blue-link was a clue. Johnbod (talk) 22:15, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

• Jaken9273 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Salvner (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Aight then. I will admit this page was made as a joke. take it down or whatever, i just thought it would be fun to have a fan made page for a relatively famous speedrunner.

Jaken9273 (talk) 02:20, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for the advise and will definitely make necessary updates as needed by the wiki. Would you please guide me if I can remove the sections for which I can't mention the references at present and publish the [Draft:Nikhileswar] for your review? In a future time, as and when I gather reference, I will keep updating. I think it would be fine. Anyhow, please advise. Thanks a lot for your patience. :-) Bagathikishore (talk) 12:49, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for your message! I'll make sure to visit all the relevant links provided by you :)

Hoda.H.M. (talk) 15:14, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi! The source are literally there at the very end of the paragraph! they are for the whole content of the paragraph. Xia ^{talk to me} 18:53, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Xia, of course but although it is not a must the article lacks inline citations. CommanderWaterford (talk) 18:55, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi I removed the timeline from the south atlantic cyclone thing is because it was useless — Preceding unsigned comment added by BlankedOutandIn (talk • contribs) 17:11, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

The information I removed from this article was sourced to a blog post which, in addition to failing to meet RS standards, did not actually include any of the stated information. This was not a "sandbox" edit. The reasoning for the removal was included in the edit notes and the removed text was moved to the Talk page specifically so that future reviewers could re-add it if it could be verified. 97.102.30.205 (talk) 20:16, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello Im Globe408 - the reason I deleted the content is because it is all fake information, used to make it look like they own the airline. It was no mistake. Although they were involved with certain aspects in management of the airline in 2017- 2019, they have nothing at all to do with airline now and the content they use. SEAIR International has no connection to XplorAsia at this time. In fact, the original seair page was redirected without any authorization to their page, and the content out of SEAIR International was stripped out. If you feel you need more validation or explanation, feel free to contact me or the airline directly. It would have been good if you caught the initial redirect to begin with. Thank you and hope this gets you, its my first time in wikipedia Globe408 (talk) 12:03, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Dear @CommanderWaterford:,

I just noticed, that you declined my draft https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Panocrat. Please help me, because I'm new to Wikipedia and don't understand the policy and the comments:

A.) You are completely right about the fact, that "google does not know neither this subculture nor the panostern". But please take into consideration that 1. the subculture lived mainly before the WWW was invented or common, so most of the sources are print sources, 2. Even so, the keyword "Panokratie" has 4840 hits (and had over 52.231 hits in 2005) 3. Wayback machines like http://web.archive.org/web/20101106191002/http://forum.panokratie.de/index.php show the former hugeness of this subculture (>6000 entries and > 285 former panocrat members only in this forums).

B.) The first rejection explanation textbox says, that the article "do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject". But if scientific books, published in peer review by the renowned "Springer-Verlag" publishing house are no "reliable sources", what are reliable sources for wikipedia?

C.) The second rejection explanation textbox indicates, that the article "reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article". I tried to maintain a neutral POV and I am unaware of any subjective information in this text, may be I'm wrong. So could you please give me an example, where to improve it?

I would appreciate help and may be a rethinking of the rejection due to the newly given informations! :-)

Kind Regards Kevin

Kevin Macker (talk) 12:42, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

which kind of citation u mean ? i used sources like transfermarkt and ogol, isnt them enough?

is not the enough?

Hi Commander Waterford, Thanks for noting that my Roberto Velasco Alvarez ^[1] draft needed inline citations and reliable sources. I've improved the article and added more sources such as Bloomberg, Reuters and other articles by some of the biggest Mexican media outlets. Could you help me review if the draft is okay now? Thanks so much.

This is addressed to CommanderWaterford

I understand that you have a concern about the depth of some or all of the references in the Draft R2Sonic.

My concern is that while this draft may be of small concern to a global group, it is very important to the non-governmental entities in the global hydrogaphic and environmental community.

The results, of hydrographic and environmental surveying, more so than the means of hydrographic and environmental surveying, are frequently the focus of conference presentations, scientific publications, and articles in industry magazines. Many individuals have heard, or seen, passing references of little more than the model number assigned to a piece of equipment, despite that equipment embodying major technological innovations in multibeam echosounders.

I believe the draft R2Sonic Wikipedia entry, if approved, would fill an existing information gap concerning the existence of multibeam echosounder features which are available and should be considered prior to the proposal phase of any new project related to hydrographic and environmental surveying.

Possibly more importantly it might answer the question as to why large companies (like Kongsberg and Teledyne) who supply hydrographic equipment do have their Wikipedia entry while small companies like R2Sonic are absent.

R2Sonic is a small company with about a dozen employees but what distinguishes it from other companies that manufacture equipment used in hydrographic and environmental surveying is that R2Sonic is a leading source of innovative design, not just a manufacturer of equipment. 20yrHTP (talk) 16:55, 13 March 2021 (UTC) §

Please notice kindly the decisions provided in the decline of your draft. Before eventually improving and resubmitting your draft you might be perhaps further interested in reading WP:COMPANY and WP:OTHERXIST. If you resubmit your draft another reviewer will check it. CommanderWaterford (talk) 16:59, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

When you accepted RØRY, were you aware that we already have Roxanne Emery which is the same person? And also likely undisclosed paid editing. See this. -- Whpq (talk) 18:35, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Awesome :-( My apologies, i forgot to look for her full name. CommanderWaterford (talk) 18:41, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Commander,

First, thank you for all of your work. You have an impressive edit count for someone who's been helping out here less than a year.

Second, when you are tagging stale drafts, please remember to check the edit history. Draft:Traci Callahan was tagged for deletion by you but had been edited earlier today. It was brought to my attention so it was restored but this is just a reminder to make sure the last non-bot edit was at least 6 months ago. Thanks again. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:27, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Liz, thanks for noticing (and deleting all those drafts every day). CommanderWaterford (talk) 21:31, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

I see we both hit it at the same time. Weirdly my edit, later than yours, overwrote yours. Fiddle Faddle 23:11, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Timtrent, no prob - earwig gave me 0,0 but have a look here: https://en.everybodywiki.com/Boris_Berenfeld CommanderWaterford (talk) 23:16, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

CommanderWaterford, regrettably the rubbish has a CC licence. Well spotted. Fiddle Faddle 07:52, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Ah, now I see. Our deletion log shows it to have been an abandoned draft. everybodywiki "rescued" it and scraped it. Our new editor copied and pasted it back here instead of going for a refund Fiddle Faddle 07:56, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

I had been holding on to a translation of the Battle of Ceuta for a few months and just learned that you published it. ;_; You did a better job than I did though. puggo (talk) 00:33, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

The purpose of this article is to mention one of the oldest disk image tools for Windows (among WinImage or WinISO), mentioend in books from O'Reily and AMedia. It's doubtful who and why deleted the original wiki article from 2006 (without any proposals for improves or cleaning), keeping tons of clones with obvious advertising content (exist even now). But why is it deleted today is totally not understandable, sorry. Is it something personal? — Preceding unsigned comment added by DiskxpertDE (talk • contribs) 10:28, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

DiskxpertDE, ? - No article of you has been deleted. Your draft has been declined and what makes you believe that the Reviewer did not read your draft!? Almost any disk tool had been mentioned in books of O'Reily in this decade. CommanderWaterford (talk) 10:32, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Sorry for being emotional. Things were not that complicated 20 years ago. Speaking about book references - most of modern disk image tools were created after those decade anyway. My goal is more historical than try to be up-to-date. I really don't know what exactly needs to be improved, could you please help me? DiskxpertDE (talk) 11:15, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

DiskxpertDE, I suggest reading the notability guideline for software at WP:NSOFTWARE, you should perhaps more emphasise of presenting that it is (if) the oldest one (and prove it not only by the homepage of the tool itself which clearly is not a WP:RS, if possible). I will further tag it for the relevant Wikiprojects, sometimes you get help from there, too. CommanderWaterford (talk) 11:23, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Thank you! DiskxpertDE (talk) 11:44, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi CommanderWaterford. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war.
• If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
• Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Anarchyte (talk • work) 10:57, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi ! You've rejected my first submission of an article I wrote about artist Antonio Vega Macotela. Please note I have not managed to link it to this artist's existing page in Dutch because of my poor knowledge of the Dutch language, but I'd like to mention that my version is much more completed and updated. Thank you!

Hello

I am editing this because NFL Free Agency has started today at noon. https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2021/03/15/welcome-to-free-agency/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.89.25.208 (talk) 17:48, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi IP-User, then you should add a source and an edit summary. CommanderWaterford (talk) 17:50, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Hey, thanks for assessments in two of my recent pages. I'm relatively new to wikipedia, but not to private wikis or markdown, and trying to get used to the wide-open (and intriguing, volatile) culture. Could you give me some of your thoughts on article translation or guide me to a central place, and discussions on multi-language labour and systems in place? I've begun paying attention to Wikidata but not sure, are you in there?Tomacpace (talk) 20:30, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Tomacpace, I made some edits at Wikidata but i am currently not very active, no. Regarding translations I would suggest having a look at Wikipedia:WikiProject Intertranswiki. Happy Editing, CommanderWaterford (talk) 20:32, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

This looks perfect, thanks! Tomacpace (talk) 20:37, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Why did you delete the information I wrote on the article about Wade Dominguez? The information is true and verifiable (the links prove it). I kept some of your changes but I added again the AIDS as the cause of death because is true (you can prove it clicking on the link and reading the article). Please let the page as it looks now because the info is true and correctly referenced. I know I didn't explain the changes I did, I won't do this mistake any more in the future. Would you let the article as it looks know please? or, Could you restore the info you deleted? Please answer to me when you can.Enciclopedia1993 (talk) 15:27, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Enciclopedia1993, first of all I would appreciate in the future some kind of "Hello Commander" or something similar. I reverted your edit because you deleted a whole bunch of info from an article without giving any explanation why you did so, thats all, as I have seen you have re-added them now, everything's fine. CommanderWaterford (talk) 15:56, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello CommanderWaterford. I would like to apologize for the previous message. I got worried about the information deleted and I was not polite. Please forgive me.Enciclopedia1993 (talk) 17:26, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Enciclopedia1993, no problem at all, happy editing. CommanderWaterford (talk) 17:35, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello.. Greetings..The author's last edit on Draft:Prasanth Nair is on 13 May 2020. It's been 2 years. No changes are there. So nominating for deletion. Thank you Wikiaddictcommo (talk) 17:18, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

• Not only that, the author is not active on Wikipedia. It's such a long time, it's still on draft. If possible, please delete. Wikiaddictcommo (talk) 17:20, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

  Wikiaddictcommo, yes but you are using the wrong Template for asking Speedy Deletion, I now tagged it correctly. CommanderWaterford (talk) 17:22, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Okay friend, thank you so much... Wikiaddictcommo (talk) 17:24, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello,

I am attempting to update the definition of Business Relationship Management as it is seen on your page here. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_relationship_management As the BRM role and capability has grown and evolved, the definition of BRM has also evolved with the rapidly advancing global community. I work for the BRM Institute, the leading resource and home for BRMs around the globe. The source information is cited from our website here https://brm.institute/

I apologize for missing any steps in this process, I have never edited wikipedia before as I am in administration. We are currently working with Techopedia to update their BRM definitions as well.

Here are the newer updated definitions we'd like to add to the current BRM Wikipedia page.

BRM — Business Relationship Management (BRM) is a philosophy, capability, discipline, and role to evolve culture, build partnerships, drive value, and satisfy purpose.

BRM Capability — A Business Relationship Management Capability is everything it takes, both visible and behind the scenes, to nurture relationships in an organization, creating a limitless supply of energy necessary to evolve culture, build partnerships, drive value, and satisfy purpose.

BRM Community of Practice — BRM community of practice is a leadership team that supports others practicing BRM by establishing BRM standards, quality, thought leadership, and continuous improvement.

BRM Discipline — The Business Relationship Management Discipline is an effective application of knowledge, demonstrated through a set of competencies and mindsets to advance a BRM Capability.

BRM Philosophy — Business Relationship Management Philosophy is a belief that positive relationships drive value in organizations and contribute the greatest positive impact to economic value, people, and the planet.

BRM Role — The Business Relationship Management Role is the set of competencies required to advance the BRM Capability.

Let me know what else I can do to help you in this process and thank you again so much for your time and assistance! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:9000:8500:77EB:5508:4C0E:5DDF:9BFE (talk) 20:49, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

You will need to provide sources for your additions. I suggest having a look at Help:Referencing for beginners and WP:RS. Good place for asking for help is also the WP:Teahouse. CommanderWaterford (talk) 20:55, 16 March 2021 (UTC) Hello, Thank you for your assistance. Here is the location where the above information is cited from https://brm.institute/about-business-relationship-management/

Do you have any proof it's been shut down? I heard in through this now dead link on Sunday and Monday. www.kj6eo.com:8901 I have recordings for proof. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.198.164.225 (talk) 22:36, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Ok now. It was reported as dead. Please do explain your edits in the edit summary, you removed before several edits without giving an explanation. Happy Editing, CommanderWaterford (talk) 22:41, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

• Davidrayedit (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Jackie Curtiss (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Davidrayedit (talk) 23:09, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Davidrayedit, please follow the links given to you at the rejection, you will need to prove notability for your subject and currently I do not see any which would fit - please see WP:BIO. CommanderWaterford (talk) 23:47, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi! Thanks for your supportive reply at my attempt to write an entry for Jackie Curtiss. While I understand Jackie may not meet the criteria for being significant enough to warrant an entry it's actually for this exact reason that I feel compelled to make a case for his inclusion. Although he was a significant contributor to the history of Indigenous rights and representation in the arts in the USA, due to systemic racism he has largely been erased from history because he is of Indigenous descent. It is only through a recent publication of a book on Indigenous Comedians entitled We Had a Little Real Estate Problem that he is being rediscovered and I would like to be a part of rectifying this with a Wikipedia article. Please advise if this deserves any reconsideration.

Hi CommanderWaterford, you removed my edit because you said that I removed stuff "without adequately explaining why". I did not remove anything, I only added on. I undid your removal of my edit. Could you please explain why you did so because I do not see any problem with my edits, I cited 5+ sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Allahakhbar2023 (talk • contribs) 10:59, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Allahakhbar2023, you removed the maintenance tags and added some text but you did not explain sufficiently WHY you removed the tags, that was the reason.

CommanderWaterford (talk) 11:04, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi CommanderWaterford, I am sorry, it was a mistake. Could you please fix it? I am not sure how to. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Allahakhbar2023 (talk • contribs) 10:59, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

 Done CommanderWaterford (talk) 11:12, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi, just writing to inform you that I am contesting the CSD A10 for List of cases impacted by Kho Jabing, as I think it is a good split with the article being >200kb without the split. I think the Final effort article can be deleted, but I believe there is a good level of distance between Kho Jabing and its impact on subsequent cases for a split, with a summary on Kho Jabing article that links to the whole list. Xenmorpha (talk) 11:01, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

I had written what is the reality as I completed my 10th standard last year itself in that school , my original name is Nandan Ramesh , I am an experienced candidate of that school , I had just written that school's reality , why did u remove it? Cool Binge (talk) 13:38, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I made this edit to List of The Pink Panther cartoons because someone kept putting in episodes from Amazing World of Gumball in the list of cartoons. These do not belong there and it would be appreciated if these went away. That's why I did it. Thank you. 2:10EST March 17, 2021 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tales499 (talk • contribs) 18:11, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello. I have noticed your message on my talk page regarding edit in Shiva Tandava Stotra. I actually forgot to put the edit summary, which was "to redact redundant lines from the article." The lines were repetitive, so I omitted them. But I should've fill out the edit summary, which I certainly will remember in future.

Thanks,Elin Ranjan (talk) 19:40, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello. You reverted my edit to Microbial rhodopsin. My edit was to remove a redundant cite journal template, hence my edit summary 'clean up ref'. I have reverted your edit to my version. ArchaerhodopsinGuy (talk) 23:37, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

ArchaerhodopsinGuy, I am sorry but you will need to explain better: Why did you remove the reference? CommanderWaterford (talk) 23:41, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

@CommanderWaterford: I did not remove the reference. I simply removed the redundant cite journal template. The reference is defined earlier in the article so does not need to be defined again. ArchaerhodopsinGuy (talk) 23:43, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

ArchaerhodopsinGuy, well, you removed a WP:ILC but I see your motivation, okay. Happy Editing. CommanderWaterford (talk) 23:45, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

I didn't remove an ILC. Reference 23 is still there - it is used in two places in the article. It does not need to be defined twice. Using <ref name=Bada_Juarez/> for the second mention suffices. The cite journal template is not needed a second time, if <ref name=Bada_Juarez>{{cite journal |vauthors= Bada Juarez JF, Judge PJ, Adam S, Axford D, Vinals J, Birch J, Kwan TO, Hoi KK, Yen HY, Vial A, Milhiet PE, Robinson CV, Schapiro I, Moraes I, Watts A |year= 2021 |title= Structures of the archaerhodopsin 3 transporter reveal that disordering of internal water networks underpins receptor sensitization |journal= Nature Communications |volume= 12 |pages= 629 |doi= 10.1038/s41467-020-20596-0 |pmc= 7840839 |pmid= 33504778 }}</ref> has been used earlier in the article. ArchaerhodopsinGuy (talk) 23:51, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

• Fundamental1979 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Angelia Robinson (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Thank you for reviewing my draft. I will look to improving the references. If I removed the Amazon and Youtube references, would the article stand? There are references in the draft that are non-Amazon and Youtube and speak to the subject's bonafides. When I examine an existing page like that of Myron Butler (another gospel singer but one with a less accomplished career), I struggle to see why Angelia doesn't deserve her own page. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myron_Butler

fundamental1979 Fundamental1979 (talk) 04:24, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Fundamental1979 (talk) 04:24, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello CommanderWaterford, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Final efforts to save Kho Jabing's life, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: This appears to be a valid split given the size of the original article. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Barkeep49 (talk) 00:39, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Dear CommanderWaterford, I am new to editing wikipedia, but work with MaxRange, I wish it be be correct. The important reference is February 01 2017 Political Institutions and Regimes since 1600: A New Historical Data Set Max Rånge , Mikael Sandberg The Journal of Interdisciplinary History (2017) 47 (4): 495–520. https://doi.org/10.1162/JINH_a_01052

https://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/abs/10.1162/JINH_a_01052

Other documents are not published and preparatory and no longer valid. Best DrTruteller — Preceding unsigned comment added by DrTrueteller (talk • contribs) 11:52, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

DrTrueteller, please review the info I left you on your talk page - especially the part about WP:COI editing, if you add information to an article or delete it like in this case please always provide an explanation for the edit, thanks. CommanderWaterford (talk) 11:58, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Dear CommanderWaterford, I actually wrote such a motivation for a couple of hours this morning but it was deleted for some reason. Is there a copy somewhere? Best DrT — Preceding unsigned comment added by DrTrueteller (talk • contribs) 12:33, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Please do not nominate these for speedy deletion (unless there is something wrong with the target at Wiktionary). See Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 144#RfC: Cross-wiki redirects to Wiktionary for a recent discussion about their use. If you think there is something wrong with a specific crosswiki redirect, best to nominate at WP:RFD so others can check and discuss the deletion proposal. Happy editing, —Kusma (t·c) 14:02, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi Kusma, as far as I see this was a proposal, a survey and no policy at all - please have a look at WP:R2 ... "This applies to redirects (apart from shortcuts) from the main namespace to any other namespace except the Category:, Template:, Wikipedia:, Help: and Portal: namespaces,(...)". This is clearly not a shortcut so honestly I do not see any error at all on my site (apart from my personal opinion that those kind of "articles" do not make any sense at all). CommanderWaterford (talk) 16:09, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

The guideline governing these pages is at Wikipedia:Soft redirect (this also explains that they should be treated as redirects although they technically are just very short articles). The pages you nominated are soft redirects to the main space of Wiktionary, something we have had for at least 15 years when {{wi}} was first created. (Such soft redirects can help prevent WP:DICDEFs while pointing the reader to a place that does define the word). —Kusma (t·c) 21:27, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

ok, thank you Kusma for letting me know. CommanderWaterford (talk) 22:26, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

So, I would like to say that I'd like to get this straight.

But it's not the case.

Not only the reply I received from the person who undo my changes if false. (He says the link is clear... But the link is off).

Of course, he also does't watched the documentary that the link should be pointing to as well.

I doubt he looked at the SOURCE of it, the documentary itself (which i carefully took the time to edit and posted on youtube).

...But my "talks" were also deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pedrynh (talk • contribs) 17:20, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

So not only the reply i receivd if FALSE, since it was written to me that the Telegraph link is clear, (rather then the source itself?!), but the link is DEAD.

Not only that but my "talks" were erased?!

Congratulations. Thank you. Bye. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pedrynh (talk • contribs) 17:26, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi CommanderWaterford. What in particular did you find unconstructive about my edit to the Joe Montana lede? --Somarain (talk) 18:35, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Somarain, you removed several previous references without sufficient explaining why, further does your edit have some touch of WP:FANPOV. CommanderWaterford (talk) 18:39, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

CommanderWaterford, let me know where you want the explanation.

- [3] and [4]: these sentences are backed up in the body so citing them in the lede isn't necessary. - [6] and [7]: not lede worthy; ledes are not not just a list of every magazine that gave him a title in the past 35 years, that's what the career highlights section is for. For FANPOV, please be more specific. I'm not sure what you're referring to as I only removed and rephrased material already in the lede. --Somarain (talk) 19:02, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Somarain, you need to provide an explanation in the Edit Summary of the edits you make and for such huge removals it is better to additionally explain them at the talk page of the article. CommanderWaterford (talk) 19:04, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

CommanderWaterford thanks, I put a detailed list on the talk page. Let's move this discussion there. --Somarain (talk) 19:29, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'm KEleison. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Church Committee have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. KEleison (talk) 22:56, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

KEleison, I saw that you already reverted your own edit, I assume it was a mistake. Also please be careful with using warning templates to advanced editors. Happy Editing, CommanderWaterford (talk) 23:03, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

It was my mistake, sorry, I accidentally clicked on your name while using RedWarn because it was lagging. KEleison (talk) 23:07, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Dear CommanderWaterford, thank you for your help. I am a new user to wikipedia, and whilst I know lots of things i would like to put on Wkipedia, I am bad at technology, and unfamiliar with the Wikipedia rules. For example, i do not know how to do hyperlinks or citations. I attach a try:Individuals typically live in paper nests, which consist of a pedicle (a paper comb on the inside), an envelope, with a large entry hole on the bottom of the nest, contrary to its relative Vespa VelutinaWikipedia Asian Hornet, which makes a smaller, lateral entry hole.[18] i tried to hyperlink vespa velutina butfaileed. About the citation 18, is that how you do it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kathakrèse (talk • contribs) 21:01, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Kathakrèse, I assume that you are confusing me with the user Dyanega who commented on your latest edits, please read the comment he left you on your talk page. Citations are not inserted like you describe - please see WP:YFA and Help:Referencing for beginners. If you need afterwards further help I would suggest a visit at the WP:Teahouse. CommanderWaterford (talk) 23:19, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

assistance on AfC submission by Fundamental1979 ==

• Fundamental1979 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Angelia Robinson (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Thank you for reviewing my draft. I will look to improving the references. If I removed the Amazon and Youtube references, would the article stand? There are references in the draft that are non-Amazon and Youtube and speak to the subject's bonafides. When I examine an existing page like that of Myron Butler (another gospel singer but one with a less accomplished career), I struggle to see why Angelia doesn't deserve her own page. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myron_Butler Fundamental1979 (talk) 01:00, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Fundamental1979, you will not only have to remove the references, you will have to search for WP:RS at all since right now your article only consists of non of these. After adding those you could resubmit the draft and another reviewer will have an eye on it. CommanderWaterford (talk) 07:46, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

I was asked to remove these image size numbers by User:David.moreno72. 102.115.137.151 (talk) 11:35, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Dear CommanderWaterford, previously you gave me so much good feedback on how to improve the Charin Mendes article and in fact moderators took off the promotional flag as well and everything was good and I'm so thankful. However, now a new moderator by the name MrsSnoozyTurtle has flagged it with a COI flag and moved the article to the draft space stating it is "over redirect: BLP with promo and COI concerns, incubate in draftspace". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Charin_Mendes can you please help me with this matter and give me some advice as to what can be done to get it live again. I have also resubmitted it for review so can you please check. Thank you!--Tashiya Jayatilaka (talk) 11:56, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Tashiya Jayatilaka, you will need to ask MrsSnoozyTurtle on their talk page why they tagged your article. You always have the option to move an article which has been "draftified" back into the mainspace but I highly suggest to address the editors concerns before. CommanderWaterford (talk) 12:01, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

CommanderWaterford (talk) Thank you for you advice. I have asked MrsSnoozyTurtle as well and awaiting a reply. I have also resubmitted the page for review. Can you help me with reviewing the page please? Thank you!--Tashiya Jayatilaka (talk) 12:08, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi, I saw that you deleted all my changes made on Masamichi Amano's page. The English page is extremely incomplete, so I decided to extend it. The sources I used are his Wikipedia.jp page and VGMDB. I spent time translating everything to make it understandable in English. It took me a lot of time and work on my working hours. I would like you to find a way to restore the work I did. Regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:E0A:5DC:C0:0:0:93C0:545 (talk) 12:24, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

By mistake all your edits had been reverted although only the last one was targeted, I restored them. Please note that your last edit was completely unexplained, you need to provide a sufficient explanation in the edit summary if you remove so much content. CommanderWaterford (talk) 12:28, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Could I know what my last edit was about again? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:E0A:5DC:C0:0:0:93C0:545 (talk) 13:28, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Thomas Whatman. I'm doing family tree. He's an ancestor, through the Hole family of Sussex. Thomas Whatman MP is long dead. He married Cecily de Sackville. I was just adding in, or correcting, information that is available from UK House of Commons. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.97.108.45 (talk) 13:13, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello. Please see the article - Draft:Mediacube. I have added a link detailing the history and activities of the company. This source is known in the territory of Belarus (the company is also from this country). Also according to the rules: 1) A scholarly article, a book passage, or ongoing media coverage focusing on a product or organization. This company is considered in a scientific article and has a review in authoritative media. Research Article - 1; Detailed examination of the company - 2. I ask for your help in transferring the article in the main space. Thank! Gadagasu (talk) 20:03, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi. I noticed that my page for the 2021 Plano municipal elections was rejected. Would you recommend waiting until after the election has occurred before submitting the page again, that way the page has real results to show? There is a page for the 2017 Plano municipal elections, which also happens to be a mayoral election year, so my best guess is that this election, unlike larger ones, doesn't warrant having a page until after it has already happened (Or at least until the time between the first round and the almost inevitable runoffs). Thanks for your help! OutlawRun (talk) 22:04, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Hey, CommanderWaterford. I'm Nicona'sCarrer First of all, I was wondering. did series 6 of Tree Fu Tom exist on TV, or did Wikipedia made that up? Secondly, I didn't know the the crew of bluezoo hires the voice actress of The Loud House Nika Fetterman is playing the voice of Catherine in this show. And third, can't they hire Rob Paulsen to be the voice of my favorite character Twigs instead of Matt Hill because I'm afraid he's gonna voice like Ed from Ed, Edd, n Eddy. And forth, dose it have to do with a Villain in the show instead of The Muschas? And finally, do the crew have to hire Navi (Impersonator) and Phil LaMarr in US version to the voice of Treetog's brother Captain Treetoe? a brown skin Michael Jackson like sprite who's Treetopolis's long time hero, and Tom, Twigs, and Catherine's new dancing teacher in series 7. Thank You. Nicona'sCareer (talk) 22:05, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello, CommanderInDubio. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Margery Wolf at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle☿gab 05:40, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi CommanderWaterford, I've made a few changes to the article; I consolidated Wolf's books under a new "Works" section. I removed some promotional text and added several [citation needed] templates. I found a bigger problem with the final section "The Revolution Postponed: Women in Contemporary China". Questia closed in Dec 2020, and checking the archive-url, I find the link goes to a page about an Austrian woman who died in 1942, resulting in a {{not in source}} template. You'll probably want to fix these problems before nominating the article for GA status. Good luck with the article and cheers, Baffle☿gab 05:40, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your CE, Baffle gab1978. CommanderWaterford (talk) 07:38, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

@CommanderWaterford,

I'm confused as to why my article is not being accepted based on my sources not being "releveant enough" for my page Draft:Flinch_(2021_Film).

IMDB is one of the best known sources in the world of filmmaking and gives credit to most of my information. The rest, such as the synopsis, comes directly from a press release that I was given by the director, as I work with him. It seems a bit over the top to me that my post is being rejected even though I work with the director of the film.

Hi @Elfarmies:, first of all please do not forget to sign your messages, see WP:SIG. IMDB is not a WP:RS since it is freely editable for everyone. IMDB as the only source for a film is by far not sufficient. CommanderWaterford (talk) 10:27, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello,

I noticed that you deleted a line I wrote on genetic variability by region, this line did contain a citation that I had spent some time inserting. The comment that was left on the history of that was " not providing a reliable source". Could you please expand on that? The article (PMID: 30061702) was published in the journal Scientific Reports, is that not a reliable source? https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-29851-3#citeas) "Exploring Cuba’s population structure and demographic history using genome-wide data".

What I had written was: Although, there is high variability by region, with individuals from Western provinces having higher European ancestry on average and lower Native American contribution.

If you would like to confirm the validity of what I wrote for yourself, please read the article, it is clear that the various regions have marked genetic variability with what I wrote above holds true. Cuba does not have homogeneous populations, both culturally and genetically. I intended to break up the picture more and introduced this variability by region concept as it is very evident in the island itself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GaliCan (talk • contribs) 13:16, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

GaliCan, first of all please do not forget to sign your messages per WP:SIG. Your edit was removed because you added several sentences to the article and/or modified them without presenting a WP:ILC for them. The Nature Report is of course a WP:RS, no question at all. But it is better not modifying so much content without a) explaining why and b) providing citations for your additions. Happy Editing, CommanderWaterford (talk) 13:21, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

I removed the content because a user called Fram is removing my articles and/or tagging them with a speedy deletion template TableSalt342 (talk) 09:35, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Hey. Thank you for the thanks. ApproximateLand (talk) 11:40, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

This user is going to each and every one of my articles and either moving to draftspace or tagging them with a speedy deletion for reasons like 'unreliable sources' or 'this needs to be rewritten' instead of tagging my articles with a template. For example, on Draft:Bromley, Victoria, I reworded 60% of the source, with the exception of a quote and a population table, which is enough recreation to not warrant copyright infringement, and yet he still tags it with a speedy deletion. He is trying to deliberately delete all of my pages, and he's the only one complaining about them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TableSalt342 (talk • contribs) 12:07, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

TableSalt342, you should discuss those issues with the user Fram, btw a very experienced editor. From a quick view of mine it seems that this user has very good reasons for tagging them. CommanderWaterford (talk) 12:17, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

could you explain properly --61.94.66.18 (talk) 14:12, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Good Evening. I did the appeal because they are Greek football clubs in European competitions. This article concerns the Greek championship. That's why I undone them. I wrote exactly this in the summary. You are the most experienced so do what you think is best. Thanks. Ποδοσφαιρόφιλος (talk) 20:32, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Your revert here restored OR, and deleted properly referenced non-OR.[2] And in a BLP, no less. With heinous accusations, not in the refs. It was very wrong. Especially given that you used tools. And your edit summary, to boot, was completely incorrect. --2603:7000:2143:8500:F826:1CA:39D1:4428 (talk) 21:09, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for reverting vandalism, mr Commander. I've partially blocked the range 2a02:c7f:da81:d100::/64 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) that has been messing with Hugo Boss (fashion designer). Bishonen | tålk 21:50, 22 March 2021 (UTC).

Bishonen, thank you very much CommanderWaterford (talk) 21:52, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Afternoon, article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/POSCO_International are now updated with citations. no Vandals here, just lack of citations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emuleworker (talk • contribs) 00:23, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello Commander,

Thank you for being so attentive to deletions. As explained in the edit summary when making the changes the second time: I deleted some old examples of refused citizens' initiatives and inserted a link to a (regularly updated) list of all refused initiatives. This resulted in deleting text, but actually I added more information. I've kept the case of "Stop TTIP" as an example of a controversial case. I've also updated the terminology ("refused" and not "rejected"). Why keep two old examples from 2014, if in total there were 26 refusals? Moreover, in this article there is a lot of outdated info. I plan to add the updates but also delete info that is not relevant anymore. If this should be done first in the sandbox (I've never used it before), fine. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1307BAR (talk • contribs) 08:33, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi CommanderWaterford, thanks for checking in and for the explanation! Regarding the Draft:TasteAtlas article, I've "published" a draft before I saw your entry on the talk, so would leave it there for review, if you feel that's okay. I fully disclosed the connection/conflict of interest on both my user page and in the Revision Comments for transparency sake. I did try to make the article as short, factual, objective, and neutral as possible, basing all additions on a myriad of popular and reliable sources.

Since I've already "published" the changes and the article itself is a draft, do you think you might be able to check the article itself and see if it adheres to the posting policy?

As for the username, it is my FirstnameLastname (I'm a sole proprietor, so my name has to be in the company's full legal name).

Thanks once more for the help! --TonciJajic (talk) 09:08, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Hallo, re Benin River: you added Category:Rivers. It might be more useful to add a category which indicates "Nigeria", to bring the article to the attention of the appropriate editors and Wikiproject. I've added Category:Rivers of Nigeria instead, and added a talk page banner for the project too. PamD 09:25, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Good work PamD, only you missed converting the bare url. Should be fine now. CommanderWaterford (talk) 09:31, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

I translated into English as this turned up as a very important topic at one of my customers. In Europe it is very difficult to aquire projects within the Automotive industry if you're not TISAX certified. I wanted to help, but as I have very little time, I do not care if you delete the article, fine with me.--Pachamama Sonnenkönigin (talk) 13:21, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Could you explain what "Current Version + WP:BEFORE does not give me any result which could establish sufficient notability per WP:NBOOK" really means? Your reason is quite broad, could you justify your decision?

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dallavid (talk • contribs) 20:20, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello Dallavid, I always welcome a friendly salutation. You should follow the hyperlinks given in the Reasons ( like WP:NBOOK ) and you will see that the subject of your article does not fit into those criterias. CommanderWaterford (talk) 20:27, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Could you be more specific with which hyperlink I should follow? (I am new to editing articles of books) Is the problem with what I wrote (e.g. too little infomation) or the fact that this book shouldn't be on wikipedia? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dallavid (talk • contribs) 15:50, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

@Dallavid You should follow this link: [[WP:NBOOK]] - your book needs to fit into those criterias CommanderWaterford (talk) 16:45, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello CommanderWaterford. I am happy with your happy feedback to follow and improve the articles that I publish. Cordially. --Kalimoun (talk) 09:11, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

List_of_people_who_died_on_the_toilet - in case you think you have seen everything.... CommanderWaterford (talk) 17:48, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for feedback on my edits on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liam_Kerr

Still learning wikipedia and not really sure how it works yet so sorry if this chat doesn't work as I imagined. The other account which you replied to was also me - I didn't realise I had jumped browsers and wasn't myself!

Anyway, thanks again for your time and feedback. I'm keen to make sure information is accurate, my intention is to make sure peoples pages are accurate and have everything relevant on them, as opposed to only the things they may want there.

My original impetus to update Kerrs page was that the majority of the citations pointed to a dead link which I did not consider appropriate.

Mikethemikethe (talk) 19:26, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi. Please do not use the Daily Mail as you did at Tina Mahon. It is not a reliable source. See WP:DAILYMAIL. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 22:16, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

I see that you use reply-link to respond to messages on talk pages. I used to use this also. You might want to consider enabling the Discussion beta feature in your preferences which was very recently enabled on the English Wikipedia. It works very similarly but has both a Wikitext and Visual editor mode, and some other nice features. If you are considering trying it out you might want to read more on it's MediaWiki page. I just thought this might be helpful, so feel free to tell me if it wasn't. bop34 • talk • contribs 21:58, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

@Bop34 - Thank you very much, very helpful, indeed. CommanderWaterford (talk) 22:07, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

@Timtrent for your info since u r also using reply-link, it is indeed by far better CommanderWaterford (talk) 23:28, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

soon find out Fiddle Faddle 00:19, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Looks like a good recommendation Fiddle Faddle 00:20, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

This statistic information on COVID-19 pandemic in Mongolia is very old. I made a template with newest information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Enkhsaihan2005 (talk • contribs) 16:42, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi. Thanks for letting me know. I removed the plot as it is false, claiming there is no winner, even after the director confirmed there would be winner. My edit was reverted as someone requested a plot to be there. We should wait until the film gets released in the USA, then the plot will hopefully be true. Thank you for your concern Red Mask X, 28 March 2021, 10:42 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Red Mask X (talk • contribs) 09:42, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article "Christmas Carol, Chemically Cleaned" has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

In the section Time reference and personal background I masked this sentence fragment "Stefan Neuhaus saw the poem Christmas," because to me, as it stands, it is meaningless. It could be the introduction to a quotation. This will need your attention. Best of luck with the GAN when you get to it.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 13:52, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

@Twofingered Typist Thank you VERY MUCH for your engagement! CommanderWaterford (talk) 16:44, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

I have restored the rollback you performed via WP:HUGGLE as its a constructive edit and claims are supported by WP:RS with a edit a summary. See (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rudranil_Ghosh&type=revision&diff=1014705929&oldid=1014209344) for details. Thank you. 2402:3A80:113B:623E:50C3:D72:F4F0:5EE1 (talk) 17:44, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Ok. Saw the last edit only with no edit summary at all but you did it explain it well before, ok. CommanderWaterford (talk) 17:48, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

17:29, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

What disruptive thing I have done. The writing is in total mismanagement way. Please give corelrect explanations. Khalidwarrior (talk) 12:10, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

"Correcting violations on the page." was your edit summary and you removed the whole lead of the article. What is "writing in a mismanagement way" ? If you remove central parts of an article without an understandable explanation you will have to explain it, best would be before on its article talk page. CommanderWaterford (talk) 12:20, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Okay, thanks for your reply. Did you read that part. That part is not central, that is the starting line. That whole new added paragraph had changed the previous created page starting. The content I removed is because it's not introducing line on the concerned matter, it's written that it is organised by ISI and Pakistan with source also. And really is it starting of a page. That part should be below after the starting part which is there before. That is the rules and regulations of Wikipedia that the article should be in a mannered way. Not like this - 2021 anti-modi bangladesh protest Wikipedia page starting that it is organised by pakistan and ISI. And not that it is a rally and demonstartions which is there before. READ PROPERLY AND THEN GIVE ANSWER. IF I AM WRONG I WILL TRY TO CORRECT MYSELF. Khalidwarrior (talk) 14:27, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Great job! Here is your Certificate of completion! Happy editing & reviewing! Atsme 💬 📧 19:11, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

T h a n k y o u :-) CommanderWaterford (talk) 19:15, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello Sir Akshaya Gurav was born in 1993. I made a mistake while creating this page PA12194 (talk) 06:07, 31 March 2021 (UTC)