This page is for archiving everytime Facepalm has been used on the Commons talk page.

Cluebot is worse than SkyNet. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.114.127.165 (talk) 08:50, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, if you say so... - Rich(MTCD)^T|C|E-Mail 22:43, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Facepalm --The Σ ^talk_contribs 02:11, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

stop reverting what I am writing — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.219.188.103 (talk) 21:21, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You got reverted once then once again by a human. How about you don't vandalise. - DamianZaremba ^{(talk • contribs)} 21:24, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Facepalm - How about you read the top of the page? --The Σ ^talk_contribs 02:46, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As was seen on AN/I, a vandal plastered images of (Redacted) on a highly visible template redirect. Does CBNG detect image-vandalism? Is there any way it can be implemented to search for words in the file name like "swastika" or "4chan" and instantly revert its addition? --The Σ ^talk_contribs 00:48, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The bot doesn't currently do any form of image->text translation to run though the ANN. This would be awesome however I am not sure how reliable it OCR would be. I would suggest it would require separate entries in the ANN as well as article content and image content will most likely vary. While this could be implemented into the review/training/production stuff It would probably need BAG approval and a lot of training/testing. I would be interested to hear others view on it though as I'm not really aware of that much vandalism by inserting images. Another thought could be CBNG checking the image summary stuff however most images uploaded for the purposes of vandalism probably would not have this completed to a level that it would contain anything "catchable" by the bot. - DamianZaremba ^{(talk • contribs)} 06:22, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Might this and this convince you? Both are very high visible templates. The rev-deleted one was vandalized with swastikas and fecal material, as stated by the admin who removed the vandalism. The names of the files are good enough, and especially because they're put on templates! --The Σ ^talk_contribs 06:35, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

CluelessBot! Just undid a valid change I made to an article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.8.80.75 (talk) 16:28, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

'ClueBot isn't a human' , so why are you telling us? --The Σ ^talk_contribs 19:10, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cluebot fails.

I was going to revert this... but it can stay for lols - Rich(MTCD)^T|C|E-Mail 10:09, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

With an extra Facepalm to go with it - Rich(MTCD)^T|C|E-Mail 10:10, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

'Supreme facepalm of destiny' When a regular facepalm just isn't enough... --The Σ ^talk_contribs 21:08, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cluebot, I was fixing some grammatical mistakes in Barnyard (video game). Why did you turn it back to the way it used to be? You must be a dumb robot to not know to press space after commas and end punctuations, unless it was you who did it! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.24.91.67 (talk) 20:28, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello IP, if this was a false positive then please report it here so the Bot can be trained on it. Thanks.--5 albert square (talk) 20:33, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mind if I add an extra Facepalm for the big flashing message saying CBNG isn't human? --The Σ ^talk_contribs 20:35, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

'Supreme facepalm of destiny' Sorry but the regular facepalm just isn't enough there! IP it's more than likely that you set off one of ClueBot's filters which the Bot would then automatically revert. As ClueBot is not human it doesn't understand things like grammar and spelling. Just what it perceives to be possible vandalism.--5 albert square (talk) 20:55, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cluebot you don't have a clue do you? Didn't think so. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.88.172.13 (talk) 00:23, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Supreme facepalm of destiny --The Σ ^talk_contribs 00:34, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Facepalm --Jcaraballo enwiki eswiki 20:33, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Whatever the heck my page was, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

• Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: RollerCoaster Tycoon 3 was changed by 141.215.108.165 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.914221 on 2011-06-28T18:22:03+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:22, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fricking robots, I'mma let my friend Dan magnetize you.

Supreme facepalm of destiny. You're funny. Actually, you can't magnetise ClueBot unless you break into ClueNet where the servers are. And in any case, you should be thanking ClueBot for cleaning up half the crap that makes it to Recent Changes with little reward. Most of it's by IPs like yourself, 141.215.108.165. --The Σ ^talk_contribs 19:53, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

YOU ARE A FREAKY DUMBHEAD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

DumbHead456 (talk) 23:20, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Supreme facepalm of destiny Oh. Your point? --The Σ ^talk_contribs 01:37, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Facepalm -- Cobi^(t|c|b) 07:18, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you editing Wikipedia? Go home to Armenia and shut your mouth. you lie and make things up. Stop now your PKK vermin. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HistorianTurkey (talk • contribs) 13:13, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

{{facepalm}} --The Σ ^talk_contribs 19:55, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comparing the content removed to that archived, {{tl|facepalm|supreme}} became {{tl|facepalm|supreme}}. DMacks (talk) 21:01, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's inherent in CBIII - The bot is configured to archive conversations carrying {{facepalm}} by the archivenow parameter. CBIII converts them into {{tl}} upon archival. --The Σ ^talk_contribs 21:28, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ah I see...previous archivings were manual, so they don't have that change. DMacks (talk) 21:31, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Undoing my changes to the Ontario provincial candidates list... read gpo.ca, they have their candidates list there. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.95.109.43 (talk) 03:00, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

{{facepalm}} See that blue box at the top of this talk page, read it and do it :) - Rich(MTCD)^T|C|E-Mail 13:14, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think Cobi shouldn't have removed the flashing text. --The Σ ^talk_contribs 21:05, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Don't u dare acuuse me of being bad at editing or I'll [push you off a cliff]!!!

{{facepalm}} --Σ ^talk_contribs 20:37, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know that this program FAILS — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.180.86.208 (talk) 16:28 18 July 2011

{{facepalm}} - It's a good sign when people complain about an expert's skill at antivandalism. --Σ ^talk_contribs 20:52, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Talk:Cuban sandwich/Archives/2009/August requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Zeng8r (talk) 02:28, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, now a CSD criterion that applies only to article space now applies to pages in the talk namespace? --Σ ^talk_contribs 04:57, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And this has what to do with CBNG? - Rich(MTCD)^T|C|E-Mail 19:03, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

CB III generated the page and shares the same Discussion pages. - DamianZaremba ^{(talk • contribs)} 19:27, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Slap me now... duh... this is Commons not just for CBNG {{facepalm}} for me... - Rich(MTCD)^T|C|E-Mail 11:20, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I hate Wikipedia. I have not edited as your are are laying allegation on me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.186.48.223 (talk) 09:31, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

{{facepalm}} ClueBot never warned you... your talk page is empty and has never had any edits - Rich(MTCD)^T|C|E-Mail 22:19, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

hi..good morning..regarding the jewish Dulay..well, thanks for your concern..it is not vandalism..the jewish connection..it is true....and I think our clan members in the Philippines deserve to know it...because it is our ancestry..it may be painful to some people but we have to accept the past as a fact of life. one of our sephardi jews relatives, Dante Menoza is very active in our facebook group. His family is active in Jewsih congregation in US. regards. and we are very thankful that you are guarding our wikipedia article for probable destructive entries. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.204.172.22 (talk) 22:04, 9 August 2011 (UTC) WINSTONS — Preceding unsigned comment added by Larryb107 (talk • contribs) 13:57, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

{{facepalm}} --Σ _{^talkcontribs} 20:15, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Clubbot you think you're so special, because you have a clue about what stupid idiots told you in the past. You think I care?? I don't care you're just an ignorant as hell fool, clue bot. Your edits are pointless to your entire existence because you just don't understand the clueless christian are bot ants to. Think about it, from the book, to the person, to the preacher, to the confession booth.. hahah. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.54.10.11 (talk) 00:41, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

... said the foulmouthed, whiny IP address. {{facepalm}} --Σ _{^talkcontribs} 01:52, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	The bestestestestestestestest bot everrrr YuMaNuMa (talk) 09:48, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

i hate you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.64.148.163 (talk) 18:15, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

{{facepalm}} Too bad. The bot is everywhere, so get used to it. --Σ _{^talkcontribs} 02:02, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.38.150.146 (talk) 02:01, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Prick. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.35.132.37 (talk) 11:43, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

{{facepalm}} Σ is not home (Leave message) 15:39, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In this article Coconut_custard have many wrong view between Thailand and Cambodia. I just want to write the view of Thai people, and I want many advice from you. Please to advice me! I have some question that could I separate the view between Thailand and Cambodia? I mean can I make a new page for only Thai view. This article is falsity! The user Dara make wrong view about that. --Anuwater (talk) 11:08, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

{{facepalm}} ClueBot is not human and therefore can't answer your question or give you advice on articles. If information in an article is incorrect then please be bold and correct it and add reliable sources to back up your information--5 albert square (talk) 23:19, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

	You're a Bitch!
	You undid my edit on Eminems Recovery and it was informational just like the thing on The Eminem Show where it says The Kiss (Skit) you can here him at the end say "Mother Fucker"! on the clean version so change it back please. GH200 (talk) 19:21, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

{{facepalm}} →Στc. 19:31, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are simply making a joke of wikipedia and behaving ridiculously. If it is 'vandalism' to add one single word (postumously in this instance) to make better sense of a sentence, then this wiki project is a farce and not worthy of it's status. If a person is stated to have died in 1992 but is added to a hall of fame in 2002, the word posthumously makes a better sentence. I am sorry if this appears to be "vandalism". It should also be noted that this subject was better known as Winnie Wooldridge. Adding her married name isn't vandalism either. Nor should it need citation. I shan't be bothering with this ridiculous site ever again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.31.246.114 (talk) 19:21, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

{{facepalm}}Well, ClueBot does make mistakes every now and then as does every Wikipedia robot I think, I was about to say ClueBot's only human but of course it's not. I can only think that something in the surname or in the edit in general triggered one of the robots filters and that's what caused the reversion of your edit. If it is a false positive then please report it here so we can train the robot. Thanks--5 albert square (talk) 21:23, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]